FOREWORD
Richard Feynman is famously quoted as saying [1] "If you think you understand quantum mechanics then you don´t understand quantum mechanics" This was true at the time but not any more, now we can. The essence of the supposed incompatibility of quantum mechanics and Relativity is due to a series of false conclusions, failure to  to understand that everything happens within the spacetime fabric and that spacetime is a physical lattice not empty space and incorrect interpretation of data. The truth can be summed up in one paragraph.

"The particle in quantum mechanics is a particle attached by flexible elastic type lines connecting each one to a uniform number of other quantum particles at every point in the field. The conclusion that  the particle nature of light  rules out an ether is incorrect. There is an ether but it does not permeate all of space rather it permeates all space inside the spacetime fabric and waves of energy move through it. These waves of energy cause the quantum particles to move relative to the particles they are connected to. At times they momentarily stretch away from each other, at times they bang against each other and at times they momentarily get stuck to each other as waves loop between two or more causing them to bind momentarily leading to "matter". Usually light passes forward through the field but once a loop is created the external light then bounces off and we see or detect matter. These momentary connections are relayed along the field and all affected particles oscillate as they are passed. Because we (ourselves collections of intertwined vibrations passing through the field) are moving relational to other waves, when we analyse quantum phenomenon because all collections of waves including us move at thousands of kilometres a second through the field it appears like the waves themselves are particles, in reality it is the oscillations which reveal the field particles form/shape and collectively this adds up to all the matter in the universe. Gravity is not a force per se but an effect due to quantum field strings being stretched and objects moving towards the point of least resistance. Beyond the quantum particle level there is no gravity and there is no infinite singularity in a black hole, hence why they grow in mass. The hidden variables which are universal in space and local in consciousness  are 1: time is 3 dimensional and 2: consciousness is local at any position in the universe ie. thought moves instantly between any two (or more) conscious beings at any two (or more) places in the universe. In the field time is 3 dimensional which limits our range of observation, for example waves are detected only as they pass single points/areas in the field or in Quantum Entanglement where the observed event only reflects one possible viewpoint of many, the results observed reflect the events happening within the time bandwidth which is focused on. Other events happening in different dimensions of time go undetected. Quantum mechanics is often described as being counter intuitive but it is not, the mistake is thinking that the probabilistic nature refers to the particle, ie. that a particle exists in many different states and places at the same time  only becoming a certain particle when it is measured which is clearly nonsense. It is identifying the wave that is probabilistic. The wave is certain and consistent every time but the probability that we can detect a wave crest at a specific point/field particle is dependent on where we look and at what time we look there."
 

 
ABSTRACT

This paper asserts that the space time fabric/dark matter and the Higgs Field are all one. A gigantic spherical 3 dimensional lattice of hollow spheres connected by hollow expandable pipes through which a medium or ether flows, this lattice exists within a void, a true vacuum, which has no known boundaries. Waves move through the ether detected at points as photons in various energies. All matter is where these light waves have hit angles and segments get stuck as they create vortexes within field particles, the momentum of the spinning vortexes twisting the field particles. This causes the connecting pipes and field particles to be pulled in creating mass and other waves of photons then bounce off these rotating field particles rather than move through them The three forces of electromagnetism, the weak and strong nuclear forces all pertain to what happens within the fabric and it's ether. Gravity describes the effect these disturbances have on the field. With large massive objects like planets, suns and black holes the vortexes create negative pressure and the fabric is pulled in and clumped together, similar to elastic wool around a spool. The expansion of the universe is the stretch in the fabric being pulled into these clumps, the field pulls in all directions so the fabric must stretch. Other passing objects are then pulled in also as their path through the fabric is distorted and bent.  At certain close distances particles are drawn directly to the large massive object because the angles in their orbital paths merge with direct paths and so they veer off an orbital path to where intersecting angles are least and naturally move on a direct path to the point of least resistance, usually on the large celestial objects surface and remain there. Time has been viewed as one dimensional because like space we can only take one measurement at a time (and combine it with previous data in an awareness that space is 3 dimensional) but time is in fact also three dimensional and the evidence is clear in the interference pattern in the double slit experiment. Like matter moving through space it always moves forward but with variations in 3 dimensions. Matter and time have an inverse relationship because in order to increase our focus on matter to study and quantify specific activity we must take focus away from all other vibrations happening nearby so we decrease our range of time, so we get a limited view of all that happens in reality. When we increase our range of 3 dimensional time we lose our ability to measure objects as there are more vibrations happening creating a vibrational "cloud" which makes quantifying specific activity impossible. When we try to increase that focus on matter like detecting for which way in the double slit experiment we must narrow the range of time towards one dimension.

Expanded abstract.
  
 SPRING TIME THEORY.
A Unified Field Theory that shows the space time fabric is composed of a lattice of balls which I will call RIKs [69] connected by spring/elastic type strands which I will call TREDDs [69(Named after two (of the many) comedians who helped keep my spirits up and make it through life long enough to make this paper possible, whose work can be seen here and referred back to for relief if anyone gets a sore head while reading this scientific paper. https://youtu.be/Hzf1_6ROslI Some may be finding the mind expansion uncomfortable, seriously, it overturns many assumptions previously believed to be facts and rewrites certain laws of nature, some in the big bang camp clearly are unsettled already. Some reacting with destructive/negative knee jerk reactions and censorship  having me blocked from social media and my very visual video work on youtube deleted/destroyed,before fully checking the facts, which have held back this breakthrough, very unhelpful for science, as I will explain later.) 

A gas/liquid/fluid type medium or ether [3] exists and permeates all space inside the RIKs and TREDDs. Energy moves  through the ether in waves creating matter and along the TREDDs as ripples creating vibrations detected as neutrinos/axions and gravitational waves. These TREDDs can expand when vibration/energy becomes entangled/clumped leading to the RIKs being pulled together and their connecting TREDDs being expanded which forms curvature, time and matter (time and matter being directly relational, with that being an inverse relationship in 3 dimensions). Curvature in areas surrounding compacted groups of RIKs due to RIKs being pulled in at unequal tensions, where once there were corners they are bent eventually becoming perfectly curved at critical distances. These becoming effective when the expansion starts. Because the waves of energy are moving through the field so fast (up to thousands of km per second) it gives the illusion that because these are observable as their force causes oscillations outlining the shape of the quantum particle field it appears like matter is made of particles. It is and we are in fact made of energy moving through the lattice of RIKs and TREDDs which become visible as excitations.
 


 INTRODUCTION
Spring Time Theory is proposing that Spacetime [4] The Higgs field [5] and dark matter [6] are in fact all the same thing. There is one field which is composed of a lattice of quantum particles “RIKs” joined together by stretchable coiled springs/elastic type strands “TREDDs” Each RIK is connected to 26 other RIKS via 13 strands of TREDDs that run through each point in spacetime like seen in the image at the top of the page. 27 RIKs connected altogether at every point in the field.  (After extensive research it is my understanding that these 27 RIKs are the same as the axion particles predicted by Quinn and Peccei in 1977 [66]. However I am hesitant to use the term axion for two reasons, firstly because electrons, neutrinos/, gluons are also the same single particle in different states of energy and oscillation (mass), so using the term axion is positive as it makes that link to dark matter and the field but on the other hand not quite describing the field particles in all states like at rest because these axions have mass. So it may make it slightly incorrect to use the term axion as it explains the field particles with mass which they don't have at other states of zero or close to zero energy like in "outer space".  So I will continue with the new name RIKs .)
All observations of different particles of the standard model are a result of different groups of waves and combinations of vibrations passing through these RIKs of the field which become visible as excitations. Usually light passes forward through the field but once a loop is created the external light then bounces off and we see or detect matter.  The proposed graviton does not exist. Gravity [7] is a mechanism of the field where RIKs as matter are pulled together and move to where the distance between TREDDs is shortest these being where waves of energy are gathered together as mass/wobble pulling the RIKs and TREDDs of spacetime in. The resulting stretch forcing matter to follow the path of least resistance demonstrated in this short video https://youtu.be/GVVVbqlQQbc in which the free moving metal ring represents an electron orbital [8] the smaller ring represents a massive body with significant gravitational pull pulling in the strands of spacetime, the elastic represents the strands in the spacetime fabric.

Here is an analogy which should make the new paradigm easy to understand. If we are on a big boat say a ferry or ocean cruiser and we are docked waiting to move off so we look out at the ocean. The boat rocking gently sends us to sleep and we wake up a while later, if we look out the window we may see lots of other big boats pass us so we wave at the people on the boat to welcome them thinking they must be coming to shore then however we take a walk on deck we see we are in the middle of the ocean and the other boats weren't moving they had put down anchors, we had set sail hours ago and we had woken and sailed past them thinking we were still docked and they were moving, it is a common optical illusion experienced on boats. Until now we didn't realise the particles were stationary and what we see is waves of energy moving through them shaking them. Normally we don't see these RIKs as light passes straight through them without shaking or twisting them. But with high energies the light causes the RIKs to start to vibrate and we see them. As the waves move shaking the RIKs the wave can be seen as every RIK passed will shake. Just like if we get two people to hold a blanket and one person shakes it it will send a ripple which we can see travel along the blanket. These waves are what scientists have been viewing as particles. However in matter the particles don't travel just like the particles in the fabric of the blanket don't travel, it's the wave that travels.  We are made of collections of waves of energy and all standard model particles  are waves of energy moving through the field. What has baffled scientists for 100 years is that it appears like they are individual particles but that is only because they have been viewed in one dimensional time while actually time is 3 dimensional. 
It's a bit like the flat Earth round Earth problem. Initially mankind thought the world stays still and the stars and sun moved around us. Then with great philosophers like Aristarchus we discovered the world is moving and moving around the sun, it was an optical illusion. Even though Aristarchus proved it and other Greek mathematicians proved the world was round about 500 years BC most people thought the idea was just ridiculous, they had a mental block, perhaps the thought of spinning through space scared them so they didn't look at the evidence, so the science was largely  ignored, the literature did not get widely printed so it didn't spread for 2,000 years until the concept resurfaced and was reasserted by medieval age scientists and eventually after a lot of pain and resistance with people getting first laughed at and mocked then later imprisoned and tortured by medieval scientists, it was finally accepted. Now most intelligent trustworthy people able to think logically and clearly who look at all the evidence can recognise when people and evidence are/is trustworthy can see the overwhelming weight of evidence shows it is round and the Earth revolves around the sun which revolves around Sag-A our galaxy's central massive black hole. Now on the quantum level where we observe the tiny visible shapes called particles that make up everything using microscopes and now computers I have discovered/realised that it is not the particles that are moving it is waves of energy moving through the field particles, again it is another optical illusion. This time scientists have been having a hard time understanding it because it appears to be single particles. The new discovery is that time is 3 dimensional so these waves are rippling out in every direction but we only detect those which we focus on and until now scientists have only been focusing on one time dimension. It is perhaps an unsettling thought or a deep rooted fear for any scientist of any era when they feel  challenged. If something at first glance seems impossible then looking at the evidence unsettles them and/or makes a lot of their work seem insignificant and in hindsight, full of mistakes they simply won't look also perhaps because so much of what they believe seems so convincing and so many other contemporary intellectuals believe the same it is maybe difficult to accept so many people could be so wrong and one relatively  uneducated person can be right. . The reality is there is no need to worry in fact it's a very exciting discovery and everyone makes mistakes.  It seems also that because science has become so involved with politics and money researchers fight viciously against any perceived threat to their funding sources, with the vast majority of funding going on research to find evidence supporting the big bang/outwards expanding universe this is a tragedy for scientific curiosity and open discussion. “To raise new questions, new possibilities, to regard old problems from a new angle, requires creative imagination and marks real advance in science.” – Albert Einstein

 THE MATHEMATICAL MODEL WITH THE CONFIRMATION OF THE LOCATION OF THE MAGNETIC MONOPOLES
UNDERSTANDING ENERGY AND MASS

t³∝1/m³
Lucy's Law
because as can clearly be seen in the video evidence of the double slit experiment time and matter have an inverse relationship. An electron acting in time like a particle leaves a mark in matter like a wave, when it acts in time like a wave it leaves a mark in matter like a particle.

ENERGY
c=tdp 
c³=t³V.p+0-
e=c³
Here is why.

The dynamics of the universe can be broken down into 4 different entities 
Space measured as distance in 3 dimensions x y z
Time measured in the physical realm by intervals, seconds, which are fixed to one dimension of space for measurement but which cannot truly measure time. Yet we now have equations and logic that show using mathematics that time dilates in 3 dimensions with an inverse relationship to matter. Also we can verify that time is 3 dimensional in variations of the double slit experiment.Einstein showed time is variable relevant to positions in space and it is also variable relative to consciousness in 3 dimensions physical length and quality defined by 2 values difficult to define in physical/numbers but are experimentally verifiable, so for now I will use the term wide and slim for dilatable time within the same spacially measured second. These 3 can each have positive or negative values.
Pressure: 3 dimensions positive neutral negative again these each can have positive or negative values in the conscious realm.
Energy: excess, sufficient, insufficient. With energy all 3 can have a positive or negative value.  A mid point can be fixed for physical systems but cannot be for conscious systems because it's value in consciousness is subjective. We can determine how much energy is needed to play a music at a certain decibel (insufficient energy will not produce a certain high decibel excess energy will exceed it) but it is subjective whether that volume of noise is sufficient, insufficient or excessive. 

To condense the essence of the theory we have four entities existing in the space time fabric: time, space, pressure and energy. in the quantum realm energy is a measure of the total number of impacts either by molecules in the ether or if these impacts come in great numbers they become waves which impact against the walls/skin of the spacetime fabric leading to what we detect as electricity and matter. Matter is because segments of these waves get separated from the main wave and stuck in loops/vortices. Electricity is because the waves impact and move through matter.
Energy is determined by the value of the three others  time, space, pressure. This can be represented visually by one of each at each corner of a triangle t v and p with e represented by the space in the triangle. All 3 have 3 properties time and space are both 3 dimensional while pressure can be + neutral or -. But we always measure using one dimension/property so c is measured along 1 dimension of time t, 1 dimension of space distance d and 1 value of pressure neutral. c=td and until now pressure has not been factored in because physicists assumed the pressure in a vacuum is constant but it is not. There is an ether in the space time fabric. So when light travels through the void which the space time fabric exists in it's speed is constant relative to the space within the fabric that it travels through and variable relative to the space in the void. This is because the spacetime fabric can be stretched or compacted within any fixed area of the void.

Energy (number of impacts/pushes) increases or decreases dependent on the 3 others: any increase in time and/or space and/or pressure and the energy (number of impacts) increases. Likewise any decrease in time and/or space and/or pressure and the energy decreases.
If the units of any 2 remain fixed any decrease in the other gives less energy, conversely any increase gives more energy.  
So
If time and space remain fixed any decrease in pressure gives less energy, conversely any increase in pressure gives more energy.
If pressure and space remain fixed any decrease in time gives less energy, conversely any increase in time gives more energy.
If time and pressure remain fixed any decrease in space gives less energy, conversely any increase in space gives more energy.
Energy is in essence the amount of movement in time and space dependent on the pressure marked by the number of collisions. So the speed of light is constant and any "object" travelling towards it causes an increase in pressure in the ether which slows the wave down relative to the amount of space in the void it is travelling through but equal in speed relational to the amount of space it travels through in the fabric.  
Any "object" travelling away from the wave causes a decrease in pressure in the ether speeding up the wave relative to the amount of space in the void that it is travelling through but equal in speed relational to the space it travels through in the fabric.
All have a relationship with each other. For the energy to remain constant an increase in value in 1 decreases the combined value of all the others. Adjust the angles in any ratio in the triangle and the proportions of time, space and pressure move with the others keeping the same internal energy. if we  keep the same proportions/angles but increase or decrease the size of the sides we increase or decrease the amount of energy within. 
If we increase/decrease any 2 of the 3 entities the third must increase/decrease in the opposite direct proportion to the other 2 entities overall change to maintain the same energy and vice versa. The only way we can truly increase or decrease the energy is to vary the overall length of the sides of the triangle.  Say we  increase the quantity of t we must decrease p and stay in the same volume of space to get the same energy. If p and V stay constant but we increase the amount of t we get more energy (occuring over a longer period of time). 
 
To understand this we must consider or understand that there is an ether INSIDE the space time fabric which is a lattice within a void and that energy is a measure of the frequency and momentum of collisions or pushes. Pushes either by molecules of the ether against each other or pushes of the fabric by waves of varying pressure moving through the ether.  The more pressure/momentum P in any specific volume V and/or the more volume in a specific pressure the more energy there is I.e. the more pushes occur within a fixed time. Increase any 1 of these and in order for the energy to remain constant the combined value of other 2 must decrease.  For example time is needed for the wave to travel from a to b. So the total energy or number of collisions increases by the rise in volume of a fixed pressure and it also increases with the rise of pressure within a fixed volume and in both cases with any increase in time so the speed of light is not just the distance by the time it is the distance by the time divided or multiplied by the pressure because pressure can be positive neutral or negative.  c=dtp where p is either a positive, zero or negative number. So the number of pushes (energy) is (e=d³ x p+0- x t³) we have a symbol for d³ which is V volume the value of p is defined by +, 0 or - but we have until now no value for 3 dimensions of time so here is what we could use. As time can be long or short in length it is also expressed in terms of "quality" which is usually associated with wealth in physical entities so we could use the symbol W for time in all it's dimensions or simply stay with t³. The less pressure (congestion in the ether) the faster the wave moves through a fixed volume of space in a fixed time.  Energy is created in every RIK as a wave of collisions/energy passes through. Rather than being divided between the forward exits it exits all with the same energy it enters with through one entrance  ie. energy is multiplied/propagated out from the core at the rate of 3³ that it goes in ie. the RIK is not truly a magnetic monopole but it's activity basically fulfils the same logic.physicists traditionally describe it as a "monopole" So actually the monopole is not truly a monopole although the dynamics are similar, there is input "xe" but the outgoing energy is amplified at the rate of xe³.  I describe it as "energy is created in 3 dimensional time and 3 dimensional space". That energy (number of collisions)  after exiting the RIK remains the same or decreases with the stretch in the TREDDs because while space in the void is constant everywhere the same space in the fabric becomes less when stretched moving more volume of the fabric into a specific volume of the void known as mass and leaving less volume of the fabric in the surrounding space of the void where the stretch is. . Less space means less pressure means less energy/collisions. 

So in an equation the speed of light is not just distance by time it is also by pressure. c=tdp 
when we use delta then x is in fact representative of space V because we know any point in space is 3 dimensional if we magnify enough. In pragmatic terms in quantum physics the position x is V quantized to the field particle, the RIK. So c³=t³.V.p
the speed of light is based on the values of these 3, dependant on how we want to express or define it. So regardless of how we wish to define the speed of light it remains constant within any system in the void so the amount of energy in any system or space within the void is.
e=c³


The pressure felt in time dilates in the spiritul/conscious realm not just the physical realm. As Einstein showed the measurement of time "the second" cannot truly measure time because the detected movement of the physical measuring device say the "hand" on the clock is variable relative to the observer the space between the hand and the observer, the amount of mass in the locality and now as STT reveals the pressure between time and matter. So time and space also exert pressure on each other and as we see clearly in the video evidence of the double slit experiment time and matter have an inverse relationship. 

MASS
In its most basic theoretical form mass is a description of the amount of compaction of the spacetime fabric caused by a photon Y (or photons nY) arriving at angles twisting the field intersection the "RIK" x, the total number of field particles/intersections "RIKs"within the group (standard particle) nx, the overall momentum of all these field particles interacting p by any time dilation 3t one for each dimension of time. In one electron that is one photon arriving above a certain energy and hitting above the critical angle with no internal time dilation.
In the electron.

2 PLACES WHERE 137 IS FOUND

In this sense the number 1/137 represents the critical angle a  single photon hits a RIK which causes the vortex to begin within. Detected as an electron which is the building block of most other standard model particles with larger mass. Above this critical angle of 137° and/or below the energy needed for an electron the wave passes on as a photon without creating a vortex in the ether. At this critical angle within a certain range maybe something like 137°-137.5° and specific energy the vortex is formed and the RIKs begin twisting back and forth with relatively constant energy as the vortex passes along between RIKs. With higher energy it takes a greater angle to create the vortex always keeping to this "golden ratio" 1/137 of energy to angle.   Where the energy is higher and the angle more acute, beyond the range necessary for the formation of the vortex, part of the wave creates the vortex which rotates within the RIK and as it comes back to the point of entry it deflects any remaining energy in the wave back into the field as a lower energy wave detected at points as photons.

In the equation a=e²/4π the e² represents the total energy on the surface area of the wave (perpendicular to the RIK it is hitting or leaving) defined by the pressure/momentum in the ether and the diameter of the TREDDs it is is passing through e², 4π is the total surface area of the RIK.  
I knew all along that there was a critical energy to angle ratio which leads to the formation of the vortexes of light that we know as matter. This angle 137.5° I came across in a proposed theory of Everything as energy exchange [87]articulated by a Theoretical physicist Nick(I have been unable to find his full name on his website and channel so I have emailed him and am awaiting a response) whose theory although significantly different than mine correctly has photon interaction as the basic process behind all of physical phenomena in the universe and his idea of energy exchange is to me essentially the same principle as the change of the form of energy from forward moving to looping. Nick shows in his explanations that the angle relative to the radius of the electron also is the angle that we find in the Fibonachi sequence when it is plotted in two dimensions. What I am proposing is that using Nick's explanation of the golden ratio relative to the Fibonachi sequence coupled with what I have been saying for over a year that matter like time always moves forward turns the Fibonachi model into a 3 dimensional model. It is the movement of matter forward through spacetime that gives the spiral which increases in the Fibonachi ratio. Matter is gathered and held by living souls as we move forward through spacetime. As we spiral forward we gather as much physical matter as possible which is a constant of spirituality/consciousness, that is we constantly seek to secure as much physical and conscious "information" as possible to remain within the realm of life for as long as possible. Because we are constantly spinning forward through space we are fortunate/blessed with a place in the Universe where matter is travelling at that critical speed through spacetime which allows life to exist. 

. 

m=Y.∠.x.p.t
Luckily we know the value of one single field particle excited into a state with detectable mass, the electron, so we get 
M=0.511Mev/c².nY.nx.p.3Δt
When we break down the detected energy in the electron we getM=(4/3.πc³-el Mev/c²).nY.nx.p.3Δt 
e=mc² is slightly incorrect or misleading. e in this equation is detectable energy only, it is not a description of energy as a force. 
So what is?

What is an electron volt? I would describe it as a push. The force of a light wave hitting a bend, that bend in this case being the curved surface of the RIK which pushes the RIK forward and the push is detected by an other object as it is moved by the impact. This is known as mass.So mass is the total inwards compaction of the spacetime fabric as a result of the twisting caused by the internal pushing, which pulls in the surroundings determined by how many pushes and the combined momentum of those pushes detected. As I use the time unit of a tik, the time it takes light to travel one RIK diameter we have 523800 pushes in half a tik or π/6.10^6 per half tik. 
We confirm there are 3 dimensions of space and 3 of time when we breakdown the mass of an electron working backwards to find out what might be going on.  So knowing that it was 3 dimensional time at work in the double slit experiment I applied the formula for the volume of a sphere to an electron and got 0.5238mev/c² or π/6Mev/c²  0.511+0.0128Mev/c², which is 0.5238mev/c²
4/3πr³ r being the time it takes light to pass through one RIK divided by 2, d/2 or r giving us
4/3 x 3.1428571... x 0.5³ (0.125)
0.5238 or π/6 in one quantized area of space the RIK in one defined unit of time t at neutral pressure.
 so 
e=π/6Mev/c² then when we multiply both sides by c² we have the total detected and deduced energy in one dimension of space and one of time e multipled by c² equals 
ec²= π/6Mev.nY.nx.Δp.3Δt
e logically is one dimensional representation of energy so true overall energy is one dimensional representation of energy multiplied by the other 2 dimensions so true e is e x c²
e=c³
The loss of 12800 pushes accounted for by phase shift in the TREDD oscillations cancelling each other out and no push is generated. Similar in a sense to two kids on a see saw pushing in turn up and down. Then occasionally as the energy levels fluctuate in each there are moments when one or other kid loses the concentration/rhythm and both push at the same time so the see saw comes to a sudden stop they have a quick giggle and start again immediately. As there is very insignificant time dilation it is logical to assume that the 6 touching RIKS (6 RIKs touching the RIK detected as an electron as seen at the centre of the universal 27 point structure of the field)would show very little oscillation so the majority of the oscillation would be along the 20 extended TREDDs. So 12800 moments of oscillation phase shift in each pair of TREDDs as they reach that point of energy fluctuation where both pull with equal opposite force and there is no push detected. The TREDDs whose oscillations have been building in momentum between the central RIK and the 20 extended RIKs suddenly all get jolted by the sudden stop and the impact sends a wave of energy significant enough to move connected RIKs into a very low mass neutrino  or axion state too low in energy to be detected is sent out along all 26 TREDDs. The next wave hits and the cycle begins again. One might say it is the heartbeat of the RIK. The next wave impacts immediately and the pushes continue until that phase shift happens again. 12800 times in every tick. Initially there seems no need for a complex reason to explain why 12800 times in a tick it is just the timing. The fact it suggests a correlation with binary is perhaps coincidental. Perhaps not? Lets see because it does lead to something interesting....soon explained.

So we get 523800ev or 523800 pushes in half a tik and only 511000 are detected with 12800 moments of TREDD oscillations meeting with equal opposite force cancelling out a push.
e=
c³=π/6.10^6ev/c².t.d.p
e=the total amount of energy involved in 523800 pushes of a RIK in half a tik

We could simply decide to call half a tik a click
To put it another way. 
Because light is energy moving outwards in 3 dimensional waves with no detectable confinement/resistance through the space time lattice. Mass is manifested when light travelling out from the source in one direction hits bends causing resistance and wobble in the field particles "RIKs" and their connecting threads "TREDDs". So mass is the resulting detectable compaction of field particles "RIKs" caused by light confined within curvature so we must use π to quantify that confinement. Light still travels within the RIKs in 3 dimensions but we measure the mass using light travelling in time along one axis. So we have two dimensions of light c² times one dimension of light detected as mass hence why e=mc² because m IS light travelling in one direction/along one axis converted into kinetic energy detected as mass. The rest of the energy travels with the equivalent force of 2 dimensions of light through the medium/ether which permeates all space inside the fabric. While time appears to move forward in one dimension it is in fact 3 dimensional. In principle it is similar to the fact a vehicle moving at high speed such as a car, aeroplane, rocket etc moves forward along one general dimension of space but has deviations in 3 dimensions and the engine that drives it forward is always moving inside in 3 dimensions. The energy propagates out in 3 dimensional time and the waves of energy are detectable moving through the field particles which oscillate as they are passed. This wave of oscillations moving through the RIKs combined with the limitations of detection in 3 dimensional time means we can only observe one part of the wave moving forward through the particles in the field (which become visible when they move) along one axis of time and one of space giving the illusion that it is a single particle moving forward in space and time. Similar to the illusion caused by lighting bulbs in sequence say on a billboard video screen depicting and appearing to the observer as a "particle" of light moving forward in a straight line across the screen. 
The wobble (mass) creates a stretch in the fabric in 3 dimensions which is directly proportional to the distance light has to travel through the RIKs and the connecting TREDDs  so is directly proportional to time dilation so time must also be in 3 dimensions. Time is measured in a unit I will call a tIk t which is the time it takes for light to travel one RIK diameter. So we get the equation for mass using the logic
if e=mc² then
M=(4/3.πc³-energy lost to ripples in the TREDDs (-el for energy lost)/c²)M)nY.nx.Δp.3Δt
Because
x is a field particle "RIK"
r is it's radius
It is logical to deduce that e in e=mc² is not the total energy or energy "the force" it is only the detected kinetic energy of one dimension of space and one of time multiplied by the other energy passing in the other 2 dimensions of space and time. As everything is logically nothing but energy in one form or another mass must be the detected energy only and the total energy inside an electron which is the building block of all other standard model particles is the detected kinetic energy "mass" but there is also undetected energy lost as neutrino waves passed along the connecting TREDDs.  
It is logical to assume then that the detected energy (mass) and deduced energy (neutrino waves) is  c³ as it is all the energy generated in three dimensions of space and three dimension of time in the one place in the universe where we can verify 3 dimensions of space and three dimensions of time, the electron. So c times c² is the total energy so e=c³=π/6Mev and we have 5 ways to express the equation
e=π/6Mev.nx.Δp.Δt
e=c³
c³=π/6Mev.nx.Δp.Δt.
c³=π/6.10^6ev.nx.Δp.Δt.
In it's simplest form of logic
e=the total amount of energy involved in 523800 (in posh terms a @#€&load of) pushes of a RIK in a click ...Mick..
 
