ORIGINAL FOREWORD
Richard Feynman is famously quoted as saying [1] "If you think you understand quantum mechanics then you don´t understand quantum mechanics" This was true at the time but not any more, now we can. The essence of the supposed incompatibility of quantum mechanics and Relativity is due to a series of false conclusions, failure to  to understand that everything happens within the spacetime fabric and that spacetime is a physical lattice not empty space and incorrect interpretation of data. The truth can be summed up in one paragraph.

"The particle in quantum mechanics is a particle attached by flexible elastic type lines connecting each one to a uniform number of other quantum particles at every point in the field. The conclusion that  the particle nature of light (plus the Michelson and Morley experiments) rules out an ether is incorrect. There is an ether flazzma  but it does not permeate all of space rather it permeates all space inside the spacetime fabric, waves and vortices of energy move through it. These waves and vortices of energy cause the quantum particles to move relative to the particles they are connected to. At times they momentarily stretch away from each other, at times they bang against each other and at times they momentarily get stuck to each other as waves loop between two or more causing them to bind momentarily leading to "matter". Usually light passes forward through the field but once a loop is created the external light then bounces off and we see or detect matter. These momentary connections are relayed along the field and all affected particles oscillate as they are passed. Because we (ourselves collections of intertwined vibrations passing through the field) are moving relational to other waves, when we analyse quantum phenomenon because all collections of waves including us move at thousands of kilometres a second through the field it appears like the waves themselves are particles, in reality it is the oscillations which reveal the field particles form/shape and collectively this adds up to all the matter in the universe. Gravity is not a force per se but an effect due to quantum field strings being stretched and objects moving towards the point of least resistance. Beyond the quantum particle level there is no gravity and there is no infinite central singularity in a black body (not hole), hence why they grow in mass.   If singularities of infinite density did exist then black bodies would not grow in diameter once formed because mass already inside the theorised black hole would be drawn into the singularity. This doesn't happen however because as more matter and light is generated the black body grows in mass and size. The hidden variables which are universal in space and local in consciousness are mainly due to waves being in different states of phase in the physical realm 1: One of the hidden variables is the energy levels and physical size of waves in elements and compounds which vary dependent on the location and the amount of stretch in the fabric which we traditionally call time dilation: It is in fact space dilation which affects the MEASUREMENT of time, not time as a continuum. 2. consciousness is local at any position in the universe ie. thought moves instantly between any two (or more) conscious beings at any two (or more) places in the universe. In the field time is 13 dimensional which limits our range of observation, for example waves are detected only as they pass single points/areas in the field or in Quantum Entanglement where the observed event only reflects one possible viewpoint of many, the results observed reflect the events happening within the time bandwidth which is focused on. Other events happening in different dimensions of time go undetected. Quantum mechanics is often described as being counter intuitive but it is not, the mistake is thinking that the probabilistic nature refers to the particle, ie. that a particle exists in many different states and places at the same time  only becoming a certain particle when it is measured which is contrary to common sense and incorrect, once we understand the structure of the field, we know that the wave emanates out in all possible directions so while the Schrödinger Equation shows that the energy moving along one dimension must be conserved, always stay the same this leads to the logical understanding that the Universe is alive and creates energy at every point the wave passes. We simply can't detect or experience it as long as we focus along only one dimension of time but the interference pattern in the double slit experiment reveals the evidence. It is identifying the wave that is probabilistic. The wave is certain and consistent every time but the probability that we can detect a wave crest at a specific point/field particle is dependent on where we look and at what time we look there."
 
METAPHYSICS

Although energy cannot be found to be created or destroyed with measurement once we understand the limitations of the measurement problem and the common sense understanding of what is being revealed by the Schrödinger Equation it makes total sense and fits perfectly with an almighty God, the Universe as a creator. Energy is created all the time and there is nothing to indicate it will ever stop, logic tells us it can't, how the Universe came into being may never be understood but what we can understand is that there is no limit to life, the logic of consciousness in the field and the witness of visionaries/prophets tells us we currently glimpse only a tiny fraction of all that happens around us and we are alive forever in spirit even after and beyond biological death. 

EXPANDED ORIGINAL ABSTRACT

This paper asserts that the space time fabric/dark matter, electromagnetic field, cosmic web and the Higgs Field are all one. A gigantic spherical 13 dimensional lattice of hollow spheres connected by hollow expandable pipes through which a medium or flazzma flows, this lattice exists within a void, a true vacuum, which has no known boundaries. Waves move through the flazzma detected at points as photons in various energies. All matter is where these light waves have hit angles and segments get stuck as they create vortexes within field particles, the momentum of the spinning vortexes twisting the field particles. This causes the connecting pipes and field particles to be pulled in creating mass and other waves of photons then bounce off these rotating field particles rather than move through them The three forces of electromagnetism, the weak and strong nuclear forces all pertain to what happens within the fabric and it's flazzma. Gravity describes the effect these disturbances have on the field. With large massive objects like planets, suns and black bodies the vortexes torlectrons create negative pressure and the fabric is pulled in and clumped together, similar to elastic wool around a spool. The expansion of the universe is the stretch in the fabric being pulled into these clumps, the field pulls in all directions so the fabric must stretch. Other passing objects are then pulled in also as their path through the fabric is distorted and bent.  At certain close distances tparticles are drawn directly to the large massive object because the angles in their orbital paths merge with direct paths and so they veer off an orbital path to where intersecting angles are least and naturally move on a direct path to the point of least resistance, usually on the large celestial objects surface and remain there. Time has been viewed as one dimensional because like space we can only take one measurement at a time (and combine it with previous data in an awareness that space is multi dimensional) but time is in fact 13 dimensional and the evidence is clear in the interference pattern in the double slit experiment. Like matter moving through space it always moves forward but with variations in 13 dimensions. Matter and time have an inverse relationship because in order to increase our focus on matter to study and quantify specific activity we must take focus away from all other vibrations happening nearby so we decrease our range of time, so we get a limited view of all that happens in reality. When we increase our range of 13 dimensional time we lose our ability to measure objects as there are more vibrations happening creating a vibrational "cloud" which makes quantifying specific activity impossible. When we try to increase that focus on matter like detecting for which way in the double slit experiment we must narrow the range of time towards one dimension.

  
 SPRING TIME THEORY.
A Unified Field Theory that shows the space time fabric is composed of a lattice of balls which I will call RIKs [69] connected by spring/elastic type strands which I will call TREDDs [69(Named after two (of the many) comedians who helped keep my spirits up and make it through life long enough to make this paper possible, whose work can be seen here and referred back to for relief if anyone gets a sore head while reading this scientific paper. https://youtu.be/Hzf1_6ROslI Some may be finding the mind expansion uncomfortable, seriously, it overturns many assumptions previously believed to be facts and rewrites certain laws of nature, some in the big bang camp clearly are unsettled already. 

A gas/liquid/fluid type medium or flazzma [3] exists and permeates all space inside the RIKs and TREDDs. Energy moves  through the flazzma in waves creating matter and along the TREDDs as ripples creating vibrations detected as neutrinos/axions and gravitational waves. These TREDDs can expand when vibration/energy becomes entangled/clumped leading to the RIKs being pulled together and their connecting TREDDs being expanded which forms curvature, time and matter (time and matter being directly relational, with that being an inverse relationship in 13 dimensions, more matter leads to less detected time). Curvature in areas surrounding compacted groups of RIKs due to RIKs being pulled in at unequal tensions, where once there were corners they are bent eventually becoming perfectly curved at critical distances. These becoming effective when the expansion starts. Because the vortices of energy are moving through the field so fast (up to thousands of km per second) it gives the illusion that because these are observable as their force causes oscillations outlining the shape of the quantum particle field it appears like matter is made of particles. It is and we are in fact made of energy moving through the lattice of RIKs and TREDDs which become visible as excitations.
 


ORIGINAL INTRODUCTION
Spring Time Theory is proposing that Spacetime [4] The Higgs field [5] and dark matter [6] are in fact all the same thing. There is one field which is composed of a lattice of quantum particles “RIKs” joined together by stretchable coiled springs/elastic type strands “TREDDs” Each RIK is connected to 26 other RIKS via 13 strands of TREDDs that run through each point in spacetime like seen in the image at the top of the page. 27 RIKs connected altogether at every point in the field.  (After extensive research it is my understanding that the smallest oscillations of these 27 RIKs are probably the same as the axion particles predicted by Quinn and Peccei in 1977 [66]. However they are not themsleves axions for two reasons, firstly because electrons, neutrinos/, gluons are also the same single particle in different states of energy and oscillation (mass), so using the term axion is positive as it makes that link to dark matter and the field but on the other hand not quite describing the field particles in all states like at rest because these axions have mass. So it would be incorrect to use the term axion as it explains the field particles with mass which they don't have at other states of zero or close to zero energy like in "outer space".  So I will continue with the new name RIKs .)
All observations of different tparticles of the standard model are a result of different groups of waves and combinations of vibrations passing through these RIKs of the field which become visible as excitations. Usually light passes forward through the field but once a loop is created the external light then bounces off and we see or detect matter.  The proposed graviton does not exist. Gravity [7] is a mechanism of the field where RIKs as matter are pulled together and move to where the distance between TREDDs is shortest these being where vortices of energy are gathered together as mass/wobble pulling the RIKs and TREDDs of spacetime in. The resulting stretch forcing matter to follow the path of least resistance demonstrated in this short video https://youtu.be/GVVVbqlQQbc in which the free moving metal ring represents an electron orbital [8] the smaller ring represents a massive body with significant gravitational pull pulling in the strands of spacetime, the elastic represents the strands in the spacetime fabric.

Here is an analogy which should make the new paradigm easy to understand. If we are on a big boat say a ferry or ocean cruiser and we are docked waiting to move off so we look out at the ocean. The boat rocking gently sends us to sleep and we wake up a while later, if we look out the window we may see lots of other big boats pass us so we wave at the people on the boat to welcome them thinking they must be coming to shore then however we take a walk on deck we see we are in the middle of the ocean and the other boats weren't moving they had put down anchors, we had set sail hours ago and we had woken and sailed past them thinking we were still docked and they were moving, it is a common optical illusion experienced on boats. Until now we didn't realise the particles were stationary and what we see is waves of energy moving through them shaking them. Normally we don't see these RIKs as light passes straight through them without shaking or twisting them significantly. But with high energies the vortices cause the RIKs to start to twist so light can no longer pass straight through, instead it bounces off  and we see them. As the waves move shaking the RIKs the wave can be seen as every RIK passed will shake. Just like if we get two people to hold a blanket and one person shakes it it will send a ripple which we can see travel along the blanket. These waves are what scientists have been viewing as particles. However in matter the particles don't travel,  just as in classical physics terms the particles in the fabric of the blanket don't travel, it's the wave that travels.  We are made of collections of vortices of energy and all standard model particles  are waves or vortices of energy moving through the field. 

It's a bit like the flat Earth round Earth problem. Initially mankind thought the world stays still and the stars and sun moved around us. Then with great philosophers like Aristarchus we discovered the world is moving and moving around the sun, it was an optical illusion. Even though Aristarchus proved it and other Greek mathematicians proved the world was round about 500 years BC most people thought the idea was just ridiculous, they had a mental block, perhaps the thought of spinning through space scared them so they didn't look at the evidence, so the science was largely  ignored, the literature did not get widely printed so it didn't spread for 2,000 years until the concept resurfaced and was reasserted by medieval age scientists and eventually after a lot of pain and resistance with people getting first laughed at and mocked then later imprisoned and tortured by medieval scientists, it was finally accepted. Now most intelligent trustworthy people able to think logically and clearly who look at all the evidence can recognise when people and evidence are/is trustworthy can see the overwhelming weight of evidence shows it is round and the Earth revolves around the sun which revolves around Sag-A our galaxy's central massive black body. Now on the quantum level where we observe the tiny visible shapes called "particles" that make up everything using microscopes and now computers I have discovered/realised that it is not the particles that are moving it is waves and vortices of energy moving through the field particles, again it is another optical illusion. This time scientists have been having a hard time understanding it because it appears to be single particles. The new discovery is that detection/measurement is extremely limited at the quantum level. It is not that particles are quantised units rather it is the measurement/detection that is quantised. So these waves are rippling out in every direction but we only detect those which we focus on and until now scientists have only been focusing on one time dimension. It is perhaps an unsettling thought or a deep rooted fear or irritating for any scientist of any era when they feel  challenged. If something at first glance seems impossible then looking at the evidence unsettles them and/or makes a lot of their work seem insignificant and in hindsight, full of mistakes they simply won't look. Also perhaps because so much of what they believe seems so convincing and so many other contemporary intellectuals believe the same it is maybe difficult to accept so many people could be so wrong and one relatively uneducated person can be right.  The reality is there is no need to worry in fact it's a very exciting discovery and everyone makes mistakes.  It seems also that because science has become so involved with politics and money it means researchers fight viciously against any perceived threat to their funding sources, with the vast majority of funding going on research to find evidence supporting the big bang/outwards expanding universe this is a tragedy for scientific curiosity and open discussion. The magnitude of the strength of the anti science lobby controlling much of physics is evident by the fact that certain very influential individuals make it clear that even Einstein would not be allowed into the media and the discussion if he still croticised the big bang.  The scientific principle is prove us wrong and according to Richard Feynman "If the model doesn't work we look for a new model" to quote one popular celebrity physicist who stated in a public event at the Institute for art and ideas [113] "It is true, there is no point doubting the big bang model, we don't let people up here on the stage if they doubt that part of the model." This despite the fact it violates almost every known law of physics and when sci-fi "inflation" is used to fix it, it still doesn't work.
Einstein himself stated“ To raise new questions, new possibilities, to regard old problems from a new angle, requires creative imagination and marks real advance in science.” – Albert Einstein


THE ORIGIN OF THE PHYSICAL UNIVERSE?


Figuring out he genesis of the Universe itself is in many ways a feat beyond the understanding of man. Why? Considering we have no concept of time and consciousness without a beginning it seems to me impossible and perhaps arrogant to claim we "know" how everything began. For me this was the 1st aspect of the big bang that made it stand out as untrue, even the big bang explains nothing about the origin of time or matter and physicists saying "it just happened" is a violation of common sense and the law of cause and effect.  Given particle physicists provide no explanation for energy and cannot unite all the 4 fundamntal forces into a physical system that works it seems to me futile and asking for problems to propose a model as fact when there are so many anomalies, contradictions and violations of physics in it. Even physically the lack of any  boundaries of the infinite void that we can imagine exists outside our universe seems to me to be beyond any human understanding, I for one cannot concieve infinity in space or time (eternity, even in "Heaven" was my worst nightmare as a child) and I have yet to meet anyone who can. It seems to me that is a question for a far greater intelligence than can perhaps ever be articulated in words or pictures (although I propose a machine to possibly communicate with the Universe itself who may be able to answer these questions for us). However the origin and growth of the physical universe from the existence of a physical "thing" is one we can perhaps explain.  It seems to me the answer lies somewhere in the dynamics described by the mathematics of Ricci flow and the Perelman Operation (Grigori Perelman's [107] proof to what was previously a conjecture) 
To me the fact that non human consciousness is proven to exist in the double slit experiment indicates the Universe is an organic tissue and was in sime way born. Again this leads to the chicken and the egg type endless circle, what came before the Universe and consciousness. Where did consciousness and the initial physical body come from? 
Questions I cannot bring myself to even attempt to answer, so what I begin with is a soft physical sphere that has the force of consciousness acting upon it and has some kind of consciousness within it. If the void is filled with an ether then perhaps the sphere in some way draws in the ether. Perhaps the sphere in some way was formed by dual consciousness in the ether trying to interact but were unable to do so without a physical medium. The interaction perhaps became turbulent and concentrated at a specific location and this caused a vortex of some kind. Perhaps one element of consciousness became entrapped in the vortex and the other outside. This in some way led to a physical barrier between the two. The force on the inside trying to escape and the force on the outside trying ro enter. 
Starting from a maleable, soft material sphere I imagine there is a pulse at the heart of the Universe.  Using Ricci flow and from my understanding of the concepts in Grigori's work, if we reverse what Grigori Perelman proved we have that maleable sphere being stretched by the conscious force inside. When it manages to breach a point in the surface it stretches and a spike extends out, at a certain point it stops but the flow forces another sphere to form at the end of the spike. These remain attached and now we have 2 spheres attached by a strand and within them all there is the ether drawn in somehow from the void. The conscious energy is now greater inside and each sphere forces another spike and another sphere so we have 4 spheres. The 2 new ones are still young and fresh and form 2 more attachments to the other 2 while maintaining an attachment to it's origin. Now all are connected in a simple object made of 4 spheres. Again the energy continues to build and more extrustions and more new spheres are forced into existence.  Each new sphere attaches to any other sphere it comes into contact with in it's infancy and a strand that stretches is formed between them. This continues and the fabric grows. The energy builds and generates ripples as it grows, at small scales this creates massive amounts of vortices within the spheres in the fabric which in turn creates more turbulence and even more vortices. This causes a sub system of push and pull within the structure which grows. Energy is multiplied as is shown in the mathematics I provide to explain mass being formed by vortices in the fabric. Each sphere acts in a sense like a monopole once energy has entered because energy exits all possible ways in/out with the same force that it entered with through one.  So it isn't truly a monopole because it needs energy to enter but once entered it produces energy going outwards. 
     So as energy arrives at the outer surface of the fabric it reaches a barrier and forces new extrusions which form new spheres. I imagine this is constantly happening at the very edge of the Universe as we speak and will continue happening forever. So the fabric will continue to grow for as long as time exists and every new sphere, which is the dark matter particle or the RIK will form a new elastic type connection with every other RIK it comes into contact with. The spheres become hard and rigid primarily due to their geometric shape and the fact that any kinetic any vibrations reinforce their shape while the connections remain elastic as an vibrations stretch and deform their shape so they never have enough time to become rigid. In a sense their consciousness never becomes constant enough to hold a strong shape, however the spheres when knocked reverberate with internal waves which defines a consciousness that recognises a sphere and that sphere therefore becomes rigid. The connecting threads or TREDDs are constantly pulled and pushed, stretched and squeezed so is their awareness of their shape, it is aware of the connection and the elastic nature and the length between the two. 
So at the outside the outer layer of RIKs continues to grow while at the centre logic indicates that the source does also. Not in form or shape but in energy. With waves of energy constantly moving into the RIKs at one level of magnitude and leaving at that magnitude multiplied by 26 the energy growth is phenomenal.  Near the genesis of the fabric this allowed for rapid growth and expansion of the structure (Note: not anywhere near the scale proposed by inflation as used in the big bang hypothesis, we already know that energy is limited to form matter even dark matter at the Planck time limit. Matter or light CANNOT move or grow at any speed which violates this speed limit.) so as energy arrived at the outer surface of the macro structure that surface grew and logic indicates that it still grows today.  At the core energy constantly builds and within a certain range of time the push outwards of energy at the surface tugs against the vacuum energy of the vortices of energy moving at the core.  The core itself eventuall pulls in so much that there comes a point where the connecting strands are stretched so much that their diameters contract so much that there is no space for the fluid/ether inside to pass, so it can no longer move inside the TREDDs and we get the first formation of a black body (previously mistaken for black holes which violate common sense and just about everything we know about physics). Given the Universe would have been so young there would not have been enough expanse for neutrons to form so it would not have been a neutron star Pulsar (I explain pulsars elsewhere as being more akin in dynamics to strobe lights than lighthouses). 
This primary black body or dark star still had energy multiplying inside and logically since no more ether could be drawn in via the TREDDs the RIKs began to be drawn in. Once drawn in energy has more space to move and the negative or vacuum pressure is momentarily relieved but only for a Panck unit of time before each newly engulfed RIK is bombarded with more energy and thereupin more space is needed and more RIKs are pulled in.  This logically has been happening ever since, happening every second and minute of our existence so the black body/dark star at the core of the Universe may be larger even than our visible Universe. 
Around this primordial black body of course the geometry of the field meant that massive amounts of vortices/matter would form. This would have been contained/held within a certain region around the first black body, just like matter is contained around our own sun. What I imagine happened next is a process where that black body created light, heat and matter as we see with our own sun. Constant light, regular solar mass ejections and the evidence indicates that when there is enough built up energy we get massive solar mass ejections or "Novas". My hypothesis is that within some of these larger Nova events enough matter is emitted in a dense enough "bubble" that it has a small black body at its core, this black body perhaps formed while still within the layers of the sun. This "bubble" is released in a nova event and shoots out into space where it eventually slows down and settles into an orbit around the sun. The surface cools down as it meets the coldness of space and a hard crust or planet surface is formed. This is where I imagine all the planets came from. SAG-A perhaps coming from a superfast ejection from a black body spinning at near light speed sending it perhaps millions of light years away from it's source before settling down and beginning to grow in cycles of heat and dark giving birth to more stars and planets within the Milky Way galaxy. They in turn give birth to more over time and the galaxy grows in mass and size. 


While the Jean's hpothesis [109] proposed as an explanation for star formation seems to make sense there is a few things about it that to me seem not to make sense.
Firstly everything in space is moving. This causes a few problems for the Jean's hypothesis.  While physicists propose that the Jean's hypothesis has gas contained in an enclosed space I can find no explanation from physicists as to what that enclosure is comprised of.  If we look at the model which claims to explain the formation of planets from the same model we see distant gas rings orbiting young stars.  These are constantly moving with no possible way for an enclosed sphere to form. In a sense it would be similar to try to get objects circulating in a whirlpool on water to form one object, say for example leaves, it will not happen, they may occasionally collide but will disperse again.  The only concentration of leaves likely to be near the centre but even here they are pulled under and pushed out almost as soon as they arrive at the centre.
The other problem is the charge of the gas molecules. I can see no way that the repellant charge of electrons which is a substantially strong force can be overcome by the extremely weak force of gravity. The only way I could see such events happening is in an enclosed system where there is massive pressure applied and the gas slowed down so much they are forced to combine.  Even here there are lots of counter dynamics at play, any combination is likely to be weak in nature and due to having more electrons it's repellant force increases. In space while being extemely cold at around an average 2-3 kelvin the gas tparticles are constantly moving.  From what I can deduce even in a temporary vortice of gas from turbulence the movement and charge of any gas in a cloud is much greater than any attractive force gravity can overcome.  
So I cannot find any way the Jean's Hypothesis is credible unless we bring in an assuption of an enclosed space where pressure can be applied. An assumption which has no basis in physics, in reality once we let go of that assumption which calls for an imaginary boundary that does not exist in reality the hypothesis falls apart.  It may have been the best model without something better (like the big bang held together by science fiction) but now that I have a model that explains everything with no assumptions it seems to me time to say goodbye to the Jean's model at least until an enclosed sphere in space is identified. The gas clouds we see from observations of distant young solar systems seem to me to move out to form orc clouds similar to what we have around our own solar system.  Each planet emitted from our sun is eventually also pushed out and further away from our sun over time. The anomaly of the spin of Venus seems to me due to the fact it is the youngest planet. Given it is more massive it would have had more momentum and so was ejected and able to move further out from Mercury but not as far as Earth which has been here longer. However it was spinning in the other direction and has not had time to settle down and spin in the same direction as all the other planets or to become drawn into a slow approach towards a tidal lock like Mercury seem to be.  
In summary of this section I see the birthing of stars as the system of propagation in the Universe using no assumptions in a model which can be traced back to the origin of the Universe. With no science fiction imaginary spheres needed nor any violations of what we know about physics where all the forces of nature are unified and accounted for, where the quantum structure of spacetime and gravity (quantum gravity) is explained concisely. Where the source and nature of energy itself is described and accounted for.  


 THE MATHEMATICAL MODEL WITH THE EXPLANATION OF THE MAGNETIC MONOPOLES
UNDERSTANDING ENERGY AND MASS

The essence of the mathematical model actually needs very little of anything new apart from the equation for gravity as the true source of cosmic redshift not an expanding Universe. Also the equation to deduce the shape of the manifolds that make up what are currently viewed as standard tparticles. Also Einstein's equivalence principle is incorrect.  All of which I provide in a basic form, no doubt the experts can make them prettier than I can. 

Einsteins Equivalence Principle is wrong G≠a 
t∝E
As illustrated in this video
https://youtu.be/8L-t8Si5ka8
Einsteins equivalency principle where he proposed that gravity is equal to acceleration is incorrect as STT shows. It is the input of energy that dictates the measurement of time. In atomic clocks it is the length of the radius in the electron orbital that dictates how much time is recorded when a steady flow of current is forced in. A dilated electron orbital existing near the surface of a large gravitational object where there is massive expansion of the spacetime fabric will require more energy to become saturated and emit a photon, therefore a long increment in time will be detected.  Conversely the same electron orbital in "outer space" will be contracted and requires a small amount of energy to saturate it and emit a photon, thereby measuring more increments in time.
Also using the idea of an harmonic oscillator in a sealed box travelling at the speed of light STT shows that time is still theoretically measurable and the speed of the passage of time is again dependent on the amount of energy applied to the device.  If we use a photon itself and every peak in its wave is detected as an incrememnt of time then if we were travelling at the speed of light the photon would move straight up and down in line with us.  However more increments of time will be recorded if we fire a gamma ray photon, less will be recorded if we fire a photon at visible light intensity and even less time will be detected if we fire a radio wave into the device, all 3 photons will show a different passage of time at the same rate of acceleration. 
It is energy and/or mass (which is energy contained) that dictates the rate of recorded time. 




In Einsteins acceleration equation in General Relativity the accelleration at close distances is correct but at long ranges we must account for the gravitational lenses that we view the universe THROUGH, so at long distances the value for acceleration is actually describing magnification which increases with the growth of gravitational objects like stars and black bodies pulling the surrounding fabric into smaller surfaces with increase curvature giving the appearance of an expanding Universe. The accelleration is the exponential growth of gravity, more gravity gives more power to pull in energy, more energy leads to more gravity and on it goes. 
Quantum mechanics and Relativity are both correct, it is the interpretations that are incorrect. The probability in quantum mechanics is not where a particle exists it is where a vortex will be detected passing through a line of dark matter particles.
In regards to black bodies which are not black holes Einsteins equation which suggests the existence of black holes has a limit. That limit is the Planck limit, once we reach the Planck limit the physical size of these objects begins to grow, there are no singularities of infinite density, if there were these objects would not grow in size for a start, the energy would be drawn into the infinity. The singularity is in fact the event horizon where regular matter can neither escape OR enter, there is an infinite loop at the event horizon which continually grows so energy cannot complete a loop and mark an increment in time, so mechanical time stops and becomes impossible at the surface. Inside energy is created as more dark matter is "eaten" by the black body/dark star. The understanding that energy quantised is a push equates energy to heat/friction so the idea that these, the most energy dense therefore heat intense regions of space which spin at up to at least 1/5th the speed of light are cold black holes is both illogical and untenable.
The math needed to understand the principle is very minimal, there are 27 transparent, dark matter particles connected to each other at every point in the spacetime/dark matter lattice by transparent elastic type pipes. Through the particles and pipes flows a perfect transparent fluid an ether. The dark matter particles are aligned in 13 dimensions so energy has a limit of 13 directions at the Planck level. When regular matter is formed it has 12 dimensions. 
Maxwells equations describe the movement of the ether inside the lattice. 

As can clearly be seen in the video evidence of the double slit experiment time and matter appear to have an inverse relationship. An electron acting in time like a particle leaves a mark in matter like a wave, when it acts in time like a wave it leaves a mark in matter like a particle.

ENERGY
c=tdp (t:measured time, distance, pressure) 
c³=t.V.p+0- (t, Volume, positive/negative pressure)
E=c³
Einsteins cosmological constant Lamda is effectively the pressure within the flazzma. This fluctuates with the compaction and surrounding stretch of the fabric/lattice but overall is uniform in our region of the Universe.
Here is why total energy E=c³.

The dynamics of the universe can be broken down into 4 different entities 
Space measured as distance in 3  main dimensions x y z
Time measured in the physical realm by intervals, seconds, which are fixed to one dimension of space for measurement but which cannot truly measure time only relativistic time. Yet we now have equations and logic that show using mathematics that time dilates in 13 dimensions with an inverse relationship to matter. Also we can verify that time is 13 dimensional in variations of the double slit experiment.Einstein showed time is variable relevant to positions in space and it is also variable relative to consciousness in 3 dimensions physical length and quality defined by 2 values difficult to define in physical/numbers but are experimentally verifiable, so for now I will use the term wide and slim for dilatable time within the same spacially measured second. These 3 can each have positive or negative values.
Pressure: 3 states  positive neutral negative again these each can have positive or negative values in the conscious realm.
Energy: excess, sufficient, insufficient. With energy all 3 can have a positive or negative value.  A mid point can be fixed for physical systems but cannot be for conscious systems because it's value in consciousness is subjective. We can determine how much energy is needed to play music at a certain decibel (insufficient energy will not produce a certain high decibel while excess energy will exceed it) but it is subjective whether that volume of noise is sufficient, insufficient or excessive. 

