"999 Lattice" or
"SPRING TIME THEORY"
CC copyright Sean Giollaighan
Any use of any new ideas in this paper must include attribution, full terms explained below.
By Sean Giollaighan June 2022
independent interpreter of data, currently no fixed address
Email: [email protected]
INTRODUCTION
Writing the Theory of Everything encompasses so many concepts, equations, experiments and fields of physics it is hard to know where to start and how to keep it
1. Simple enough to be readable and understandable by a person with a basic level of physics and mathematics.
2. Complex and mathematically robust enough to engage academics and research physicists with advanced levels of data and mathematics.
So I have tried to keep it simple and make an intro encompassing all the basic principles as simply and clearly as possible. As far as I can see these key points should be enouģh for anyone working in physics to apply to whatever field they are working in and make sense of all the equations, phenomenon and dynamics currently baffling particle physics. I suggest that anyone working in Theoretical physics, quantum field theory, cosmology, electrical physics etc use the simple quantum structure and classical logic to apply it and work with in their field. The body of work after that goes into more detail with all the experimenental data references in the main body of the work.
NOTE:Many of the videos linked in the paper are to a youtube channel which has been closed for no specific reason*. New videos and some saved videos illustrating aspects of this model of quantum and cosmological physics are now uploaded to a new channel on odysee.com titled "Science Not Dogma". It us currently a work in progress.
* Given this work proves the big bang is wrong, the particle model is conceptually wrong and ideas like time travel and wormholes are nonsense it has aggravated a lot of people in power. People who control scientific information, in the massively lucrative big bang particle model industry where almost all funding for Theoretical physics and astrophysics research goes. The channel is the 2nd to be closed by youtube, the 1st was suspended after I proved Brian Schmidts Nobel prize win for redshift was wrong, I posted the correct interpretation on his channel and he/his team went ballistic. I was allowed an initial appeal. However Brian and/or his team put massive pressure on youtube to delete my channel, the reason given was "because I was promoting false science" despite the fact I broke no rules or community guidelines and I responded to youtube showing my explanation for redshift was solid, superior science based on the work of Einstein, Newton and Andrea Ghez youtube gave in to the pressure and deleted my 1st channel.
THE COSMIC FABRIC LATTICE
The block in the image at the top of the page shows the basic structure of the spacetime fabric, at each point in the spacetime fabric/lattice (also called the cosmic web) there is a spherical node which I call a Rik, which are all identical connected to 26 others by extremely flexible elastic type pipes which I call Tredds (which corresponds to what string theorists realised must be at play but failed to understand how) inside the Riks and Tredds flows a fluid.
There is only one physical force in the Universe, pressure, positive and negative pressure in the fluid. This gives positive and negative charge, Maxwells equations are fluid equations, charge is flow.
In Eulers identity e describes a single spherical harmonic oscillator/Rik being rotated, or twisted as a photon(wave) arrives at curvature and pressure causing there to be a vortex created within, I call it a torlectron (electron sized tornado/vortex)(Eulers identity in maths relates to accumulation of interest or momentum and in the quantum block it relates to the 27 quantum nodes and the connecting Tredds divided by 10^1, which is the range of Euclidian space through which the node in the fabric moves during the creation of matter). Eulers identity could be said to be the "God equation" in the sense that it describes the creation of matter from light. This torlectron is detected as the electron which has the value -1.
This also gives a more logical explanation for the photoelectric effect, it is a photon wave being twisted into an electron when it comes close to the torlectron/electron orbiting the atomic nucleus.
It is the torlectron which gives mass to everything, mass is a measure of the compaction of the fabric. As the torlectron moves inside the fabric its momentum twists the extemely flexible but extemely strong fabric into temporary clumps.
When the torlectron is detected with an out flow which is clockwise it is a positron, when it has an anticlockwise flow it is an electron, or vice versa.
When a torlectron gets caught in a geometric loop in the fabric it is bound to the loop by the geometry and by the negative or vacuum pressure generated by its own dynamics. A proton and most elementary shapes are a positron caught in a tight loop/manifold with its partner the electron stuck orbiting outside. They do not and cannot combine due to the mismatch in speeds. The positron is spinning inside, completing loops in much smaller areas than the electron, so despite having opposite charge they cannot couple because any coupling needs a similarity in rotational speed and direction, which of course can never happen no more than an olympic sprinter can run at full speed, hop onto and stay connected to a kids roundabout spinning at the same speed in its fixed location. The compaction of the proton and other heavy elementary shapes is due to more fabric being pulled in and compacted in a localized zone whereas the electron covers relatively vast areas in one completion of a loop able to pull in less fabric per area.
These loops form different shapes and strengths depending on the geometry. Quarks are where a torlectron gets temporarily held in one quantum oscillator pulling in 12 close oscillators, 12 is the maximum which can be pulled in tight (I called them FUBs, fundamental unifying blocks in this my ToE before I came across and realised they were the same as quarks). The pressure holds only for a short time and the torlectron is released and moves through the strands, but because the strands are stretched while the quark holds its shape then when it is released the torlectron can cause little twist and no compaction for a short time so is detected and currently identified as a gluon. It soon gets pulled back by the geometry and the wake of its own vacuum pressure, it gets held in a position again as a quark and is released this action happening trillions upon trillions of times a second so fast it gives the optical illusion they are unique, distinct, individual separate particles, they are not they are a series of identical loops. Quantum chromodynamics are where the quark shape gets temporarily held together by the negative pressure after the torlectron has left, effectively we get resonance, identified in 3 levels of resonance first when the torlectron is inside, second just after it leaves and a third in its final detectable level of resonance. The torlectron moves through trillions of Riks a second and the quark itself is not a fixed object it is an optical illusion as the torlectron gets stuck in identical dynamics as it passes through it appears like it is a single object, up and down quarks are depending on how and when we observe, it is merely the orientation of the compacted fabric in space at any particluar time that defines what we observe.
QUANTUM MECHANICS AND WHY WE KNOW THEY MUST BE VORTICES AND WAVES NOT PARTICLES
Quantum mechanics is a method of measuring what happens in the quantum realm. The most important thing to understand is that it is dependent on detection, we cannot detect and study many different phenomenon at the one time especially when many torlectrons may be moving in different directions in one locatality at 1/137 the speed of light. Schrodingers equation is a wave equation, the measurement problem is that we can only measure the propagation of a wave along one dimension, this is true in the macro realm and the quantum realm. In the macro realm we can see the full wave and know to extrapolate the measurement which we know will be the same in all directions away from the centre. In the quantum we only glimpse one part of the wave, the location where one torlectron is moving through. Photons of course cannot be observed as units from the side they can only be detected as they arrive head on to the detector. So we can only detect one part of the wave.
We can be sure what we observe is always a wave or a collection of coordinated waves produced by the movement of torlectrons inside the fabric, as in atoms by applying logic and logical interpretations of the experiments and why they cannot be particles. The main ones being
1. The double slit experiment.
2. Bell's Theorem
3. The photoelectric effect.
4. The equations of 137 alpha: vortex equations
5.The speed of light
(It is important to always remember that we never see a torlectron in quantum experiments we only observe or detect the effects they make on the fabric. When a torlectron twists the fabric then EMR electromagnetic radiation or light can no longer pass straight through, so it bounces off, hence it comes back to us so we detect and can understand that something must be moving inside)
1. In the double slit experiment each quantised measurement yields a single detection or hit on the back screen. The rest of the wave passes undetected. The wave function never collapses it is always converted from space into time and vice versa. When it appears to collapse from a wave to a particle in the detection for which way in space it is in fact detected in the timing. What we detect are single wave crests hitting the back screen detector because we have setup the experiment focusing on a different range of time, detecting only those parts of the wave passing through the slits which must be initial wave crests. We would need a longer range of time covering a greater range of space to see the interference pattern. The wave function is apparent in the timing because all energy fired gets through one or other slit every single time yet when we don't detect for which way and get the interference pattern we focus on a different range of time and few of any electrons, photons, buckeyballs etc fired get through. Only a wave can get through the slits every time, hence the wave function remains intact proving it must be waves. This inequality is what helped me realise that almost all current models and understandings in physics are flawed, what helped me go on to solve the Theory of Everything and come face to face with the biggest problem in physics, which I will call the *subject problem (*summarised below).
This inequality is impossible to explain using the particle model and common sense. Many bizarre, crazy, wierd explanations have been proposed by particle physicists but none make sense they all rely on far fetched nonsensical mysticism such as a particle can be in 2 places at one time, it can bump into itself and behaves differently some say decides to behave differently when it knows it is being observed. None of these ideas are credible but what is credible is that a wave can be observed in many different places at the same time, it can be split into waves which can collide with each other and what we observe is different depending on what way and when we look at the wave. The act of observing is a conscious act and it has been clear that consciousness plays at least some part in quantum diffraction and entanglement experiments. This is most clear when we have the experiment set up to detect for which way but do not collect the statistical data, physically it is the same experiment but because the focus is no longer on the data the interference pattern returns, so it cannot be something physically different happening it must be something conscious affecting how we detect the experiment. To assert that a conscious force physically changes the experiment would imply some kind of mysticism but we dont need any mysticism, what does not imply any mysticism and is witnessed every day is conscious focus. Those of us lucky enough to be able to hear can be in a crowded noisy environment and be able to focus on a single sound source just by focus, we can focus on the sound of a bird singing, then a stream tricking, then a branch rustling, then a squirrel shuffling around but we can only focus on one with clarity at a time, all events happen but if we try to detect which species of bird is singing by its song we zone out of the stream, branches and squirrel effectively we only detect the bird,the other sounds pass through our ears but are undetected in our consciousness. Similarly, with any of our senses, if we focus on one event in particluar we detect it with clarity and all others merge into the background. A simple experiment can verify if there is a conscious force present exerting focus in these experiments if anyone wishes to be scientific and test it is explained here in a 40 second video https://youtu.be/gNifw0TO87g
Longer 7 minute version with some Theory and experimental evidence of why it will work
https://youtu.be/bywC6rPfGjg I have been unable to get anyone willing to try it so far.
2. Bells Theorem. In the 1960s a Northern Irish physicist John Bell came up with a set of simple equations which proved that the particle model cannot be the correct model. However particle phyicists were so obsessed and blind sided with the particle model (John Bell included) they could not consider the simple reality. Instead they believed that it showed the particle model which they believed must be true to be an absolutely true but incomplete Theory and that the Universe must not have fixed laws. The reality is that Bell's equations reveal wave dynamics, with exact precision to quantum mechanics. To put it in simple terms it is perhaps best to compare how Bell's theorem works with both the particle model and my model where waves move through the fabric. In quantum mechanics to measure where a particle is detected at a later time using Schrodingers equation we detect the particle but the statistics seem odd and nonsensical at first glance, where we expect to detect 25% of particles we only detect 15%, where we expect to detect 50% of particles we detect 50% and where we expect to detect 75% of particles we detect 85%. Particle physicists have concluded the illogical idea that the Universe behaves differently with hidden rules which change at different times, that it does not have fixed rules but rather hidden or no set rules with random chance of which apply depending on when humans observe.
They can see no other option but that it is the Universe which is bizarre and wierd.
Compare this with my wave model, at 25% of the time evolution of a wave the wave has only gained a fraction of its maximum momentum and will be detected covering 15% of the total spacial area covered by the wave at maximum momentum, at 50% of the time evolution of a wave it is covering 50% of the spatial area and at 75% of the time evolution of the wave it is covering 85% of the spatial area covered by the wave at max momentum. So any detection of the waves at single point in space and time will show the same statistical correlation as expected by Bell's Theorem. This seems absolutely clear and simple but has been obscured and resisted by physicists due to the *subject problem.
3. Although the photoelectric effect is said by some to prove the particle model because a photon must be a tiny particle knocking an electron out of its orbital. At first glance this appears to make sense but not when we look a bit closer. The momentum of a photon is tiny compared with that of an electron, thousands of times less. One comparison I came across, which tries to illustrate how odd it is, compares a photon knocking an electron out of its shell as being like a seagull flying and crashing into a sturdy boat and sending the boat flying up a mile into the air. It is of course an extreme illustration but that is the point, the momentum of a photon and electron are so vastly different it does not add up logically other than at first glance without considering the momentum. If one looks at the wikipedia page in the photoelectric effect it is made clear early on that the photoelectric effect does not agree with what the particle model predicts. I previously suggested one way to test is to keep firing photons at the metal, if Einstein were correct all free electrons would get used up whereas if I am correct and electrons are being created from photons we will see electrons emitted regardless of how many photons we fire. However there is a problem with this, the constant bombardment by photons is likely to slow down the electrons or to say it another way decrease their energy. When the photoelectric effect is run over time what happens is that electrons stop being emitted.....but....if the energy of the photons are increased they begin to be emitted again. This makes a lot more sense using my Theory where the combined momentum needed to twist a wave into a vortex must necessitate an increase in the photons momentum in direct proportion to the decreasing energy of the electrons in the shell which are causing the new vortex to form. One way to check is to calculate how many atoms are on the surface in a specific amount of metal and how many electrons are theoretically free to be ejected. I predicted there will be phenomenally more electrons detected being emitted than there are theoretically free electrons.
The other oddity is that if we apply logic then the momentum of a photon would be arriving hitting an electron from outside the orbital which should push the electron closer to the atomic nucleus not away from it.
Even before testing my Theory makes much more sense when one looks a bit below what seems obvious at first glance.
4. The equations of alpha 137 are vortex equations, they correspond to the quantum harmonic oscillators and how the flow of the fluid (flow otherwise known as charge) within the system is affected by the vortexes within. The basic equation is position divided by momentum, at any point in the fabric there are 7 quantum harmonic oscillators touching, how many are collectively touching and how many torlectrons are moving within the system defines how far the charge or pull can be detected and take hold which is defined by n on the general equation. This gives us ((n×π×7)/(n×π^7))/Λ where lambda denoted by Λ is Einsteins cosmological constant representing the average diverence of curvature off perfect flatness in the fabric which cause the average pressure which is slightly off perfect 50:50 or perfect 1.
5. The speed of light. We know we cannot measure the speed of light in one direction we can only measure it going in 2 directions to and from a mirror, getting the overall time and distance there and back However this cannot be a particle, it must be a wave because everything in the Universe is moving, the Earth moves around the sun at about 30km/s and around the milky way at 220km/s. If light were a particle and we fire a particle directly at a mirror one light second away by the time it arrive straight at the original location of the target it will miss the target because the target has moved miles away from its original position. So it can never hit it, if by chance we aim ahead of the target, anticipate where it will be and hit it, it still can't come straight back because then we have moved, so either way it cannot be a particle it must be a wave. It is deceptively simple, but indisputable, it cannot move in a straight, direct line there and back, it cannot be a particle. To whitewash this obvious incompatability particle physicists try to tell us it is a particle with a wave function the meaning of which which no one can explain. The truth is it is always a wave/ripple or collection of waves/ripples created by vortexes moving inside the lattice.
Once one understands and accepts these basic principles everything in physics can be understood. I came into this field as an interpreter and saw fairly soon what the correct interpretation was but from the start I faced the subject problem and had to learn current quantum physics Theory from scratch in order to decode it and put it into the correct model. I will explain the subject problem after summarising some of the many things which current physicists cannot and never will explain using the particle model.
Dark matter is negative or vacuum pressure or collective charge in the fluid holding objects like planets and stars to galactic centres.
Dark energy is an optical illusion caused by gravitational lensing. As large massive bodies grow they pull in more fabric, pulling in the gravitational lenses which we look out at the Universe through. This increases the magnification and gives the optical illusion. In Einsteins acceleration equation in Relativity ä for acceleration at short distances and few lenses becomes magnification at long distances viewed through many cosmic gravitational lenses. The redshift is due to less energy or fluid getting through with light en route, as the fabric is stretched the diameter in the Tredds is reduced allowing less energy through. Newton showed with prisms that path change showed colour change, Andrea Ghez and team showed that gravity saps energy from anything passing by through its gravitational locality.
Time dilation, special Relativity is no different than General Relativity they are one and the same. Time dilation relates to how the location in the fabric and energy in the environment affects clocks, it is about clocks not time. Time is universal but clocks register or measure different times, if 2 clocks moved in different speeds through time zones in the past or future we could never get them to meet up they would exist in different locations in time. This is clearly not the case because clocks measuring different times exist in the same time zones when brought back together from different locations, one does not exist in the past or future they both exist and always existed in the one Universal time continuum. Time dilation in atomic clocks is affected by length contraction which is affected by altitude, energy input and gravitational pull. In summary the radius of electron orbitals vary depending on the stretch of the fabric in the environment so the amount of energy needed to saturate an electron orbital and emit a photon marking an increment in time takes shorter or longer depending on the location, giving variations in measured time.
Black holes violate the Planck limit, physicists know that physics beyond the Planck limit are meaningless but they routinely forget or ignore this fact when proposing black holes with infinite singularities. Singularities do not exist in physics any more than a piece of string has only one end or a house has an outside but no inside, it is meaningless and not tenable in real science. It works using math which can be unlimited and infinite but not in physics which the evidence of the Planck limit shows us is limited and finite. They are dark stars the scorching hottest things in the Universe generating their own energy inside. Because energy is conserved in one dimension and the double slit experiment proves detected energy is only energy detected in one dimension then energy is propagated in all other directions moving away from us undetectable. In dark stars however once the Planck density has been reached then within the doundary of that region the fabric has been stretched so much that the diameters in the Tredds get closed up so energy in the form of light or matter cannot escape or enter. What can be pulled in however is more fabric, which allows for more energy to be propagated and the thing grows, this is what powers the illuminosity of stars (not atomic reactions, although some happen, they are not the central generators of the heat and matter) and the mass of dark stars. The whole model of star formation and processes is wrong, the Jeans model of star formation from gas clouds is wrong, it treats gravity as a force which it isn't, it is how the geometry of spacetime affects the path of energy. The Jeans model works perfectly for regions with large massive objects such as planets and stars but it doesn't and cannot work for gas or dust clouds which cannot distort the fabric into paths this can only be done by large objects.
The big bang is flawed for the same reason it violates the Planck scale along with Quantum mechanics which prohibits 2 particles existing in the same space, which definitely prohibits all the particles in the Universe existing in one place. The obervations said to be confirming the big bang are collective misunderstandings. The CMB is said by particle physicists to prove the big bang correct because they say we can see it but the CMB isotropic distribution actually proves the big bang wrong, indicating the Universe is likely much older but that was whitewashed with (lets be honest, objective and clear) science fiction or fairytale physics called inflation which has zero evidence in reality and is extremely far fetched, there is no failsafe way to measure whether microwave radiation is from a far away or close location especially given my model for redshift. I say it is resonance in the field, the echo from the light passing through the fabric, the evidence corroborates my work with no need for fairytale physics.
Magnetism is due to the torlectrons being polarised to move in the same direction or opposite, giving positive or negative charge, the orientation in space changes the orientation in time and allows or forbids coupling. Pushing and pulling plus the geometry explains everything.
There are too many problems and areas to cover everything in one short introduction, much more are explained in the paper. I believe what is given here is enough for physicists to work on and make sense out of everything else in physics when they apply this logic to their own equations and disciplines.
The problem of left handed chirality seems to be linked to conscious focus. As focus is apparent, reasonable and verified by experimental evidence it seems clear that chirality is a matter of focus, it is perhaps no wonder that the P violation was done by Chien-Shiung Wu a woman. Perhaps why there is so much left handedness in physics, perhaps it is simply a dominance of male perspective or conscious focus with so few females making high level discoveries which then become fixed. Admittedly this is speculation but if true surely has many experiments awaiting to be violated and shaken out of the current models and understandings when women try the same experiments in different ways.
This brings me to the subject problem in reality it is the subjective problem. As many know it is almost impossible to get clear absolute scientific objectivity in science. Theoretically the only way to get true objectivity in science is to remove all economic interest, all personal bias, all uncertanty and all emotional attachment to ideas. As explained the case for consciousness is clear and easily understood with an experiment to test without any bias, room for misinterpretation or mysticism. The fact that consciousness plays a part is not just what we detect physically that is limited, what we accept and adopt is affected by our emotional and conceptual limitations and blindsides. When an observation is confirmed in quantum physics then that observation remains from then on. It becomes fixed, the reality is however that it may be a matter of interpretation it may not be objective it may be subjective with only one perspective currently given or known. Electric charge of a positron or electron for example is only a perspective, we could call an electron a positron and a positron an electron, it is a subjective conclusion. However once that conclusion has been accepted it becomes entrenched and subject to inherent bias. The more that bias is confirmed then the more the bias is accepted as fact. Much of the common sense logic is clear to people who have not invested years of their time, money and intellectual energy to quantum physics. That a particle cannot be in 2 places at 1 time, nor can it bump into itself, it cannot move through empty space in a corkscrew path, it will not decide to behave different when it knows we are watching, the Universe must have fixed rigid rules so it surely must be the interpretations that are bizarre, wierd and nonsensical.
To particle physicists however the false subjective conclusions have become so entrenched partly by the fact that quantum physics has developed such fantastic technology means they are unable to think objectively. They think and react subjectively and more aggressively when the facts against their beliefs are stronger, while the explanations given in this intro are simple and clear to an objective reader it seems that particle physicsts are so unable to think objectively that they just can't believe or accept that everything could be so simple nor that they, so many of them can be so wrong.
A popular series of books and videos among particle physicists called "The Theoretical Minimum." pushes the idea that one must understand various different equations, concepts etc to understand quantum physics, the reality is that the Theoretical minimum is that one can apply classical logic to the quantum systems which perticle physicists cannot do and that one can make common sense out of experimental data which particle physicists cannot do. I do both without any need for equations when understanding the basic principles, I start with common sense making sense out of the experimental data. I have provided more tests to further confirm my interpretations as correct, simple tests to answer some of the biggest problems in Theoretical physics but to date I can't get anyone to try the tests, no one can dispute the simple math and logic in the double slit experiment, Bell's Theorem and 137. They can't be objective enough to accept the simple explanations for dark energy and matter, for Special Relativity and dark star processes. It is nothing to do with the facts, it is their subjective beliefs blinding them to the reality, they perhaps cannot accept that someone not trained and certified in quantum, mathematical, physics could have solved so much, everything in the space of 3 years. They cannot seem to tolerate the feeling long enough to look at the indisputable evidence and simple logic. They believe so much in their intelligence and their successes in technology, their academic qualifications, Nobel prizes (may of which my work proves are incorrect poor misunderstandings, great tech collecting great data but woefully misunderstood, or simply mathematics which is not credible as real world physics) that they emotionally cannot seem to stop for a second and believe everyone in their field could have missed so much that is so simple once pointed out. Their subjective emotions have been my biggest battle, my biggest problem. The evidence, math and logic is simple and clear but they react subjectively to it and so far all have resisted the solution which they believe so much must come from a highly trained physicist and arrive through the peer review system. All attempts at peer review have faced similar subjective walls and barriers. Although this probably could never have gone through the peer review system (which many say is highly flawed and dysfuntional) which may have been delayed excessively of reviewed by people unable to think outside the particle model, plus the inherent dangers of violent military interests potentially getting first access and trying to use it to their advantage This explains why the following Theory of Everything may seem so disjointed and unorthodox in style. I have not just faced peoples inability to accept experimental evidence, logic and simple math I have had to try and anticipate and try to appeal to their subjective emotional reactions. As I have already stated, all anyone really needs is the logic and the picture of the spacetime lattice, the quantum block with the quantum harmonic oscillators explained in this summary and any open minded person will be able to solve every problem previously baffing them. Just plug in the numbers and one will see this fixes all the current Theoretical and cosmological problems
For anyone else wishing to see the explanations in more detail please read on with only common sense, an objective look at the experimental evidence and simple math. I hope people may come to understand just how frustrating, stressful and depressing it has been that some of my emotions and frustrations have spilt over and are visible in my work. I began the work with insults and scorn but a light hopeful heart. That slowly changed as the burden of just how much dangers and suffering are happening and facing humanity everyday that the simple solution is ignored and aggressively oppressed by hysterical particle physicists some of whom have gone to great lengths to silence and even destroy my work from online. Ideally I would start again and rewrite everything meticulously with no spelling errors, all gramatically perfect, no jokes thrown in, to be solemn and clinical, to depict how serious it all is but at the minute it remains a huge task given I face it still homeless working with a cheap mobile phone, while dealing with the constant stress of the clock ticking down on a planet and species facing possible apocalyptic scenarios from many different sources, solar, environmental, artificial intelligence, political short sightedness etc. So I hope everyone or at least someone can forgive the shortcomings in style and technicality in detail, see the truth for what it is, run the simple experiments to test and get it circulating direct to the public as fast as possible.
ABSTRACT
The popular modern belief in mainstream physics is that the Universe is composed of tiny particles, tiny balls or spheres held together and interacting via forces that are not currently understood. This fundamental belief is wrong, what we percieve as particles are in fact waves and vortices detected moving through the fabric of space, the cosmic web. An inequality in the double slit experiment proves the particle model CANNOT be the correct model.
The solution to the double slit experiment reveals a single field/lattice that fills all of space, the properties and structure of the field unifies the logic of Quantum Mechanics, Relativity and Maxwells equations at the Planck level plus the 4 forces into 1 form of energy and the difference between gravity, the weak force and the strong force is the path energy takes, which is dictated by the geometrical shape of the field and pressure which is the one, the only true physical force. This field provides a classical explanation for every remaining problem in physics including quantum entanglement, Bell's Theorem, dark energy, dark matter, superfluidity, quantum gravity and much more. The (testable) solution reveals an optical illusion. Particles do not travel through empty space. The field is a transparent lattice, composed of hollow identical spheres or 'nodes' which are fixed in location by elastic pipes (strings) and through both flows a fluid. The fluid is in a closed system corresponding to the Planck limit so it cannot be detected but it's existence is clear using logical deduction of what electromagnetism, matter and dark matter truly are. The nodes oscillate/wobble and twist as waves (radiation) and vortices (matter) move within the lattice. The mistake is concluding that particles are quantised individual physical units moving through empty space, not so, it is the measurements of spherical waves of energy passing through the field nodes at phenomenal speeds which are quantised to one dimension. Dark energy is also an optical illusion. It is magnification, the spherical lenses in this cosmic web which we look out at the Universe through decrease in size as gravity grows and pulls in more fabric. This magnifies the images, making it appear like an expansion and increase in brightness in the Universe. The logic reveals 2 realms, the physical realm and the spirit/conscious/metaphysical realm but for anyone wishing to avoid metaphysical content the physics is explained separately. It provides experiments to further test how conscious focus affects measurement. The inseparable nature of these 2 realms reveals much more than expected, metaphysics which are inseparable from physics. Detectable energy quantised is a push leading to a detectable collision and I assert that the source of the push is from a force in the spirit/conscious realm.