Energy lost to the  energy of neutrino oscillations along the connecting TREDDs. These having 3 different lengths along the 13 strands connected at 26 points on the central Rik in the ratio of 1:1.41:1.73   6@1, 12@1.41, 8@1.73. giving each outward TREDD an oscillation of  incredibly tiny mass. These pulling against each other as the wave travels out causing greater oscillations with stretch and phase shifts with 3 different levels of energy at troughs and 3 at peaks merging at field points as low energy neutrinos/axions.
So the overall mass is the amount of energy confined in the RIK 4/3πc³ less  energy lost to the connecting TREDDs, which is .511 Mev/c² the mass of one electron which is one position  multiplied by the amount of positions nx brought together as a standard model "particle" .  nx multipied by the accumulative momentum which is p (every time a wobbling RIK is pushed against another the wobble is multiplied in 3 dimensions of space so it is to the power of three. When they don't collide but spin around a central point the momentum is added.) multiplied by the amount of photons nY  by any moments of time dilation by 3 one for each dimension of time 3Δt
M=(4/3.πc³-el Mev/c²).nY.nx.p.3Δt. It is important to remember that momentum is not always a straight forward "one or the other" calculation, sometimes it is the total amount of RIKs and/or FUBs (a FUB is the basic shape formed when RIKs become gathered in groups of 13 RIKs stuck together by an internal looping photon, detected as standard model particles, explained soon) colliding against each other multiplying momentum as in the Higgs Boson or W and Z bosons. Sometimes it is RIKs/FUBs pulling back and forth opposite each other or spinning around a central point so not all colliding against each other but adding rather than multiplying momentum as in muons and mesons. Sometimes it is a mix of both like in neutrons. 
These pushes of the wave inside the particle stretches the surrounding field inwards as the RIKs twist and vibrate with the pushes (spin is more accurately described as "twist" explained later). This is what is detected as mass. Mass IS the amount of pull inwards of the field caused by photons stuck in loops stretching the fabric of the field. The greater the range of movement the wave has between RIKs, how many times that movement is compounded and the more photons it contains the more it twists, stretches and pulls in the fabric and is therefore detected with greater mass. The total shape and compounded movement giving the mass can be deduced using the equation m=(4/3.πc³-el Mev/c²).nY.nx.p.3Δt To use the classic way to illustrate gravity with a sheet made of stretchable fabric, if we drop one snooker ball in the centre we get a dip representing mass and it's equivalent effect in gravity, with every ball added (every RIK brought into play) there is added dip and stretch.  A better way to illustrate it is actually to have an object say a fork inserted into the fabric and twisted. With every twist the fabric is pulled in more and objects stuck IN the fabric strands are moved to where the distance between strands is the shortest ie the point of least resistance which is nearer to where the twist happens.


 Calculations for almost all "particles" in the  standard model using the formula are in the paper in the "EXPLANATION OF MASS" section. 
Mick (in the sentence about the pushes of a RIK in a click!) is a fictional character that I couldn't resist creating to accentuate the rhyme in the sentence. Not all Micks, some appear to be very real like Mick Hucknall from Simply Red, though I've never touched him so I can't be fully sure, his songs are very real though and I don't remember creating him so I accept he exists in other peoples reality also therefore he probably is real. I don't think it was Mick Hucknall I was talking to in the sentence but then again I just realised he might read it in which case I am, in which case, nice tunes Mick I can associate with that one "money's too tight to mention". 

The speed of light is slightly incorrect as it has been measured in a straight line which is impossible, Einstein showed that light is affected by and gets curved by gravity and as there is no known region of space without gravity there is nowhere that light can move in a perfectly straight line so at the shortest distances it must travel in an arc while over long distances it travels in a path similar to a milipede going up and down twisting left and right as it moves forward. c is more likely to be confirmed as exactly 300,000,000ms if we can find a way to send it in a perfectly straight line or measure it along a known quantity of a specific curve of gravity at neutral pressure in the ether. The light that seemed to travel directly out to the deflection device actually travelled in an arc and went out of view and the light that came back to us had travelled out in a different part of the wave, travelled in an arc towards the reflection device, another wave was sent back and the part of the wave that was detected arriving back to base was also a different part of the wave than the part which left the reflection device pointing directly to base, it also travelled in an arc and went out of view. 
_____________________________________________
When we look at the equation for mass  we see two interesting numbers seem to pop up but in different powers of ten so a correlation is hinted at. We get 0.5238 which is pi divided by six π/6 Mev/c² as the total energy existing or generated in the RIK at any given time and we also get 12800ev if we view it in decimal we get 12800 or 2^(7) x 10^2. This attracts a comparison with binary which is the numerical system of information. So one electron volt would appear to be one bit of optical  information in binary yet if we postulate that base 10 to the power of 2 is perhaps significant then one electron volt would appear to be one bit of optical  information in binary then if we want to make that correlation to it in binary having two states a push and it's opposite simultaneous pull we divide it by 2 and 12800 becomes 25600 or 2^(8) x 10²).  So we can likely say a binary electron volt is one bit of  optical information, 1 binary electron volt 1bev/c². 1bev/c² passing through it. One binary electron volt 1bev/c² = (1ev/2)/c²  If we use this system we get the total energy moving or generated in a RIK in half a  tik as 
1047600 bev/c² x 10²
If we stay with the standard system of figures we get 0.5238Mev/c² or 
 π/6Mev/c²
as the total energy confined within one RIK if none were lost as weak neutrino or axion  waves.
.

I will give an example using the Higgs Boson which is different than normal matter in the sense that whereas normal matter as we know it which is relatively stable is usually created in nature by a single wave/photon looping inside the RIKs, others like the heavier quarks are engineered in high energy accelerators by forcing in more waves of energy. The Higgs Boson needs 3 waves to enter loops simultaneously or almost immediately one after the other to hold shape hence it has only ever been detected in high energy particle accelerators. What happens is this. The force of one wave entering at a specific angle and wavelength loops and creates negative energy in its wake (similar to a pulling undercurrent in ocean waves) which draws in all 13 RIKs into the FUB shape which wobbles, detected as mass and that wobble/mass accumulates as each subsequent wave of energy hits almost instantaneously one after another or simultaneously with each other. So each of the 3 photons entering causes a mass of 13³ 2​,197  which gives a total mass of 6591 times that of a single RIK's wobble ie. An electron. However there are also moments where each wave arrives travelling from the core of the FUB to hit a RIK head on stretching it away from the group so we have the mass of an electron moving away from the momentarily stable FUB. Meantime there are also 2 waves travelling with the FUB structure with their momentum each adding to the momentum by 1/3 the force of an electron not the full electron mass as the RIKs are now touching and the waves are moving in the FUB except not directly opposite the stretched and extended RIK because their overall directions are away from the Higgs centre (giving the brim of the "Mexican hat") which when both are compounded is 1/3². So we have 13³ x 3 x ((12 x 3) + 1 + 1/3²)= 6591 x (36+1+.111)=6591 x 37.111 = 244599 times the mass of a single electron going by the standard model [5] where an electron is 0.511 Mev/c² and a Higgs Boson is 124.97Gev/c². This is soon hit by a 4th wave of energy disrupting the loops allowing all 3 waves to escape, the shape collapses completely and the other 3 waves escape in an instant. 
As we can see from the example the energy of the 3 photons would be expected to become distributed between all the RIKs following classical mechanics. But this doesn't happen, as more energy passes more RIKs that energy is multiplied forward creating a quarter of a million times more energy than a single electron in a very short period of time using only 3 photons.

 If energy could not be created then as this energy passes out from the RIK it should become dispersed so the mass of a single RIK should decrease as more RIKs are brought into the standard model particle shape. But this doesn't happen. The mass increases in multiples of the number of RIKs brought into play multiplied and/or compounded by the momentum. So energy must be created. It is propagated in a forward direction of space and time each time a RIK is excited. If the RIK already has mass when a wave of energy hits it the energy is multiplied. 
I will put this in all capitals again as it is a very important point. 
IF ENERGY COULD NOT BE CREATED THEN AS THIS ENERGY PASSES OUT FROM THE RIK IT SHOULD BECOME DISPERSED SO THE MASS OF A SINGLE RIK SHOULD DECREASE AS MORE RIKS ARE BROUGHT INTO THE STANDARD MODEL PARTICLE SHAPE. BUT THIS DOESN'T HAPPEN. THE MASS INCREASES IN MULTIPLES OF THE NUMBER OF RIKS BROUGHT INTO PLAY MULTIPLIED AND OR COMPOUNDED BY THE MOMENTUM. SO ENERGY MUST BE CREATED

This is the magnetic monopole. The RIK, the field particle which my breakdown of the field and the mathematics of the electron and it's relationship to all other standard model particles proves energy is created in 3 dimensions of time and 3 dimensions of space.

So while energy can not be created or destroyed in one dimensional time once we get to the quantum level and understand the workings of the "engine" of the universe by confining energy within one RIK and analysing it as an electron we find time like space is three dimensional. The mathematics of mass show that with three dimensions of space and three of time energy is created at the rate of π/6Mev/c² in each RIK passed and where that momentum returns within a loop between RIKs the total momentum is the sum and/or multiples of the two colliding momentums. This is also affected by slight variations in time where the TREDDs become momentarily stretched as energy hits at angles which force RIKs to be pushed away from the central body of the standard model particle and time dilates further increasing the mass in multiples of 3 (dimensions of time) by the total mass of the object in that moment of stretch. So mass detected plus the mass lost to neutrino waves along the TREDDs give us a total energy of 0.511mev/c² +el


 because time is not truly linear it is variable in 3 dimensions when we look at the equation for mass we must factor in moments of time dilation in factors of three for each moment of dilated time (dt) one for each dimension of time  so e  must be π/6Mev/c².nY.nx.Δp.3Δt in an electron the total energy is the mass plus the energy created (but then lost) to neutrino waves, there is the number of photons nY , one position RIK, one unit of momentum  and as there is no time dilation so 3Δt becomes redundant and the number remains the same. While there is no value for 3Δt there already is time in 3 dimensions in the single RIK.
So in one time dimension
e=c³.nY.nx.Δp.3Δt


e=π/6Mev/c².nY.nx.Δp.3Δt
 because the 3 dimensions of time are only experienced in moments of time dilation so it is a multiple of three not the power of three. In 3 dimensions of time then this would be.
e=(π/6Mev/c².nx.Δp.nY.3Δt)³
The rest of the energy moves out in all directions usually undetected in one dimensional time, when we try to detect it using the which way method in the double slit experiment it becomes confined to a path of one dimension of time and one of space within the defined area of focus. However the extra created energy is revealed by the interference pattern left on the back screen when we don't try to focus on one dimension of time. We see marks which show that energy spreads out in all directions but our range of focus on time and space covers a wider space and range of time so the paths detected are more dispersed.
While we can't physically measure the total energy in one dimension of time  we already see that the mathematics of mass shows energy is not dispersed but created so time logically is three dimensional and we can further verify that time is 3 dimensional using the 3 simple ways of running the experiments and analysing them as I describe in the double slit experiment page. Then we can logically accept that the value is real. Even if we can't measure it with technology the interference pattern already shows the evidence. Energy is created in 3 dimensions of space and 3 of time but it can only be detected travelling through one dimension of space and one of time where it cannot be created or destroyed. While we experience energy in 3 dimensions of space and time we can only measure it in space between 2 points along one dimension/direction and put these all together in time between points/moments along one dimension/duration. While we measure 3 dimensions of space and 3 of time in the mass of a single electron it is detected as moments of inward outward linear impacts similar to a ball tied to a paddle by elastic and each rebound is an impact these all added together make up the total mass wobbling back and forth in between sets of two points in a tik³. So even here both space and time are measured along one dimension and the sum total is the total energy detected. We always knew there were three dimensions of space we just didn't realise there were 3 different dimensions of time....until now. So if there was a period when the Universe/field was still and without energy or all the energy was contained in one RIK perhaps  all it took was just over one tick of time in one RIK and the Universe/field began multiplying, expanding  and growing exponentially. 
. 
While matter takes up only a tiny percentage of the total volume of space in the universe mass is the total amount of the compaction of the fabric due to the twist inwards. Theoretically the mismatch in the ratio of mass to optical  information in the electron and the universe is perhaps representative of the total mass possible given time. When the universe itself reaches that amount of compaction all the matter will perhaps impact on itself, explode or pulsate outwards releasing all the trapped light again.  At first glance this could seem to account for "inflation" but in fact that too, like the expanding universe model, would be too fast of a jump to a conclusion which doesn't actually seem to bear up to the dynamics of the field when one looks further.  The spherical Universe is logically the only shape the universe is, while the flat and saddle shaped universes are hypothesised in mathematical models they hold no place in common sense/logic, these have too may open ends and don't hold up to known logic. All systems within the universe from RIKS to planets to black holes are all spherical, logic tells us the universe is the same and STT further backs this up later in the paper. 
These subset of notes and equations CC copyrighted and added 11.17am central European time April 27 2020
". 
-------------------------------------------------------- 

This is not meant as a definitive explanation for the binary  numbers it is merely showing the numbers appear when we analyse the electron for the numbers. Why pi which is representative of the predominant defining shape in the universe the figure six seeming to embody 2 energies and three inseparable/interwoven dimensions of spacetime or one energy and two entities each having 3 dimensions, time and space, then ten to the power of 6 with a sub number pointing to binary are all there is a huge question. It may take a lot more research and philosophising to come to a more accurate conclusion my intent is to show that they are there and the chances of them happening by coincidence seem to me to be phenomenally slim. “Coincidence is God’s way of remaining anonymous.” – Albert Einstein

As most physicists and mathematicians probably know base 10 is not only a great base for calculations it is also the base of one of the strongest uniform shape in nature after the sphere. Base 4 being another then base 10 and base 5 being the smallest unit representing the 6 sided diamond shape with 3 layers of spheres touching in the ratio of 1:3:1. Base 4 and 10 the first and second bases of the 4 sided triangular pyramid. 5 being the base of the basic 6 sided diamond shape all 3 bases having all spheres touching all connecting spheres. Base 4 having 3 spheres on each side with all near surfaces touching  (like the tau), base 10 having 6 spheres on each side, all touching, with 2 layers of 1 sphere on top of 3 spheres when viewed from any of the 4 corners in base 4 and 3 layers of spheres with 1, 3 and 6 spheres sitting on top of one another when viewed from any of the 4 corners in base 10. The outer layer of the spacetime fabric or the skin must be phenomenally strong (having properties perhaps related to base 4, 5 or 10) and at the same time flexible, base 5 and base 10 are all in the equation for e. Initially I am thinking, logically the skin likely has a structure similar to the 27 point universal structure of the field with field particles and connecting strands. We can make base 4, base 5 and base 10 within the 27 point field structure. NOTE: if any mathematician is keeping a keen eye and wants to help me out even at this late stage, please do, if anyone comes up with definitive numbers backed by clear logic please please continue working and developing the theory, for anyone who performs the experiment variations on the double slit experiment please email me using the term dsevresults, I live in the hope I might finally get a good nights sleep and we can then get onto the really exciting stuff...the implications. NOTE added 00:12 14th May 2020 central European time. 

While physicists perhaps believe they measure in 3 dimensions of space and one of time in reality they don't. They always measure between 2 points in one dimension of space and one of time then quantify this further between this value and another point...and on it goes, always in one dimension of space and one of time. However because they know space is 3 dimensional they deduce the final quantities using the numbers that are found between two points and correlate all measurements of these into 3 dimensions of space and one of time using a logical awareness hence why energy cannot seem be created or destroyed in one dimension of time. The fact that the double slit experiment shows that time is 3 dimensional and the fact that c² is two dimensions of space and time means c³ must be 3 dimensions of space and 3 of time and that energy is created in this paradigm. All we need to do is to use the same logic used with an awareness of 3 dimensional space and apply it to 3 dimensions of time. It's not hard to do once we can get our heads around it, like it wasn't hard for mankind to understand the world is round and revolves around the sun once everyone stopped to think about it and looked at the evidence. The world then experienced exponential growth in almost every area, education, health, science, technology etc. It seems it is time to once again move into a new era of exponential growth in consciousness with the new realisation that time is 3 dimensional.
_____________________________
So once we understand that energy is vibrations transferring the force we realise the statement "energy cannot be created or destroyed" is untrue, energy must be created. Ripples or waves must be created. Perhaps they cannot be destroyed once created and perhaps we have failed to quantify the energy created by the force of creation which we use in music, art, stories, romance but whatever limitations we have in measuring it the logic seems indisputable. Something creates waves/ripples, a force acting on a medium. _So even though we have a mathematical model that shows energy is created in 3D time it still doesn't answer the deepest question. What is the force? Energy is still a manifestation of the movement created by the force it is not the force itself. Spring Time Theory shows that there is consciousness and the double slit experiment demonstrates the Universe is conscious. So in order to answer the question what is the force we must look deeper into the logic outside the quantifiable. We must go where mathematics and physical science can't. We go to the philosophy/science of metaphysics.

THE PHILOSOPHICAL/METAPHYSICAL MODEL.
Realising that energy is only a measurement of the amount of movement created by the force I realised we must delve deeper to understand this force. In the physical realm it is light but even still light is not the force, light is a manifestation of the force. Being already aware that the universe has consciousness like we all do, everyone reading or listening to this has consciousness. So I must try to imagine what it must be like for the universe to experience consciousness. If it were a single entity a singular force originating from a singularity what might it be? Initially I can find none, a singularity makes no sense, everything in nature has duality, light/dark, hot/cold, male/female, life death etc. So there must be a duality. So whatever the force is it must come from a duality. We see that the RIKs and TREDDs have a duality, the only singularity seems to be consciousness. The source of consciousness, the soul, "I" seems to be eternal and ageless. We seem to feel the same when we are alone and still in the dark in our bodies as adults as we did when we were kids. Our bodies change and our awareness of life, abilities, facts, wants change but at the very source the soul seems to feel the same, it certainly does to me. When I meet old friends from school most appear to have the same spirit/souls as they did when they were kids but their bodies have changed. Some seem to have become more disconnected than others but even still it seems like the same spirit except perhaps confused or with more fear and/or pain than they had as kids, others the opposite, the same spirit but more joyous and confident. It seems universal consciousness is a popular, widespread philosophy, In Hindu culture the Greeting is Namaste which I am told means "the God in me greets the God in you" in the old testament books of psalms 82:6 and Isaiah 41:23 it says "ye are Gods" in the gospel of John 10:34 it is written Jesus refers to these. Rastafarians say I and I to mean me and everyone else, it is a philosophy that many wise parents teach to their children, treat others the way you would like to be treated. Muslims say "Islam aleikum." As-salāmu alaykum, which means peace be upon you. Again a statement from a universal consciousness, the God within. If God were a separate entity one might say "I wish for peace to be upon you" or "I wish that God grant you peace" or something similar. But it is a command and who but God can command a state of being to be on another. Peace is synonymous with love, just as war is synonymous with hate and this greeting in essence is a command for the creation of love in another, or for the love that is within oneself to be transferred/multiplied to another. The act of a God. Again reflective of a universal consciousness. Although the theistic religions of Judaism, Christianity and Islam profess an external God as an overlord to which one must be subservient to. The deeper teachings and practices reinforce and demonstrate the opposite, a God that is within everyone. Perhaps the apparent contradiction demonstrating that God is when one is in tune with the laws and force of nature/the universe. When we are not in tune or understanding the laws of the universe, when we seem lost, we should look outside ourselves to where we see love in others (other Gods) to connect us back to the source.  Hence to empower one another with the force which is . . . Love.  All indications of a relationship with a universal consciousness.  Perhaps in a desperate struggle to survive amidst the violence of wars and confusion as mankind developed civilisations the Universe manifested truth in the minds of gifted highly sensitive visionaries/prophets. Perhaps often in a tone of anger when the civilisation responded to intimidation rather than reason like a parent might do to a very young child who is continually ignoring reason, disobeying and behaving in a manner that could harm him/her. So the parent shows "tough love". I'm not saying that religious books are the word of God by any means the information in all of them is clearly incorrect (evolution for example is almost certainly correct), I am saying that these visionaries perhaps had communication from the universe, visions that held clues to help advancement, perhaps like modern day big bang/expanding universe physicists and like even the best language interpreters often do they simply misinterpreted some of the data at times. Like all interpreters or scientists their interpretation of data is limited by their beliefs and world knowledge reference frame.  
Then as I tried to imagine how the universe might experience consciousness. I remembered sleep paralysis. As a child and sometimes though rarely as an adult I experienced sleep paralysis. I would wake up, be aware but unable to move my body. I sometimes thought I was dead, I could sense no pulse or heart beat, perhaps I was "clinically dead"'. So perhaps this is how consciousness feels in isolation and the universe is no different, it craves connection. When in this state I felt no pain. So objectively there should be no reason to find it uncomfortable or frightening but it was. Extremely, intensely frightening and I thought why? It wasn't a fear of death as such I had no negative view of death, death can be a tempting release from the pain of life when it becomes overwhelming. I realised it was something else it was separation from love, separation from those who loved me and who I loved. So while consciousness is the awareness of the I love is the force. It is love which motivates connection. It is love which gives everything meaning even death. If there were no such force as love we wouldn't miss our loved ones we wouldn't grieve. It is a disconnect from love. I realised love is the driving force behind everything even when it seems not to be.This force to love and be loved to stay connected, motivated me to move, with concentrated focus or willpower I eventually focused on that force of love and first a finger moved then another then eventually I was able to sit up in the bed. Willpower is an expression of focus over time to move but the force that creates that movement is love. It is the force of love that causes the push and pull that creates waves in the ether. The push of the want to be connected to others the pull perhaps back to the source of the force I. This constant push pull sending ripples through every place and every living soul in the universe, the universe itself a sum of all the souls in it like our bodies are the sum of all the cells within us. Perhaps there is a multiverse with many universes experiencing each other also. Perhaps if there was a singularity the universe imagined a duality and in order not to be alone created living consciousness in small units, living beings. Similar to how we might write stories to provide/create joy and company for ourselves and fun to others. We may imagine others reading them, even if they never will the concept of love envisaged by others reading them makes it worthwhile, we feel love as we write. We play with toys animating them when we are children. Kids kiss and hug dolls and teddy bears, it is simple beautiful fun for kids to feel and adults to watch. It is no trivial thing to say love can move mountains. Love can be manifest and personified in people, Ghandi, Martin Luther King, Mandela, Mathaii Watangari, Geldof, Bob Marley,  Arafat, Peres and Rabin, Superman and spongebob,
all motivated and became symbols of love, all have their ctitics but it's easy to criticise, if one wants to one can find negative in anything and they never fully achieved their aim, but still a failure to achieve everything they saw as possible is no failure they pushed the boundaries of love to phenomenal levels and inspired countless others to do the same. They always faced doubters who didn't see the potential in love. Their influence and achievements are immense though and still endure far beyond what any physical measurement could attempt to quantify using numbers. Those who understand love don't need numbers to understand the effect the force of their love had/has. They generate love. Even in the universe if consciousness is universal which it seems to be the universe craves love, generates love. We measure it as light quantified by volts. That is still a measurement of the amount of movement created by love. Just as we seek connection when alone, we have pets, we read, write, play games, music, imagine conversations we might have. All ways to manifest a connection, where there is none we imagine scenarios where there is some and focus with hope that it will manifest. The physics of Spring Time Theory shows that energy follows focus, the focused force of love creates movement. A song written with love can motivate a whole planet. Create ripples and vibrations all over it (https://youtu.be/9bZkp7q19f0 https://youtu.be/ZbZSe6N_BXs https://youtu.be/CvBfHwUxHIk) Often all originating in the mind of one person and its effects last beyond what is even recognised. Shakespeare still communicates and fosters love hundreds of years after he is dead. As do many artists, love transcends even death it moves in a different dimension of reality and time but it also permeates every moment of the present physical world. Love doesn't go away when someone dies. If there were no force we call love we would just simply get on with things, we have to anyway but that disconnect from the love is extremely painful. If souls didn't generate love we would not feel disconnected from it. As the mathematics of the electron show time is three dimensional and energy is created in 3 dimensional time but again this is just a measurement of the movement created by love. Love generates love, movement, dance, music, travel, all generated by the will to feel a deeper connection with love. When we are shown love we seem able to show love easier. Love generates love and this is manifest in the electron as movement/mass. Even if isolation in nature and deep meditation may seem to be exercises in disconnect they are ultimately with a vision to increase that connection to love. A connection with nature, to meditate and realise a truth. Truth seems to be inextricably linked to love. We love things that make us feel connected. When we are sure of something there is comfort, we feel more love. It is every bit as logical to accept that the universe feels the same, it wants to feel love. Love is what gives meaning to everything. Without it life itself is meaningless even unbearable. It is the force that creates and sustains life. Time is also linked to love with an inverse relationship. If with a sweetheart or at a party or on holiday a day, week or more can seem to go by super fast. Yet if we are separated from a loved one and we can't get them on the phone a minute can seem like an hour. Time dilates. It is an effect of different dimensions outside the physical but it creates movement in the physical also. 
Physical pain is also disconnect. A broken bone a cut into the flesh by a knife. Separation is painful it is a signal from our cells to our brains that there is disconnect. We seek to be together with people. We hurt when we are disconnected. Sometimes of course we seek disconnect from those who make us feel unloved or push our love. Even violence can be a manifestation of love. To protect loved ones ultimately though civilisation has shown time and time again that love, communication is much more powerful for resolving conflict. Seen used with phenomenal effect post apartheid and war in places like Rwanda, Northern Ireland and the former Yugoslavia, almost unspeakable pain and suffering, bitterness and hatred overcome by love. Simply by believing in love and the courage to exercise that force what seemed impossible became infectious and generated more love, joy and hope. Anti love emotions are natural, hate, bitterness, jealousy are powerful but the force of love overcomes them all, these negative emotions foster more disconnect and are counterproductive. They cause stagnation, separation,inaction. So when we have the measure of an electron volt it is a real measurement of the amount of movement created in the physical realm by the force we call love. While some may argue things like hatred, violence are also forces they too are motivated by love, a perverted less intelligent understanding of the power of love and expressed in a confused way but still the primal force is love. One might seek revenge to avenge the love lost when someone is killed but it is futile, it cannot bring back the love, it causes more disconnect and pain in the avenger. A male may exhibit violence to other males in front of a female to demonstrate how he would protect her but she is likely ultimately scared he would use the same violence on her and the disconnect is present. Some may use violence in war to "protect" a nation but war kills a nation's own children predominantly very young boys/men and creates more enemies, an expression of love but a short sighted unintelligent one. If nation leaders had a bit more insight and courage to sit down and talk face to face BEFORE they went to war many lives could be saved and wars averted. If a mathematician, physicist or any other physically focused person wants to say this is convoluted nonsense I would say two things. Firstly the maths show energy is created and energy is only a measurement of the movement created by the force. As truth seems inextricably linked with love most scientists "love" their field because it provides certainties, connections. Many scientists profess an interest in advancing mankind, that is an expression of the force of love. Ultimately only one thing holds us from understanding and grasping the power of love and its pervasiveness in the universe, that is doubt. It is however the easiest thing in the world to create doubt but it is short lived. To paraphrase Dr Michael Gregor from nutritionfacts.org "we can show ten thousand scientific studies that show that foods from animals are the single biggest leading cause of all the biggest killer diseases. Those with a vested interest in the animal for foods industries don't have to come up with ten thousand counter studies to keep the public fooled, they just need to create doubt." Using lies, rigging experiments or misrepresenting the findings. However the truth is infectious and built on solid indestructible foundations like castles made of granite and concrete, people by and large are not stupid. People instinctively recognise and are drawn towards love, while liars can create doubt and immense pain it is a power built on weak foundations like castles made of sand and the more the deception escalates the harder it falls. The temptation for short lived gains/safety by deception is a foolish short lived power, truth and love endure. Doubt and deception do not only create pain and separation in those fooled it creates pain and separation in the liar but unlike those fooled who know instinctively that something is wrong and have a hope of figuring out the truth, the liars are blinded by themselves and enter the abyss of pain. Unable to see the source of pain is themselves they end up the greater victim to themselves and blind to the power of love. The more they try to hide the truth the more pain they inflict on themselves. They end up blind to truth and lie to themselves, their inner generated voice telling them they are clever and have outsmarted others. So they continue in pain never facing the truth/pain hence no way out of pain and into the truth.  With the phenomenal level of violence and murder on a scale never experienced before the first world war and continued with the second world war and numerous bloody wars since, with the devastating effects of war manifest in social pressure, refugee migration, incredible poverty that have had an impact on every nation  it is not surprising so many people have stopped believing in love and are not feeling the power of love.
The incredible inefficiency of excessive violence driven by an extreme paranoia of problems and people with different views perceived as enemies best tackled in other ways probably explained best in this short 2 minute you tube clip of a 1980's bbc documentary https://youtu.be/BHBbJAIcnBI
When we are blind to the force of love we are blind to many things, the figure c² in the equation e=mc² screamed out there are two dimensions of time so the logic was simple, if space has 3 dimensions so must time. So it took 100 years for someone to believe wholeheartedly in love and so give up every physical possession, security and comfort to think clearly and recognise it in an instant. It is so obvious future generations may wonder how could they not see time is 3 dimensional? it is obvious. It is love that creates all molecules, everything in nature, physical and biological. It is in love that truth exists and truth is revealed by love and vice versa.
If this still does not convince a physicist or mathematician that love is the force I would then ask them the question. If love is not the force what is? To anyone who says that love is not a physical force I would say it most definitely is you obviously just don't feel it. I feel it in the form of intense but subtle tiny vibrations (many pop songs express a similar association with love and vibrations (https://youtu.be/apBWI6xrbLY  https://youtu.be/apBWI6xrbLY  https://youtu.be/ws6zCW6zXAM) Think about it, it is difficult to imagine many adults who have not had experiences like heart palpitations, nervous shakes or the inability to speak when overwhelmed by the effort of trying to contain the vibrations of excitement one feels when another arouses the force of love within us. It is VERY much a physical force.  When one meditates or engages in other mind expanding practices one can feel that vibration come from plants also. A response to vibration perhaps so unused in those who rely very much on sight, explaining perhaps why Stevie Wonder's masterpiece The Secret Life of Plants seems to capture that force so beautifully [85] https://youtu.be/9J3_psP5oe0

So when we say to someone "I love you" we are saying things like: I feel a connection with you, I value the connection we have, I want to strengthen and protect the connection we have, you are someone I want in my reality and when we love someone we take action to increase our connection, in the physical realm and  in consciousness, to make their presence in our reality more permanent and real. Again the paradox is that giving someone freedom to go further away in space and time, protecting their freedom to follow their own chosen path in the knowledge you remain an ally and willing to assist them find their potential actually brings you closer in mutual consciousness and love. Summed up perhaps by the old saying "Absence makes the heart grow fonder." So acts of love are actions which create movements/ripples which increase the loved ones permanence in our reality. Our perception of how loving a person is, is based on subjective views of how far that persons actions go to connect people, whether that "love field" extends only to oneself, those nearest or the entire world? It is very often in the context of love,  where the old saying "actions speak louder than words" becomes most evident.