To condense the essence of the theory we have four entities existing in the space time fabric: time, space, pressure and energy.
https://youtu.be/p_UegZStJ78
 in the quantum realm energy is a measure of the total number of impacts either by molecules in the flazzma or if these impacts come in great numbers they become waves which impact against the walls/skin of the spacetime fabric leading to what we detect as electrelectromagnetism and matter. Matter is because segments of these waves get separated from the main wave and stuck in loops/vortices. Electricity is because the waves impact, twist to form torlectrons and move the flazzma through matter.
Energy is determined by the value of the three others  time, space, pressure. This can be represented visually by one of each at each corner of a triangle t v and p with E represented by the space in the triangle. All 3 have 3 properties time and space are both 3 dimensional while pressure can be + neutral or -. But we always measure using one dimension/property so c is measured along 1 dimension of time t, 1 dimension of space distance d and 1 value of pressure neutral. c=td and until now pressure has not been factored in because physicists assumed the pressure in a vacuum is constant but it is not,  not once energy (light/matter) has been applied to the vacuum. There is flazzma in the space time fabric. So when light travels through the void in which the space time fabric exists in, it's speed is constant relative to the space within the fabric that it travels through and variable relative to the space in the void. This is because the spacetime fabric can be stretched or compacted within any fixed area of the void.

Energy (number of impacts/pushes) increases or decreases dependent on the 3 others: any increase in time and/or space and/or pressure and the energy (number of impacts) increases. Likewise any decrease in time and/or space and/or pressure and the energy decreases.
If the units of any 2 remain fixed any decrease in the other gives less energy, conversely any increase gives more energy.  
So
If time and space remain fixed any decrease in pressure gives less energy, conversely any increase in pressure gives more energy.
If pressure and space remain fixed any decrease in time gives less energy, conversely any increase in time gives more energy.
If time and pressure remain fixed any decrease in space gives less energy, conversely any increase in space gives more energy.
Energy is in essence the amount of movement in time and space dependent on the pressure marked by the number of collisions. So the speed of light is constant and any "object" travelling towards it causes an increase in pressure in the flazzma which slows the wave down relative to the amount of space in the void it is travelling through but equal in speed relational to the amount of space it travels through in the fabric.  
Any "object" travelling away from the wave causes a decrease in pressure in the flazzma causing a negative pressure "suction" affect speeding up the wave relative to the amount of space in the void that it is travelling through but equal in speed relational to the space it travels through in the fabric.
All have a relationship with each other. For the energy to remain constant an increase in value in 1 decreases the combined value of all the others. Adjust the angles in any ratio in the triangle and the proportions of time, space and pressure move with the others keeping the same internal energy. if we  keep the same proportions/angles but increase or decrease the size of the sides we increase or decrease the amount of energy within. 
If we increase/decrease any 2 of the 3 entities the third must increase/decrease in the opposite direct proportion to the other 2 entities' overall change in order to maintain the same energy and vice versa. The only way we can truly increase or decrease the energy is to vary the overall length of the sides of the triangle.  If we increase the quantity of t we must decrease p and stay in the same volume of space to get the same energy. If p and V stay constant but we increase the amount of t we get more energy (occuring over a longer period of time). 
 
To understand this we must consider or understand that there is flazzma INSIDE the space time fabric which is a lattice within a void and that energy is a measure of the frequency and momentum of collisions or pushes. Pushes either by molecules of the flazzma against each other or pushes of the dark matter fabric by waves of varying pressure moving through the flazzma.  The more pressure/momentum P in any specific volume V and/or the more volume in a specific pressure the more energy there is I.e. the more pushes occur within a fixed time. Increase any 1 of these and in order for the energy to remain constant the combined value of the other 2 must decrease.  For example time is needed for the wave to travel from a to b. So the total energy or number of collisions increases by the rise in volume of a fixed pressure and it also increases with the rise of pressure within a fixed volume and in both cases with any increase in time so the speed of light is not just the distance by the time it is the distance by the time divided or multiplied by the pressure because pressure can be positive neutral or negative.  c=dtp where p is either a positive, zero or negative number. So the number of pushes (energy) is (E=d³ x p+0- x t) we have a symbol for d³ which is V volume the value of p is defined by +, 0 or - but we have until now no value for 3 dimensions of time so here is what we could use. As time can be long or short in length it is also expressed in terms of "quality" which is usually associated with wealth in physical entities so we could use the symbol W for time in all it's dimensions or simply stay with t. (NOTE: Particle physicists in general have been having serious problems dealing qith and accepting multi dimensional time so I have removed much of the work on the deeper descriptions of multidimensional time and try to present as much as I can in a linear one dimensional time paradigm) The less pressure (congestion in the flazzma) the faster the wave moves through a fixed volume of space in a fixed time.  Energy is created in every RIK as a wave of collisions/energy passes through. Rather than being divided between the forward exits it exits all 26 possible exits with the same energy it enters with through one entrance  ie. energy is multiplied/propagated out from the core at the rate of 3³ that it goes in ie. the RIK is not truly a magnetic monopole but it's activity basically fulfils the same logic as a positive monopole outputting energy. Physicists traditionally describe it as a "monopole" So actually the monopole is not truly a monopole although the dynamics are similar, there is input "xe" but the outgoing energy is amplified at the rate of x.e.t³.  I describe it as "energy is created in 3 dimensional time and 3 dimensional space". That energy (number of collisions)  after exiting the RIK remains the same or decreases with the stretch in the TREDDs because while space in the void is constant everywhere the same space in the fabric becomes less when stretched moving more volume of the fabric into a specific volume of the void known as mass and leaving less volume of the fabric in the surrounding space of the void where the stretch is. . Less space means less pressure means less energy/collisions. In the Dirac equation the monopoles exist at either end of the Dirac string but knowing the structure of the field we know that the string is an actual physical pipe so effectively they are just 2 quantised poles of the dipole. One is the inlet and one is the outlet for the flazzma.

So in an equation the speed of light is not just distance by time it is also by pressure. c=tdp 
when we use delta then x is in fact representative of space V because we know any point in space is 3 dimensional if we magnify enough. In pragmatic terms in quantum physics the position x is V quantized to the field particle, the RIK. So c³=t.V.p
the speed of light is based on the values of these 3, dependant on how we want to express or define it. So regardless of how we wish to define the speed of light it remains constant within any system in the void so the total amount of energy in any system or space within the void is.
E=c³


The pressure felt in time dilates in the spiritul/conscious realm not just the physical realm. As Einstein showed the measurement of time "the second" cannot truly measure time because the detected movement of the physical measuring device say the "hand" on the clock is variable relative to the observer the space between the hand and the observer, the amount of mass in the locality and now as STT reveals the pressure between time and matter. So time and space also exert pressure on each other and as we see clearly in the video evidence of the double slit experiment time and matter appear to have an inverse relationship. 
  Another thing this paper shows is that time dilation is also space dilation. When time appears to slow down it is because the MEASUREMENT  of time is affected. It is because the electron orbitals are literally dilated. Given the solution to quantum entanglement we know it is not time itself that slows down it is the measurement of time that slows down proportional to the mass. The greater the mass the slower time appears to tick. To imagine it consider an ant as a metaphor for one torlectron in an electron orbital. As explained in this video https://youtu.be/iViiLyfyLSc
This ant always marches or moves at a fixed speed just like light does. So the ant begins marching around a balloon it completes one circuit in say 20 seconds but now the balloon is inflated every time it completes a circuit. So in a very short time the balloon is considerably larger and it gets to the stage where it takes the same ant at the same speed a minute to complete a circuit. If the ant is pushing the hand of a clock on the balloon one second every time it completes a loop then every time the balloon is further inflated the ant passes and pushes the hand so that loop takes longer with every inflation and on the clock time appears to slow down. It doesn't of course.
This explains the neutral H problem of the suns photosphere. Physicists have made the error of assuming that H would likely be transformed into H+ at the same temperature on all celestial bodies but this is not so. Because there is so much time and space dilation at the surface regions of celestial bodies due to this being where the expansion of the universe is it takes more energy to saturate "tparticles" and electron orbitals. Just like if the ants on the balloon linked up in a full circle around the balloon it would require that more ants join to keep the loop intact as the balloon grows. So it is with neutral H on the sun, because there are thousands of times more time and space dilation in the suns photosphere than there is in the Earth's atmosphere it requires immensely more energy and temperature to transform H into H+.  
MASS
In its most basic theoretical form mass is a description of the amount of compaction of the spacetime fabric caused by a torlectron (or torlectrons in manifold loops) arriving at angles twisting the field intersection the "RIK" x, the total number of field particles/intersections "RIKs"within the group (standard model particle) nx, the overall momentum of all these field dark matter  particles interacting p by any time dilation 3t one for each dimension of time. In one torlectron that is one photon arriving above a certain energy and hitting above the critical angle with no internal time dilation as detected in the electron.

2 PLACES WHERE 137 IS FOUND

In this sense the number 1/137 represents the critical angle a  single photon hits a RIK which causes the vortex to begin within. Detected as an electron which is the building block of most other standard model particles with larger mass. Above this critical angle of 137° and/or below the energy needed for an electron the wave passes on as a photon without creating a vortex in the flazzma. At this critical angle within a certain range where the Rik is oriented so the energy leaves at an angle that is  137°-137.5° off centre from where it entered, where the pressure is Einsteins cosmological constant Lamba and where there is specific energy the vortex is formed and the RIKs begin twisting back and forth with relatively constant energy as the vortex passes along between RIKs. With higher energy it takes a greater angle to create the vortex always keeping to this "golden ratio" 1/137 of energy to angle.   Where the energy is higher and the angle more acute, beyond the range necessary for the formation of the vortex, part of the wave creates the vortex which rotates within the RIK and as it comes back to the point of entry it deflects any remaining energy in the wave back into the field as a lower energy wave detected at points as photons.

In the equation a=e²/4π the e² represents the total energy on the surface area of the wave (perpendicular to the RIK it is hitting or leaving) defined by the pressure/momentum in the flazzma and the diameter of the TREDDs it is is passing through e², 4π is the total surface area of the RIK.  
I knew all along that there was a critical energy to angle ratio which leads to the formation of the vortexes of light that we know as matter. This angle 137.5° I came across in a proposed theory of Everything as energy exchange [87]articulated by a Theoretical physicist Nick Harvey whose theory although significantly different than mine correctly has photon interaction as the basic process behind all of physical phenomena in the universe and his idea of energy exchange is to me essentially the same principle as the change of the form of energy from forward moving to looping. Nick shows in his explanations that the angle relative to the radius of the electron also is the angle that we find in the Fibonachi sequence when it is plotted in two dimensions. What I am proposing is that using Nick's explanation of the golden ratio relative to the Fibonachi sequence coupled with what I have been saying for over a year (now 2 and a half years) that matter like time always moves forward, turns the Fibonachi model into a 3 dimensional model. It is the movement of matter forward through spacetime that gives the spiral which increases in the Fibonachi ratio. Matter is gathered and held by living souls as we move forward through spacetime. As we spiral forward we gather as much physical matter as possible which is a constant of spirituality/consciousness, that is we constantly seek to secure as much physical and conscious "information" as possible to remain within the realm of life for as long as possible. Because we are constantly spinning forward through space we are fortunate/blessed with a place in the Universe where matter is travelling at that critical speed through spacetime which allows life to exist. 

. 

m=OY.∠.x.p.t
Mass is dependent on the amount of torlectrons OY, the angle it is moving through the Riks, the number of RIKs in the risk manifold, the pressure and the time dilation.
Luckily we know the value of one single field particle excited into a state with detectable mass, the electron, so we get 
M=0.511Mev/c².ne.nx.p.3Δt
When we break down the detected energy in the electron we getM=(4/3.πc³--El Mev/c²).ne.nx.p.3Δt 
E=mc² is slightly incorrect or misleading. E in this equation is DETECTED energy only, it is not a description of total energy exerted by the force.

What is an electron volt? I would describe it as accummulation of pushes (quantised to one RIK/dark matter particle, that would be a push). The force of a light wave hitting a bend, that bend in this case being the curved surface of the RIK/dark matter particle, which pushes the RIK forward to push another RIK as it is moved by the impact, and on it goes pushing one RIK into another. Of course even an electron "at rest" is the torlectron moving through trillions of dark matter particles a second, pushing each one as it passes, so fast in such a small space that it is beyond our detection physically, we can only understand it by deduction. The electron volt is a measure of the push, while not a measure of the quantised push it is reflective of the dynamic of that quantised push which is what we deduce when we extrapolate backwards from what is measured.  So mass is the total inwards compaction of the spacetime fabric as a result of the twisting caused by the momentum of the internal pushing generated by waves and vortexes in the ether/flazzma, which pulls in the surroundings determined by how many pushes and the combined momentum of those pushes detected. As I use the time unit of a tik, the time it takes the torlectron to travel one line of RIKs divided by their diameter we have 511000 pushes (523800- the energy equivalent to 12800 pushes undetected lost as neutrino waves) within the unit of time used to measure mass or π/6.10^6 per time unit. Meaning 523800 specific lengths of a single line of RIKs (multiplied by z an as yet unknown/undefined number of individual RIKs) are passed through for each tik 
So lets breakdown the mass of an electron working backwards to find out what might be going on. As we are working backwards the logic may not be initially apparent and may even seem nonsensical but should become clear as the explanation develops. So going on the reasoning that it was 3 dimensional time (relativistic time not time as an entity which is universal) at work in the double slit experiment I applied the formula for the volume of a sphere to an electron (going on the reasoning that it was reflective of one spherical RIK by z an undefined multiple to make it detectable in the macro realm) and got 0.5238mev/c² or π/6Mev/c²  0.511+0.0128Mev/c² (0.0128Mev/c² representing the amount of undetected neutrinos generated), which is 0.5238mev/c²
4/3πr³ r being the time it takes the torlectron to pass through one line of spherical RIKs divided by 2, d/2 or r giving us
4/3 x 3.141592653...... x 0.5³ (0.125)
0.5238 or π/6 in one quantized line or dimension of spacetime, the RIK in one defined unit of time t at neutral pressure.
 so 
E=π/6Mev/c² then when we multiply both sides by c² we have the total detected and deduced energy in one dimension of space and one of time E multipled by the 2 other macro dimensions c² equals 
Ec²= π/6Mev.ne.nx.Δp.3Δt
E logically is one dimensional representation of energy so true overall energy is one dimensional representation of energy multiplied by the other 2 dimensions so true E (detected and deduced as opposed to standard E which is only detected energy) is E x c²
E=c³
The loss of the equivalent kinetic energy of 12800 pushes accounted for by the ripples of kinetic waves moving out through the fabric detected as neutrinos as the torlectron passes.  


So we get 511000ev or 511000 pushes of dark matter particles (which is an extrapolated unit based on the single torlectron being pushed through a set and as yet undefined number of RIKs within the time unit corresponding to a unit of one electron volt) detected with the loss of the equivalent kinetic energy of 12800 electron volts as neutrinos which ripple out undetected in the 12 other dimensions of spacetime which cannot be detected (due to the measurement problem, that we can only measure in one dimension of space and time in any discrete act of measurement) only deduced using logical reasoning. 
E=c³=π/6.10^6ev/c².t.d.p
E=the total amount of energy involved in 511000 (by an as yet undefined number of RIKs/dark matter particles) pushes of a line of RIKs within the unit of time used to measure mass. 


To put it another way. 
Light is waves in the flazzma detected as energy moving outwards in one dimension but deduced as moving in macro or Euclidian space in 3 dimensional waves with no detectable confinement/resistance through the space time lattice other than that limited by C. Mass is manifested when these waves of light travelling out from the source in one direction hits bends causing resistance, leading to the formation of the torlectron and the subsequent wobble due to the momentum of the torlectron passing through the line of field particles "RIKs" and sending ripples out as neutrinos through  their connecting threads "TREDDs". So mass is the resulting detectable compaction of field particles "RIKs" caused by light confined within curvature so we must use π (perfect curvature) to quantify that confinement. Light still travels and propagates within the RIKs in 3 dimensions but we measure the mass using light travelling in time along one dimension. So we have two dimensions of light c² times one dimension of light detected as mass hence why E=mc² because m IS light converted into a vortex, travelling in one direction/along one axis. So the twist (QM:spin) and subsequent compaction of the fabric is detected as mass.  While universal time moves forward in one dimension it is, in relativistic terms, 3 dimensional, measured time is deduced to move forwards and backwards in far afield clocks relative to a stationary clock. When we understand the double slit experiment however we realise that time is universal within the quantum realm but it is impossible to detect anything happening outside one measured dimension of time. Anything happening in other dimensions are moving away from us faster than the speed of light and can never be detected only deduced. Even neutrinos which I predict will be detected moving outwards as ripples from streams of electrons will be detected at different angles from the electron path but in the same dimension of relativistic time. Within each quantised tick, one Planck unit of time any hypothetical imaginary clock placed within a RIK, a dark matter particle oscillates through 3 main and 10 minor dimensions of influence, In principle it is similar to the fact a vehicle moving at high speed such as a car, aeroplane, rocket etc moves forward along one general dimension of space but has deviations in 3 dimensions and the engine that drives it forward is always moving inside in 3 dimensions. The energy propagates out in 3 dimensional relativistic time and the waves of energy are detectable moving through the field particles which oscillate as they are passed, similar in a sense to how buoys on water oscillate as waves pass. This wave of oscillations moving through the RIKs combined with the limitations of detection means we can only observe one part of the wave moving forward through the particles in the field (which become visible when they move) along one axis of time and one of space giving the illusion that it is a single particle moving forward in space and time. Similar to the illusion caused by lighting bulbs in sequence say on a billboard video screen depicting and appearing to the observer as a moving object say a football, where in reality it is a series of electrical signals lighting up diodes to emit light, the resulting series of illuminations moving forward in a straight line across the screen generating the illusion that it is a ball. (Note for anyone who thinks this in some way means we are in a matrix in the classical scifi sense, this is not the case. It is a matrix of sorts but it is not a simulation neither can anyone come in or out randomly by plugging into the system, birth and death are seemingly the only way in and out. Other forces may have influence in dreams, voices and visions but the primary control ultimately comes from the soul that entered the lattice at conception.) 

The wobble, twist (QM:spin) causes the compaction (mass) which creates a stretch in the surrounding fabric in 3 dimensions which is directly proportional to the distance a torlectron has to travel through the RIKs and the connecting TREDDs. So it is directly proportional to time dilation so time must also be affected by 3 dimensions inside the dark matter particle which is reflective of the movement of the vortex through the ether/flazzma. Time is measured in a unit I will call a tik t which is the time it takes for the torlectron to travel one line of RIKs. So we get the equation for mass using the logic
if E=mc² then
M=(4/3.πc³-energy lost to ripples in the TREDDs (-El for energy lost)/c²)M)ne.nx.Δp.3Δt
Because
x is a field particle "RIK"
r is it's radius
It is logical to deduce that E in E=mc² is not the total energy or energy "the force" it is only the detected kinetic energy of one dimension of space and one of time multiplied by the other energy passing in the other 2 macro dimensions of spacetime. As everything is logically nothing but energy in one form or another mass must be the detected energy only and the total energy inside an electron which is the simplest detection of a torlectron, the building block of all other standard model particles,  it is the detected kinetic energy "mass" but there is also undetected kinetic energy lost as neutrino waves pass out along the connecting TREDDs.  
It is logical to assume then that the detected energy (mass) and deduced energy (neutrino and axion waves) is c³ as it is all the energy generated in three dimensions of space in the one place in the universe where we can confine energy to verify it is moving in 3 dimensions of space, that place being the electron. So c times c² is the total energy so e=c³=π/6Mev and we have 5 ways to express the equation
E here being total E detected in one and deduced in 3 dimensions as opposed to standard E which is only energy detected in one dimension.
E=π/6Mev.nx.Δp.Δt
E=c³
c³=π/6Mev.nx.Δp.Δt.
c³=π/6.10^6ev.nx.Δp.Δt.
In it's simplest form of logic
E=the total amount of energy/pushes generated in 511000 pushes of a specific number of RIKs in one length of one line of RIKs in a tik plus the ripples of kinetic energy sent out as neutrino waves... multiplied by the 2 other macro dimensions of spacetime. 
 
Energy is lost to the neutrino oscillations along the connecting TREDDs. These having 3 different lengths along the 13 strands connected at 26 points on the central Rik in the ratio of 1:1.41:1.73   6@1, 12@1.41, 8@1.73. giving each outward TREDD an oscillation of incredibly tiny mass. These pulling against each other as the wave travels out causing greater oscillations with stretch and phase shifts with 3 different levels of energy at troughs and 3 at peaks merging at field points as low energy neutrinos/axions. The 3 distinct neutrinos detected due to the principle of superposition where these waves interact and create energy peaks greater in strength than their individual energy.
So the overall mass is the amount of energy confined in the RIK 4/3πc³ less  energy lost to the connecting TREDDs, which is 0.511 Mev/c² the mass of one electron which is one position multiplied by the amount of positions nx brought together as a standard model "tparticle" .  nx multipied by the accumulative momentum which is p (every time a wobbling RIK is pushed against another the wobble is multiplied in 3 dimensions of space so it is to the power of three. When they don't collide but spin around a central point the momentum is added.) multiplied by the amount of torlectrons ne by any moments of time dilation by 3 one for each dimension of time 3Δt
M=(4/3.πc³-El Mev/c²).ne.nx.p.3Δt. It is important to remember that momentum is not always a straight forward "one or the other" calculation, sometimes it is the total amount of RIKs and/or FUBs (a FUB is the basic shape formed when RIKs become gathered in groups of 13 RIKs stuck together by an internal looping torlectron, detected as standard model tparticles, explained soon) colliding against each other multiplying momentum as in the Higgs Boson or W and Z bosons. Sometimes it is RIKs/FUBs pulling back and forth opposite each other or spinning around a central point so not all colliding against each other but adding rather than multiplying momentum as in muons and mesons. Sometimes it is a mix of both like in neutrons. 
These pushes of the torlectron inside the RIKs stretches the surrounding field inwards as the RIKs twist and vibrate with the pushes (spin is more accurately described as "twist" explained later) along with the vacuum energy pulling other RIKs closer. This is what is detected as mass. Mass IS the amount of pull inwards of the field caused by torlectrons stuck in loops stretching the fabric of the field. The greater the range of movement the wave has between RIKs, how many times that movement is compounded and the more torlectrons it contains the more it twists, stretches and pulls in the fabric and is therefore detected with greater mass. The total shape and compounded movement giving the mass can be deduced using the equation m=(4/3.πc³-El Mev/c²).nne.nx.p.3Δt To use the classic way to illustrate gravity with a sheet made of stretchable fabric, if we drop one snooker ball in the centre we get a dip representing mass and it's equivalent effect in gravity, with every ball added (every RIK brought into play) there is added dip and stretch.  A better way to illustrate it is actually to have an object say a fork inserted into the fabric and twisted. With every twist the fabric is pulled in more and objects stuck WITHIN the fabric strands are moved to where the distance between strands is the shortest ie the point of least resistance which is nearer to where the twist happens.


 Calculations for almost all "tparticles" in the  standard model using the formula are in the paper in the "EXPLANATION OF MASS" section. 
_____________________________________________
When we look at the equation for mass  we see two interesting numbers seem to pop up but in different powers of ten so a correlation is hinted at. We get 0.5238 which is pi divided by six π/6 Mev/c² as the total energy existing or generated in the RIK at any given time and we also get 12800ev if we view it in decimal we get 12800 or 2^(7) x 10^2. This attracts a comparison with binary which is the numerical system of information. So one electron volt would appear to be one bit of optical  information in binary yet if we postulate that base 10 to the power of 2 is perhaps significant then one electron volt would appear to be one bit of optical  information in binary then if we want to make that correlation to it in binary having two states a push and it's opposite simultaneous pull we divide it by 2 and 12800 becomes 25600 or 2^(8) x 10²).  So we can likely say a binary electron volt is one bit of  optical information, 1 binary electron volt 1bev/c². 1bev/c² passing through it. One binary electron volt 1bev/c² = (1ev/2)/c²  If we use this system we get the total energy moving or generated in a RIK in half a  tik as 
1047600 bev/c² x 10²
If we stay with the standard system of figures we get 0.5238Mev/c² or 
 π/6Mev/c²
as the total energy confined within one RIK if none were lost as weak neutrino or axion  waves.
.

I will give an example using the Higgs Boson which is different than normal matter in the sense that whereas normal matter as we know it which is relatively stable is usually created in nature by a single torlectron looping inside the RIKs, others like the heavier quarks are engineered in high energy accelerators by forcing in more vortices of energy. The Higgs Boson needs 3 torlectrons to enter loops simultaneously or almost immediately one after the other to hold shape hence it has only ever been detected in high energy particle accelerators. What happens is this. The force of one torlectron entering at a specific angle and wavelength loops and creates negative energy in its wake (similar to a pulling undercurrent in ocean waves) which draws in all 13 RIKs into the FUB shape which wobbles, detected as mass and that wobble/mass accumulates as each subsequent torlectron hits almost instantaneously one after another or simultaneously with each other. So each of the 3 torlectrons entering causes a mass of 13³ 2​,197  which gives a total mass of 6591 times that of a single RIK's wobble ie. An electron. However there are also moments where each wave arrives travelling from the core of the FUB to hit a RIK head on stretching it away from the group so we have the mass of an electron moving away from the momentarily stable FUB. Meantime there are also 2 torlectrons travelling with the FUB structure with their momentum each adding to the momentum by 1/3 the force of a discrete electron not the full electron mass as the RIKs are now touching and the torlectrons are moving in the FUB except not directly opposite the stretched and extended RIK because their overall directions are away from the Higgs centre (giving the brim of the "Mexican hat") which when both are compounded is 1/3². So we have 13³ x 3 x ((12 x 3) + 1 + 1/3²)= 6591 x (36+1+.111)=6591 x 37.111 = 244599 times the mass of a single electron going by the standard model [5] where an electron is 0.511 Mev/c² and a Higgs Boson is 124.97Gev/c². This is soon hit by a 4th wave of energy disrupting the loops allowing all 3 torlectrons to escape, the shape collapses completely and the other 3 torlectrons escape in an instant. 
As we can see from the example the energy of the 3 torlectrons would be expected to become distributed between all the RIKs following classical mechanics. But this doesn't happen, as more energy passes more RIKs that energy is multiplied forward creating a quarter of a million times more energy than a single electron in a very short period of time using only 3 torlectrons.

 If energy could not be created then as this energy passes out from the RIK it should become dispersed so the mass of a single RIK should decrease as more RIKs are brought into the standard model particle shape. But this doesn't happen. The mass increases in multiples of the number of RIKs brought into play multiplied and/or compounded by the momentum. So energy must be created. It is propagated in a forward direction of space and time each time a RIK is excited. If the RIK already has mass when a wave of energy hits it the energy is multiplied. 
I will put this in all capitals again as it is a very important point. 
IF ENERGY COULD NOT BE CREATED THEN AS THIS ENERGY PASSES OUT FROM THE RIK IT SHOULD BECOME DISPERSED SO THE MASS OF A SINGLE RIK SHOULD DECREASE AS MORE RIKS ARE BROUGHT INTO THE STANDARD MODEL PARTICLE SHAPE. BUT THIS DOESN'T HAPPEN. THE MASS INCREASES IN MULTIPLES OF THE NUMBER OF RIKS BROUGHT INTO PLAY MULTIPLIED AND OR COMPOUNDED BY THE MOMENTUM. SO ENERGY MUST BE CREATED

I had initially thought that perhaps the energy was dissipated relative to their speed. In which case the speed limit of these manifolds would decrease the heavier they are but this is not the case. The fact is that we can acellerate protons to over 99% the speed of light. The relativistic mass that increases in proportion to the energy input during this acceleration is the compaction of the fabric at the forward end of the accelerating manifold. 
This is effectively what has been postulated as the magnetic monopole. The RIK, the field particle which my breakdown of the field and the mathematics of the electron and it's relationship to all other standard model tparticles shows that energy is created in 3 dimensions of time and 3 dimensions of space.