While it is natural to doubt the existence of non human intelligence/consciousness interacting with us, there is a test. For anyone willing to be scientific and test for what I say is a super-intelligence here is a simple lab test using single photons or electrons. So rather than waste time theorising anyone with the tech can test
https://youtu.be/bywC6rPfGjg
The inability of physicists to unify the particle model into a full working model that makes classical sense is perhaps best explained by explaining briefly what many say are the 2 most famous puzzles in physics, one a number that arises in various calculations and the other an experiment which is impossible to explain in any classical way using the particle model, however contrary to popular assertion it can be explained using classical mechanics, just not particle mechanics because the particle model is wrong. These are
(a) the number alpha 1/137 and
(b) the solution to the double slit experiment.
(a)The number 1/137 (the exact figure currently measured being 137.035999...etc) is explained by the mathematics of the structure of the spacetime lattice/cosmic web and how a vortex is formed inside it. This vortex is what I call the torlectron detected passing through the fabric as an electron. It is this which gives mass to everything. Mass being the compaction of the cosmic web into clumps which we know as elements, compounds, solid objects, planets, stars and dark stars. The value of 1/137 comes from a photon which is a wave of fluid moving inside the web at the speed of light hitting pressure and curvature which twists it into a vortex. It is believed to be a particle because it is detected at single points in space and time but in reality it is only one part of the wave which can be detected in one dimension of time and one of space.
The number alpha 137 is ((n×π×7)/(n×π^7))/Λ (where Λ is Einstein's cosmological constant lambda). This can be understood when one understands the spacetime lattice quantum structure in the image at the top of the page. When the lattice is at rest in what we traditionally call outer space there are 7 nodes in the fabric (RIKs) when a vortex is passing through one of these RIKs the momentum of the vortex twists the RIK and therefore twists all the 6 RIKs which are directly attached to it. This will be happening to many connected RIKs in the region simultaneously as the wave passes through them all and they all hit that curvature and/or pressure almost instantly. The equation ((n×π×7)/(n×π^7))/Λ=α is describing the momentum of the vortex as it is manifest by the compounded interacting, oscillations of the 7 RIKs (π^7) and how that momentum is distributed between the 7 touching RIKs at any one point (π×7) divided by the pressure in the fluid within the lattice which is lambda, this pressure which reflects the fact the Universe is almost but not perfectly flat in our region of the Universe. This number for lambda will tell us the true size of the Universe (to be discussed later). N relates to the number of harmonic oscillators, spherical nodes in the fabric which twist as denoted by pi, which collide to have detectable energy. The value of n can be any number of harmonic oscillators twisting and colliding in all directions as the spherical waves propagate out, it could be 1 or 13x10^27 for example depending on the activity but its scope/range always extends to a range of 1:137.035999.... in all directions.
The reason 137 is found in so many instances in equations relating to light, magnetism, electricity and spacetime can be understood by understanding the equation for flow as a result of a vortex. Charge is flow, clockwise rotation of the vortex gives positive charge, anticlockwise rotation of the vortex gives negative charge, how this leads to attraction, repulsion and electromagnetic interactions is described later in the section on electromagnetism. For now the important thing is to understand how the equation for the vortex is linked to alpha 137. I use the example of where alpha137 is inherent in the equation for the opacity of light through graphene (a single layer sheet of carbon atoms). In this equation 1/137=e²/hc where e is the charge of an electron (the flow created by the vortex/torlectron) h is the Planck constant 6.6760507...×10^-34, which itself is 2πħ the product of the reduced Planck constant ħ 1.05451718...×10^-34 which is the radius of the spherical node in the fabric (identified by quantum mechanics as the quantum harmonic oscillator) when it is in its maximum excited state at any single point, multiplied by 2π which is one full 360° rotation of the node and where c is the speed of light in a vacuum.
This is refective of the standard equation for vortex flow where v=Γ/2πr (Γ being the flow not enclosed by the countours of any surface containing the vortex [120])
So working wìth this equation if we multiply both sides by c we get c/137=e²/h
then multiply both sides by 137 we get c=137×e²/h
c=137×e²/2πħ
(One particle physicist tried to dismiss this by saying that it is cross dimensionless analysis and meaningless, this however is another mistake caused by the subjective problem. Again particle physicists cannot face the fact that it is so easy, that there is only one force in the Universe which is electromagnetism. The flow in the speed of light is what is flowing in everything, even the charge of an electron.)
c/137 is the speed of an electron in a vacuum.
So in dimensionless numbers it is clear that where the wave normally passes through 137 nodes in the lattice in the forward direction in 1 dimensionless unit of time an electron/vortex passes through only 1 node in the same unit of time. Where the wave was moving through 137 nodes in the forward direction, when it is twisted into a vortex it rotates through one node 137 times in the same unit of time with the charge e² describing the circulation of the fluid by those rotations. e² is e×e for the area affected by the charge/flow created by the vortex. That is what the equation is telling us, that the electron is a detection of a forward wave a photon converted into a vortex and the charge is the distribution of the flow which formerly would have been the flow in and out of the nodes or RIKs as the wave passes each point in the fabric.)
All other manifestations of 137 are related to this fundamental dynamic happening inside the cosmic web/spacetime lattice. Which we can never verify with visible physical evidence, for example a photograph or film of the vortex because it is beyond what we can detect physically, we can only understand it by seeing how the field is distorted by something moving inside and using common sense, logic verified by the maths for the flow induced by an enclosed vortice shown here.
(b) The solution to the double slit experiment the “central problem of quantum physics”.
For anyone not familiar with the experiment you can read about it here [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment#Which_way see References 9,10,11,12,13.]
Or watch a simple but succinct cartoon explaining it here
https://youtu.be/Q1YqgPAtzho
Some particle physicists say that what is detected in the double slit experiment cannot be wave crests, they also say that it is impossible to explain the double slit experiment in any classical way. This is not true, it definitely cannot be explained in any classical way using the travelling particle model of physics where what we detect are believed to be particles travelling through empty space. However physicists have been looking at the data the wrong way around. The travelling particle in empty space model is wrong (as mounting violations of the particle model indicate and which I prove). They are waves and vortices moving through stationary nodes which wobble/oscillate(QM:spin) as the energy passes, the false assumption that they must be particles because they can be quantised to single objects is the mistake, it is an optical illusion. It is the measurement that is quantised to one part of a wave of energy moving through one quantum dimension of field nodes at phenomenal speed that creates the illusion, it is not one quantised particle.
In the double slit experiments the results of what is detected are linked to the range of time covered within the range of focus. Essentially nothing different physically happens when we detect for which way, the waves still merge and hit the back screen but we only detect those wave crests which which correspond to the space and time range between the slits. (Diagram shown later). There has been speculation of a case for physical interaction causing decoherence which seems to be at first glance supported by the work of an Italian team of physicists using a detection screen over one slit. However there remains problems which I explain soon.
Second is an inequality in the behaviour in the 2 experiment setups. This solution is clear, it is consistent with this Grand Unified field Theory in fact it unlocked it and is verified by all the data, to date it has answered every problem posed to me by others and has no violations of Relativity, QM or any data The field that is revealed by this Unified Field Theory works with no need for assumptions, cheating/fudges/scifi, and no violations of the data.
In both explanations the focus of the experiment is limited by the range of time set within the detection parameters. When the range of focus in the timing parameters change so does the resulting pattern on the back screen. This shows that the results of the experiment are pre determined to be detected within a set range before the experiments have even begun. When we detect for which way but do not collect the physical data the twin band is no longer detected, the wave interference pattern returns, reinforcing the assertion that it is a matter of focus.
What physicists term "the measurement problem" is the limitation that every measurement is done in one dimension of space and one of time. It is a misunderstanding of quantum mechanics, in any discrete act of measurement we are limited to one dimension but the wave itself always propagates out in all dimensions, the wave "function" never collapses, with measurement. It is narrowed down towards one dimension, when quantised it is quantised to one dimension and still there. when it is not apparent as a wave noticeable in the distribution of marks in the physical environment it is there in the distribution in time, which is usually the wavelength of the energy detected moving along one dimension. In the double slit experiment it is apparent in both physical space and time when we analyse and compare the 2 original experiments, that is, compare the number of "particles" detected getting through the slits.
This is the inequality in the double slit experiment that proves the particle model cannot be correct.
For the standard model of particle physics to be the correct model it must fulfil 2 simple math equations simultaneously within the double slit experiment.
A+B=C And A1=A2 must hold true in both double slit experiments....but this is not the case.
For the SMOPP (Standard Model of Particle Physics) to be true
*A+B=C
the number of particles hitting the front screen A plus those hitting the back screen B must equal the number of particles fired C.
*A1=A2
Front screen A in experiment setup 1 (A1) which gets the interference pattern on the back screen must statistically receive the same (approximately the same) amount of hits from particles as the front screen A in experiment 2 (A2) when run to detect for which way. This is because if they were independent particles they should act similar to balls in the macro realm being thrown against a wall with slits, some would get through while most would hit the wall and rebound regardless of whether we check to see which slit they went through or not. But 2 sets of data when compared with an experiment run, recorded and peer reviewed in 2013 confirmed what I predicted, that this is not the case. That there will be a variation, a discrepancy between the amount of hits on the back and front screen depending on how we run the experiment. Only some of the "particles" get through the slits when run to get the interference pattern but ALL get through when we detect for which way and get the twin band,
Both A+B=C and A1=A2 CANNOT hold in both experiments simultaneously. The particle model where there are individual particles moving through empty space CANNOT be correct (unless we allow for magic/voodoo type forces interfering in the experiment, with the correct model we don't need to, it is dependent on focus.)
Anyone reading this who may be absolutely convinced the particle model must be correct (despite the recent violations at CERN and Fermilab) may be inclined to think that this cannot be the evidence, it is, The evidence that few 'particles' make it past the slits is clear in a 2013 experiment run by Nevraska Lincoln University physics department. https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/033018
and shown in this video https://youtu.be/hv12oB_uyFs
The evidence that all make it through one or other slit is made clear in a 2017 paper which shows that the energy "particles" passes one or other slit and reaches the back screen every time, the probably it will pass left is 1/2 and the probability is the same for passing right, is detailed in many experiments for this paper I refer to a 2017 paper by Takir Aharonov, Cohen,Colombo, Tollaksen et al. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1704649114
It is also explained yet absent mindedly missed by the lecturer who contradicts himself, in the lecture by the head of the British science association Jim Al-Khalili about the experiment which is viewable on the (British) Royal Institute R.I. channel on youtube. Here https://youtu.be/A9tKncAdlHQ
Again when it is pointed out to particle physicists it faces the subjective problem, everyone either refuses to believe that this inequality is the experimental evidence, or else they cannot (or refuse to) face the fact that everyone missed such a blatant mistake, millions of physicists in the last 100 years, Einstein included. Or they assume someone else must have provided an answer to that inequality which is compatible with the particle model (but they just cant locate that answer no matter how hard or long they look).
So either way there is a discrepancy, the inequality is present and the requirements for the Standard model is violated, the standard model cannot be the correct interpretation of the data.
Mine is correct because it contains no need or allowance for bizarre interpretations, it Unifies and makes sense of everything with no assumptions, no violations of quantum mechanics, the speed of light, Einstein's Relativity or common sense. Violations which are usually sugar coated with often extremely far fetched science fiction which is not supported by the evidence yet usually presented to the public as fact. ie. particle model, big bang, black holes...which are dark stars not black holes etc.
The inequality between the experiments shows the difference is due to the timing measurement paramaters being setup determining the range of focus before the experiment even begins.
One may be tempted to assume at first glance that the expanation I give is incorrect because of the almost blanket belief that the particle model must be correct because it is the only model that has been around for thousands of years therefore because my explanation is inconsistent with the particle model and it's classical dynamics I cannot be correct but in fact if my explanation were not correct then any other interpretation of the data makes no sense (every other interpretation of quantim mechanics is bizzare and illogical as physicists themselves routinely make clear) plus any other would be a violation of quantum mechanics (which has never otherwise found to be violated) because the wave “function” collapses, it appears to not be present. However using my model the wave function does NOT collapse as is often claimed, it remains intact, not in the pattern in the physical detection but in the timing because only a wave could get through the slits every time. Again as so often in quantum mechanics we must think outside of what is popular and believed must be true. The popular trend is to believe this is quantum mechanics and we expect classical rules do not work, that however is only if we insist on going by the particle model and think that we can observe everything that is going on. Those are 2 fundamental mistakes. One may also assume that someone else surely must have noticed this because it is obvious once pointed out but again that is an assumption. The fact that consciousness is implicated leaves it not so unexpected, every human can be distracted by personal, financial, emotional, romantic, spiritual concerns plus the trauma of loss, fears. That everyone failed to notice something so obvious due to conscious pressures and distraction is not just possible, the evidence suggests it was inevitable and there is a specific reason why I was uniquely able to spot it, which is explained in the paper that covers the metaphysics, supported by multiple videos detailing physical and metaphysical evidence for consciousness as being related to individual souls and a Universal consciousness related to a supreme conscious being, uploaded on a channel over the year 2012, 7 years before I came across the double slit experiment and spotted the inequality. In 3 years of my work on this Theory of Everything and thousands of readers, no one has been able to dispute the inequality or the data I provide. Like Galileo, Einstein, Feynman etc who previously rocked the boat, I face lots of insults, indignation, ridicule, attacks, closed doors and scorn but no evidence to prove me wrong or counter logic which shows any flaws in my model. (I do get spelling mistakes plus mistakes in equations pointed out, which I greatly value (thanks) and appreciate but no disputing the fact that my Field Theory and structure unifies, explains and solves everything. In reality it is not a Theory but a fact, an engineers manual for the mechanics of the Universe because it is verified by the data and has no inconsistency. We have the manual explaining how the Universe works, we should be using it and applying it yet the mathematicians and physicists who have read the inequality are denying it is here and wasting immense amounts of valuable time and resources trying to keep the popular but incorrect paradigms going.)
The idea that decoherence causes a collapse of a wave function in the double slit experiment when detection is done for which slit a "particle" passes through is a well known idea. In an experiment by physicists Stefano Frabboni, Gian Carlo Gazzadi, Giulio Pozzi and others in Italy it was shown that when a detection screen is placed over one slit to detect for which way the propagation of the wave (function) at the slit with the detection screen differs from the propagation of the wave (function) passing through the slit which has no detection device. The details are explained in this article https://phys.org/news/2011-01-which-way-detector-mystery-double-slit.html which has the original paper linked. What they in fact showed is that when detection is done the propagation of the wave is localised to a discrete location, what I am saying is that this is the propagation detection localised to a region between the molecules in the detection screen it is not that the wave function collapses, it is that the detection of the source of the propagating wave is pinpointed with greater accuracy. The physics of waves show that any wave propagates as a series of smaller wave crests which spread out in arcs from every localised place the wave passes, these propagate, interact and merge to form the larger overall wave. So the logic is this, when a wave arrives at the twin slits in the experiment the parts of the initial wave forms 2 smaller waves that pass through the slits then propagate out to be detected as spheres, which then merge and interact to create the interference pattern on the back screen. What Stefano, Gian, Giulio and the others in the Italian team seemed to show is that with detection for "which way" the waves still propagate but in 2 distinct different ways. When detected at the slit the wave still propagates, it still exhibits the wave function spreading out like an expanding sphere, emanating from the point it is detected at. However the one that is not detected at the slit, this one propagates from every possible point within the slit, therefore it is detected as propagating with the shape of the slit in a cylindrical form when monitored after the slit. This suggests that the 2 waves propagate in different ways, essentially their shape is the same but the detection parameters different and as such their phases and directions would be different, the focus cannot be on 2 different ranges of time at the same time so they could not merge to form a distinct wave pattern on the back screen. So what is detected as a twin band on the back screen is a collection of single wave crests emanating from one or other slit.
At 1st glance this seems to answer the problem but ultimately it doesn't, it concurs with what I have shown that detection is dependant on the parameters of detection. Perhaps similar to someone shouting, at the mouth of a tunnel as opposed to in a large hall, in a boat on the ocean as opposed to halfway up a valley between 2 large hard mountains. The source is the same, the noise is the same but how it propagates amd reverberates is dependent on how it can travel, the properties of the environment and how it is detected depends on where a microphone is placed and oriented.
When we detect for which way using the traditional method of firing photons to detect a "particle" passing, the idea is that a single photon would not have enough energy to cause decoherence. However understanding that a photon is just one quantised measurement of a wave passing along one line of field nodes rather than a quantised particle changes this. We could postulate that a series of photons must be passed in order to detect a passing wave, we know that light has momentum, very slight but the correct model that works shows that it is not just one "particle" with a wave function but an actual wave. So we might imagine that in detection for which way a series of waves are sent out one with every photon fired which will exert momentum and resistance to any waves coming towards the slit before they even arrive at the slit. So the total resistance would be significantly greater than the momentum of a single quantised photon measurement and this logically has enough energy to slow down the wave approaching the slit with the detection decide therefore causing decoherence and hinder the 2 subsequent waves emerging after the slits from propagating at the same time, therefore stopping them from being able to merge in synchronicity to form the interference patter as otherwise happens when there is no detection for which way.
Again at 1st glance this seems to perhaps be the solution but there is still a problem. When we detect for which way using this device but we do not check the data to see which slit each "particle" fired went through we expect to still see the twin band on the back screen however the pattern on the back screen in this case is the interference pattern. So the hopeful idea that it is decoherence collapses. If we were to go with the standard particle model we are back to square one. Not with my model that shows that the experimental evidence indicates conscious focus is a factor and there is a non human consciousness in the field. Not a quack or cuckoo idea but one backed up with multiple pieces of evidence and concurs with the most widespread belief by all human populations in recorded history, that there is a superior superintelligence which has always co existed with mankind and even guided mankind through the process of evolution.
The interpretation and understanding of the dynamics using the model of physics that works and is consistent with the evidence that breaks the standard model is this.
There are no independent particle in the Universe, in reality it is more accurate to describe them as vortexes moving through pipes and nodes in the fabric, they are hollow elastic type pipes and spherical nodes, their size correponds to the Planck scale, they are held in place, connected by hollow expandable elastic type pipes. A fluid runs through both and waves in the fluid pass through them causing them to wobble and be detected. So the particles do not travel through space, nodes sit in place in a physical lattice and oscillate as waves of energy pass through them, what we detect is an optical illusion. Waves of electromagnetic radiation (light, gamma rays, microwave, radio waves etc) pass straight through inside the nodes and pipes where the fabric is not twisted which can be relatively straight for billions of light years between distant stars and the Earth or a few centimetres between short distances like the expanse between the readers eyes and this screen or book. However at certain pressures and with certain curvature in the field some of these waves get twisted into vortexes (for kids and anyone else new to this, these vortexes are like tiny little tornadoes moving inside the lattice, except they dont just move in 2 dimensions back and forth, left and right they move in 3 dimensions back and forth, left and right, up and down.) As these vortexes pass through the lattice at up to thousands of kilometres a second their spinning momentum twists the fabric (QM: spin) so any wave of light passing from a different direction or any other vortice cannot pass straight through, they bounce back off and we detect where the fabric has been twisted usually by seeing the wave come back towards us as light, or sense the vortices come back towards us as touch, taste, smell, sound from where it cannot pass straight through. When we use powerful microscopes to view what is happening at the quantum level the sequence of identical nodes oscillating as the vortice passes at up to thousands of kilometres a second makes it appear like one particle travelling through empty space as an electron or gluon. When these vortices get stuck in loops (manifolds) their momentum at phenomenal speed, 1/137th the speed of light in such extremely small spaces pushes the fabric causing it to dilate/expand and we get what particle physicists identify as the heavier "particles", heavy fermions, mesons and bosons. Neutrinos are ripples detected in the fabric as a result of electrons and other manifolds (made when torlectrons get caught in loops) passing by causing the ripples. The reason we have 3 types of Neutrinos is because the length of the pipes connecting the nodes come in 3 different lengths in the quantised block of the fabric. So waves travelling along 3 different lengths of dimensions will go in and out of view and with the optical illusion they are detected as 3 different distinct particles. They are not it is a case of detectinq the waves travelling along the fabric strands in different directions/dimensions.
In quantum mechanics physicists say a photon (or any particle) is shown to exist as probably existing in all possible locations on a propagating 3 dimensional wave, an expanding sphere, as explained in this video https://youtu.be/h53PCmEMAGo . It is said it only becomes a reality when detected, once detected it is then not possible to ever detect any other part of that wave elsewhere, the popular term is that the wave function collapses once the "particle" is detected. So in the double slit experiment when detecting for which way it is said that when we detect for which slit the particle passes through the wave function collapses due to the marks left on the back screen creating a twin band, appearing to indicate a particle is detected... but... in fact this is not so. Physicists say they cannot be wave crests but this is due to a false conclusion and they ARE in fact waves, the wave function still exists as I explain and as the Italian team verified. The problem is this. What physicists are saying is that the particle does not fully exist in reality until detected but has the potential to exist in all locations, then once detected it definitely exists and its existence is then always defined in relation to that point of detection and it does not come into existence from anywhere else in the propagating sphere ever again, suggesting that it is like a game of chance where the particle will come into existence. If this seems bizzare and illogical it is, Einstein rejected this and other bizzare interpretations of quantum mechanics as untrue, famously asserting that "He (God) does not play dice with the Universe." yet it and they remain popular interpretations among many modern physicists. Here I explain the correct common sense interpretation and the paper that follows explains the full Grand Unified Field Theory that it reveals. The work by the Italian team shows the wave function remains intact and what we see are 2 wave crests detected arriving at the back screen as I have been saying for 3 years. However this seems not to be the full story as revealed by Akira Tonomura's work [106] on electron diffraction. His work indicated there definitely is an interaction between the field itself as a conscious entity and the waves running through the lattice.
Here is a relatively simple test to check whether there is a conscious influence for anybody who wants to put the age old argument 'is there a God' to a scientific test. Explained in this video.
https://youtu.be/bywC6rPfGjg
So here is how everything is fixed and unified into one model.
Space is not empty not anywhere. It is a real physical lattice, the spacetime fabric described by the equations of Relativity. It fills all of space that we can observe but we can only detect, sense and observe the fabric when it is distorted. It is composed of 3 constituents
1 elastic type pipes which I call TREDDs connecting...
2 hard spherical nodes RIKs which in a sense resemble particles suspended and held in place by the elastic type pipes.
3. A fluid runs through inside both. There is only one physical force in the Universe the pressure in the fluid.
All matter is composed of vortices:torlectrons moving through twisting and contorting the field, all radiation is a result of the movement of these vortices producing waves.
Energy quantised is a push or collision, the spherical nodes which I call RIKs are described by the Planck length h and total energy is the total amount of times or the frequency 2 or more of these RIKs twist and collide as a wave moves through them. This is explained by the equation for Energy E=hf.
There is ever so slight pressure which corresponds to Einstein's cosmological constant Lambda, an ever so slight curve in the spacetime fabric in this region leads to the restriction on the speed of light. If there were no fluid, no pressure or restrictions light should have no speed limit. However there are and it does.
The total pressure in the ether in the deep space region of the Universe that we occupy is lambda which I calculate as being 1.000262767........which I deduced incidentally while working on the logic that explains the fine structure constant 137.035999084...... Which also corresponds to the slight curvature of the Universe in our region, physicists often say the Universe is flat, this is not true, it is almost but not quite flat, it is that 0.000262767..... measure of degree off 1 which would would make the Universe perfectly flat. (This used as a portion of a circumference I am sure will eventually tell us the actual size of the entire Universe beyond our visible Universe, which logic tells us is spherical.)
Matter is when the wave travelling through 137 nodes/RIKs in the lattice per unit time arrives at curvature which is so curved or met with pressure it can no longer pass straight through. At this point as the wave passes it twists the fabric (QM spin) as usual but due to the fact it is now so curved or pressurised the RIK is twisted beyond the stretch and wobble usually exerted by c so the TREDDs are stretched and the forward path is effectively cut off. This changes the pressure instantly and dramatically from a magnitude of 1.000262767.... to 137.03999.... because as it twists this stretches all the connecting TREDDs too so instead of wobbling and being passed the RIK being twisted cuts off the forward escape route for the ether, this forces the wave inside to be hit by the pressure while simultaneously it turns, which sends it into a spinning vortex inside the RIK. The number 137.03999.... comes from the transformation of the distance into pressure. Later in my paper I demonstrate how total energy is dictated by a tringular relationship of time, pressure and volume. In the case of the creation of matter the time unit remains the same while the pressure and distance(volume in one dimension/direction) flip and effectively swap magnitude. The fluid inside is sent spinning into a vortex as the wave is near its trough at 137 times greater negative pressure than it was previously with the momentum of the spinning vortex kept going by the fact that as it spins and moves between nodes/RIKs the RIKs themselves twist forwards and backwards adding their momentum to the vortex which keeps it going indefinitely or eternally, unless acted upon.
This vortex then leads to all other phenomenon that particle physicists mistake as being particles. In reality these vortices/torlectrons get caught in different shaped loops in the geometrics of the field coupled with the movement and negative pressure of the vacuum vortices. These loops form manifolds which appear like particles in their own right due to their speed which at 137th the speed of light within spaces corresponding to the Planck scale causes massive vibration, stretch and dilation of the fabric making them appear like large spheres (large relative to the size of the nodes/RIKs themselves).