(Note I do not claim to know everything about love, I have much to learn about love, I feel it but I struggle every day to understand it and to live up to the standards of kindness and giving of myself to others that I think I should. I am merely talking about the primal force driving creation which causes the movement.) 

.  

.The following Note added 1st July 2020 with an explanation of an historical event which comes from the mathematics showing energy is created:
 The fact that we see energy is created in 3 dimensional time gives a plausible scientific explanation for why the legendary Jesus was able to multiply the loaves and fishes and feed 5,000 people. The vibrations that the fish and bread were composed of would have been spreading out in 3 dimensions of time and space but usually undetected. If he was able to hold back the space time fabric perhaps using chi those vibrations which we now know exist could theoretically have been gathered and held in our reality. It is not just a wild idea it is perfectly plausible and in fact makes more sense than the big bang theory. Why? Because the mathematics make sense and we need no other imaginary sci fi miracles or imaginary tweaks like inflation or a singular particle exploding in a big bang (which don't work within the known laws of physics) to make it work (current big bang physicists routinely decide not to mention that the big bang theory violates the laws of Relativity and Quantum mechanics the 2 most robust scientific theories there are. One popular way around these awkward facts is to say that it happened "before the known laws of physics were created"  without giving an explanation for how the current laws of physics were created and what laws preceded them.  ). The theory of multiplying matter like loaves and fish is very possible given the mathematics without extra tweaks. We can see from the mathematics and the interference pattern in the double slit experiment that these vibrations exist. The only mystery is how did he keep and hold ie manifest these vibrations which would have usually been spreading out in time in our one dimensional time reality?  Essentially this is what is actually what is happening in teleportation as explained in the section on teleportation.Perhaps he will actually return as promised and explain. Seeing that the logic shows that we are souls holding matter together within the field it is logical to assume his soul never died and he can re enter the current realm of life and explain everything or resurface if he never left. Perhaps like is promised he will teach us how to live so we don't grow old and weak, ie. Lead us all to  everlasting life. A pleasant and now a very real scientific possibility given the reality of the field and the mathematics.


OVERVIEW OF THE STANDARD MODEL OF PARTICLE PHYSICS.
 A short video using pictures to give a very short visual guide to the general mechanics of the standard model particles is available here. https://vimeo.com/439465079
The first thing to address in the standard model [4] is that it is the ether [3] moving through the field [9] in waves detected at points and termed photons that is the elementary force carrier that directly creates ALL others in the model as internal looping waves, apart from neutrinos/axions which are also  created indirectly due to ripples.  In reality all massive particles in the standard model of particle physics (except the neutrinos) are not separate particles as such. They are each a collection of RIKs acting as  electrons/positrons clumped together by a vacuum type effect created by the negative energy of waves (photons) moving internally in the field particles "RIKs" pulling them together. Each atom has a specific number of electrons and positrons and they are bound in different ways leading to different shapes, momentum, stability, charge, spin etc. In the case of the gluon it is a single RIK acting as a bridge allowing a wave to move between groups of bound electrons and positrons. In the visual representation of the model we usually see the Higgs boson outside the blocks  on its own or in the centre of a circle. This makes sense because even though it is detected as having a Mexican hat shape this is only the shape it appears after full momentum and time dilation, its basic shape before   stretch/time dilation  into the hat shape is one RIK surrounded by 12 others (explained later in the paper). The photon is the energy wave below a certain energy and/or hitting bends at critical angles as they pass through the field wich causes no jolt/twist/mass detected at locations as a single unit. In reality it is only ever one point in a 3 dimensional wave. As waves of energy pass through the RIKs in the field above a certain energy they hit bends causing the RIKs to wobble/vibrate creating what we detect as mass. The waves of energy move through the internal paths and where the angle changes they can get stuck in internal loops. The momentum and path for these waves of energy and the negative energy they create in their wake can lead to these loops pulling connecting RIKs together and becoming stuck to a point in another's surface as a photon is transferred from one RIK to another.  Essentially protons and neutrons are similar to covalent bonding at the quantum particle level. I will address covalent bonding at the quark and orbital level soon. I must first get the image of the Higgs with a moustache and a cheeky smile that perhaps lurks under the Mexican hat out of my mind and stay focused. 

I will first address the Higgs Boson and why it's shape is fundamental. Its shape before  stretch/time dilation  is twelve RIKs pulled in tight around one central RIK like the shape made famous by the kissing ball debate between Newton and Gregor[10] All other particles are formed from this basic shape which I will call a Fundamental Unifying Block or FUB for short. Each RIK in the field is connected to 26 others at every point in the field 7 RIKs touching surfaces by their connecting springs “TREDDs” being wound in tight, the other 20 connected by stretched TREDDs. When waves of energy are diverted by differing angles they rebound off bends within the RIKs and the subsequent wobble draws that RIK closer to touch another, passing the wave along. This happening so fast that in an instant the wave has created negative energy in its wake and drawn a number of RIKs together in groups or clumps. In the basic shape of a FUB there is one central RIK and 12 others are brought in and compacted to touch the central RIK's surface. The shape of the FUB is inherently unstable and it decays rapidly or breaks it's loops rapidly.  However what happens with quarks is that where the angle of connecting RIKs in the field matches a loop  the wave is once again caught in that loop. Again at critical angles and because the shape is inherently unstable it passes to form another FUB  then another, then back to the first. So the wave becomes stuck in a loop between 3 FUBs, each known as a quark and as 3 grouped collectively known as a neutron or proton. The gluon is the RIK through which the wave passes from one quark to another as it does this the RIK is separated from the FUB as it's connecting TREDDs are stretched, thereby detected and known as a gluon. As this momentum leads to a spinning motion (imagine children holding hands spinning in a circle) the other 11 RIKs around the central one are forced out and squeezed together in groups of 12 by the outward momentum, known collectively as a quark so the looping path between all three quarks or "conjoined" FUBs becomes extremely strong as the loops are vey tight making it difficult for  more energy  to enter or to escape making a neutron temporarily strong and the proton permanently extremely strong (in nature unless subjected to immense energy). The mass of the quarks logically dictated by the wavelength of the energy and the amount of energy waves forced in. When these loops are broken in the chain reaction of nuclear power [11] it is the release of massive amounts of this contained looping waves of energy from a compacted area  due to the wave of energy pushing the quarks stretching the spacetime fabric which breaks the path of the photons loop which causes the explosion or generation of nuclear energy. (Explained further in the next section after the overview of the standard model, NUCLEAR ENERGY)
The Electron is one detected wave crest passing through a single RIK detected by the effect the movement the passing wave has on the RIK detected as an independent single particle due to the limitations of observation in 3 dimensional time. 
 
Covalent bonding itself [12] is where electron orbitals meet, touch and share energy along shared loops.
Electron orbitals are where energy waves are stuck in looping paths caused by the neutrons and protons pulling inwards, stretching the surrounding fabric and causing straight paths to become curved at specific angles eventually creating loops. When these are stretched in gravitational zones it does 2 things first it stretches the loop path angle slightly which changes the wavelength of the energy (Isaac Newton's work with light through prisms [13] showing that wavelength can be changed by path change not necessarily only by linear outward/inward expansion of the Doppler effect [14]) and secondly it means the radius from the nucleus to the electron orbital is stretched so it takes longer for that wave to complete a loop around the atom leading to time dilation [15] (in 3 dimensions, mathematical formula given later in the paper). Covalent bonding of elements into molecules is where waves get stuck in looping paths which are formed in this manner as the space-time fabric is pulled into clumps and the path through the fabric is changed from straight to curved. These electron orbitals then clash and merge with other electron orbitals and the waves' energy are shared between two or more atoms. Electric current [16] is where we can move ether as waves of energy through these joined orbital paths, where one wave is forced in another is forced out. Where there is no other outlet the orbital becomes "charged" with extra waves/ether. The detectable mass is the amount of disturbance/wobble caused by the internal looping wave´s energy. To visualise this imagine a roller coaster where the rail/tracks are suspended by strong elastic. As the roller coaster hits a bend the whole rail moves stretching with the momentum. As these waves are travelling at the speed of light the stretch and subsequent "wobble" (mass) is phenomenal. As quarks this is happening at trillions of times a second as the waves complete loop after loop stuck between 3 FUBs bound via 3 RIKs acting as gluons.
Neutrinos/axions are  often the tiny vibrations or mass detected in RIKs as tiny ripples in the connecting TREDDs pass causing the RIKs to vibrate very slightly what I will call "neutrino waves". Essentially neutrino waves are ripples similar to gravitational waves [17] but on a very small scale. Gravitational waves are caused by massive wobble in super massive objects like supernova leading to   vibrations rippling through the field like we see in spiders webs. The waves which are detected as  relatively high energy neutrinos as they pass RIKs are the tiny ripples caused in the field generally as energy released in high energy interactions like nuclear reactions cause vibrations within RIKs which cause the connecting RIKs to bang off each other. The vibration from these collisions ripple out from the source (usually from nuclear reactions like found in our sun where RIKs knock against each other and cause the connecting strands to ripple). As they pass RIKs they shake them and cause that tiny vibration and mass. The three types of  relatively high energy neutrinos are due to either the level of energy sent out from the impact or/and these vibrations going in and out of phase [18]. Of course there are many other types of such minor ripples but neutrinos (and perhaps axions) are the only ones known about so far to affect RIKs due to their relativity extremely strong waves originating from nuclear/elementary particle reactions. Where they hit the large bosons W & Z they knock the energy out  from its loop which enters the field again as the electron family. Whichever electron, muon or tau it decays into depends also on the amount of kinetic energy passing or/and which phase of oscillation the ripple was in when it hit the boson. Neutrino waves perhaps are our best future hope of a means to communicate with advanced civilizations on other planets. This happening over time as our ability to detect, amplify and transmit neutrino waves which can send information faster and theoretically in much greater detail using much less energy than photons. There may already be a UWW universe wide web buzzing with all kinds of funky stuff, I believe there is evidence for it but I will leave that topic for another time.this for transferring physical information, the evidence shows non physical or conscious information travels instantly, that means that theoretically we can already communicate with other conscious beings in other parts of space and time if we can tune into their frequencies. 
 
 
Quantum Chromodynamics [19] is due to oscillation and resonance, where there is one or many waves passing through and varying intensity of the "colour" dictated by which quark the wave is passing through. The one which it is passing through showing the greatest oscillation and brightest "colour", the other two showing incremental decreased resonance after being passed until the wave re-enters and it assumes the strongest oscillation and "colour" again. These constantly changing in sequence between the three.

 

This essential difference is vital in understanding everything else that happens in the field. Energy waves are what passes THROUGH the field causing the RIKs in the field to oscillate, twist, clump together ( and subsequently all matter), stretch (time dilation and gravity). Energy passing on the outside ALONG the RIKs and TREDDs as ripples give us things like neutrinos and gravitational waves. To visualise the difference consider a flexible water pipe has a sound vibration passing through the water inside and someone shakes the pipe up and down sending 2 different waves along the one pipe. Whereas two opposite twists in spacetime strands like for example electrons cancel each other out when they meet head on photons being waves of less energy in the fabric have 2 possibilities, first they pass by each other just like waves in water do as their wavelengths will rarely meet and clash head on, they usually simply pass by each other or secondly it is possible that each connecting TREDD has 2 routes through which waves pass, like a road has a left and right hand lane.The reason why 2 photons meet and pass by each other while electrons annihilate each other emitting high energy photons is for these 2 possible reasons. These can be explained using the water waves analogy. We can send streams of water through a hosepipe and at low pressures/energies these will not affect the pipe's external vibration. If however we suddenly increase the pressure above a certain level it sends a jolt or ripple along the exterior of the hosepipe.  It's a similar effect happening when a high energy wave like an electron is created in the field. Above a certain energy or/and beyond a critical angle it causes the RIKs to twist giving the wobble/mass and when two of these high energy waves meet they clash and annihilate each other emitting high energy photons like 2 large ocean waves would meet and clash sending out spray at great force. Smaller waves in the ocean seem to simply pass each other by. Or it could be that if we have two lanes, an up and down lane and above a certain energy waves create that twist which means the two lanes end up aligning and the waves meet head on with great force. Or it could be a combination of both. 


 The spacetime fabric perhaps having connecting strands like DNA with waves of energy passing up and down on different lanes, each lane can only accommodate one direction of wave. At the very basic level  electrons are the shape of the movement a passing wave above a certain energy causes to a single RIK, i.e. the path of a wave around a single RIK and the force of it's movement as it spirals along the spring type path within the TREDDs causing the RIK itself to turn due to the momentum of the high energy. This we perceive as an electron, it is in fact a measure of the amount of twist experienced by a RIK due to the momentum of the passing wave. As the wave passes it causes this twist which in turn causes some of the TREDDs to get stretched and the connected RIKs twisted in the opposite direction like cogs in a sequence these giving us "opposite helicity" [20] this leading to an increase in time and mass which are directly relational in 3 dimensions (explained later in the paper). So when we talk of spin in particle physics it is probably more appropriate/accurate to use the term twist, 1/2 twist left or right rather than 1/2 spin up or down,  depending also if it is matter or it's equal opposite helicity and therefore which direction the internal wave is travelling. 

The strands TREDDs are perhaps coiled springs perhaps cylindrical flexible tubes which are compacted by twist, attached at every location to 2 RIKs. As mass and time are increased  these are eventually pulled out straight (when there is more pull they seem to stretch further like elastic). Waves of energy still pass at the constant speed of light detected as photons because even though the TREDDs are stretched and their core diameter decreases the waves would still travel through at the same speed except with less energy.
 

NUCLEAR ENERGY
What is actually happening in nuclear fission is that an initial addition of high energy pushes the protons and neutrons very suddenly and violently so the path of the internal photon through the spacetime lattice is changed slightly for long enough that it is no longer in a loop, it is released from it's loop and travels out, spreading out in all directions. This wave of energy spreads out knocks any neighbouring protons and neutrons with similar force which do the same, breaking their loop releases the photon trapped inside. So within one atom of radioactive materials which have a high number of protons and neutrons we have multiple photons released in an instant. This is an incredibly powerful amount of concentrated energy which spreads out and this wave of phenomenally high energy hits the protons and neutrons in neighbouring atoms pushing them out of their loop, their trapped photons are released and the chain reaction continues. The light is released from its loops and the chain reaction continues even beyond the radioactive material because the protons and neutrons of all elements are knocked out of their loops also releasing phenomenal amounts of energy. Only when the amount of energy released from an atom is smaller than the amount of energy needed to break a nuclear bond/loop does the chain reaction stop. 


WHY TIME IS 3 DIMENSIONAL 
3 dimensional time is quite simple, it is a logical property of Einstein's time dilation in Special Relativity. If we blow up a balloon we know that it increases in 3 dimensions of space. If we have any two points marked on the balloon then as it inflates their distance in space increases.   If we send information between these two points along the surface then the time it takes for the information to pass between them is increased in direct proportion to the increase in space. 
All clumps of vortexes detected and known as particles cause ripples which emanate out from the matter within our reality. When these waves merge at intersecting RIKs we get other vortexes form. These ripples however have been travelling at the speed of light away from our detectable reality so we normally cannot experience them because there is no possible way to detect them physically within our known physical universe because nothing physical can travel faster than light. In order to detect them we would need to use something to bounce off them and return to us which is physically impossible. So while time appears to be one dimensional to us with a Universal time or" forward moving series of moments" this is only one dimensional relative to the light and matter detectable within that line between us or "I" and any other object, usually light travelling directly towards us from celestial bodies. It is always a single line but can be measured or detected from any chosen location in any direction we look or detect. We biologically do trillions of these calculations a second to constantly analyse our location in space and time. However any matter travelling outside that one dimensional line is usually undetected by us. The interference pattern in the double slit experiment however provides the evidence, so while objects in space seem separated in 3 dimensions and time seems one dimensional this is a misunderstanding. Time like matter is part of a Universal fabric and only exists separately relative to compartmentalized locations and is every bit as 3 dimensional.  The principle shows that matter near us in space but moving away from us in time is very real but undetectable so while still being closer in space than objects billions of light years away which are within our detectable reality we have previously been unaware of it's existence because while the far away stars, planets, quasars etc are further away they sent light directly towards us in a relatively straight line. Any matter travelling perpendicular to our line of detection passes along a different dimension of time as long as we are spinning (and we always are) so the light that bounces off these objects never returns to us, it cant.  Just like if we are on a train with the windows open we can bounce a ball off the outside of a train that is travelling on the tracks next to our train at the same speed in the same direction, however if that train is moving in the opposite direction or any speed above or below a range relative to the speed of our train, then the ball will not make it back through our window it will bounce back too late or if the other train is moving faster with too much perpendicular added momentum and be pushed forward. This aspect of objects moving beyond our "time spectrum" is explained using different evidence found in the 4 muons detected in the decay of a Higgs Boson at the ATLAS facility at CERN. This is covered in the section on the mass of the standard model particles.

To visualise this imagine time having a curve like matter or any 3 dimensional wave, represented mathematically as a sphere/orb expanding out (for the purpose of the double slit experiment viewed as a dome moving forward  out from the moment in time at the baseline where the particle gun is) and we can view it from the side with a limited range of focus along the dome's lines of latitude, If we focus on the crest we have a small area we have a greater ability to study activity there, once we move down the dome the lines of latitude become wider making the study of specific positions more difficult as there are increasingly more points. The new principle where n is any given number  in this case, unlike in "n" used as a variable number, "n" in this case is a fixed number, nt∝1/nx³ "Lucy's Certainty Principle" explained on the double slit experiment page, shows that the smaller the width of the line of latitude the greater the ability to study points because there are less positions, also we know more about momentum, the detection method in the double slit experiment giving a clearer idea of where the wave crest is in time in relation to the particle gun and the wall. The nearer we get to the crest the greater the certainty of being able to study/analyse. This is essentially where most quantum observations in "real time" happen. So while matter appears like it is made up of individual particles we are only observing that point in space and time as the waves pass through the RIKs of the field which the understanding of 3 dimensional time unlocked. Matter is a collection of transient temporary waves moving through the field which has permanent from (which is flexible and able to form transient shapes as waves of energy create oscillations returning to form after the waves pass, these waves are temporary but can last billions perhaps trillions of years). As we move down the wave of time  our ability to record material events in time decreases because now there are more points along the lines of latitude of the time wave. The smaller the time waves bandwidth the greater the certainty of locating an observable position of matter in a specific area in space and time, while the greater the size of the time bandwidth the less certainty we have of locating an observation at a specific point in space and time.

The webpage covering the solution to the double slit experiment paper which unlocked this unified field theory has a new method of analysis to cross check for 3 dimensional time.


 To illustrate why time dilates with curvature consider two runners traveling along 2 parallel roads (when viewed along one dimension i.e. from above), however one path is flat the other has a hill so the one passing over the hill still moves straight forward but her overall time is stretched due to the curvature(viewed from one dimension “above” she appears to slow down, she doesn't however but her overall time is stretched). Just as mass increases in 3 dimensions so does time.


HOW TO CALCULATE THE VOLUME OF 3 DIMENSIONAL TIME
To illustrate how to calculate the volume of time we need to assume a few measurements.
(a)a universal fixed second which I will call a cosmic second "cs" and a dilateable quantum second "qs" corresponding to the time it takes to send one unit of optical information/light one agreed unit of distance in 1cs at an agreed location which I will set at Earth sea level.
(b)A quantum bit "qb" for a unit of information.
(c)A universal unit of distance, a quantum metre "qm" corresponding to the distance light can travel in a straight line through RIKs in one cs which is through 1,000,000 RIKs at Earth sea level.
(d)A theoretical as yet undiscovered metal which I will name Zancozphoz "Zzz" whose distance from its atomic nucleus to the outside of it´s one and only electron orbital which is perfectly spherical is 1qm at Earth sea level and its electron orbital "shell" extends from 0.7 the width of the radius to the full radius width.
(e) a super massive planet Zob which causes immense time dilation dilating one qs  at Earth's sea level to 0.5qs at Zob's sea level.


If we set one cs as equal to one qs at Earth sea level. This corresponding to the distance we can send one qb 1qm at Earths sea level then using the formula for the volume of a shell 
1.333 x π(3.14)R³-1.333 x π(3.14) x r³
If Zzz has an electron orbital which has a shell which extends from 0.7 the width of the radius to the full width of the radius we can move 0.363qb through one atom of Zzz in one dilateable second (1cs) at earth's sea level because the volume of the shell here is a total of 2.75qm
 1.333x3.14x1 (1³)-1.333x3x3.14x0.343 (0.7³)
=4.185-1.435
=2.75qm
1/2.75qm gives 0.363qb moved in one cs
   
When the atom is taken to Zob and dilated to 0.5ds in one cs because it takes one qb twice as long to travel through 1,000,000 RIKs as they are stretched to twice the distance. Then the electron orbital is also stretched to twice it's width and the electron orbital shell is stretched also so now its volume is 
1.333x3.14x2³-1.333x3.14x1.4³
=1.333x3.14x8-1.333x3.14x2.74
=33.49-11.47
=22.02qm

So now we can't only move 1/2 the amount of information (0.363/2 or 0.181qb)through in one cs. Now the volume is significantly larger 22.02/2.75=8
Roughly 8 times larger so we can only send 1/8 the amount of information 1/22.02 or 0.0454qb  of information through the atom of Zzz in one cs

This is perhaps not the exact formula, we may need to factor in other variables which affect the equation also but hopefully it illustrates why time dilates in 3 dimensions. It also probably means when the annoying little brats upstairs get up and play their games online  on the cafe's free wifi on Zob it slows down the broadband eight times more and is 8 to the power of 3 times more €&@#€ng annoying  for whoever is already stressed out trying to complete the Theory of Everything on Zob trying to liberate the consciousness of the intelligent beings of Zob who are also stuck in an extremely fragile, uncertain moment of existence and confusion in the hope they can then all come together in understanding/consciousness and secure it's future/survival.