So while energy can not be created or destroyed in one dimensional time once we get to the quantum level and understand the workings of the "engine" of the universe by confining energy within one RIK and analysing it as a torlectron we find time like space is three dimensional. The mathematics of mass show that with three dimensions of space and three of time energy is created at the rate of π/6Mev/c² in each RIK passed and where that momentum returns within a loop between RIKs the total momentum is the sum and/or multiples of the two colliding momentums. This is also affected by slight variations in time where the TREDDs become momentarily stretched as energy hits at angles which force RIKs to be pushed away from the central body of the standard model tparticle and time dilates further increasing the mass in multiples of 3 (dimensions of time) by the total mass of the object in that moment of stretch. So mass detected plus the mass lost to neutrino waves along the TREDDs give us a total energy of 0.511mev/c² +el


Because time is not truly linear it is variable in 3 dimensions when we look at the equation for mass we must factor in moments of time dilation in factors of three for each moment of dilated time (dt) one for each dimension of time  so E  must be π/6Mev/c².ne.nx.Δp.3Δt in an electron the total energy is the mass plus the energy created (but then lost) to neutrino waves, there is the number of torlectrons ne, one position RIK, one unit of momentum  and as there is no time dilation so 3Δt becomes redundant and the number remains the same. While there is no value for 3Δt there already is time in 3 dimensions in the single RIK.
So in one time dimension
E=c³.ne.nx.Δp.3Δt


E=π/6Mev/c².ne.nx.Δp.3Δt
 because the 3 dimensions of time are only experienced in moments of time dilation so it is a multiple of three not the power of three. In 3 dimensions of time then this would be.
E=(π/6Mev/c².nx.Δp.ne.3Δt)³
The rest of the energy moves out in all directions usually undetected in one dimensional time measurement, when we try to detect it using the which way method in the double slit experiment it becomes confined to a path of one dimension of time and one of space within the defined area of focus. However the extra created energy is revealed by the interference pattern left on the back screen when we don't try to focus on one dimension of time. We see marks which show that energy spreads out in all directions but our range of focus on time and space covers a wider space and range of time so the paths detected are more dispersed.
While we can't physically measure the total energy in one dimension of time  we already see that the mathematics of mass shows energy is not dispersed but created so time logically is three dimensional and we can further verify that time is multidimensional at the quantum level using the 3 simple ways of running the experiments and analysing them as I describe in the double slit experiment page. Then we can logically accept that the value is real. Even if we can't measure it with technology the interference pattern already shows the evidence. Energy is created in 3 dimensions of space and 3 of time but it can only be detected travelling through one dimension of space and one of time where it cannot be created or destroyed. While we experience energy in 3 dimensions of space and time we can only measure it in space between 2 points along one dimension/direction and put these all together in time between points/moments along one dimension/duration. While we measure 3 dimensions of space and 3 of time in the mass of a single electron it is detected as moments of inward outward linear impacts similar to a ball tied to a paddle by elastic and each rebound is an impact these all added together make up the total mass wobbling back and forth in between sets of two points in a tik³. So even here both space and time are measured along one dimension and the sum total is the total energy detected. We always knew there were three dimensions of space we just didn't realise there were 3 different dimensions of time....until now. So if there was a period when the Universe/field was still and without energy or all the energy was contained in one RIK perhaps  all it took was just over one tick of time in one RIK and the Universe/field began multiplying, expanding  and growing exponentially. 
. 
While matter takes up only a tiny percentage of the total volume of space in the universe mass is the total amount of the compaction of the fabric due to the twist inwards. Theoretically the mismatch in the ratio of mass to optical  information in the electron and the universe is perhaps representative of the total mass possible given time. When the universe itself reaches that amount of compaction all the matter will perhaps impact on itself, explode or pulsate outwards releasing all the trapped light again.  At first glance this could seem to account for "inflation" but in fact that too, like the expanding universe model, would be too fast of a jump to a conclusion which doesn't actually seem to bear up to the dynamics of the field when one looks further.  The spherical Universe is logically the only shape the universe is, while the flat and saddle shaped universes are hypothesised in mathematical models they hold no place in common sense/logic, these have too may open ends and don't hold up to known logic. All systems within the universe from RIKS to planets to black bodies are all spherical, logic tells us the universe is the same and STT further backs this up later in the paper. 
These subset of notes and equations CC copyrighted and added 11.17am central European time April 27 2020
". 
-------------------------------------------------------- 
The Planck numbers appear when we analyse the electron for the dynamics.  pi which is representative of the predominant defining shape in the universe the figure six  to embody 2 energies and three inseparable/interwoven dimensions of spacetime or one energy and two entities each having 3 dimensions, time and space, then of 10³  with a sub number pointing to binary are all there is a huge finding.
As most physicists and mathematicians probably know base 10 is not only a great base for calculations it is also the base of one of the strongest uniform shape in nature after the sphere. Base 4 being another then base 10 and base 5 being the smallest unit representing the 6 sided diamond shape with 3 layers of spheres touching in the ratio of 1:3:1. Base 4 and 10 the first and second bases of the 3 and 4 sided triangular pyramids. 5 being the base of the basic 6 sided diamond shape all 3 bases having all spheres touching all connecting spheres. Base 4 having 3 spheres on each side with all near surfaces touching  (like the tau), base 10 having 6 spheres on each side, all touching, with 2 layers of 1 sphere on top of 3 spheres when viewed from any of the 4 corners in base 4 and 3 layers of spheres with 1, 3 and 6 spheres sitting on top of one another when viewed from any of the 4 corners in base 10. The outer layer of the spacetime fabric or the skin must be phenomenally strong (having properties perhaps related to base 4, 5 or 10) and at the same time flexible, base 5 and base 10 are all in the equation for e. Initially I am thinking, logically the skin of the spacetime fabric RIKs and TREDDs likely has a structure similar to the 27 point universal structure of the field with field particles and connecting strands. We can make base 4, base 5 and base 10 within the 27 point field structure.  These shapes perhaps explaining other phenomenon happening in nature like quantum level viruses and visions not normally seen by humans. For example "Angels": souls holding information based bodies rather than standard matter together, auras even perhaps extra terrestrial alien lifeforms broadcasting images (physical 26D images) through space and time outside our "visual spectrum"'. Angels as in souls holding bodies made of crystalline structures rather than curved "matter". Curved matter having molecules which would be much, much larger than crystalline molecules due to the fact they have time dilation and would create much more detectable disturbances in the field, also having different dynamics in any loop through 13 dimensions of quantised time would be much easier to see/detect than crystalline bodies.   Historically experienced and witnessesed/documented by prophets, visionaries, shamen, witches and gurus. These people are Theoretically or in effect therefore highly "tuned in",  sensitive, disciplined, honest metaphysical scientists.  NOTE: if any mathematician is keeping a keen eye and wants to help me out even at this late stage, please do, remember the scientific process is "prove the theory wrong" I have already proven the SMOPP wrong, until proven otherwise mine is now the correct one. if anyone comes up with other definitive numbers backed by clear logic using my framework please, please continue working and developing the theory, always with reference to the original. for anyone who performs the experiment variations on the double slit experiment please email me using the term dsevresults, I live in the hope I might finally get a good nights sleep and we can then get onto the really exciting stuff...the implications. NOTE added 00:12 14th May 2020 central European time. 

While physicists perhaps believe they measure in 3 dimensions of space and one of time in reality they don't. They always measure between 2 points in one dimension of space and one of time then quantify this further between this value and another point...and on it goes, always in one dimension of space and one of time. However because they know space is 3 dimensional they deduce the final quantities using the numbers that are found between two points and correlate all measurements of these into 3 dimensions of space and one of time using a logical awareness hence why energy cannot seem be created or destroyed in one dimension of time. The fact that the double slit experiment shows that time is multidimensional at the quantum level and the fact that c² is two dimensions of space and time means c³ must be 3 dimensions of space and 3 of time and that energy is created in this paradigm. All we need to do is to use the same logic used with an awareness of 3 dimensional space and apply it to 3 dimensions of time. It's not hard to do once we can get our heads around it, like it wasn't hard for mankind to understand the world is round and revolves around the sun once everyone stopped to think about it and looked at the evidence. The world then experienced exponential growth in almost every area, education, health, science, technology etc. It seems it is time to once again move into a new era of exponential growth in consciousness with the new realisation that time is multidimensional at the quantum level.
_____________________________
So once we understand that energy is vibrations transferring the force we realise the statement "energy cannot be created or destroyed" is untrue, energy must be created. Ripples or waves must be created. Perhaps they cannot be destroyed once created and perhaps we have failed to quantify the energy created by the force of creation which we use in music, art, stories, romance but whatever limitations we have in measuring it the logic seems indisputable. Something creates waves/ripples, a force acting on a medium. _So even though we have a mathematical model that shows energy is created in 3D time it still doesn't answer the deepest question. What is the force? Energy is still a manifestation of the movement created by the force it is not the force itself. Spring Time Theory shows that there is consciousness and the double slit experiment demonstrates the Universe is conscious. So in order to answer the question what is the force we must look deeper into the logic outside the quantifiable. We must go where mathematics and physical science can't. We go to the philosophy/science of metaphysics.

THE PHILOSOPHICAL/METAPHYSICAL MODEL.
The the source of the force of course is consciousness but it is not a singular consciousness for the force to become manifest it needs a duality. We push against the field and we create energy that ripples through spacetime. Energy quantised is a push but it isn't purely energy that has always been in the Universe as some hypothesise. To read this the reader would have to push a button on a computer, exert a force on the field. It is not simply a case of using energy that is already in the field and converting it. Any physical movement of our bodies necessitates the force of consciousness, to walk we must push electric signals out to muscles, we push against gravity to jump, we push against water to swim etc. We generate that force and in doing so manipulate energy that is already moving in the field. I say that the force is even greater than consciousness that it is love, the will to be together and experience other souls in a physical realm that causes us to push against the field (which seems indisputable to me, without the will to be with others I find no will to push, to live, to experience life with other souls) 

As for the origin, it is beyond me where the original physical body came from but Gregori Perelman's solution to the Poincare conjecture provides the logic for the beginning of the expansion of the  universe, how that initial body grew and expanded. That the original form was soft, extremely flexible, also extremely strong, so one would tend to assign it as having qualities of a female which grows and expands in pulses, like everything living in nature that exists within it, repeating pushes, pulses. 
To deny the existence of the soul seems ridiculous to me. It is so obvious and clear that it seems to me to try and deny it is like trying to deny one is breathing or moving in any way. Even the most primal movement, the movement of an eye, to change the position of the view or adjust the focus requires that we, who are souls within a physical, biological machine that we call a body exert energy, pushes to create movement. 



 Any notion of the start of time, of a beginning to consciousness or the creation of the original body seems beyond human comprehension, it is certainly beyond the scope of any human that I have ever met and it seems to me to be quite  superficial, shallow sometimes even dishonest for any human to try and give an explanation for the beginning of time or how the initial physical body came to be, it seems that is in the realm of Gods.


Realising that energy is only a measurement of the amount of movement created by the force I realised we must delve deeper to understand this force. In the physical realm it is light but even still light is not the force, light is a manifestation of the force. Being already aware that the universe has consciousness like we all do, everyone reading or listening to this has consciousness. So I must try to imagine what it must be like for the universe to experience consciousness. If it were a single entity a singular force originating from a singularity what might it be? Initially I can find none, a singularity makes no sense, everything in nature has duality, light/dark, hot/cold, male/female, life death etc. So there must be a duality. So whatever the force is it must come from a duality. We see that the RIKs and TREDDs have a duality, the only singularity seems to be consciousness. The source of consciousness, the soul, "I" seems to be eternal and ageless. visionaries perhaps had communication from the universe, visions that held clues to help advancement, perhaps like modern day big bang/expanding universe physicists and like even the best language interpreters often do they simply misinterpreted some of the data at times. Like all interpreters or scientists their interpretation of data is limited by their beliefs and world knowledge reference frame.  
Then as I tried to imagine how the universe might experience consciousness. I remembered sleep paralysis. As a child and sometimes though rarely as an adult I experienced sleep paralysis. I would wake up, be aware but unable to move my body. I sometimes thought I was dead, I could sense no pulse or heart beat, perhaps I was "clinically dead"'. So perhaps this is how consciousness feels in isolation and the universe is no different, it craves connection. When in this state I felt no pain. So objectively there should be no reason to find it uncomfortable or frightening but it was. Extremely, intensely frightening and I thought why? It wasn't a fear of death as such I had no negative view of death, death can be a tempting release from the pain of life when it becomes overwhelming. I realised it was something else it was separation from love, separation from those who loved me and who I loved. So while consciousness is the awareness of the I love is the force. It is love which motivates connection. It is love which gives everything meaning even death. If there were no such force as love we wouldn't miss our loved ones we wouldn't grieve. It is a disconnect from love. I realised love is the driving force behind everything even when it seems not to be.  This force to love and be loved to stay connected, motivated me to move, with concentrated focus or willpower I eventually focused on that force of love and first a finger moved then another then eventually I was able to sit up in the bed. Willpower is an expression of focus over time to move but the force that creates that movement is love. It is the force of love that causes the push and pull that creates waves in the flazzma. The push of the want to be connected to others the pull perhaps back to the source of the force I. This constant push pull sending ripples through every place and every living soul in the universe, the universe itself a sum of all the souls in it like our bodies are the sum of all the cells within us. 


Truth seems to be inextricably linked to love. We love things that make us feel connected. When we are sure of something there is comfort, we feel more love. It is every bit as logical to accept that the universe feels the same, it wants to feel love. Love is what gives meaning to everything. Without it life itself is meaningless even unbearable. It is the force that creates and sustains life. Time is also linked to love with an inverse relationship. If with a sweetheart or at a party or on holiday a day, week or more can seem to go by super fast. Yet if we are separated from a loved one and we can't get them on the phone a minute can seem like an hour. Time dilates. It is an effect of different dimensions outside the physical but it creates movement in the physical also. 
 Ultimately only one thing holds us from understanding and grasping the power of love and its pervasiveness in the universe, that is doubt. It is however the easiest thing in the world to create doubt, doubt needs no rigid verified science it can create confusion and disempower us using pseudoscience, bad science or even simply lies.   It is love (synonymous with truth) that creates all molecules, everything in nature, physical and biological. It is in love that truth exists and truth is revealed by love and vice versa.
If this still does not convince anyone that love is the force I would then ask them the question. If love is not the force what is? To anyone who says that love is not a physical force I would say it most definitely is you obviously just don't recognise it. I feel it in the form of intense but subtle tiny vibrations (many pop songs express a similar association with love and vibrations (https://youtu.be/apBWI6xrbLY  https://youtu.be/apBWI6xrbLY  https://youtu.be/ws6zCW6zXAM) Think about it, it is difficult to imagine many adults who have not had experiences like heart palpitations, nervous shakes or the inability to speak when overwhelmed by the effort of trying to contain the vibrations of excitement one feels when another arouses the force of love within us. It is VERY much a physical force.  When one meditates or engages in other mind expanding practices one can feel that vibration come from plants also. A response to vibration perhaps so unused in those who rely very much on sight, explaining perhaps why Stevie Wonder's masterpiece The Secret Life of Plants seems to capture that force so beautifully [85] https://youtu.be/9J3_psP5oe0
When we love someone we take action to increase our connection, in the physical realm and  in consciousness, to make their presence in our reality more permanent and real. So acts of love are actions which create movements/ripples which increase the loved ones permanence in our reality. 

Our perception of how loving a person is, is based on subjective views of how far that persons actions go to connect people, whether that "love field" extends only to oneself, those nearest or the entire world? It is very often in the context of love,  where the old saying "actions speak louder than words" becomes most evident.
Perhaps the greatest form of love is risking separation separation from everyone one longs to be with in order to bring them closer to each other. The ultimate love is when one is prepared and actively faces death to keep others alive. While one may become disconnected in the physical realm through death when practicing such love the connection is made in consciousness. So the spirit who gives up his or her own life to keep other spirits alive in the realm of life always remains connected and is drawn back by the conscious focus of the living beings to be reincarnated again amongst those they love.Like the youths in Tiananmen square who faced almost certain death to show how powerful the sense of love was within them in order to bring the consciousness of a society back to the idea of love. A society which they perhaps saw was losing or had lost that sense of love/togetherness. Like many great liberators who faced losing friends, family, fortunes, popularly even their life to bring others closer together. Every willing soldier in WWll who gave up his/her life to bring others together (Nazi and other fascist soldiers included who's racism and bigotry was fuelled when they saw their nations ripped apart and impoverished by outside powers). Self sacrifice perhaps epitomised by the figure of the burning monk Thích Quảng Đức in Vietnam who gave up this life to protest against evil, to demonstrate the power of chi/qi (which Jesus clearly used in healing) to overcome pain, his faith in reincarnation, non violence and hope immortalised in this breathtaking act of faith, discipline and teaching. To bring those around him and who would see him back to the truth and togetherness. 

(Note I do not claim to know everything about love, I have much to learn about love, I feel it but I struggle every day to understand it and to live up to the standards of kindness and giving of myself to others that I think I should. I am merely talking about the primal force driving creation which causes the movement.) 


OVERVIEW OF THE STANDARD MODEL OF PARTICLE PHYSICS.
 A short video using pictures to give a very short visual guide to the general mechanics of the standard model particles is available here. https://vimeo.com/439465079
The first thing to address in the standard model [4] is that it is the flazzma [3] moving through the field [9] in waves detected at points and termed photons that is the elementary force carrier that directly creates ALL others in the model as internal looping waves, apart from neutrinos/axions which are also  created indirectly due to ripples.  In reality all massive particles in the standard model of particle physics (except the neutrinos) are not separate particles as such. They are each a collection of RIKs acting as  electrons/positrons clumped together by a vacuum type effect created by the negative energy of waves as vortices(torlectrons) moving internally in the field particles "RIKs" pulling them together. Each atom has a specific number of torlectrons and positrons and they are bound in different ways leading to different shapes, momentum, stability, charge, spin etc. In the case of the gluon it is a single RIK acting as a bridge allowing a wave to move between groups of bound torlectrons. In the visual representation of the model we usually see the Higgs boson outside the blocks  on its own or in the centre of a circle. This makes sense because even though it is detected as having a Mexican hat shape this is only the shape it appears after full momentum and time dilation, its basic shape before   stretch/time dilation  into the hat shape is one RIK surrounded by 12 others (explained later in the paper). The photon is the energy wave below a certain energy and/or hitting bends at critical angles as they pass through the field wich causes no jolt/twist/mass detected at locations as a single unit. In reality it is only ever one point in a 3 dimensional wave. As waves of energy pass through the RIKs in the field above a certain energy they hit bends causing the RIKs to wobble/vibrate creating what we detect as mass. The vortices of energy move through the internal paths and where the angle changes they can get stuck in internal loops. The momentum and path for these vortices of energy and the negative energy they create in their wake can lead to these loops pulling connecting RIKs together and becoming stuck to a point in another's surface as a torlectron is transferred from one RIK to another.  Essentially protons and neutrons are similar to covalent bonding at the quantum particle level in the sense that they are held together by sharing torlectrons which loop between them. I will address covalent bonding at the quark and orbital level soon. 

I will first address the Higgs Boson and why it's shape is fundamental. Its shape before  stretch/time dilation  is twelve RIKs pulled in tight around one central RIK like the shape made famous by the kissing ball debate between Newton and Gregor[10] All other tparticles are formed from this basic shape which I will call a Fundamental Unifying Block or FUB for short. Each RIK in the field is connected to 26 others at every point in the field 7 RIKs touching surfaces by their connecting springs “TREDDs” being wound in tight, the other 20 connected by stretched TREDDs. When vortices  of energy are diverted by differing angles they rebound off bends within the RIKs and the subsequent wobble draws that RIK closer to touch another, passing the vortice along. This happening so fast that in an instant the wave has created negative energy in its wake and drawn a number of RIKs together in groups or clumps. In the basic shape of a FUB there is one central RIK and 12 others are brought in and compacted to touch the central RIK's surface. The shape of the FUB is inherently unstable and it decays rapidly or breaks it's loops rapidly.  However what happens with quarks is that where the angle of connecting RIKs in the field matches a loop  the wave is once again caught in that loop. Again at critical angles and because the shape is inherently unstable it passes to form another FUB  then another, then back to the first. So the wave becomes stuck in a loop between 3 FUBs, each known as a quark and as 3 grouped collectively known as a neutron or proton. The gluon is the RIK through which the wave passes from one quark to another as it does this the RIK is separated from the FUB as it's connecting TREDDs are stretched, thereby detected and known as a gluon. As this momentum leads to a spinning motion (imagine children holding hands spinning in a circle) the other 11 RIKs around the central one are forced out and squeezed together in groups of 12 by the outward momentum, known collectively as a quark so the looping path between all three quarks or "conjoined" FUBs becomes extremely strong as the loops are vey tight making it difficult for  more energy  to enter or to escape making a neutron temporarily strong and the proton permanently extremely strong (in nature eternal unless subjected to immense energy). The mass of the quarks are logically dictated by the wavelength of the energy and the amount of torlectrons forced in. When these loops are broken in the chain reaction of nuclear power [11] it is the release of massive amounts of this contained looping vortice of energy from a compacted area  due to the wave of energy pushing the quarks stretching the spacetime fabric which breaks the path of the torlectron's loop leading to immense amounts of torlectrons colliding which causes the explosion or generation of nuclear energy. (Explained further in the next section after the overview of the standard model, NUCLEAR ENERGY)(It is worth noting that the understanding that protons and neutrons create photons of extremely low energy (explained in the section on 137) means that the whole idea about stars energy being as a result of nuclear collisions needs to be looked at afresh. It seems that stars generate virtually unlimited energy by protons spinning in loops and the resulting waves growing in magnitude. The logic suggests they are, so everything we know about the age, evolution, lifecycles of stars needs to be thought out again with the correct model. They are self perpetuating dynamos of unlimited endless energy.)
The Electron is one detected torlectron passing through a single RIK detected by the effect the movement the passing torlectron has on the RIK detected as an independent single tparticle due to the limitations of observation in 3 dimensional time. 
 
Covalent bonding itself [12] is where electron orbitals meet, touch and share torlectrons along shared loops.
Electron orbitals are where torlectrons are stuck in looping paths caused by the neutrons and protons pulling inwards, stretching the surrounding fabric and causing straight paths to become curved at specific angles eventually creating loops. When these are stretched in gravitational zones it does 2 things first it stretches the loop path angle slightly which changes the wavelength of the energy (Isaac Newton's work with light through prisms [13] showing that wavelength can be changed by path change not necessarily only by linear outward/inward expansion of the Doppler effect [14]) and secondly it means the radius from the nucleus to the electron orbital is stretched so it takes longer for that wave to complete a loop around the atom leading to time dilation [15] (in 3 dimensions, mathematical formula given later in the paper). Covalent bonding of elements into molecules is where torlectrons get stuck in looping paths which are formed in this manner as the space-time fabric is pulled into clumps and the path through the fabric is changed from straight to curved. These electron orbitals then clash and merge with other electron orbitals and the waves' energy are shared between two or more atoms. Electric current [16] is where we can move flazzma as waves of energy through these joined orbital paths, where one wave is forced in another is forced out. Where there is no other outlet the orbital becomes closed or "inert". The detectable mass is the amount of disturbance/wobble caused by the internal looping wave´s energy. To visualise this imagine a roller coaster where the rail/tracks are suspended by strong elastic. As the roller coaster hits a bend the whole rail moves stretching with the momentum. As these waves are travelling at the speed of light the stretch and subsequent "wobble" (mass) is phenomenal. As quarks this is happening at trillions of times a second as the waves complete loop after loop stuck between 3 FUBs bound via 3 exchange channels of RIKs acting as gluons.
Neutrinos/axions are  often the tiny vibrations or mass detected in RIKs as tiny ripples in the connecting TREDDs pass causing the RIKs to vibrate very slightly what I will call "neutrino waves". Essentially neutrino waves are ripples similar to gravitational waves [17] but on a very small scale. Gravitational waves are caused by massive wobble in super massive objects like supernova leading to vibrations rippling through the field like we see in spiders webs. The waves which are detected as relatively high energy neutrinos as they pass RIKs are the tiny ripples in the field caused by torlectrons passing through it, these cause vibrations within RIKs which cause the connecting RIKs to bang off each other. The vibration from these collisions ripple out from the source, torlectrons, where RIKs knock against each other and cause the connecting strands to ripple). As they pass RIKs they shake them and cause that tiny vibration and mass. The three types of relatively high energy neutrinos are due to either the level of energy sent out from the impact or/and these vibrations going in and out of phase [18] or as a result of the quantum mechanical principle of superposition where different waves merge into new peaks. Of course there are many other types of such minor ripples mainly from protons and neutrons  which correspond to the theorised  axions. Neutrinos are the only ones known about so far to affect RIKs due to their relativity extremely strong waves originating from electron leptons. Where they hit the large bosons W & Z they knock the energy out from its loop which enters the field again as the electron family. Whichever electron, muon or tau it decays into depends also on the geometry of the location, the amount of kinetic energy passing or/and which phase of oscillation the ripple was in when it hit the boson. Neutrinos, Muon neutrinos and tau neutrinos are the ripples of kinetic energy spreading out through the field due to the disturbance of the electron, muon and tau passing through the fabric. Detected at a discrete point in time and space as they pass along shaking the RIKs. 
It appears there is a completely different system of information transfer with thought. If consciousness has a physical component we could be transferring physical information, the evidence shows non physical or conscious information travels instantly, that means that theoretically we can already communicate with other conscious beings in other parts of space and time if we can tune into their conscious frequencies aand this is not just fairytale physics, I have devised experiments to test the theory. 
https://youtu.be/NXD3tWcy6VA
https://youtu.be/H-JF3lniRH4

THE HYDROGEN ATOM AND THE MEASUREMENT PROBLEM. Added 31 July 2021
The simplest of all atoms the single electron hydrogen atom does not in fact only have one electron in it's electron orbital. Only one can be detected due to the measurement problem because we can only ever measure in one dimension of space and time. However as is revealed by the deconstruction of the dynamics at play in the Riemann Hypothesis which I began tackling in spring 2021 and explain in a separate summary on another private page on the website there are in fact 12 electrons created and held in the electron orbital at the fine structure constant in the basic Hydrogen atom. It overturns a previous claim I had that the charge of the proton and electron are the same strength but opposite charge. This also a realisation from the Riemann Hypothesis which made me understand this is not true, it is only the detectable charge that is equal in power and opposite in that orientation of space and time. The torlectron stuck inside the manifold loop that constitutes the proton travels between all parts of the loop. Travelling and moving between RIKs at 1/137 the speed of light in a space the size of 13 spheres each being one Plank length all pulled into a bunch is mind boggling but it is this which creates the immense mass which is the compaction of the spacetime fabric due to pulling in so much fabric. Inside the proton manifold there is only one torlectron yet its strength is equal to the sum of all the others 137 times further out from its core. Not just the detectable one at the fine structure constant but in fact 137+16x12 other torlectrons moving so fast that they cannot be detected with measurement except as the faint finer lines which we see parallel to the fine structure constant lines. The magnitude of the waves created by the torlectron looping in the field manifold detected as a proton give the equal opposite charge to the sum of all the other torlectrons but the range of measurement means it's charge (wave ebb or swell) is always detected as equal but opposite to one other electron. 
 
 
Quantum Chromodynamics [19] is due to oscillation and resonance, where there is one or many waves passing through and varying intensity of the "colour" dictated by which quark the wave is passing through. The one which it is passing through showing the greatest oscillation and brightest "colour", the other two showing incremental decreased resonance after being passed until the wave re-enters and it assumes the strongest oscillation and "colour" again. These constantly changing in sequence between the three.

 

This essential difference is vital in understanding everything else that happens in the field. Energy waves are what passes THROUGH the field causing the RIKs in the field to oscillate, twist, clump together ( and subsequently all matter), stretch (time dilation and gravity). Energy passing on the outside ALONG the RIKs and TREDDs as ripples give us things like neutrinos and gravitational waves. To visualise the difference consider a flexible water pipe has a sound vibration passing through the water inside and someone shakes the pipe up and down sending 2 different waves along the one pipe.   The reason photons pass each other while electrons annihilate each other is firstly because photons are waves passing straight through the field. Firstly the time difference is so minuscule between moments at the quantum level and secondly because the wavelength will never be exactly equal in energy means their waves cannot clash, they will pass by. Electrons however on the other hand are waves that are in vortices torlectrons so when two vortices meet head on they are travelling towards each other twisting the fabric in opposite directions so when they meet each other the two vortices spinning in opposite direction nullify the pressure and the strands of the spacetime fabric which were being twisted cancel each other out and both vortexes wane because as each comes in clockwise the twist will be opposite and when they meet the momentum cancels and the twisting ceases sending the energy from the extremely pressurised vortices out as high energy photons. Like if two people are standing so each is at either end of a rope and they start swinging the rope for a third person to jump into and start skipping they must one must be swinging clockwise and the other anti clockwise so together they make a wave if both are swinging the rope clockwise the arc of the swinging rope gains no momentum any momentum cancels out at the mid point and no one can jump in to skip. These can be explained using the water waves analogy. We can send streams of water through a hosepipe and at low pressures/energies these will not affect the pipe's external vibration. If however we suddenly increase the pressure above a certain level it sends a jolt or ripple along the exterior of the hosepipe.  It's a similar effect happening when a high energy wave like a torlectron is created in the field. Above a certain energy or/and beyond a critical angle it causes the RIKs to twist giving the wobble/mass and when two of these high energy waves meet they clash and annihilate each other emitting high energy photons like 2 large ocean waves would meet and clash sending out spray at great force. Smaller waves in the ocean seem to simply pass each other by. 


 At the very basic level  electrons are the shape of the movement a passing vortex/torlectron above a certain energy causes to a single RIK, i.e. the path of a twisted wave around a single RIK and the force of it's movement as it spirals along the spring type path within the TREDDs causing the RIK itself to turn due to the momentum of the high energy. This we perceive as an electron, it is in fact a measure of the amount of twist experienced by a RIK due to the momentum of the passing torlectron. As the vortex passes it causes this twist which in turn causes some of the TREDDs to get stretched and the connected RIKs twisted in the opposite direction like cogs in a sequence these giving us "opposite helicity" [20] this leading to an increase in time and mass which are directly relational in 3 dimensions (explained later in the paper). So when we talk of spin in particle physics it is probably more appropriate/accurate to use the term twist, 1/2 twist left or right rather than 1/2 spin up or down,  depending also if it is matter or it's equal opposite helicity and therefore which direction the internal wave is travelling. 

The strands TREDDs are highly flexible tubes which are compacted by twist, attached at every location to 2 RIKs. As mass and time are increased  these are eventually pulled out straight (when there is more pull they seem to stretch further like elastic). Waves of energy still pass at the constant speed of light detected as photons because even though the TREDDs are stretched and their core diameter decreases the waves would still travel through at the same speed except with less energy.
 

NUCLEAR ENERGY
What is actually happening in nuclear fission is that an initial addition of high energy pushes the protons and neutrons very suddenly and violently so the path of the internal torlectron through the spacetime lattice is changed slightly for long enough that it is no longer in a loop, it is released from it's loop and travels out, spreading out in all directions. This wave of energy spreads out knocks any neighbouring protons and neutrons with similar force which do the same, breaking their loop releases the torlectron trapped inside. So within one atom of radioactive materials which have a high number of protons and neutrons we have multiple torlectrons released in an instant. This is an incredibly powerful amount of concentrated energy which spreads out and this vortex of phenomenally high energy hits the protons and neutrons in neighbouring atoms pushing them out of their loop, their trapped torlectrons are released and the chain reaction continues. The light is released from its loops and the chain reaction continues even beyond the radioactive material because the protons and neutrons of all elements are knocked out of their loops also releasing phenomenal amounts of energy. Only when the amount of energy released from an atom is smaller than the amount of energy needed to break a nuclear bond/loop does the chain reaction stop. 