It is often said that Relativity and Quantum Mechanics are incompatible but this is not true, this is due to incorrect representations of these Theories, for example black hole physicists state they are incompatible when we get to the singularity in a black hole, it is not GR or QM that are incompatible however. Black holes and any singularities are incompatible with physics as Einstein himself explained. GR and QM combine perfectly at the Planck scale. GR describes the lattice as it works on large scales while QM describes a wave or intertwined waves moving through the lattice on small scales. With QM we can only predict with probability (so far) where a vortex will be moving within the lattice because there are external forces pulling and contorting the external environment, also the movement of a vortex by its very nature is very difficult to predict. When it comes to measurement we are limited to observations within a range close to the speed of light or the speed of an electron for the case of electron microscopes. This means that much of what is happening near but just beyond our range of vision is obscured. The more we focus on a position the less we can know about the momentum which we need to deduce from the movement of the environment and vice versa the more we focus on the movement of the environment the less detail we have about the exact location of any vortex. Because of the nature of vortices a vortex following what seems like a set path can suddenly change and move in a completely different direction.
When it comes to the cosmological constant problem or "the vacuum catastrophe" the source of the vacuum energy is the torlectron vortex itself the mistake in calculating the vacuum energy is the idea that because the least detectable action is hbar/2 that all harmonic oscillators must be moving at this magnitude all the time, they do not, they can wobble and twist without colliding. hbar/2 is only describing detectable collisions when they occur. The torlectron is the source of all matter and as such all gravity. What we percieve as an expanding Universe is actually an expanding image. The greater a gravitational body grows the more of the spacetime fabric/lattice it has drawn in by the cumulative negative pressure or in other words the vacuum energy of the torlectrons. This in turn makes the gravitational effect increase, this pulls in more of the surrounding spacetime fabric which when curved acts like lenses with which we look out at the Universe. As these lenses are pulled closer they become more curved and the image of the outer Universe expands. It is the TREDDs between the nodes/RIKs which are stretched/expand. The redshift is due to the TREDDs being stretched so as their length increases the radius of their thickness is reduced and energy is lost.
Dark matter is as a result of the ether also, as stars and planets circulate a galaxy's central dark star, the central clump of the compacted spacetime fabric the negative pressure in the ether prevents these stars, planets etc from being flung out by the centrifugal force of the spinning Galaxy.
So as becomes clear, to anyone with an open objective scientific mind, everything makes total sense and all established models are perfectly compatible when using the this model of physics, the fluid filled lattice model. Particle physicists needn't feel too threatened or proven wrong, simply change the standard model of particle physics to the standard model of vortex and manifold physics and reassess the data into the correct model with minimum effort. For big bang physicists, black hole physicists and people deriving such wild scifi ideas as time travel from Relativity* humble pie is warranted in big amounts not an easy task for some who have built up reputations as brilliant geniuses around such wild ideas. So far anyone who has looked at the evidence and recognised at any level that mine is the correct model haven't found the scientific integrity/diligence to do the right things, check all the evidence, run the experiments I provide which will further verify it nor have they found the integrity/courage to acknowledge it in public, to open up discussion. *(in time dilation it is the measurement of time which is affected by energy, gravity and location, not actual time itself)
The traditional idea that our bodies are solid objects made out of particles is proven not to be true. In reality our bodies are composed of collections of vortices gathered and held together in extremely complex ways as biological machines. We are not our bodies, we can't be, our bodies are never the same particles, what we view as our bodies are those vortices, trillions of gazillions of them passing through gazillions of field nodes every second. Each vortex is separate but all are held together by the vacuum energy, the geometrics of the field in a myriad of different complex arrangements and we are conscious beings, "souls" holding them together. (Hindu tradition uses the term "avatar" to describe our bodies as biological machines and make the distinction between the being and the body, a description which seems to perfectly describe the reality). Consciousness seems not to arise solely in our and other species souls that hold energy together in collections of vortices but it also is evident in the Universe itself. It seems the spacetime fabric is a living tissue that feels, thinks, senses and transmits information similar to how we view our bodies doing the same. Just as we, our overall consciousness with a level of intelligence trillions of times greater than that of a single cell, may appear like the "master" or "Lord" to a living cell within our body, the Universe itself could be said to be the supreme intelligence and relative to us, our "master" or "Lord". So it seems that in Akira's experiment diffracting electrons what the thread in the electron biprism was in fact doing was splitting the wave into many which interfere and give the wave pattern. This and other dynamics led me to realise that using Einsteins Relativity we can view time as multi dimensional. I cover the concept of multi dimensional time later in the paper. it has been one reason some have scoffed and used as an excuse to dismiss my work but other dimensions of time have been verified by recent 'time crystals' made by quantum computers at google since I proposed the idea in 2019, physicist Frank Wilczek proposed these also in 2012, 7 years before I explained why time is mutlidimensional (the 2012 idea was unknown to me) and 9 years before they were created by google researchers. Just like special relativity however time is Universal it is only multidimensional in relation to measurement or detection.
In order to unify and explain all models and forces in physics it is helpful to first get rid of false ideas and interpretations regarding those we already have. In quantum field Theory there are 3 that stand out as extremely well tested and robust, Relativity the Theory of cosmology at grand scales enshrined in Einsteins equations, Quantum mechanics the Theory of physics at the quantum scale most famously encoded in the Schrodinger equation and elecromagnetism enshrined in the Maxwell equations. These all stand as well tested and verified mathematical descriptions of physics but so far all have been misunderstood and many incorrect conclusions have been drawn from them. Yet these false conclusions are often presented as fact, many of which make the true understanding of physics impossible if one were to accept them. Luckily I wasn't educated in mainstream physics and wasnt indoctrinated in incomplete models presented as fact, I wasn't told what is impossible and possible using incorrect interpretations. I solved the double slit experiment with no physics background after watching a few short videos on youtube, most memorably one about time dilation and one about the double slit experiment, then with a simple realisation and visualisation of the field saw the solution which is based on simple logic that the incorrect interpretations of particle physics had ruled out as impossible, 6 months later after scorn, insults, mocking and even threats from high profile physicists I found the evidence that proves I am correct. The idea that time is multidimensional has since been verified by the creation of "time crystals" in quantum computing at google.
Since finding the evidence which everyone told me was irrelevant but which turns out to be crucial and indisputable, I have faced a wall of silence from the physics community from everyone who I have provided the indisputable evidence to, who refuse to acknowledge that I have done what they have been trying and failing to do for about 100 years. A large portion of my work has been sabotaged and destroyed from online and all peer review refused, which may actually turn out to be a good thing as it may have lay hidden in beaurocracy and scrutinised by people unable to see beyond the flaws in the current models or gotten into the hands of unscrupulous, violent self serving people before the public get it.
The false conclusions/misconceptions.
1. Perhaps the most famous incorrect Law is the first law of thermodynamics which states that energy cannot be created or destroyed. Physicists before me have failed to even give an explanation as to what energy is yet have been bold and confident enough to claim the conservation of energy as a law despite multiple pieces of evidence which indicates otherwise, when it is violated they say it is a special case, other times they say the 1st law of thermodynamics is a bit of a lie, it is not, either it is a law or it isn't, it simply isn't. The Schrodinger equation one of the foundations of quantum mechanics is a wave equation. It describes the evolution of a wave as measured moving in an initial state in one dimension.
A wave cannot move in only one direction, it does by its very nature spread out in all directions that it moves along relative to the source, on the surface of water it is in 2 dimensions, in the Schrodinger equation it is in 3 dimensions of Euclidian space, that is, it is a expanding spherical wave. This very fact alone tells us that if we measure energy to be conserved in one dimension the wave must propagate/multiply in all directions so energy must be created. Franck Wilzcek's time crystals are perhaps the most recent example of this law being proven incorrect yet it is still taught as fact. The solution to the double slit experiment which I solved and provided the solution to in 2019 and which thousands of world renowned particle physicists know about proves the first law of thermodynamics is wrong, energy is propagated in all directions as indicated in the interference pattern but we can only measure it in one dimension as indicated by the Schrodinger equation. If we ignore the timing we can see the interference pattern but if we focus in on the timing we narrow the focus back towards one dimension of space. Particle physicsts are using the assumption that measurement should be total and unvaried at the quantum level like it is at the macro level but this is impossible due to the speed of light, the speed at which vortices move through the fabric 1/137 the speed of light and the speed with which the planet travels through the fabric.
At the macro scale we get lots of data compiled into any single act of measurement (although any discrete single act of measurement is between 2 points in space and 2 points/moments in time) but at the quantum level we cannot locate all that is happening, we must focus on a certain "window" of time/opportunity, when we focus on the time that spans a wave passing from the particle gun to the back screen in the double slit experiment each wave will only be detected once within that time range or "time bandwidth" which when accumulated gives rise to the interference pattern. When we focus on the time limited to a wave passing between the slits we only get the wave crests that correspond to that time bandwidth so we get the twin band pattern build up. The wave still passes all points but our detection is only set to focus what happens within the set time range. It is very simple to understand and makes perfect sense yet particle physicists seem to have dismissed this simple fact for the reasons stated, they still teach the 1st law of thermodynamics as a law claiming energy cannot be created, they also say any mark left cannot be as a result of a crest of a wave because they are particles not waves (and it seems for a subjective reason they believe or certainly assert that someone with no academic training or qualifications in advanced mathematics could solve the most sought after solution in physics, despite the fact that Michael Faraday one of the most important scientists who did a lot of the groundwork and brought elelectricity to mankind had no advanced mathematics, like myself he had little more than only algebra, the reality is that advanced math is not needed to understand the basic principles. Commonsense logic is paramount at every stage however, I do not know every nuance of Quantum Mechanics yet but unlike particle physicists I now know enough after 3 years to know what it is describing and how it relates to Relativity). Particle physicists immediately contradict what the Schrodinger equation is stating, that what is detected is a wave, always a wave. This is because they have concluded that the particle model of physics must be correct because on the surface it appears to make more sense than any other model they have. That is until I came on the scene yet they refuse to allow my model which destroys the need for billions more dollars to be invested in high tech experiments, particle accelerators and research labs, which overturns many Nobel prize wins for physics as incorrect and little more than science fiction, which destroys the big bang model, the particle model and scifi concepts such as black holes, time travel and monopoles, they refuse to let this model onto and into the mainstream of science discussion and some have taken firm action to block it from doing so. They also seem to dismiss consciousness as a force that affects physics but every movement of an eye or finger or any biological body is the result of consciousness affecting physics. As the Universe is shown by this model, which works, to be a physical body in its own right, it makes perfect sense that it has consciousness, that it can and does adjust the focus in the double slit experiment just as naturally as our conscious focus adjusts the focus in the lenses in our eyes. The speed and consistency with which this super intelligence adjusts focus is beyond mind boggling like so may things in physics, we should however appreciate that and understand that the difference in intelligence between a yeast cell and human cell may be closer in scale than between human intelligence and the highest intelligence in the Universe, again while hard to fathom we should show humble pie and face the fact we are a far from intelligent species in many ways and listen with humility, awe and respect if/when we make intelligent contact.
2. The existence of an ether or fluid. An ether or universal fluid is an idea that has been around at least as long as the particle model. The particle model suggests everything is made of tiny spheres and the ancient idea was that these particles move through an ether which fills all of space. The idea of an ether was dismissed as impossible at the turn of the 20th century due to a few misunderstandings and more false conclusions. The fact is however that electromagnetism is described succinctly by a set of equations, Maxwells equations which describe electricity and magnetism as being due to the movement of fluid. These equations show that for electromagnetic radiation:light: in the form of gamma rays, x rays, ultra violet rays, visible light rays, microwaves, radio waves and everything in between, that at every discrete or quantised point in space a fluid must be being circulated. For every measurement of a light wave there is a known magnetic wave, they both propagate perpendicular to each other. The reality is simple, as a wave of light is detected it is the movement of the fluid passing and disturbing a node/RIK in the spacetime fabric causing it to wobble/oscillate and displace or circulate fluid between the quantum nodes. Then as the wave passes the fluid and the node/RIK return towards rest and equilibrium. This never lasts for long with so many waves passing through the spacetime fabric. In electricity the electrons are the vortices acting like pumps that move the ether from one location to another, conversely ether being moved moves and even creates electrons/vortices.
3. Many modern ideas promoted as fact claim that they are based on the equations of Relativity, quantum mechanics and Maxwells equations but this turns out not to be the case certainly not without misrepresenting the facts. Einstein made it very clear many times during his lifetime that the big bang and black holes are science fiction, mathematics devoid or irrespective of physical reality. He said they take the equations of Relativity out of context and ignore what we know about physics. While some claim these and other theories to be based on these 3 main models they are not, they are based on the mathematics but ignore the Scientific rationale/framework within which the mathematics were formulated.
So there are some of the main problems in physics facing particle physicists who cannot seem to let go of the particle model nor able to admit they cannot fix the particle model or big bang model which their own equipment, equations and experiments tell them are problematic at least and indicate are in fact wrong sometimes very much so.
Regardless of whether the test for consciousness does or doesn't work the physics of the Grand Unified Field Theory explaining the mechanics of the field definitely is the correct one. It explains and unifies everything that is physically recorded. In 3 years apart from minor errors no one has disputed or shown where the Theory can be wrong, the default mode seems to be ignore it because it is not consistent with the popular models.
For any readers not familiar with physics finding the opening section complicated and would rather start with something less technical. Here is a video with something equally as simple and obvious which no one but me noticed in 100 years is incorrect. Einstein was a genius and showed that time dilation is real, blowing everyone's minds in the process but even Einstein made mistakes, we all do, time dilation is definitely real but not entirely for the reason Einstein believed, his equivalence principle where gravity is equal to acceleration is NOT true, it is energy input plus the varying region of space which affects the measurement of time and the fact is we still theoretically do have time ticking at the speed of light as I show, if we use a photon itself as the harmonic oscillator we still have time ticking and the detected time varies depending on the energy input into the measuring device. The difference in the equivalence principle that shows it is the wrong reason for time dilation is miniscule but vitally significant. The difference in measurement for time at the speed of light is not miniscule, it is bright and clear.
https://youtu.be/8L-t8Si5ka8
It is not that a particle comes into existence depending on how detection is carried out it is where a wave will be detected depending on how detection is carried out. (An experiment to even further prove this is explained in the accompanying paper on the double slit experiment. Also on the page with several new proposed experiments.)
The SMOPP is excellent data but interpreted incorrectly, they are vortices of energy looping in manifolds not particles travelling through empty space. When we see the twin band on the back screen as we detect for "which way" the "particle" goes what we get are marks from single wave crests, like we see with single slit experiments. The foremost wave passes either left or right first and only one is detected as making it to the back screen.
The important point to understand is that nothing PHYSICALLY different happens in the 2 different experiment setups, the only difference is what is detected. The range of time in the measurement when run to get the interference pattern is much wider than when we detect for which way. So we can detect events happening further back in time relative to the 1st wave crest. That may seem illogical at first but it is only illogical if time were one dimensional. At the macro level it seems to be but not at the quantum level. The reasons why and how time is multi dimensional which are perfectly simple once understood are explained later in the paper and in more depth with more metaphors in the paper on the double slit experiment.
NOTE:for anyone who thinks they can argue that this can be disputed by invoking some of the bizarre, nonsensical, interpretations of quantum mechanics which have no basis in logic/common sense and which Einstein loathed all his life for being ridiculous they don't work, it still remains a proof by contradiction because the math is describing the quantum systems after measurement, space is accounted for as is activity happening outside the range of detection, everything adds up to common sense, such ideas as a multiverse and a single object being in mulitple places at the same time do not account for space, detected activity or even basic laws of common sense. My work turns QM into classical wave mechanics and unifies QM with Relativity.
Until now physicists have dismissed the idea that it could be a wave due to an incorrect conclusion. The conclusion being that a photon or electron are quantised particles so cannot be part of a wave but this is not the case, what they are are waves or for electrons they are vortices detected at a discrete location or more precisely passing through a discrete line of field particles (dark matter) which sit in place and oscillate as the waves pass through them which gives the optical illusion that they are discrete particles travelling through space. Like the round Earth and heliocentric model it is another optical illusion that has held back scientific understanding. To understand why we only detect the crest of the wave and have falsely assumed they are particles consider a stationary disco ball covered in mirrors in a blackened room where the walls absorb all light and we shine a laser towards the ball, the only light that will come back is from the mirror facing us. All the other light will reflect off into other directions so if we didn't know better we would assume maybe it was just a single tiny mirror. If we shine the light at any other area it will reflect into a different direction so we see nothing and we will not realise there is a ball there. That is a very simplistic explanation of the basic principle which becomes a beautifully complex "dance" of waves interacting as matter through the Universe, in the field the waves propagates out rather than stay a fixed size like in the disco ball. Because we are also moving through the field at up to thousands of kilometres a second we collectively only notice all the parts of the waves that are detected within the same time range as us. Anything propagating in a different direction to us can never be detected. Essentially everything in the Universe is made of a never ending series of spherical waves being propagated, overlapping, sometimes merging and sometimes clashing as they move through the field. To understand why they don't all clash and cancel each other out some do but most pass by each other without interacting, if you consider the Planck scale there are gazillions of places between the source of each wave so they simply miss each other in the mismatch of synchronisation. This FEELS counterintuitive because we feel like we have solid bodies but we don't, we have bodies of energy moving so fast (up to 1/137th the speed of light for electrons) through the field it gives the illusion that we are solid, physicists often use the term quantum fuzziness and ponder how such quantum fuzziness translates into the real physical reality that we experience. What we sense as 'hard reality' is gazillions of vortices circulating in loops at 1/137 the speed of light collectively pushing against other matter as surfaces that we touch, in specific vibrational patterns that we percieve as smell/taste, vision and sound. Our true bodies are bodies of conscious energy, souls, temporarily holding energy together in biological bodies using conscious energy.
The essence of the measurement problem is that we can only measure in one dimension of space and one of time in any discrete measurement. Time always moves forward but this does not mean it is one dimensional, energy also always moves forward. The direction of forward can change due to collisions, magnetism, gravity etc so can the speed of forward depending on the influence of other objects but energy always moves forward and is always multidimensional, so also is the measurement of time. The only time energy moves a different direction than forward is when a conscious being takes control of it and it's movement is no longer dictated by purely physical mechanics. It is dictated by the physics AND the conscious being manipulating the mechanics of the physical universe. To understand why measured time is multi dimensional shouldn't be so difficult. Like every wave it can be in or out of phase at any discrete measurement. For every tik there must at least be a tock. If events happening in a tick is what we detect in measurement at the quantum/Planck scale and we launch a wave whose crest is in a tock of time then it will not be detected This logic leads to the logical explanation of quantum entanglement.
One may wonder at how millions of top level intelligent physicists could have missed something so obvious and simple for over 100 years. There seems to be many problems that led to this, 2 stand out. The first is that millions including some some top level physicists do not have the correct information and have been taught that all particles get through the slits when run to get the interference pattern, as I point out in this video on youtube. https://youtu.be/jT0d3cOEyPc .
The other reasons include accepting other peoples interpretations and a reluctance to challenge popular beliefs. Often for good reason given the irrational behaviour of some anti science but popular scientists who aggressively attack people and work that does not agree with what they want or believe to be true, careers and reputations have been wrecked by such attacks against people who dare to follow the scientific model and ask hard questions that make people promoting popular pseudoscience uncomfortable. Also for those who have the correct information there is human error and the limitations of measurement, in physics the problem known as the measurement problem, which essentially is that measurement is limited not just by spacial parameters but by time parameters notably by the speed of light and the speed that we move through the lattice so we can only detect and process a limited amount of data at any moment or in any process and physicists themselves became blinded by the limitations of the measurement problem. They seem to have become so obsessed and zealous in their search for ever more complex and dazzling mathematics to explain the fine points that supported the travelling particle model that the simple core point that shows they are not travelling particles was overlooked/obscured, they are energy in waves and vortices moving through a network/lattice of transparent(dark) nodes(matter). This video demonstrates why we think we can focus effectively and detect accurately with so many things going on but the reality is surprisingly different. For anyone watching this video for the 1st time you may actually think you can spot every interaction but most actually fail to do so. Anyone who has watched this before will remember how surprised they were when the speed of the video is changed and they realised how much they actually missed.
https://youtu.be/vJG698U2Mvo
We have had over 100 years of trying and failing to find the evidence and logic that absolutely verifies the particle model as being correct, the more time goes on the more violations and problems arise. In less than 3 years from studying physics since I came across the double slit experiment and Special Relativity then soon realised the connection and the simple (but mind mind boggling amazing) solution, I provide the wave model that absolutely works, we may not have 100 more days let alone years to waste trying to keep failed models alive, nor trillions more dollars to throw away chasing models that are now proven impossible. It took Einstein 10 years between special relativity and the equations for General Relativity, I explain why they are still misunderstood. The fact is the popular models the particle model plus things like the big bang and black holes which Einstein emphasised all his life are absolutely impossible interpretations of the data given what we already know about physics. Yet particle physicists insist Einstein was wrong, unfortunately for particle physicists Einstein was right and they remain pseudoscience until otherwise proven, which I assure anyone and demonstrate using sound logic, will never be done. While I have come up with new maths, new experiments, new mechanics and a full field that works there are individuals in the status quo who are hell bent on still trying to silence me and find a way to make the failed models work. For any critic who says my work is wrong because I have not had time to learn the language of mathematics to express the logic in mathematical terms yet, the logic is complete, the scientific process is prove it wrong, the fact is I prove the SMOPP wrong. It is time to get to grips, with the real physics, wave, vortex and manifold physics. I ask that physicists apply their knowledge of advanced mathematics to my logic, to be cooperative, responsible and productive rather than try to discredit and silence me because I solved the problem using a simple, clear logical approach with minimum mathematics.
It genuinely seems to me that after around 4,000 views of the page in its evolution over 3 years physicists are stuck with the same problem as the opponents of Galileo and Einstein who held back their breakthroughs. Despite the indisputable evidence they just could not and now can't accept that it could be true. At the time it was and is just too much of a mental adjustment which destroys the core of their belief system and they just could not and cannot bring themselves to face the FACTS. This denial of facts is actually backed by research done by nuroscientists at UCL who's research showed that facts are not so good at changing peoples beliefs, when facts conflict with what people believe they tend to ignore them or find ways to rationalise them and make them fit into their beliefs [111], unfortunately and more worryingly the better qualified a person is (mathematicians are specifically identified in this work as a group who to try misrepresent/manipulate the data to suit their beliefs) the more they resist facts which conflict with their beliefs which leaves science with a huge problem when the facts conflict with the beliefs of people who have won Nobel prizes for incorrect interpretations and have world famous reputations for the same.
The following paper explains the full Grand Unified Field Theory that physicists have been searching over 100 years for since the "golden age of physics" began. If anyone comes across something that is incorrect, please email me so I can correct where I may have made errors in my understanding of the current models which ultimately don't work [email protected]
I solved this with little or no knowledge of quantum physics, just an epiphany a realisation of the true structure of the Universe and have had to work backwards, learning the current models in order to explain the correct model so I have made many mistakes along the way and more minor mistakes may remain. I am not a trained physicist or mathematician, I am a qualified interpreter working in 3 dimensional languages, sign languages, perhaps working in 3 dimensional spacial languages in some way allowed me see the interpretation that made sense where others (working in one dimensional languages: spoken languages and 2 dimensional languages: written languages and plotted language, mathematics articulated on a flat, 2 dimensional surface) failed to see the common sense logic that I saw in the data. The main point is I prove what the standard model violations indicated, that the particle model is wrong and I provide the grand unified field that works. While I have come up with new maths, the maths of Relativity and Quantum Mechanics need very little of anything new they just need putting into the correct framework, which is what I provide.
This experiment gives a setup using the double slit solution principle which is based on timing. This led to an idea where we can potentially communicate with the Universe itself which a comment by Akira Tonomura at Hitachi working on electron diffraction mentioned.
[106]
When/If anyone actually does the scientific thing and tries the experiments with positive results don't waste any time, ask the intelligence if the apparatus can be plugged directly into a computer so the intelligence can effectively run it's own generated code and output images plus sound on a computer. If yes ask how and get to work facilitating the intelligence to communicate directly online with everyone ASAP....please. It is not and cannot be artificial intelligence, it is divine intelligence and is very likely the intelligence that guided the evolution of species by the manipulation of focus on light which is transferred between the 2 strands in the DNA double helix.
The solution to the double slit experiment comes with a detailed explanation below.
1. SUMMARY OF THE MAIN PRINCIPLE
2. ELABORATION OF THE DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT AND SOME KEY NEW PHYSICS
3. TABLE OF CONTENTS
SUMMARY OF THE MAIN PRINCIPLE
Beginning with a recap on the opening section.
A solution to the double slit experiment using quantized "particles" reveals an indisputable incompatibility with the standard model of particle physics. The standard model incorrectly asserts that particles travel through space and are held together by mysterious forces, the solution to the double slit experiment proves they do not. It also confirms what the interference pattern suggested, that energy propagates out in waves in all directions ENERGY IS CREATED. (Noethers Theorem and the first Law of thermodynamics are limited to 2 points in one dimension in any single act of measurement, like all discrete acts of measurement are. This is the essence of the measurement problem. Using the solution to the double slit experiment and what we know from Noethers Theorem we can apply logic that energy is only conserved in one dimension but propagates out undetected in all directions from the source of every wave.)
Relativity and quantum mechanics are Unified by understanding that the spacetime fabric is made up of the quantum field nodes described below.