To try to explain time dimensions with comparison to physical dimensions imagine a ball moving forward. From afar or to the untrained eye it seems to be moving forward at speed along the forward dimensional axis but it is usually also spinning. So when one hits or deflects that ball in order to get it to go where we want it to go one takes into account the spin in three dimensions. Similarly with time while it moves forward in one dimension there are also variables happening in the other two dimensions of time which we must take into account to advance to where we want to get to. To illustrate it, consider on a global scale the world has become predominantly focused on getting things done as fast as possible in the search for efficiency but this has ended up with immense inefficiency. While some can send a robot to mars in the assertion it is in the interest of the advancement of mankind millions are still living in mud huts with no primary education, running water or electricity, in the case of Deaf people, millions of highly intelligent people like Patrick Otama from Uganda [72] without even access to language. An immense loss of brainpower (and goodwill) which is detrimental to not only those in poverty but everyone. If one watches the film "the Queen of Katwe" [73] a good example of the slightest access to education unleasing immense intelligence that was always there. We saw with the development of fertilisers the idea of faster crops with bigger yields, though there is much evidence that this was/is untrue [77], but with these fertilisers came inferior food quality, depletion of soil microbiome diversity, loss of animal species and vegetation diversity. With such mentioned poverty comes the increased risk of conflict. While we tend to see physical objects as two dimensional we know a physical object is three dimensional defined by 3 dimensions of space. While we tend to think of time as one dimensional it is not it is defined by 3 dimensions of time. The predominant focus is on one dimension past to future. When one focuses on the present as in meditation one tends to stop focusing on the past and future by feeling all that is happening now and ultimately sees more possibilities. While we can dwell on the past which is often futile or believe the future holds a certainty which it never does (things never turn out as we imagine they will) when in the moment we can feel the vibrations of all that is possible within the moment and we are not limited by our expectations or false conclusions. It is a fuller existence because we see more of the potential possibilities. Hence why it takes intense meditation practice over years for qi/chi practitioners to be able to manipulate qi to be used in healing and martial arts. While qi energy manipulation has been ignored and often rubbished as nonsense by popular physical focused sciences it is very real. While some of it's effects can be mimicked using fake setups by illusionists determined not to believe the evidence and prove it is all illusion, it is a real phenomenon. Thanks to excellent open minded scientists, journalists and the internet we can see examples of meditation manifesting phenomenal powers in people such as Prahlad Jani [74] who has not eaten or drank anything for over 70 years, D.J."dynamo Jack" from Indonesia [75] with incredible healing powers amongst other capabilities and Gonzales Sensei [76]  who can create a sense of sleepiness in animals even over great distances. All have been scrutinised by scientific teams and all have been shown to be genuine . Essentially it seems they are all focusing on the moment and using the vibrations within that moment to exert effects on the physical world around them. Knowing there is a physical field that vibrates, it makes perfect sense that they are affecting the vibrations with their own vibrations and creating phenomenon out of the field which most people who are not centred on the moment cannot do. To illustrate it I will use the example of juggling and the egg and spoon race. While the aim is to move forward with the egg, speed is counter productive, one must first focus on the balance, get and maintain that balance while advancing skillfully. Similarly one can juggle while walking in a carnival but one cannot run while juggling or the rhythm is soon lost. In a music band or orchestra one instrument cannot improve the music by forcing all the others to go faster, it is the quality and richness of the time not the speed that allows all the harmonics to mingle and create that magic experienced by an invigorating sense of almost timeless beauty and creative power. Sometimes detected physically as chi energy gathered together in space and time moving/tingling through the spine. Similarly when we focus on getting something done as fast as possible we lose the ability to focus on all the possibilities and it often ends up counter productive. 
Time does not just dilate due to the mechanical workings of the universe though, it is affected by consciousness. It is likely everyone will know that time seems to pass by seamlessly when we are with people we love, when playing or watching a game, when creating a work of art, when doing work we enjoy. Conversely when we are separated from those we love, when we are bored, when doing work we dislike or waiting for something to happen time dilates so a minute can seem like an hour. While not measurable using mechanical means because technically the clock still ticks at the same rate that time dilation is real. While the clock still ticks at the same rate we already know that time dilates with disconnection from who or what we love, if the clock still ticks at the same rate the second still has the same length but it must have an increased width which cannot be detected in one dimensional time. To any physicist who says it just feels like time dilates in this way I would say two things first that is an assumption show us the evidence to back it up, secondly what are feelings? They are detection operators, we feel things to detect phenomenon, whether using our sense of smell to detect if food is fresh or rancid, touch to detect the shape and receptiveness of a sweethearts skin, these are not necessarily quantifiable using numbers but they are real methods of detection to quantify if something should be engaged with or left alone.  Another way to visualise it is like a triangular pyramid which gives the correlation with the results in the double slit experiment when we detect for which way we are looking to increase the focus on a point so the orientation of time is towards the point and we get the mark left like a particle would leave, when we don't focus on making a point the pattern is towards the opposite side of the point, the plane so the pattern is more widespread. It seems logical that as the physical dimensions of space are characterised by curvature, the physical representation of the dimensions of time are perhaps like the visual representation of a droplet being curved at the bottom and with a peak at the top.  This shape perhaps being changed in orientation depending on whether one is trying to make a point or have fun. The obvious balance of course would logically to have a bit of both. The shape of time perhaps represented as circular but becoming elongated into points like in the drop shape with conscious focus. To any physicist who may try to argue this is just conjecture yes it is but that is what science is, conjecture/predictions followed by logic and evidence to explain a phenomenon, when it is non physical we must go with the logic alone. it is still science, perhaps not solely physical science but science nonetheless. It gives a logical explanation and using Occam's law we must go with the theory that shows the best correlation with the phenomena   above and before any loose ended incomplete theories no matter how complex and convincing some of the proposals and mathematics appear which like the big bang theory can lead to ideas devoid of sound thorough logic, which need fictional theories which have no evidence to hold them together, or if it is not all quantifiable using numbers (although STT also has plenty of mathematics). It is  partly this obsession with mathematics before logic, often devoid of logic even counter to logic which is ultimately only a language form to express logic like any other generally only spoken fluently by the highly privileged and educated which has kept this breakthrough suppressed and attacked  https://youtu.be/YR5ApYxkU-U [63]. “Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex… It takes a touch of genius – and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.” – Albert Einstein As there hasn't been a credible testable theory offered to explain the double slit experiment in 100 years and now there is one with testable predictions,robust logic,mathematics that work and a theory of Everything that leaves no end untied according to the law of physics "Occam's Law" STT is the correct one. So it seems I killed the big bang party ( but the big bang party never really got going though you all gave it a good try, no need to worry the party has arrived and everyone fun who treats others, equally with respect is welcome  ....its Spring Time Party Time https://youtu.be/mW1dbiD_zDk (I would use musical notes with the sentence  but as keyboards have obviously been designed by the devil I can't, that is without music graphics, I can't see any other reason, it is really annoying and unhelpful that some of the most important symbols -music notation- are not on keyboards... I mean come on!)

THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF LIFE THE QUANTUM FIELD
In computing we know that everything comes down to 2 things at the binary level O and I or a series of on and offs, yes and no´s, light and dark. It turns out that the fabric of space-time is made up of 2 basic things also:  spherical field particles termed “RIKs” and connecting springs/pipes “TREDDs”.  
With resistance the pipes are stretched but still holding the RIKs and they both hold passing vibration/energy through the internal ether in space-time.  Curvature leading to increased time with extra path between RIKs that are not touching but stretched. Extra paths because when compacted and touching all TREDDs are relaxed giving a short distance, when stretched the path becomes longer. The direction and timing of the energy wave which is moving through affecting whether it has positive or negative charge (charge explained in more detail later). When the spacetime fabric is together vibrations as matter, collectively known as planets, suns [22], black holes [23] would theoretically move straight forward but due to the curvature of large objects by gravity pulling strands together the fabric gets twisted from straight lines into curves forcing passing objects to move forward along curved paths.

FUN SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENT FOR ALL AGES
Here is a great, simple, fun, perhaps gross for some but fascinating scientific experiment using only fingers and saliva: if we have healthy clear saliva we can put our (clean washed and dried) tips of our thumb and forefinger in our mouth to gather some saliva (the freshest saliva can be found pouring out from the gland just under the tip of the tongue). Then if we press both tips together and pull them apart there is a thread or strand of saliva hanging between both tips. If we wait a few moments we will see the strand change into a series of spherical droplets attached by thin thread, mimicking the structure of a strand of the spacetime fabric, almost suggesting that we were made in the image of the universe. It is worth noting that while it is often said that our bodies are 70% water that is by weight. In fact 99% of the molecules in our bodies are water [78] so in some sense we are made up of almost pure water. The other 1% of molecules are much more massive than water so are by weight much heavier. So our saliva would be also 99% (or more) water with the hidden magic of the biological universe holding it together. 
 
It may be difficult to grasp at first for minds not familiar with the huge numbers physicists are used to but we must bear in mind that these RIKs and TREDDs are also being stretched and contracted within the fabric at speeds of thousands of kilometres a second as the energy passes through in the form of, quarks, atoms, molecules, planets, suns and black holes. This movement through the fabric of spacetime is not just movement relative to our sun or even our central black hole Sag-A [24] it is movement in other directions like for example the direction our Galaxy [25] is moving as a unit through the spacetime fabric. To understand why the waves move along RIKs and TREDDs in the field but appear to hold relative fixed positions at times in space consider mini whirlpools/vortexes in a river or stream. These appear to stay in the same position but water molecules pass in their trillions. It is not the molecules or particles staying and keeping shape, these pass by at high speed it is the force exerted which maintains the shape. In the space-time fabric that force exerted is inside the RIKs and TREDDs maintaining shapes so essentially it is the same principle inverted.
  As the waves move through the  RIKs they pass from RIK to RIK so while it appears like the FUBs keep the same quantum particles they don't. They appear to stay in the same relative position in the form of matter as waves of energy passing through the field draw them together by the negative energy created in the waves wake. The waves looping at trillions or more times a second. They gain and shed RIKs at perhaps trillions  or more  times a second. Again I refer back to the inversion of the water vortex principle, mini whirlpools in a stream appear to hold water in place but they don't. The water "particles" pass in their trillions it is the overall pattern of the energy which maintains the shape. Similar to the principle of passing energy through a Newtons Cradle toy. As we and matter move through space we constantly get hit by incoming RIKs which the vortices of waves of energy transfer to and simultaneously we lose RIKs as they are knocked out and left behind as the energy as matter travels forward. 
It is the vacuum type effect of negative energy that keeps the energy "locked together" as waves get stuck in loops and this shape consistent as the energy passes along the quantum realm at up to many thousands of kilometres a second. So fast and the waves traveling relative to us as we observe that it appears to be actual particles of matter. It is in fact the energy passing through the quantum field. We perceive matter as gas, liquid and solid whereas in fact it is vibration moving so fast it appears solid. As a new concept for some not educated in physics it is perhaps awe inspiring or "mind blowing" that volcanoes, mountains, seas, trees, us etc can all be a collection of waves of energy passing through this lattice keeping overall form but it is so. Similar (but not exactly) like if we have a soft ball on a string it is tangible but if we swing that at high speeds it appears to be hard and it's path impenetrable, at incredibly high speeds the orbital shape it makes as it spins makes it feel almost "solid" we cannot break its path with our hands it is spinning too fast. If we invert the effect vibrations have in matter in the macro realm we can perhaps understand better. If we have an object sitting on a speaker and we play loud deep music through it, the speaker will vibrate and the object will move. As the RIKs in the field are fixed and cannot move (only oscillate) it is the energy which is moved and that movement creates the shapes we detect. With the speaker we can sit on it or place a hand on it but after a moment we become unaware of it, we become one with it in the sense that we no longer detect it as separate, until a loud deep vibration passes through it. Then we notice, feel or detect it, the object is the same it is the vibration which enables us to notice, detect or focus on the form. Similar to clouds, we may see shapes which look like rabbits or angels or Albert Einstein or many other shapes but we know it is simply the shape created by the energy affecting the water molecules in the clouds. We can feel matter not because particles are moving through space, we feel the RIKs as we pass through them, similar to how we may run through a forest we feel branches and leaves hit us,  just like RIKs the branches stay in position as we pass and like the RIKs the branches continue to wobble (oscillate) for a while after we pass. Because the RIKs have form this is what we detect, we feel these RIKs vibrate.
Similar to how we can feel loud deep vibrations if we stand near large speakers but here it is gazillions of tiny vibrations at the quantum level. To understand why the field is termed dark matter, it stays relatively static and unnoticeable until it is disturbed, as vibrations pass they cause visible movement, consider camouflaged objects sitting on a camouflaged speaker. While at rest there is no movement we see nothing until a deep vibration is passed through the speaker, then we can see the objects as the vibration forces them to move and the shapes become visible. The objects remain essentially the same, the vibration causes the movement and all subsequent noticeable activity. 

When we have the fabric of space-time in what is traditionally known as outer space there is little to no pull on the fabric so everything is together. All RIKs are more likely to be touching in relatively straight lines 6 touching a central 1 at any given point in the field. We do not experience time in the same way there is no stretch in time. However when we look at the nucleus of atoms and on larger scales looking at large groups of atoms (planets, suns, stars etc) and get nearer these large objects the fabric is stretched out so the interval between RIKs is increased (explained in more detail in the next section: GRAVITY). Time and mass begin to come into play as the waves of energy cannot pass seamlessly through the fabric anymore it takes more time and the resistance causes the vibrations/mass, the greater the "clump" the more resistance and time. As Einstein showed time appears to have less effect the faster we go until approaching the speed of light at which point time would seem to stop or be unnoticeable in objects outside our frame of reference. Where there is no interval there is no stress, stretch or distress, time is seamless. When we come nearer large objects these are spinning and the spin is pulling in the fabric of space-time similar to how a spinning wheel pulls in fabric around the spool. Of course it is not a single strand though, it is strands coming from all directions of the quantum field and it is around a spherical core and it is not a complete pull in of the fabric, it moves through the fabric pulling in the fabric and releasing it again as it travels past. The stretch means the RIKs become separated in the spacetime fabric and pulled out in lines towards the spinning objects centre. One cannot stretch only the TREDDs connecting pairs or individual groups of RIKs in a row along one dimension, all connecting RIKs and TREDDs become stretched also in 3 dimensions. In gravity the path of light is changed leading to redshift   [26] as illustrated on the images page on the website. To picture it consider If we send an object at speed past a water vortex [27] it will be drawn in. If it is moving fast enough its path will be changed slightly, it will lose momentum but will become straight again as it comes out of the pull of the vortex, in the field this results in a change in wavelength i.e. redshift. Other objects travelling slow enough will be drawn in and get caught in a loop spiraling in. The vortex itself moving through the water disturbing water molecules as it passes which then come back to occupy space in a relatively local area when the vortex has passed. Any objects which have been drawn into the vortex will continue moving with the vortex. The change in how we must view matter may be compared to how astronomers once thought the Earth was flat. It´s a completely new reality we have become aware of. We are not made of particles we are made of waves passing through the field particles “RIKs”. Why I emphasise this is because one of the new and unexpected truly mind blowing revelations of STT shows that we are not made of particles "we" are conscious beings "souls" existing outside the spacetime fabric holding these vortices of energy together. The logic is clear and the evidence for consciousness fortifies it, in my mind, beyond doubt. I can find no other possible logic.

GRAVITY.
Gravity is based on the stretch mentioned, not so much an actual total stretch but a stretch in the fabric caused by the drag of the waves of energy. The waves are still moving through the field so they can’t completely spin to gather up and simultaneously stretch the fabric but the drag from the waves still does. Just like if you spin your finger through water the water will not stick to your finger like a fabric would but the drag influences the water nonetheless so much so if you continue to spin you create a very powerful and fast vortex in the water. This fabric is being pulled in as the vibration approaches and simultaneously relaxed on the far side as the waves pass at an almost incomprehensible rate to our human minds, relatively comprehensible using numbers. With smaller objects (smaller groups of vibrations) their pull is less and they get pulled in towards the larger objects vibrational 3d vortex which then grows in mass/size. To visualise it consider a 3 dimensional lattice of elastic with axes x,y and z meeting at equal distances between every intersection. Imagine the elastic is metallic and has magnetic properties. If we pass a magnet through it the intervals nearest the magnet will be pulled together so the lattice is stretched. The closer the magnet the closer the intersections in the lattice are as it passes. In the field the space between intersections pulled perhaps to thousands, millions, gazillions... times closer to a central point than they are at rest. Using this illustration we see that the lattice only returns to it's original shape after the magnet has passed. The larger the mass of an object the more tightly the RIKs and TREDDs are pulled together leading to the shortest distance between strands. As energy caught in loops creates a vacuum type effect these loops move closer together and the places in the field with the shortest distances or smallest angles between connecting strands offer the least resistance to that vacuum type pull, so the energy moves to the point of least resistance. To illustrate or demonstrate in a class or lecture one can setup two elastic strands and slide them through 2 rings (as can be viewed in this brief video onhttps://yadi.sk/d/f19oWd2TgJNM0A or on youtubehttps://youtu.be/GVVVbq1QQbc -the channel also shows the movement of quarks in a short video). As the rings are moved with tension on the elastic the strands of elastic will pull towards each other. The greater the stretch the more the massive objects are moved along towards thinner gaps hence the faster the pull together of two tightly compacted objects. The nature of matter is to find equilibrium [28], when the fabric of space-time is stretched all vibrations are pulled with it. Vibrations being energy moving through the quantum field. Gravity is this mix of spin and stretch. It seems that when a vibration becomes entangled in the space-time fabric it can and does lead to spin due to waves entering RIKs' internal loops displacing the medium or ether that energy moves through within the fabric which in turn leads to a vacuum type effect holding the units of energy together in a buildup of RIKs which can grow in clumps around each other, as they collectively displace more medium/ether and maintain tighter nuclear and electron loops. 
As the lattice is pulled in towards a central point the points surrounding the large objects are pulled closer to the centre creating curvature in the surrounding fabric. This means that other objects can no longer travel straight but their path is curved and at certain points creates paths which are perfectly looped creating electron orbitals at the molecular level and at the cosmic level planetary orbits around suns and suns around black holes. Black holes are spinning so fast that even when light is trying to travel out the fabric of space-time is being wound in so fast and so stretched that the spin is pulling the fabric in faster than the speed of the vibration we know as light so light itself cannot escape. When Einstein proved that light [29] is affected by gravity he was proving that the vibration traveling through the invisible field (invisible at rest) was drawn off a straight path by the pull of the space-time fabric as it was being stretched by the pull of an objects spin/twist. While stationary black holes [30] exist in mathematical models STT predicts they don't exist in reality. Black holes if stationary would allow light to escape as paths would open at certain points allowing light to pass out as they grow in size because gravity is not a force as such it is a mechanism. It is the spin which is faster than light when combined with the black hole's acceleration through spacetime which prevents light from escaping.
With less density objects' gravitational pull in the fabric is with less force so the stretch is less and objects move along the TREDDs with less speed. Galileo was correct that objects of different weight would fall at the same speed if they have the same density. Objects of the same weight but different densities would have different distributions of energy at points in the field so the opposite force exerted back would be different. Similar (but not exactly) like if we tied two elastic ropes to a goalpost and put both through a metal ring say 2kg in weight. Then two people hold one end of each rope and walk away at 45' angles to the goalposts while another holds the metal ring and walks directly away from the goalpost so the three end up an equal distance from the goal line. The elastic ropes are now stretched and there is tension to send the ring flying along the ropes at speed to hit the goalpost. However if we change the distribution of energy on the ring we should see the ring move towards the goalpost at different speeds. So if we try it first with a 2kg ring whose diameter is 30 cm, the ropes are 3cm diameter at no stretch and the people in the experiment stand say 5 metres from the goal line holding the ends the shape would almost be like a T shape and as the middle person lets go of the ring it will go quite fast towards the goalpost. Next we try with a 2kg ring whose diameter is 1.5 metres and the 3 stand at the same spot, there will not be so much stretch on the ropes it will be shaped more like a V between the ring and the goalpost so we should see the ring move towards the goalpost at a slower speed when it is released. If we try the same inner diameter size rings representing the same density but in different weights the speed should be the same for objects of the same size but we have to adjust the strength of the ropes in proportion to the weight. This is because in the field the object has weight in proportion to how many TREDDs it passes along. A heavy object exerts more downward force but the resistance of the points in the field is also exerting opposite force. a lighter object exerts less downward force but the field exerts less points of resistance so altogether the speed would be the same. Was it perhaps the high amount of metal in the structure of bird feathers accounting for why the hammer and feather fell at the same time on the moon?
"Nice shot!" (That's my fictional mate Mick cheering for me for hitting the cursor at exactly the right spot first time in a paragraph edit with tiny characters that I can barely read on my mobile sometimes even with my glasses on. That definitely wasn't Mick Hucknall that time. That was definitely fictional Mick or to be politically correct virtual Mick as I did create him so strictly speaking he's not fictional any more as he now exists in more minds than mine. He has a habit of saying nice shot when I hit the spot [97])
While the theory behind Supernova [31] explosions appear correct with evidence there is room for at least some other ways some supernovas occur. Using Spring Time Theory it is also likely that while it can take thousands of years for light to get from a stars core to its surface and escape, if a star is hit directly head on by another star or massive planet arriving at phenomenal speed the gravity holding that light trapped can be disrupted releasing thousands of years worth of light in a very short time. This would also explain why some of these stars either slow up or down after a supernova not just by the conservation of angular momentum. If the impact from the large object was against the spin then the star slows down losing activity often eventually dying. If the impact is with the direction of spin the spin accelerates sometimes faster than the speed of light (when combined with its path through spacetime) becoming a black hole as no light can escape because the spin prohibits light from escaping due to the fabric being twisted faster than the speed light waves are traveling. So they can never reach the event horizon before their path turns inwards again. This is why black holes increase in mass rather than information being lost down any imaginary wormhole. Here the light must remain as the black hole grows in mass and size as more matter (energy) is absorbed or as physicists say is eaten. Also possibly some super novae are as the result of quasars [33] which have become so massive and spinning so fast they reach a point of resistance in the fabric like an elastic that has been wound as tight as it can. Once it reaches this point the field exerts enough resistance/opposite force to try to move back to it´s original form and as it does the speed of the quasars spin is slowed down below the speed of light again and phenomenal amounts of energy as light and other by products are released back into the field in an instant. While black holes appear to be dark and mysterious from the outside they are phenomenally hot and bright inside. STT also disputes the theory that information can be lost in a black hole. Optical information can't, some matter would certainly be smashed. Protons and most atomic neuclei would lose their electron shells but may remain intact., what does escape is kinetic energy in the form of vibrations as the black hole's movement sends ripples out along the spacetime web detected as gravitational waves and at great distances perhaps as neutrinos).  This likely explaining where high energy gamma rays come from...quasars! Which have stretched and wound up the fabric of spacetime so tight it reaches the point of resistance like an elastic band that can be wound no further and starts to turn the other way. Once below the speed of light a galaxies worth of light, hundreds of billions of times the energy our sun would release in it's lifetime, is released in an instant, flinging protons and other cosmic rays out at near the speed of light to be sent throughout the universe in every direction.  Using STT I also refute that wormholes  or infinite all consuming singularities exist anywhere in the known universe. They exist only in the imagination, good cartoons, great sci-fi movies and the stomachs of teenagers.

FUN GRAVITY EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES:
two people stand opposite each other and hold two skipping ropes both looped through one bracelet. If one person stretches her arms out the bracelet would be pulled to the person opposite if he keeps his hands together. This is kind of like the principle of gravity. The bracelet is pulled by gravity to the narrow end of the ropes which is usually at the ground on planets surfaces but in matter because all the atoms are spinning the spin of the atoms in an object(like a ball) as it touches the ground have huge stored energy in their electron shells. So the impact of the incoming ball bends the space time fabric slightly but the outward force of light spinning through their electron shells rebound the field back and sends the ball flying away again and it bounces back up a bit like a ball off a spinning wheel on a bicycle that is turned upside down or a person off a trampoline a bit but not exactly it's kind of a mix of a bit of both. Eventually it feels the stretch or pull of gravity again and is pulled back towards the ground, every time it lands it is sent off again but with less energy until it slows a bit with every bounce/rebound, until it stops and stays relatively still. It is never fully still though it still has gazillions of atoms spinning and it is still moving through space time at phenomenal speeds . 

When we bounce balls off the ground it is partly because the ball is made of trillions of atoms spinning kind of like wheels they exert huge pressure on the field and when a ball hits the ground they are hitting trillions of atoms which are also spinning like wheels causing both surfaces to exert great outwards pressure so the ball is sent flying away again. In the case of a rubber ball it is the ball which acts like the trampoline causing the field to stretch and rebound within it's sphere.If these atoms didn't have light waves spinning through their electron shells at huge speeds they would neither appear solid or have that internal energy to push other objects away again. Some objects bounce better than others partly because their atoms are closer together so collectively their atoms exert
more outward force,partly because their surface distribution is less so there is more opposite energy concentrated to the smaller points of impact and partly because in material like rubber the electron shells are both tightly woven and in a sense closed so not able to absorb energy from or pass energy to other atoms' electron orbital shells, so less energy is transferred between them on impact and the bounce back is stronger. The tightly woven atoms act like a tightly bound trampoline. . 
ORBITALS OF ELECTRONS (Added 25 July 2019 up to "radiation") PLUS THE STRUCTURE OF NEUTRONS AND PROTONS ADDED 1st /Aug/2019
The energy/vibration travels forward in all directions as it moves. In the quantum world the object/vibration/energy can only move forward but as the fabric of space time becomes curved that path also becomes curved hence why waves (perceived as electrons) get fixed in orbitals around an atom's nucleus. In effect the strong force/interaction is merely where perfect loops are formed so energy is contained to spin within them, the weak force/interaction is where the paths do not form such perfect loops and energy can escape. Quarks movements are always 2 against one 2up 1down 2down 1up etc. Each quark made up of 13 RIKs in Newton and Gregors´ 13 "kissing balls" shape as explained previously. One "RIK" lost by each as a gluon shared with another. All RIKs essentially the same, carrying energy travelling as waves passing through the field, when passing between quarks the RIK is detected as a gluon, when travelling along a path it is detected as an electron and collectively when moving through loops in internal paths of groups of RIKs as FUBs detected as quarks, muons, taus, and the large bosons. While gluons are detected in labs as having no mass on their own they act as "bridges" at high tensions so their masses are distributed and detected in the overall mass of the standard model particle.  Hence why the mass of a proton [34] is 1836 times more than an electron. 1728 being the cumulative stretch caused by the twist and “wobble"/mass of the 12 RIKs in each quark 12³ plus the cumulative spin of the 3 shared gluons binding them by shared pull 12 x 3 kissing balls “FUBs x 3 gluons 12x3x3 108+1728 giving us 1836 altogether. The reason a Neutron has the neutral charge is explained in the section on charge. To simplify here: the path of the internal photon is such that it crosses over it's own path virtually immediately and the charge remains inside. In the case of a neutron conversion to a proton is where the internal looping wave crosses over its own path perhaps giving the mass of two electrons due to that momentary double push adding to the momentum in that RIK. It changes it's shape enough to hit another external RIK sending out the energy and mass of an electron and an anti-neutrino so it loses just enough momentum to change into the proton shape and mass, losing the mass of about 2 electrons due to the loss of the momentum of one electron and the dampening down of the equivalent force of one RIK. It however now has a very strong loop and the internal wave doesn't cross over itself making it extremely stable. While there is an estimated extremely long lifetime of the proton this is obviously conjecture and because it has an extremely strong self sustaining loop I see no reason why it should decay over time especially as STT shows that energy is created in 3 dimensional time. The only factor which could cause it to decay, that I can see, is entering into conditions which cause nuclear reactions. in fact it seems likely it would become even more stable over time perhaps reaching the stability where it takes increasingly more energetic conditions to cause such nuclear reactions

Where the single defined energy unit is the amount of energy of a wave passing through a single RIK (this passing known as an electron). The RIK has one position and it's wobble/mass is the product of the momentum of one passing wave. In the case of standard model particles larger than an electron the overall mass is the overall number of positions (RIKs) involved by the overall compounded momentum of passing or looping waves.
We can use the equation for the volume of a sphere again to show the probability of locating a position. If the time unit is a quantum tik "click" which is the time it takes light to travel the radius of one RIK. Then one click gives us the volume of the RIK as 0.5238. 1.333 x 3.14 x 0.5³=4.192x 0.125 we get the number 0.5238. If the time is tripled so now it passes from the centre of the first RIK and through another in every connecting direction that is 3 RIK radius' so we get a volume of 14.1 which is almost exactly 27 times the volume of one RIK which is 3³. Which is the amount of RIKs directly connected in the universal shape of the field so now we have 27 times less chance of locating a standard model particle's position. If the time is extended for the wave to pass the width of 2 connecting RIKs in every direction (5 radius lengths) we get a volume of 65.312 which again is almost exactly 125 times the volume of one RIK and 125 times less likely to locate a standard model particle's position. So we get the equation for the probability showing the value of time t is inversely proportional to the value of position "x" to the power of 3 (and vice versa) so where n is any given number nt is proportional to 1/nx³ (nt∝1/nx³), if we increase or decrease the time we increase or decrease the amount of RIKs affected in every direction by the volume of time to the power of 3. 
But we don't want the whole wave we only want to detect in the area which corresponds to the back screen. So initially we set the possible area of hits as the back wall so the range is the area covered from the particle gun to all positions in matter in between the gun and the back screen. So some hits will arrive on the front screen and never make it through to the back screen while some time we get waves passing and interfering leaving marks on the back wall. So we get a cone shaped area between the particle gun and the back screen. However when the wave hits the front screen it forms the 2 secondary waves after the slits and we see the interference pattern form within the widest circular area of the cone which is on the back screen. However when we set detectors the cone is reduced to 2 paths each shaped like a triangle (similar to that of a thin slice of pizza with its crust cut off) so the thinnest part extends from the particle gun through the slits and the widest part corresponds to the area where we see the twin bands on the back screen. The detection is set up and if the wave crest hits within a certain time it registers the passing standard model particle. If no wave passes within that time bandwidth it detects nothing but the wave crest passing the other slit still hits the back screen as it arrives within the bandwidth of time set to the crust end of the pizza slice on the back screen. We also have to dilate the time because with mass the field is stretched so it takes longer for energy to travel the same amount of RIKs in every direction so time dilates in 3 dimensions. So the smaller the bandwidth of time the greater the certainty we have of locating a specific position because there are proportionally less positions plus the less the momentum the greater the chance we have of detecting it (similar to how  it is easier to detect and save a football kicked with less force by Ronaldinho than a ball kicked with full force by him...slightly easier [96)
m=(4/3.πc³-el Mev/c²).nY.nx.p.3Δt
I will continue with the Higgs Boson which is different than normal matter in the sense that whereas normal matter as we know it which is relatively stable is usually created in nature by a single wave looping inside the RIKs, others like the heavier quarks are engineered in high energy accelerators by forcing in more waves of energy. The Higgs Boson needs 3 waves to enter loops simultaneously or almost immediately one after the other to hold shape hence it has only ever been detected in high energy particle accelerators. What happens is this. The force of one wave entering at a specific angle and wavelength loops and creates negative energy in its wake (similar to a pulling undercurrent in ocean waves) which draws in all 13 RIKs into the FUB shape which wobbles, detected as mass and that wobble/mass accumulates as each subsequent wave of energy hits almost instantaneously one after another or simultaneously with each other. So each of the 3 photons entering causes a mass of 13³ which gives a total mass of 6591 times that of a single RIK's wobble ie. An electron. However there are also moments where each wave arrives travelling from the core of the FUB to hit a RIK head on stretching it away from the group so we have the mass of an electron moving away from the momentarily stable FUB. Meantime there are also 2 waves travelling with the FUB structure with their momentum each adding to the momentum by 1/3 the force of an electron not the full electron mass as the RIKs are now touching and the waves are moving in the FUB except not directly opposite the stretched and extended RIK because their overall directions are away from the Higgs centre which when both are compounded is 1/3². So we have 13³ x 3 x ((12 x 3) + 1 + 1/3²)= 6591 x (36+1+.111)=6591 x 37.111 = 244599 times the mass of a single electron going by the standard model [5] where an electron is 0.511 Mev/c² and a Higgs Boson is 124.97Gev/c². This is soon hit by a 4th wave of energy disrupting the loops allowing all 3 waves to escape, the shape collapses completely and the other 3 waves escape in an instant. I predict when detection is developed fine enough the sequence of events will be this, the 13 ball structure appears and grows in mass as it is followed by 2 almost immediate impacts followed by a moments of a RIK stretching outwards as the single wave hits the RIK head on with the "mexican hat" shape caused by the 12 RIK FUB spinning simultaneously around the axis of the extended RIK's pull, then the 4th wave of energy hits and the shape collapses with 4 waves of energy as photons escaping to form the associated by products. Currently we are only seeing part of the sequence due to the limitations of 3 dimensional time, the detail I expect shall be expanded as technology advances. We should also eventually detect the FUB shape existing for tiny moments with a single wave of energy arriving and leaving in a lifespan much shorter than any other "particle" in the standard model, perhaps dozens, hundreds or even thousands of times shorter than the average lifespan of a Higgs Boson and with a mass of about 6.643 Mev/c² being 13 times the mass of a single electron.