WHY TIME IS multidimensional at the quantum level 
Multi dimensional time is quite simple, it is a logical property of Einstein's time dilation in Special Relativity.

I have many ways to illustrate the Theory but it is incredibly difficult to illustrate time in a physical form, perhaps the simplest although still abstract is this... Consider 3 dimensional time like this if we have matter represented by a ball floating on water being moved forward by waves say along an ocean current.  When it is hit by an oncoming wave it will be moved slightly faster forward until it reaches the wave crest at which time it seems to slow down and almost stop relative to the wave. Then although it is still moving forward it momentarily appears to move backwards relative to the crest as the crest passes and it drops back down towards the trough. Other waves hit from all directions causing it to wobble sideways also. At every moment it is moving forwards overall but with variations in 3 dimensions. When we try to view it there are times when it is visible on or near a crest and times when it dips out of view in a trough. So the probability of focusing on a single tparticle within a multitude of field particles RIKs (in superpositions) is not just dependent on focus in space where the energy is, it is also dependent on time whether that tparticle will be detected at all and at which part of the twist (spin) it will be detected in. While time is universal, varying within a certain range, at every RIK each RIK is acting as it's own harmonic oscillator kept in perfect equilibrium throughout the universe. In it's own location the oscillation can vary greatly due to waves of energy and matter passing. These stretch the connections causing time dilation when they arrive and push the RIKs which then recoil and twist back causing time contraction. So what point of a wave it is on is dependent on when and from what direction the wave of energy passed (explained in more detail in the section on quantum entanglement). The hidden variable is that time is variable locally in 3 dimensions but these variations are relational between any two or more points in the wave at any moment and the probability that we can detect the RIK as it is being passed by a wave of energy is dependent not only on the location but at what time we look.  If we blow up a balloon we know that it increases in 3 dimensions of space. If we have any two points marked on the balloon then as it inflates their distance in space increases.   If we send information between these two points along the surface then the time it takes for the information to pass between them is increased in direct proportion to the increase in space. 
All clumps of vortexes detected and known as particles cause ripples which emanate out from the matter within our reality. When these waves merge at intersecting RIKs we get other vortexes form. These ripples however have been travelling at the speed of light away from our detectable reality so we normally cannot experience them because there is no possible way to detect them physically within our known physical universe because nothing physical can travel faster than light. In order to detect them we would need to use something to bounce off them and return to us which is physically impossible. So while time appears to be one dimensional to us with a Universal time or" forward moving series of moments" this is only one dimensional relative to the light and matter detectable within that line between us or "I" and any other object, usually light travelling directly towards us from celestial bodies. It is always a single line but can be measured or detected from any chosen location in any direction we look or detect. We biologically do trillions of these calculations a second to constantly analyse our location in space and time. However any matter travelling outside that one dimensional line is usually undetected by us. The interference pattern in the double slit experiment however provides the evidence, so while objects in space seem separated in 3 dimensions and time seems one dimensional this is a misunderstanding. Time like matter is part of a Universal fabric and only exists separately relative to compartmentalized locations and is every bit as 3 dimensional.  The principle shows that matter near us in space but moving away from us in time is very real but undetectable so while still being closer in space than objects billions of light years away which are within our detectable reality we have previously been unaware of it's existence because while the far away stars, planets, quasars etc are further away they sent light directly towards us in a relatively straight line. Any matter travelling perpendicular to our line of detection it cannot come directly to us, it passes along a different dimension of space and time which is pointing in a different direction than us, as long as we are spinning (and we always are) so the light and matter that bounces off these objects never returns to us, it cant.  Just like if we are on a train with the windows open we can bounce a ball off the outside of a train that is travelling on the tracks next to our train at the same speed in the same direction, however if that train is moving in the opposite direction or any speed above or below a range relative to the speed of our train, then the ball will not make it back through our window it will bounce back too late or if the other train is moving faster it will gain too much perpendicular, added momentum and be pushed forward. This aspect of objects moving beyond our "time spectrum" is explained using different evidence found in the 4 muons detected in the decay of a Higgs Boson at the ATLAS facility at CERN. This is covered in the section on the mass of the standard model particles.

To visualise this imagine time having a curve like matter or any 3 dimensional wave, represented mathematically as a sphere/orb expanding out (for the purpose of the double slit experiment viewed as a dome moving forward  out from the moment in time at the baseline where the particle gun is) and we can view it from the side with a limited range of focus along the dome's lines of latitude, If we focus on the crest we have a small area we have a greater ability to study activity there, once we move down the dome the lines of latitude become wider making the study of specific positions more difficult as there are increasingly more points. The new principle where n is any given number in this case, unlike in "n" used as a variable number, shows that the smaller the width of the line of latitude the greater the ability to study points because there are less positions, also we know more about momentum, the detection method in the double slit experiment giving a clearer idea of where the wave crest is in time in relation to the particle gun and the wall. The nearer we get to the crest the greater the certainty of being able to study/analyse. This is essentially where most quantum observations in "real time" happen. So while matter appears like it is made up of individual particles we are only observing that point in space and time as the waves pass through the RIKs of the field which the understanding of 3 dimensional time unlocked. Matter is a collection of  vortices moving through the field which has permanent from (which is flexible and able to form transient shapes as waves and vortices of energy create oscillations returning to form after the waves pass, these waves are temporary but can last billions perhaps trillions of years). As we move down the wave of time  our ability to record material events in time decreases because now there are more points along the lines of latitude of the time wave. The smaller the time waves bandwidth the greater the certainty of locating an observable position of matter in a specific area in space and time, while the greater the size of the time bandwidth the less certainty we have of locating an observation at a specific point in space and time.

The webpage covering the solution to the double slit experiment paper which unlocked this unified field theory has a new method of analysis to cross check for 3 dimensional time.


 To illustrate why time dilates with curvature consider two runners traveling along 2 parallel roads (when viewed along one dimension i.e. from above), however one path is flat the other has a hill so the one passing over the hill still moves straight forward but her overall time is stretched due to the curvature(viewed from one dimension “above” she appears to slow down, she doesn't however but her overall time is stretched). Just as mass increases in 3 dimensions so does time.


HOW TO CALCULATE THE VOLUME OF 3 DIMENSIONAL TIME
To illustrate how to calculate the volume of time we need to assume a few measurements.
(a)a universal fixed second which I will call a cosmic second "cs" and a dilateable quantum second "qs" corresponding to the time it takes to send one unit of optical information/light one agreed unit of distance in 1cs at an agreed location which I will set at Earth sea level.
(b)A quantum bit "qb" for a unit of information.
(c)A universal unit of distance, a quantum metre "qm" corresponding to the distance light can travel in a straight line through RIKs in one cs which is through 1,000,000 RIKs at Earth sea level.
(d)A theoretical as yet undiscovered metal which I will name Zancozphoz "Zzz" whose distance from its atomic nucleus to the outside of it´s first electron orbital which is perfectly spherical is 1qm at Earth sea level and its electron orbital "shell" extends from 0.7 the width of the radius to the full radius width.
(e) a super massive planet Zob which causes immense time dilation dilating one qs  at Earth's sea level to 0.5qs at Zob's sea level.


If we set one cs as equal to one qs at Earth sea level. This corresponding to the distance we can send one qb 1qm at Earths sea level then using the formula for the volume of a shell 
1.333 x π(3.14)R³-1.333 x π(3.14) x r³
If Zzz has an electron orbital which has a shell which extends from 0.7 the width of the radius to the full width of the radius we can move 0.363qb through the first electron shell of Zzz in one dilateable second (1cs) at earth's sea level because the volume of the shell here is a total of 2.75qm
 1.333x3.14x1 (1³)-1.333x3x3.14x0.343 (0.7³)
=4.185-1.435
=2.75qm
1/2.75qm gives 0.363qb moved in one cs
   
When the atom is taken to Zob and dilated to 0.5ds in one cs because it takes one qb twice as long to travel through 1,000,000 RIKs as they are stretched to twice the distance. Then the electron orbital is also stretched to twice it's width and the electron orbital shell is stretched also so now its volume is 
1.333x3.14x2³-1.333x3.14x1.4³
=1.333x3.14x8-1.333x3.14x2.74
=33.49-11.47
=22.02qm

So now we can't only move 1/2 the amount of information (0.363/2 or 0.181qb)through in one cs. Now the volume is significantly larger 22.02/2.75=8
Roughly 8 times larger so we can only send 1/8 the amount of information 1/22.02 or 0.0454qb  of information through the first electron orbital of Zzz in one cs

This is surely not the exact formula, we surely need to factor in other variables which affect the equation also but hopefully it illustrates why time dilates in 3 dimensions. 

To try to explain time dimensions with comparison to physical dimensions imagine a ball moving forward. From afar or to the untrained eye it seems to be moving forward at speed along the forward dimensional axis but it is usually also spinning. So when one hits or deflects that ball in order to get it to go where we want it to go one takes into account the spin in three dimensions. Similarly with time while it moves forward in one dimension there are also variables happening in the other two dimensions of time which we must take into account to advance to where we want to get to. To illustrate it metaphysically, consider on a global scale the world has become predominantly focused on getting things done as fast as possible in the search for efficiency but this has ended up with immense inefficiency. While some can send a robot to mars in the assertion it is in the interest of the advancement of mankind millions are still living in mud huts with no primary education, running water or electricity, in the case of Deaf people, millions of highly intelligent people like Patrick Otama from Uganda [72] without even access to language. An immense loss of brainpower (and goodwill) which is detrimental to not only those in poverty but everyone. If one watches the film "the Queen of Katwe" [73] a good example of the slightest access to education unleasing immense intelligence that was always there. We saw with the development of fertilisers the idea of faster crops with bigger yields, though there is much evidence that this was/is untrue [77], but with these fertilisers came inferior food quality, depletion of soil microbiome diversity, loss of animal species and vegetation diversity. With such mentioned poverty comes the increased risk of conflict. While we tend to see physical objects as two dimensional we know a physical object is three dimensional defined by 3 dimensions of space. While we tend to think of time as one dimensional it is not it is defined by 3 dimensions of time. The predominant focus is on one dimension past to future. When one focuses on the present as in meditation one tends to stop focusing on the past and future by feeling all that is happening now and ultimately sees more possibilities. While we can dwell on the past which is often futile or believe the future holds a certainty which it never does (things never turn out as we imagine they will) when in the moment we can feel the vibrations of all that is possible within the moment and we are not limited by our expectations or false conclusions. It is a fuller existence because we see more of the potential possibilities. Hence why it takes intense meditation practice over years for qi/chi practitioners to be able to manipulate qi to be used in healing and martial arts. While qi energy manipulation has been ignored and often rubbished as nonsense by popular physical focused sciences scientific studies have verified that it is very real. While some of it's effects can be mimicked using fake setups by illusionists determined not to believe the evidence and prove it is all illusion, it is a real phenomenon. Thanks to excellent open minded scientists, journalists and the internet we can see examples of meditation manifesting phenomenal powers in people such as D.J."dynamo Jack" from Indonesia [75] with incredible healing powers amongst other capabilities and Gonzales Sensei [76]  who can create a sense of sleepiness in animals even over great distances. All have been scrutinised by scientific teams and all have been shown to be genuine . Essentially it seems they are all focusing on the moment and using the vibrations within that moment to exert effects on the physical world around them. Knowing there is a physical field that vibrates, it makes perfect sense that they are affecting the vibrations with their own vibrations and creating phenomenon out of the field which most people who are not centred on the moment cannot do. To illustrate it I will use the example of juggling and the egg and spoon race. While the aim is to move forward with the egg, speed is counter productive, one must first focus on the balance, get and maintain that balance while advancing skillfully. Similarly one can juggle while walking in a carnival but one cannot run while juggling or the rhythm is soon lost. In a music band or orchestra one instrument cannot improve the music by forcing all the others to go faster, it is the quality and richness of the time not the speed that allows all the harmonics to mingle and create that magic experienced by an invigorating sense of almost timeless beauty and creative power. Sometimes detected physically as chi energy gathered together in space and time moving/tingling through the spine. Similarly when we focus on getting something done as fast as possible we lose the ability to focus on all the possibilities and it often ends up counter productive. 
Time does not just dilate due to the mechanical workings of the universe though, it is affected by consciousness. It is likely everyone will know that time seems to pass by seamlessly when we are with people we love, when playing or watching a game, when creating a work of art, when doing work we enjoy. Conversely when we are separated from those we love, when we are bored, when doing work we dislike or waiting for something to happen time dilates so a minute can seem like an hour. While not measurable using mechanical means because technically the clock still ticks at the same rate that time dilation is real. While the clock still ticks at the same rate we already know that time dilates with disconnection from who or what we love, if the clock still ticks at the same rate the second still has the same length but it must have an increased width which cannot be detected in one dimensional time. To any physicist who says it just feels like time dilates in this way I would say two things first that is an assumption show us the evidence to back it up, secondly what are feelings? They are detection operators, we feel things to detect phenomenon, whether using our sense of smell to detect if food is fresh or rancid, touch to detect the shape and receptiveness of a loved one's skin, these are not necessarily quantifiable using numbers but they are real methods of detection to quantify if something should be engaged with or left alone.  Another way to visualise it is like a triangular pyramid which gives the correlation with the results in the double slit experiment when we detect for which way we are looking to increase the focus on a point so the orientation of time is towards the point and we get the mark left like a particle would leave, when we don't focus on making a point the pattern is towards the opposite side of the point, the plane so the pattern is more widespread. It seems logical that as the physical dimensions of space are characterised by curvature, the physical representation of the dimensions of time are perhaps like the visual representation of a droplet being curved at the bottom and with a peak at the top.  This shape perhaps being changed in orientation depending on whether one is trying to make a point or have fun. The obvious balance of course would logically to have a bit of both. The shape of time perhaps represented as circular but becoming elongated into points like in the drop shape with conscious focus. To any physicist who may try to argue this is just conjecture yes it is but that is what science is, conjecture/predictions followed by logic and evidence to explain a phenomenon, when it is non physical we must go with the logic alone. it is still science, perhaps not solely physical science but science nonetheless. It gives a logical explanation and using Occam's law we must go with the theory that shows the best correlation with the phenomena above and before any loose ended incomplete theories no matter how complex and convincing some of the proposals and mathematics appear which like the big bang theory can lead to ideas devoid of sound thorough logic, which need fictional theories which have no evidence to hold them together, or if it is not all quantifiable using numbers (although STT also has plenty of mathematics). It is  partly this obsession with mathematics before logic, often devoid of logic even counter to logic which is ultimately only a language form to express logic like any other generally only spoken fluently by the highly privileged and educated which has kept this breakthrough suppressed and attacked  https://youtu.be/YR5ApYxkU-U [63]. “Any intelligent fool can make things bigger and more complex… It takes a touch of genius – and a lot of courage to move in the opposite direction.” – Albert Einstein 

As there hasn't been a credible testable theory offered to explain the double slit experiment in 100 years and now there is one with testable predictions,robust logic,mathematics that work and a theory of Everything that leaves no end untied according to the law of physics "Occam's Law" STT is the correct one.

THE BUILDING BLOCKS OF LIFE THE QUANTUM FIELD
In computing we know that everything comes down to 2 things at the binary level O and I or a series of on and offs, yes and no´s, light and dark. It turns out that the fabric of space-time is made up of 2 basic things also:  spherical field particles termed “RIKs” and connecting springs/pipes “TREDDs”.  
With resistance the pipes are stretched but still holding the RIKs and they both hold passing vibration/energy through the internal flazzma in space-time.  Curvature leading to increased time with extra path between RIKs that are not touching but stretched. Extra paths because when compacted and touching all TREDDs are relaxed giving a short distance, when stretched the path becomes longer. The direction and timing of the energy wave which is moving through affecting whether it has positive or negative charge (charge explained in more detail later). When the spacetime fabric is together vibrations as matter, collectively known as planets, suns [22], black bodies [23] would theoretically move straight forward but due to the curvature of large objects by gravity pulling strands together the fabric gets twisted from straight lines into curves forcing passing objects to move forward along curved paths.

FUN SCIENTIFIC EXPERIMENT FOR ALL AGES
Here is a great, simple, fun, perhaps gross for some but fascinating scientific experiment using only fingers and saliva: if we have healthy clear saliva we can put our (clean washed and dried) tips of our thumb and forefinger in our mouth to gather some saliva (the freshest saliva can be found pouring out from the gland just under the tip of the tongue). Then if we press both tips together and pull them apart there is a thread or strand of saliva hanging between both tips. If we wait a few moments we will see the strand change into a series of spherical droplets attached by thin thread, mimicking the structure of a strand of the spacetime fabric, almost suggesting that we were made in the image of the universe. It is worth noting that while it is often said that our bodies are 70% water that is by weight. In fact 99% of the molecules in our bodies are water [78] so in some sense we are made up of almost pure water https://youtu.be/ewOjL8tFb-8  . The other 1% of molecules are much more massive than water so are by weight much heavier. So our saliva would be also 99% (or more) water with the hidden magic of the biological universe holding it together. 
 
It may be difficult to grasp at first for minds not familiar with the huge numbers physicists are used to but we must bear in mind that these RIKs and TREDDs are also being stretched and contracted within the fabric at speeds of thousands of kilometres a second as the energy passes through in the form of, quarks, atoms, molecules, planets, suns and black bodies. This movement through the fabric of spacetime is not just movement relative to our sun or even our galaxy's central black body Sag-A [24] it is movement in other directions like for example the direction our Galaxy [25] is moving as a unit through the spacetime fabric. To understand why the waves move along RIKs and TREDDs in the field but appear to hold relative fixed positions at times in space consider mini whirlpools/vortexes in a river or stream. These appear to stay in the same position but water molecules pass in their trillions. It is not the molecules or particles staying and keeping shape, these pass by at high speed it is the force exerted which maintains the shape. In the space-time fabric that force exerted is inside the RIKs and TREDDs maintaining shapes so essentially it is the same principle inverted.
  As the waves move through the  RIKs they pass from RIK to RIK so while it appears like the FUBs keep the same quantum particles they don't. They appear to stay in the same relative position in the form of matter as vortices of energy passing through the field draw them together by the negative energy created in the vortices wake. The waves looping at trillions or more times a second. They gain and shed RIKs at perhaps trillions  or more  times a second. Again I refer back to the inversion of the water vortex principle, mini whirlpools in a stream appear to hold water in place but they don't. The water "particles" pass in their trillions it is the overall pattern of the energy which maintains the shape. Similar to the principle of passing energy through a Newtons Cradle toy. As we and matter move through space we constantly get hit by incoming RIKs which the vortices and waves of energy transfer to and simultaneously we lose RIKs as they are knocked out and left behind as the energy as matter travels forward. 
It is the vacuum type effect of negative energy that keeps the energy "locked together" as waves get stuck in loops and this shape consistent as the energy passes along the quantum realm at up to many thousands of kilometres a second. So fast and the waves traveling relative to us as we observe that it appears to be actual particles of matter. It is in fact the energy passing through the quantum field. We perceive matter as gas, liquid and solid whereas in fact it is vibration moving so fast it appears solid. As a new concept for some not educated in physics it is perhaps awe inspiring or "mind blowing" that volcanoes, mountains, seas, trees, us etc can all be a collection of vortices of energy passing through this lattice keeping overall form but it is so. Similar (but not exactly) like if we have a soft ball on a string it is tangible but if we swing that at high speeds it appears to be hard and it's path impenetrable, at incredibly high speeds the orbital shape it makes as it spins makes it feel almost "solid" we cannot break its path with our hands it is spinning too fast. If we invert the effect vibrations have in matter in the macro realm we can perhaps understand better. If we have an object sitting on a speaker and we play loud deep music through it, the speaker will vibrate and the object will move. As the RIKs in the field are fixed and cannot move (only oscillate) it is the energy which is moved and that movement creates the shapes we detect. With the speaker we can sit on it or place a hand on it but after a moment we become unaware of it, we become one with it in the sense that we no longer detect it as separate, until a loud deep vibration passes through it. Then we notice, feel or detect it, the object is the same it is the vibration which enables us to notice, detect or focus on the form. Similar to clouds, we may see shapes which look like rabbits or angels or Albert Einstein or many other shapes but we know it is simply the shape created by the energy affecting the water molecules in the clouds. We can feel matter not because particles are moving through space, we feel the RIKs as we pass through them, similar to how we may run through a forest we feel branches and leaves hit us,  just like RIKs the branches stay in position as we pass and like the RIKs the branches continue to wobble (oscillate) for a while after we pass. Because the RIKs have form this is what we detect, we feel these RIKs vibrate.
Similar to how we can feel loud deep vibrations if we stand near large speakers but here it is gazillions of tiny vibrations at the quantum level. To understand why the field is termed dark matter, it stays relatively static and unnoticeable until it is disturbed, as vibrations pass they cause visible movement, consider camouflaged objects sitting on a camouflaged speaker. While at rest there is no movement we see nothing until a deep vibration is passed through the speaker, then we can see the objects as the vibration forces them to move and the shapes become visible. The objects remain essentially the same, the vibration causes the movement and all subsequent noticeable activity. 

When we have the fabric of space-time in what is traditionally known as outer space there is little to no pull on the fabric so everything is together. All RIKs are more likely to be touching in relatively straight lines 6 touching a central 1 at any given point in the field. We do not experience time in the same way there is no stretch in time. However when we look at the nucleus of atoms and on larger scales looking at large groups of atoms (planets, suns, stars etc) and get nearer these large objects the fabric is stretched out so the interval between RIKs is increased (explained in more detail in the next section: GRAVITY). Time and mass begin to come into play as the vortices of energy cannot pass seamlessly through the fabric anymore it takes more time and the resistance causes the vibrations/mass, the greater the "clump" the more resistance and time. As Einstein showed time appears to have less effect the faster we go until approaching the speed of light at which point time would seem to stop or be unnoticeable in objects outside our frame of reference. Where there is no interval there is no stress, stretch or distress, time is seamless. When we come nearer large objects these are spinning and the spin is pulling in the fabric of space-time similar to how a spinning wheel pulls in fabric around the spool. Of course it is not a single strand though, it is strands coming from all directions of the quantum field and it is around a spherical core and it is not a complete pull in of the fabric, it moves through the fabric pulling in the fabric and releasing it again as it travels past. The stretch means the RIKs become separated in the spacetime fabric and pulled out in lines towards the spinning objects centre. One cannot stretch only the TREDDs connecting pairs or individual groups of RIKs in a row along one dimension, all connecting RIKs and TREDDs become stretched also in 3 dimensions. In gravity the path of light is changed leading to redshift   [26] as illustrated on the images page on the website. To picture it consider If we send an object at speed past a water vortex [27] it will be drawn in. If it is moving fast enough its path will be changed slightly, it will lose momentum but will become straight again as it comes out of the pull of the vortex, in the field this results in a change in wavelength i.e. redshift. Other objects travelling slow enough will be drawn in and get caught in a loop spiraling in. The vortex itself moving through the water disturbing water molecules as it passes which then come back to occupy space in a relatively local area when the vortex has passed. Any objects which have been drawn into the vortex will continue moving with the vortex. The change in how we must view matter may be compared to how astronomers once thought the Earth was flat. It´s a completely new reality we have become aware of. We are not made of particles we are made of waves passing through the field particles “RIKs”. Why I emphasise this is because one of the new and unexpected truly mind blowing revelations of STT shows that we are not made of particles "we" are conscious beings "souls" existing outside the spacetime fabric holding these vortices of energy together. The logic is clear and the evidence for consciousness fortifies it, in my mind, beyond doubt. I can find no other possible logic.

GRAVITY.
Gravity is based on the stretch mentioned, not so much an actual total stretch but a stretch in the fabric caused by the momentum of the vortices of energy. The waves are still moving through the field so they can’t completely spin to gather up and simultaneously stretch the fabric but the drag from the waves still does. Just like if you spin your finger through water the water will not stick to your finger like a fabric would but the drag influences the water nonetheless so much so if you continue to spin you create a very powerful and fast vortex in the water. This fabric is being pulled in as the vibration approaches and simultaneously relaxed on the far side as the waves pass at an almost incomprehensible rate to our human minds, relatively comprehensible using numbers. With smaller objects (smaller groups of vibrations) their pull is less and they get pulled in towards the larger objects vibrational 3d vortex which then grows in mass/size. To visualise it consider a 3 dimensional lattice of elastic with axes x,y and z meeting at equal distances between every intersection. Imagine the elastic is metallic and has magnetic properties. If we pass a magnet through it the intervals nearest the magnet will be pulled together so the lattice is stretched. The closer the magnet the closer the intersections in the lattice are as it passes. In the field the space between intersections pulled perhaps to thousands, millions, gazillions... times closer to a central point than they are at rest. Using this illustration we see that the lattice only returns to it's original shape after the magnet has passed. The larger the mass of an object the more tightly the RIKs and TREDDs are pulled together leading to the shortest distance between strands. As energy caught in loops creates a vacuum type effect these loops move closer together and the places in the field with the shortest distances or smallest angles between connecting strands offer the least resistance to that vacuum type pull, so the energy moves to the point of least resistance. To illustrate or demonstrate in a class or lecture one can setup two elastic strands and slide them through 2 rings (as can be viewed in this brief video onhttps://yadi.sk/d/f19oWd2TgJNM0A or on youtubehttps://youtu.be/GVVVbq1QQbc -the channel also shows the movement of quarks in a short video). As the rings are moved with tension on the elastic the strands of elastic will pull towards each other. The greater the stretch the more the massive objects are moved along towards thinner gaps hence the faster the pull together of two tightly compacted objects. The nature of matter is to find equilibrium [28], when the fabric of space-time is stretched all vibrations are pulled with it. Vibrations being energy moving through the quantum field. Gravity is this mix of spin and stretch. When a vibration becomes entangled in the space-time fabric it can and does lead to spin due to waves entering RIKs' internal loops displacing the flazzma that energy moves through within the fabric which in turn leads to a vacuum type effect holding the units of energy together in a buildup of RIKs which can grow in clumps around each other, as they collectively displace more medium/ether and maintain tighter nuclear and torlectron loops. 
As the lattice is pulled in towards a central point the points surrounding the large objects are pulled closer to the centre creating curvature in the surrounding fabric. This means that other objects can no longer travel straight but their path is curved and at certain points creates paths which are perfectly looped creating electron orbitals at the molecular level and at the cosmic level planetary orbits around suns and suns around black bodies (not black holes). Black bodies are spinning so fast that even when light is trying to travel out the fabric of space-time is being wound in so fast and so stretched that the spin is pulling the fabric in faster than the speed of the vibration we know as light so light itself cannot escape. When Einstein proved that light [29] is affected by gravity he was proving that the vibration traveling through the invisible field (invisible at rest) was drawn off a straight path by the pull of the space-time fabric as it was being stretched by the pull of an objects spin/twist.  It is the spin which is faster than light when combined with the black body's acceleration through spacetime which prevents light from escaping.
With less density an objects' gravitational pull in the fabric is with less force so the stretch is less and objects move along the TREDDs towards the larger object with less speed. 

Although the common interpretation of Relativity has anything that passes the event horizon of a Theoretical black hole falling into it, this is actually an assumption by extrapolation assuming that the pattern continues inwards as the mathematics suggest but it is incorrect. Again we must not rely solely on what mathematics appear to show on paper we must put them into context with the laws of physics (this was Einstein's chief criticism of the big bang as recounted by one of the Merry professors Ed at Nottinghams sixty symbols channel who paraphrased Einsteins comment to De Maitre, the priest who invented the big bang immaculate conception of the universe, when he said "Your mathematics look good but your physics are rubbish!") This is backed up by observation also. When light passes a black body the gravitational shell forces light to arc outwards and travel around the black body rather than get drawn into it, Einstein showed that this is exactly what happens with light passing the sun. Any matter that is drawn in never actually gets past the event horizon. At the event horizon this is the singularity of an infinite loop (given infinite time). Any energy generated inside the black body cannot exit likewise any matter eaten by the black body is drawn towards the zone just outside the event horizon and broken down into plasma. This plasma is effectively locked just before the event horizon and its activity is unseen to the outside universe...unless it gathers more mass than what is being generated inside, which interacts and begins to emit light, at this point it has begun its identification of a white hole. The very act of energy being generated inside causes immense ripples in the field outside and begins to generate matter in the field outside the black body also. Here is where it begins to be visible as a faint glow which builds up to a bright glow and recognised as a white hole, just like our sun which has a black body nucleus whose gravity is holding the boiling hot globe of plasma that is generated by the insane amount of ripples in the field as a result of the kinetic energy of the intense friction going on and growing exponentially in magnitude and time inside. In reality the singularity IS the surface of the sphere of the internal furnace, it is the closest thing there is to a black hole. It is the zone where there is no time and nothing can enter or escape (unless disrupted in specific ways by outside forces). In essence black bodies are also white holes one and the same, white hot both inside and outside the singularity of the surface of infinite momentum where nothing can enter or leave(strictly speaking green hot, green being the most intense colour and the colour of the sun if one looks directly into it, it will likely damage your eyes if you do, it damaged mine, I can still see a visible warp that distorts the picture when I try to look at detailed images so if you want to protect your eyes trust me that is the colour of the sun when you look directly at it)
While the theory behind the current model of star formation and supernova [31] seems very convincing and well thought out there are massive problems/anomalies (that almost all astrophysicist decide not to mention when they promote their Theory of star formation as if it were bona fide verified science.) and once those problems come into the picture the whole current model of star formation and lifecycle falls apart because current physicists can't explain them and without explanation the current model remains a Hypothesis, one such anomaly is called the Neutral H problem. This is where the energy level of Neutral H is hundreds even thousands of times higher than it is expected to be or can be on Earth. I can explain it, I was able to explain it within minutes of being made aware of it because the Unified Field of STT has spacetime fabric dilation as an intrinsic part of the dynamics which explains the Neutral H problem, with such immense spacetime dilation it would take phenomenally more energy to saturate Neutral H and convert it.
The Neutral H problem essentially says the whole current model of our sun and therefore all stars must be missing something. I show it is. The solution to the double slit experiment reveals that energy is created all the time in multidimensional spacetime, all stars are white holes (black bodies in bright states), they generate their own energy and matter.  While every piece of matter creates energy most of this has so much space to escape that we dont experience most of it in the dimensions experienced by our consciousness. However inside the core of a stars nucleus, which is effectively a black Body the density becomes so phenomenal that energy cannot escape as light or matter. Contained within the system it generates and grows matter and light within the core, growing exponentially as matter creates more and more matter within a closed system. As it does so it creates intense ripples in the surrounding fabric which is stretched due to the incredible compaction of the fabric into the core by the gravity. These ripples create light and matter which grows and grows, gazillions of megawatts of light are pumped out every second as torlectrons and subsequentially matter are formed, at the same time ripples emanate out through the fabric and are detected as neutrinos. Most of this matter mainly Neutral Hydrogen is held by gravity and pulled back towards the core by the intense pull of the black body nucleus.