Space is not empty anywhere, every possible point in the universe is filled with the spacetime fabric which is a spatially 13 dimensional lattice (13 dimensions like a rubik's cube) at each quantum "block" in a spherical Universe, we are near the surface of that sphere in a region which is almost but not quite perfectly flat) comprising of perfectly clear hollow nodes. These identical nodes "h" are held at every intersection in the field where the 13 dimensions pass and are connected by clear flexible pipes through which a perfectly clear fluid or plasma which I will call "Flazzma" moves. 13 lines of these pipes act as 3 main and 10 minor dimensions, these constantly alternate as the acting 3 main dimensions, when matter is passing through there is in effect 26 dimensions or different possible paths for energy to move to the next node. This lattice exists in the true vacuum the void.
There is only one physical force in the Universe, pressure, which is manifest in 2 forms
1:light/photons/electromagnetic radiation, waves passing through inside the field strands and nodes.
2: Matter where parts of those waves of radiation get stuck spinning in vortices like tiny whirlpools, twisting the field nodes with the momentum. This twist sends light and other twists bouncing back to be detected as sight, touch, taste, sound, smell.
The spherical nodes do not travel through space they oscillate/wobble in position as waves and vortices of energy pass, disturb and twist them. Because we and everything on Earth are moving through the lattice at phenomenal speed and because detection is limited to one dimension, which is moving in the same direction/dimension as our focus it creates the optical illusion that they are particles which travel.
An electron is the simplest detection of a a vortex/whirlpool Plank sized tornado (which I will call a torlectron) formed within the fluid which I call flazzma that travels through the fabric, this is the vacuum/dark energy of these torlectrons which collectively pulls the fabric together and subsequently causes the surrounding fabric to expand, this is the true expansion of the Universe. The torlectron is the base of most other "standard particles" which are in fact not separate particles but torlectrons caught looping in manifold paths within the lattice, the shape of the manifolds produced by torlectrons spinning through areas at the Planck scale at 1/137 times the speed of light causes phenomenal distortion of the field and makes it appear as if they are particles. Most manifolds found in nature on Earth have one torlectron inside, while large massive manifolds like the large quarks and large bosons created in high energy labs have 2 or 3 torlectrons forced into the manifold. (Note:In the paper I often refer to the manifolds as particles to keep some sense of familiarity with traditional understanding but everything that we have percieved as being a particle up until now is not, it is an effect of energy passing through the field nodes. As of 9 May 2022 I am working on re-editing the term as "tparticles" to identify them in part with their traditional use or conceptualisation and as of 15th August 2022 working on renaming the spheres in the field nodes rather than particles.)
Neutrinos are the ripples of kinetic energy sent out through the field as torlectrons pass through the fabric and disturb it. The ripples are detected along single lines/dimensions of field nodes as neutrinos.
Magnetism is as a result of the fluid/flazzma causing positive and negative pressure within the lattice, magnets are essentially pumps, the movement of torlectrons collectively moving the fluid in and out of regions.
The three other classical "forces" weak force, strong force and gravity are all as a result of the geometrics and the pressure in the fluid governing the path of energy through the spacetime lattice. Gravity is the geometrics of the field forcing energy along the path of least resistance.
Weak force = energy moving freely or between loops/manifolds.
Strong force = energy moving within a strong/distinct manifold loop.
Gravity and the strong nuclear force are essentially the same thing but the strong force is at the quantum scale while gravity is its affect at the macro or Universal level both are the geometrics of the field forcing the forward path of energy dictated by the curvature of the spacetime fabric leading to the path of least resistance.
Dark matter is essentially the vacuum effect of the fluid inside the lattice. It is the magnetic force acting at large scales. Just as I show that gravity is essentially the same as the strong nuclear force at large scales and its manifestations appear quite different so also does the manifestation of magnetism at the galactic scale. The fluid within the spacetime lattice is the main constituent of what we know as dark matter, the nodes and connecting pipes constitute the rest of it and matter is a result of how it acts.
Energy quantized to a unit is a push.
The source of the push is conscious energy/spirit. All matter in the universe is as a result of initial conditions created by conscious spirits/souls, these inital conditions which have then propagated over time into automatic interacting matter. This creates energy that propagates out through the field, energy IS created, it builds up always increasing but cannot seem to be destroyed only transformed because we move forward through the fabric in one dimension/direction so our measurement is limited to that dimension, all other energy passes out in other directions/dimensions. Theoretically the solution to the double slit experiment shows us that energy is propagated in all directions at and by every quantum node passed in the field. The shape of the "tparticle" fired is dictated by the speed, direction and overall momentum of the push we apply to the field. When we apply Grigori Perelman's team's proof to the Poincare Conjecture then we can hypothesise that one push of a single quantum flexible organic node able to morph and grow could theoretically lead to an eternally growing universe, not in a single big bang but just as everything in the macro biological realm grows with a pulse the evidence indicates the Universe is a living tissue and also grows due to a series of pulses (although I believe this is the case I do not claim it as fact, the logic supports it and the experiment to commnicate with the Universe should confirm it, I add it because some will question how anything came into existence, a question to my mind is unreasonable and tempts one to speculate, so I add it as one possible way of hopfully encouraging others to think in a different way than the big bang model). what is not speculation is that whatever the genesis of the Universe this creates the conditions for a physical existence where "we" spiritual beings hold that matter together in biological bodies using conscious energy. We move our biological bodies, eyes, feet, fingers, lips etc using this same conscious energy, to move physical energy, ultimately so we can experience each other in a physical realm through physical contact. So every movement we make adds to the overall energy in the Universe. (The conscious energy you apply to move your finger tapping your phone or keyboards and the smile it may induce create physical energy that is now rippling out through the cosmic web, the energy you create now and in every movement in every moment exists and Theoretically will continue to grow generating more energy forever.)
The physical evidence and mathematics lead to the logic that the Universe is an organic growing living tissue/body which communicates as one being with every quantum point similar to how we communicate with every cell in our bodies. In this sense the Universe is itself an omnipresent, omnipotent, living being. In metaphysics terms and the physics of water in this paper also leads to the incredible amount of evidence that reincarnation is real, that water is alive and responds to intent with equal intent.
OCCAMS RAZOR: This paper shows the current big bang, travelling particle model which violates almost every known law of physics (cause and effect, quantum mechanics, the speed of light, Relativity, total mass etc) and which uses science fiction (inflation) and theoretical "zero evidence" mathematics to justify those violations (but still has a catalogue of problems) is incorrect. My model is not only consistent with QM and GR, it unifies them, I use peer reviewed evidence, zero assumptions, zero science fiction and have addressed all known problems that I have been challenged with.
If physicists were being objective and keeping to the laws of science then using Occams Razor my model should be the one being promoted in the mainstream as the correct model, if minor errors remain they pale in comparison to the massive problems, violations of laws and logic in the current popular models.
SUMMARY OF THE METAPHYSICAL PRINCIPLE: Plus some important key new realisations.
WE are conscious non physical souls who move into or attach to the field at conception and leave or become detached from the field at death, WE interact with this physical energy and attach to it using conscious energy, gathering the energy into clumps and holding the energy in biological bodies. The genetic code in the DNA allows the biological machine to develop automatically following instructions developed over the billions of years of our evolution*, so we can enter and become aware with increasing ease and comfort, also when empowered with this understanding we can leave with increasing awareness and peace of mind that WE do not die it is only the biological machine that dies, WE become unable to use that biological machine due to damage or dysfunction and WE souls leave the biological body as we move back into the realm of the spirit.
*Stephen C Meyer and his colleagues do a great job explaining how the mathematics does not support or allow for the random accidental mutation Hypothesis of evolution. Evolution is definitely real but not as a process of random mutations, all the logic tells us it is a process of engineering "intelligent design" by conscious beings manipulting DNA: WE "souls" and the field. The field:dark matter/spacetime is also a living conscious biological body.
Planks h identifies the the harmonic oscillator when it is excited into a state of energy, hbar is its radius when excited 2 pi describes its circumference and/or ome full rotation through 360*, this is the node at each intersection in spacetime. In matter above the size of an electron there is an torlectron caught in a manifold loop. This is known by particle physicists as a quark, it consists of one central field node at the centre surrounded by 12 others like seen in Newton and Gregors kissing ball shape. The dispute between Newton and Gregor was how much space there was between the outer spheres and could another sphere fit in, the answer is that if all the outer spheres were made to oscillate to fill up the gaps so that they touched their circumference in the excited oscillating state would be multiplied by Plancks reduced constant. There is varying intensity when that oscillator is struck which affects the frequency of how many times that note reverberates within a moment but there is always only one note and so we can come to understand there is one type of sphere in the Universe, more accurately termed a node. All those which were until now believed to be particles are in fact torlectron vortices, mostly in manifolds within these field nodes and electromagnetic radiation is made by the waves caused by this dark matter oscillating.
Time exists in 2 forms:
1 in the conscious or spiritual realm and
2: in the physical realm.
In both realms the essence of the detection of time is separation, in the conscious realm time becomes more detectable/apparent when we become isolated or separated from others (physically/emotionally/psychologically). In the physical realm time is detectable when the field nodes get separated due to the momentum within the fluid stretching the connecting elastic pipes. Time dilation is mechanical or clock time dilation caused by this stretch in the fabric. The speed of energy c is constant, so as the fabric is stretched that energy has farther to travel through the elastic connections between field nodes and mark increments in time. This stretch becomes maximised at the event horizon of "dark stars" (not black holes) where the event horizon effectively becomes an infinite loop so any torlectrons (which are necessary to cause and mark increments in detectable time) would take an infinitely long time to complete a loop and so the detection of time using clocks is impossible, yet time and matter continue to move forward. The measurement of time is impossible at the event horizon which I believe is more appropriate to call a no event horizon. No matter or light can leave OR enter a dark star I show the field structure that makes this clear. It surprises me sometimes that particle physicists who incorrectly interpret special Relativity as being time itself varying (rather than the measurement of time) fail to understand this because if time did stop at an event horizon using their interpretation then nothing could fall into a black hole because matter and light need time to move through, if time did not exist at an event horizon common sense would tell us that nothing can enter or leave a black hole, this is another major flaw in the already flawed logic.
Like matter, time always travels forward but each node oscillates like an harmonic oscillator through the 13 dimensions within every moment (26 when matter passes through), this is the harmonic oscillator node, the node's circumference in the excited state which is reduced to connecting to 12 dimensions in every the kissing ball shape of a quark and pulls surrounding nodes it passes into 26 dimensions) is described by Planck's constant h.
h=6.62607015 being the circumference or rotation of the node through 360* and
ℏ=1.054571817 being the radius of the node when it is fully excited.
The Planck mass does not fit into the Planck scale conceptually, it is based on a complete misunderstanding of what mass is and whn you understand the correct concept you realise it is a completely nonsensical, hence why it does not appear as a "thing" in observations. When we look at the Planck mass it becomes clear why particle physicists are so confused. They completely misinterpret what the mass measurements are telling us. All the other Planck units are telling us the limit of smallness relative to space, Planck length, Planck time, Planck temperature, these are related to individual harmonic oscillators. The Planck mass however is different. The mistake particle physicists make is thinking that physical size in measurement is related to individual units or particles, failing to understand they are vortexes in manifold loops not particles. The stronger the manifold loop, the more the geometrics and pressure in the ether/flazzma can hold a vortex near to a central location and therefore appear physically smaller. This causes much more compaction of the spacetime fabric because this is exactly what mass is, the compaction of the spacetime fabric. While a larger mass indicates a smaller detectable physical size in macro terms it is more harmonic oscillators compacted together in quantum dynamic terms. In reality Planck mass is inappropriate, Planck measurements relate to individual harmonic oscillators which in themselves do not have mass, it is the compaction of many harmonic oscillators which collectively have the mass. It is for the same reason that particle physicists are mistaken when they say the Higgs boson gives everything else mass, it doesn't. There is no explanation that I can find which explains what exactly this mechanism is or how it works, it seems there is no mechanism it is just guesswork and trying to make the logic appear to make sense. Of course it doesn't, there is no mechanism it is fiction, making a far fetched idea appear scientific. Spring time theory does, the vortexes twisting as they move through the fabric pull the fabric together, the longer any vortex or collection qof vortexes is or are held in a specific region the greater the vacuum energy can hold and compact them together.
h is the circumference of the quantum node when excited into the first maximum state of oscillation, the distance a wave has to travel to get from one side to the other (the faster the nodes are twisting shows up as a shorter wavelength and ℏ is the distance from the node's surface at rest to its maximum energy limit in the single node quantum state.
It is measured along one macro dimension but which orientation or twist the harmonic oscillators h are in (QM:spin) when detection is performed at the quantum level is dependent on when the conscious beings initiated the measurement (explaining quantum entanglement QE). Once initiated this orientation is observed to be maintained as long as the measurement is because it corresponds to the waves movement along one dimension. In QE any two or more parts of the wave no matter how far apart will be detected by 2 or more synchronised conscious beings in an orientation of oscillation that has an inverse relationship to the other in both space and timing that is relational to the source of entanglement and each other.
This changes everything we thought we knew in physics and calls for everything to be thought out again and rewritten. Every single fact we thought was indisputable must be challenged and looked at afresh.
( Everyone is asked to save an offline copy in case of any server problems with the website. Videos of some of the main principles and predictions are available in short videos on youtube with subtitles on channel Sean g 137, also on metacafe as Sean g 137 and yandex as Oldanddilis.
Backups are saved on other online servers in Russia and down under Video backups are on the links page.
FULL CC terms are explained below the brief CC terms for online use or media broadcasts are that this webpage address https://doubleslitsolution.weebly.com/springtimetheory.html and youtube channel "Sean g 137" are made clear at the start of any production and at the top of any written credits. Everyone is also asked to contribute where errors are spotted, to be constructive not obstructive.)
[106]. Akira Tonomura at Hitachi noted his surprise that every "particle" fired was detected at the detection area. If we reduce this detection area classical logic devoid of conscious interaction would have a reduced number of "tparticles" detected. If we reduce it by 1/4, 1/3, 1/2, 2/3, etc classical logic without a conscious field indicates that the amount of "tparticles" detected should reduce in proportion, this is not what I believe will happen. What will happen is that the amount of tparticles detected will remain the same proving the field is aware of our conscious focus and adjusting the experiment focus accordingly.
ENERGY QUANTISED IS
A PUSH
Here is a simple equation that shows Relativity is misunderstood and which proves energy is created as a product of time. Mathematical evidence that the big bang is incorrect.
E=VPT/t
Energy is the total amount of pushes within a system dictated by pressure P per volume V over a period of universal time T, we use a fixed volume, constant or average pressure and divide it into discrete units of mechanical/clock time t to measure and define it.
Remember T and t are distinct, T is Universal or conscious time and t is mechanical or clock time.
Which proves that because conscious time T always increases then at the event horizon of a dark star (traditionally known as a black hole) where t is 0 in the same Volume and Pressure matter is still created, dark stars still grow, ENERGY is created as a product of time. Because energy is created and matter is energy then matter is also created. Not in an instant big bang which violates every known law of physics but all the time in black bodies and white holes "stars/suns" of which most are one and the same thing in different states of luminosity (which from the outside appear as alternating between both states, darkness and brightness over long periods of time). The logical beginning coming from a flexible fabric sphere which is consistent with Grigori Perelman's team's proof to the Poincare Conjecture. Which I call the initial pulse and the Universe has continued growing ever since. The basic explanation for the equation and quantised energy is explained in this video so simple a child should understand https://youtu.be/p_UegZStJ78
Regarding the measurement problem To understand why energy moves in all directions but we only detect it on one dimension consider the moon reflected on water. The light from the moon reflects off the water in every possible place that we see but we can only identify, see and measure it along the line or dimension that is nearest in time and space between us and it. This is the essence of the optical illusion at the quantum level, we can only detect the energy as it moves along the closest dimension (line of field nodes) to us. Other events happening within any range of "live" measurement are in a sense blocked out by the foremost activity, similar in a sense to how dim movement on a moonlit night is difficult to make out while one has a cars headlights facing into ones eyes. Antimatter is the activity happening on objects facing away from us, usually very difficult to detect behind the activity happening in the foreground but always there.
Physicists say time is only one dimensional but this is not true, only in the conscious realm does time move forward in one dimension. The very essence of Einsteins Special Relativity is that the measurement of time is multidimensional in the physical Universe. When one understands this the solution to the double slit experiment is clear. In order to measure time we must use 3 dimensions. In a traditional clock the cogs rotate around one dimension the z axis in increments that are measured at positions plotted on the x and y axes. A pendulum is hinged to turn on the z axis and the weight swings through positions on the x and y axes. In atomic clocks the fluctuations in energy levels are between 3 dimensional areas. Time always moves forward but so does energy and matter, they only appear to move sideways or backwards relative to other objects, the reality is time is the same, it is just a matter of perspective, again it is a matter of Relativity.
The most sobering and serious finding from the solution to the double slit experiment and this simple equation which both prove that energy is created is that Einsteins Relativity is further validated/confirmed. The current model of star formation and lifecycle has many anomalies like the surface problem of how gases can form without external pressure, how gas and heat can be radiated without a lattice, the neutral H problem for some examples (which my field mechanics explain) which are routinely ignored, perhaps as small inconveniences but the reality is they are huge problems and the reality shows that our sun is acting like a white hole which many say Einstein's GR predicted exist. It does not burn through a finite amount of fuel. It generates it's own energy and matter, constantly growing by consuming or drawing in more spacetime fabric and displacing fluid/flazzma/ether/dark matter. The most recent findings of some space weather channels I[106a] show that it goes nova or micro nova periodically usually causing mass extinctions. The last one seems to be what wiped out the woolly mammoths, (the demise of Neanderthals too perhaps due in some part to a previous Nova) the sun then decreased in energy immediately after the nova expulsion and this is what led to the ice age. Copious amount of evidence shows that the build up to the next nova event has begun. If we are not prepared and get caught by surprise anyone facing the sun may be hit like a bomb and an electron storm as massive amounts of light is converted into torlectrons and consequently many other tparticles, the ensuing wave of matter from the sun which will begin arriving about 18 hours after the initial flash will continue for hours or even days, it will almost certainly wipe out all satellites, many power grids, phones and other electrical networks. Potentially leaving a doomsday zombie apocalypse type scenario with crops destroyed and supply chains put out of operation and most of the planet in sub zero temperatures 24/7 for a time that has yet to be estimated. People really have to start taking this really seriously....please.
There is a powerful lobby of science deniers in the big bang, SMOPP industry, who seem to prefer what is popular to what the most recent evidence shows. Who debate about whether the evidence from these minority resources is definitely accurate but the geology of radioactive elements in specific layers of rock in the Earth, stars going nova repeatedly (like RsOph which has gone nova 8 times since 1888 [105]) is indicating the current model of 'supernova as a one time death of a star' is incorrect and the fact it is consistent with springtime theory suggests the debate is from science deniers who misunderstand physics and/or have an agenda to protect their hegemony as guardians of what science reaches the public, protecting their own business and political interests (perhaps through foolishness rather than malice, either way it poses immense danger to humanity and life on Earth.)
There is speculation that Rs0ph is taking the matter from a nearby red dwarf but it remains speculation. Such speculation is needed to provide the demand for answers which keep the current inconclusive theory of star formation with it's many anomalies and problems credible. When we look at the logic that I provide against Pulsars being lighthouses and the logic suggesting they are more akin to strobe lights, it seems more likely that Rs0ph is still early in its evolution as it speeds up to eventually become a pulsar.
We are ridiculously unprepared for even a major solar storm like the Carrington event in 1859 yet we are now much more heavily populated and dependent on technology for everything. If we get hit by surprise the consequences don't bear thinking about nor need explaining to most educated people. The old saying "Hope for the best prepare for the worst." seems wise.
The understanding and manipulation of time is key to understanding the correct model of physics. The biggest misunderstanding preventing physicists from unifying Relativity with Quantum mechanics is that the MEASUREMENT of time slows down near massive objects NOT time itself. Hence why quantum entanglement works regardless of location/time zone
EXPLANATION OF THE IMAGE ABOVE.
Equation and image Copyright. 1 April 2021 Sean Giollaighan (copyright with CC open access to ensure it is kept free for everyone.) NOTE: The above image is a rough visualisation of the parameters, it is not following rigid mathematical standards. My aim here is to illustrate the logic not demonstrate exact mathematical measurement, that is done elsewhere.
I use the symbol Ψ psi for a wave not an abstract "wave function" because that is exactly what it is being registered on the screen, a wave propagating out in all directions through the field. The measurement problem is that we can only measure a wave (or anything) along one dimension of space at a time (one discrete period of time) common sense however tells us it must be a wave.
If the particle gun PG is situated 4 units of space that I will call a quantum meter (QM) from the front screen and 8 QM from the back screen and a wave travels through one QM in one quantum increment of time which I will call a quantum tick QT. Then if the distance from the centre point on the front screen C1 is 4 QM and the centre point on the back screen C2 is 8 QM from the particle gun it will take a pulse of energy 4 QT to hit C1. If the range of focus is set to all the area on the back screen between H and I then the unit of distance from C2 to H or I is 4.12 QM and the distance from C1 to F or G is 2.06 QM. So any waves sent from PG will arrive at any possible location of wave crests hitting matter between 4 QTs after the energy pulse has been sent and 9 QTs after the pulse of energy has been sent which is labelled as time range t1 in the diagram. We must bear in mind that while the overall wave crest nearest in space to PG always hits C1, we know that any wave is the sum total of all the smallest possible waves that propagate out at every point passed in the waves path in the quantum field and this can be quantised to a quantum wave, the smallest wave possible. So it is not necessarily the first wave crest that is detected nearest in space to the PG it is any possible location where any 2 quantum waves merge. This can be at any location passed between 4QT to 4.5QTs and 8.25QTs to 9QTs after the energy has been sent. So we expect some of those will be detected between 4QTs and 4.5QTs time and F and G space while the rest will be detected between 8.25QTs (which is the shortest possible path between the PG and the back screen which is the area between PG and D or E) and about 9QTs time which is the time it takes the wave to travel from the PG to H or I in space.
Once we detect for which way we reduce the time range down to only the possible quantum wave mergers happening between 4.125 QTs and 4.25 QTs in time which is labelled time range t2 in the diagram, these happening 0.5 QM and 1QM from C1 however not detected at A or B because there is not matter there to register a mark. Then the only possible range of quantum waves detected in matter must occur in just exactly twice the possible distance between the PG and D or E which is between 8.25QTs and 8.5QTs in time from the PG and the back screen.
If the detection is set for between 4.125QTs and 4.25QTs at A then if a wave merger does not happen in phase at A between this time range a conscious operator knows that the wave merger must have occurred in phase at B and still has 4 QTs to adjust the focus from D to E and detect a merger at E between 8.25QTs and 8.5QTs.
The only logical explanation from the inequality is that the field must be alive and SUPER INTELLIGENT beyond anything we have ever thought possible before and responds to every thought or intention we put energy into. It is not really far fetched at all if we consider the difference in intelligence of a human in comparison to a human cell. The human is almost infinitely more intelligent, aware and powerful than one single cell yet the mind coordinates billions or trillions of processes within the body within every second, when we view activity inside animal cells it looks like microscopic workers busy carrying out various jobs for example using DNA to synthesize proteins. So it is perfectly logical that the Universe is infinitely more intelligent than us, we are to IT what workers in cells are to us and IT coordinates an almost infinitely greater number of processes within all of the spacetime fabric. This understanding led to the following Unified Field Theory "Spring Time Theory" that is consistent with the violation of the standard model of particle physics at CERN in March 2021 and with the MUON decay at Fermilab both of which pointed to something being wrong with the SMOPP and pointed to even more problems with a suspected 5th force. Fortunately Spring Time Theory takes the data and reduces all 4 forces down to one field, one force which works to unify Quantum Mechanics, General Relativity and Special Relativity.
A short video demonstrating the inequality visually complete with sign language and translateable captions is in this video on youtube https://youtu.be/YubeIGJRkgg
It seems to me that physicists falsely assumed that all waves must be passing through with the original experiment setup giving the interference pattern. This is what I realised must be incorrect soon after I learned about the experiment, I sensed the timing of the which way experiment was incompatible with a travelling particle. I visualized a field packed tight in every direction with what I would compare to invisible but solid snooker or pool balls. These were then being hit by an object and the energy travelling out through all directions a bit like the Newtons Cradle executive toy might if it were 3 dimensional. I wrote my explanation around May 2019 but I could get no positive response from working physicists who insisted it was definitely NOT a wave and so were unwilling to entertain the idea or it seems were unwilling to consider my logic. So I began working on putting what I visualized into a full Unified Field Theory which it turned out easily solved every problem I came up against in a relatively short time beginning with the logic that solved the vacuum catastrophe. The inequality was later verified by finding the indisputable evidence in the video by Nebraska Lincoln University but to date 12/April/2021 I have been unable to find a qualified and competent physicist willing to consider what I state my Field Theory does, it proves both the SMOPP and the Big Bang are incorrect interpretations of the data (the fact is that both models' interpratation of the mathematics are inconsistent with observation, the big bang violates all known models of physics QM/GR/SR/Thermodynamics, cause and effect etc. and needs various fudges and far fetched science fiction to hold it together.)
If time were one dimensional then detecting for which way should have us see less wave crests make it through to the back screen, not all of them because most crests would hit the front screen outside where the slits are, in fact logic would suggest they would all hit the area between the slits on the front screen like a laser pointed directly forward would always light up wherever it is pointed to. When run for the interference pattern the range is set from the particle gun to all space on the back screen and as the front screen is in the way of some possible straight trajectories then most of the possible location of hits within that range are on the front screen, the others on the back screen are defined by the intersection of two new trajectories as a result of the wave being split into two at the slits.
If time were one dimensional and we dont try to detect for which way we should see one specific range being hit on the back screen, either the central band or two specific bands, one each side of the centre of the back screen (logic would suggest twin bands which are closest in space to the particle gun). However the fact that some waves registered as hits arrive in space further or closer to the particle gun giving a visible interference pattern while the speed of light and electrons are constant in a vacuum and in an area that could not be affected to such a wide degree of variation by any possible minuscule time dilation then time MUST be multi dimensional. Time MUST be propagating in multiple dimensions (relativistic measured time as distinct from time the entity which is constant and universal) even if it can only be detected and measured in one, that is the measurement problem, we can only ever measure in one dimension of space and time in any discrete act of measurement, we can correlate different measurements together but each discrete act of measurement is always in one dimension. So either way whatever possible results we will get on the front screen cannot be consistent with a single particle travelling through empty space in one dimensional time so the interpretation of data known as the standard model of particle physics MUST be wrong and the evidence is already clear, simple and undeniable in these two peer reviewed experiments.