Muons are where pairs of 2 FUBs each share one central binding gluon giving pairs which are connected to 3 stretched/extended RIKs as "free gluons" which are stretched banging in and out adding to the wobble/mass 12 + 12 RIKs sharing 1 = 23 (2 bound FUBs) x the the mass of the 3 stretched gluons and strands = 69 (Ooooooooh! That reminds me of something wonderful!!! https://youtu.be/eFjjO_lhf9c ) so we get the collective wobble/mass of the spinning pairs and stretched "free gluons" giving us the 3 moments of time dilation 69 x 3 giving 207 times the mass of a wave passing through one RIK i.e. an electron. Because a Muon is two conjoined FUBs it's forward momentum spinning around a single central axis is very strong as it is balanced unlike in neutrons where the fact there are 3 means it's direction alternates constantly between 3 axes. So the muon can penetrate matter to great depths with great force. 

The tau is 4 FUBs held together by 6 RIKs acting as gluons  because the shape is so tight the middle RIK in each FUB is being cancelled out creating no mass and the RIKs closest to the centre of the shape don't give any effective mass. so we have 9 constant core RIKs in each FUB, so we have 9 x 4³ giving us 576 x the extra wobble/mass due to the collisions between the 6 connecting gluons giving us 3456.  This time because the shape is so strong there is tiny time dilation. This time all six RIKs act as gluons,  This time because the shape is so tight there is miniscule time dilation only occuring every time one FUB stretches away from the group. From my calculations I am getting around 0.33535 of a stretch in time, with 3 moments of this time dilation that is 1.00605 x 3546 giving 3476.9 times the mass of an electron. The exact figure may be different, it is difficult to tell with various figures online but the overall shape and dynamics make iron tight logical sense.
Mesons are where the wave is being transferred between 2 FUBs but rather than spin around alternating between 3 axes like neutrons, protons and taus (neutrons and taus spinning on all 3 axes while a muon spins on one moving forward on it also) it is moving around 2 separate 3 dimensional axes. Each of the 2 FUBs  is spinning around one axis like if we had 2 cogs in any machine say a clock for example and we had the clock suspended from a pulley with the 2 cogs being focused on spinning, one spinning clockwise one anticlockwise, both facing upwards and pushed forward down a tightrope. The machine would move forward and the cogs would spin on their individual axis one clockwise and one anti-clockwise while moving forward along the tightrope acting as another axis for the both.Because the energy wave in the meson is passing between the 2 FUBs head on back and forth unlike in protons or neutrons where the momentum is shared in 3 directions it is stretched slightly farther apart which makes it's detected width 1/5 more than the width of protons or neutrons. I will leave this one not calculated so anyone can try the formula for themselves.

The W and Z bosons are where 2 photons enter into loops and create the FUB shape. 
The difference between them due to the second wave arriving from a different direction relative to the first. Similar to how a ball could be kicked forward with spin, top heavy or bottom heavy like the W bosons or almost perfectly, head on like the Z Boson. So the Z Boson's spin is directly forward on the axis of the path the FUB is moving forward on. Another illustration. In the W bosons the direction of spin depending on which side the second wave arrives, sending it spinning forward clockwise or anticlockwise. A bit like of we put a spinning fidget on a skateboard and spin it then push the skateboard forward. It will spin clockwise or anticlockwise as it moves forward depending on which way it was spun. These waves both arriving at the same spin as the first wave compounding the spin. If the wave arrives at an opposite spin it becomes a Z boson. Cancelling the sideways spin completely and hurtling straight forward. So we end up with roughly 2/3 the energy of the Higgs Boson times the moments of RIK transfer. So in the Z Boson we have the 13 balls creating the accumulative 13³ x 2 waves of light entering loops. Giving us 4339 compounded again by the three moments of time dilation where RIKs are gained or lost as it travels forward. In the Z boson we get 13.67778 x 3 giving us 41.0333 x 4339 giving us approximately 178453 times the mass of an electron. The reason for 13.67778 is based on the idea that as it travels forward there are times when it's transferring connection includes the 14th RIK which squeezes in as one is released at the back. So momentarily the mass is increased to reflect that extra RIK. The W bosons are spinning around an axis which is perpendicular to the forward path either clockwise or anticlockwise so they never get hit head on when transferring RIKs, their transferring RIKs hit from an angle. So they have 4349 x (12.05779x3) =4349 x 36.1733=157318 times the mass of a single electron. The reason for the 12.05779 is based on the idea that their rotation along the perpendicular axis constantly leaves one transferring RIK almost fully extended losing kinetic energy to the field at the back.
. These figures are difficult to give exact calculations for the energy loss or gain in RIK transfer as there are so many different figures for the W and Z Bosons mass online in standard model charts, often rounded at 3 decimal points in a Gev/c² which may seem a small number but it is hundreds in Mev/c². Remember also that our observations in 3 dimensional time reflect that average mass happening within specific moments, other moments go undetected and may have other varying amounts of wobble/mass.

A correctly calibrated simulation will surely show that a perfect orbital path only happens at certain points corresponding to the inner and outer zones where electrons spin around the nucleus of each individual element. The logical assumption is that these paths intersect at certain points allowing waves as electrons to cross paths and share orbitals around other elements creating compounds. For heavier elements as the core structure becomes larger it inherently becomes less and less uniform and uneven leaving its spin unstable and its paths less able to follow symmetrically perfect orbital circuits both of which lead to energy escaping i.e. radiation.) These nuclear standard model particles clump due to the vacuum effect in the ether medium and the tightening of the TREDDs allowing short paths to move (gravitate) towards each other, this becomes surrounded by layer after layer of more tightly woven RIKs eventually forming planets, suns and at ever continuing speeds gaining momentum to become a black hole. To test this part of the theory one could build a model simulation of the field I describe on a computer. Then compact the central RIKs into the 12 kissing ball “FUB” structure and build it up from there. One should find that what began as a cube based lattice with straight paths between rows of balls immediately begins to show curvature. This will become more curved as the nucleus grows with the modeling. What one should find eventually with fine tuning and experimenting with different structures of larger objects formed by the "kissing balls" is objects that explain/make sense of the precise properties of quarks (and other subatomic standard model particles ). We should also see that the straight paths eventually curve at certain points to form perfect looped paths around the nucleus. These will correspond to the known shape and distance of electron orbitals around each elements nucleus. The size of every nucleus determines exactly where these perfect orbital loops form.

PARTICLES AT CERN BEING LOST IN DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS OF TIME.
While reading about the Higgs Boson I noticed the results of different observations of Higgs decay indicate an anomaly which can only be explained by the dimensions of space and time. The mexican hat shape and the mass both indicate that spring time theory is correct that there are indeed 3 photon waves creating the standard model particles however with decay we usually observe 2 "particles" or in one instance at least 4 muons due to 3 dimensional space and time (consistent with Einstein's Special Relativity). If the photon represents the basic wave below a certain energy moving through the field I initially thought there should be 3 waves escaping. What it shows is that the shape itself is momentarily stable until another wave hits the "hat". This is what knocks the loop paths out of sync and the waves escape and the shape collapses. The only logical explanation which can explain the apparent anomaly of usually 2 but sometimes 4 standard model particles detected escaping is that the 4th wave arrives, collides with the Higgs B and on decay two waves of energy as "particles" are usually released forward in time while two are usually sent backwards in time, in the case where 4 muons were detected upon decay of a Higgs B at the ATLAS site (shown in the image on the wikipedia page for the Higgs B [64]) it is logical that the specific angle and/or wavelength of the 4th wave arrived and sent all 4 travelling forward in space and time. I predict that we should also see the Higgs B decay into 3 standard model particles or one occasionally and perhaps on a very rare occasion into none as all 4 waves are lost in other dimensions of time. This is consistent with Einstein's law of special relativity. Why? Objects travelling outside our frame of reference seem to slow down and stop as we move away from them and approach the speed of light. Once we exceed the speed of light we will see nothing. No single object can exceed the speed of light but the combined speed of 2 travelling away from each other can. A photon travelling away from us at the speed of light will disappear from our detectable reality/range if we are stationary or travelling any speed in the opposite direction which combined with the photon moving backwards in space and time exceeds the speed of light. Of course the photons still exist in "universal time" but they are now outside our reality. This can be proven easily if we can send a standard model particle that we can identify backwards in time to disappear from our reality, have a deflection instrument already setup in the past so when the "particle" hits that deflection it bounces back towards us and we can "catch" it as it comes back into our frame of reference. Sounds like science fiction? In fact it is not we do it every day when we look in a mirror and we have a high tech experiment setup on the moon which does it regularly. The mirror we look at was setup in the past and some of the light bouncing back would usually move away from us never to enter our reality again but in the mirror it seems to. Even if we hold a mirror as we watch every "particle" of light we are experiencing ourselves as we were in the past, that light sent from an event we experience as the present, which was located in the future relevant to our brains detection centre. Sent back in time to our detection centre from the future so the emitting event then becomes our past, perhaps a few femtoseconds but in the past nonetheless, the reason we can see it is for two reasons first because using our consciousness we adjust our time focus to register the light returning at a location in our brains which is further back in space and time from the light which was sent from a location in the future relative to our minds. So while it appears like the same time we know this is impossible we must be "seeing" the image which was sent from the future. What we are doing is we are setting a time bandwidth to record that image and adjust it in our minds using perhaps femtoseconds to appear like the present in our experience. The fact we have hearts means we pulsate constantly and the fact our bodies vibrate at known frequencies and the fact everything around us vibrates and the Earth itself wobbles slightly means the mirror constantly moves towards and away from us in microscopic distances all the time so we constantly have some images coming towards us in space and time some moving away which we never see. The variation is so slight we register the light coming from a source which is moving towards us in space and time in our consciousness as "the present". The light not returning is in fact irrelevant we build the image with what we have. To visualise this imagine we are standing beside a child's car tyre swing bouncing a ball off it. It will bounce back towards us if the swing is moving towards us, if it is swinging away from us and we throw the ball at the same speed the ball will usually bounce off weakly and not come back to us but fall on the ground in between us and the swing..unless xxxx xxxxx who had months of my work destroyed on youtube is sitting on the swing in which case the ball will always hit him right in the face...hard...every time and we won't care if it rebounds back or not. The solution to the double slit experiment (paired with this paper) shows that the speed of thought/conscious waves are phenomenally faster than the speed of light so if we were experiencing time in every moment without adjusting the time bandwidth in our consciousness we would never see our reflection in a mirror.

During the Apollo missions (1969-1972) mirrors were placed on the moon [62] to measure the distance the Earth was moving away from the Earth.. [70]The mirrors placed on the moon should show that we have the same or almost the same number of photons returning to the detection device in relation to photons sent when the moon is travelling towards us in space and time. Conversely we should have less photons arriving back at the detection device in relation to photons sent when it is moving away from us in space and time.  https://youtu.be/HUgwM1Ky228   This should be easily verifiable by sending single identifiable photons towards the reflectors on the moon. For example if the moon is directly above Nairobi and we send 1 million photons towards the moon over the course of 10 minutes from New York, where the moon is moving closer in space and time, we should detect 1 million or very close to 1 million coming back (allowing for the occasional unaccounted for wobble, perhaps from a moon quake or a small gravitational wave) if however at the same time we send 1 million photons towards the moon from Mount Fuji, which is moving away from the moon in space and time, over the course of 10 minutes we should detect significantly less photons arriving back. The missing ones sent backwards in time never to enter our reality again. In the ATLAS apparatus it is perhaps the phenomenal energy causing immense vibration absorbing and sending the waves back in space and time never to be detected. Just like in the swing analogy if we throw the ball at random intervals the law of averages would show that within a given time frame 2 would usually hit as the swing is moving towards us and bounce back into our hands and two would hit and bounce weakly as the swing is moving away and land on the ground. However occasionally depending on the timing of which position the swing is in regarding it's forward and backwards path we may get 3 hitting the swing as it is moving towards us and coming back and 1 hitting the ground or all 4 hitting the swing as it is moving towards us and 4 coming back or 1 hitting as it is swinging towards us coming back and 3 hitting the swing as it is moving away and hitting the ground or all 4 hitting as the swing moves away so all 4 landing on the ground. 


ELECTROMAGNETISM
It follows on logically that electromagnetism [35] is a phenomenon due to a combination of actions first the charging of batteries is where extra ether is forced into strong electron orbitals which can hold the extra pressure, the extra pressure of the medium expands the diameter of the connecting TREDDs and builds up pressure in the orbitals which are woven in a continuous network in battery material and the medium/ether is able to flow along most metals which have strong electron orbital connections also. The pressurised energy is later released when contact is made where electron orbitals touch and it passes back into and through conducting material which also have electron orbitals which connect in a continuous network. Elements which do not conduct is where the electron orbitals do not touch to form a perfect linked up network so energy cannot be passed through in streams. 

Magnets [36] are essentially pumps that pump the medium that flows through the field in at one end and out the other by the suction caused by wave rotations in electron orbitals. The waves orbiting through electron orbitals in magnetised materials rotate in one direction so pull the medium/ether which waves move through in at one pole and expel it out the other. This pulls in most metals because their electron orbitals connect creating channels/paths facilitating movement of the ether through in currents/streams, The reason other elements are not pulled in is because their electron orbitals are not touching so the medium being "pumped" in passes by and they remain relatively unaffected.
Electromagnetism is described using electron volts which I describe as the push described by mass. Ether is pressurised in electron orbitals by pushing in more ether. This either using magnetism to push in more ether like extra hosepipes might be added via inlet connections to a pipe to increase the internal flow or medium through the pipe or using kinetic pushes like sunlight hitting a solar cell causing the internal mechanism to push against the ether creating extra waves which force more ether along electric wires and into technology or to be stored in batteries. When it arrives at the device that wave pushes another mechanism which generates it's function. In batteries it is pressurised ether in electron by pushing extra ether along electron orbitals in metallic wire. When the connecting metal which the ether is pushed along is removed, the pathways are closed and the energy is stored inside looping in electron orbitals. Once connected to metal again the electron orbitals touch and waves are passes out through the ether and arrive at devices to push against mechanisms to produce the function.

FUN ELECTROMAGNETISM EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
To illustrate the effect consider an aquarium if we insert a pump any plastic objects will remain where they are as the pump passes. However any material which is saturated or has water passing through it say for example a piece of paper will be drawn towards the pump. In physics metals are saturated with ether and similar to the paper being pulled to where the water is being pulled the metals are pulled to where the ether is being pulled. This is why two magnets will repel away from each other if they have similar charges due to having a large amount of field medium being expelled, similar to if one had two water pipes shooting out water it would be hard or impossible to get the two pipes nozzles to meet. For opposite charged poles the flow causes a pulling together. 

In lightening we have mainly water and other materials which have strong connections between electron orbitals and which have had extra energy as light forced into these orbitals. The water (hydrogen and oxygen) electron orbitals in the atmosphere being saturated with energy coming from the sun which build up and when the atmospheric pressure builds matter is compacted to touch more often and release massive amounts of energy along the connections formed by the pressure of that matter creating networks of connections, on the ground where water in the soil and conducting material has built up extra electrical pressure from sunlight also. So where these two waves of energy are pressurised they both seek paths along the new connecting networks formed due to pressure. These become highly mobile with billions of excess waves being moved along newly formed connections as electron orbitals are able to touch and move massive amounts of energy in an instant, the excess resulting flow of built up energy is not released through the network but hit "bottlenecks" and are forced out to travel as free energy/light again and the vibrations of the bottlenecks impact causes massive vibration in the field causing the huge cracks of thunder. 

Skyquakes where there is thunder but no lightning is due to phenomenal amounts of photons being moved along paths but not enough resistance achieved in bottlenecks to actually release them out as free moving light again. 

CHARGE
Charge [36a] is a measure of the direction the ether is flowing due to the path of the photon and that interaction in 3 dimensional time. There are only two actions, either the wave is arriving pushing ether out or a wave has just passed and the back current pulls more ether in. This is happening trillions of times a second when the particle shape is held. When two quantum objects "particles" are emitting ether and they are aligned opposite to each other they repel each other like two pumps expelling water would. There are only two events happening but that event becomes synchronised or out of sync depending on the alignment. Hence why negative and positive act the same as each other when aligned. They are aligned opposite to each other in space and while a positively charged object is detected as emitting ether in one direction of space, when it is aligned opposite another positively charged object in space the push of the ether out is at the same time so they repel each other. When a positively charged "particle" is aligned opposite to a negatively charged particle the inflow and back current are aligned ie. the push of one happens as the other is pulling in and the two flows are unified into one which leads to the overall pull. So any two similarly charged "particles" whether negatively or positively charged are actually just reflecting the moment of push or pull defined by a clockwise or anticlockwise type spin (it is in 3 dimensions so it is slightly more complex than clockwise anticlockwise but the principle is the same.) When both are the same charge one push is synchronised to happen the same time as the other push and they repel. When they are oppositely charged the push and pull are synchronised to happen at the same time and the flow is unified between both. 

The reason there is no charge in neutrally charged particles like the neutron is where the internal path of the photon wave is such that it crosses it's own path almost immediately so the pull and push happen so fast the external pull/push is negligible and the detectable net charge remains 0 With neutrinos the oscillation is not necessarily  to do with ether moving within the particle (RIK) it is to do with the connecting threads (TREDDs) oscillations where it is due to ether there is no charge the wave is not rhythmical it is simply detected as a photon so they have no charge. A neutral "particle" like a neutron has an internal photon whose path comes back on itself in such a way so the pull and push cross over at points very close to each other giving no accumulative detected charge to the particle. It pushes and pulls effectively at the same time so no external interaction happens with any surrounding medium or "electric field". The fact they have a magnetic moment supports the assertion that there is a wave detected but is cancelled out almost immediately and before it can have any interaction with an external magnetic or electric field. "Particles" with neutral charge having those internal pathways that cross on each other virtually instantly lose momentum rather rapidly as the internal wave gets constantly divided and thus weakened and soon cannot hold the shape of the loop and decay.

FUN CHARGE EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
If we have balls being thrown between players in 2 teams both teams stand in a circle and throw the balls along the outside in one direction say ten players in each team with five balls in each team. If they are standing in a gym and we tie the gym teacher to the ceiling so she can only look down what she sees is two circles throwing balls either clockwise or anticlockwise. If they try to synchronise the flow of the balls between teams what happens? If they are both passing the ball clockwise or anticlockwise every time relative to the teachers view, when they try to pass a ball between teams at the intersection the balls will hit each other every time and bounce off each other falling outwards in random directions and the flow does not transfer between teams. This is because while they are passing in the same clock direction the transfer point between the teams means where they meet they will have opposite head on directions. The balls hit each other and fall rather than join flow, the game stops every time so so the two loops do not merge, they repel, in the gymit is no fun, the game has no attraction. When one team is passing the ball clockwise and the other passing it anticlockwise relative to the teacher they can easily pass the ball into the other team and at the same time receive the ball from the other team because now while the direction of the balls around the circle is in opposite clock directions where they meet to pass balls the direction of the flow becomes momentarily aligned and the balls move across between teams and into a different clock direction easily and the players keep the game flowing. It is great fun and the attraction is there to keep playing. In the particles the loop is created and intensifies the energy creating a strong connection.

PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT
The photoelectric effect [35A] is a clear example which demonstrates that photons are waves detected inside the field that collectively produce all effects. The photon in the effect hits an electron orbital in a metal at a low frequency and it is absorbed by the electron orbital. If it arrives at a certain frequency or higher it is deflected back into the field with increased energy from the momentum of knocking off the electron orbital's wave and passing through the field twisting the RIKs as it now moves with added force causing mass hence detected as an electron. The light must be below a certain wavelength to be absorbed by the  electron orbital  Once absorbed it can move through the metal as it is conductive material and it either increases the charge or heat emmitted by the metal or both. Or if it has enough energy it is deflected with added momentum from the force of the electron orbitals energy and deflected back into the field as an electron.  Just like any revolving object it must be approached below certain energies, usually defined by speeds for something to grip and stay on. If it arrives above a certain speed it will not attach and be flung off with any added energy from the transferred momentum of the rotating object.


FUN PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT AND COLOURS EXAMPLES FOR ALL AGES
To visualise this imagine running towards a carousel at a funfair or a spinning roundabout in a playground or if a person runs and jumps at a carousel they must do it at a certain speed, if they arrive too fast they will be unable to get a grip of anything to hold onto and will be flung off swiftly. In the photoelectric effect this grip is at the electron orbital. If the light is below a certain energy it can grip and join the fun spinning around the atom. If it arrives at a higher energy it can't grip and gets sent flying back out.This is partly why we can see different colours. The atoms are spinning at different energies so light bounces off objects at different energies and we see those energies as different colours. Black is like where the roundabout is spinning with low energy so everyone can get a grip and stay on enjoying the fun even the toddlers and grandma. White is like where the teenagers have made it spin really fast and everybody who tries to jump on can't grip so get flung off again at high speed/energy. All the colours in between are like where some can grip while others can't and we see different colours like people sent flying at different speeds. Well strictly speaking it's more like Grandma and the toddlers trying to hop on a roundabout with low speed(energy) but still unable to grip so the roundabout has to be stopped, in one dimensional time this is impossible, the electron orbital keeps going but Grandma and the wickkle toddlers really wanted a go on the roundabout and they're so adorable I used my unique understanding of 3 dimensional time (wink) to stop time for an instant and let them on. 

These dynamics at play in the photoelectric effect also help explain what is happening in   polarising filters . For example when we send light through polarising filters what we are doing is affecting the frequency of the waves. All waves still pass through but increasingly less are detected when a second filter is turned a specific angle with the maximum filtration at  90° to the first  filter leaving only  a fraction of the original light detected. This is because the light is hitting and rebounding off the electron orbitals in the lens material at different angles or to be more precise passing the electron orbital while it is in a different orientation. If it arrives from a direction similar to the electron orbital spin(remember this is different from "spin" in quantum mechanics which I call "twist") then the wave is partly absorbed, similar to how a footballer slows a fast moving ball by waiting for the ball to arrive then as the ball arrives at her foot she moves her foot in the same direction the ball is moving absorbing its momentum and slowing it down, or jumping on a carousel if we jump on after approaching from the same direction of its spin we can usually remain on or get flung off at a similar speed that we arrive with.  In the quantum realm the wave is not fully absorbed. Some of the wave remains and travels forward but is now outside the visible light spectrum. When it then hits the third lens it hits at angles against the spin of the electron orbital rather than with it, like someone trying to jump on a carousel against the direction of spin rather than with it, they get flung off at high speed/energy. This increases the energy of many of the waves again which are then back within the visible light spectrum again and detected as increased light passing the third lens. It is vital that the dynamics of time must also be incorporated into the mathematical computation.  Because while a wave passes a RIK in one part of a wave oscillation passing through the same lens surface the same wave passing through the adjoining RIKs in the same macro time unit will pass in the quantum realm in a different part of the wave oscillation. The first wave may pass the measured RIK with its peak hitting the lens first and the neighbouring parts of the wave pass in the same macro time but in the macro realm they pass with their troughs hitting the lens first. It must be 3 dimensional because every oscillation is not a simple up and down event. There is tension between the TREDDs pulling at different strengths as the waves get propagated forward so each RIK bounces up and down, left and right, forwards and back as each wave passes. The overall direction of the wave is determined by which part of the movement imparts the most energy. Sometimes it will be directly forward sometimes it will be slightly more to the left or right, sometimes slightly more up than down and the overall forward moving wave is equalised by the pull of the other RIKs sending energy in other directions. So overall the path is maintained in equilibrium through 3 dimensional space and 3 dimensional time along a forward axis at any given point.  That is where I must leave it  for now for the mathematicians to work on the exact dynamics and what else they may reveal/hint at however the theory seems common sense, robust logic to me.

SURFACE TENSION AND Sonoluminescence.
Surface tension in liquids are caused by these electron orbitals also. The immense suction of the negative energy in the wave's wake passing through the ether pulls all the electron orbitals together at the surface creating that tight skin like effect.
When sound waves are passed through water or other fluids at certain volume and frequencies they collapse bubbles and light is emitted along with heat at thousands of degree Celsius [60]. This being where the passing sound vibrations momentarily change the angle of electron orbitals in the fluid breaking the binding pathways between those electron orbitals which cause surface tension. With the breaking of the bond releasing huge amounts of energy as light/heat from these loops in an instant [59].Perhaps explaining the reported spontaneous human combustion as specific vibrations knock massive amounts of nuclear energy out of loops within the body? That was probably some really bad or disharmonised vibes those guys were generating, so we are warned, keep it positive dudes! 

SUPERFLUIDITY
With superfluidity [65] we have gas or other bosons condensed to extremely low temperatures acting as liquids but with zero viscosity, ie. they dont form collective shapes like droplets or pools each molecule moves independently. Which means their electron orbitals are not touching so each molecule is in a sense moving freely. When they appear to defy gravity by flowing upwards along the sides of containers they are not in fact defying gravity. They are using "lateral gravity". Water attempts to use lateral gravity to climb up the sides of containers also but because of their electron orbitals touching they are held together and cannot break free to climb. How can they climb? Using spring time theory we see that gravity is not a force as such it is a mechanism of the field. This forces electron orbitals along the path of least resistance which is where the angles between TREDDs is the smallest. This is usually on the surface of large objects like planets. However any solid object has millions/billions/trillions of atoms clumped together so their surface also pulls in TREDDs. With superfluidity what is happening is that with no surface tension the atoms in the superfluid are able to move independently along the paths where the connecting TREDDs angles are smallest. This is usually on the surface of the large celestial objects but any object also pulls in the TREDDs to smaller angles. So sometimes they are at ground level but sometimes they are perpendicular or at angles greater or less than 90' to ground level if the object is dense enough. In superfluidity when the object is near or touching the ground the space between quantum strands is affected by both plus the pull of the density of the supercooled superfluid. The atoms then move not necessarily towards the ground but to where the TREDDs connecting angles are least. So this can be up along sides. The atoms of the superfluid itself causing a pull on the field narrowing the angle on connections forcing atoms upwards along surfaces. When the density of the superfluid has been equalised between two separate containers the angle of connections in the field are equalised so there is no more a mechanism for movement. Once the angles between TREDDs has been equalised the superfluid no longer moves as it is now at the point of least resistance. 