It creates different elements at different energy levels and degree of spacetime dilation and goes through regular cycles where the energy becomes so intense and the matter so unstable and reactive that the outer layers explode in nova, micronova and supernova events. Every time it goes supernova, it loses most of the outer layers but still holds a slight amount of energy as a faint glow and builds up again over perhaps hundreds of thousands of years, perhaps millions of years, at incredibly large sizes at intervals of billions of years depending on the size, going supernova at intervals as the cores continually grow. This cycle repeats until they reach a level of such immense magnitude as a dark black body where they are so large they encase virtually all the energy and keep growing. At this energy level it seems the angles in the fabric become less and less conducive to forming matter (manifolds) outside the event horizon and they become fully fledged dark black bodies dark, foreboding and continually growing exponentially all the time. While dark black bodies appear to be dark and mysterious from the outside they are phenomenally hot and bright inside. STT disputes the theory that information can be lost in a theoretical black hole. Optical information can't, some matter would certainly be smashed when matter is shredded passing a black body. what does escape is kinetic energy in the form of vibrations as the black body's movement sends ripples out along the spacetime web detected as gravitational waves and at great distances perhaps as axions).   The twist faster than the speed of light however is not a total spin of the fabric, it is a constant push and pull in tiny increments. When going with the momentum the fabric moves faster than the speed of light and as it is pulled back any light that is headed out of the black body has two possible events at the event horizon. First either it meets the pull back and is twisted into a vortex as temporary matter such as electrons for example. This then gets carried back into the black body. When the black body is in the part of the increment moving or twisting the fabric forward with the momentum it is too fast for light to escape so any light is absorbed back into the mass. This twist back and forth happens at incredible frequency with the forward twist longer than the backwards twist giving an overall forward twist in spiral galaxies.  Using STT I also refute that infinite all consuming singularities exist anywhere in the known universe. They exist only in the imagination, good cartoons, great sci-fi movies and the stomachs of teenagers.

While the common belief is that neutrons are at the core of neutron stars the maths and logic indicate it is a soup of torlectrons. Not just within neutron stars but also within all suns, black bodies and even planets like our own that have hot cores. They generate energy at mind boggling rates at mind boggling temperatures. It is the combined negative pressure of their vortices pulling the fabric of spacetime together that acts as the source of the gravity. Essentially white holes (suns, as explained in the section on White Holes) are massive generators of pure electricity that power and create Everything else in the universe. That energy usually escapes as neutrino waves detected along one dimension as a neutrino but above a certain density that energy can no longer escape and the exponential growth from a planet with a hot core and black body at its centre, maybe the size of a grain of sand or a tardigrade's egg or smaller has begun and will continue going through the cycle of white hole, supernova, larger white hole supernova etc until over billions or trillions of years it reaches the size of a full grown, full blown, dark black body and looks set to keep growing as the Universe itself keeps growing. 

By far the best and most scientific source which gives a critical and highly objective critique of current astrophysics models I have come across is the work of Astrophysicist Pierre-Marie Robitaille on this channel. Much of what he deduces from mathematics is consistent with what I have deduced from the common sense logic that arises from the structure of the spacetime/dark matter lattice.  https://youtube.com/c/SkyScholar
Pierre-Marie gives a highly detailed review of current models showing where they are inconsistent, he does this using verifiable evidence and mathematics. He also avoids doing what has led to many crisises in science, in physics the tragic demise in and departure from understanding in Theoretical physics, jumping to hasty conclusions, stating them as fact and becoming protectionist/dogmatic when they begin to fall apart, Pierre-Marie's is a much more scientific, honest and responsible approach. Unfortunately as a particle physicist he doesnt get everything right and his outright dismissal of dark matter is a massive mistake and very dissapointing. Even so he gets a lot correct and contributes important critical information which helps diespel the big bang hypothesis.
Pierre-Marie explains in his videos that a surface is needed for pressure to exist which is inconsistent with the current model of star formation. What I imagine immediately after watching his evidence is the most obvious solution which solves the problem. He makes a very good case for why the current model of star formation from gas is illogical because we need a surface to begin with from where gravity can begin to overcome the repellant force of gas molecules. What seems immediately obvious to me as the solution to the problem is....water. Water is more than likely the substance which gathers together in sufficient quantity in outer space to form an object which can trap/absorb enough matter to begin acting as a celestial object. It perhaps begins as droplets absorbing dust and gas, growing into large clouds and or bubbles and a core of mud or sludge gathering. This no doubt increases the gravitational pull over time to such an extent that it becomes so dense at the core that the energy gets trapped and we will likely find the beginning of a celestial black body that generates it's own energy. It is another process that surely will take a lot longer than the 13.8 billion years proposed by big bang theorists and again it indicates another reason why the big bang which violates every known law of physics is incorrect. 
 
 If stationary black bodies do exist (which I now believe is possible after seeing Anton's video here https://youtu.be/DWE8kWsSckc) they would not actually be black. They would act like mirrors similar in a sense to the mirrored balls found suspended from the ceiling in old time dancehalls . The only conceivable way a stationary black body could exist is if the TREDDs were contracted so tight no flazzma could move through them. In such a case that no light could get out none would be able to get in either so would rebound back out into the Universe perhaps making them the brightest objects in the Universe. Unlike spinning black bodies which are phenomenally hot inside and move through the spacetime fabric, stationary black bodies will be stuck in the fabric. Caught in a specific area like a solitary rock in the middle of a stream. Unlike the spinning supermassive dark black bodies which can aggressively eat more mass and energy as light the stationary black body like the rock stays in exactly the same position in the spacetime fabric and generates mass very slowly over time as energy passes it in the field. It draws matter towards it but most of the matter is likely repelled and passes by. Only objects of large mass will be drawn into it and unable to escape. These objects must be of a certain size relative to the size of the black body. The heaviest element is predicted to have an atomic weight of 137 and it is likely that beyond that size of a collection of protons and neutrons the next object up may be a mini black body which can attract and hold atomic nuclei but in the process they lose their ability to hold electron orbitals. They become so heavy and cause so much drag on the fabric that they slow down and eventually stay stuck in the fabric. This perhaps explains at least some type of sinkholes, as we travel through spacetime our planet at times passes a location with a stationary black body which rips a hole in the planet's surface.  It many only be a few millimetres or less in size but draws in all the mass it passes. The energy and heat of the Earths core would likely rip it to shreds and the magma cool down long before it can reach the surface but not before it rips a hole in the surface. Such black bodies may be as much a part of extinction cycles as asteroids and micro novas and we may never see it coming unless we learn how to spot them which should be possible by studying the shape of movement of any mass that surrounds them. We may not be able to move the planet but we may be able to move populations away from the expected region. In time we may find ways of detecting them before we are near and blast them apart with controlled nuclear explosions. That is IF they exist.

FUN GRAVITY EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES:
two people stand opposite each other and hold two skipping ropes both looped through one bracelet. If one person stretches her arms out the bracelet would be pulled to the person opposite if he keeps his hands together. This is kind of like the principle of gravity. The bracelet is pulled by gravity to the narrow end of the ropes which is usually at the ground on planets surfaces but in matter because all the atoms are spinning the spin of the atoms in an object(like a ball) as it touches the ground have huge stored energy in their electron shells. So the impact of the incoming ball bends the space time fabric slightly but the outward force of light spinning through their electron shells rebound the field back and sends the ball flying away again and it bounces back up a bit like a ball off a spinning wheel on a bicycle that is turned upside down or a person off a trampoline a bit but not exactly it's kind of a mix of a bit of both. Eventually it feels the stretch or pull of gravity again and is pulled back towards the ground, every time it lands it is sent off again but with less energy until it slows a bit with every bounce/rebound, until it stops and stays relatively still. It is never fully still though it still has gazillions of atoms spinning and it is still moving through space time at phenomenal speeds . 

When we bounce balls off the ground it is partly because the ball is made of trillions of atoms spinning kind of like wheels they exert huge pressure on the field and when a ball hits the ground they are hitting trillions of atoms which are also spinning like wheels causing both surfaces to exert great outwards pressure so the ball is sent flying away again. In the case of a rubber ball it is the ball which acts like the trampoline causing the field to stretch and rebound within it's sphere.If these atoms didn't have light waves spinning through their electron shells at huge speeds they would neither appear solid or have that internal energy to push other objects away again. Some objects bounce better than others partly because their atoms are closer together so collectively their atoms exert
more outward force,partly because their surface distribution is less so there is more opposite energy concentrated to the smaller points of impact and partly because in material like rubber the electron shells are both tightly woven and in a sense closed so not able to absorb energy from or pass energy to other atoms' electron orbital shells, so less energy is transferred between them on impact and the bounce back is stronger. The tightly woven atoms act like a tightly bound trampoline. . 
ORBITALS OF ELECTRONS (Added 25 July 2019 up to "radiation") PLUS THE STRUCTURE OF NEUTRONS AND PROTONS ADDED 1st /Aug/2019
The energy/vibration travels forward in all directions as it moves. In the quantum world the object/vibration/energy can only move forward but as the fabric of space time becomes curved that path also becomes curved hence why torlectrons (perceived as electrons) get fixed in orbitals around an atom's nucleus. In effect the strong force/interaction is merely where perfect loops are formed so energy is contained to spin within them, the weak force/interaction is where the paths do not form such perfect loops and energy can escape. Quarks movements are always 2 against one 2up 1down 2down 1up etc. Each quark made up of 13 RIKs in Newton and Gregors´ 13 "kissing balls" shape as explained previously. One "RIK" lost by each as a gluon shared with another. All RIKs essentially the same, carrying energy travelling as waves passing through the field, when passing between quarks the RIK is detected as a gluon, when travelling along a path it is detected as an electron and collectively when moving through loops in internal paths of groups of RIKs as FUBs detected as quarks, muons, taus, and the large bosons. While gluons are detected in labs as having no mass on their own they act as "bridges" at high tensions so their masses are distributed and detected in the overall mass of the standard model particle.  Hence why the mass of a proton [34] is 1836 times more than an electron. 1728 being the cumulative stretch caused by the twist and “wobble"/mass of the 12 RIKs in each quark 12³ plus the cumulative spin of the 3 shared gluons binding them by shared pull 12 x 3 kissing balls “FUBs x 3 gluons 12x3 by 3 orders of time dilatiom 108+1728 giving us 1836 altogether. The reason a Neutron has the neutral charge is explained in the section on charge. To simplify here: the path of the internal torlectron is such that it crosses over it's own path virtually immediately and the charge remains inside. In the case of a neutron conversion to a proton is where the internal looping wave crosses over its own path seemingly giving the mass of two electrons due to that momentary double push adding to the momentum in that RIK. It changes it's shape enough to hit another external RIK sending out the energy and mass of an electron and an anti-neutrino so it loses just enough momentum to change into the proton shape and mass, losing the mass of about 2 electrons due to the loss of the momentum of one torlectron and the dampening down of the equivalent force of one RIK. It however now has a very strong loop and the internal wave doesn't cross over itself making it extremely stable. (While this may appear inconsistent with the mass of quarks it is the exchange of energy between RIKs acting as gluons that is responsible for the seeming discrepancy. The 3 FUBs are being interacted with at such a rate that they appear to be less mass than the overall FUB. The smaller quark is twisting against the two down quarks so they are able to maintain more of their mass in the tug and pull) While there is an estimated extremely long lifetime of the proton this is obviously conjecture and because it has an extremely strong self sustaining loop I see no reason why it should decay over time as particle physicists predit it would, especially as STT shows that energy is created in 3 dimensional time. The only factor which could cause it to decay, that I can see, is entering into conditions which cause nuclear reactions. in fact it seems likely it would become even more stable over time perhaps reaching the stability where it takes increasingly more energetic conditions to cause such nuclear reactions

Where the single defined energy unit is the amount of energy of a wave passing through a single RIK (this passing known as an electron). The RIK has one position and it's wobble/mass is the product of the momentum of one passing wave. In the case of standard model particles larger than an electron the overall mass is the overall number of positions (RIKs) involved by the overall compounded momentum of passing or looping waves.
We can use the equation for the volume of a sphere again to show the probability of locating a position. If the time unit is a quantum tik "click" which is the time it takes light to travel the radius of one RIK. Then one click gives us the volume of the RIK as 0.5238. 1.333 x 3.14 x 0.5³=4.192x 0.125 we get the number 0.5238. If the time is tripled so now it passes from the centre of the first RIK and through another in every connecting direction that is 3 RIK radius' so we get a volume of 14.1 which is almost exactly 27 times the volume of one RIK which is 3³. Which is the amount of RIKs directly connected in the universal shape of the field so now we have 27 times less chance of locating a standard model particle's position. If the time is extended for the wave to pass the width of 2 connecting RIKs in every direction (5 radius lengths) we get a volume of 65.312 which again is almost exactly 125 times the volume of one RIK and 125 times less likely to locate a standard model particle's position. So we get the equation for the probability showing the value of time t is inversely proportional to the value of position "x" to the power of 3 (and vice versa) so where n is any given number nt is proportional to 1/nx³ (nt∝1/nx³), if we increase or decrease the time we increase or decrease the amount of RIKs affected in every direction by the volume of time to the power of 3. 
But we don't want the whole wave we only want to detect in the area which corresponds to the back screen. So initially we set the possible area of hits as the back wall so the range is the area covered from the particle gun to all positions in matter in between the gun and the back screen. So some hits will arrive on the front screen and never make it through to the back screen while some time we get waves passing and interfering leaving marks on the back wall. So we get a cone shaped area between the particle gun and the back screen. However when the wave hits the front screen it forms the 2 secondary waves after the slits and we see the interference pattern form within the widest circular area of the cone which is on the back screen. However when we set detectors the cone is reduced to 2 paths each shaped like a triangle (similar to that of a thin slice of pizza with its crust cut off) so the thinnest part extends from the particle gun through the slits and the widest part corresponds to the area where we see the twin bands on the back screen. The detection is set up and if the wave crest hits within a certain time it registers the passing standard model particle. If no wave passes within that time bandwidth it detects nothing but the wave crest passing the other slit still hits the back screen as it arrives within the bandwidth of time set to the crust end of the pizza slice on the back screen. We also have to dilate the time because with mass the field is stretched so it takes longer for energy to travel the same amount of RIKs in every direction so time dilates in 3 dimensions. So the smaller the bandwidth of time the greater the certainty we have of locating a specific position because there are proportionally less positions plus the less the momentum the greater the chance we have of detecting it.




THE OCEAN TIDES AND THE MOON
The ocean tides are affected by the moon because as the moon passes it is pulling the fabric of space inwards causing the surrounding fabric to be stretched/expanded. This causes the surface fabric on Earth to be stretched also. This stretches the size of the electron orbitals in water molecules and collectively the entire ocean and all molecules are drawn to where the angles in the fabric are acutest. When the moon goes out of view the electron orbitals return to size but with a slight bounce giving the secondary high/low tide.

 MORE ON THE EQUATION TO DEDUCE THE SHAPE OF FERMIONS, MESONS AND BOSONS
. 
m=(4/3.πc³-El.Mev/c²).ne.nx.p.3Δt
I will continue with the Higgs Boson which is different than normal matter in the sense that whereas normal matter as we know it which is relatively stable is usually created in nature by a single wave looping inside the RIKs, others like the heavier quarks are engineered in high energy accelerators by forcing in more vortices of energy:torlectrons. The Higgs Boson needs 3 torlectrons to enter loops simultaneously or almost immediately one after the other to hold shape hence it has only ever been detected in high energy particle accelerators. What happens is this. The force of one torlectron entering at a specific angle and wavelength loops and creates negative energy in its wake (similar to a pulling undercurrent in ocean waves) which draws in all 13 RIKs into the FUB shape which wobbles, detected as mass and that wobble/mass accumulates as each subsequent torlectron hits almost instantaneously one after another or simultaneously with each other. So each of the 3 torlectrons entering causes a mass of 13³ which gives a total mass of 6591 times that of a single RIK's wobble ie. An electron. However there are also moments where each torlectron arrives travelling from the core of the FUB to hit a RIK head on stretching it away from the group so we have the mass of an electron moving away from the momentarily stable FUB. Meantime there are also the 2 torlectrons travelling with the FUB structure with their momentum each adding to the momentum by 1/3 the force of an electron not the full electron mass as the RIKs are now touching and the waves are moving in the FUB except not directly opposite the stretched and extended RIK because their overall directions are away from the Higgs centre which when both are compounded is 1/3². So we have 
13³ x 3 x ((12 x 3) + 1 + 1/3²)= 6591 x (36+1+.111)=
6591 x 37.111 = 244599 times the mass of a single electron going by the standard model [5] where an electron is 0.511 Mev/c² and a Higgs Boson is 124.97Gev/c². This is soon hit by a 4th wave of energy disrupting the loops allowing all 3 waves to escape, the shape collapses completely and the other 3 waves escape in an instant. I predict when detection is developed fine enough the sequence of events will be this, the 13 ball structure appears and grows in mass as it is followed by 2 almost immediate impacts followed by a moments of a RIK stretching outwards as the single wave hits the RIK head on with the "mexican hat" shape caused by the 12 RIK FUB spinning simultaneously around the axis of the extended RIK's pull, then the 4th torlectron hits and the shape collapses with 4 torlectrons escaping to form the associated by products. Currently we are only seeing part of the sequence due to the limitations of 3 dimensional time, the detail I expect shall be expanded as technology advances. We should also eventually detect the FUB shape existing for tiny moments with a single torlectron arriving, forming a manifold and leaving in a lifespan much shorter than any other "particle" in the standard model, perhaps dozens, hundreds or even thousands of times shorter than the average lifespan of a Higgs Boson and with a mass of about 6.643 Mev/c² being 13 times the mass of a single electron. Explaining at least some of the "virtual particles"


Muons are where pairs of 2 FUBs each share one central binding gluon giving pairs which are connected to 3 stretched/extended RIKs as "free gluons" which are stretched banging in and out adding to the wobble/mass 12 + 12 RIKs sharing 1 = 23 (2 bound FUBs) x the the mass of the 3 stretched gluons and strands = 69  we get the collective wobble/mass of the spinning pairs and stretched "free gluons" giving us the 3 moments of time dilation 69 x 3 giving 207 times the mass of a wave passing through one RIK i.e. an electron. Because a Muon is two conjoined FUBs it's forward momentum spinning around a single central axis is very strong as it is balanced unlike in protons and neutrons where the fact there are 3 means it's direction alternates constantly between 3 axes. So the muon can penetrate matter to great depths with great force. The larger than expected magnetic dipole moment however is due to the slight imbalance from the odd number of 3 channels acting as gluons where the current/wave is detected passing between the 2 FUBs.

The tau is 4 FUBs held together by 6 RIKs acting as gluons  because the shape is so tight the middle RIK in each FUB is being cancelled out creating no mass at the centre of the FUBs and the RIKs closest to the centre of the shape don't give any effective mass. so we have 9 constant core RIKs in each FUB, so we have 9 x 4³ giving us 576 x the extra wobble/mass due to the collisions between the 6 connecting gluons giving us 3456.  This time because the shape is so strong there is tiny time dilation. This time all six RIKs act as gluons,  This time because the shape is so tight there is miniscule time dilation only occuring every time one FUB stretches away from the group. From my calculations I am getting around 0.33535 of a stretch in time, with 3 moments of this time dilation that is 1.00605 x 3546 giving 3476.9 times the mass of an electron. The exact figure may be different, it is difficult to tell with various figures online but the overall shape and dynamics seem to make logical sense.
Mesons are where the wave/vortex is being transferred between 2 FUBs but rather than spin around alternating between 3 axes like neutrons, protons and taus (neutrons and taus spinning on all 3 axes while a muon spins on one moving forward on it also) it is moving around 2 separate 3 dimensional axes. Each of the 2 FUBs  is spinning around one axis like if we had 2 cogs in any machine say a clock for example and we had the clock suspended from a pulley with the 2 cogs being focused on spinning, one spinning clockwise one anticlockwise, both facing upwards and pushed forward down a tightrope. The machine would move forward and the cogs would spin on their individual axis one clockwise and one anti-clockwise while moving forward along the tightrope acting as another axis for the both.Because the energy wave in the meson is passing between the 2 FUBs head on back and forth unlike in protons or neutrons where the momentum is shared in 3 directions it is stretched slightly farther apart which makes it's detected width 1/5 more than the width of protons or neutrons. I will leave this one not calculated so anyone can try the formula for themselves.

The W and Z bosons are where 2 torlectrons enter into loops and create the FUB shape. 
The difference between them due to the second wave arriving from a different direction relative to the first. Similar to how a ball could be kicked forward with spin, top heavy or bottom heavy like the W bosons or almost perfectly, head on like the Z Boson. So the Z Boson's spin is directly forward on the axis of the path the FUB is moving forward on. Another illustration. In the W bosons the direction of spin depending on which side the second wave arrives, sending it spinning forward clockwise or anticlockwise. A bit like if we put a spinning fidget on a skateboard and spin it then push the skateboard forward. It will spin clockwise or anticlockwise as it moves forward depending on which way it was spun. These waves both arriving at the same spin as the first wave compounding the spin. If the wave arrives at an opposite spin it becomes a Z boson. Cancelling the sideways spin completely and hurtling straight forward. So we end up with roughly 2/3 the energy of the Higgs Boson times the moments of RIK transfer. So in the Z Boson we have the 13 balls creating the accumulative 13³ x 2 waves of light entering loops. Giving us 4339 compounded again by the three moments of time dilation where RIKs are gained or lost as it travels forward. In the Z boson we get 13.67778 x 3 giving us 41.0333 x 4339 giving us approximately 178453 times the mass of an electron. The reason for 13.67778 is based on the idea that as it travels forward there are times when it's transferring connection includes the 14th RIK which squeezes in as one is released at the back. So momentarily the mass is increased to reflect that extra RIK. The W bosons are spinning around an axis which is perpendicular to the forward path either clockwise or anticlockwise so they never get hit head on when transferring RIKs, their transferring RIKs hit from an angle. So they have 4349 x (12.05779x3) =4349 x 36.1733=157318 times the mass of a single electron. The reason for the 12.05779 is based on the idea that their rotation along the perpendicular axis constantly leaves one transferring RIK almost fully extended losing kinetic energy to the field at the back.

 These figures are difficult to give exact calculations for the energy loss or gain in RIK transfer as there are so many different figures for the W and Z Bosons mass online in standard model charts, often rounded at 3 decimal points in a Gev/c² which may seem a small number but it is hundreds in Mev/c². Remember also that our observations in 3 dimensional time reflect that average mass happening within specific moments, other moments go undetected and may have other varying amounts of wobble/mass.

A correctly calibrated simulation will surely show that a perfect orbital path only happens at certain points corresponding to the inner and outer zones where torlectrons spin around the nucleus of each individual element. The logical assumption is that these paths intersect at certain points allowing waves as torlectrons to cross paths and share orbitals around other elements creating compounds as in covalent bonding. For heavier elements as the core structure becomes larger it inherently becomes less and less uniform and uneven leaving its spin unstable and its paths less able to follow symmetrically perfect orbital circuits both of which lead to energy escaping i.e. radiation.) These nuclear standard model particles clump due to the vacuum effect in the flazzma and the tightening of the TREDDs allowing short paths to move (gravitate) towards each other, this becomes surrounded by layer after layer of more tightly woven RIKs eventually forming planets, suns and at ever continuing speeds gaining momentum to become a black body/dark star. To test this part of the theory one could build a model simulation of the field I describe on a computer. Then compact the central RIKs into the 12 kissing ball “FUB” structure and build it up from there. One should find that what began as a cube based lattice with straight paths between rows of balls immediately begins to show curvature. This will become more curved as the nucleus grows with the modeling. What one should find eventually with fine tuning and experimenting with different structures of larger objects formed by the "kissing balls" is objects that explain/make sense of the precise properties of quarks (and other subatomic standard model particles ). We should also see that the straight paths eventually curve at certain points to form perfect looped paths around the nucleus. These will correspond to the known shape and distance of electron orbitals around each elements nucleus. The size of every nucleus determines exactly where these perfect orbital loops form.

2021 VIOLATIONS OF THE STANDARD MODEL OF PARTICLE PHYSICS AT CERN AND FERMILAB
2021 violations of the standard model of particle physics by the muon g-2 [102] and beauty quarks [103] are perfectly consistent with my model. Many of the science communicators explaining the news to learners in educational videos and articles online, actually every single one that I have watched and read have made a huge mistake. They have all said the muon is 200 times the mass of an electron, it is NOT it is 207 times the mass of an electron, that is 23 x 3 x 3 which the reader will have read I discovered over a year ago when applying my formula to deduce the shape of standard model particles. More specifically the muon is made of 2 manifolds each with 13 field particles making 26 altogether each manifold having 11 field particles clumped, sharing one that connects them at the centre (11x2)+1=23 plus 3 particles acting as gluons which become forced out from the centre due to the centrifugal force, this increases the overall distortion of the field as mass by a factor of 3 (3x23=69) the non symmetrical structure of 2 manifolds and 3 gluons causes the instability that creates the greater than expected wobble of the muon plus the fact they are stretched means they create quantum time dilation which again increases the mass by a factor of 3 giving the total mass as 207 (23 x3 x3) times that of an electron. Again I have tried to engage physicists to look at the model that works and again I usually only get feedback from trolls in the form of insults and condescension, I have tried to explain that virtual particles coming in and out of existence makes no common sense, manifolds coming in and out of existence due to curvature like ocean waves breaking into surf do make sense. I have tried to explain that is where the standard model is wrong, they are not particles travelling through empty space they are energy travelling through the lattice/fabric of spacetime or dark matterhorn cosmic web, or Higgs field or electromagnetic field, whatever you want to call it, it is all the one thing. Energy gets caught in whirlpools/vortices as torlectrons which then get stuck in different shaped manifold loops within the field. With the beauty quark decay showing its decay into the muon or electron happening in unequal than expected results is in my estimation due to physical factors affecting the beauty quark on decay. Its orientation in space and time relative to the Earths spin and/or magnetic flow surely causes it to decay into one or other with relative consistency. However we must be cognisant that there are many other factors that can affect that equality. I expect gravitational waves, Earth tremors, perhaps even collisions with waves of neutrino from nuclear reactors can all potentially be at play. The fact that the torlectron is the basic building block of matter including the muon upholds the fact it is the electron that will be more often found upon decay. While a beauty quark decaying may be poised to decay with an electron rapidly morphing into a muon with the specific dynamics of the field any slight collision from even a neutrino wave could potentially knock it ever so slightly but just enough that it cannot then form the muon manifold loop and so decays into the electron or to be more precise the torlectron continues to travel without morphing into a muon.
 