I am not dismissing the standard model completely, it clearly is excellent at making predictions and the data is astounding I am saying the interpretation of the data needs to be looked in a different framework, which I provide. The mathematics in the standard model are brilliant but the essential core concept is incorrect.
When we send different particles what we are sending is in fact different vortices of energy detected as they are caught in different manifold loops within the field nodes and connecting pipes in the lattice, as one will see later in the paper all field nodes in the spacetime/dark matter lattice are identical and act like spherical cogs in a massive system, so the shape of the manifold that the initial energy pulse is emitted in is propagated in waves throughout the field/system.
They are not particles with a wave function, they are waves/vortices moving through the nodes in the field, a bit like waves on the ocean aren't really things and clouds aren't really things. In classical terms water is made of things, air is made of things but the waves in water and clouds are essentially energy moving through the air and water creating shapes and interactions between things. Different mechanics work in the macro and quantum levels but macro level waves are similar in principle to standard model particles which are waves of energy moving through the fluid that runs through the in-situ nodes and the fibre that holds them together in the spacetime fabric. These create shapes, interactions and collisions as light flowing and spinning in vortices twists the fabric into various different forms and phenomenon.
Although the evidence for this inequality was located and revealed by me between November 2019 and Jan 2020 I only articulated it as an "Inequality" on 6th October 2020.
One or other or both MUST be adjusted/give way proving that the mark's left on the back screen ARE the crest of waves. Even if the result on the front screen did maintain consistency with a particle hitting the front screen then the concept of a particle as a single particle that travels through space must be wrong because that would mean that the "particle" would have to be hitting both screens (front with slits and the back screen with the twin band or interference pattern) at the same time so it is no longer a single particle, a singularity cannot exist in two places at one time, The field that I visualised to solve the double slit experiment shows conclusively that The big bang is wrong (I initially thought there may be a spark but not as articulated in the big bang that explains the CMB but I have since come to the current belief that the CMB is vibrational resonance in the field). The big bang and standard model of particle physics are both based on excellent data but the maths and evidence have been completely misinterpreted. I give the correct model in this paper. I explain in detail why there must be consciousness in the field also in the page on the solution to the double slit experiment, consciousness in the field communicating or responding with the human operators is the only possible way that the parameters in the experiment can be varied and we get different patterns on the back screen, I explain why and it is simple common sense.
The other thing it shows is that it is not the physical detection that collapses any theoretical wave function or causes decoherence it is the setup of the experiment. A fact that helps explain the quantum eraser, delayed choice experiments. The possible hits and patterns are already limited by the range of focus that we setup in the experiments.
As I explain In the main body of the paper on the double slit experiment the dynamics and logic in the experiment parameters dictate that consciousness must be what is setting the focus and part of that consciousness MUST be within the field/spacetime/dark matter lattice itself.
Time and matter have an inverse relationship:when a "particle"(energy) acts in time like a wave it leaves a mark in matter like a particle when it acts in time like a particle it leaves a mark in matter like a wave.
I also provide a new simple way to run the experiment using a wire filament thread detector as used by Akira Tonomuta, explained on the page about the double slit experiment which I predict will detect time dimensions to change which direction light or matter fired forward will go (while the thread is placed far away from the expected path of the light or matter) and can be positioned to vary the width of the interference pattern..
The understanding and manipulation of time is key. The biggest misunderstanding preventing physicists from unifying Relativity with Quantum mechanics is that the MEASUREMENT of time slows down near massive objects NOT time itself. Hence why quantum entanglement works regardless of location/time zone
....
ENTROPY AND WHY IT SHOWS THE JEANS MODEL OF STAR FORMATION IS WRONG
In order to explain entropy I realised exactly why the Jeans model of star formation is wrong while watching a video By Alessandro Roussei and Octavo Massonon the channel scienceclic english so I will explain entropy and why understanding it leads to understanding why the Jeans model is wrong, in a nutshell gravity is not a force it is the geometrical shape of the spacetime web. Gases to not form gravity they need a source of gravity to stabilise. This leads to explaining what I was struggling to figure out, thanks for the video. I'll explain step by step what it leads to to follow along with the visuals on the channel the video is at https://youtu.be/NfTmy1ApCvI
Min:1 the blanck picture resembles 2 in shape but 2 resembles 1 in colour,/intensity. So entropy equates to lack of shape or form. Not homogenious as such, there is as much homogeneity in a crystal than a gas cloud but it is more organised, it has more form/shape. If you rendomly create an arrangement it is more likely to look homogenious on large scales than a crystal but in the crystal with the same overall mass there is every bit as much movement. The movement in the crystal is structured so the matter inside is not colliding and generating thermal energy, the matter in the gas cloud is. The matter in the crystal is moving every bit as fast and the overall distribution in space AND time is equal but in more confined and in structured paths.
3:19 this is wrong, soz, when you look at the gas and the ice cube there are equally as many configurations, the structure changes from each movement of energy through each harmonic oscillator at each unit of Planck time. So the overall number of possible configurations is equal in both but the distribution of those comfigurations is all that differs. The number of configurations/arrangements are the same, the locations of the configurations differ.
3:42 you are correct in what you say but are misunderstanding the mechanics, you say in the ice cube the molecules have less freedom but the problem is what you percieve as molecules are not objects they are the shapes vortexes create and the vortexes which are the only THINGS in the system have exacrly the same freedom as those in the gas they can only move forward in fact one can say those in the gas have less freedom because they collide more often. So they cannot move forward as freely they collide much much more so their agitation is phenomenally greater than those in the ice cube hence why they get so heated, collisions of matter creates more agitation more detectable heat. All energy is kinetic energy, potential energy is movement in structured paths. Every bit as much forward movement and therefore the same amount of collisions of quantum harmonic oscillators but more collisions of matter so more detected thermal energy/heat. Split the molecules/atoms and the potential heat released has phenomenally hot energy. Overall the same energy in both when both have an overall equal mass.
4:29 when you add heat to the water you alter the paths making the paths less structured leading to more collisions and the transition to gas.
5:17 again this is relative to your focus the second has more random characters but may have zero information in lexical terms, no meaningful information portrayed in the language while the repeated words have meaning, they have meaningful information. In the computer the amount of binary information is the same, this differs from matter because while you can compress strings of code into smaller units you can compress matter into macro space smaller than the original in the electron which is the vortex passing through in one unit of time. However you still pass through the same number of quantum oscillators that space is limited just like the space in the computer menory is limited.
6:22 the holographic principle is wrong because the 2D surface does not contain any information about movement and neither matter nor electromagnetic radiation nor neutrino radiation exist without movement. The amount of bits inside a dark star(they are not black holes) is greater than those at the surface, our intuition is correct, those formulating the holographic principle missed the essential element of movement.
8:30 this is not clear on the mechanics, you say it is precisely for this reason that the process happens in this direction rather than the other, that is stating the obvious without actually stating precisely why, the reason the distribution in space appears more and the form less structured is because the paths are disrupted yet the distribution of energy in time AND space is equal for both states. This is why the Jeans model of star formation is wrong, the entropy in a gas is high, it cannot create paths to allow gravity to form because gravity is a geometric structure not a force. I had previously thought that although unlikely perhaps it may be bosons causing the formation but this can't be because bosons in superfluids do not have their own gravity they are only pulled towards large gravitational objects they do not have viscosity and do not clump or form clouds.
Another reminder that the model of cosmology and star evolution is incorrect, another reason for everyone to look seriously at the model that does work because the evidence shows our sun has Nova events and recent evidence shows stars are erupting in a line from the centre of our galaxy coming towards us as i type, our sun is going to have a massive solar event and physicists should be working on figuring out how powerful the blast is likely to be and how we can prepare. It is potentially going to kill billions of people in the blast and leave any survivors in an ice age with virually all digital infrastructure highly compromised if not totally destroyed.
.
SPRING TIME THEORY, THE UNIFIED FIELD THEORY THAT EXPLAINS EVERYTHING
AKA
THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING
CONTENTS
*PREAMBLE
* PICTURE OF THE STRUCTURE OF THE HARMONIC OSCILLATOR AND BASIC BUILDING BLOCK AT EVERY INTERSECTION IN THE SPACETIME FABRIC
*© CC COPYRIGHT TERMS & INTRODUCTORY NOTES
*SUMMARY OF THE CENTRAL PROBLEM OF QUANTUM PHYSICS: THE MEASUREMENT PROBLEM, The Planck NUMBERS AND THE SOLUTION TO BELL'S THEOREM
*SUMMARY OF THE MATHEMATICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL MODELS
*FOREWORD
*EXPANDED ABSTRACT
*INTRODUCTION
*THE ORIGIN OF THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE
*THE MATHEMATICAL MODEL WITH THE EXPLANATION OF THE TRUE MAGNETIC MONOPOLES
*THE PHILOSOPHICAL/METAPHYSICAL MODEL.
*OVERVIEW OF THE STANDARD MODEL OF PARTICLE PHYSICS
*NUCLEAR ENERGY/REACTION
*WHY TIME IS MULTI DIMENSIONAL
*THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF LIFE
*FUN/GROSS SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENT FOR ALL AGES
*THE QUANTUM FIELD: VIBRATION/ENERGY PASSES THROUGH THE QUANTUM FIELD
*GRAVITY
*FUN GRAVITY EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
*ORBITALS OF ELECTRONS
*OCEAN TIDES AND THE MOON
*M=(4/3.πc³-El Mev/c²).ne.nx.p.3Δt(nx for the number of field positions, ne for the number of vortices (torlectrons), El for energy lost/undetected) (EXPLAINING MASS OF HIGGS BOSON, FERMIONS and W & Z Bosons) © CC terms
Including the explanation for the muon g-2 and beauty quark decay anomalies.
*NEW PHYSICS, NEW PROBLEMS GIVEN THE CORRECT PHYSICS
*ELECTROMAGNETISM
*FUN ELECTROMAGNETISM EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
*CHARGE
*FUN CHARGE EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
*PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT
*PHOTOSYNTHESIS
*PLANTS CAN ALSO.....XXXXX?
*CHI/QI/KUNDALINI, ETHERIC ENERGY
*SURFACE TENSION OF LIQUIDS AND SONOLUMINESCENCE
*HEAT AND COLD
*SUPERFLUIDITY AND LATERAL GRAVITY
*FUN SUPERFLUIDITY/LATERAL GRAVITY EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
*THE SPEED OF LIGHT
*FUN SPEED OF LIGHT EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
*QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND TELEPORTATION
*FUN QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND TELEPORTATION EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
*GRAVITATIONAL WAVES
* HIGH AND ULTRA HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS
*LEFT HANDED BIAS
*ANTIMATTER
*CHARGE PARITY VIOLATION?
* FIXING THE VACUUM CATASTROPHE: intensity ∝ 1/distance²-E/G
* Equation that summarise Time and Energy
* THE FINE STRUCTURE CONSTANT 137.035999084
*DARK ENERGY
*COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND AND THE FLATNESS OF THE UNIVERSE
* WHITE HOLES
* WORMHOLES
* ODD RADIO CIRCLES
*OCCAM'S RAZOR
*END NOTE ON THE PROFOUND IMPLICATIONS FOR METAPHYSICS AND HUMANITY
*REFERENCES
AKA
THE THEORY OF EVERYTHING
CONTENTS
*PREAMBLE
* PICTURE OF THE STRUCTURE OF THE HARMONIC OSCILLATOR AND BASIC BUILDING BLOCK AT EVERY INTERSECTION IN THE SPACETIME FABRIC
*© CC COPYRIGHT TERMS & INTRODUCTORY NOTES
*SUMMARY OF THE CENTRAL PROBLEM OF QUANTUM PHYSICS: THE MEASUREMENT PROBLEM, The Planck NUMBERS AND THE SOLUTION TO BELL'S THEOREM
*SUMMARY OF THE MATHEMATICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL MODELS
*FOREWORD
*EXPANDED ABSTRACT
*INTRODUCTION
*THE ORIGIN OF THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE
*THE MATHEMATICAL MODEL WITH THE EXPLANATION OF THE TRUE MAGNETIC MONOPOLES
*THE PHILOSOPHICAL/METAPHYSICAL MODEL.
*OVERVIEW OF THE STANDARD MODEL OF PARTICLE PHYSICS
*NUCLEAR ENERGY/REACTION
*WHY TIME IS MULTI DIMENSIONAL
*THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF LIFE
*FUN/GROSS SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENT FOR ALL AGES
*THE QUANTUM FIELD: VIBRATION/ENERGY PASSES THROUGH THE QUANTUM FIELD
*GRAVITY
*FUN GRAVITY EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
*ORBITALS OF ELECTRONS
*OCEAN TIDES AND THE MOON
*M=(4/3.πc³-El Mev/c²).ne.nx.p.3Δt(nx for the number of field positions, ne for the number of vortices (torlectrons), El for energy lost/undetected) (EXPLAINING MASS OF HIGGS BOSON, FERMIONS and W & Z Bosons) © CC terms
Including the explanation for the muon g-2 and beauty quark decay anomalies.
*NEW PHYSICS, NEW PROBLEMS GIVEN THE CORRECT PHYSICS
*ELECTROMAGNETISM
*FUN ELECTROMAGNETISM EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
*CHARGE
*FUN CHARGE EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
*PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT
*PHOTOSYNTHESIS
*PLANTS CAN ALSO.....XXXXX?
*CHI/QI/KUNDALINI, ETHERIC ENERGY
*SURFACE TENSION OF LIQUIDS AND SONOLUMINESCENCE
*HEAT AND COLD
*SUPERFLUIDITY AND LATERAL GRAVITY
*FUN SUPERFLUIDITY/LATERAL GRAVITY EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
*THE SPEED OF LIGHT
*FUN SPEED OF LIGHT EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
*QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND TELEPORTATION
*FUN QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND TELEPORTATION EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
*GRAVITATIONAL WAVES
* HIGH AND ULTRA HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS
*LEFT HANDED BIAS
*ANTIMATTER
*CHARGE PARITY VIOLATION?
* FIXING THE VACUUM CATASTROPHE: intensity ∝ 1/distance²-E/G
* Equation that summarise Time and Energy
* THE FINE STRUCTURE CONSTANT 137.035999084
*DARK ENERGY
*COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND AND THE FLATNESS OF THE UNIVERSE
* WHITE HOLES
* WORMHOLES
* ODD RADIO CIRCLES
*OCCAM'S RAZOR
*END NOTE ON THE PROFOUND IMPLICATIONS FOR METAPHYSICS AND HUMANITY
*REFERENCES
The tree, grass, insects, fungi, bacteria in the picture like humans and all other Earthlings share a common ancestor, we are in essence all one family in different biological machines, we are all conscious and sentient (aware of and feel/sense our own and others existence) in varying degrees.
.
Above 2 conscious beings touching, loving and experiencing each other and the Universe/spacetime fabric which is omnipresent/everywhere thanks to light spinning at trillions of times a second twisting the strands of the lattice into matter and light bouncing off that collection of twists so we can see them. Also to collide with them or in other words, touch them and each other.
.
.
|
PREAMBLE
The following few paragraphs and videos are aimed at giving simplified illustrations of the main principles of the mechanics of the Universe before going deeper into the detail.
The above picture [61] illustrates why we detect tparticles as single units when in fact they are always part of a wave but other parts of the wave go undetected in 13 dimensional spacetime. The flower will move with a million others in a field if a wave of fresh air blows. However while the camera is focused on this single flower it will not catch what is happening beyond it. Here is an example to understand it in terms of time...
Hugh Everett was correct, physicists constantly over complicate interpretations, reality is MUCH more simple and intuitive The wave function of QM IS all of reality, it is every wave moving out in every direction. The wave function doesn't collapse, the range of measurement or DETECTION gets reduced to one dimension of spacetime, just as it does in the double slit experiments. The probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics is not relating to the existence of other parts of the wave it is relating to the DETECTION which can only be done on one dimension of spacetime. The probability is the likelihood of which dimension or line of sight the wave will be detected on. However many worlds is not quite correct, only one Universe exists but detection is possible in multiple different dimensions the total amount of possible dimensions that detection can be made on is 13^t/2, divided by 2 because we can only detect possible dimensions in the forward moving trajectory of time. Those moving backwards in spacetime relative to us can not be detected only deduced. Even if we detect an interference pattern on a screen placed in space behind the particle gun in the double slit experiments which is theoretically possible (I say certain, some way or another sooner or later it will be done), these are still from the wave that moves forward in time.
Some short videos which perhaps give a quick and easy grasp of some of the essential elements of the theory are available in the following links. These are only a few minutes long but I think have enough essential information to allow sceptics realise their time will not be wasted reading my Theory of Everything (because this is THE Theory of Everything) and the paper on the double slit experiment.
Time dilation is space/dark matter dilation 3 min
https://youtu.be/YubeIGJRkgg
The 13 dimensions of space/dark matter 5min
https://youtu.be/LcaXZ-1sCPQ
The meaning of Alpha 137.035999 is on the Sean g 137 channel in 4 parts beginning with the logic and how spectral lines appear ending with the math.
The explanation of vacuum energy in real terms which ends the vacuum catastrophe and the mystery of dark energy https://youtu.be/i9gf-dH4SAg
And https://yadi.sk/i/jv76zdb7Pjad3g
Standard model particle shapes deduced using my formula which was posted months before the moun violation (check the dates), where I explain the shape of the muon that explains the larger than expected dipole moment/wobble in effect predicting the structure that explains the violation.
https://youtu.be/hQUWXSdc6IE
And https://yadi.sk/i/MGWcIBCW5gotaw
How matter is formed by light becoming stuck in vortices in the spacetime fabric and the critical biting point between light and matter using the fine structure constant 137
https://youtu.be/zlZ1JebtRD8
And https://yadi.sk/i/qnDcnfGn7ghVaA
Quantum gravity, how gravity works at the quantum level and at the surface of large gravitational bodies ://youtu.be/vJm3VgAh7W4
And https://yadi.sk/i/l7ZeuFfJkrcr5A
The flower represents each point or field node which exists at every intersection in the spacetime field. What we percieve as particles are in fact detections of waves passing through them, our mechanical "real time" detection is limited to one location in 13 dimensional time (and space...but don't panic or think 13 dimensions of space and time must be impossibly complex it is actually very simple as the reader will see in the image below, we can still visualise and do most practical calculations using 3 dimensions of space and one of time. In order to understand how simple it is be aware that a dimension is essentially simply an axis or a line on which points can be plotted or around which space/positions/x can rotate. Some people seem to confuse a realm with a dimension. A realm is a different level of experience or existence within the Universe's realm of possibilities, like the quantum realm and the macro realm, the realms of life and death, the biological realms of conscious awareness and non conscious purely physical experience. To keep it simple for now just view a dimension as an axis/line.) so like the other flowers existing in other dimensions of space and relative time in the photo, other parts of the wave are obscured. This creates the optical and physical illusion that they are moving particles, Similar to how there may appear to be an object passing along the dominoes in this video, when in fact the objects stay in the one position and move when the energy passes (the action begins at 0:27 seconds in) https://youtu.be/vDy2xWpZWVc .
The solution to the double slit experiment and making common sense out of quantum mechanics is this. The wave "function" in quantum mechanics represents the fact that what is detected as a tparticle is always one part of a wave of energy as it passes through a field node/intersection. Although this wave propagates and spreads out as a spherical wave in all directions, measurement is always limited to detection of the wave along one dimension of space and one dimension of time which always corresponds to the wave moving along one line of field nodes appearing like a single particle. We traditionally view space as being 3 dimensional, most celestial objects rotate on one axis but in the quantum realm there are 13 interchangeable dimensions. 3 dominant and 10 minor dimensions within the electromagnetic spectrum. Once a vortex is created in the internal fluid it twists the fabric out of shape so light can no longer pass through. This twist is detected as mass and the effect of this twist means we can detect the lattice/dark matter by collision "touch" or by seeing light bounce back off where it can no longer pass straight through, this is known as matter. It is formed as the field nodes rotate back and forth on these 13 dimensions which alternate with various different combinations of dominant and minor influence as the nodes clump, twist, rebound and release as energy passes from one field node to another, caught in manifold loops which are closed relative to themselves but open just enough to pass along in the field through trillions of nodes a second (to visualise that imagine a mini whirlpool being carried down a stream.)
My favourite way to help people grasp the basic concept of the spacetime fabric is to compare it with fishnet stockings If we put a pen or a jagged object into fishnet stockings and twist it, the fabric gathers around the pen just like mass gathers in clumps due to the vacuum effect created in the ether within the fabric. At the same time the fabric surrounding the clump is stretched, that is, it expands but inwards not outwards. It is an inwards expansion in the Universe, the detail of how this leads to gravity, the optical illusion of an outwards expanding universe and redshift are all explained in detail in the paper and summarised in this short video https://youtu.be/1RItYd2sWXw
The spacetime fabric/dark matter lattice generally referred to as "The Universe"or cosmic web is a transparent physical lattice existing in a void, the particle in quantum mechanics is the field node which sits at every intersection in the lattice, the wave function is the wave of light(energy/electromagnetism) passing moving it making it oscillate. All matter including our bodies are vortexes of light stuck in loops within the field particles, being relayed along, appearing to us like actual particles moving collectively through the space time fabric at up to many thousands of kilometres a second.
So the Earth like all massive objects is a wave of energy moving through spacetime, a mind bogglingly complex wave or collection of vortices. Even the amount of vortices intertwined in one piece of fruit or a human cell amounts to trillions and is mind bogglingly complex, however the extreme prcision and unvarying properties of the spacetime fabric mean the mechanics enable spectacular synchronicity which makes up everything we know as matter. Just like a surfer needs a wave to surf if there were no wave there would be no surfing s/he would be stranded in the water, paddling at best. So too we as souls need waves on which to ride.
The reason why everything in the field passes through in such perfect synchronicity, keeping consistency, keeping the trillions of different shapes, forms and properties of matter is due to the uniformity of the torlectron. Because the field nodes are identical at every position in the field the vortexes which form within them are also identical. They can neither grow beyond the limit imposed by the Planck parameters nor can they reduce in size unless through annihilation in which case they no longer exist. This absolute uniformity creates the condition for perfect synchronicity and consistency in matter throughout the fabric of the Universe. So everything moves in perfect timing keeping perfect shape unable to deviate from form, unable to allow matter to digress into chaos and/or imbalance. It is an extremely difficult concept for the human mind to grasp that we are not made out of solid material but are conscious beings using conscious energy to hold collections of waves and vortices together. Like the evidence the Greeks provided that the world is round while it makes sense on paper, even so our human conditioning finds the reality extremely difficult to accept. Even for me, it is extremely difficult to get my head around the fact a butterfly's wing with its soft powdered colours, a human hair, a wooden table, an electric wire, a bird or plane flying at 50 or 500 kilometres an hour can be made out of these vortices passing through folding and unfolding the nodes in the fabric of the Universe in and out of shape trillions of times and thousands of kilometres a second. While the countless different biological processes simultaneously happen at different speeds within the biological bodies in the one overall suncronicity. But I understand it is so. It really is mind blowing, so much so that some of the planets leading physicists reading it have blown mental fuses and have been unable to pragmatically accept and acknowledge the facts that they subconsciously know, intellectually, are clear and cannot be disputed. This perhaps not just the physics but also due to the metaphysics that are inseparable to the wholeness of the work. With extremely comfortable, revered, repected, wealthy persons (many deservedly, some not so much) promoting wild hypothesis as fact despite the problems, along with the modern popularity of athiesm and some humans percieving themselves as superior it is perhaps shocking, embarassing, unnerving even perhaps frightening that the evidence shows a completely different reality to the ones they have been promoting as fact.
Lambda to my understanding is describing the pressure in the fluid in our region of the Universe which I imagine must be near the edge or surface of a spherical Universe, this creates the balance in growth of mass in any celestial body with a black body at its core* which increases in size over time and therefore in gravity to the inwards stretch of the fabric. As gravity increases the object pulls in more fabric (dark matter/spacetime fabric/cosmic web) this reduces the radius of gravitational spheres which increases the magnification in the gravitational lenses that we look out through to view the Universe, giving the appearance that distant galaxies are moving apart faster than the speed of light. The acceleration is naturally because with more gravity comes more pulling power, the ability to pull in more dark matter. That is the logical solution with no need for assumptions, science fiction nor violations of the speed of light, it explains redshift, more gravity more redshift.
* Any celestial body with a black body or dark star at it's core which is so dense that the energy it creates cannot escape so it propagates and grows within. Such as Sag-A the dark star at the centre of our galaxy, or our own sun which has a much smaller black body perhaps the size of a mountain and most surprisingly but obvious once we think about the separation of continental plates our own planet which has a black body perhaps still only the size of something like a wrecking ball. But which is obviously growing all the time, greating more matter/energy forcing the continents ever farther apart. Energy creation of course proven by the solution to the double slit experiment which reveals that matter is created by propagation but is only measurable in one dimension in any discrete act of measurement.
If one dismisses all that which is logically consistent, verifiable, testable, with no violations of QM or Relativity in favour of what is popular: the outwards expanding universe model then you must go with assumptions, science fiction, theories which are not logical nor testable. Even then when the assumptions and science fiction are introduced the data shows the model is not credible and it is a violation of Occams Law. Data from the Indian astrophysicist teams in 2020 and 2021 [108] showed that the redshift is not just accellerating but that it is in fact speeding up and slowing down in cyclical timing and at different rates in different regions further indicates it is due to passing closer and nearer to gravitational zones.