FUN SUPERFLUIDITY/LATERAL GRAVITY EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
imagine we have a play den full of hyperactive toddlers all in great shape and full of energy after eating their fill of super ripe mangoes. They are great climbers and can climb ladders easily but not ropes so are still a bit afraid to climb up ropes. There is a section in the play den with 2 rooms whose walls are made of strong elastic netting. one room is in the middle of the bigger room so the kids enter the inner room via a hole in the floor. In order to get into the larger room they must climb over the walls. But there's a problem. The distance between the elastic strands is variable. The structure holding the elastic netting is also variable, it consists of 4 vertical columns connected by 4 horizontal columns at the top in a cube shape. The vertical columns have springs inside so with pressure exerted on them they become compacted and the distance between the elastic strands of the netting on the 4 walls' netting is shortened. Usually the toddlers will climb along the floor as they can reach the strands but with the columns at full height the distance between the horizontal lines of the elastic in the wall is beyond their reach so they wont climb and remain on the floor. Sometimes some kids are very anxious and when they see another kid try to climb the walls even when they can reach horizontal strands they panic thinking their little climbing buddys will lose grip and fall and so they hold onto any who try to climb to protect them (surface tension). Not today, today these toddlers are super cool, super confident and full of energy. Not least because their big brothers and sisters are with them. The bigger kids climb up onto the top of the cube their mass/weight means the vertical columns are forced down on the springs ( symbolising lateral gravity, the gravity caused by the sides of cups or tubes having narrower angles due to their denstity being greater than the surrounding field). Now the horizontal lines are brought closer together, these kids can reach the horizontal lines and so they do what super cool kids do, they go for maximum fun and nobody is holding anyone back. They climb up and over the walls and into the other room to play also. After a while due to the law of equilibrium they are fairly equally distributed playing in both rooms. 

The Bose Einstein Condensate is where bosons are cooled so low (slowed down so slow) that we can actually see their movement reveal the waves in the ether as they move through the field. 


THE SPEED OF LIGHT
Using Spring Time Theory we can explain why the speed of light [37] is constant and why so even with change of frequency. Using the spring mechanism all matter affects the quantum field the spring/time field. If light is traveling towards us through the spring like quantum field our movement affects the spring mechanism, if we are moving towards it we compress the spring mechanism, if we are moving away we stretch the spring mechanism, so the path distance of light through the springs remains constant. Altogether the same path length. This is how I realised there was an ether. As matter is made of vibrations passing through the field they couldn't of themselves explain the constant speed of light. If pure vibrations were travelling towards or away from light as ripples then the speed would be different, light would in such a case reach an object faster when combined with the vibrations/objects' approaching speed, if it is travelling away then light should hit the vibrations/object with decreased speed. So for example if we are the object I realised there must be something pushing against and slowing down light coming towards us and conversely something pulling it faster towards us as we move away from light. So I realised there must be a medium through which light travels inside the field. Upon study I learned that ancient philosophers hypothesized an ether in the universe a concept that gained popularity again with the discovery of the wave nature of light but this was ruled as no longer possible given Einstein's laws of relativity and the particle nature of light. Already knowing that the particle existed fixed in the field not as a separate moving entity I realised there must be a medium INSIDE the field causing a build up of pressure in the medium and subsequent slowing down of light as we travel towards it and the opposite pull on the medium causing negative pressure as we move away creating a vacuum type effect pulling light faster towards us. These 2 effects combined with the objects travelling speed maintaining the constant speed of light. 
Although recorded time slows down nearer large objects the speed of light remains constant....why? Consider it like this. Two vehicles are moving at a fixed speed along two parallel paths. One vehicle comes to a roundabout (curvature) but passes through without slowing down the other remains travelling straight so while the speed remains constant the vehicle passing through curvature loses time because its path has been made longer "stretched". Once it comes back onto a straight road the speed is the same but it has lost time. If we send an object at speed past a water vortex it will be drawn in. If it is moving fast enough its path will be changed slightly but will become straight again as it comes out of the pull of the vortex. Other objects slow enough will be drawn in and get caught in a loop spiraling in. Another example: If light is traveling towards us through the quantum field our movement affects the spring function as we have "mass" or "resistance" we affect the quantum field causing "drag" if we are moving towards it we compress the spring function whereas if we are moving away we stretch the spring function. So the path distance of light THROUGH the springs remains constant.
FUN SPEED OF LIGHT EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
To illustrate imagine we have 2 coiled hosepipes, they are empty to begin with, we turn the water on at full power at the same time, now if one hosepipe is taken and we run to the other end of a field before it comes out of the nozzle it will come out of the nozzle on the second hosepipe at exactly the same time regardless of whether it is still sitting coiled beside the tap or halfway across the field. Regarding light, if we have mass we exert compression on the quantum field while we are traveling towards the light source just like if we stand at the midfield line holding the nozzle of the hosepipe and run with it towards the tap it is connected to so the distance is less as the spring function is compacted but the water or in the space time fabric the light inside the pipes still travels the full length of the pipes. If we are travelling or running away from the light or water source we cause an expansion as the spring function is stretched so either way the path distance is the same. The detected force will be the same at either nozzle on arrival. 
The reason why light speed remains constant while there is curvature or not could be visualised again by using the water hosepipe analogy. If a hosepipe is elastic in nature then as it is being stretched its core will contract in diameter but if a vibration like a sound wave is passed through the water it will travel forward at the same speed regardless of the width of the hosepipe's core diameter but as the width contracts that wave will lose energy.


QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND TELEPORTATION  (added 25 July 2019Amended to update and amalgamate the section on teleportation with QE on 31 July 2020)
Time dimensions are key to understanding quantum entanglement [41]. When we seem to force the "particles" to align with the direction of the measurement we are not actually affecting the spin what we are doing is focusing on one instance in time. So while the energy passing through the fabric is moving wavelike in many different directions (paths) when we focus on one measurement we focus on the time "bandwidth" that gives exactly the correlation between the two "particles" . It is not that any information is passing between the " particles " to influence each other, the pathways have been set already with the entanglement, the time bandwidth we focus on determines which part of the wave we see. Just like a wave on water if the point of disturbance is a drop (in the quantum realm entanglement) the wave if measured at any two points at equal distance from the centre will show a relational movement. This is a flat surface example but entangled "particle" are of course 3 dimensional in both time and space. To further illustrate the point imagine a satellite orbits the Earth changing its path by a slight degree every orbit. At one time its orbit will be North to south traveling NESWNESWNE....etc. if we view it from the direction of the sun it appears clockwise. If the orbit of the satellite then gradually moves down facing us eventually it will be orbiting west to east as it aligns to the equator and anticlockwise as it then aligns to the poles again and east to west as it aligns to the equator next time...and so forth. If we focus on only every second orbit that is aligned to the equator and only record that orbit on film it will appear like the satellite is only orbiting east to west at the equator when the clips are put together and the film is played back (this is not describing the orbit of "particles" it is an illustration to convey the theory that we only detect events happening within specific segments of time and miss much of all that is going on in other segments ). When physicists seem to force a "particle" to align to a direction of spin they are only forcing the focus to that point in time which corresponds to that specific spin. Each twist at each moment in time will always have a twist relational to all other RIKs in the field when measured from the point of entanglement, the origin of the wave. 
It is a similar effect being observed in quantum entanglement as we have to reduce the time range to see the "particle". We know that brainwaves (consciousness) [42] have frequency ranging through gamma, alpha, beta, theta, delta and when scientists focus on the same parameters their consciousness gets tuned to the same frequency of time similar to radios being tuned to unique radio stations and the orbits or orbitals observed around "particles"  and the detected "spin"(twist) reflect only those which align to the measurement parameters focused on and these are relational in both locations no matter how far apart in space they are moved. This is NOT saying that the experimenters consciousness affects matter in quantum entanglement, it is saying which frequency or bandwidth of time they focus on determines what result they will get.
To understand quantum entanglement it is probably best to visualise the points in the field as cogs. When one RIK (a) is twisted clockwise by an energy wave passing along an x axis all the connected RIKs on the y and z axes are pulled and twisted both clockwise and anticlockwise by (a)'s twist (matter and it's opposite helicity in equal in number). This twist spreads out to every connected RIK that the wave passes through . So in quantum entanglement when the two observers view the "particles" they are focusing on a specific time bandwidth and seeing a corresponding twist relative to each other. If we were to cover a globe´s surface with cogs fitting perfectly snug to each other as one cog turns it will turn every other cog on the globe one way or the other and each cog turn will always be relational to all others when measured from the source of the turn in this case the globe central core point. Another way to view quantum entanglement is if we view a 2 dimensional comparison as a "slice" or line of latitude  of a  spherical wave. To illustrate it we can compare it to a clock face, if the source of the wave travels out equally in every direction from the centre of the clock face then any two points will be relational when measured. If the wave travels out and we measure it from a central point then if we have digits going around clockwise numbered 12, 01,02,03..........10,11 ending back at 12 again. Now if we measure the wave from the mid point, being the vertical line dividing the left and right sides of the clock, then if we focus on the 1 in 12 then it's relational partner will be the 2 in 12, in the field with an opposite twist (spin) like two cogs beside each other. If we look at the 1 in 10 when we look for it's relational entangled partner it will be at the 2 in 02. If we look at the left 1 in 11 it's relational opposite twisting partner will be the 1 in 01 etc.
The hidden variable is 3 dimensional time. The  fact that Bell's theorem proves that  "Consequently, the only way that hidden variables could explain the predictions of quantum physics is if they are "nonlocal", somehow associated with both halves of the pair and able to carry influences instantly between them no matter how widely the two halves are separated." is now clear. the error here is the conclusion that it must be something physical which is influencing the outcome because these physicists were focusing solely on the quantum physical dynamics. The reality is the observers are the physical bodies influencing the results. There is locality in the consciousness of all observers of reality which seems to be instant regardless of the limitations of space and time. That is, all observers focused on the same dynamics/conscious wavelengths are connected in thought/consciousness which transcends space. Thoughts travel faster than light. It appears it travels instantly regardless of the limitations of physical space. Consciousness is local at any two or more places in the universe when these conscious beings are aligned in focus.  I came across a lecture by Ron Garret at google (on 1st August 2020) where he shows that the mathematical equation for quantum entanglement is exactly the same as the equation for measurement. This is exactly what I have been saying for almost a year, that it is the conscious act of measuring that focuses the time bandwidth and gives the correlation between the two parts of the wave, one of many possible specific viewpoints narrowed down to one upon measurement. The lecture is on https://youtu.be/dEaecUuEqfc and the essential point with the mathematical formulae  hit on the head between around 35 to 39 minutes in the video. 

The assumption that there is nothing linking entangled particles across "empty space" is a mistake. STT shows that all parts of the universe are linked by the field. So when physicists use entangled particles to teleport information from one location to another the dynamics of both are affected by BOTH time and space. Looking at Anton Zeilinger's teams work teleporting photons between different Canary islands [67] when the second photon is brought in to affect one of the original entangled photons the wave that the added photon is representative of also travels out and affects the second entangled particle in the distant location. When we tune into the time bandwidth of that added photon we also tune into the same time bandwidth on the distant island and we detect the same wave but in effect it is detected as a separate photon. However because the photon added at the first location is also determined by the laws of entanglement it's corresponding partner detected at the distant location must have the exact relative opposite properties of spin dependant on direction and angle, so when detected as affecting the original photon at the distant location the interaction will be the reverse of the first interaction bringing the final wave at the second location to be exactly the same as the state of the second photon added at the first location, in a sense like two double negatives applied across space from one location to another. Making it appear like the particle has teleported but in fact it is only the energy that has affected the field particles/RIKs because like all matter and light that's all they are...energy. The time bandwidth is also affected so while the focus is on the bandwidth of time affecting the new "teleported" particle detected at it's wave peak at the distant location the wave at the first location is always at it's trough within the same time bandwidth so is never detected although it is always there.  While spooky action at a distance will work instantly regardless of distance teleportation is limited by C. This is theoretically testable by running the experiment using a computer set in the Earths orbit or on the moon perhaps using the technology applied by Chinese physicists doing teleportation into space [38]. We will surely find that measuring for entanglement gives the expected results instantly regardless of time but for example teleporting a photon from the location on the Canary islands to the moon will need time for the added photon wave to arrive and change the original entangled photon because the wave can only travel at the speed of light.  So in effect it is not true teleportation as such it is more like taking the vibration made at one location and reproducing it in another. So theoretically it would not be possible to teleport living beings as there are so many vibrations happening within a living organism with moving parts it would simply be impossible. It would be infinitely more difficult than trying to swim from one shore of a river to a point directly facing your position on the opposite shore through intense white water rapids. What would be possible though in theory has two possibilities. The vibrations of matter of simple non living structures which usually travel out undetected in all directions in 3 ,dimensional time could theoretically be "caught" if time can be manipulated, giving the possible explanation as to why it may have been possible for Jesus to multiply the loaves and fishes. If he could manipulate time he could bring or hold those vibrations in a time range within our detectable range of time our  detectable "spectrum of experience", which is theoretically as logical as manipulating matter which we do all the time. Because the bread and flesh was not living the majority of the vibrations could be held but any living organisms within the tissue like bacteria would not be reproduced. The difference would be so insignificant it would have no effect on the overall taste or texture just as people having private conversations at a rock concert would not be reproduced in any live sound recording of that concert. The added bonus for Christians is  the knowledge that Jesus would not have been giving anyone "unclean food" so he would not have been in breach of any possible kosher regulations stipulated within the Torah   What is also theoretically possible using this reality is that the patterns of vibration could be recreated in a sense like taking a recording of music and reproducing it's patterns in another place by playback on amplified gadgets like CD or mp3 players or by reproducing the individual vibrations and reproducing them in different ways similar to electronic keyboards reproducing vibrations similar to acoustic instruments. This also would be extremely difficult and such technology would likely take centuries to develop but theoretically it is very possible. 

FUN QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND TELEPORTATION  EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
If we have a group of toy electric boats in the very centre of a large round lake all pointing towards the edge of the lake. Each boat has 3 flashing lights red, blue and yellow and each light flashes for one second then off for half a second then the next colour. These are synchronised to flash at exactly the same time in the same sequence. Then all are driven by their controllers at equal speed towards the shore. One would expect that any two observers would see exactly the same colour flash if they look at exactly the same time. If they shout across to one another "what colour is your boat flashing now?" The chances that the colours are the same are probabilistic, that is they are likely to be flashing different colours depending on how far away the observers are because sound travels slower than light so by the time the second observer hears the question the colour is not certain to be the same colour it may be any of the three depending on the distance. But if any two observers have a mobile phone and are talking while watching every time and they ask each other what colour is flashing now by saying "now!" Then every time one says "Now!" The other observer responds with the exact same colour as the first observer sees all the time because the speed of the phone signal is virtually instant. Or if they synchronise their watches to the second and they agree to write down the colour that flashes at given times say every 20 seconds. Then when they compare notes they will always see the same colour flashed in both boats regardless of what subsequent route the boats take on their journey. In quantum entanglement what puzzled physicists for so long was they could not understand how the boats could show the same signal when it took time to send a signal between the boats. The answer was the boats were never sending any signals they were just doing what they were set up to do, it was the humans who were sending the signals using thought. The physicists were using consciousness in the experiment but without realising/or not believing that consciousness would affect the result so not counting it as a factor. In this analogy the speed of sound is demonstrating the speed of light in the experiment and the speed of the mobile phone signal is demonstrating the speed of thought and/or the synchronisation of thought. In other words when two observers focus on exactly the same instances of time they get exactly the same results.Regarding teleportation to illustrate the lights flashing on the boats we can compare adding the second particle to the original entangled photon as if we sent a remote control signal to the first boat and changed the sequence.of the lights, however because that signal is three dimensional it also spreads out, hits and affects the sequence of the lights on all the other boats so the sequence timings are all changed but still maintaining the preset sequence order which will be perfectly in or out of sync always consistent with the original settings and start of movement in time. 
An interesting twist of teleportation is that in theory in future we could perhaps use waves of energy to make some relatively simple compounds like sugars, proteins and starches. So if we run out of flour and jam/jelly as we fly through space in a spaceship someday and we get the munchies we can get some energy from the light of a star we are passing, turn on the teleport machine, put in some numbers which correspond to the recipe for a sweet pancake mix (similar to how we put some numbers into a computer and it makes a copy of a film for us to watch) make some delicious sweet mix and make pancakes from nothing but numbers and the light just as we create photons using machines. Whether we can ever truly teleport our consciousness to a distant location is a big question which my evidence says we cannot, If it turns out in future that we can get around the problem of moving parts in living bodies then  we may transport a body but whether it would be my soul in that body is very unlikely and as the wise physicist John Clauser whose failure to understand quantum mechanics led to the successful testing of Bell's theorem says " I wouldn't step into that machine!" [67]  not me either. 

TEST OR THOUGHT EXPERIMENT FOR QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT TIME BANDWIDTH THEORY (Added 29 July 2019 removed and reinserted on 30 July 2019)
To test this theory of quantum entanglement one possibility may be to have two or more observations at each location, three is probably a good number. These would be performed at exactly the same time by one team for each orientation but with each observer observing the action measured against a different orientation. Each team of observers aware of their distant partners orientation but unaware of the other two teams of observers selected orientation. The results should see each team have corresponding spin and orientation along its selected orientation for the entangled "particles" yet each result for each team would be different than the other two. Although recorded at the same time as we know it each team would be witnessing the "particles" act in different bandwidths of the time dimensions: The bandwidth that correspond to the measurements they are focusing on. I'm not sure how this could be setup but the theory is robust logic and like many thought experiments from the past which were considered impossible at the time this too may become possible as technology advances.
GRAVITATIONAL WAVES (Added 21st Aug)
Gravitational waves are the actual ripple of the space time fabric being stretched just as any fabric structure like spider webs for example send ripples from disturbances. Whether it is binary pulsars [43] tugging at each other or as a star becomes a supernova before accelerating into a black hole. The spin accelerates so fast it pulls in the space time fabric faster than the speed of light so light can no longer travel out. The supernova already known about impacting inwards scattering increased light out in all directions and shaking the space time fabric causing the ripples to also travel out across the field in every direction. The waves being ripples of vibration of the fabric itself travel faster than the light which travels through it. Or it may be where a highly combustible object arriving at the star impacts or explodes at a critical angle to the spin causing it to either speed up or slow down. Explaining fast radio bursts where the incoming object knocks out phenomenal amounts of trapped light in an instant but in the same instant speeds up the star's spin faster than the speed of light trapping all remaining light in a black hole.  For quasars I predict that the jets of light coming out from it's central black hole are actually not coming out of the black hole itself but it is the space time fabric being spun at phenomenally fast speeds causing the fabric to twist into compact lines along the axis of the spin creating intense frictional vibration as the RIKs in these strands of space time are twisted and banged together in linear strands due to the drag of the spin, these generating light where the RIKs in the field are compressed together and knock against each other with incredible energies creating energy waves. This may eventually be verified by analysing the light from quasars "jets" of light which I predict to be different in nature than those from inside stars, it is not a release of photons as such it is the creation of new waves of photons created by this phenomenal amount of kinetic energy. So according to STT this light is not as a result of nuclear reactions nor light expelled from the quasar itself but rather light emitted by kinetic energy creating photon waves as RIKs in the field knock against each other and the resulting waves spreading out from these interacting strands of spacetime.

Hawking radiation while an interesting theory is incorrect. As pairs of particles are different representations of the same wave and all parts of any wave producing particles with mass will be drawn into a black hole. The only thing that can escape a black hole event horizon is kinetic energy in the form of ripples detected as neutrinos on small scales and gravitational waves on large scales. Light can avoid total consumption and continue moving forward as long as it is just outside the event horizon because strictly speaking light is not slowed down or pulled by gravity only it's path is affected and pulled in by gravity while objects with mass are slowed down and pulled inwards by gravity because they incorporate more than one thread of spacetime and move along the path of least resistance. The path of least resistance is where the angle between the threads of spacetime is least which is invariably at the surface of supermassive objects. So the theory that black holes can evaporate over time is very unlikely unless they eat all the matter available and cease to gain mass. Incredibly unlikely as the universe is full of so much gas, asteroids, planets etc and the loss of kinetic energy is so slight.  Such an evaporation of a black hole due to the loss of energy over time would be comparable to the loss of gas from the Earths upper atmosphere leading to the gradual evaporation of the Earth itself. It is simply illogical, with so much gravity the growth in mass with the addition of interstellar gas and meteorites for example would always be greater than the loss. What is more likely is that they keep growing to become quasars and so large that they reach that point of resistance in the spacetime fabric and begin to slow down like an elastic that is being wound near its maximum stretch. This releasing a whole galaxy's worth of light in an instant as soon as it's spin slows down below the speed of light again. 
The event horizon only applies to light because it is the path of light that is affected by gravity, light itself is not affected by gravity it always moves forward at C but will be detected to arrive from different locations if it's path has been bent, as we see with localised gravitational lensing around black holes. Any objects with mass (matter) however are pulled into the black hole from a distance far exceeding the distance of the event horizon. If there was any merit in the theory of Hawking radiation then there would be a point where the angular momentum decreases to the point below the speed of light and phenomenal amounts of the trapped light inside would escape rather than "evaporate" slowly as low energy radiation over a long period of time. But there is no merit, it is simply incorrect, the only energy escaping is kinetic energy via ripples in the fabric itself. The phenomena of fast radio bursts logically is where the spin of black holes momentarily dips below the speed of light, due to resistance in the spacetime fabric perhaps from the opposite spin of a powerful star, or smaller black hole being drawn close. Once the object has been overpowered however it's mass is absorbed and with other matter constantly being eaten as small planets, asteroids, gas etc their forward momentum adds to the momentum of the spin of the black hole which then instantly increases beyond the speed of light again effectively turning off the visibility of the light again. 

HIGH AND ULTRA HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS (added 4 Aug 2020)
Using STT the theory that high and ultra high energy cosmic rays have been travelling at this speed for long periods after being emitted from distant stars or supernovae is incorrect.  This false idea is due to the failure to understand that the spacetime fabric is a physical lattice and the the popular incorrect belief that mass is not due to resistance. So what is happening is the protons have been emitted by supernova or flung out by slowed down black holes or quasars  perhaps even from our own sun and travelled towards us through space at their normal maximum speed much slower than the speed of light but in the moment just before when they are detected what is happening is that for high energy cosmic rays they are hit by an incredibly high energy electromagnetic wave (high energy gamma photons) which cannot enter the tight loop of the protons but momentarily pushes these protons forward against the spacetime fabric or for ultra high energy cosmic rays a gravitational wave passes, pushes them forward momentarily significantly beyond their normal speed. Similar in principle to how a surfer paddling her board at her maximum effort is moving forward at limited speed but once a wave big enough arrives she will be lifted and moved much faster than her normal speed. So the detection of these high and ultra high cosmic rays are rare depending on the energy of the waves hitting the protons, their original speed and direction they were travelling when the wave hit. If they were travelling in the opposite direction to the wave they would be slowed down possibly even pushed back to change direction and  move forward at various different sometimes incredibly slow speeds significantly below their normal speed rather than reach a temporary near light speed. The likelihood of finding them is very slim because it is dependent on detecting them at that moment when the passing wave temporarily increases their speed hence why they are detected relatively rarely compared to other protons detected travelling through "space". 

SPIN AND LEFT HANDED CHIRALITY (Added Nov 22)
Why left handed and right handed spin are different and our experience is that left handed chirality [45] is preferred. If a person tries to jump onto a carousel they will land safely if they approach at a similar speed and direction as the carousel. If they try to jump aboard at the same speed but from a direction opposite the spin of the carousel they will be flung off very violently due to the opposite momentum. The interaction we see is "particles" arriving from the same direction as the spin thereby being absorbed while those arriving against the spin are repelled. This is surely obvious to physicists but why this should be biased towards left handed spin is not so obvious.
This paragraph is purely theoretical postulation (perhaps waffle) 
It has been said our universe prefers left handed spin, this can perhaps be better understood by understanding time dimensions. While we have left and right handed spin in equal number in "particles" with Spring Time Theory it is logical to propose that we have both left and right handed instances in time. When these are both observed organically we see the full picture, just as light and dark together allow us experience vision, they allow computers work etc. when observed or analysed in a lab setting we can only see one spin at a time due to the limitations of time in observations. This is easily understood using the classical backward spinning wagon wheels on the old spaghetti westerns or any wheels recorded on film. Because the frame speed during recording is different than the speed of the wheels rotation at certain speeds the exposure rate captures the images which correspond to a different sequence making it look like the vehicle is moving forward while the wheels appear to be turning backwards. For us left handed chirality could be a matter of bias, because we are focused on the left handed instances of time we miss the right. Just as right handedness is the predominant mode of writing for humans our predominant mode of focus on time during scientific analysis is towards left handed time. Polar time can be described as one pull forward one pull back in time alternating at incredibly small intervals. All together we get the forward momentum in time. Hence our focus has a bias towards one pole of time. I would term these 2 alternating poles in time Alpha time and Omega time alpha being the segment which produces the push forward and omega being the pull back towards the past coming second. These two poles of time alternating eternally through space and time giving two interpretations as to why time moves forward. First interpretation is that our focus is on the future giving a left handed bias in observations with focus on calculating or assessing the best moves to make and advance through the future, less focus on the past because it takes less thought and energy due to being imprinted in our memory and DNA while the future is more uncertain and takes much more energy and calculations because unlike the past the future will affect us in a real way. Secondly that the momentum of time is intrinsically forward moving giving the Alpha pole a slightly longer time span than the Omega pole leading to an overall forward moving time giving more time to focus on left handed spin. A third interpretation is that the TREDDs in spacetime are as a result of these strands of spring being twisted around in a double helix similar to DNA [46]. This would tend to be universal so that strands are either wound up clockwise or anticlockwise and it would also further help to explain why photons don´t interact when they meet head on. Just as a motorway/highway has two way traffic, all vehicles drive on either the right or left.
Or it may be that male energies at work in experiments get results which correspond to left handed helicity. Female energies give a view that give results which correspond to right handed helicity. Perhaps when we get all female teams running experiments with women doing everything from setting up the experiment to making the coffee, manning the security and driving yhe delivery vehicles we will get a predominantly right handed helicity in results.0 As odd and perhaps unlikely as this may seem, funny enough I think it is probably the correct answer. (https://youtu.be/Pu1aQvm5MrU)

ANTIMATTER
Regarding matter and anti matter [20] as Spring Time Theory shows every particle is actually a vibrating/oscillating particle in the field with internal waves. Antimatter is the first twist back of the RIKs when the wave enters. These are so strong they appear to be essentially the same particle but exactly opposite in shape and form. These happen only in particles where the wave loops internally and causes the twist /spin hence why the photon and any other particle with no charge or spin is it's own antiparticle. It is due to the twist of the wave passing through the RIKs. When the RIK/s twist back they give us the antiparticle. The reason there is so little antimatter located in experiments is that the focus is predominantly on the main oscillation and in one dimension of time. Perhaps best compared with an echo in a song, if the song is relatively quiet (like small "particles") say just a single voice we can notice an echo effect that is applied, however with many instruments and melodies playing it becomes increasingly difficult to locate when an echo is applied. 