PARTICLES AT CERN BEING LOST IN DIFFERENT DIMENSIONS OF TIME.
While reading about the Higgs Boson I noticed the results of different observations of Higgs decay indicate an anomaly which can only be explained by the dimensions of space and time. The mexican hat shape and the mass both indicate that spring time theory is correct that there are indeed 3 torlectrons creating the standard model particles however with decay we usually observe 2 "particles" or in one instance at least 4 muons due to 3 dimensional space and time (consistent with Einstein's Special Relativity). Initially I thought the photon would represents the basic wave below a certain energy moving through the field disrupting the Higgs manifold so I initially thought there should be 3 torlectrons escaping. What it shows however is that the shape itself is momentarily stable until another torlectron hits the "hat". This is what knocks the loop paths out of sync and the waves escape and the shape collapses. The only logical explanation which can explain the apparent anomaly of usually 2 but sometimes 4 standard model particles detected escaping is that the 4th wave arrives, collides with the Higgs B and on decay two torlectrons released as "particles" are usually released forward in time while two are usually sent backwards in time, in the case where 4 muons were detected upon decay of a Higgs B at the ATLAS site (shown in the image on the wikipedia page for the Higgs B [64]) it is logical that the specific angle and/or wavelength of the 4th wave arrived and sent all 4 travelling forward in space and time. I predict that we should also see the Higgs B decay into 3 standard model particles or one occasionally and perhaps on a very rare occasion into none as all 4 waves are lost in other dimensions of time. In fact because we have evidence of the Higgs decaying into 2 photons suggests this has already happened, all 4 torlectrons morphed into smaller manifolds outside our detectable range of time and the only evidence making it into our detectable time range are the 2 photons which happened to be emitted in our direction as byproducts of 2 of the 4 transitions which all happened outside our detectable reality. This is consistent with Einstein's law of special relativity. Why? Objects travelling outside our frame of reference seem to slow down and stop as we move away from them and approach the speed of light. Once we exceed the speed of light we will see nothing. No single object can exceed the speed of light but the combined speed of 2 travelling away from each other can. A photon travelling away from us at the speed of light will disappear from our detectable reality/range if we are stationary or travelling any speed in the opposite direction which combined with the photon moving backwards in space and time exceeds the speed of light. Of course the photons still exist in "universal time" but they are now outside our reality. This can be proven easily if we can send a standard model particle that we can identify backwards in time to disappear from our reality, have a deflection instrument already setup in the past so when the "particle" hits that deflection it bounces back towards us and we can "catch" it as it comes back into our frame of reference. Sounds like science fiction? In fact it is not we do it every day when we look in a mirror and we have a high tech experiment setup on the moon which does it regularly. The mirror we look at was setup in the past and some of the light bouncing back would usually move away from us never to enter our reality again but in the mirror it seems to. Even if we hold a mirror as we watch every "particle" of light we are experiencing ourselves as we were in the past, that light sent from an event we experience as the present, which was located in the future relevant to our brains detection centre. Sent back in time to our detection centre from the future so the emitting event then becomes our past, perhaps a few femtoseconds but in the past nonetheless, the reason we can see it is for two reasons first because using our consciousness we adjust our time focus to register the light returning at a location in our brains which is further back in space and time from the light which was sent from a location in the future relative to our minds. So while it appears like the same time we know this is impossible we must be "seeing" the image which was sent from the future. What we are doing is we are setting a time bandwidth to record that image and adjust it in our minds using perhaps femtoseconds to appear like the present in our experience. The fact we have hearts means we pulsate constantly and the fact our bodies vibrate at known frequencies and the fact everything around us vibrates and the Earth itself wobbles slightly means the mirror constantly moves towards and away from us in microscopic distances all the time so we constantly have some images coming towards us in space and time some moving away which we never see. The variation is so slight we register the light coming from a source which is moving towards us in space and time in our consciousness as "the present". The light not returning is in fact irrelevant we build the image with what we have. To visualise this imagine we are standing beside a child's car tyre swing bouncing a ball off it. It will bounce back towards us if the swing is moving towards us, if it is swinging away from us and we throw the ball at the same speed the ball will usually bounce off weakly and not come back to us but fall on the ground in between us and the swing.
 The solution to the double slit experiment (paired with this paper) shows that the speed of thought/conscious waves are phenomenally faster than the speed of light so if we were experiencing time in every moment without adjusting the time bandwidth in our consciousness we would never see our reflection in a mirror.

As far back as 1962 astro physicists have been bouncing lasers off natural mirrors on the moon as reported in the Dec 1966 edition of National Geographic (note 3 years before NASA claimed the Apollo missions werwere the source of these mirrors) 
The mirrors  on the moon should show that we have the same or almost the same number of photons returning to the detection device in relation to photons sent when the moon is travelling towards us in space and time. Conversely we should have less photons arriving back at the detection device in relation to photons sent when it is moving away from us in space and time.   This should be easily verifiable by sending single identifiable photons towards the reflectors on the moon. For example if the moon is directly above Nairobi and we send 1 million photons towards the moon over the course of 10 minutes from New York, where the moon is moving closer in space and time, we should detect 1 million or very close to 1 million coming back (allowing for the occasional unaccounted for wobble, perhaps from a moon quake or a small gravitational wave) if however at the same time we send 1 million photons towards the moon from Mount Fuji, which is moving away from the moon in space and time, over the course of 10 minutes we should detect significantly less photons arriving back. The missing ones sent backwards in time never to enter our reality again. In the ATLAS apparatus it is perhaps the phenomenal energy causing immense vibration absorbing and sending the waves back in space and time never to be detected. Just like in the swing analogy if we throw the ball at random intervals the law of averages would show that within a given time frame 2 would usually hit as the swing is moving towards us and bounce back into our hands and two would hit and bounce weakly as the swing is moving away and land on the ground. However occasionally depending on the timing of which position the swing is in regarding it's forward and backwards path we may get 3 hitting the swing as it is moving towards us and coming back and 1 hitting the ground or all 4 hitting the swing as it is moving towards us and 4 coming back or 1 hitting as it is swinging towards us coming back and 3 hitting the swing as it is moving away and hitting the ground or all 4 hitting as the swing moves away so all 4 landing on the ground. While on the subject of the Apollo miSsions...

THE APOLLO MOON MISSIONS... NEW PROBLEMS GIVEN THE CORRECT PHYSICS
As already mentioned pop culture is led to believe that the Apollo missions left mirrors on the moon but the historical records show they were natural formations and used to bounce lasers off the moon by astrophysicists at MIT as far back as 1962. This is just one bit of misinformation among a slew of false data that one starts to see when looking at the claims of the Apollo missions.  
After inserting this section I came across this video where Buzz Aldrin offloads his confession note, with his hand on his heart, not to the world but to an unfortunate bewildered 8 year old girl that he never went https://disk.yandex.com/i/D7efKWSMDDv3CQ  . https://youtu.be/afbwLiOC1s4
Full interview (download and keep as backup while it is still online)
https://youtu.be/Y4UP6nRMuGs
In this video 2 space station astronauts admit that so far we can't get humans out from close Earth orbit but hoping someday we will. https://youtu.be/ymIH-Lg5Ark


Few people not even moon landings skeptics would dispute that NASA sent spaceships up to the moon between 1969-1972 however what is beyond possibility is that they ever sent humans. They simply didn't, it's impossible for humans to survive far beyond close Earth orbit. Later in this section I summarise some evidence that already enabled millions of sceptics to successfully figure out that NASA never sent men to the moon but first I will explain the new physics in the quantum mechanical dynamics of time dilation revealed by Spring Time Theory to explain why it was impossible. Spring time Theory shows that time dilation is in fact spacetime fabric dilation which affects the measurement of time not the passing of time. So space, the spacetime fabric, the physical lattice also known as dark matter is dilated near the surface of large massive objects like planet Earth. This is the environment that our bodies are designed to live within. Our bodies are built on the planets surface range of space dilation. If humans were to try and move out beyond close Earth orbit every molecule in every cell in their body would be subject to space contraction. This means not only would they be crushed to a fraction of their size that contraction would compress the energy levels in electron orbitals. As 99% of the molecules in the human body are water molecules and water being such a great conductor of electricity a human body undergoing space contraction would be subject to immense radiation released from the electron orbitals within water molecules. The water molecules may stay intact but all living processes would be completely destroyed and rendered impossible. Many close Earth astronauts have given accounts of experiencing flashes of light (radiation) within their own eyes. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_ray_visual_phenomena and this spacetime contraction would have been many many times stronger thousands of miles out from the planets surface.
In a sense saying a man stood on the moon before understanding the physics of spacetime dilation, commonly detected as time dilation,would be comparable to someone not understanding the physics of ocean water and who assumes that water is the same density regardless of depth.
Such a trickster may show a stage show or film with special effects depicting a man in a wetsuit, gas tank and lead boots claiming he was walking on the bottom of the ocean floor at the Mariana Trench. However with a knowledge of the actual physics we know that such a man in reality would be crushed to death from the immense outside pressure of the water exerting tons of pressure per square foot, long before he ever set foot on the bottom. It is the inverse effect that would happen with space contraction in outer space. Such a man would have every molecule in his body crushed from the inside out. He would in fact either explode like an egg in a microwave oven because of many organic molecules losing bonds and being sent into free space as highly reactive gases or he might glow with light as his body is fried alive from the inside out from the radiation. Either way there is simply no way humans could survive for more than a few seconds inside a relatively thin spaceship with no shielding from outside radiation and no way to stretch the fabric of spacetime to accommodate their human bodies and protect them from internal radiation. The quantum dynamics of why time dilation is actually spacetime fabric dilation is explained briefly in this 3 minute video. https://youtu.be/iViiLyfyLSc This also explains the neutral H problem in the suns photosphere, neutral H needs phenomenally greater levels of energy to convert it into positive H while under such immense spacetime dilation which is covered elsewhere in the paper. While underundergoing space contraction electron orbitals become compressed leading to a build up of pressure in the ether/flazzma forcing the release of photons as radiation. With trillions upon trillions of atoms in the human body that potentially adds up to the thermal power of a nuclear bomb perhaps several within one human.



For those who have never questioned the moon landings nor looked closely at the physics below are a few facts and oddities that opened the eyes of millions around the world to the greatest lie ever told. It is worth noting that this is not just a trivial or small matter, as with many hypnosis methods a timing device is used, the most famous perhaps from the early days of cinema is where the predatory magician swings a pocket watch in front of his victim, the moon is also a timing device and this illusion has ensnared and in a sense helped in dumbing down the intelligence and free spirit of mankind like one would expect from such a hypnotism. This in no small part adding to the many dysfunctional and dystopian type regions around the world where people live in almost unbearable, inhumane conditions, with unimaginable distress and pain in a world where there is potentially unlimited resources and no reasonable excuse for any human to suffer any unnecessary pain. So it no doubt adds to the struggle I have had in trying to wake up physicists from their delusions and false models. As most educated people know, humans are very resistant to change and coming out of a state of hypnosis or any psychological entrapment in itself can be very traumatic and surely why so many have resisted embracing or sharing my work even though they can see that it is scientifically robust and far far superior to the big bang and standard model of particle physics under any type of measurement or scrutiny. So some readers may still be struggling to break free of that hypnotism and may still find this physical evidence (although very straightforward and conclusive) hard to believe. 
 
SOME OF THE ABSURDITIES THAT MAKE THE APOLLO CLAIMS RIDICULOUS
(Note:NASA seem to have teams of scientists online trying to rebutt and explain these absurdities in publications and in forums online and many videos with incriminating footage that reveal gaps in the lie have been removed. However when one gets down to detail their arguments which are usually highly complex aimed at confusing and leading sceptics into highly technical but irrelevant physics, soon fall apart.)
Outer space is awash with solar radiation, any human in outer space and not protected by the Earths magnetosphere like people in the international space station are without which they would be subject to immense high energy gamma radiation from the sun.
On the Earths surface radiation from the sun is transformed into convection heat and heats up the gas in the surrounding area so it is a relatively slow process taking a few hours. On the moon there is no atmosphere so no way for that heat to dissipate. The radiation coming off the surface would fry a human in seconds. The amount of gamma radiation coming from the moons surface is calculated to be 10 million times stronger than normal light in this article. https://www.zmescience.com/science/news-science/the-moon-is-actually-brighter-than-the-sun-in-gamma-rays/ NASA's excuse is that they always landed during the solar morning but this is ridiculous as can clearly be seen in the article. The Earths surface heats up slowly in the morning because it takes time for the gas to accumulate heat. On the moon there is no atmosphere so the heating up would be on the solid surface and within minutes reach temperatures of well over 100°C.
The cooling system they claim to have used in their backpacks was based on water yet any water in such systems, just like the water in a human body would have reached boiling point within minutes perhaps seconds of exposure to the level of gamma radiation found on the moon's surface.
When some of the Apollo film is speeded up the wheels on the moon buggys or Lunar Rovers throw up dust in a trajectory that is identical to how desert dust is thrown up by such a vehicle on Earth. As can be seen in this video https://youtu.be/hU4wJFYQjtQ
Given that the moon has roughly 1/6 the gravity of Earth and no atmosphere to cause friction and slow the dust down these rovers should be throwing sand dozens of metres maybe even miles into the air.
Some moon rocks were presented to the the Netherlands by Buzz Aldrin and Niel Armstrong, when these supposed moon rocks were analysed by Dutch geologists, rocks which I personally believe came from places like Roswell where asteroids fell to Earth, they discovered that one was made from petrified or fossilised wood. It seems whoever collected the asteroid rocks from landing sites made a mistake and lifted some petrified wood instead. https://www.dutchnews.nl/news/2009/08/moon_rock_gift_is_petrified_wo/
When astronauts on the space station have tried to go out from close Earth orbit they have experienced bright flashes of ligh in their eyes and returned to close Earth orbit. This is exactly consistent with what I mentioned above that the human body would emit radiation from inside the molecules of cells within the body.
It is worth noting that there were no reports of witnessing flashes of light in their eyes from Armstrong, Aldrin, Collins or any other Apollo crew members until after those witnessed by astronauts on the international space station and those working on the Hubble telescope. There seem to have been literature added later saying they did but no mention of such flashes remains on any original recordings of Apollo crew talking. The Hubble and International Space station would still have been relatively close to the Earth so still relatively little space contraction would have happened, however at even a few hundred of thousands of miles out from the Earth it would be phenomenal compared to close Earth spacetime dilation.
NASA claimed for decades that there was no water on the moon until this was proven to be false when the Indian lunar probe discovered water on the moons surface. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2009/sep/24/water-moon-space-exploration-india NASA of course kept agents involved in the mission and forced the Indian scientists to wait and allow NASA claim the discovery was theirs ONE DAY before the Indians announced their findings.
Many other oddities have been described by moon landing debunkers including the fact the noise from the rocket engines on the lunar module would have been deafening but on the first performance Niel Armstrong and Buzz Aldrins talked over the radio with no significant background noise, no dust was thrown up from the moons surface as the module supposedly blasted it with rockets to stabilise it's landing and the same later when it took off to supposedly return and dock with Michael Collins on the main ship that remained in orbit.
Tardigrades, an extremely marvelous wonder of biology, a beautiful, tough microscopic animal that can live in extremely harsh conditions on Earth of extreme heat and cold, acidity and alkalinity is the only animal to successfully survive going into outer space where there is significant space contraction. It does this by slowing down it's metabolism to such a degree it almost appears dead, dehydrating itself, removing almost all the water from it's body and going into a state of extreme hibernation. It protects itself from various different kinds of radiation, extremely high levels of xray radiation quoted in this article, radiation that any Apollo crew would have been exposed to on their journey and even more so on the moons surface.  https://cen.acs.org/biological-chemistry/biochemistry/tardigrades-survive-space/97/i41
NASA claimed to have put reflectors on the moon which helps measure the distance of the moon from the Earth using lasers and still are yet the reality is that men are not needed to place reflectors, they ooccur in natural formations on the moon and were being used to bounce light off the moon using lasers as far back as 1962 by scientists at MIT and this was covered in various scientific journals and publications of the day. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiment
In some of the footage which is supposedly from different missions we can clearly see that the same film set is being used, with slight adjustments.
Regarding the films and photographs in none of them can any stars be seen. One assumes if they were to recreate the stars they would have to be exactly correct or any astrophysicist would have spotted they were fake, trying to light up a film studio with thousands of stars in exactly the right places and keep them moving in line with the moons slight but constant movement just seems to have been an impossible task, so they decided not to show show any stars. The film and photographs themselves show the suns reflection undergoing diffraction in various astronauts helmet visors.
The claim by NASA that the stars were essentially blotted out by the glare of the sun, because there would have been no atmosphere to diffuse the light, however this is in some ways difficult to argue with considering there is no truly independent source of photography...however when questioned about it Niel Armstrong and all the crew members stated they NEVER SAW ANY STARS at any time in outer space, except when using optical equipment, which we know must be a lie because even from the space station the view of the cosmos is said by astronauts to be phenomenal. This short playlist from a great Apollo critic who has done an excellent job over the years talks about the lack of stars. https://youtube.com/playlist?list=PL2500B25F29642D3C
NASA claim that if it had been faked the Russians would have exposed it immediately. However the Apollo missions were masterminded by a rocket scientist who as an ex Nazi and close friend of Hitler "Werhner von Braun" who along with 1,600 other top Nazi scientists was given a new life in the USA in return for working for NASA, https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wernher_von_Braun the Russian space programme was also reported to have been staffed by many ex Nazi rocket scientists who had also been "poached" as some of the sought after Nazi brainpower after the end of WWII. So both teams were in effect being partly run at the top level by Nazi staff.
On psychological grounds the body language of the Apollo crews was extremely subdued. If anyone watches a sports team give a press conference after winning a major tournament the joy and excitement is phenomenal. https://youtu.be/2NHQkGFuWw8 Athletes can often hardly contain themselves, they talk over each other, laugh uncontrollably, even cry at times, the emotion is phenomenal. Even in this press conference for the finding of the Higgs Boson all speakers are enthusiastic, articulate and engaging even when facing tough questions about the legitimacy of putting so much funds into the project https://youtu.be/AzX0dwbY4Yk
Yet in all the press conferences with Apollo crews after supposedly completing what surely would be the greatest feat of human endurance, courage and ingenuity ever by humans, the body language is more akin to suspects under interogation, questions are very carefully vetted and no doubt rehearsed yet still are answered with long silences and stuttering, with the first Apollo press conference one could almost hear a pin drop at times, every question is answered slowly and with uncertainty. A short clip is here https://youtu.be/-RcKLAo62Ro a longer clip here, https://youtu.be/BI_ZehPOMwI The crew pause and often look to each other as if looking for someone else to answer, clearly under pressure that they try to relieve with nervous smiles and laughs amongst themselves not with the audience. One film of when they were in quarantine in a pod apparently to readjust to Earths atmosphere we can see where Buzz Aldrin tries to smile for the cameras but his bottom lip and chin begin to wobble like a guilty crying child's would, not the tears of joyful triumph  ( he has however kept the show going ever since and apparently used the reputation to gain riches and sexual favours from scores of young women in awe of his facade of marvelous courage and reputation.).
When all scientific arguments fall apart most commentators seen in videos online often from the start resort to calling anyone who questions the claims as idiots, #$@ends, lunatics, freaks, conspiracy Theorists. NASA employees resort to the 2 favourite answers which are ridiculous, firstly that it would have been harder to fake a moon landing than actually go. They claim thousands of employees and even factories would have had to have been in on the secret but this is not true, only a few top level teams would have needed to know. With huge salaries and perhaps the threat of killing family members for "traitors" (the plot of patriotism also used) these would easily be kept it secret and perhaps many tried to tell the truth but never lived long enough to do so. The mathematicians, manufacturers of parts, engineers, could have been completely unaware of the totality of what was truly going on. The last tool is the same as the average Apollo supporters, to call people insane, conspiracy theorists, idiots and other names.
These are just brief major points there are thousands of pieces of physical evidence that other scientists have uncovered over the years. One of the most famous critics who was not afraid to explain the science during his lifetime was Bill Kaysing, much of whose work still remains online at http://billkaysing.com/

ELECTROMAGNETISM/ELECTRICITY 
It follows on logically that electromagnetism [35] is a phenomenon due to a combination of actions  The basic principle is that waves of energy pass through the fluid/flazzma within the field particles/RIKs and connecting pipes/TREDDs. This is within a range that does not cause vortexes within the flazzma within the RIKs, is known as the "electromagnetic spectrum". It also causes positive and negative magnetism due to flazzma moving in and out of as well as between RIKs or collections of RIKs.  the charging of batteries is where extra flazzma and torlectrons are forced into strong electron orbitals which can hold the extra pressure,(these outer electron orbitals are those with torlectrons which make the fine lines that run parallel to the fine structure spectral lines known by the fine structure constant. These torlectrons are not usually detected due to their speed, range and where they are detected. The regions which they occupy are known by current academic physicists as "the sea of electrons") the extra pressure of the medium expands the diameter of the connecting TREDDs and builds up pressure in the orbitals which are woven in a continuous network in battery material and the medium/ether is able to flow along most metals which have strong electron orbital connections also. The pressurised energy is later released when contact is made where electron orbitals touch and torlectrons pass back into and through conducting material which also have electron orbitals which connect in a continuous network. Elements which do not conduct is where the electron orbitals do not touch to form a perfect linked up network or torlectrons are not free to move from their orbitals so energy, series of pushes/collisions, cannot be passed through in streams. 

Magnets [36] are essentially pumps that pump the medium that flows through the field in at one end and out the other by the suction caused by wave rotations in electron orbitals. The torlectrons orbiting through electron orbitals in magnetised materials rotate in one direction while the RIKs are in a specific orientation during their twist so pull the medium/ether which waves move through in at one pole and expel it out the other. This pulls in most metals because their electron orbitals connect creating channels/paths facilitating movement of the flazzma through in currents/streams, The reason other elements are not pulled in is because their electron orbitals are not touching or the torlectrons in orbitals are not free to move so the medium being "pumped" in passes by and they remain relatively unaffected. Slightly but only slightly nudged by the passing current.

When magnets are used to generate electricity they are working in 2 ways. Firstly they are physically moving the ether or current in conductive material along the channels of flow, mobilising trillions of torlectrons to move. Secondly they are also creating more torlectron vortices in the ether/flazzma, the current applied from the curved angle twists the ether/flazzma into more vortices, partly why charge can still be emitted as electric shock from material that has no energy moving through it. When we rub a balloon with our hair for example that's what we are doing, we are using friction, applying pressure to the field and twisting the ether to create vortices/torlectrons which then pull more ether towards them providing the pull on other objects.
Electromagnetism is described at the quantum level using electron volts which I describe as the push detected as voltage or in matter as charge and mass. flazzma is pressurised in electron orbitals by pushing in more flazzma. This either using magnetism to push in more flazzma like extra hosepipes might be added via inlet connections to a pipe to increase the internal flow or medium through the pipe or using kinetic pushes like sunlight hitting a solar cell causing the internal mechanism to push against the flazzma creating extra waves and vortices (torlectrons) which force more flazzma along electric wires and into technology or to be stored in batteries. When it arrives at the device those waves and the torlectrons they carry push another mechanism which generates it's function. In batteries it is pressurised flazzma caused by pushing extra flazzma and torlectrons along electron orbitals in metallic wire or by making the batteries out of elements that release pressuriesed flazzma or compounds that release flazzma and torlectrons when their composite elements are combined. When the connecting metal which the flazzma is pushed along is removed, the pathways are closed and the energy is stored inside looping in electron orbitals. Once connected to metal again the electron orbitals touch so waves and torlectrons are released out into and through the flazzma and arrive at devices to push against mechanisms to produce the function (for example to be released as a wave of light, within a carefully controlled frequency to dictate its colour, back into the universe to  light up a smartphone screen pixels, push it's speakers to play a song, preferably very funky, https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=nM0Fl2MnV5Y  or push the mechanism that makes it vibrate).

FUN ELECTROMAGNETISM EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
To illustrate the effect consider an aquarium  if we hit the surface of the water a wave will spread out in every direction, if we have bubbles sitting along where the surface of the water meets the tank when a wave arrives at the  tank's sides  it will push the bubbles upwards, in our eyes the side of the tank is a piece of tissue in our eyes that gets hit by the wave and sends the message it was hit at a certain frequency to be processed in our brains as colour this and many other messages of being hit by waves of colour, sound, touch etc are sent to be processed by our phenomenally brilliantly efficient brains billions of times every second, even in our laziest moments we are a soul living within a mind bogglingly marvelous incredibly active  biological machine. In electromagnetism this wave  is what we detect as light and what is detected by machines as microwaves, x-rays, gamma rays etc. We always only detect one part of the wave however just as we can only watch one bubble or clump of bubbles on one  area on one side of the tank get hit and move at a time. We can also use inside the water under the surface to understand magnetism if we insert a pump any plastic objects will remain where they are as the pump passes. However any material which is saturated or has water passing through it say for example a piece of paper will be drawn towards the pump. In physics metals are saturated with flazzma that is able to flow in and out and so is similar to the paper being pulled to where the water is being pulled the metals are pulled to where the flazzma is being pulled. This is why two magnets will repel away from each other if they have similar charges due to having a large amount of field medium being expelled, similar to if one had two water pipes shooting out water it would be hard or impossible to get the two pipes nozzles to meet. For opposite charged poles the flow causes a pulling together. This effect is also related to synchronisation, every vortex detected as a particle is pushing forward/expelling flazzma as the wave pushes forward and the wake of the wave is pulling it in to bring the pressure back to equilibrium. However because particles are not moving particles (as they were traditionally believed to be until now) what is being detected as positive or negative charge is the waves passing through the field particles being detected in one orientation of the RIKs twist. Although for example waves detected as having negative charge may be pulling in flazma in one direction of a twist during detection they will also be expelling flazzma with a rebounding twist back but because this is outside the time bandwidth/RIK orientation (being focused on) it is not detected.  The field particle (RIK) will be left behind in the field as we continue to move forward through the field with our focus on every current RIK or current collections of RIKs being passed. The opposite also applies, if a particle is positively charged there will be flazzma being expelled in the time bandwidth of detection/orientation of the RIKs twist but when the flazzma is being pulled in with the waves wake this will be happening after or outside the "window of detection" (this being a window of time as in a window of opportunity). So whatever action is happening within detection the opposite action (whether that be a twist pushing flazzma forward out or the opposite twist pulling flazzma in) will be happening in the field after the detected action has passed. So it is outside the scope of focus, it cannot be detected as it is outside the window of detection, essentially it is now left behind in the field as we move forward and happens unnoticed after we and our detection device/s have passed...and left it forever behind sitting where it has always been since it came into existence never to be passed by us again.

In lightening we have mainly water and other materials which have strong connections between electron orbitals and which have had extra energy as light forcing extra ether/flazzma into these orbitals and also forming extra vortices (torlectrons) as they arrive at curved angles and are twisted into spins. The water (hydrogen and oxygen) electron orbitals in the atmosphere being saturated with energy coming from the sun which build up and when the atmospheric pressure builds matter is compacted to touch more often and release massive amounts of energy along the connections formed by the pressure of that matter creating networks of connections, on the ground where water in the soil and conducting material has built up extra electrical pressure from sunlight also. So where these two pathways are increasingly pressurised they both seek paths along the new connecting networks formed due to pressure. These become highly mobile with gazillions of excess waves and electroms being moved along newly formed connections as electron orbitals are able to touch and move massive amounts of energy/pushes in an instant, the excess resulting flow of built up energy is not released through the network but hit "bottlenecks" and the waves generated by the kinetic impact of these waves hitting massive amounts bottle necks in dark matter are forced out to travel as free energy/light again and the vibrations of trillions of torlectrons hitting bottlenecks causes massive vibration in the field causing the huge cracks of thunder. The spacetime fabric or dark matter is literally shaken violently by the impact.

Skyquakes where there is thunder but no lightning is due to phenomenal amounts of torlectrons being moved along paths causing the fabric of spacetime/dark matter to be shaken by the collective momentum but not with enough resistance achieved in individual bottlenecks to actually release strong waves out as free moving light again. 

CHARGE
Charge [36a] is a measure of the direction the flazzma is flowing due to the path of the torlectron and that interaction in 3 dimensional time. There are only two actions, either the torlectron is arriving pushing flazzma out or a wave has just passed and the back current pulls more flazzma in. This is happening trillions of times a second when the particle shape is held. When two quantum objects "particles" are emitting flazzma and they are aligned opposite to each other they repel each other like two pumps expelling water would. There are only two events happening but that event becomes synchronised or out of sync depending on the alignment. Hence why negative and positive act the same as each other when aligned. They are aligned opposite to each other in space and while a positively charged object is detected as emitting flazzma in one direction of space, when it is aligned opposite another positively charged object in space the push of the flazzma out is at the same time so they repel each other. When a positively charged "particle" is aligned opposite to a negatively charged particle the inflow and back current are aligned ie. the push of one happens as the other is pulling in and the two flows are unified into one which leads to the overall pull. So any two similarly charged "particles" whether negatively or positively charged are actually just reflecting the moment of push or pull defined by a clockwise or anticlockwise type spin (it is in 3 dimensions so it is slightly more complex than clockwise anticlockwise but the principle is the same.) When both are the same charge one push is synchronised to happen the same time as the other push and they repel. When they are oppositely charged the push and pull are synchronised to happen at the same time and the flow is unified between both. 

The reason there is no charge in neutrally charged particles like the neutron is where the internal path of the torlectron is such that it crosses it's own path almost immediately so the pull and push happen so fast the external pull/push is negligible and the detectable net charge remains 0 With neutrinos the oscillation is not to do with flazzma moving within the particle (RIK) it is to do with the connecting threads (TREDDs) oscillations. Neutrinos are ripples passing along the spacetime fabric so have nothing directly to do with the movement of the flazzma. Where it is due to waves in the flazzma there is no charge the wave is itself the  rhythmical oscillating wave so it is simply detected as a photon so they have no charge. A neutral "particle" like a neutron has an internal torlectron whose path comes back on itself in such a way so the pull and push cross over at points very close to each other giving no accumulative detected charge to the particle. It pushes and pulls effectively at the same time so no external interaction happens with any surrounding medium or "electric field". The fact they have a magnetic moment supports the assertion that there is a wave detected but is cancelled out almost immediately and before it can have any interaction with an external magnetic or electric field. "Particles" with neutral charge having those internal pathways that cross on each other virtually instantly lose momentum rather rapidly as the internal wave gets constantly divided and thus weakened and soon cannot hold the shape of the loop and decay.