Einstein always began with common sense, it took him from 1905 until 1915 to come up with the field equations for the common sense. I do the same start with common sense, unfortunately because I dont have a good grounding in complex math it takes me a long time to translate the common sense into maths and the pressure/urgency forces me to make woeful errors along the way which doesnt help. If I had help from someone who can see the logic and has the grounding we might get science back on track faster. As for the Earth thats why t-rex and buddies could grow so large, the Earth was much less massive so they were larger but in relative terms lighter. Our planet is going to keep on growing and eventually melt the crust to become a star, first a brown dwarf, then red dwarf and keep growing. There is no mass gap in the model that makes sense out of everything, everything just keeps growing incrementally.
PROBLEMS WITH THE JEAN'S HYPOTHESIS OF STAR FORMATION AND AN ALTERNATIVE MODEL USING RICCI FLOW
As for Jean's "stars from gas clouds collapsing" theory it makes no sense. It calls for an enclosed sphere which to my knowledge doesnt exist in space it only exists within black bodies. It also assumes that the collective mass of gas particles have influence collectively which is not true, in this sense it treats gravity as a force rather than geometry, the Jeans model works exceptionally well to describe collections of stars, planets, asteroids etc but that is because they already have gravitational bodies, gravity has a finite cut off point as does any coupling, the problem however is that gas clouds do not have any definite gravity so it is a massive mistake to assert that a gas cloud can collapse under its total gravity, it can't because it has none nor can it form any itself unless pressure is applied and in space there is no mechanism to allow that. I have yet to ever read of anyone putting a gas into a sealed vacuum and the gas forming any clumps, the idea of a gas in outer space forming them may be popular but it isn't credible science. Yes every atom has a gravitational pull but gravity is a very weak force. For example if we use the example of the elastic fabric sheet often used to depict gravity where a heavy object is placed in the centre then balls thrown in which move in orbits around the central object, they spin in orbits and eventually fall in and rest beside the central heavy object. So lets replace the object in the centre with a lump of sand that is the same weight as the original central object, spread this sand evenly all over the fabric. Each grain of sand exerts a bit of weight on the fabric but they will not all fall into a central area and form a ball of sand again. It will just sit there indefinitely unless another object is put into the centre and some falls in, even here most of it will not move much, most will remain spread out. To illustrate the repellant nature of charge causing phenomenal movement replace the sand with fleas and we get lots of collisions of fleas but still no formation of any growth of anything resembling a massive object with large gravity. As we know there is collosal amounts of dust and gas even in the solar system like many other regions around stars but it is always moving and as yet there is no evidence for any eclosed sphere in outer space, the closest things resembling anything near such a sphere are regions like the orc cloud around the solar system but logic common sense tells us it is formed as a result of the suns gravity and activity not vice versa because it is not an enclosed region it is itself a gas and dust cloud in constant movement with no centre of mass other than the sun. That model simply does not work. It may have been the best until now but it doesn't add up.
What I propose is that blobs or bubbles of hot dense plasma are formed within the sun and ejected to form planets and stars. The mechanism for such a bubble or blob coming from an inner region of dense hot plasma around the core of a star such as our sun is consistent with the mathematics of Ricci flow "which is often said to be analogous to the diffusion of heat and the heat equation" [112] The theory, supported by the mathematics is that a piece of dense plasma is stretched away from the main region of dense plasma and forms a sphere in it's own right. A sphere which will move outwards towards the outer layers of the sun due to it's circular nature pushing against the geometrical gravity of the sun which has the fabric pointing inwards towards the core. The newly formed sphere having its own smaller black body centre causing gravity would essentially be geometrically opposite to the gravity affecting elements. As the strands of the fabric are stretched and tightened into smaller angles near the suns core the new blob would be squeezed out and ejected similar in a sense to a small ball pinched between a finger and thumb. This is because while in the region of dense plasma the geometrics of gravity point inwards to the suns core but once a new sphere is extruded from the region it's gravitational geometry is pointing towards its own centre ànd if large enough will cause a tiny black body to form at it's core, this sphere unlike electron orbitals is not moving within the fabric strands which are pulled tighter by the stars gravity, it has the strands of the fabric moving within it and having it's own centre of gravity pushes against the gravity of the star, pushing it out from where the strands are tightly squeezed together towards regions where they are further apart. A tiny black body to begin with but which by nature will continue to grow for eternity (unless some other as yet unknown force acts upon it) after being ejected to become a planet then a star and eventually a black body or neutron star pulsar. While 2 supermassive black bodies can merge due to their gravity a newly formed black body formed just outside the black body in a star would have a much smaller gravity. Also the fact that it has an event or no event horizon where no matter or light can enter means it would be bombarded with massive amounts of pressure from the plasma and most of that pressure would be concentrated between the stars black body core and the newly formed black body. Effectively the new black body would be hit by massive amounts of pressure and sent hurtling at phenomenal speed away from the star's core to a region of less pressure. Logically completely away from the star and into inter stellar space to then slow in momentum due to the stars gravity and settle into an orbit around the star.
EXPERIMENT TO RECORD A SPHERICAL WAVE OF ENERGY PROPAGATING AT THE QUANTUM LEVEL
To illustrate why measurement in multi dimensional spacetime is limiting detection imagine we have a camera which is so finely tuned it flashes and lights an object but only records anything arriving back in an exposure corresponding to as near as we can get to one Planck time unit, this set to capture the very very first photons of light arriving back. Any light arriving back any later than the exposure time arrives back too late and misses the exposure "window of opportunity". If the object being filmed is curved (like a wave) then because any light besides the very nearest part of the wave is deflected after the first arriving photon it will arrive back at the camera too late so it is never recorded. One experiment to test for this would be to fire a particle gun and have lasers or electron guns set in the inside wall of a dome dome then fired out towards the central large particle gun. These fired in intervals of the smallest possible units of time one after another. The bigger the central "tparticle" the better, perhaps a bucky ball for example. The photons and electrons fired in rapid succession one after another to make up a movie. We could run this experiment with multiple cameras located on the inner wall of the dome each positioned beside a laser or an electron gun that is pointing in the same direction, all pointing towards the particle gun at the centre. With fine tuning and timing we set the cameras to record simultaneously, so what once appeared as a single tparticle say a bucky ball in one image will, when combined with all the other images, show up in a 3D image as one part of a spherical wave of energy moving through the field of nodes/RIKs causing each to oscillate and reveal the wave spread out.
Dark Matter.
The original movement of stars within distant spiral Galaxies which confirmed that dark matter exists is primarily due to tides within the ether within the fabric. Similar in a sense to objects moving in an ocean. Dark matter [109] gradually became more prominent as a Theory for unidentified matter in the Universe as a result of many different observations by various astronomers mainly throughout the 20th century who all figured out that there must be more susbstance in the Universe than what we know as matter. It's existence became widely known and verified most notably in many academics minds by the work of Vera Rubin, Kent Ford and Ken Freeman in the 1960s. Their work on spiral galaxies discovered that stars and planets in spiral Galaxies appeared to be violating the laws of gravity. This is because they move at such a speed around the central black body that the gravitational force alone should not be able to hold them, using gravity as the only explanation for distinct astral objects being held together in the macro realm does not add up because their speed is up to 5 or 6 times greater than gravity would hold. Such objects should, using current understandings of gravity, be flung far out into the vast empty regions of the Universe, this however does not happen, they are held tighter to the galaxy centre than expected. The fact is that it is the ether that pulls them together similar to how magnetic material is held together as in magnets. While these astral objects are pushed outwards by their own momentum and the momentum of the galactic waves the medium that they move in creates zones of negative pressure. As ether is drawn away by gravitational bodies it leaves negative pressure in its wake so the entire region and all that is in it is pulled back by the negative pressure. Just like a wave in the ocean may fling a shoal of fish into an opening of a rock pool with a surge of water as the wave and the water receede they draw the fish back out into the ocean. If the fish were thrown in so far that they became cut off they could travel further into the pool independent of the wave but to contextualise the analaogy there is no region of these galaxies cut off from each other. They are all in the same connected system so as the negative pressure builds up towards the central black body the outer objects are drawn back by the suction that the negative pressure creates.
Like time, matter cannot go backwards or stand still, it always moves forwards only appearing to slow down or remain stationary relative to other forward moving objects as articulated in Einstein's Special Relativity. The mistake in this instance has been thinking that because time always moves forward it must be one dimensional but matter always moves forward yet is multi dimensional, so is time. (the next part takes perhaps more thinking than I imagined it would when writing it, reading it back I can see why some people find it confusing.)
While most physicists seem to mistakingly think that time slows down nearer large gravitational zones it is the MEASUREMENT of time that indicates it slows down. However it doesn't, synchronised consciousness relates within a single bandwidth of universal time and each macro moment has potentially 13^tn possible timelines, so everything in our detectable reality exists in a single detectable universal time that we collectively focus on, with variations in measurement depending on gravity (I provide formula to calculate the volume of time). What the double slit experiment reveals is much more unexpected, profound and jaw dropping. That time is variable within a single point in space independent of mass and gravity. However events happening outside our bandwidth of time, our universal time, our spectrum of reality, are usually undetectable similar to how light with frequencies outside our visible spectrum are not always instantly detectable by us biologically (sunburn from UV and radiation sickness from gamma rays take longer times to notice). Conversely matter happening outside the range/spectrum of detection of mechanical technology is detectable by our biological technology, our bodies if we become sensitive and tuned or "enlightened" enough. This is because mechanical technology can only perform measurement and exert force in the physical realm in one dimension of time and space at a time. Our consciousness manifest within our biological machines our bodies/minds is able to measure and affect matter in multiple dimensions of space and time in co-operation with the Universe itself and it is not just theory, the evidence is clear in the double slit experiment. Similar in a way to how every single cell in our body responds to thought.
While some physicists say the measurement problem and quantum mechanics are so counter intuitive that they are bizarre. They are not, it is the interpretations that are bizarre, so bizarre they irritated Einstein all his life, Newton had copious amounts of tangible information about the macro realm before he formulated F=ma and all the other stuff. To give credit and respect to the remarkable physicists who have developed remarkable technology using quantum physics when it comes to Theoretical physics they have been disadvantaged and blinded by poor interpretations. They have had virtually nothing but mathematics, flawed logical deduction and an incorrect paradigm based on an optical illusion to go on.
A good and quite funny at times example of how having lots of physical information can still be very baffling can be seen here. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WKfIP4-fu6w
The following few paragraphs and videos are aimed at giving simplified illustrations of the main principles of the mechanics of the Universe before going deeper into the detail.
The above picture [61] illustrates why we detect tparticles as single units when in fact they are always part of a wave but other parts of the wave go undetected in 13 dimensional spacetime. The flower will move with a million others in a field if a wave of fresh air blows. However while the camera is focused on this single flower it will not catch what is happening beyond it. Here is an example to understand it in terms of time...
Hugh Everett was correct, physicists constantly over complicate interpretations, reality is MUCH more simple and intuitive The wave function of QM IS all of reality, it is every wave moving out in every direction. The wave function doesn't collapse, the range of measurement or DETECTION gets reduced to one dimension of spacetime, just as it does in the double slit experiments. The probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics is not relating to the existence of other parts of the wave it is relating to the DETECTION which can only be done on one dimension of spacetime. The probability is the likelihood of which dimension or line of sight the wave will be detected on. However many worlds is not quite correct, only one Universe exists but detection is possible in multiple different dimensions the total amount of possible dimensions that detection can be made on is 13^t/2, divided by 2 because we can only detect possible dimensions in the forward moving trajectory of time. Those moving backwards in spacetime relative to us can not be detected only deduced. Even if we detect an interference pattern on a screen placed in space behind the particle gun in the double slit experiments which is theoretically possible (I say certain, some way or another sooner or later it will be done), these are still from the wave that moves forward in time.
Some short videos which perhaps give a quick and easy grasp of some of the essential elements of the theory are available in the following links. These are only a few minutes long but I think have enough essential information to allow sceptics realise their time will not be wasted reading my Theory of Everything (because this is THE Theory of Everything) and the paper on the double slit experiment.
Time dilation is space/dark matter dilation 3 min
https://youtu.be/YubeIGJRkgg
The 13 dimensions of space/dark matter 5min
https://youtu.be/LcaXZ-1sCPQ
The meaning of Alpha 137.035999 is on the Sean g 137 channel in 4 parts beginning with the logic and how spectral lines appear ending with the math.
The explanation of vacuum energy in real terms which ends the vacuum catastrophe and the mystery of dark energy https://youtu.be/i9gf-dH4SAg
And https://yadi.sk/i/jv76zdb7Pjad3g
Standard model particle shapes deduced using my formula which was posted months before the moun violation (check the dates), where I explain the shape of the muon that explains the larger than expected dipole moment/wobble in effect predicting the structure that explains the violation.
https://youtu.be/hQUWXSdc6IE
And https://yadi.sk/i/MGWcIBCW5gotaw
How matter is formed by light becoming stuck in vortices in the spacetime fabric and the critical biting point between light and matter using the fine structure constant 137
https://youtu.be/zlZ1JebtRD8
And https://yadi.sk/i/qnDcnfGn7ghVaA
Quantum gravity, how gravity works at the quantum level and at the surface of large gravitational bodies ://youtu.be/vJm3VgAh7W4
And https://yadi.sk/i/l7ZeuFfJkrcr5A
The flower represents each point or field node which exists at every intersection in the spacetime field. What we percieve as particles are in fact detections of waves passing through them, our mechanical "real time" detection is limited to one location in 13 dimensional time (and space...but don't panic or think 13 dimensions of space and time must be impossibly complex it is actually very simple as the reader will see in the image below, we can still visualise and do most practical calculations using 3 dimensions of space and one of time. In order to understand how simple it is be aware that a dimension is essentially simply an axis or a line on which points can be plotted or around which space/positions/x can rotate. Some people seem to confuse a realm with a dimension. A realm is a different level of experience or existence within the Universe's realm of possibilities, like the quantum realm and the macro realm, the realms of life and death, the biological realms of conscious awareness and non conscious purely physical experience. To keep it simple for now just view a dimension as an axis/line.) so like the other flowers existing in other dimensions of space and relative time in the photo, other parts of the wave are obscured. This creates the optical and physical illusion that they are moving particles, Similar to how there may appear to be an object passing along the dominoes in this video, when in fact the objects stay in the one position and move when the energy passes (the action begins at 0:27 seconds in) https://youtu.be/vDy2xWpZWVc .
The solution to the double slit experiment and making common sense out of quantum mechanics is this. The wave "function" in quantum mechanics represents the fact that what is detected as a tparticle is always one part of a wave of energy as it passes through a field node/intersection. Although this wave propagates and spreads out as a spherical wave in all directions, measurement is always limited to detection of the wave along one dimension of space and one dimension of time which always corresponds to the wave moving along one line of field nodes appearing like a single particle. We traditionally view space as being 3 dimensional, most celestial objects rotate on one axis but in the quantum realm there are 13 interchangeable dimensions. 3 dominant and 10 minor dimensions within the electromagnetic spectrum. Once a vortex is created in the internal fluid it twists the fabric out of shape so light can no longer pass through. This twist is detected as mass and the effect of this twist means we can detect the lattice/dark matter by collision "touch" or by seeing light bounce back off where it can no longer pass straight through, this is known as matter. It is formed as the field nodes rotate back and forth on these 13 dimensions which alternate with various different combinations of dominant and minor influence as the nodes clump, twist, rebound and release as energy passes from one field node to another, caught in manifold loops which are closed relative to themselves but open just enough to pass along in the field through trillions of nodes a second (to visualise that imagine a mini whirlpool being carried down a stream.)
My favourite way to help people grasp the basic concept of the spacetime fabric is to compare it with fishnet stockings If we put a pen or a jagged object into fishnet stockings and twist it, the fabric gathers around the pen just like mass gathers in clumps due to the vacuum effect created in the ether within the fabric. At the same time the fabric surrounding the clump is stretched, that is, it expands but inwards not outwards. It is an inwards expansion in the Universe, the detail of how this leads to gravity, the optical illusion of an outwards expanding universe and redshift are all explained in detail in the paper and summarised in this short video https://youtu.be/1RItYd2sWXw
The spacetime fabric/dark matter lattice generally referred to as "The Universe"or cosmic web is a transparent physical lattice existing in a void, the particle in quantum mechanics is the field node which sits at every intersection in the lattice, the wave function is the wave of light(energy/electromagnetism) passing moving it making it oscillate. All matter including our bodies are vortexes of light stuck in loops within the field particles, being relayed along, appearing to us like actual particles moving collectively through the space time fabric at up to many thousands of kilometres a second.
So the Earth like all massive objects is a wave of energy moving through spacetime, a mind bogglingly complex wave or collection of vortices. Even the amount of vortices intertwined in one piece of fruit or a human cell amounts to trillions and is mind bogglingly complex, however the extreme prcision and unvarying properties of the spacetime fabric mean the mechanics enable spectacular synchronicity which makes up everything we know as matter. Just like a surfer needs a wave to surf if there were no wave there would be no surfing s/he would be stranded in the water, paddling at best. So too we as souls need waves on which to ride.
The reason why everything in the field passes through in such perfect synchronicity, keeping consistency, keeping the trillions of different shapes, forms and properties of matter is due to the uniformity of the torlectron. Because the field nodes are identical at every position in the field the vortexes which form within them are also identical. They can neither grow beyond the limit imposed by the Planck parameters nor can they reduce in size unless through annihilation in which case they no longer exist. This absolute uniformity creates the condition for perfect synchronicity and consistency in matter throughout the fabric of the Universe. So everything moves in perfect timing keeping perfect shape unable to deviate from form, unable to allow matter to digress into chaos and/or imbalance. It is an extremely difficult concept for the human mind to grasp that we are not made out of solid material but are conscious beings using conscious energy to hold collections of waves and vortices together. Like the evidence the Greeks provided that the world is round while it makes sense on paper, even so our human conditioning finds the reality extremely difficult to accept. Even for me, it is extremely difficult to get my head around the fact a butterfly's wing with its soft powdered colours, a human hair, a wooden table, an electric wire, a bird or plane flying at 50 or 500 kilometres an hour can be made out of these vortices passing through folding and unfolding the nodes in the fabric of the Universe in and out of shape trillions of times and thousands of kilometres a second. While the countless different biological processes simultaneously happen at different speeds within the biological bodies in the one overall suncronicity. But I understand it is so. It really is mind blowing, so much so that some of the planets leading physicists reading it have blown mental fuses and have been unable to pragmatically accept and acknowledge the facts that they subconsciously know, intellectually, are clear and cannot be disputed. This perhaps not just the physics but also due to the metaphysics that are inseparable to the wholeness of the work. With extremely comfortable, revered, repected, wealthy persons (many deservedly, some not so much) promoting wild hypothesis as fact despite the problems, along with the modern popularity of athiesm and some humans percieving themselves as superior it is perhaps shocking, embarassing, unnerving even perhaps frightening that the evidence shows a completely different reality to the ones they have been promoting as fact.
Lambda to my understanding is describing the pressure in the fluid in our region of the Universe which I imagine must be near the edge or surface of a spherical Universe, this creates the balance in growth of mass in any celestial body with a black body at its core* which increases in size over time and therefore in gravity to the inwards stretch of the fabric. As gravity increases the object pulls in more fabric (dark matter/spacetime fabric/cosmic web) this reduces the radius of gravitational spheres which increases the magnification in the gravitational lenses that we look out through to view the Universe, giving the appearance that distant galaxies are moving apart faster than the speed of light. The acceleration is naturally because with more gravity comes more pulling power, the ability to pull in more dark matter. That is the logical solution with no need for assumptions, science fiction nor violations of the speed of light, it explains redshift, more gravity more redshift.
* Any celestial body with a black body or dark star at it's core which is so dense that the energy it creates cannot escape so it propagates and grows within. Such as Sag-A the dark star at the centre of our galaxy, or our own sun which has a much smaller black body perhaps the size of a mountain and most surprisingly but obvious once we think about the separation of continental plates our own planet which has a black body perhaps still only the size of something like a wrecking ball. But which is obviously growing all the time, greating more matter/energy forcing the continents ever farther apart. Energy creation of course proven by the solution to the double slit experiment which reveals that matter is created by propagation but is only measurable in one dimension in any discrete act of measurement.
If one dismisses all that which is logically consistent, verifiable, testable, with no violations of QM or Relativity in favour of what is popular: the outwards expanding universe model then you must go with assumptions, science fiction, theories which are not logical nor testable. Even then when the assumptions and science fiction are introduced the data shows the model is not credible and it is a violation of Occams Law. Data from the Indian astrophysicist teams in 2020 and 2021 [108] showed that the redshift is not just accellerating but that it is in fact speeding up and slowing down in cyclical timing and at different rates in different regions further indicates it is due to passing closer and nearer to gravitational zones.
Einstein always began with common sense, it took him from 1905 until 1915 to come up with the field equations for the common sense. I do the same start with common sense, unfortunately because I dont have a good grounding in complex math it takes me a long time to translate the common sense into maths and the pressure/urgency forces me to make woeful errors along the way which doesnt help. If I had help from someone who can see the logic and has the grounding we might get science back on track faster. As for the Earth thats why t-rex and buddies could grow so large, the Earth was much less massive so they were larger but in relative terms lighter. Our planet is going to keep on growing and eventually melt the crust to become a star, first a brown dwarf, then red dwarf and keep growing. There is no mass gap in the model that makes sense out of everything, everything just keeps growing incrementally.
PROBLEMS WITH THE JEAN'S HYPOTHESIS OF STAR FORMATION AND AN ALTERNATIVE MODEL USING RICCI FLOW
As for Jean's "stars from gas clouds collapsing" theory it makes no sense. It calls for an enclosed sphere which to my knowledge doesnt exist in space it only exists within black bodies. It also assumes that the collective mass of gas particles have influence collectively which is not true, in this sense it treats gravity as a force rather than geometry, the Jeans model works exceptionally well to describe collections of stars, planets, asteroids etc but that is because they already have gravitational bodies, gravity has a finite cut off point as does any coupling, the problem however is that gas clouds do not have any definite gravity so it is a massive mistake to assert that a gas cloud can collapse under its total gravity, it can't because it has none nor can it form any itself unless pressure is applied and in space there is no mechanism to allow that. I have yet to ever read of anyone putting a gas into a sealed vacuum and the gas forming any clumps, the idea of a gas in outer space forming them may be popular but it isn't credible science. Yes every atom has a gravitational pull but gravity is a very weak force. For example if we use the example of the elastic fabric sheet often used to depict gravity where a heavy object is placed in the centre then balls thrown in which move in orbits around the central object, they spin in orbits and eventually fall in and rest beside the central heavy object. So lets replace the object in the centre with a lump of sand that is the same weight as the original central object, spread this sand evenly all over the fabric. Each grain of sand exerts a bit of weight on the fabric but they will not all fall into a central area and form a ball of sand again. It will just sit there indefinitely unless another object is put into the centre and some falls in, even here most of it will not move much, most will remain spread out. To illustrate the repellant nature of charge causing phenomenal movement replace the sand with fleas and we get lots of collisions of fleas but still no formation of any growth of anything resembling a massive object with large gravity. As we know there is collosal amounts of dust and gas even in the solar system like many other regions around stars but it is always moving and as yet there is no evidence for any eclosed sphere in outer space, the closest things resembling anything near such a sphere are regions like the orc cloud around the solar system but logic common sense tells us it is formed as a result of the suns gravity and activity not vice versa because it is not an enclosed region it is itself a gas and dust cloud in constant movement with no centre of mass other than the sun. That model simply does not work. It may have been the best until now but it doesn't add up.
What I propose is that blobs or bubbles of hot dense plasma are formed within the sun and ejected to form planets and stars. The mechanism for such a bubble or blob coming from an inner region of dense hot plasma around the core of a star such as our sun is consistent with the mathematics of Ricci flow "which is often said to be analogous to the diffusion of heat and the heat equation" [112] The theory, supported by the mathematics is that a piece of dense plasma is stretched away from the main region of dense plasma and forms a sphere in it's own right. A sphere which will move outwards towards the outer layers of the sun due to it's circular nature pushing against the geometrical gravity of the sun which has the fabric pointing inwards towards the core. The newly formed sphere having its own smaller black body centre causing gravity would essentially be geometrically opposite to the gravity affecting elements. As the strands of the fabric are stretched and tightened into smaller angles near the suns core the new blob would be squeezed out and ejected similar in a sense to a small ball pinched between a finger and thumb. This is because while in the region of dense plasma the geometrics of gravity point inwards to the suns core but once a new sphere is extruded from the region it's gravitational geometry is pointing towards its own centre ànd if large enough will cause a tiny black body to form at it's core, this sphere unlike electron orbitals is not moving within the fabric strands which are pulled tighter by the stars gravity, it has the strands of the fabric moving within it and having it's own centre of gravity pushes against the gravity of the star, pushing it out from where the strands are tightly squeezed together towards regions where they are further apart. A tiny black body to begin with but which by nature will continue to grow for eternity (unless some other as yet unknown force acts upon it) after being ejected to become a planet then a star and eventually a black body or neutron star pulsar. While 2 supermassive black bodies can merge due to their gravity a newly formed black body formed just outside the black body in a star would have a much smaller gravity. Also the fact that it has an event or no event horizon where no matter or light can enter means it would be bombarded with massive amounts of pressure from the plasma and most of that pressure would be concentrated between the stars black body core and the newly formed black body. Effectively the new black body would be hit by massive amounts of pressure and sent hurtling at phenomenal speed away from the star's core to a region of less pressure. Logically completely away from the star and into inter stellar space to then slow in momentum due to the stars gravity and settle into an orbit around the star.