I just realised I should mention that when I realised I might be talking to Mick Hucknall that doesn't mean I am only talking to him, I'm still primarily talking to my fictional mate Mick and any other Micks reading this paper, and of course other people who are reading it who are not even called Mick (apart from Xxxxx Xxxxxx who I'm not speaking to because he had my youtube channel deleted using false information dismissing Newton's and Einstein's incredible work because I showed how they provide evidence that the big bang/outwards expanding universe model is incorrect , you @€&@€ Xxxxx that's not cool, (Well I obviously am speaking to him now but just to tell him I'm not speaking to him, even though I am...just to clarify)if you are reading this your name isn't on my celebratory party list, that is if I live to see this Theory break the big bang barrier and have a party, and a list for that party and I knew your name). 
CHARGE PARITY VIOLATION
With CP violation the assumption that particles would be emitted randomly in any direction is incorrect. If the "particles" have a spin or twist towards the left it is only possible to eject those particles in the same direction as the twist. Because it is a twist and not a full spin the sub particles can only be emitted on one side. Like if we have a canon on a boat it can swing left and right up and down but because it can't spin only twist it will fire out one general direction. If is attached back to back with another canon and both twist along the same central vertical axis both will only fire forward away from the boat within the range of the twist. Or to use the child's swing analogy again, if we sit on a swing and throw a ball out (we will let Xxxx Xxxxx do this one because he is probably feeling a bit picked on now) so if Xxxx throws out a ball at the same speed as the swing is moving it will only go forward beyond the swing if it is thrown while the swing is moving in the same direction as the swing. If it is thrown forward while the swing is moving backwards it will not go outside the range of the swing itself
So charge is dependant on 3 dimensions of time as well as 3 of space because if it were dependant only on 3 dimensions of space the charge would vary depending on the direction/orientation of the magnet. So it is highly likely that the different dimensions of time also affect the phenomenon. Given that careful analysis of the double slit experiment shows that time and matter have an inverse relationship (verified by experimental evidence found in videos from work done by Akira Tonomura at Hitachi, physicists at Lincoln Nebraska University and the results of the which way detection all explained in the double slit experiment page) So when we rotate an object in space we also rotate it's existence in time with equal measure in the opposite direction of the relevant time dimensions.

To use a different explanation,  first be cognisant of the fact that positive or negative charge is in fact the same thing but detected and interacting as positive or negative when measured within different orientations of time.
CP violation is due to slight variations in the path loops within atomic nuclei. Using STT the weak force decay of atoms is due to irregularities in the nuclei leading to the path of photons moving within loops) losing perfect closed loops and those photons escaping. They eventually come to a point in the spacetime fabric where the loop breaks and they are released to travel straight forward away from the atom. The direction they leave and travel away from the atom is determined by the state of twist (spin) the atom is in, the ability to detect that state of twist is determined by the bandwidth of time that we measure in.  They will be flung out in the same direction as the twist just like a person will be flung out from a carousel in the same direction that it is spinning. Using STT we see that a "particle" will twist forward and backwards north/south/east/west and all sub opposites (SE/NW etc) around a relative axis. As physical matter in the macro realm is actually made up of an equal amount of opposite twist(spin) antimatter and matter, we have equal mounts of matter corresponding to "the range of the first twist" and antimatter corresponding to "the range of the second twist". What we detect however is dependent on the moments correspondng to the dimensions of time that the particle is emitted in. It is logical to assume that there is equal amounts of radiation emitted in all directions but we only detect those emitted in the dimensions of time that we focus on which is usually detected as matter. However the twist is not perfectly symmetrical relative to time  so we actually detect some photons emitted in the opposite direction to what we expect while the particle is in it's antimatter twist(spin) in a sense similar to how the Earth is not perfectly pivoted on the poles  relative to the sun it is at a slight angle. So while a stone thrown directly up at the North pole will usually be seen to be thrown slightly towards the sun at midday for half of the year from spring to autumn when the pole is oriented towards the sun. Once autumn comes however the pole is now pointing slightly away from the sun so the stone will still be detected for a few days but being thrown slightly away from the direction of the sun until it moves closer to  winter  and the Earth is titled away from the sun so the pole and the stone being thrown is no longer visible. Although the stone being thrown up will have an equal distribution of throws away in both orientations towards and away from the sun within one full year  less are detected when the pole is out of view. With CP violation it is similar, the timing of the twists (spin) alternating between matter and antimatter  causes the overlap and while most photons emitted are from the matter state a small number are emitted from the antimatter state of twist  (or vice versa) leading to the perception that CP symmetry is violated. Like the stone being thrown at the North pole the distribution of the orientation of all outward throws is equal but only most are detectable and a minority seem to move away from the sun counter to the direction of the majority. While testing for  symmetry would dictate that we do the same and throw a similar stone upwards simultaneously at the south pole the measurement of the dimensions of time prohibit multiple viewpoints simultaneously, As measurement in space and time are always restricted to one dimension of each at a time the opposite throw of the stone at the South Pole is NEVER detected within a one dimensional time paradigm just like we usually can't photograph a persons front and back at the same time it is only one at a time leading to the apparent violation of symmetry. If we put a mirror behind the person being photographed we can see both front and back, so can we find a way to reflect time like the mirror reflects light? Let's wait until everyone around the world gets familiar with the basic theory first then we will go deeper into the exciting stuff.


There was a section here about CPT symmetry explaining why it is not violated but I have since learned that physicists currently find no CPT violation which is what I also get using STT so being essentially irrelevant I have removed it. 



FIXING THE VACUUM CATASTROPHE: HUBBLES LAW IS REPRESENTATIVE OF GRAVITY NOT DISTANCES
AND THE REVISED INVERSE SQUARE LAW ADDING ENERGY LOST TO GRAVITY EN ROUTE

  Hubble's constant is representative of the pull of gravity which affects the energy of light en route not distance. The more gravity grows the more power it has to pull in energy from passing light and massive objects, so it pulls in more and grows and pulls in more and grows and pulls in more and grows. Meaning there is more redshift occurring every next time we measure it. This is what is constantly growing not distances. 
In  spectroscopy the energy of the light is reduced as it passes through gravitational zones so the detection lines mark the pull of gravity which causes objects to lose energy. So the inverse square law and spectroscopy are being misinterpreted. The redshift is not due to objects moving away it is due to increased pull in gravitational zones passed en route which reduces the energy. To illustrate it I will show the example of the inverse square law.

The expansion of the Universe [49] according to STT is a misinterpretation or misunderstanding of the data hence why the numbers don't match when calculated. The Universe itself is not expanding rather the fabric of spacetime is expanding AROUND LARGE CELESTIAL OBJECTS: planets, stars, black holes as large mass gathers in clumps. To understand this consider a two dimensional analogy. We can compare our classical spatially 3 dimensional universe with a 2 dimensional plane to illustrate the theory. I will use a trampoline which has a very stretchy fabric. If we insert a fork at any point in the fabric and begin twisting we will gather material in clumps around the fork. All connecting strands in the fabric within the trampoline frame will become stretched/expanded but the trampoline itself doesn't necessarily expand in fact if it´s frame is itself fabric it will contract also due to the pull inwards. With the universe the areas I am comparing with forks twisting the fabric are large celestial objects: planets, suns, black holes. The acceleration is due to gravity growing over time accelerating the compaction of material and with that the stretch of the fabric in every direction. The larger suns and black holes grow the more matter they can pull in so they grow exponentially over time. So it is not the universe that is expanding it is individual areas within the space time fabric which are pulling inwards expanding/stretching the surrounding TREDDs in the fabric. the Universe is in fact contracting overall. As objects grow bigger they are able to pull in more matter leading to the acceleration.

The revised equation for distance: 
Newton's inverse square law is incorrect as it does not factor in the energy lost to the pull of gravity.The inverse square law itself is not related to gravity, it simply reflects the fact that the further away from the light source we go the light is distributed between more space so the intensity decreases in the ratio of the inverse law. So gravity must be factored in separately in the calculations for cosmic distances because we have to add in the extra energy lost to the increased pull of the gravitational zones which have grown in mass in between the times of a and b. This will almost certainly (with odds surely beyond 99%) give us an overall contraction of the fabric and decreased distances and a simultaneous increased curvature in the panoramic gravitational lens effect. It should be more like this, The extra energy lost in b through the extra expansion of the fabric in gravitational zones will surely give us a greater overall number for i(b)+e/g(b) than i(a)+e/g giving us a reduced number for d²(b) and therefore a shorter distance.  Giving us a contracting universe overall.  Or if we assume a steady state universe as Albert Einstein and the great Fred Hoyle (who coined the term "big bang" ironically to emphasise how absurd it was) did, we can use Einstein's cosmological constant as a description of the stretch in the fabric. I would still argue that while we get a stead state universe this is still relatively steady state over a  given time. Beyond that there is a miniscule but incremental contraction over  a longer period. So effectively for our measurements most stars outside our compacted locality of the universe remain practically the same distance from us, it is the fabric that stretches inwards into these compacted areas. Where the two identifiers are described as a and b, a being the first measurement of any specific star b is the measurement of the same star at a later time, and e/g represents the increased energy lost to the increased pull of gravitational zones passed en route to the observer, which have logically grown in mass and pull in between the times of a and b, 

(i(a)+(i(a)-i/g(a)) x d²(a) =(i(b)+(i(b)-i/g(b)) x d²(b)
Next we abbreviate the energy loss to gravity en route from  (i(x)-i/g(x)) to e/g(a , b, ....x, y or z etc)
e/g(x) = (i(x)-i/g(x))
we get the abbreviated equation

(i(a)+e/g(a)) x d²(a)=(i(b)+e/g(b)) x d²(b)
(© 13:50 central European time 12 June revised 14:14 CET 22/June/2020.. Any different expression or reordering of the sequence containing the same essence of the equation or the use of any other identifiers different from "a" and "b" still come under the copyright.). How we calculate the total gravitational pull between the two locations is much more complicated as we need to know the total mass of all the stars, black holes and planets passed en route and the distance of the path of the light from those passed objects. Isaac Newton's work with light through prisms [13] showed us that wavelength can be changed by path change not necessarily only by linear outward/inward expansion of the Doppler effect [14] and Einstein showed that the path of light is changed by gravity  [29] so it's colour/energy would also be changed. Thanks to Andrea Ghez and team[51] we already know energy is lost but to double check it also affects the energy of light in case any sceptic might think that light would be affected any differently than a massive object, we can use Einstein's method of using an eclipse to measure the redshift of a star as it passes close to the sun and compare it to the redshift of the same star when it is far from the sun relative to us. If there were no affect of gravity on redshift the two would be the same but we expect they will show a difference. Fortunately we don't need to wait for an eclipse, we can use the data collected from work on redshift and measure again from a satellite telescope like the Hubble telescope by blocking out the sun from a few metres away from the satellite's lens and comparing the two. Best of course to use the nearest stars, perhaps even planets so the brightness allows for greater measurement of the redshift. Then again we are due a solar eclipse passing over Argentina and Chile on 14th December this year. Which hopefully passes some observatories capable of running and broadcasting the experiment live around the world. What we will surely find is that when gravity is taken into account these stars will be found to be getting pulled closer to the observers (us) rather than accelerating further away. The acceleration is due to the accumulation of gravity in gravitational zones over time.

Hubble's constant is measuring the pull of gravity which affects the energy of light en route. The more gravity grows the more power it has to pull in energy from passing light and massive objects, so it pulls in more and grows and pulls in more and grows and pulls in more and grows. Meaning there is more redshift occurring every next time we measure it. This is what is constantly growing not distances. 
  imagine we are in a submarine  say a big yellow one  https://youtu.be/m2uTFF_3MaA  and we use radars to locate where an object say another submarine carrying lots of blue meanies  https://youtu.be/G2uCNd1AVJo  is we use sound waves. These however are only accurate where there is relatively still water. If there is a vortex or an undercurrent coming from an oceanic drift between us and the other sub that sound will become distorted and we won't get an accurate measure of distance or location, it may be a rough estimation but it is not accurate. It is similar with redshift. Gravity passed through en route distorts the path and the signal arriving is reduced in energy. Albert Einstein showed us that the path of light is changed by gravity and Andrea Ghez's team confirmed what we already were certain was true, that objects lose energy passing through gravitational zones, the stronger the gravitational pull the more energy is lost as it is passed.  

DARK ENERGY
Early in the 20th Century astrophysicists studying stars noticed that distant stars appear to be moving away from us so concluded the universe must be expanding. [68] But this seemed a bit odd because the universe is full of gravity which pulls things closer. So to try to explain it they imagined a mysterious force must be at work and they called this force dark energy.
Dark energy is a theoretical energy used to provide an answer to the seemingly paradoxical phenomena of the expanding universe I.e. if gravity is pulling everything in why is the universe expanding? Physicists have proposed dark energy as this elusive force but it is in fact panoramic gravitational lensing. The reality is that as gravity pulls in, the fabric of space expands, not the universe, for example if we put a finger in a spiders web at the middle and twist then it acts like gravity it pulls in the web, the web strands expand as it gets stretched. Why objects  may APPEAR to be moving apart is an optical illusion called gravitational lensing but unlike the well known localised gravitational lensing around black holes this gravitational lensing is affected by huge different expanses of space and time which affects the magnification of our view. 

Einstein's biggest mistake is often referred to as "Einsteins biggest blunder" [80] known as the cosmological constant. In truth his biggest mistake was thinking it was a mistake. Einstein believing in a steady state universe formulated the equation for the cosmological constant to describe the logic that stops the overall universe from expanding or contracting with varying amounts of gravity. In a sense it describes the tension in the space time fabric which counteracts with a pull against any effects of the pull by gravity. The evidence that was concluded to show  stars  are moving away from each other was discovered in the 1920's by Edwin Hubble [83] which led physicists to conclude the universe was expanding outwards. Given the evidence it was concluded that Einstein's cosmological constant was wrong, his cosmological constant should restrain it. So Einstein retracted his cosmological constant and accounts tell us he termed it the biggest blunder of his life. However with recent improvements in technology and available data in order to redress the mathematics of an expanding universe which are so incorrect/at variance with the predictions, called the vacuum catastrophe, Einstein's cosmological constant is repeatedly brought back and used to make sense of the numbers [82] and as a result repeatedly gives numbers that are consistent with the observations. Now with Spring Time Theory the logic shows that this restraining tension is intrinsic to the universe and consistent with a universe that expands or to use another term gets stretched inwards towards gravitational zones. As it does the observations over space and time become subject to magnification by the lens effect.A similar lack of understanding relating to distance is demonstrated by the dramatisation of the fictional catholic priest Father Ted Crilly in this youtube clip [81] https://youtu.be/MMiKyfd6hA0


The universe visible event horizon is not that we are losing stars etc as they travel away from us, it is increased curvature bending/redshifting the light´s path so eventually its path is curved so much it bends, loses so much energy it dims and goes out of view from the Earth completely.
No other model I have come across can explain how the supposed initial expansion slowed down then began to accelerate. STT theoretically could but I don´t encourage it. So it is not that stars are moving away from us causing redshift. It is because of the redshift as light shifts direction and loses energy as it passes through the increasingly expanding gravitational zones, expanding fabric strands stretch more as objects gain more and more mass and are compacted tighter together. The previously mentioned inverse square law [50] was used to calculate the speed stars are moving away from us due to the energy loss but this is no longer valid. The international team of astrophysicists studying the activity of stars around the milky way´s central black hole Sag-A [51] over the last few decades found last year (2019) that the star S0-2 lost 0.03% of its energy as it passed close to Sag-A´s gravitational well. So it is the overall energy lost by light as it travels through the space time fabric that is being calculated not distance. It is conceivable that distant stars are still moving away and we have to factor in the loss of energy due to gravity but the logic does not support it. The logic supports that these stars are actually being pulled closer towards us. Just like any 2 points in the trampoline analogy would be brought closer with any fork twists so it is with the stars we observe. This is not only a logical explanation it seems to be the only explanation that even attempts to address why a theoretical initial expansion called inflation slowed down then accelerated again. This initial expansion of inflation is not logical, a certain expansion is possible at an early time but not on the scale proposed by big bang proponents. The fact that the logic of STT shows that there is an ether in the fabric means a big bang from a single point is more or less impossible. It is time to go back and look at everything again.
Inflation itself has no basis in reality it is a "fudge" to sugar coat the many flaws in the big bang model which show it to be incorrect in the hope that a missing link can be found. There isn't one, it is simply incorrect. 

The earlier universe has multiple possible states, it could contract and expand in cycles in areas the size of the average galaxy, or it possibly reached a state of equilibrium where the tension holding the fabric together and the inherent push of the coiled springs reached a state of balance. This was after a period where the fabric had been wound tightly into gravitational clumps so huge that the overall universe had contracted with the pull. Then some event happened to cause perhaps a number of super massive objects, together containg all the mass of the Universe, in unbelievably large black holes, to perhaps collide and disperse. One off the cuff postulation, there may be multiple credible hypotheses, time will tell. This cycle of expansion and contraction happening many times over the life of the universe in what is called the Big Bounce [52] (what I called the big pulse before I came across the term the big bounce). Or perhaps there are many such cycles of compaction and release in different locations. Now we in the Milky Way and surrounding areas are in the phase where gravity is accelerating and causing the stretch in the fabric by large and growing stars and black holes which will perhaps eventually lead to another very compacted area in the Universe which at some point will reach a tipping point in some way and disperse again.

COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND
I predict that the cosmic microwave background [53] CMB is not redshifted light left over from an early epoch after a theoretical big bang. It is simply resonance. As each wave of light passes every RIK in space it forces the RIK to oscillate. After it passes these RIKs continue to resonate just as a piano or guitar string will continue to resonate or wobble after a note has been struck. One way to check for this is to overlay a map of the CMB in all the universe with a map showing all the other detectable light waves in the universe in the electromagnetic spectrum from gamma waves through to visible light and we should see a relationship between both.
The anisotropic property of the CMB is logically due to the position of our visible universe within the universe itself. STT predicts that most matter exists at the "edge" of the universe where light rebounds and interacts with a predicted big pulse/bounce. So when we look towards the outer edge of the universe the connections between the quantum field particles "RIKs" are closer to flat right angled intersections and we expect to get less redshift due to less curvature/gravity. The further we go in the other direction the more redshift we are likely to detect as the angles between connections is more acutely angular. The large dark spots found in the CMB are likely due to two reasons, firstly light emitted passes through zones with more curvature so less light reaches us, secondly the fact that because of more curvature black holes can grow much larger than they can nearer the edge. Near the edge when quasars grow to a certain size in a fairly flat area of spacetime I expect they have two poles whose relative stability in orientation allows them reach that point of resistance in the fabric which halts and moves to reverse their rotation, once rotating below the speed of light they fling galaxies worth of light back into space. For black holes in zones with more curvature and less symmetrically opposed poles they are likely to have shifting poles which means with less stability and more movement in orientation they can grow significantly perhaps phenomenally larger in mass before they cause that resistance in the fabric and get slowed below the speed of light. They would likely not have the distinct accretion discs due to their ever shifting polar orientations. So the hemisphere of our visible universe where we see the greatest concentration of these large dark areas is likely to be in the inner area and somewhere beyond them is the centre of the universe itself. 

OCCAMS RAZOR
According to the law of physics known as Occam´s Razor [54] when two or more conflicting theories try to explain the same thing we must accept the one which uses less assumptions and exhibits superior logic. SST and the big pulse is vastly superior to the big bang from a singularity, the other advantage I have is that it is verifiable by measurements of the structure and dynamics of the model not merely extrapolation of mathematical trends alone and it needs no tweaks, fictional events, unfounded theories or assumptions with no basis in logic to make it work, it is sound, robust logic with no loose ends. The understanding of the field, the existence of an ether and the fact quantum mechanics rules out a singularity effectively rules out the big bang completely. "quantum mechanics does not permit particles to inhabit a space smaller than their wavelengths" [58]
STT does not try to answer the origins of the Universe while the big bang does but frankly using unsubstantiated claims, mathematics which don´t add up and without any strong/convincing logic [55], the fact that the field has an internal medium and the connecting strands can in theory be twisted similar to DNA suggests that the universe itself is alive and growing.


Some physicists I have heard try to explain the Universe coming into existence from nothing as comparable to events happening inside a vacuum where random activity happens all the time. This is actually very misleading[68] Any physicists knows that a vacuum created by humans is a relative or partial vacuum [57] and the best vacuum created on Earth still has millions of atoms per metre cubed so collisions will still occur. Not comparable to a void. If physicists argue this is as a result of a collision with another monople or something like that frankly it would seem like a carrot on a string exercise, to keep the reality just out of reach to keep the donkey (false dogma) going. The reality is that human intelligence CANNOT explain the start of something from nothing, we only understand beginnings relative to other existing moments in time, we cannot explain or even seem to comprehend how something ever started from nothing. It is simply beyond us, certainly beyond anyone I have ever known. Given the new understanding of the field revealed in spring time theory we need to reassess everything again and a monopole where all the matter in the universe was contained in a space similar or smaller than one "particle" just doesn´t hold to logic. It seems the universee  grew from one particle/seed like every living thing in it.
So if the big bang is incorrect which it is, what is the alternative?
Here is a fun but plausible theory but which is only and can only ever be an answer with existing time and matter already in existence, hence only a step towards a full answer which we will never have unless someone can explain how something came from nothing, no matter, no time. I expect no one but GOD, if there is one separate from us all, ever will. Many more may follow.
A logical beginning perhaps when energy is created (by "I" consciousness which the double slit experiment shows does interact with matter) at a central point, it travels out in 3 dimensions of space and 3 of time. The initial creation at the single RIK created by "I" or consciousness (explained in the double slit experiment.) simply by the will of consciousness to experience others. Without others there is no life per se, existence perhaps but isolation most people would probably agree isn't truly living it is just existing. Useful at times but the overriding instinct in humans is to interact to experience others. So using the power of the magic of the number 3 (as stated by arguably the best hip hop artists ever [71]) in 2 states, one of space and one of time, consciousness simply willed and pushed for more, with male and female energy bouncing off each other but confined until eventually with sheer will the space could no longer contain the wish to experience company/love and perhaps in between the mix of male energy creatively trying to make a point and feminine energy symbolised by curvature predominantly being beautiful and fun. The energy perhaps reached the power of 3 between two points and in an instant time also was stretched between two moments and by the power of 3 by 3 morphed in 3 dimensions of time managed to make 27 points and moved forward, breaking the mold and "breaking new ground". Once done female energy followed almost instantly having new space to have fun in. Gaining momentum with the fun she soon overtook the male energy which having made the point began to lose momentum wondering what had been created. As curvature passed him she no linger saw the point in continuing without him and stopped. The male energy arrived at the outer curvature time was stretched further with the momentum but curvature led that energy back towards the centre. ie. the creative energy was turned back by the pull/attraction of curvature/gravity, the momentum collided and multiplied and so it continues exponentially. Energy travels in and out from the centre to the surface exponentially with every pulse. While the Universe appears to be flat it is because we are at the surface where all the "action" happens. Perhaps our visible universe corresponding to the full universe in the ratio of an area on a still water say in the ocean in a perfectly calm day the size of a coin or plate. The world is round but is huge in comparison and that surface area of the water appears almost flat. So with every pulse more energy is created and passes through the field, it gets caught in vortices, first as electrons, then kissing balls then as neutrons and protons, atoms, molecules, clusters, planets, suns, black holes, quasars. At quasars these vortexes seem to reach maximum momentum, are probably slowed by the fabric they begin to de-acellerate and once spinning below the speed of light turn super mega nova releasing a Galaxy's worth of energy out again in an instant. The light lost to redshift either ending up in black holes or back to the centre of the Universe where it may gather and send another massive pulse of energy out which will travel with enough force to expand the surface again. That wave could be coming any day and our way of life disappears in an instant, who knows? There's nothing we could do about it anyway and we couldn't see it coming so probably best we all just have as much fun as we can while we are here.   While light, heat, sound, taste etc are vibrations detected by our biological machines, our bodies we can use physical machines to detect further. Then we can detect electromagnetic radiation outside the visible spectrum, sounds outside our audio spectrum, solid objects outside our locality. With consciousness it is the opposite, we need to use our biological machines, our bodies, with energy focused within to sense vibrations and truths which cannot be quantified using numbers or detectable by machines. Then we begin to understand and experience events happening outside our normal reality, usually restricted to events happening within our time spectrum. In time no doubt our understanding of the spirit and the force, love, will improve beyond what we can imagine now. Just like the patience of Aristarchus observing the night sky alone 2,500 years ago led eventually to gazing  and finding stars perhaps 92 billion light years away and technological advances like Galileo's telescopes bit by bit led to machines able to study atomic nuclei, electrons etc. With patience and focused will we will come to ever greater understanding of all beings existing within nature, the Universe, whether within the realm of biological life or outside of it in the realm of death/darkness. Individually and collecively pushing the boundaries of our detectable realities as we progress. 