FUN CHARGE EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
If we have balls being thrown between players in 2 teams both teams stand in a circle and throw the balls along the outside in one direction say ten players in each team with five balls in each team. If they are standing in a gym and we tie the gym teacher to the ceiling so she can only look down what she sees is two circles throwing balls either clockwise or anticlockwise. If they try to synchronise the flow of the balls between teams what happens? If they are both passing the ball clockwise or anticlockwise every time relative to the teachers view, when they try to pass a ball between teams at the intersection the balls will hit each other every time and bounce off each other falling outwards in random directions and the flow does not transfer between teams. This is because while they are passing in the same clock direction the transfer point between the teams means where they meet they will have opposite head on directions. The balls hit each other and fall rather than join flow, the game stops every time so so the two loops do not merge, they repel, in the gymit is no fun, the game has no attraction. When one team is passing the ball clockwise and the other passing it anticlockwise relative to the teacher they can easily pass the ball into the other team and at the same time receive the ball from the other team because now while the direction of the balls around the circle is in opposite clock directions where they meet to pass balls the direction of the flow becomes momentarily aligned and the balls move across between teams and into a different clock direction easily and the players keep the game flowing. It is great fun and the attraction is there to keep playing. In the particles the loop is created and intensifies the energy creating a strong connection.
. 


PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT The photoelectric effect [35A] is a clear example which demonstrates that photons are waves detected inside the field that collectively produce all effects. The photon in the effect hits an electron orbital in a metal at a low frequency and it is absorbed by the electron orbital. If it arrives at a certain frequency or higher it is deflected back into the field with increased energy from the momentum of knocking off the electron orbital's phenomenally fast circulating current of torlectrons in the flazzma. The force of the current twists the incoming flazzma wave, the photon into a vortex a torlectron which passes through the field twisting the RIKs as it now moves with added force causing mass hence detected as an electron. The light must be below a certain wavelength to be absorbed by the  electron orbital.  Once absorbed it can move through the metal as it is conductive material and it either increases the charge or heat emmitted by the metal or both. Or if it has enough energy it is deflected with added momentum from the force of the electron orbitals energy and deflected back into the field as an electron.  Just like any revolving object it must be approached below certain energies, usually defined by speeds for something to grip and stay on. If it arrives above a certain speed it will not attach and be flung off with any added energy from the transferred momentum of the rotating object.
FUN PHOTOELECTRIC EFFECT AND COLOURS EXAMPLES FOR ALL AGES
To visualise this imagine running towards a carousel at a funfair or a spinning roundabout in a playground or if a person runs and jumps at a carousel they must do it at a certain speed, if they arrive too fast they will be unable to get a grip of anything to hold onto and will be flung off swiftly. In the photoelectric effect this grip is at the electron orbital. If the light is below a certain energy it can grip and join the fun spinning around the atom. If it arrives at a higher energy it can't grip and gets sent flying back out.
The popular idea with the model of particle physics is that the electron is ejected by arriving photons and for a while this left me with an error in my paper because again I accepted something which was stated as if it was fact when in fact it was an assumption. It seemed to make no sense to me but given it was presented as fact I had to try and accommodate it and I did so uncomfortably. We are told that an electron is ejected out from an electron orbital and I have seen it illustrated as such also, so one torlectron leaves the orbital and moves into a higher state in a new electron orbital. This makes no logical sense because firstly for another electron orbital to form the lower one must be saturated so if an electron were a particle it could not form a higher electron orbital while the lower one isn't full. So it isnt an electron being ejected, another assumption presented as fact. This bothered me and exhausted me for a long time because I accepted it was fact the way it was presented then I realised something. This MUST be an assumption because the measurement problem is that we can only measure in one dimension of space and time so we can't accurately measure how many electrons are in the electron orbital at any one time, we can only infer using patterns built up over time to calculate how many there are. It seems to me however this must not have been done with the photoelectric effect because if it had we should see that there was no electron lost there was an electron formed and sent into a higher electron orbital. If it was done there must be an error in the process somewhere. It seems this was in fact Einsteins biggest blunder, another incorrect Nobel prize awarded for an incorrect interpretation. I explain in my video on Bell's Theorem why this is incorrect. One way to test this is to actually do what should have been done before promoting an assumption as fact, that is to find a way to actually measure how many torlectrons are in a single atom before and after the photoelectric effect is performed. I am confident that such a test will show that I am right and Einstein was wrong. That there is no torlectron ejected but a new one is formed. 
This effect is partly why we can see different colours. The atoms are spinning at different energies so light bounces off objects at different energies and we see those energies as different colours. Black is like where the roundabout is spinning with low energy so everyone can get a grip and stay on enjoying the fun even the toddlers and grandma. White is like where the teenagers have made it spin really fast and everybody who tries to jump on can't grip so get flung off again at high speed/energy. All the colours in between are like where some can grip while others can't and we see different colours like people sent flying at different speeds. 
Fluorescent "glow in the dark" colours are where the high energy ultra violet radiation hits the electron orbitals against the spin and is slowed down to those distinct colours we see in lipstick, body paint and clothes when there is enough darkness for them to be visible brighter than most reflected light from within the visible spectrum.  Phosphorescent "glow in the dark" colours which continue to glow after the light source has gone is due to energy being absorbed by the electron orbitals but whose looping path is sent slightly out of symmetry so part of the wave is emitted each in an instant but collectively at different times.  Some emitted immediately but others held temporarily in the loop with that part of their energy escaping later.  Each at a different moment making the intensity decrease slowly over time as each atom releases energy one by one until progressively fewer have energy to release until all have released it in a sense like a cyclist turning a corner or a complete small circular track at a speed too high to keep on the track and goes flying into a nearby field, some manage to hold their bike for longer around the corner but all those moving at a certain speed(energy) or above it  are destined to get flung out sooner or later. 

PHOTOSYNTHESIS(added 20 Sept 2020)
Here I will explain a speculative hypothetical system to illustrate how in principle plants use waves of light and how they are manipulated to capture and store energy in photosynthesis. This is not necessarily technically accurate it is more an illustration of the principle. When the light is used to bond carbon dioxide to water to make sugars using electron orbitals we can actually come to understand how this is done by looking at the structure of the harmonic oscillator I drew in the picture at the top of the page. A while ago I had access to a computer and I tried to make an animation using the app "Blender" to convey the theory. Although I spent days working on it I couldn't get it to work, I was taking too long to learn how to use blender and other pressures of simply living homeless took over and I never got to spend enough time to complete it but one very important thing I noticed was this. As I worked with the cube shape rotating it through space what happened at a certain angle was that a very distinct and well known unmistakable shape was very clear at a certain rotation. It is the six pointed star of David. Later I considered that maybe this is what makes photosynthesis possible. The bacteria or the bacteria housed/evloved to live within the plant performing photosynthesis is catching light within a very specific orientation of the spacetime fabric as they pass (probably simultaneously as the 6 waves which are the molecules/psi spread out) so they can align 6 carbon dioxide molecules with 6 water molecules and bind them together in such a way that they form carbohydrates.  This releases the oxygen by absorbing enough photons to saturate, expand and knock the electron orbital out of sync for long enough to break the covalent bond, releasing the oxygen and some energy out as green light. The remaining carbohydrates have immense charge/pressurized flazzma(ether) and torlectrons inside. The carbohydrate is later acted on in another orientation of the spacetime fabric or by conscious focus creating stress in the spacetime fabric to release that energy again, usually within the nuclear power plants we know as mitocondria. The way this is done seems very simple in terms of the mechanics (the biological conscious process is mind bogglingly stunning, awe inspiring which I will leave for a later time). The mechanical process seems to be that the conscious beings have manipulated matter into formations and designed them in mitochondria to stretch the fabric so the electron orbital is stretched so much that it breaks the loop that holds the torlectrons inside. These torlectrons are released between different electron orbitals in different energy states and also out from the molecules completely to drive the processes within all the living cells that use sugars, the stretch breaks the covalent bond again to release Carbon dioxide and water back into the biological system.  The fact that there are six elements essential for all known life (carbon, hydrogen,nitrogen, oxygen, phosphor and sulphur) is also almost certainly very significant and linked to this "star of David" moment.  In principle what the bacteria colony (which is basically what all evolved species even humans are) seems to be doing in plants is building a frame with molecules of tightly compacted mass. This frame then stretches the fabric of spacetime as it is passed turning it into a kind of fishing net which catches electromagnetic radiation in a constant stream. This causes more energy as more pressurized flazzma to build up in the electron orbitals and the process binds the carbon to the water, it releases oxygen and a small amount of energy as green light, creating carbohydrates as packets of sweet stored energy (packets of sweets as essential treats for the hard working bacteria if you like) as we travel through the cosmos. So while you may perceive yourself as being a soul within a body in reality you may in fact be a soul in a single bacteria who has been given (or won) the honour, privilege and responsibility of steering that biological machine. When we look at things this way we are no more or less conscious than any plant, animal even bacteria on the planet. Every living being/vehicle/biological body on the planet is built upon the exact same genetic foundation called LUCA. [77a] We are just another soul in a LUCA pod with the good fortune to be able to experience much more freedom, information, movement and romance than any other LUCA pods on the planet, with that good fortune however comes great responsibility, which is something humanity has become extremely, dangerously oblivious to. While a plane or an ocean cruiser may be extremely complex and carry thousands of passengers and a skateboard is a simple machine and carries one there is still essentialy one driver needed to "captain" or steer the vehicle. That driver essentially has the same consciousness/awareness of who he/she is but the awareness of the environment and the possible ways to travel through it is vastly different. It was a certain aspect of this dynamics that I understood almost a decade ago which led me on my path to find deeper truths eventually leading me to easily solving the double slit experiment shortly after I came across it. I realised the significance of the star of David moment this morning after dreaming about the significance of the bubbles in the fish tank that I used to illustrate how our eyes detect light. After I woke up and tried to interpret what my dream meant (which I always do every night since starting to keep a dream journal many years ago) I could find no significance until after hours of thinking about it I fell back into a slumber. I next woke up after having a dream where I saw countless numbers of trees being cut down everywhere I went. I was furious in the dream and losing my temper with the people, the idiots, who were cutting them down. It immediately struck me that the dreams were making that link of light hitting a membrane to perform the mechanism of photosynthesis. As  I walk the streets in the night trying to find an electric socket to charge my now empty phone battery I am realising this will lead to understanding everything from how exactly amino acids are formed (they can already be created in labs but like teleportation how it works has until now been a mystery) it will explain how viruses are formed, likely how species evolve by manipulating
 DNA. I mention this because while I will continue figuring out how things might work I am, as always aware there are many more experts than me who will understand how the mechanics of biology work much faster than I can now that I have provided the unification of the field. If someone begins to take this seriously they can access it and get to work straight away. One thing it shows is that  as I say elsewhere in my papers I state that the concept that we are mutants (born from random mutations which prove to be useful for survival) is extremely unlikely almost impossible. We as conscious beings like trees are conscious beings as clearly proven in the works collected by Tompkins and Bird [77]in the 1973 masterpiece "The Secret Life of Plants" we are not mutants we and trees are highly intelligent life forms creating new possibilities in our offspring which will improve their chances of survival for longer more enjoyable periods of time. All life forms are intelligent, all have conscious awareness to an extent, to a lesser or greater degree and evolution which is beyond doubt true is as a result of that intelligence designing better bodies for future souls coming into the realm of life via their species, intelligent design, not necessarily from an outside God (outside consciousness) but from an omnipotent omnipresent consciousness that is the Universe alive and conscious in every place within spacetime.

(Dreams are NOT our subconscious organising and processing all the information we take in during the day. I and many others
https://youtu.be/q3GEEgGEb5k
 have had dreams where I get information about something which will happen but I couldn't possibly have known. Like not seeing someonefor six years then having a dream I was swimming underwater I came up to be face to face with her in the water in the local swimming pool (hi Fifi x). The next day as I was walking I met her...as I walked my usual walk past...the swimming pool. Another more sinister dream was where I witnessed a grown man get into bed with a young girl 11 years old. A man who was due to look after a child I knew. I made sure it was me who was left in ward of the child when it's mother had to work and needed a minder. 3 days later I was told he had been arrested for having a sexual relationship with an 11 year old girl. I believe we all have the same going on. Whoever or whatever or however that information is transmitted is a mystery but it is happening every night in every human mind. One may call it God's answer to our prayers. People say that God never answers their prayers yet they don't keep a dream journal, they don't wake and write down every dream they have. We all have them, for me 1-4 every day or night depending how much I sleep. Experts say it is an average of every 90 minutes for most people. I find if I don't sleep for a long time, for a day or a few days that if I nap I may have a dream every 5 to ten minutes as I try to stay awake but fail, I slip into a sleep and wake at the end of a dream. If one doesn't listen or pay attention to one's dreams one cannot get any answers given. Mistakes in interpretation happen all the time and no doubt every person will interpret their dreams differently, I find books about what dreams mean damaging to my understanding. Everyone can figure out what their dreams mean with practice. Different things have different values and significance to each individual so "dream manuals" or "dream dictionaries" cannot be universal and some that I read when I was young led to me missing the true meaning which looking back was much more obvious but now it is too late. The point is dreams are not just information we take in, it is some kind of universal system of information sharing. Perhaps when we start to communicate with highly sentient plants we will understand some more aspects that still remain hidden. I would say the vast majority of my dreams maybe over 90% appear like jibberish but once I start to write them down I begin to remember more of them and possible interpretations come into my mind. Most still remain a mystery but I often get just enough to make a life changing decision or realisation, which I could never have figured out without the dream. Christina Noble a homeless woman was led by a dream to a place she never heard of and ended up running an international organisation protecting children. Martin Luther King's dream added immense power to the change in peoples attitudes to each other. Countless cultures have folklore built around events stemming from dreams and countless individuals have testified how they have preducted future events.



A few things which the unified field paper reveals which are vital to understand what is happening in photosynthesis are these (I will use different metaphors but the principles are all linked). Light is waves of energy moving through stationary particles which  wobble/twist, what we are viewing as green light is NOT discrete packets of green particles. Just like the interference pattern on the double slit experiment they are waves of many different intensities and frequencies merging detected at peaks as green light. Next be aware that energy quantised is a push. The next thing to consider is that electron orbitals which either absorb or deflect these waves have rotating vortexes looping through closed paths (kind of like a small ball spinning around inside a big ball an electron is a part of a photon wave caught spinning in a vortex/torlectron through the spacetime fabric). Whether they absorb or deflect any incoming energy depends on on: the frequency *the angle *the pressure. If we compare it to a racetrack of runners, say hundreds of runners running in a track 300 metres in one circuit and the runners have a steady pace of 1km per 5 minutes each. Let's say then a wave of runners want to join the circuit without breaking the flow they will have to arrive at specific frequencies/intervals and angles. If they arrive at any speed against the flow they will break the flow and lots of runners will collide and push against each other. Luckily sunlight arrives from one main direction so are deflected forward or absorbed fairly easily. So many waves arrive at the loops at the correct angle to join the flow, good so far, next we must consider the frequency they arrive at. If runners arrive at the perfect speed matching the flow, one new runner to fill a gap between two runners already in the group there is the ability to join those running in the circuit. Again all good. If we have some arriving at intervals of less frequency than the frequency of gaps between runners on the track some cannot join those on the track they risk hitting a passing runner breaking the flow so they are pushed back by the looping runners to continue in a different direction (they all run at a constant speed). With runners arriving too frequently some may join but there will be many runners unable to join the group without collisions, risking breaking the loop so some fill a gap while some are pushed to continue forward in a direction outside the loop. Now remember we have many different electron orbitals being manipulated in photosynthesis, 6 carbon, 12 oxygen, 12 hydrogen and another 6 oxygen. But at each point in making the compound (at 6 points) we have 3+3 orbs=6 meeting. In  CO2 we have 1 carbon and 2 oxygen at each point and in H2O 2 hydrogen and 1 oxygen so each 3 orbitals are merged spinning in sync. If both meet to merge at least 2 orbs will always be against the grain and get forced out.   In photosynthesis when these are positioned by the organisms they use the unique "star of David" moment to align and merge them into a 24 kissing ball structure. This looks similar to Newton and Gregors' 13 kissing ball structure but instead of one orb in the middle we have the 12 smaller Hydrogen orbs at every intersection where 2 oxygen and 1 carbon or 2 carbon and one oxygen meet acting as a mediating cog between the three. The unique size of the elements in the compound has the very similar sized 6C and 6O molecules at the outside, the 12H on the inside holding the shape means that 12 of the oxygen molecules are forced or bumped out. There is enough time however to hold the shape for long enough to catch more flazzma (ether) and saturate the orbitals. Once the saturation point is attained the shape becomes stable, the organisms
 orientate the fabric using conscious focus (we know consciousness can move matter by the simple fact we use conscious focus to make matter work for us to hold a phone, a pen, if we are lucky....a lovers hand), the fabric already stretched and now aligned is released as the fabric passes, the elementary orbs having mass decrease the angles in the field intersections, H the most, and they all follow the path of least resistance which brings them all towards each other. The orbs come together, the two larger oxygen molecules in each of the CO2 molecules are aligned and held now by the angles of the TREDDs to face outwards. As the inner 24 elementary orbs merge the outer 12 oxygen molecules get bumped against the flow and due to their size being more uniform than the single carbon their twin loops hold but they are jolted to break free from the pack and are released as 6 O2 molecules. So now in the carbohydrate we have 6 large oxygen, 6 large carbon and 12 small hydrogen orbs spinning perfectly in one overall direction as 3 dimensional cogs. So to compare that with the runners we end up with a shape In the race track where we can have runners crossing each other between 2 sets of tracks keeping a loop going between both. We can't do it with 3 tracks however. If we try it the 3rd means at one point the runners will meet head on passing between where the tracks meet, this jams the flow, it just doesn't work. In 3 dimensions we can have H working as cogs at every intersection between 2O and 1C or 1O and 2C so we can make a 3 dimensional rather than a 2 dimensional loop. With photosynthesis we can have many waves of photons joining the loop arriving at the right frequency within the short "star of David moment". Just like the runners in the tracks in this moment we can add many more waves of energy to saturate as much space as possible in the loop. Those waves that rebound out still travel at the same overall speed but their different frequencies average out with slight adjustments in the congestion to give an overall pattern of frequencies which match the energy in the loops. So in fact in the loop we can have green light also, maximum intensity looping. That is unless we provide light of lesser frequency, red light, which reduces the efficiency and productivity of the plant, if we provide light on the blue end it is extremely intense and stressful for the plant just as it would be for runners running at a brisk pace tightly packed together. The chances of collisions breaking the loop become higher. So plants like sensibly run marathons regulate the flow of movement. Another way to see the importance of synchronicity is when hitting a tennis ball in practice, if someone is practicing using a machine to fire balls and it is throwing one every minute it is an inefficient way to train, if the balls come every second it is too fast to be useful, we must adjust the machine to run at regulated mid speed to be of use. This is what plants do in photosynthesis, they align the frame to maximise the efficiency so some low frequency light and high frequency light is deflected and the law of distribution means that where these waves merge in peaks we will always see a greater proportion of green light than any other. With light at too low a frequency (red light) they don't catch as much energy as possible and so it is inefficient and too high a frequency creates too much stress, causing breaks which need energy for repairs which is also inefficient. Perhaps like a teacher may give little of her time to a student who is lazy and distracts other students and also to a student who comes all the time with basic questions that were covered numerous times in the lecture but they don't listen because they are busy on their phones. The students which pay attention, absorb info and come with valid points the teacher perhaps forgot to mention and needs to clarify are the ones that keep the intelligent loop engaged and become more productive. (A little off the point but our teachers are generally incredibly wonderful, patient, hard working, sweet and generally take much more s#@€& than they deserve so I want to give them their special place in the theory of Everything.) 

The way carbohydrates are used for energy would appear to be a similar but slightly different process. In this process the organism uses a frame to again stretch the fabric and consequently the carbohydrate to such an extent that it's electron orbitals are stretched making the carbon atoms electron orbitals weaker in relation to the hydrogen atoms but now closer in size to the slightly larger oxygen atoms. This allows the 6 aligned and ready O2 molecules to be connected and fused with the carbon atoms breaking the already stretched, stressed and close to breaking carbohydrate bond which releases the carbon dioxide and water molecules, simultaneously releasing some of the torlectrons and/or pressurised flazzma/ether trapped inside to be used in various biological processes. 


PLANTS CAN.....XXXXX?
The time has come to reveal one of the findings that led me to solving the double slit experiment. It is revealed and backed by Tompkins and Bird's 1973 Masterpiece "The Secret Life of Plants" (TSLOP) the truth that has been staring anyone who ever studied photosynthesis is so stunning I am going to drag it out into a long sentence...or two, you and the plants deserves it, you will never get to read this paragraph again for the first time so it warrants special attention. Take a long deep breath, make a cuppa  coffee or pour a glass of fresh water even wine if you have some if you want to make this moment extra special, not that it needs it. Here goes.
 For anyone who has not read TSLOP the book opens with a chapter about an astonishing experiment. Scientists had figured out that plants have a nervous system, different from animals in structure but very similar in principle. Plants relay electric signals through their system using electricity just like we do with our nervous system. However it has been elusive just how plants do it. That is the second revelation I will cover on the topic. To go back to the astonishing experiment...scientists having identified that plants send signals using electricity attached electric sensors to the plants for various tests. One was a test to identify a criminal. Two plants were set in a room, one connected to an electrical detector which was able to display when the plant was excited to different levels. Burning the leaves and plucking it's leaves caused the monitor to show the plant seemed to be experiencing pain of some kind. It's impulses would rise in tempo/speed when inflicted with injury just like we might have a rapid heartbeat when subjected to pain. Not just that but when it feared it was going to be inflicted with pain it also exhibited excitations in it's "heartbeat" just like we would when we expect or anticipate pain and the same when it's buddy was inflicted with pain, it exhibited empathy. It was astounding but what the experimenters did next was both extremely cruel (given what they had just discovered) and jaw droppingly astonishing. People were brought one at a time into the room where the two plants were situated and brought out again. Then one person was instructed to tear up and destroy the plant that was not rigged to the electric sensors. Once the person began the other plant became extremely distressed with phenomenally high readings on the detector. It was as if it was petrified at what was going on. Once the first plant had been ripped to shreds and destroyed completely the person who had done it left the room. The plant's "heartbeat" which had gone "off the scale" returned to relative normal pace. Next people were brought again one by one into the room and the plants "heartbeat" remained relatively constant. However when the person who had torn it's buddy entered the room again the plant went "hysterical" it's heartbeat rose to an incredibly high rate. It recognised the "murderer" and became extremely distressed. 
Two things that this reveals when one applies common sense but which no one to my knowledge has realised before (and are just the tip of the iceberg or the first chamber in the rabbit hole of possibilities that this experiment draws our awareness to) are these. First how the plants nervous system works was totally baffling, the scientists could find no system of nerves like animals have. Secondly the mystery of how the plant was able to recognise the culprit was not understood by the experimenters. 
Are you ready for the truth? The first is this, the nervous system that the plants used to communicate impulses throughout it's biological machine was...water. I don't think I need to explain that any more, most people will get the significance immediately and if not we will have plenty of science communicators already thinking up ways to explain just how profound this is but I will say that fasting with water is known to increase many HUMAN functions. Almost all religions encourage fasting with water as a spiritual activity. It not just cleanses and detoxifies our system it also increases our ability to communicate impulses. If we look at it that way we have our nerve system as our electrical circuitry like our radio and TV using optic fibre for example. But we also have water providing another pathway, so the fact that people paralysed and told they will never walk, or talk again (because they have broken spines perhaps) can suddenly and unexpectedly regain use if their limbs again is seemingly due to water acting as the wifi system for the body. If the central nervous system is out of action we have a backup wifi system O2 They only remained trapped in the belief that they could not regain mobility as long as they believe there is only one system of impulses in the body. In fact there are two (at least). So those who believe in faith healers and miracle workers are not following a delusion. It may be a difficult road but it is not just possible that miracles can happen it is science revealed by the double slit experiment.
Scientists were baffled and remained baffled for the almost 50 years since TSLOP as to how the plant could recognise the culprit. They did figure out that plants respond to specific peoples brainwave frequencies even over great distance but that is not the full picture.  The plant in question did not seem to pickup the persons frequency approaching the room, only when they entered.  It is so simple and logical it is beautiful and you may possibly nèver look at a tree or shrub in the same way again. If anyone wants to try to figure it out for themselves stop reading now and think about it for as long as you want. 

The answer. For anybody whose minds are fresh and on the ball after the section on "photosynthesis" you may have got it. As every cell with chlorophyll is a photo sensitive cell, an optic receptor, it is no stretch of the imagination to realise....plants can see. Every cell transforming light into energy is also communicating what it detects into the system. The plants see but unlike us, not just in one direction they see all around, everywhere a leaf or blade is facing picking up light it is able to see. Whether it is a plane flying above or some ladybirds making love underneath a leaf they can see it all. As was excellently hinted at in one of my favourite films ever James Cameron's beautifully directed work of  collective art "Avatar," plants can also "see" what every other plant is seeing by tuning into the signal. In the film using roots but also on a global scale using that now uncovered biological network, the spacetime fabric. Unlike us like us plants have a 360° visual image but just like us the detail focused on is adjusted by consciousness, with us we adjust the direction and width between our lenses, with plants they adjust the resolution relative to their centre of conscious focus.  How I can be sure is explained in a video relating to the metaphysics which I worked on 7 years before I started working on quantum physics, which is linked later in the paper. The wifi of the Universe has all our thoughts and actions emitted out into the field, the Universe, whether we like it or want to disbelieve it or not picks up the vibration. As Theists say, God (the Universe) knows everything and as prophets have said, nothing happens out of sight of God, everything that was hidden will be revealed...sooner or later. Everything, every vibration that was ever made since the beginning of time is theoretically detectable one way or another sooner or later. As Bob Marley sang "There ain't no hiding place from the father of creation, singing....one love, one heart, let's get together and feel alright....." For Christians, the idea that Jesus healed the blind, the Deaf, lepers and the paralysed and even raised a dead man Lazarus and child, the Roman Centurian's daughter, from the dead suddenly leave the realm of fantasy, fairytale and into the realm of science.

If the soul quantised is at the level of a LUCA then the life of a tree, blade of grass, bee or yeast has some value at the very least just like the animals. Plants who cannot even scream to pull on our emotions. Awareness and consciousness will of course vary but the realisation is that plants are highly sentient, that they can see and communicate with efficiency and distance perhaps to a much much more advanced level than us it seems killing trees is every bit as inhumane and cruel as killing a highly sentient animal like a cow or chicken. Some may say more inhumane, given their potentially much greater intelligence and feelings of empathy, killing a plant may in a sense be comparable to killing a defenceless young baby or even a new born child. It turns out this is consistent with the science that wholefood and raw vegan doctors have been proving for decades. The foods which humans have survived on and thrived on for millennium are those which necessitate little or no harm to any plant. Grains like rice, oats, wheat, maize are generally harvested after the parent plant has withered and died. Even underground plants like potatoes, turmeric, sweet potato etc are generally not harvested until the plant has "gone to seed" and died. There is little or no suffering if done with thought. Fruit would appear to give the plant pleasure when picked and eaten. It may initially seem like this implies we will have to completely rethink what and how we eat but the reality is most of our best loved staples are these foods. Fruit, bread (unfermented), pasta/noodles, rice, nsima/ugali/pap, potatoes, millet, tapioca, cassava, pies, patties etc. With the amount of creative chefs demonstrating their imagination and skills all over the media network they will no doubt have a plethora of new tantalising dishes for those struggling to eat full raw fruit which theoretically seems the best way to go or fully fruit, tuber and seed based. There remains however some sensible reasons to keep the starch based foods in our cupboards and on our plates which almost every vegan/plant based doctor will explain. Physically because they are so "easy" they are delicious, they require very little will power to eat and create very little side effects which makes them attractive. Ecologically, crop diversity and a non over dependence on one crop or type of crop always seems a pragmatic move and the science backs it, with data showing variation helps keep the soil as well as the gut flora healthy and balanced. While many have tried to fool the public with the high fat and meat keto type diets the science and common sense soon reveals our ancestors were not predominantly hunter gatherers, they were predominantly gatherers, perhaps with a primitive form of ad hoc agriculture, the short sightedness and often the lies of the advocates profiting from these businesses has done a lot of harm. These keto type diets certainly combat many diseases and conditions and help people lose a lot of weight fast but they do so by making the body so toxic it is difficult for any nasty organism to survive within our bodies. Unfortunately for humans it also makes it difficult for our own cells to remain healthy and stress free, it shows up sooner with bad breath, dependence on drugs (life hacks as the conmen call them) or later in heart attacks, cancers, rapid weight gain, diabetes depression etc with any divergence from very strict routines and diets. My point is for anybody reading, thinking this will make it impossible to enjoy and feel free about food while aware of the science this is not so. There is a whole world of new foods awaiting. We certainly can't go straight to a full fruit based diet straight away. The agricultural infrastructure wouldn't cope, it may take a while if we go that way. So it seems with 2.7 million highly aware, intelligent trees being slaughtered, billions of animals, plants and insects slaughtered and hundreds of species going extinct EVERY DAY, mainly to meet a growing human population's lust for dead animal flesh and dairy it seems there was a reason that the Theory of Everything was elusive and perhaps revealed to me. Because I give a living voice to the science, while any other scientist who may have realised the simple logic they may have written it with abstract maths and complex terminology making it inaccessible to all but a very elite few and without factoring in living beings. However it is now both highly scientific, full of truths and understanding far beyond what "cold physical science" would have revealed and full of what every living thing in nature has.....feeling. Written at a level that almost every teenager and adult will be able to grasp within a short space of study. Many may grasp it and put the logical steps it points to into action immediately, with passion and energy. Do feel free to wave at the trees next time you are walking, they CAN see you, every green plant IS an optic receptor, it is beyond question (though some will likely desperately try to argue)no doubt trees have been extremely distressed, hurt by and angry with humanity but no doubt they will be overjoyed when they realise we see them at last as we start on the long road of discovery of how we can work together to make the most of this planet to turn it into a shared paradise which it has always had the potential to be. To anyone reading this going, "bloody hippy" I would say it seems the time of ridicule and irresponsibility is soon at an end. Children are magnets for truth, they thrive on it and even if many in current generations have become selfish, disillusioned, worn down and misguided disrespecting and destroying the planet the kids and responsible adults will surely get mobile and active turning this magical planet into the paradise it has the potential to be. Probably while the kids grow to be the healthiest, strongest, most intelligent, well informed, beautiful generation we have seen in a long time.  I am hoping and praying that the physicists who have ignored this breakthrough have been interfered with and deliberately but painfully blinded by  the Universe herself for a greater purpose . (https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_universal_common_ancestor)Corrected from "Plants" to "LUCA" (3rd Oct 2020)
If trees are in fact being spoken for by the LUCA cell "master" mainframe/motherboard/universal Earthbound soul "The Lord" of every living thing, which forms the foundation in every living cell on the planet,  given a voice in the bible then as the bible states, in Isaiah 44:14 LUCA as the Lord would have said "We have put a veil on their eyes so they cannot see and blinded their hearts so they cannot understand."  Perhaps that was until trees and plants were given their voice within this scientific paper. Now, I hope I pray that now that they have been given a voice through me that they will now lift that veil and open the many hearts and minds of scientists who have come across this in the last year. So it can reach every corner, room and place on the planet overnight (which is possible) so we can all get busy to work together as Earthlings to bring this planet back from a road to hell and doom to one of unprecedented hope and possibility. I live in hope and faith as always. 