EXPERIMENT TO RECORD A SPHERICAL WAVE OF ENERGY PROPAGATING AT THE QUANTUM LEVEL
To illustrate why measurement in multi dimensional spacetime is limiting detection imagine we have a camera which is so finely tuned it flashes and lights an object but only records anything arriving back in an exposure corresponding to as near as we can get to one Planck time unit, this set to capture the very very first photons of light arriving back. Any light arriving back any later than the exposure time arrives back too late and misses the exposure "window of opportunity". If the object being filmed is curved (like a wave) then because any light besides the very nearest part of the wave is deflected after the first arriving photon it will arrive back at the camera too late so it is never recorded. One experiment to test for this would be to fire a particle gun and have lasers or electron guns set in the inside wall of a dome dome then fired out towards the central large particle gun. These fired in intervals of the smallest possible units of time one after another. The bigger the central "tparticle" the better, perhaps a bucky ball for example. The photons and electrons fired in rapid succession one after another to make up a movie. We could run this experiment with multiple cameras located on the inner wall of the dome each positioned beside a laser or an electron gun that is pointing in the same direction, all pointing towards the particle gun at the centre. With fine tuning and timing we set the cameras to record simultaneously, so what once appeared as a single tparticle say a bucky ball in one image will, when combined with all the other images, show up in a 3D image as one part of a spherical wave of energy moving through the field of nodes/RIKs causing each to oscillate and reveal the wave spread out.
Dark Matter.
The original movement of stars within distant spiral Galaxies which confirmed that dark matter exists is primarily due to tides within the ether within the fabric. Similar in a sense to objects moving in an ocean. Dark matter [109] gradually became more prominent as a Theory for unidentified matter in the Universe as a result of many different observations by various astronomers mainly throughout the 20th century who all figured out that there must be more susbstance in the Universe than what we know as matter. It's existence became widely known and verified most notably in many academics minds by the work of Vera Rubin, Kent Ford and Ken Freeman in the 1960s. Their work on spiral galaxies discovered that stars and planets in spiral Galaxies appeared to be violating the laws of gravity. This is because they move at such a speed around the central black body that the gravitational force alone should not be able to hold them, using gravity as the only explanation for distinct astral objects being held together in the macro realm does not add up because their speed is up to 5 or 6 times greater than gravity would hold. Such objects should, using current understandings of gravity, be flung far out into the vast empty regions of the Universe, this however does not happen, they are held tighter to the galaxy centre than expected. The fact is that it is the ether that pulls them together similar to how magnetic material is held together as in magnets. While these astral objects are pushed outwards by their own momentum and the momentum of the galactic waves the medium that they move in creates zones of negative pressure. As ether is drawn away by gravitational bodies it leaves negative pressure in its wake so the entire region and all that is in it is pulled back by the negative pressure. Just like a wave in the ocean may fling a shoal of fish into an opening of a rock pool with a surge of water as the wave and the water receede they draw the fish back out into the ocean. If the fish were thrown in so far that they became cut off they could travel further into the pool independent of the wave but to contextualise the analaogy there is no region of these galaxies cut off from each other. They are all in the same connected system so as the negative pressure builds up towards the central black body the outer objects are drawn back by the suction that the negative pressure creates.
Like time, matter cannot go backwards or stand still, it always moves forwards only appearing to slow down or remain stationary relative to other forward moving objects as articulated in Einstein's Special Relativity. The mistake in this instance has been thinking that because time always moves forward it must be one dimensional but matter always moves forward yet is multi dimensional, so is time. (the next part takes perhaps more thinking than I imagined it would when writing it, reading it back I can see why some people find it confusing.)
While most physicists seem to mistakingly think that time slows down nearer large gravitational zones it is the MEASUREMENT of time that indicates it slows down. However it doesn't, synchronised consciousness relates within a single bandwidth of universal time and each macro moment has potentially 13^tn possible timelines, so everything in our detectable reality exists in a single detectable universal time that we collectively focus on, with variations in measurement depending on gravity (I provide formula to calculate the volume of time). What the double slit experiment reveals is much more unexpected, profound and jaw dropping. That time is variable within a single point in space independent of mass and gravity. However events happening outside our bandwidth of time, our universal time, our spectrum of reality, are usually undetectable similar to how light with frequencies outside our visible spectrum are not always instantly detectable by us biologically (sunburn from UV and radiation sickness from gamma rays take longer times to notice). Conversely matter happening outside the range/spectrum of detection of mechanical technology is detectable by our biological technology, our bodies if we become sensitive and tuned or "enlightened" enough. This is because mechanical technology can only perform measurement and exert force in the physical realm in one dimension of time and space at a time. Our consciousness manifest within our biological machines our bodies/minds is able to measure and affect matter in multiple dimensions of space and time in co-operation with the Universe itself and it is not just theory, the evidence is clear in the double slit experiment. Similar in a way to how every single cell in our body responds to thought.
While some physicists say the measurement problem and quantum mechanics are so counter intuitive that they are bizarre. They are not, it is the interpretations that are bizarre, so bizarre they irritated Einstein all his life, Newton had copious amounts of tangible information about the macro realm before he formulated F=ma and all the other stuff. To give credit and respect to the remarkable physicists who have developed remarkable technology using quantum physics when it comes to Theoretical physics they have been disadvantaged and blinded by poor interpretations. They have had virtually nothing but mathematics, flawed logical deduction and an incorrect paradigm based on an optical illusion to go on.
A good and quite funny at times example of how having lots of physical information can still be very baffling can be seen here. https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=WKfIP4-fu6w
The above picture illustrates the universal structure of every intersecting point in the field (The space time fabric/Higgs Field/cosmic web/electromagnetic field, all the one same field). One field node or "RIK" is connected to 26 others via 13 dimensions made of connecting expandable strands/pipes/springs/threads or TREDDs through which a medium flows and through which waves of energy as light "photons" and vortices as matter move (giving 26 dimensions at any point when matter is passing).
This short video gives a brief overview of the basic block https://youtu.be/LcaXZ-1sCPQ
Planck's constant h is describing the circumference of the harmonic oscillator, how far a wave has to traverse within the quantum node to get from one side to the other, waves of energy moving through the internal fluid/ether/flazzma.
The reader should remain cognisant that when I refer to 1 or 3 dimensional time and 3 dimensional space in the paper I am referring to these in relation to measurement for practical purposes. While time and space each have 13 dimensions at the quantum level only 3 of space and one of time are useful for most practical measurement/calculations. 26 dimensions would logically quickly become extremely difficult/complex to work with which I am informed by studying is evidenced when mathematicians try to make exact computations using quantum mechanics. These computations it seems quickly become very complex, needing massive supercomputers to do some calculations they wish they could do.
If we reproduce the structure in the macro realm we may find that the 13th chord h is the chord that generates the vibration that potentially eliminates disease, preserves food, creates new forms of matter, leads to near eternal youth and reversing aging to a state of youth etc... the potential is theoretically unlimited
This is where physics meets metaphysics. This is the quantum point of causality, nothing is detectable without movement, when we have movement of the field node "0" then we have something detectable, the ripple of the wave through the nodes. The only thing that can explain causality in a field that always moves towards equilibrium is something exerting a force from outside the field, so it must be a conscious force which is an intelligent force that we traditionally know as spirit or in a non physical body, a soul. So the soul is the source of causality in everything that can be experienced/detected within the physical Universe. So "we", that is, all conscious bodies/souls in a very real sense created every tangible material thing in the Universe, while the field the Universe could be said to be the physical body of God we are the spirit of God or as Rastafarians say i and i, the universal conscious souls who live in unwavering truth are God. This backs up and makes clear the previously strange oddity in the very first page in the Torah and bible, where it is written God said "Let there be light". If God were the all powerful creator, who would s/he ask to let it be so? God is asking someone to allow for something to be permitted. It is the field which i and i (God) are asking the physical God, the Universe to allow us create ripples within. It seems that the field is alive and responsible IT "loves us" and wants to both experience us and for us to experience "IT" and each other. ...
________________
This is the main hosting website of the long awaited scientific and philosophical paper, the Theory of Everything and it's companion paper with the solution to the double slit experiment on
https://doubleslitsolution.weebly.com/springtimetheory.html
And
https://doubleslitsolution.weebly.com/doubleslitexperiment.html most of which, but not all is now redundant. Which I am too busy to edit as of now (Sunday 5th June 2022) but which I do not want to erase completely because some ideas are still relevant, and anyway its a bit more fun. The same applies for some sections in this paper, so please be understanding that some information relating to the double slit experiment in the other paper may be now redundant. The field structure remains the same from the start of my work 3 years ago. Please also be cognizant that when I talk about multidimensional time it is relativistic time, measured time. Not quite the wild over active imagination ideas of time wormholes and time travel but even so the new ideas have some real physics surprises limited by the measurement problem such as "particles" getting lost in different undetectable dimensions of time at CERN.
While many expected this paper, the Theory of Everything, to be a purely physics paper it cannot be. The logic revealed by the dynamics of the Unified Field show that consciousness is an integral part of the logic. The evidence shows that the field is alive and responsive to conscious focus, our bodies like all matter are made of pure energy/light moving through the "Heavens" (as we only know of one, for sure...Heaven) and the only logical explanation for "us" is that we are conscious beings "souls" existing inside the strands of the field holding light/matter together as biological bodies (when our consciousness enters or connects to it and is attached we become "alive" as beings of pure light trapped in vortices) so we must delve into realms outside physics known traditionally as "metaphysics" as well as physics to explain those parts of physical phenomena which cannot be quantified using numbers.
The understanding of this, the correct model has implications for all disciplines and fields in science but also religion, family, human relationships and communities. Almost all science books and encyclopedias will have to be rewritten. The bible having many flaws and contradictions cannot be viewed as the word of God yet within it is encoded mathematical information which aided me in figuring out the correct model, in the book of Revelation that model is termed "the scroll of heaven".
Page visits counter on the page with attempts to make it fun added 7:19am GMT 15/JAN/2021
The counter here added with the edit to remove the fun and keep it focused on the science added 10am GMT 28/Sept/2021
Re-edited and updated on 27th Nov 2021 so the page counter has again been set to zero, the previous edits can be viewed at https://doubleslitsolution.weebly.com/springtimetheory1.html 3,000+ views and https://doubleslitsolution.weebly.com/springtimetheory31.html 300+ views
with another 1,330 added by 1st Dec 2022
________________________________
. |
Copyright. Sean Giollaighan 06/06/2019 (with later additions and amendments) Copyrighted under CC creative commons licencing. It i.e. any new information, concepts, formula, terms etc revealed by Spring Time Theory (STT) may be reproduced, translated in part or whole always attributing this website address https://doubleslitsolution.weebly.com/springtimetheory.html and youtube channel "Sean g #newphysics137" clearly in the introduction to any publication, website or broadcast with clear reference and links to the website again within the main body/narrative of any such production. Anyone is free to use it, quote it, discuss it, improve it, if anyone wants to reprint and distribute it in print it must be printed on 100% recycled paper.(a "responsible forest management" paper source whwere living trees are cut down is not an acceptable alternative). As this new model means every encyclopedia and science text book will have to be rewritten the new information revealed by me may be used freely in print as long as it is printed on 100% recycled paper or paper from deceased plant fibre (dead leaves and stalks) . From plant fibre that has expired naturally for example fallen leaves or grass/hemp/bamboo stalks left after going to seed.Anyone wishing to distribute it online please use the link to the webpage. A PDF or other format may be made for personal use but only distributed if the website crashes or has other technical issues please. The free weebly service has been fantastic in facilitating this scientific breakthrough and deserves traffic and recognition/thanks, also as updates plan to be added to the update page in due course. Any printouts for groups, classroom, conferences or lecture notes should be on 100% recycled paper where there is recycled paper available in that country/state, for poorer nations who may not have recycled paper available please reprint sparingly and share. I use the copyright mainly to stop others from claiming ownership of my work so that the information can be shared and spread unimpeded, not for any personal gain.
______________________________ ------------------------------------------------------------ INTRODUCTORY NOTES ON STYLE, METHODOLOGY AND PRESENTATION THIS IS NOT ESSENTIAL READING RELATING TO PHYSICS MORE AN EXPLANATION AS TO WHY THE STYLE IS SO UNORTHODOX AND THE UNIQUE PROBLEMS I FACE IN GETTING THIS MODEL SAFELY TO THE PUBLIC I realised the simple solution to the double slit experiment due to an epiphany which the current mistakes in interpŕetations incorrectly ruled out due to physicists failing to see that the incorrect models effectively block one from understanding the simple reality. So bear in mind it has been a significant task to both understand and explain the correct model and how it relates to the data especially to academics convinced their models must be on the right track despite the problems. I focus mainly on the logic with some mathematics but the essential work focuses on the field structure. Much of the complex maths has already been done most significantly in the equations of QM, Relativity and Maxwell's equations. Any serious physicist should be able to use the field and simple mathematics that I provide and run their own complex mathematics to verify I am right rather than expect me to provide every detail, every equation and every subject this relates to. Such an amount of information would surely fill a library and it is an unrealistic expectation/burden. The fact is the big bang violates all known laws of physics and needs science fiction to work, the double slit experiment has had zero testable solutions in 100 years and physicists have failed to unify the 3 main models of Relativity, QM and SMOPP in 100 years of trying. I do, I solve them all in a simple intuitive framework that needs no sci fi or fudges (but opens a box of treasures and mysteries to supply fuel for inquisitive minds for aeons to come). These introductory notes focus mainly on the practical issues of penning this while homeless and trying to communicate/engage with a scientific community that seems dismissive of non academics (generally very aggressively) or anything which comes from outside peer review (which is generally reluctant/unwilling to publish work that disagrees with the popular models) which in this case has been refused at every request. Also considering I show that many particle physicists do not understand the data and will not acknowledge the correct data any peer review risks being delayed by incompetent reviewers trying to get it to fit into the particle model which usually happens when I try to discuss the correct model with academics schooled in the particle model. Most peer reviews insist that it must remain offline/unpublished and solely worked on by selected reviewers which is a condition that cannot be met due to this inherent bias and the potential incompetence it logically leads to. Peer review in the private control of unknown people also holds real dangers as anyone should appreciate, anyone who has watched Terminator, Matrix or other ai stories and aware of the risks of living in a divided world where whosoever controls and has access to information often controls and has access to power. I am urging everyone to take Individual responsibility and help send this viral without seeking confirmation or permission from a percieved superior authority. These notes cover issues I have faced to inform the serious scientists of how errors may occur in the hope the reader is understanding and patient with a style that is very unorthodox and concepts that challenge concepts long held as facts but which are only facts within a one time dimensional, soulless incorrect paradigm. One can align and unify the current data used in the current models but one cannot align the current models of independent particles moving through empty space with this one, hence many ideas previously held as fact must be reviewed and let go. ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Please note that most of this was written and edited online on a used reconditioned $50 mobile phone with a cracked screen, much of it outside, in streets, sometimes in the freezing cold with almost numb hands so please allow for the occasional punctuation or spelling mistake and irregularities in spacing. I am constantly trying to update it and correct errors and always seem to find more, so I expect there are many more still. My phone can't type italics. In a recent edit to the page I spotted an auto correct where i had written "Ghez" and my phone autocorrected it to Gomez so if there are other blatant blunders that I have missed they may be thanks to my auto correct which drives me nuts. I tackled this problem with the simple understanding of the dynamics at play in the double slit experiment, I had no education in quantum physics so have had to try to learn current quantum physics Theory as fast as possible in difficult conditions. Considering that there is so much detail in the different fields of physics it has been impossible to describe every last detail in 3 years (the time frame some students have to cover a specific topic in conducive environments) so if there are more facets of an interaction I do not cover in the logic please use your own common sense and fill in the logic using the field rather than dismiss it because I do not cover every last possible detail. Such a work would likely fill a library. Things are usually easier to learn, follow and engage with when they are fun so I originally wrote the paper with some moments of humour added in the hope that the fun should not just give the mind a few moments to process a lot of new information and that it may help keep people engaged and enjoying the experience. Unfortunately it seems "serious" physicists dont see the funny side so I have rewritten it to exclude the fun in case physicists are holding up science because they percieve they are the butt of the joke. The light hearted version now with many errors that i have since spotted if one prefers to read it is located at https://doubleslitsolution.weebly.com/springtimetheory1.html In one paper using common sense, relatively simple maths and robust logic with evidence and new proposed experiments it solves virtually all the biggest remaining mysteries in science (over a dozen) that have baffled millions of physicists and mathematicians for decades, some for centuries. The framework will surely help explain many more mysteries that I am as yet unaware of. The ultimate prediction from the maths of energy creation revealed by the double slit experiment leads to a very sobering and far from fun atmosphere than the one I anticipated. The fact that the evidence shows that our planet is due to be hit by a nova event from our sun in the very near future is one which had I known it at the time would not have allowed me any room for humour in the paper but as it is done now I will leave it as a webpage and hope it in some way lessens the pressure in the race to prepare for survival which we should now be gearing up for without any further delay. The popular narrative that it was an asteroid that wiped out the dinosaurs has many problems yet is another hypothesis promoted as fact. There are many criticisms but one of the many facts to me that shows it was a micro nova event from our sun is the fact the planet went from an extremely warm and humid tropical planet, even at the poles, that was suddenly plunged into an ice age. While one may argue whether it was a nova event or an asteroid that causes massive fires, the moon to wobble creating massive ocean waves and glass type beads to fall, one thing an asteroid cannot do is cause an ice age. If anything more "metal" in the atmosphere would hold more heat causing the planet to heat up not drop into sub zero temperatures. The only possible explanation I can see is our sun being squeezed to release a massive amount of energy in a very short time and dropping in energy so rapidly it temporarily loses its light (perhaps for weeks, months, years decades or centuries it is hard to tell yet). Given that the Theory of Everything must encompass metaphysics the paper cannot be a strictly clinical, technical paper. Given the solution is clear and works, scientists with integrity have a duty to pass on the science and if any hold it back it will be for subjective reasons, athiest dogma, perhaps they don't like the style or the implications for multidimensional time. That is anti science and anti progress, I hope everyone finds their scientific integrity and shares the papers, even if they find the truth painful, their philosophical dogma destroyed and not hide, obscure or hold them back due to prejudice or personal reasons like the astrophysicists of Galileos time did, as many did to Einstein and as the world in general did with the ancient Greek scientists. It has been written with easy English so should be understandable by most high school science levels and above, even by literate people completely new to the subject. Likewise it has some new essential mathematics but not an excessive focus on complex mathematics and writing explanations in terms only an elite few, those highly educated in physics and mathematics can understand so it should be relatively easily understood by all the same levels ie. almost everyone. Most topics are covered quite well in their relevant wikipedia pages for any newcomers, plus there are many YouTube channels which summarise complex quantum physics and strophysics ideas very well. Some of the references relate to work that are behind paywalls and which exclude/discriminate against the poor. In my current country of residence homeless people are not allowed bank accounts, only people with residential addresses are allowed, so these pay per view papers (along with many online courses) are often inaccessible. Hence I rely mainly on wikipedia which has the links for those with money and bank accounts wishing to read them. The fact is a lot of the complex mathematics reveal a lot of logic and a lot of clues but without a framework to put them into context can lead to a lot of theories with loose ends that have no basis in reality and lead to false conclusions promoted as fact which can and in many cases have become counterproductive to our understanding. The reason I didn't need any knowledge of quantum mechanics or high level mathematics to solve the double slit experiment is because the overall picture is clear, once someone visualises the basic properties, understands the structure and dynamics of the field, like time dilation it is elementary logic which needs zero complex maths to grasp. It just perhaps necessitates that one stops and thinks about it. To use an analogy, comparing physicists understanding of the Universe to the workings of a car. If a mathematician or physicist didn't have access to the engine of a car s/he could still measure exactly how fast or slow it will go dependent on the pressure applied to the brakes, accelerator and which gear it is in. What direction it will travel forwards or backwards dependent on the twist of the steering wheel, whether it is in reverse gear or forward gears, the slope and texture of of the terrain etc one can get very sophisticated mathematical formulae to calculate wind resistance, the effects of gravity going uphill or down etc. but unless one gets inside the engine one still does not know HOW the vehicle is moving. Most educated people have a basic understanding of how an engine works due to combustion or electricity moving pistons, cogs, belts, axels etc without ANY mathematics, it is pure clear logic. We need NO mathematics to understand the logic. This is one problem in physics at present, physicists have all the measurements in mathematics with Relativity and Quantum mechanics to understand to great precision how the universe moves and reacts but they still don't understand the four forces and what is inside "tparticles" This is what I have done but perhaps because I am not using their preferred language of mathematics they are assuming I cannot be as clever as them (one well known celebrity physicist said so straight out in an email that I was arrogant to even think I could solve it when highly educated people "great minds" like him had dedicated their lives to solving it, I tried to explain the simple logic of analysing the front screen but he clearly wasn't listening, he said activity on the front screen was irrelevant. He like everyone else had concluded it must be irrelevant perhaps and I didn't have the peer reviewed experimental evidence yet at the time.) I'm just stating the experience so physicists can see their own blindspot,let go of the models that don't work and look at the facts with an open mind, take it extremely seriously with a sober sense of immediate responsibility). I have used an insight along with evidence in the double slit experiment to go much much deeper into the mechanics, mechanics completely different from the popular "particle as an object" models using logic. Like understanding combustion engines it requires NO mathematics to understand. It requires mathematics to measure, analyse and develop further much of how this breakthrough relates to the current models but I don't have that skillset perfectly aquired yet (being so busy completing the Theory of Everything single handed in the hostile environment of homelessness has posed countless problems. I had to start from scratch with virtually no previous knowledge of physics or mathematical terminology under the stress of the awareness of the growing threat of ai and that this understanding may hold the key to a hope of survival in a planet perhaps on the verge of total/irreversible environmental/habitat collapse with thousands of species going extinct every week it is delayed, has been challenging and exhausting enough, The reader I hope will understand why I haven't got mathematical theory completely assimilated considering it can take people years even decades studying in conducive, stress free, supportive environments to reach complex levels.) I initially hoped Mathematicians and physicists would run the variation on the double slit experiment and get busy at work doing the maths. Unfortunately not, almost 4 years later and 36 months after providing the evidence that supports the theory no Journal that I risked working with will peer review without payment or copyright control, on arXiv I can get no referee to agree to review it. One would have thought with the billions of dollars invested in research to unify all physics there may be a focus group or even one individual assigned the task of at least reading any Theory of Everything that gives an explanation for everything but no, there is no one doing it, Update 24th Jan 2021, I finally found one forum on Reddit dedicated to theories of Everything but so far no response to my post so I don't know if the forum is very active or frequented by serious physicists. One example in this paper where what I have been saying using logic needs no mathematics but after a year I find where someone shows the same but it is said using mathematics is in the section on quantum entanglement. I have been explaining quantum entanglement using simple logic for a year as being caused by the act of measurement forcing the measurement onto one time dimension, when I come across a lecture by Ron Garret [66] showing that the equation for quantum entanglement is the same equation for measurement itself. The famous physicist Richard Feynman whom some now regard as second only to Einstein in genius faced similar contempt from the great mathematicians who developed quantum mechanics. So incensed were they by his use of "stupid" diagrams rather than stick to mathematical equations that they walked out from his groundbreaking lectures and called him an idiot for using his diagrams which have since become an intrinsic part of modelling physics. It seems the greatest leaps forward in thinking often cause the greatest resistance and contempt from the most revered and respected authorities of any era. If Feynman had been living in Galileo's time he would surely have been locked up for life also, if he was doing his work now but penniless with no access to peer review or a lab he would surely be, like I am, insulted, mocked, ridiculed, locked out of social media and science forums, threatened with physical assault and have his work deleted from webspace on platforms like youtube by physicists who consider me showing how a Nobel Prize can be given in error as an arrogant, outlandish assertion regardless of the fact the data vindicates my reasoning and shows flaws in theirs. I have tried to learn mathematics and physics standards of expression in order to get academics to engage with me but in my urgency I have had misunderstandings and expressed things different from the semantics I am trying to communicate. This has had the effect perhaps of making my logic seem incorrect or underdeveloped so I am very wary of formulating or expressing information in mathematical terms. The reality is mathematics is a language form like any other and the logic is very simple. This obsession with mathematics first before and sometimes devoid of solid logic/common sense has been a real problem. ---------------------------------------------------------- SUMMARY OF THE CENTRAL PROBLEM OF QUANTUM PHYSICS: THE MEASUREMENT PROBLEM: While physicists say that the wave function in quantum physics collapses upon measurement this is not true EVERY EXPERIMENT IS A MEASUREMENT what physicists have perceived as measurement collapsing the wave function is just a measurement with different parameters. In the which way experiment they are adjusting the time parameters to a narrower range using the operator "consciousness" î so the expectation value is reduced/focused to a reduced range of the physical properties of the wave, in the which way double slit experiment that expectation value is the reduced area on the back screen. Any and every computation or experiment is a measurement so when we run the double slit experiment and get the interference pattern THIS IS A MEASUREMENT! We are measuring the probability of where a "tparticle" will be detected within the system. When we detect for which way we change the parameters for detection, we adjust the range of time which adjusts the range of location which changes our expectation values. In the first instance the time range is from the beginning of the experiment to the end, the spatial range is an estimated circular area encompassing the locality where the slits are on the front screen (to be confirmed by whoever is the first to seize the opportunity to try some of the new variations/tweaks to the double slit experiments that I propose) and the large area on the back screen/detector. So with a wide range of space and time we get a large range of possible locations where the primary and secondary waves will leave a mark, we have a significantly large range for the expectation value. When we detect for which way we have two measurements of time within the experiment, the first time range is from the beginning to the end of the experiment and another time range is for which way which has the time range subdivided to correspond to every tparticle fired and the space between the slits or other area where detection occurs. Giving a shorter