END NOTE
In a world where people put a price on everything physical that nature gives freely in order to control or exert advantage over others, from water to fruit, fire to information it seems to me essential that this theory must be distributed freely and as peer reviewers have refused to review it without profit it must be without official peer review.
To any physicist or mathematician who knows now that this is the framework that physicists have been searching for but for whatever reason is hesitating to help send it viral, please don't hesitate.   Do it not for my sake but for the sake of what this understanding of physics means for the world. Please do not take any of this personally, I may hit on some harsh truths which may hurt but my aim is to help people "get real" and face reality, which perhaps necessitates facing some painful, humbling truths. While some academics may like to insist on slow, beaurocratic, institutional peer review which has some merits (but is unlawfully and immorally more accessible to the wealthy) there are exceptions to many rules and I would urge people to be cognizant of the fact we are losing thousands of SPECIES a MONTH globally with habitat destruction, if one stops, sits still and meditates on this fact it is genuinely shocking.  While we collectively are dumbed down/numbed by focus on negative news, sexualised manipulative marketing, bad science, cheap over dramatised trivial entertainment, constant overt promotion of material possessions with subliminal threats that the pursuit of physical wealth must be upheld to safeguard our safety and existence opposite to the reality, this lowering of consciousness drives consumerism and the accelerating destruction of this paradise planet.  We really ought to be humbling ourselves, snapping out of our complacency and facing our responsibilities as the alpha species. We should demonstrate genuine thanks and appreciation for our privileged and luxurious lives as the alpha species by shouldering the responsibility that comes with it.  If one stops to think about it, the rate of species loss is a truly frightening, horrific number and remember this is FOREVER, while we may, perhaps have a slight chance of regenerating species from preserved DNA in the future if we survive, this will likely only be a slight number of the lost magnificence and beauty of nature. While overfed, over arrogant, self assured, complacent cynics indulge in egotistical waffle arguing for or against global warming and petty vain issues about adult lifestyles and sexual choices we ARE in the middle of a global holocaust which is increasing in destructive violence every day and in my opinion we are irresponsible for every wasted second of lost opportunity.  The potential benefits that the understanding of  STT can lead to should not be ignored or suppressed for a second. The harsh reality is that it has been deliberately held back by elitists stuck in the big bang/outwards expanding model. In physics forums it was deliberately nit picked because it does not follow the traditional "travelling" particle paradigm but this is impossible because that paradigm is completely incorrect so my discussions were repeatedly closed and put into obscure "pseudoscience" "personal theory" or other similar domains. No matter how much I tried to explain in English it was clear if I did not follow their line of thinking (which can't be done, reality follows a completely different paradigm) I was going to be mocked, have points put against me and have discussions put out of view. 
In the case of social media it has been the same, I have had complaints put against me almost as soon as I try to engage with anyone and I am  fairly sure there  is at least one  Nobel prize winner among those who complained, I get the feeling that there is an air of infallibility that comes with a Nobel prize. That if one wins a Nobel prize he must know everything and could miss nothing. In the case of youtube I put the comment on a video of a lecture by a Nobel prize winner talking about his Prize win explaining the data and theory, I commented explaining that the interpretation of the redshift was incorrect. I explained very clearly why, referring to Newtons work with prisms showing path change and Einstein's work showing light's path is changed by gravity . I don't know who complained to youtube but when I contacted youtube to contest my account being suspended they said the complainant said I was giving false information and it seems the "whoever" must have put pressure on youtube staff perhaps threatening legal action and my account and my months of work was then deleted permanently. Given that I gave the logic and I pointed out the contradiction in the lecture that made it clear it backed up my theory one would expect a scientist with integrity would look at the information but for whatever reason instead they attacked my work. The contradiction which was mentioned was that a few stars in our part of the Universe were being pulled closer together but all the stars outside our locality were expanding away from each other. It was presented as a matter of fact oddity with no real significance, the reality is that it is an extremely important clue. If anyone holds back this they too are not welcome at my breakthrough party either! . So we don't want anybody left out unnecessarily. Come on!! https://youtu.be/IKqV7DB8Iwg

My point is I have been trying to open minds for over a year to the fact that time is 3 dimensional and science has been held back by closed minds, whether by simple folly who consider it absurd (like a Nobel prize winner who replied to an email of mine in which I gave the mathematics and logic saying "when I look at my watch it shows time is one dimensional" I replied saying "when I listen to the radio on my smart watch it only plays one radio station at a time but I know there are many radio stations which could be tuned into" but I got no further reply and it seems to me he never read beyond '3 dimensional time') whether by "clever" scientists who consider it an insult that they could be wrong considering the qualifications they have, whether by a system which will only peer review articles which have a monetary gain for them or whether an elitist obsession with everything being backed up by mathematics (there existed a similar elite in music by classical/traditional musicians who opposed blues/jazz/rock and roll as base and vulgar often played by people who couldn't even read or write music but the spirit of joy, truth and love endured and rock and roll became the dominant force in music). Now that my website is getting thousands of views a week as the analytics show but no-one seems to be taking the step to stand up and say "yes I am on board" one of my fears is that it will be read by subversive anti progress agents completely mentally stuck in the big bang model before it goes viral ,who perhaps have built a career, fortune and reputation around the BB/outwards expanding universe model who will try to have it removed from weebly using perhaps both legal pressure and bribes perhaps even to attack their servers. It is not just a personal concern it is a concern for the advancement of humanity. Please I implore anyone and everyone who understands the theory to be brave, have faith in science and the truth and send it to everyone you know. I cannot use twitter or facebook, like Galileo I have been locked out of social interaction. I am begging everyone to do it on my behalf and on behalf of humanity especially the generations to come. We all know this planet is at a crisis point in time and there is a lot of uncertainty about it's future, the certainty that this scientific breakthrough provides should not be underestimated. It possibly contains insights to provide instant phenomenal advancements in the advancement of healthcare, renewable energy communications and more, much more than I can anticipate. Every day, every hour is a wasted opportunity. When I realised that time was 3 dimensional and that we could prove it by analysing the activity on the front screen in conjunction with the activity on the back screen in my naivety I thought it would be grasped in an instant by phsyicists and be headline news within a day or two and they would be excited to have the framework which should unlock the Theory of Everything, I thought they would be ecstatic and get to work immediately. Wow! how wrong I was! Physicists did have access to the information but decided to ignore it, I was told outright by many that the activity on the front screen was irrelevant, so the theory got into the minds but for whatever reason what they already "knew" could not be questioned in their minds so they didn't even check. Little did I know I had to learn quantum physics terminology and etiquette, read countless (many irrelevant) papers and come up with new mathematical formula in order to get someone, anyone to think outside the BB box. When I do and use simple clear logic which I naively thought physicists would be delighted to have at last, I and my work are attacked. d. If anyone understands the truth please stand up for it and share it. Time will vindicate us and I am sure our great great.....grandchildren if we have any will thank us. Conversely if anyone can see that this provides the framework for the loose ends and explains the mysteries, that it is the truth and is afraid or unwilling for whatever reason to stand up for it and stays silent you hold back science.
The dynamics of time that I describe in the experiments and the workings of the field is surely just the beginning. We are likely to find out much more about time dimensions and perhaps other dimensions of consciousness in the years ahead. 
. I am aware this writing does not explain fully or mathematically all the concepts involved, that could take a long time and a lot of resources which with essentially no formal academic training in mathematics and having no money is not realistic. The reality mathematics like any language articulates the logic and the logic is expressed equally well in English, the exact ratios, lengths, speeds are something for mathematicians to work on, first though one must understand the logic and let go of the one dimensional time paradigm that has kept this simple reality locked for 100 years. The subject of the article is to give an explanation for the quantum field which makes common sense of gravity, objects and time in a visual way and is consistent with:
1. Newtown’s and Einstein’s laws of relativity AND quantum mechanics 
2. Other known laws of physics and
3. What the double slit experiment solution revealed.
4. Providing a logical framework to explain how many unknowns work on the quantum level (

It brings our focus back from a physically focused scientific model to include our spirit or consciousness into the scientific model which this field shows is necessary.
While our traditional understanding is that we are bodies made up of particles moving through empty space we are not. We can't be, this field theory proves it. We are consciousness entangled with collections of waves of energy moving through the particles in the field, passing through trillions of these field particles every second. The field is the material which we move through, we are not material moving through space. This seems illogical on first reflection because it shows we are inside and outside the lattice at the same time...one might ask the question but how can we be outside and inside at the same time? The logical answer is our physical sensations are waves of energy generated inside the field and we experience them via our consciousness. It indicates we must be souls. There is no other logical explanation, we know we are conscious beings usually viewed as bodies containing what is traditionally termed souls, without consciousness we couldn't lift a finger or make a smile. While traditionally we think we are bodies containing souls in fact we are conscious souls containing bodies. The waves of energy are orchestrated collectively by consciousness into waves of energy speeding through the lattice held together as biological bodies using our consciousness. It is difficult perhaps impossible to explain experience or thought in any other way. 
The burning question for many is how or what is the mechanism that allows or facilitates that bridge between spirit/consciousness and the material universe? It is the understanding of that bridge that led me to solve the double slit experiment when I came across it and thereby unlock the unified field theory. That bridge is one of the fundamental laws of nature among others that I will reveal to a worldwide audience where everyone or as many people as possible have a chance to participate regardless of wealth, tribe, religion or nation. First there must be a basic understanding of the science of the field, then we can go to the next step. 

I fell into an exhausted sleep this morning after I added the last addition about working on the properties of the skin of the spacetime fabric. I woke up a few hours later and realised that after coming to the number 1905 in the equation for e that I have been lumbered with responsibility and an expectation far beyond what is needed for this to be accepted by law as the true Theory of Everything. Trying to work out the exact structure of the skin of the spacetime fabric to get people to convince them I am correct is far beyond what is essential. It is like officials demand that I jump through an endless loop of hoops after completing a marathon miles ahead of everyone else before they will acknowledge my achievement, pushing the finish line to waste time while figuring out what to do because I have upset the status quo, perhaps because I am not part of the favourite team, the TV cameras ignoring me and still focusing on the next runners still miles behind who expected to win, perhaps because I have shown many people who are highly intelligent and well educated to be woefully incorrect and perhaps they feel unable to share in that joy of scientific discovery. We lost time and opportunities to advance when my channel was deleted, I tried to convince myself for a long time that this was blind folly but I gave the logic and pointed out the facts which every physicist knows. That Newton showed redshift is also due to pathchange not just the doppler effect, that Einstein showed light's path is changed by gravity and Andrea Ghez's team showed energy is lost passing through gravitational zones. Armchair theorists online are usually ignored or their comments ripped to shreds by armchair physicists but neither happened. Someone clearly sensed a threat to their comfort zone and acted rashly (saying I was giving false information)  to have my work destroyed, perhaps using their credentials and threat of legal action to twist the arm of youtube staff.  It left me demoralised, exhausted and in tears but thanks to positive loving people like Lizzo who sang me a song and cheered me up  https://youtu.be/vuq-VAiW9kw  I was given fresh energy and able to smile and laugh again and ease the burden. It was very visual which would have helped many grasp the logic in a few seconds better than 1,000 words perhaps.

I ask please don't do this any more, please be part of it and do share in that joy, lighten up at least and have a laugh at yourselves at best, everyone makes mistakes (even Einstein:see the section on dark energy)and collectively these can be huge, it is much much easier to turn a small one man boat than an ocean cruiser. To anyone who read this previously while there were still many errors and lack of clear terminology I say I gave the experiments to cross check and explained I don't have math training. Perhaps many people who were simply too busy or pre occupied with their own worries/responsibilities to give the small time needed to setup the experiment I can understand partly. Please be part of it now. Many physicists who have read this far already know this is the Theory of Everything so to those who do but are not spreading it I say this. To anyone who has read this far and who understands physics and knows that this is The Theory of Everything I ask you now please send it to everyone you know via emails/twitter/facebook/instagram/whatsapp/tumblr etc, text or call all your friends on the phone and tell them the news. For anyone waiting for an assumed authority like a corporate profit driven peer review journal (even those who claim to be non profit but have refused to peer review this because they want a price paid or control of the copyright) to peer review it the reality is they have had the opportunity and refused it, they have held back science by insisting on gaining monetarily from it. They have engaged in the most prevalent discrimination on the planet, while there is woeful discrimination against women, people with "disabilities", people with dark skin, there is one discrimination that oppresses even more than these and encompasses all genders, ethnicities, religions and nationalities, which is epitomised by the discrimination of women of dark skin with "disabilities"  https://youtu.be/PLzB0xmph64  that is economic discrimination. While I don't expect that anyone not familiar and educated in physics send it to everyone simply because it makes sense, I do say to any physicist especially those with influence in education or any media who knows the laws of physics you know by now that it is clear that this is THE theory. If you do not send it to everyone explaining this is the theory of everything for whatever personal reason then you too are part of that discrimination, you are not acting with scientific integrity, quite the opposite, your silence holds back scientific advances and therefore holds back humanity. You don't have to do that, the truth will surface sooner or later, better to be a part of it and share in the joy than watch it unleashed to the world with shame. Please share it with passion because it is the truth and everyone deserves access to the truth and because the truth empowers everyone. Note added 07:16 14th May 2020 central European time from "I fell into...".

If I get time and money/resources I’ll try to add some more detail, pictures and references, I am having a lot of technical problems when trying to get references up. Some of the gifs I had aren't showing up unfortunately. Below are some links to a few. 
[1] https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Richard_Feynman (the character of physical law)
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativity
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_(classical_element)
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model
[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity
[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_orbital
[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon
[10] https://plus.maths.org/content/newton-and-kissing-problem
[11] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion
[12] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covalent_bond
[13] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prism
[14] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppler_effect
[15] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_current
[16] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation
[17] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave
[18] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase_(waves)#Phase_shift
[19] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_chromodynamics
[20] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter
[21] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle
[22] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star
[23] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole
[24] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittarius_A
[25] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Way
[26] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blueshift
[27] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex
[28] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_thermodynamics
[29] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light
[30] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_metric
[31] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova
[32] https://futurism.com/photons-million-year-journey-center-sun
[33] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar
[34] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton
[35] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetism
[35A] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoelectric_effect
[36] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnet
[36a] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_charge
[37] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light
[38] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_teleportation
[39] https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.00934
[40] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_recording_and_reproduction
[41] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement
[42] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_oscillation
[43] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_pulsar
[44]

[45] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chirality
[46] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA
[47] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parity_(physics)#Parity_violation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wu_experiment
[48] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_oscillator
[49] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_the_universe
[50] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law
[51] The study by the intercontinental team published in 16 August 2019 in "Science" Vol 365 issue 6454 pp. 664-668
DOI: 10.1126/science.aav8137
 
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/365/6454/664ttps://arxiv.org/abs/1707.00934
[52] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bounce
[53] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background
[54] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
[55] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_(cosmology)#Magnetic-monopole_problem
[56] https://thetechreader.com/top-ten/top-ten-scientific-flaws-in-the-big-bang-theory/
[57] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum
[58]  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
[59] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonoluminescence
 Note: the idea of using water for atomic or nuclear energy should never be considered as a fuel source. It should be obvious but to anyone who cannot instantly see the madness and subsequent series of events  it would lead to the elimination of all life on the planet very rapidly. Water is a great source of kinetic energy NOT subatomic energy.
 (what I find with many "scientists" like in science forums is that when I try to explain something simply they would not engage unless I used their terminology and complex mathematical equations like "Hubbles Law!!!"which it turns out is incorrect, a waste of time and a display of  condescension/intellectual discrimination, made worse by the fact with the sheer amount of new information I have had to learn myself and the stresses of homelessness: thieves stealing my phone and more, police assaulting me, moving me on and imprisoning me for no crime, people shouting at me for sleeping in a corner they don't want to walk to but past and they prefer it empty as they pass, sometimes beaten by someone with pent up anger, often cold, tired and hungry, having to walk miles in the middle of the night to find a free wifi hotspot or toilet etc etc I ended up tired, stressed, misunderstanding what some of the symbols meant and using them incorrectly, more time wasted, all I wanted a year ago was someone to analyse the double slit experiment with the front screen also. One year and a month later no one has. Not just was it misunderstood, for example when I explained the logic, I was told outright that the front screen is irrelevant, I explain the logic about the ether and I get an essay full of symbols, equations, complex terms by someone explaining why "there is no ether and never will be an ether" none of which I understand nor do I see the point if it blinds a person completely to common sense to if it doesn't help someone understand common sense. Not to mention the insults and profanity forbidden by the rules but clearly OK for the regulars and some moderators until they get them thrown back. Another agreed I could post a link to my website when I said I had a new equation but the CC copyright terms state the link must go in so I wouldn't share the equation unless the link went in, once they saw the equation however the link was removed. I got none of my theory from any other unified field theories, I understood the basic idea behind Einstein's work and Newtons but that was about it, I simply understood what was happening in the double slit experiment when I came across it and everything else fitted into place one by one. I had to learn other theories to try and express it in relation to others making mistakes in terminology sometimes misunderstanding a certain aspect of the experiment and going astray at times. Almost everything I came up against I was able to solve within a few hours of thinking about it. If I had formal education I would have been blinded like everyone else perhaps. The fact is what I realised could have been realised by someone 100 years ago if they had the specific understanding I had. I had to learn the standard model and it fitted like a glove, I made a mistake with the dynamics of electromagnetism which I was able to correct once I realised there was an ether. The point is unlike whoever said "I got to where I am bu standing on the shoulders of giants" my giants were not.scientists they were good people, kind, patient, respectful, humble, sweet, funny, forgiving etc lest any living scientist thinks I owe them anything or was assisted by them apart from a few comments here and there that helped me spot my errors  with terminology. The opposite, scientists invariably made my job tougher, so if there's any anger or attitude in the papers, well give me a break, it's just words and not hurting anyone or holding back science. We have a lot to do so be thankful we got the Theory of Everything at last and take a joke where there is one please.)

 [61] https://pixabay.com/photos/marguerite-daisy-flower-white-729510/
[62] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiment
63] (I think Dave and co should have said indoctrination rather than education in the song, education is incredibly valuable, we all need it, Sid probably would have said indoctrination but he wasn't around, fork it, we all make mistakes and still Sid's influence is clearly felt within the song).
[62a] https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kissing-3d.png#mw-jump-to-license[63] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunokhod_1 
[64] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson
[65] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfluidity
[68] This reference is as much personal as it is scientific and quite morally heavy but there is a reason for it. Science has been and is used to oppress people so it warrants an example of the dangers this leads to. I had months of work destroyed on youtube by someone who used their scientific authority to silence me because they didn't like what I said that a Nobel prize was given incorrectly due to a misunderstanding of the data. This could have held back scientific advancement and ipso facto all of humanity from advancing because it was very visual and accessible. So it is no small deal how one persons pride or sense of authority can potentially affect humanity. As the field theory shows thought or consciousness as emotion is as important to physics now as the material, the angry big bang proponents who sometimes bully and intimidate to silence young questioning minds and whoever it was that had my work destroyed show this to be so. Judgement of the data is as much a part of science as the data itself. However  no need to quote it to young kids while any older kids with attention enough to read this far would be mature enough to understand it please no one quote this directly only allow readers who get this far read it for themselves. If it were quoted without all the mind blowing concepts and heavy thinking that come before it could be taken and used unintelligently to bash these people. That's not my aim my aim is to make them think and be silent because they are hurting many others. That's all, I don't want to see more hostility and resistance I want to see genuine understanding. So here's the point...  There are a small number of highly educated highly privileged people (in some countries access to primary education even language is a privilege for many) who misuse and misrepresent that education by taking good science and represent facts out of context making it into bad science. They travel around filling halls and perhaps stadiums giving lectures against the notion of God claiming they are scientists. To me they are the seedy snake oil salesmen of the scientific community. Adding to the deforestation of the planet killing innocent trees (who perhaps provided the fruit that nourished them as kids) to make books to sell and profit from their less than honest dealings. One of the things they go around making money as celebrities is that science indicates there is no superior intelligence or God or need for a God saying this is supported by science while presenting  scientific theory as facts often where the numbers don't add up (make sense). They use imaginary scientific ideas with no basis in logic or real world mathematics (to cover up where their ideas fall apart) as facts so less scientifically educated but religious people feel lost and the conmen appear correct.  This is both dishonest and very offensive, not just to any God if there is one but to me and many other humans regardless of whether we believe in God or not. Some people have no money, no home, no education, no fresh water, some who are perhaps much more intelligent than these highly privileged and educated people are locked up as labour slaves and toys for perverts for life from the time they can walk. Some people from older generations with greater wisdom and humanity burdened with more doubts and sadness as they grow weaker and more fearful of the uncertainty that comes with death and driven further in spirit from the younger generation (who incorrectly believe science is always based on facts so it must be true) when they should be enjoying the joy that young lives bring to old souls while passing on that wisdom to open innocent curious minds. Instead these confused and suffering young souls are so bombarded with lies and cheap physical temptations believing popularity and having more material possessions equates to credibility so they don't recognise who can be trusted and miss the true guidance that only love can give and these wise old loving souls end up being insulted, ignored and treated like old fools sometimes sent to residential homes which are sometimes in effect little or no different that prisons. When all these traumatised people have is a belief in God to give them strength, hope and relief from their suffering it is highly offensive and irresponsible that incredibly privileged people should use that privilege and education to attempt to disempower them further by lying saying science shows there is no God. If anyone doesn't believe in God that's understandable in many ways but to gain themselves more access to material rewards like tech, bling, cash, travel and sexual favours by disempowering those who already have nothing material by stealing their dreams using bad science effectively lies is extremely inhumane/immoral. They are in effect no different than the people they claim to be campaigning against, the scoundrels, thieves and sexual predators who call themselves priests and holy men and who misuse and misquote religious scriptures/philosophies to hide amongst unassuming religious good natured people in order to get access to sexual favours, peoples minds, money, children and homes. To manipulate them, steal their things by projecting false guilt and duty, who disrupt their families, who think they can make their own lives easier, themselves more powerful and their services (holy guidance) more sought after (by traumatised people who are seeking comfort) by creating more confusion as they assume the role of the unwavering, trustworthy, faithful, servants of God.  While this may seem to some unnecessary and unscientific to add to the paper my point is coming up. we have already seen that the big bang demonstrates how science can be misused and is in many ways interpretations based on what suits us ie. It is often subjective and it's abuse can give moral authority or credibility to people who do not deserve it. I decided to put it for a subjective personal reason, An old family friend, a kind, wise, intelligent mathematician, full of love and faith in a God, who is now very old, confused and scared by the world and what doesn't seem to make sense (some call it dementia. When he watches the news he becomes distressed, impatient, hostile, seems to lose his mind and acts irrationally, he seems to revert to being a child When he watches his favourite old comedies, listens to his favourite old music and when he feels safe he seems to remember everything, everybody and shows that relaxed, loving, tenderness and affection he showed to me when I was a kid.) his wife  is almost crippled physically and mentally with the physical stress of lifting him and the emotional of stress of the man she loves sometimes not recognising her and it hurts to see someone so strong in spirit who helped make me grow so strong in spirit so disempowered, exhausted and scared. Without such a wise old friend I may not have survived, the theory may have lay hidden for another 100 or thousand years that's IF humanity and the planet survived, it may not without it. So he is every bit as important to this theory being unlocked and those of his generation who kept that faith in God alive, to give strength to those of us who grew up to effectively have nothing else, deserve to be mentioned and respected. It was him who made me aware of how irresponsible and shallow thinking these people are. While watching the anti God squad on TV he casually said of the big bang "well they're not really saying anything at the end of the day, if that was the start, what started the start? Ah they're talking a load of bxxxxxxxx." Simple but genius clear logic that opened my mind and left it questioning rather than closed by a false conclusion presented as fact. 
[66] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AxionIll
[67] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Zeilinger  this information I came across in the video "Quantum Theory" on Advexon Science Network on youtube. https://youtu.be/CBrsWPCp_rs

[68] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_15
[69] the name RIK I used in honour of the comedy genius and irresistibly loveable man who made me and my childhood friends laugh until we cried and had many moments of entertainment through later years impersonating his characters. unfortunately he passed on from this life too soon and too young but he appears in my dreams as God and is in a sense what I imagine God would be like if it were a person. A sweet, kind, hilarious, brave soul who just wants to make everyone laugh. As the field particle is likely to be known as the God particle I decided to name it after Rik Mayall. Rik perhaps could have been one of the most famous and successful comedians on the planet but he had a hanger on throughout his career who is so unfunny Rik probably didn't have the heart to leave him behind or his career would have flopped known as Eddy to many. So Rik stayed humble and kept poor Eddy afloat. if Rik was here he would probably worry Eddy might feel left out perhaps even cry himself to sleep every night while sucking his thumb and hugging a teddy bear with Riks face painted on it so I thought it's probably best I include his name in the spring segment so I combined the thread image with Eddy and called it a TREDD, I'm sure it's what Rik would have wanted.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/across-the-universe/2012/oct/08/einstein-nobel-prize-relativity
[96] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronaldinho    
I mention Ronaldinho because of all the famous footballers I saw through the years, he seemed to me to instinctively understand more variables of physics and so have more tricks and magic than anyone else but more importantly he made everyone smile and so seemed to inspire love of the game more than any others. Probably because he himself never seemed to take things too seriously and always smiled... even when getting the red card. I say slightly easier because while he may kick a ball with less force he might do it with greater spin and curvature using almost impossible angles. This not just making it harder to anticipate where it will go but leaving opponents stunned and paralysed going what the =@&€ !!! as time seems to dilate and slow down as they watch helplessly in momentary slow motion as it sails gently into the net. So hopefully this will return the favour and make him smile. I make it reference number 96 totally out of sequence because just like 43 explained in the double silt experiment paper it seems such a lonely neglected number. So don't worry 96 I love you too. Mwah! 
[97] Of course it was really me who said "nice shot" I have a habit of doing it when I hit the screen at exactly the right spot but it might look a bit like I was cuckoo if I told everyone I was talking to myself in the middle of a serious scientific paper so I used Mick, he wasn't doing anything else anyway at the time.
[70] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_retroreflectors_on_the_Moon
[71] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Magic_Number  Arguably the best hip hop group because their music is not only intelligent and rhythmically infectious it is also great fun: funky............baby! Oh yeah! While on the subject! music made with a computerised drum beat is one dimensional time music and vastly inferior to music with a drummer or all human rhythm makers, only with a living beat does music move into 3 dimensional time and provide that unique magic of the experience of 3 dimensional time.
[72] 
[72] Patrick Speaks | Unreported World | https://youtu.be/AHfC6jqBhkk
[73] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_of_Katwe
[74] https://abcnews.go.com/Health/International/man-eat-drink/story?id=10787036
[75] Dynamo Jack https://youtu.be/wYVdhKVb9WE
[76] Gonzales Sensei https://youtu.be/GNuPJEiEo5o

Although evidence like we see with Prahlad and Dynamo Jack is robust and rigorous we still see scientific literature stating that a person can only live around 4-5 days with water without qualifying that as "usually". My belief is this is in a sense a patronising way of protecting people. Not wishing to encourage perhaps young innocent people into "extreme lifestyles" the truth is suppressed. I maintain that the only responsibility we have is to empower everyone with the truth and when we oppress the truth to the extent that we impart false information (lies) we are being irresponsible. People are generally not stupid, it is stated clearly that Prahlad practices very disciplined meditation and perhaps has unique mechanisms unlocked which allow him do what he does. Similarly with the other 2 mentioned men, disciplined meditation over a long period of time is essential for such conscious advancement.

[77] The Secret life of Plants by Peter Tompkins and Christopher Bird 1973. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Secret_Life_of_Plants worth noting that the wikipedia article focuses on it's criticism by many in corporate media with links to agro business they fail to show any pseudoscience that they alleged. It is a highly scientific collection of excellent science from many disciplines.This again illustrates the point Dr Michael Gregor makes that in order to hold back truth/science corporate profit driven industry does not need to counteract good science  with good research and evidence which shows the opposite, all these profit driven people need to do is introduce doubt to steer people from the truth. 
[78] https://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/03/prweb11623245.htm
[79] http://physicsbuzz.physicscentral.com/2010/09/hawking-mlodinow-no-theory-of_30.html?m=1
[80] http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Cosmological_constant
[81] https://youtu.be/MMiKyfd6hA0
[82] https://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_accel.html
[83] https://skyserver.sdss.org/dr1/en/astro/universe/universe.asp
[85] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stevie_Wonder%27s_Journey_Through_"The_Secret_Life_of_Plants" one person I know was so moved by this album it became his prized possession (after he assumed ownership of it so it was no longer mine, and held on so passionately I couldn't argue) he refused to let anyone listen to it unless they agreed to sit and listen to it all from start to finish.
[86] https://youtu.be/P6XIIjixDCU
[87] https://quantumartandpoetry.blogspot.com/?m=1
NUCLEAR ENERGY
some excellent channels on youtube which I found the most useful
Veritasium
​https://www.youtube.com/user/1veritasium
Pbsspacetime
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7_gcs09iThXybpVgjHZ_7g
Physics videos by Eugene Khutoryansky
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJ0yBou72Lz9fqeMXh9mkog
Some great videos by the World Science Festival channel also, an organisation headed by Brian Greene who stands out as a great, physicist and passionate communicator/teacher who makes physics great fun and easily understood by many people of different ages and levels of educatioon. 


The foundation I wish any funds to go to has yet to be confirmed. 


Some quotes from the usually misunderstood, misrepresented, mocked and misaligned genius Tesla who gave us alternating current which has driven every scientific advancement since.
https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/278.Nikola_Tesla
https://giphy.i/gifs/water-fountain-vortex-etS1aToF9GSY0 water gif
kissing ball structure
https://plus.maths.org/content/newton-and-kissing-problem.
Gif illustrating the drag on spacetime.
https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/ask-ethan-is-spacetime-really-a-fabric-6d775875deef
Amndmt 1 amended to simply "light is affected by gravity".
Amndmt 2 fourth point added 24th June 2019.
Gif with representation of the structure of the space time fabric. Added 30/06/2019
https://robertlovespi.net/
Teleportation references:
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1997/12/971215062803.htm
 
The study by the intercontinental team published in 16 August 2019 in "Science" Vol 365 issue 6454 pp. 664-668
DOI: 10.1126/science.aav8137
 
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/365/6454/664ttps://arxiv.org/abs/1707.00934


ANSWERS TO ANTICIPATED QUESTIONS
To answer possible questions which someone may have, yes I am aware it is now only a matter of time until someone builds a roller coaster suspended by super strong elastic and yes I'll probably have a go.
Also no I'm not a vampire. The mirror image would work for any being living truly in the moment.
No I do not understand mirror universes because I come from one, it's just logic reasoning.
Yes using time dimensions it is very possible alien spacecraft move around the upper atmosphere and outer space in different dimensions of time so remain hidden from detection. If they are I am certain that they are extremely intelligent and hence non violent so we have nothing to fear from them.
No I will not reconsider calling FUBs by the tem FUK for fundamental unifying kissing balls, it may be funny for 5 minutes but would likely be really annoying after that...as my brother would say...a bit like me. 
No the songs linked in my papers are not all my faves, some I never heard before but when I did some searches serendipity pulled out some pure gems. 
No, as far as I am aware Newton and Gregor were not obsessed with kissing balls...
It just happened to be one particular discussion of theirs which became very famous
No I will not reconsider calling FUBs by the tem FUK for fundamental unifying kissing balls, it may be funny for 5 minutes but would likely be really annoying after that...as my brother would probably say...a bit like me.
Yes in theory it will be possible to make "moonshine" using the teleport machine, yes possibly caffeine too although thats likely a little more complicated.
If the ether is a "perfect fluid" as some suggest quantum mechanics describes in the properties of the vacuum state I cannot confirm nor can I comment on whether or not that means it is 100% pure alcohol. 
This is likely the point where my brother would say "oh please, no more jokes."



POWERED BY 
Create your own unique website with customizable templates.
Get Started like RIKs the branches stay in position as we pas