range of expectation values limited to the two bands on the back screen and no marks left on the front screen. Every experiment is a measurement. In quantum entanglement when the scientists measure for the tparticle's' state they set the time parameter to NOW which is set by a possible number of moments in any quantum tick which is defined by the minimum energy level, ħ/2 and the mass, which dictate the moment of oscillation that any 2 or more operators focused on the measurement will share as time moves forward. This information is instantly communicated to all other beings focused on the measurement everywhere in the universe and the scientists at the other location instantly "tune into" the chosen bandwidth of NOW. Thought moves faster than light, it is instant or "local" at every point in the Universe. NOW corresponds to a continuum of one location in 13 dimensional time. NOW can be set along any of the 13 alternating dimensions and time still oscillates in 13 dimensions but measurement is always confined to one in "real time" time continuum. So time will continue moving forward and the tparticle's' properties will be detected corresponding to the oscillation state they were in, in the range along one dimension of time when NOW was initiated, this being dictated by the rotation and orientation of oscillation that time was in when NOW was articulated. Most conscious operations are communicated and executed indirectly on the physical parameters using primary/biological technology such as hands which setup the experiment, consciousness moves eyes which help with alignment, vocal chords and ears which communicate information between other conscious operators, at the quantum level this is information sent by consciousness between different strands of DNA and functional machinery inside cells, such as cell walls, nerves, mitochondria, also secondary technology outside the body such as machinery, communication technology and code. However the time parameters are communicated directly and instantly between all operators involved on the measurement regardless of where they are. On planet Earth that is usually between two inseparable but distinct operators, Human operators and the Universe (the physical body within the void). While physical communication of information is limited by the speed of light conscious information is not. Consciousness sets up and communicates all actions directly or indirectly within any system using physical technology, a body, an experiment, a creation of art. While physical communication of information is indirect and limited by the speed of light, conscious information is communicated instantly between all operators involved in the operation. One reality that physicists have been unaware of which has added to the confusion and inability to understand what quantum mechanics is showing is that in any system there are 2 distinct but inseparable entities. Matter and time. |Ψ⟩ is both matter and time simultaneously, it is a wave of matter propagating out in every direction through a wave of time which is also propagating out in every moment. In any experiment we adjust the parameters of physical matter using consciousness indirectly by manually setting the limits to how matter moves through space but we adjust the parameters of time directly via the operator consciousness. WHY MOMENTUM CANNOT BE MEASURED ACCURATELY IN THE QUANTUM REALM....YET. You cannot expect momentum in an open system like a ball flying through the air to act the same as momentum in a closed system. Physicists are still using the "space is empty" way of thinking despite the fact that Einstein explained that the Universe is made of a fabric. Not metaphorically, actually a physical fabric or lattice. Now if you have an ant for example walking along a fabric. Ants, like light, tend to go full speed, 100% effort all the time unless interrupted. Now imagine you have an ant walking along an old dusty spiders web. So dusty it doesn't get stuck and it is going in the one direction full speed. We can calculate its momentum and where it will be in respect to time as it follows the same path at the same speed however now imagine something twists the web, this affects the path of the ant. So while we calculated the ants path and calculated where it will be in a few seconds when we go back to check for the ant it is stll going full speed forward but it is not where we expected it to be. The whole web has been twisted so the ant has been pulled back or brought forward or sideways by the movement of the web. In the quantum field the object that is pulling and pushing the "electron" from its path in the shell is the nucleus. It may be hard to accept or grasp first time but the nucleus, the bunch of protons and neutrons is in reality a collection of torlectrons stuck in manifolds. The geometrics of the FABRIC that they travel THROUGH means these vortices get stuck in loops. As the vortex leaves one loop (quark) they immediately find the surrounding FABRIC to be curved by their momentum and they enter into another manifold loop, then another, so it continues. (As the wobble (QM:Spin) in the previous manifolds settles down we get the colour flavours of quantum chromodynamics). The geometrics happen to be so perfect that the fabric is pulled tight then momentarily eased and pulled tight in such perfect synchronicity that it appears as if it is a single particle a "proton" "neutron" muon, tau, meson, W,Z boson etc. Meanwhile around the central manifold of the atomic nucleus more vortices form due to the outer twisting of the FABRIC and the fluid inside the fabric is twisted and forms more vortices.... torlectrons. As these form they cannot escape back into the wider fabric, every time they nearly do so the swing of the inner vortices/torlectrons that form the nucleus shift their swing and the electron in the shell is pulled back into the loop around the nucleus. So it is a constant push, pull, twist, like a constant dance of the vortices pulling each other, similar to what sometimes happens to a fallen leaf as it gets spun around in circles in a slightly out of flow bank at the side of a stream almost but never quite making it out into the downstream flow, everytime it almost does another whirlpool pulls it back into the loop. So try as you might you cannot with ease tell where an electron/vortice will be, only a rough idea of where it is likely to be which is dependent on whether the nucleus manifold loops are currently pulling or pushing it relative to the general area of the core....unless you apply the overall principle in which case there is some hope that mathematicians and physicists will finally be able to see the bigger picture and factor in the other electrons. These can never be located or detected within the same time range but given the correct logic process we will (someday) be able to deduce to calculate the overall dynamics and give an exact precise location of every electron all of the time. This is absolutely possible and will be done once physicists let go of the particle travelling through empty space model. For every electron detected surrounding an atomic nucleus there are another 11, which is 12 altogether that are circulating the nucleus. Detection however is limited to one dimension so we can only detect one in each discrete act of measurement. SUMMARY OF THE MATHEMATICAL AND PHILOSOPHICAL MODELS IN PRACTICAL TERMS I have come across many physicists saying even Schrödinger didn't understand what his equation actually means, this is because for 100 years it has been interpreted using the particle idea where individual particles travel through space, so trying to explain it using a false paradigm is bound to lead to confusion. To understand what Schrodingers equation actually means I advise the reader to keep the picture of the 27 connected field nodes, which is shown previously in this page, in view as I explain. For visually impaired listeners using text to voice it is like a cube with identical balls positioned at locations on the cube and all connected to each other with flexible pipes. It has one ball in the very centre, one on each corner 8 altogether, one ball in the very centre of each edge 12 altogether and one ball in the centre of each side 6 altogether, in a sense it may be visualized like a rubik's cube where each mini block on the edges, corners and sides is a sphere and all are connected to a central sphere via elastic bands, giving a grand total of 27 balls or field nodes all connected with the ones on each side touching the one at the centre when at rest, the nodes at the corners and edges having the pipes stretched and connected to the central one. Another way to describe this quantum block is 3 layers of 9 nodes. Worth noting is that in the chinese holy oracle the iChing 3 nines symbolise the father or heaven and in the biblical Gospels Jesus repeatedly stressed that everything he said came not from him but from "the father", given the reality that the double slit experiment reveals it seems clear he was referring to the Universe itself rather than a specifically male being. First it is important to understand that it is describing a wave moving through the field of stationary nodes. Next get rid of the word "function" it confuses people and makes the equation appear abstract. Next be aware of the measurement problem, that the equation only describes one part of the wave as it moves along one dimension of space and time but spreads out in a spherical wave through the field simultaneously in every direction. Next understand that the symbol for the energy in the system, the upside down triangle's three sides represents the value of 3 entities: time, volume and pressure and their values dictate the amount of pushes/energy within that system, the pressure is that of the ether/flazzma that runs throughout all space within the spacetime fabric. While some physicists say π and the Planck constants are just numbers they are not, they represent very important dynamics of time and space. A way to understand mass is to view it as compaction caused by a twist, once mass is initiated with the creation of the vortexes then the 7 touching field nodes are separated by the stretch which must come in and out via the 20 strands that are not touching but connected by the TREDDs. If that harmonic oscillator/RIK is attached to 26 other identical harmonic oscillators and those each to 26 others in a Universal uniform lattice then when one RIK moves that movement pulls on all RIKs connected to it and that twist (quantum mechanics: spin) is propagated in a wave outwards in every direction like cogs twisted back and forth in a watch/clock, so then we apply the time measured in one dimension of time and space to the wave |Ψ(t)⟩ we can deduce its overall magnitude in 13 dimensions of space and 13 dimensions of time (all outwards directions) using all the information in iħ.d/dt giving us iħ.d/dt|Ψ(t)⟩ so now we have the translation of Schrödingers equation into classical relatable, meaningful terms. It is a wave of energy spreading outwards through the ether/flazzma within the spacetime/dark matter lattice in all directions from the source of the wave detected by the movement of the RIKs which oscillate, rotate back and forth from side to side as they are moved by the passing wave. To understand why time is also 13 dimensional as well as space we apply Special Relativity consider a science fiction thought experiment. If we had a clock positioned at any location on a sphere and imagining we have a way to detect that clock using a sub quantum way to detect a theoretical sub quantum type light form then at any recorded moment each possible position within a loop will show a different time to an external observer even if we assume a universal time. While we mark the completion of a loop at a specific point in space like we do with a pendulum there are multiple different possible locations where we can place that marker. So within the period between revolutions time will be the same at each location in space but different to the observer affected by the 13 different dimensions of space. If each point on the surface of a sphere had a clock they would all show a slightly different time at a hypothetical scale of time even shorter than the Planck time to the observer when recorded at any specific moment similar in a sense to how any clocks situated on the Earth would show different times at any one moment to an observer on the moon. While Time dilates in proportion to mass measured at intervals along one dimension it is also in reality 13 dimensional. So while we measure and detect along one dimension of time and one of space, that detection is only at one point in an oscillation where time and space are both 13 dimensional. However each can be treated as 3 dimensional for most practical purposes. Again, always bear in mind that Special Relativity and multidimensional time relates to the physical measurement of time only, it does not relate to time the entity which is Universal, constant and one dimensional/linear in the conscious realm which is where we experience/detect it in our minds. Once we understand the nature of the field we know that the wave emanates out in all possible directions so while the Schrödinger Equation shows that the energy moving along one dimension is conserved. We simply can't detect or experience it as long as we focus along only one dimension of time but the interference pattern in the double slit experiment reveals the evidence. Once we open our minds and hearts what we see and experience in life is completely different, essentially what most people experience is comparable to just the surface of the tip of the iceberg. Knowing this we realise that the energy and potential in the Universe is unlimited, we are only limited by our fears, our beliefs and our willingness to accept newly discovered realities. THE SOLUTION TO BELLS THEOREM This short 11 minute video illustrates the common sense solution to Bells Theorem which previously seemed bizarre to just about everyone. The logical mechanics and the MATHEMATICS that explain and demystify Bell's Theorem are explained in this 11 min video. https://youtu.be/46TR2ZeBJho MAIN PREDICTIONS *The shape of the muon which I explained and posted in a video on my channel here https://youtu.be/hQUWXSdc6IE months before the muon violations were announced effectively predicted there would be inequality/instability in the symmetry. * The shape and movement of muons, taus, mesons, the Higgs, W and Z bosons. (Higgs shape already found to correspond to the dynamics I predicted before I knew it was already known to have a Mexican hat shape.) * That the redshift from distant Galaxies is due to energy lost due to gravity passed en route not because they are moving further away. Already verified by Andrea Ghez's team's work on SO-2 (which I have heard physicists say is a rather uninspiring name so I'm going to call it "baby Ghez" in honour of astrophysicist Andrea Ghez who calls it just that "my baby".) recording it's loss of energy to gravity and applying common sense but further Verifiable by measuring the redshift of individual stars, by comparing the difference in values of redshift when they are close and far away from the sun or if the energy of the sun affects the value perhaps when they are far or near the surface of the moon, it may be a very tiny difference due to the relatively low gravity of the moon but if the technology is sensitive enough then that difference will be detectable. * That time is multi dimensional verifiable by analysing marks left on the front screen with the slits in the double slit experiment. There is nothing different done to the front screen when running the experiment both ways but when detected for which way the front screen will register no marks. When not detecting for which way the front screen will have numerous marks. There is no variation in the physical dynamics happening, proving the change is in the time dynamics which is affected by the setup of the experiment and the communication of the 2 conscious operators, in mankind's case man and the Universe. * Sooner or later we will observe a Higgs Boson disappear in the ATLAS collider "decaying into nothing" or leaving no other tparticles as they are sent backwards in time therefore outside our detectable reality. This has already been partially happening with some decays happening outside our detectable time but no one seems to have realised it. * A new tparticle I call a FUB with a mass of 6.643mev/c² and a lifetime much shorter than any other tparticles with mass * We can rig an experiment to fire an electron straight ahead in a vacuum but by adjusting the parameters of time using consciousness it will hit a screen located at the side rather than the screen the electron gun is pointed to and fired at. * Hawking radiation is half correct in tgat heat is radiated but incorrect in thinking rhwy are black holes and decrease in size to evaporate over time, nothing can enter a dark star (not a black hole they don't exist), the whole current model of stars and black holes falls apart when one mentions the anomalies (which Spring Time Theory addresses). What the field shows is that the common interpretation of black holes is very incorrect, black and white holes are one and the same, black bodies of clumped dark matter in different states of luminosity, in it's state of brightness a star and where it is in a low state of luminosity a dark star (mistakenly called black holes). This is what they are, regions where dark matter, the spacetime fabric lattice has been clumped into compact balls of maximum density. I had previously hypothesised that stationary black holes don't exist in reality because it is the momentum of the spin almost at the speed of light which traps the light inside (there definitely are no singularities of infinite density...I have learned that singularities in physics tend to indicate that the hypothesis is wrong. Among many other reasons if singularities existed then common sense tells us that the radius of black holes would not grow because matter entering would be drawn into the singularity once inside secondly once we understand the field we know there is a finite point of density which corresponds to the Planck scale so the theorised singularity of infinite density CANNOT exist. This may look fine mathematically but it is not credible or possible in the real world of physics, for any singularities to exist in hypothetical black holes or in the big bang one must accept a slew of sci-fi assumptions and ignore almost every known law of physics in favour of that sci-fi, which is not science, it is science fiction. So while no matter can escape it is because the passage ways for energy in the TREDDs are stretched so tight their diameters are reduced so much they are closed off so nothing can easily get in or out, unless another massive body (black body) stretches them apart enough to merge. With the fabric of spacetime pulled in so tight it is drawing dark matter in from all areas of spacetime at a much greater rate due to the increased compaction therefore the increased gravity and increased accelleration of the stretch and redshift. * If we fire identifiable photons at the reflectors on the moon we will detect less arriving back when the moon is moving away from us in space and time as compared to when identifiable photons are fired at it when it is coming closer to us in space and time. * The light and matter ejected in quasars' "jets" does not come out from the black body region it is produced where it is detected as coming from due to the friction of the twisted space time fabric. Verifiable perhaps by analysing the light which I predict will be from the fabric's kinetic energy as the RIKs collide in phenomenal numbers at phenomenal speeds. * Another prediction which does not come from me but which is consistent with the physics of energy creation and my unified field Theory is evidence that strongly indicates that the Earth gets hit by a micro nova from the sun every 12,000 years, the last one wiping out the wolly mammoths and according to the evidence the build up to the next one has begun. If it does and we are not prepared it would be disastrous. A series of disastrous events would happen including a new swift incoming ice age and most perhaps all electric networks will be devastated, which almost certainly includes satellites, phones and supply chains. Government officials say they are prepared for solar ejections, they are not prepared in any way for a nova event. This calls for a much increased worldwide cooperation and awareness. ENERGY QUANTISED IS.... Perhaps the biggest question in all of physics is "what is energy". It is very seldom mentioned exactly what it is because until now physicists have been unable to understand and quantise it...energy in it's single quantised form is a push! An electron volt is representative of a single push of a RIK by a torlectron (vortex in the ether/flazzma) carried on a wave (of electromagnetism) hitting it at high speed. An electromagnetic wave of energy is just that, waves of the ether pushing moving forward through the field. It is logical to assume that the medium that moves through the fabric of spacetime, the ether/flazzma, the "cosmic blood" coursing through the cardiovascular system of the universe is made up of sub quantum realm nodes/RIKs, it is logical to assume they are perfectly spherical and it is logical to deduce that when a force pushes on them they are pushed against each other and that push spreads outwards through the network. It explains electromagnetism, charge, the speed of light and many more previously measured but unexplained mysteries in physics as you will find with further reading. As can clearly be seen in the video evidence of the double slit experiment time and matter have an inverse relationship in 3 main dimensions in relation to measurement/detection (this is evident in Special Relativity. An electron acting in time like a particle leaves a mark in matter like a wave, when it is detected acting in time like a wave it leaves a mark in matter like a particle. This law is representative of a metaphysical law and in physics it is representative of a certainty principle which I call Lucy's certainty principle. In physics the shorter the time range the greater the probability that we will detect a "tparticle" hit a specific area on the screen. That may appear like common sense and like many laws of physics it is but someone must articulate it, here the number is explicit in the principle, when measured in one dimensional time (as we always do) we have a mark left in a specific area in matter in the probability ratio of t∝1/m³ (m for mass or matter). What is not so clear but revealed by the interference pattern in the double slit experiment is that matter is created and spreads out in all directions but is inaccessible to detection in our bandwidth of time/experience. It is beyond our reach. In metaphysics. In mindful meditation the less material attachment we have the closer we get to a full experience of the physical, in consciousness it is described as living in the moment, the more exact and concentrated on the moment we are the more matter we are in touch with. Yogis, prophets and chi workers describe seeing auras (tiny photon waves produced by the oscillations of atomic waves merging and gaining momentum into larger waves), angels (beings of pure light and the effects of chi manipulation in healing, martial arts shows the threshold of tolerance to pain is increased, the metabolism can be slowed so slow that a heartbeat is barely detectable, the increased ability to survive without water or sustenance is increased and disciplined practitioners are even studied as causing physical effects on inanimate matter which this field shows is very likely and due to the movement of the ether/flazzma through the field.) The more material possessions we have the farther we get from living in the moment so end up sensing/detecting and experiencing less matter in our "spectrum" of reality so even when we have more material things we experience and enjoy them less, epitomised perhaps by a child who gets a truckload of expensive toys for a birthday or Christmas oblivious to the material value or attachment to material value and then ends up playing for days with a cardboard box that one present came in with little to no interest in the other expensive toys). When we focus solely on the physical part of reality we detect less intuitively, using intuitive deduction from what we feel out of all that is happening. Similar to how you the reader are only seeing the written words but if you now stop, keep your eyes facing the words but change your conscious focus you can see the whole room, (park, forest, airport etc) where you are reading this in your peripheral vision. For those visually impaired listening to this you suddenly notice the wind, cars, conversations happening around you. For everyone you can also now feel your feet, tingle, the breath pass through your nose, the blood pump through your veins. The less we focus on possessing the material the wider and richer is the experience. (Hence almost certainly why it necessitated me giving up a good well paid job and house, losing every material comfort, security and possession, meditating and fasting with only water in prolonged lonely isolation in order to understand the essence of time and focus the simple logic that was happening in the double slit experiment when I came across it. Of course it seems obvious once I point it out but that simple insight eluded Einstein and everyone else for over 100 years. Those who were focused solely on the physical mechanics, probably seeking to find an ingenius and spectacular solution. GRAVITY IS NOT A SEPARATE FORCE IT IS THE PATH OF ENERGY, MATTER (TORLECTRONS:VORTICES OF NEGATIVE PRESSURE/VACUUM ENERGY) DICTATED BY THE ANGLES BETWEEN THE FIELD INTERSECTIONS Gravity exists when m≥6.643Mev/c² Below 6.643Mev/c² there is no gravity, light and electrons have no gravity but their forward movement through spacetime is affected by objects that do have gravity because their PATH is pulled by gravity. This is because there is no change in angles in the field when energy is detected as a photon or an electron because it exists and is detected at a single field node "RIK". Gravity comes into effect when 13 or more field nodes get clumped together by the vacuum effect of negative pressure in the medium within the spacetime lattice to form a FUB a "fundamental unifying block". These FUBs seem to be the manifold shape that has been mistaken by particle physicists for the subatomic particles known as quarks. (However I am reluctant to call them quarks because they manifest and have dynamics which can be very different from how they behave when identified as quarks.) This reduces the angles between the lattice connections. This is only stable long enough to have any effect when there are 13 or more nodes drawn together each with the mass of an electron. An electron unlike most other standard model tparticles is not pulled back by gravity when moving forwards. It is only pulled sideways by gravity. Like light only it's path is affected by gravity, it continues to move forward but arcs in towards gravitational zones. TParticles above 6.643Mev/c² travelling away from gravitational zones can be halted and pulled back by gravity because the angles in the intersections in the lattice behind them are less than the angles between intersections in the forward path. Because they are moving through more than one strand of the spacetime fabric this leads to resistance which slows down halts and reverses their movement through the spacetime lattice. Similar in principle to how someone moving forward along a zipline is not affected by a neighbouring zipline but if the thrill-seeker is holding onto 2 or more separate ziplines as s/he moves forward this causes resistance when those lines start to move apart and s/he will slow down, halt and move back when the lines are so far apart that the resistance is greater than the forward force. Neutrinos are not pulled back by gravity either because they are waves of kinetic energy detected at single field intersections "RIKs". Gluons while having zero mass are only affected by gravity because they only exist where there are 2 or more FUBs and the energy passing through them is not detected separately due to the tension holding them taut but as an intrinsic part of the 2 or more interacting FUBs' overall mass. EQUATION FOR MASS ENABLING US TO DEDUCE THE HIDDEN SHAPE AND DYNAMICS OF STANDARD MODEL PARTICLES M=(4/3.πc³-El Mev/c²).ne.nx.p.3Δt In its most basic theoretical form mass is a description of the amount of compaction of the spacetime fabric caused by a torlectron identified as an electron "e" arriving at angles twisting the field intersection the "RIK" x, the total number of field nodes/RIKs/intersections "RIKs"within the group (standard particle) nx, the overall momentum of all these field nodes interacting p by any time dilation 3t one for each dimension of time. In one electron that is one photon arriving above a certain energy and hitting above the critical angle with no internal time dilation. In the electron. m=OY.∠.x.p.t Where OY is the torlectron a spherical wave/vortice. Luckily we know the value of one single field node excited into a state with detectable mass, the electron, so we get M=0.511Mev/c².ne.nx.p.3Δt When we break down the detected energy from the total energy (E proper) in the electron we get M=(4/3.πc³-El Mev/c²).ne.nx.p.3Δt (Delta t for the change in time caused by moments of time dilation, El for energy lost to ripples in the TREDDs-detected as neutrinos). This equation helps us deduce the shape and structure of the standard model tparticles explained in detail with multiple examples in the section on mass. For example it allowed me determine a shape which corresponds to the "Mexican hat" of the Higgs Boson before I was aware that it was described as having a mexican hat shape. It also leads to the prediction of another tparticle the "FUB" fundamental unifying block formerly identified to be a group of tparticles:quarks. This shape however is not just a component of protons and neutrons but also in muons, tau, mesons. E in E=mc² only describes detected energy at one location while energy is also transmitted from the same source but is undetected in the measured mass. So the true equation for total energy for detected mass and free moving undetected mass (most commonly as neutrinos) is derived from c=tdp in 3 dimensions c³=t.V.p E=c³ P for momentum/pressure which has previously been omitted due to the mistaken conclusion that there is no universal fluid. Explained in full in the model. (© 7:37am central European time 18/jun/2020) E=c³ has been previously copyrighted but the revised equations explaining it were completed at the above time. TIME=SEPARATION Physically and metaphysically. In the physical realm we detect time when the RIKs are separated from each other and the TREDDs become stretched (which they always are even to a slight degree in "outer space") referred to as"time dilation"). With more distances for electromagnetic waves to travel through the fabric near gravitational bodies, clocks measure time as going slower. In the conscious realm we detect/sense time, becoming more or less aware of it depending on the degree of togetherness or separation from who and what we love. The degree of oneness with other consciousness beings who, by and large, trust in nature to provide, is clearly directly inversely proportional to the amount of physical attachment we gather and hold onto. Like gravity there is perhaps a cutoff point to how far we go before attachment takes a lethal grip. To make our lives secure and enjoy all the treasures this paradise planet provides but not at the expense of others seems a fair and privileged place that we are blessed with and should be grateful for. Generally less attachment to the physical means more oneness with the Universal consciousness, difficult for some physicists to accept perhaps but one striking piece of evidence being that the Theory of Everything was solved by me. With no physics education, no particular interest in physics, in one year, homeless on a cheap reconditioned phone I solved the basic structure and mechanics of the Grand Unified Field Theory, I did what millions of the worlds "brightest minds" Einstein included, and many trillions of dollars pumped into research and education failed to do in 100 years, failed to even come close to, in fact developing a paradigm that was making it harder or impossible for anyone indoctrinated in that paradigm to solve. Having to learn modern physics theory and quantum mechanics to get scientists to listen. Often while sleeping on streets, and all the stress, hunger and uncertainty that comes with it, with sporadic access to the internet and having my work destroyed and blocked from forums and social media by people trying to protect the popular but unworkable outwards expanding universe model. I am making the point, detachment from security in material things, having Faith in God/the Universe, with respect and non violence to all living beings enabled me to reach a level of consciousness which allowed me see clearly what has been staring everyone in the face for 100 years. This is not opinion, it is fact, clear for anyone able to face it, it is science, I did it. This is not gloating, arrogance or any kind of triumph, I obviously care nothing for monetary prizes or rewards, I believe God/the Universe will provide the rewards and it already has in many ways. To see this world have a chance to come back from the present horrors, destruction and uncertainty to one of hope, respect and a sense of one human, even better, one Earthling family unified in some ways by this simple but profound understanding of what μ=î|Ψ⟩ means, would be the greatest reward I can imagine. That our separation decreases and we find ourselves more time for each other. That we apply this new understanding of measurement to readjust how we live so we may understand in an instant where true empowerment comes from...Love. The further that love extends beyond romance, families, tribes, nations, species, planets, Galaxies, the greater the true empowerment is to be found. Energy is movement/vibration generated by the force exerted by the field. The force cannot be proven using physical measurement, only it's affects can be measured and quantified physically. The force can only be understood using primal logic. The field is conscious/alive and the force is XXXX? One should read the philosophical explanation to understand the force because there are a lot of misconceptions about what it actually is. To get my definition of the primal conscious force read the model. composed and CC copyright 21:00/9pm central European time April 28 2020. The below picture is of a 13 node "kissing ball" structure the fundamental unifying block "FUB" which is found in all standard model tparticles with mass above that of an electron. Previously thought of as tparticles:quarks. [62a] (apart from the large neutrinos) . |