CHI/QI/KUNDALINI ENERGY
So logically while respiration, the release of energy from carbohydrates is the main source of energy in most biological bodies in human bodies it makes sense that chi/qi energy is both a form of nuclear energy generated within the system and a movement of the flazma by concentrated focus.   This explains hands on healing where the flazma is manipulated, it pushes certain electron orbitals to break loops. This releases energy as photons at intensities which generate sufficient heat to damage and destroy pathogens but not enough to damage or destroy the organisms cells. Faith healing is logically where the afflicted person increases their vibration due to a sense of restored integrity (physical and moral) which stops pathogens from taking or keeping a hold on biological sysems and as shown by the work of the 19th century French engineer Andre Simoneton (77) above a certain frequency disease cannot exist within a body.In physical terms the integrity focuses the bandwidth of time to a narrower and "tighter" range. The effect is in a sense like a bike wobbling erratically by someone trying to learn to cycle and then at a certain focus that wobble, deviation from a central balance is brought into balance reducing the wobble and creating stability/integrity thereby strength/fortification in the cell and collectively the organism.

SURFACE TENSION AND Sonoluminescence.
Surface tension in liquids are caused by these electron orbitals also. The immense suction of the negative energy in the wave's wake passing through the flazzma pulls all the electron orbitals together at the surface creating that tight skin like effect.
When sound waves are passed through water or other fluids at certain volume and frequencies they collapse bubbles and light is emitted along with heat at thousands of degree Celsius [60]. This being where the passing sound vibrations momentarily change the angle of electron orbitals in the fluid breaking the binding pathways between those electron orbitals which cause surface tension. With the breaking of the bond releasing huge amounts of energy as light/heat from these loops in an instant [59]


HEAT AND COLD
Heat and cold are a measure of the amount of energy/pushes and the amount of flazma within a certain space. Heat is increased pressure and increased pushes/energy while cold is less pushes and less pressure of flazma in matter. In living bodies detected as heat by increased energy and/or flazma increasing the amount of friction and "wear and tear" as the spacetime fabric hits biological structures with greater frequency. At high levels ripping at the biological fabric destroying it. Cold is where energy is lessened or removed so the amount and intensity of pushes/energy of photons and the level of flazma are decreased. This leads to an attempt to conserve flazma in biological bodies by closing off cell membranes and by generating more heat by releasing torlectrons from carbohydrates and other substances to keep the amounts of pushes/energy necessary for living processes to continue.
 In elementary molecules it is an effect both of how many electrons are caught looping within orbitals, how charged they are, due to the properties of the loop and how much flazma is compressed within these electron orbitals. The more energy and photons absorbed the greater the amount and intensity of pushes as heat, this is common sense, the more light absorbed the hotter they get. The more energy looping inside electron orbitals the more flazma is expelled (and pulled in) at each magnetic moment and the more magnetic moments collide repelling vortexes of energy as torlectrons detected as electrons in orbitals so heat expands compounds and elements because there are more pushes with more power and there is a greater amount of flazma being expelled per volume...common sense...once one understands the fabric. Also conversely when there is less energy and less flazma the materials pass a balanced state which by the law of equilibrium they will try to maintain. So with less energy in electron orbitals they will tend to expell less flazma and have less flazma to expel so they try to attract more flazma in to maintain the point of balance/equilibrium. This is why my friend Ray's tongue got stuck to the freezer door when he didn't believe us that it would. With the very cold ice trying to pull in more flazma to find the perfect state of equilibrium it pulled flazma from the water in the saliva on his tongue which then pulled lots of flazma out very fast from water surrounding cells on his tongue and being so tightly woven by the tongue cell tissue and the surface "skin" of the saliva he had to wait a while until we stopped, tickling him (gently) and laughing and began pouring warm water on his tongue to add more energy, increase the amount of flazma and free enough molecules to allow him be released.
Also with less energy the amount of magnetic moments are less often with less energy so the colder material becomes the more compact it becomes. At very low temperatures the material becomes so compact that it's electron orbitals touch, share loops and become solid. Above a certain temperature the material has enough magnetic moments (pushes) and flazzma to stretch and break loops from each other into a liquid state. We still usually have surface tension however holding the liquid together...until...there is enough energy and flazma to push the molecules out of the surface "skin" and free as gas. This explains the age old puzzle of why water produces water vapour at both very cold and very hot temperatures. Starting with a gas the water molecules begin to lose energy, they push with less energy until at a certain point they can momentarily clump together in positive and negative magnetic moments and continue repeating this until they clump into larger droplets at which point they reach a critical mass. At this point the angles of the fabric (gravity) pulls them down with more force than the upwards push of the collective magnetic moments can and water falls (as rain, sleet, hail). Water vapour happens for two main reasons both connected with angles of the surface. At high temperatures water molecules are bouncing with so much energy producing many magnetic moments and/or so much pressurised flazzma that the electron orbitals are pushed to and fro further and further apart until they eventually break from the pack which keeps the electron orbitals linked to form the "skin" at the surface. The fabric of spacetime is also  stretched breaking the shared electron orbitals in water and other liquid molecules away from the main group. Similar in a sense to how an Olympic sprint may have intense pent up energy in a group of sprinters at the beginning of a race and with so much energy and superhuman expectations pushing against every runners urge to remain supercool one of them momentarily can't control all the many variables, something snaps and s/he "bolts" out of the cool and out of the race (liquid) and must wait and cool down to re-enter at another point (as cool as ever...hopefully!). With strong sunlight also some photons may arrive with such energy and perhaps against the direction of the torlectron in the orbital that they break the loop momentarily to force the torlectron to bounce off the adjoining molecules rather than stay merged and hereby "pop" a molecule out of the pack. 

 At the other end of the cool at much cooler liquid temperatures one may compare it to where the surface tension now becomes so compact and tight that a molecule is squeezed out as electron orbitals become squeezed together, the angles in the fabric become sharper and break the perfect loop holding them. One may perhaps compare it in an abstract way to how a finger and a thumb may apply energy on each side of a slippery seed and it will be squeezed to where the angles holding it become too acute at one end, the bottom (in the hand the angle between the two digits, in electron orbitals the angle between all touching molecules sqeezing one up and out) so the seed or molecule zips out into the air. We can understand this very clearly with water as the sun heats up the surface of lakes and oceans etc. It seems to me, the logic suggests that molecules snap and are released in great amounts and "bounce" up and away from the surface. As the water becomes icy cold the angles at the surface also squeeze water molecules together until the pressure in the flazma is so great and/or the angle so acute one molecule and collectively many pop out. Another good way to visualise it is a line of people at the front of a crowd linking arms. With more energy/pushes from behind the front line becomes stretched one person loses grip and is forced out and another instantly replaces him/her from the pack to try and hold the pack. Conversely with less energy/pushes against the front the pack can be squeezed tighter, now there is not as much space to allow the same number of people linking arms at the front line and some get squeezed so tight one gets forced out from the front also. 

  So logically while respiration, the release of energy from carbohydrates is the main source of energy in most biological bodies in human bodies it makes sense that chi/qi energy is both a form of nuclear energy generated within the system and a movement of the flazma by concentrated focus.   This explains hands on healing where the flazma is manipulated, it pushes certain electron orbitals to break loops. This releases energy as photons at intensities which generate sufficient heat to damage and destroy pathogens but not enough to damage or destroy the organisms cells. Faith healing is logically where the afflicted person increases their vibration due to a sense of restored integrity (physical and moral) which stops pathogens from taking or keeping a hold on biological sysems and as shown by the work of the 19th century French engineer Andre Simoneton (77) above a certain frequency disease cannot exist within a body. In physical terms the integrity focuses the bandwidth of time to a narrower and "tighter" range. The effect is in a sense like a bike wobbling erratically by someone trying to learn to cycle and then at a certain focus that wobble, deviation from a central balance is brought into balance reducing the wobble.  It is of course logical that if one doesn't believe one can ride a bike or is so nervous and afraid of falling that one will not exert enough energy to move the bike with enough focus to achieve a balanced forward motion so s/he will never learn to ride a bike. Similarly with healing there must be belief/faith in order to bring the consciousness to a state of balanced focus and be healed. 

SUPERFLUIDITY
With superfluidity [65] we have gas or other bosons condensed to extremely low temperatures acting as liquids but with zero viscosity, ie. they dont form collective shapes like droplets or pools each molecule moves independently. Which means their electron orbitals are not touching so each molecule is in a sense moving freely. When they appear to defy gravity by flowing upwards along the sides of containers they are not in fact defying gravity. They are using "lateral gravity". Water attempts to use lateral gravity to climb up the sides of containers also but because of their electron orbitals touching they are held together and cannot break free to climb. How can they climb? Using spring time theory we see that gravity is not a force as such it is a mechanism of the field. This forces torlectrons in orbitals along the path of least resistance which is where the angles between TREDDs is the smallest. This is usually on the surface of large objects like planets. However any solid object has millions/billions/trillions of atoms clumped together so their surface also pulls in TREDDs. With superfluidity what is happening is that with no surface tension the atoms in the superfluid are able to move independently along the paths where the connecting TREDDs angles are smallest. This is usually on the surface of the large celestial objects but any object also pulls in the TREDDs to smaller angles. So sometimes they are at ground level but sometimes they are perpendicular or at angles greater or less than 90' to ground level if the object is dense enough. In superfluidity when the object is near or touching the ground the space between quantum strands is affected by both plus the pull of the density of the supercooled superfluid. The atoms then move not necessarily towards the ground but to where the TREDDs connecting angles are least. So this can be up along sides. The atoms of the superfluid itself causing a pull on the field narrowing the angle on connections forcing atoms upwards along surfaces. When the density of the superfluid has been equalised between two separate containers the angle of connections in the field are equalised so there is no more a mechanism for movement. Once the angles between TREDDs has been equalised the superfluid no longer moves as it is now at the point of least resistance. 

FUN SUPERFLUIDITY/LATERAL GRAVITY EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
imagine we have a play den full of hyperactive toddlers all in great shape and full of energy after eating their fill of super ripe mangoes. They are great climbers and can climb ladders easily but not ropes so are still a bit afraid to climb up ropes. There is a section in the play den with 2 rooms whose walls are made of strong elastic netting. one room is in the middle of the bigger room so the kids enter the inner room via a hole in the floor. In order to get into the larger room they must climb over the walls. But there's a problem. The distance between the elastic strands is variable. The structure holding the elastic netting is also variable, it consists of 4 vertical columns connected by 4 horizontal columns at the top in a cube shape. The vertical columns have springs inside so with pressure exerted on them they become compacted and the distance between the elastic strands of the netting on the 4 walls' netting is shortened. Usually the toddlers will climb along the floor as they can reach the strands but with the columns at full height the distance between the horizontal lines of the elastic in the wall is beyond their reach so they wont climb and remain on the floor. Sometimes some kids are very anxious and when they see another kid try to climb the walls even when they can reach horizontal strands they panic thinking their little climbing buddys will lose grip and fall and so they hold onto any who try to climb to protect them (surface tension). Not today, today these toddlers are super cool, super confident and full of energy. Not least because their big brothers and sisters are with them. The bigger kids climb up onto the top of the cube their mass/weight means the vertical columns are forced down on the springs ( symbolising lateral gravity, the gravity caused by the sides of cups or tubes having narrower angles due to their denstity being greater than the surrounding field). Now the horizontal lines are brought closer together, these kids can reach the horizontal lines and so they do what super cool kids do, they go for maximum fun and nobody is holding anyone back. They climb up and over the walls and into the other room to play also. After a while due to the law of equilibrium they are fairly equally distributed playing in both rooms. 

The Bose Einstein Condensate is where bosons are cooled so low (slowed down so slow) that we can actually see their movement reveal the waves in the flazzma as they move through the field. 


THE SPEED OF LIGHT
Using Spring Time Theory we can explain why the speed of light [37] is constant and why so even with change of frequency. Using the spring mechanism all matter affects the quantum field the spring/time field. If light is traveling towards us through the spring like quantum field our movement affects the spring mechanism, if we are moving towards it we compress the spring mechanism, if we are moving away we stretch the spring mechanism, so the path distance of light through the springs remains constant. Altogether the same path length. This is how I realised there was flazzma, initially I thought it was some kind of kinetic energy moving through some kind of spring type mechanism. As matter is made of vibrations passing through the field they couldn't of themselves explain the constant speed of light. If pure vibrations were travelling towards or away from light as ripples then the speed would be different, light would in such a case reach an object faster when combined with the vibrations/objects' approaching speed, if it is travelling away then light should hit the vibrations/object with decreased speed. So for example if we are the object I realised there must be something pushing against and slowing down light coming towards us and conversely something pulling it faster towards us as we move away from light. So I realised there must be a medium through which light travels inside the field. Upon study I learned that ancient philosophers hypothesized an ether in the universe a concept that gained popularity again with the discovery of the wave nature of light but this was ruled as no longer possible given The Michelson and Morley experiments, Einstein's laws of relativity and the belief in the particle nature of light. Already knowing that the particle existed fixed in the field not as a separate moving entity I realised there must be a medium INSIDE the field lattice causing a build up of pressure in the medium and subsequent slowing down of light as we travel towards it and the opposite pull on the medium causing negative pressure as we move away creating a vacuum type effect pulling light faster towards us. These 2 effects combined with the objects travelling speed maintaining the constant speed of light. 
Although recorded time slows down nearer large objects the speed of light remains constant....why? Consider it like this. Two vehicles are moving at a fixed speed along two parallel paths. One vehicle comes to a roundabout (curvature) but passes through without slowing down the other remains travelling straight so while the speed remains constant the vehicle passing through curvature loses time because its path has been made longer "stretched". Once it comes back onto a straight road the speed is the same but it has lost time. If we send an object at speed past a water vortex it will be drawn in. If it is moving fast enough its path will be changed slightly but will become straight again as it comes out of the pull of the vortex. Other objects slow enough will be drawn in and get caught in a loop spiraling in. Another example: If light is traveling towards us through the quantum field our movement affects the spring function as we have "mass" or "resistance" we affect the quantum field causing "drag" if we are moving towards it we compress the spring function whereas if we are moving away we stretch the spring function. So the path distance of light THROUGH the springs remains constant. When we swim against an oncoming wave in the ocean our swim strokes may be consistent, exerting consistent forward momentum but our speed is slowed down as the pressure in the water which manifests the wave slows us down. Conversely if we are swimming at a beach with a significant degree of negative pressure causing a strong undertow or undercurrent the negative pressure of the recoiling wave pulls us out towards sea, if we are swimming sufficiently fast enough it will still slow us down to a speed much slower than if we were in still waters due to the drag or negative pressure that it exerts.

FUN SPEED OF LIGHT EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
To illustrate imagine we have 2 coiled hosepipes, they are empty to begin with, we turn the water on at full power at the same time, now if one hosepipe is taken and we run to the other end of a field before it comes out of the nozzle it will come out of the nozzle on the second hosepipe at exactly the same time regardless of whether it is still sitting coiled beside the tap or halfway across the field. Regarding light, if we have mass we exert compression on the quantum field while we are traveling towards the light source just like if we stand at the midfield line holding the nozzle of the hosepipe and run with it towards the tap it is connected to so the distance is less as the spring function is compacted but the water or in the space time fabric the light inside the pipes still travels the full length of the pipes. If we are travelling or running away from the light or water source we cause an expansion as the spring function is stretched so either way the path distance is the same. The detected force will be the same at either nozzle on arrival.  While it may seem like I am making a point that is contrary to the standard notion of the speed of light because the water leaving the  end of the hose is arriving at different distances from the source/tap let me clarify.  The tap in the example would not be stationary and the amount of curl or straightness of the pipe represents the amount of mass being accelerated towards the destination. The less acceleration of the mass the less curl in the hose and the further away in space the source and the end would be. On the other hand if the source is being accelerated towards the destination through space the spacetime fabric would be compacted similar to how the hose would be compacted.
The reason why light speed remains constant while there is curvature or not could be visualised again by using the water hosepipe analogy. If a hosepipe is elastic in nature then as it is being stretched its core will contract in diameter but if a vibration like a sound wave is passed through the water it will travel forward at the same speed regardless of the width of the hosepipe's core diameter but as the width contracts that wave will lose energy.


QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND TELEPORTATION  (added 25 July 2019Amended to update and amalgamate the section on teleportation with QE on 31 July 2020)
Time dimensions are key to understanding quantum entanglement [41]. When we seem to force the "particles" to align with the direction of the measurement we are not actually affecting the spin what we are doing is focusing on one instance in time. So while the energy passing through the fabric is moving wavelike in many different directions (paths) when we focus on one measurement we focus on the time "bandwidth" that gives exactly the correlation between the two "particles" . It is not that any information is passing between the " particles " to influence each other, the pathways have been set already with the entanglement, the time bandwidth we focus on determines which part of the wave we see. Just like a wave on water if the point of disturbance is a drop (in the quantum realm entanglement) the wave if measured at any two points at equal distance from the centre will show a relational movement if the conscious observers look at exactly the same orientation or "moment" in time, in QE it is the conscious observers who are communicating conscious information. This is a flat surface example but entangled "particle" are of course 3 dimensional in both time and space. To further illustrate the point imagine a satellite orbits the Earth changing its path by a slight degree every orbit. At one time its orbit will be North to south traveling NESWNESWNE....etc. if we view it from the direction of the sun it appears clockwise. If the orbit of the satellite then gradually moves down facing us eventually it will be orbiting west to east as it aligns to the equator and anticlockwise as it then aligns to the poles again and east to west as it aligns to the equator next time...and so forth. If we focus on only every second orbit that is aligned to the equator and only record that orbit on film it will appear like the satellite is only orbiting east to west at the equator when the clips are put together and the film is played back (this is not describing the orbits or spin (twist) of "particles" it is an illustration to convey the theory that we only detect events happening within specific segments of time and miss much of all that is going on in other segments ). When physicists seem to force a "particle" to align to a direction of spin they are only forcing the focus to that point in time which corresponds to that specific spin. Each twist at each moment in time will always have a twist relational to all other RIKs in the field when measured from the point of entanglement, the origin of the wave. 
It is a similar effect being observed in quantum entanglement as we have to reduce the time range to see the "particle". We know that brainwaves (consciousness) [42] have frequency ranging through gamma, alpha, beta, theta, delta and when scientists focus on the same parameters their consciousness gets tuned to the same frequency of time similar to radios being tuned to unique radio stations and the orbits or orbitals observed around "particles"  and the detected "spin"(twist) reflect only those which align to the measurement parameters focused on and these are relational in both locations no matter how far apart in space they are moved. This is NOT saying that the experimenters consciousness affects matter in quantum entanglement, it is saying which frequency or bandwidth of time they focus on determines what result they will get.
To understand quantum entanglement it is probably best to visualise the points in the field as cogs. When one RIK (a) is twisted clockwise by an energy wave passing along an x axis all the connected RIKs on the y and z axes are pulled and twisted both clockwise and anticlockwise by (a)'s twist (matter and it's opposite helicity in equal in number). This twist spreads out to every connected RIK that the wave passes through. So in quantum entanglement when the two observers view the "particles" they are focusing on a specific time bandwidth and seeing a corresponding twist relative to each other. If we were to cover a globe´s surface with cogs fitting perfectly snug to each other as one cog turns it will turn every other cog on the globe one way or the other and each cog turn will always be relational to all others when measured from the source of the turn in this case the globe central core point. Another way to view quantum entanglement is if we view a 2 dimensional comparison as a "slice" or line of latitude  of a  spherical wave. To illustrate it we can compare it to a clock face, if the source of the wave travels out equally in every direction from the centre of the clock face then any two points will be relational when measured. If the wave travels out and we measure it from a central point then if we have digits going around clockwise numbered 12, 01,02,03..........10,11 ending back at 12 again. Now if we measure the wave from the mid point, being the vertical line dividing the left and right sides of the clock, then if we focus on the 1 in 12 then it's relational partner will be the 2 in 12, in the field with an opposite twist (spin) like two cogs beside each other. If we look at the 1 in 10 when we look for it's relational entangled partner it will be at the 2 in 02. If we look at the left 1 in 11 it's relational opposite twisting partner will be the 1 in 01 etc.
The  fact is that when Bell's theorem states that  "Consequently, the only way that hidden variables could explain the predictions of quantum physics is if they are "nonlocal" this is simply not true, one local hidden variable is the state of phase a wave is in when detected,   Another of the hidden variables is the energy levels and physical size of electron orbitals in elements and compounds which vary dependent on the location and the amount of stretch in the fabric. The reality is the consciousness of the  observers are influencing the results detected, they are not necessarily affecting the matter itself to any great degree but when they take that measurement it affects whether a wave will be detected in or out of phase. Where they take that measurement will dictate when energy levels fluctuate and to what degree they do so. Up until now most quantum measurements have been carried out on the surface of planet Earth but we will see vastly different energy levels, stability levels and radiation levels in elements and particles when measured in zones with different gravitational strengths. There is locality in the consciousness of all observers of reality which seems to be instant regardless of the limitations of space and time. That is, all observers focused on the same dynamics/conscious wavelengths are connected in thought/consciousness which transcends space. Thoughts travel faster than light. It appears it travels instantly regardless of the limitations of physical space. Consciousness is local at any two or more places in the universe when these conscious beings are aligned in focus.  I came across a lecture by Ron Garret at google (on 1st August 2020) where he shows that the mathematical equation for quantum entanglement is exactly the same as the equation for measurement. This is exactly what I had been saying for almost a year, that it is the conscious act of measuring that focuses the time bandwidth and gives the correlation between the two parts of the wave, one of many possible specific viewpoints narrowed down to one upon measurement. The lecture is on https://youtu.be/dEaecUuEqfc and the essential point with the mathematical formulae  hit on the head between around 35 to 39 minutes in the video. 

The assumption that there is nothing linking entangled particles across "empty space" is a mistake. STT shows that all parts of the universe are linked by the field. So when physicists use entangled particles to teleport information from one location to another the dynamics of both are affected by BOTH time and space. Looking at Anton Zeilinger's teams work teleporting photons between different Canary islands [67] when the second photon is brought in to affect one of the original entangled photons the wave that the added photon is representative of also travels out and affects the second entangled particle in the distant location. When we tune into the time bandwidth of that added photon we also tune into the same time bandwidth on the distant island and we detect the same wave but in effect it is detected as a separate photon. However because the photon added at the first location is also determined by the laws of entanglement it's corresponding partner detected at the distant location must have the exact relative opposite properties of spin dependant on direction and angle, so when detected as affecting the original photon at the distant location the interaction will be the reverse of the first interaction bringing the final wave at the second location to be exactly the same as the state of the second photon added at the first location, in a sense like two double negatives applied across space from one location to another. Making it appear like the particle has teleported but in fact it is only the energy that has affected the field particles/RIKs because like all matter and light that's all they are...energy. The time bandwidth is also affected so while the focus is on the bandwidth of time affecting the new "teleported" particle detected at it's wave peak at the distant location the wave at the first location is always at it's trough within the same time bandwidth so is never detected although it is always there.  While spooky action at a distance will work instantly regardless of distance teleportation is limited by C. This is theoretically testable by running the experiment using a computer set in the Earths orbit or on the moon perhaps using the technology applied by Chinese physicists doing teleportation into space [38]. We will surely find that measuring for entanglement gives the expected results instantly regardless of time but for example teleporting a photon from the location on the Canary islands to the moon will need time for the added photon wave to arrive and change the original entangled photon because the wave can only travel at the speed of light.  So in effect it is not true teleportation as such it is more like taking the vibration made at one location and reproducing it in another. So theoretically it would not be possible to teleport living beings as there are so many vibrations happening within a living organism with moving parts it would simply be impossible. It would be infinitely more difficult than trying to swim from one shore of a river to a point directly facing your position on the opposite shore through intense white water rapids. What would be possible though in theory has two possibilities. The vibrations of matter of simple non living structures which usually travel out undetected in all directions in 3 ,dimensional time can be "caught", giving the theoretical explanation as to why it was possible for Jesus to multiply the loaves and fishes.   The reason Jesus was able to multiply the loaves and fishes was because while the "particles are the central location of the vortices they twist all connecting TREDDs and RIKs like cogs in a clock but with a slight loss in energy to the TREDDs the connecting RIKs do not twist quite far enough to create vortices in the neighbouring RIKs and they dissipate out through the fabric. However while between his hands he was directing ether/flazzma as qui energy put from my hands as qui practitioners do. The pressure from the outwards flow added to the twist of the RIKs just enough to push the ether in them into full vortices also. So in a matter of moments all the ripples in the field rather than spread out to eventually dissipate they increased with the pressure of the ether he was channelling through his hands and became vortices to become real substance. A gazillion RIKs turned into what we traditionally perceive as particles. The energy was stored and able to be consumed as fuel and satisfied the appetites/energy requirements of the crowd.  Because the bread and flesh was not living the majority of the vibrations could be held but any living organisms within the tissue like bacteria would not be reproduced. The difference would be so insignificant it would have no effect on the overall taste or texture just as people having private conversations at a rock concert would not be reproduced in any live sound recording of that concert. The added bonus for non violent people is  the knowledge that he would not have been giving anyone "unclean food" so he would not have been in breach of any possible kosher regulations stipulated within the Torah nor breaking the laws of Karma, 
 If anyone is still wondering "but how? Is this really possible?" Yes it is, imagine you have a wave coming towards you on the surface of water, if you put an object say a pen or a stick into the water and push against the incoming wave you can create mini whirlpools where the wave passes the pen/stick, in the field when you focus through meditation and gathering qi (ether/flazzma concentrated into streams) and you push that ether/flazzma or apply pressure to the ether/flazzma in the RIKs (which up until that moment emanate out from the central vortex like echoes or almost like cogs in a clock do...almost but not quite... just losing a slight bit of energy to the TREDDs so not quite spinning in vortexes with their own momentum to sustain them)  are now suddenly pushed with very little pressure beyond the golden ratio  1/137.035999 and they become real vortexes or particles in their own right and sustained by their own momentum. In practical terms for food they are storehouse of energy. Theoretically this can be applied to any material say water, wine, even gold or diamonds but if everyone could multiply food wine and water for free why would there be much if any need for gold or diamonds as monetary currency, we can however have them or other rare commodities like rare Earth metals for devices unless there is some technical reason why some elements above a certain weight or shape cannot be reproduced due to problems with symmetry or density .... perhaps. Time will tell. I am adding this (Feb 16 2021) as I move my focus from constantly trying to get people to listen to me to now meditating and actually prove it again. I have been engrossed in completing and promoting the Theory so my meditation has been ongoing but not as intensive so now that I have been able to explain the mechanics I am reverting back to meditation, focusing on the practical demonstration. However if this does go viral there are many more qi practitioners around the world well experienced and practiced in meditation and energy channelling who should be able to apply the Theory to their disciplines and multiply food, water, wine, mushrooms much faster than I can at present, I am exhausted and my focus is frazzled to be honest it may take me a while...maybe not but maybe. Dynamo Jack for example [75] and many Buddhist monks and faith healers who meditate intensely, some for days even weeks at a time should be able to do it once they understand the science and can apply it with faith. It will work if one is very focused and holds the item bread/fish/avocado/wine etc between the two hands then apply conscious pressure to increase the intensity of the current out of both hands. 



What is also theoretically possible using this reality is that the patterns of vibration could be recreated in a sense like taking a recording of music and reproducing it's patterns in another place by playback on amplified gadgets like CD or mp3 players or by reproducing the individual vibrations and reproducing them in different ways similar to electronic keyboards reproducing vibrations similar to acoustic instruments. This also would be extremely difficult and such technology would likely take centuries to develop but theoretically it is very possible. 

  For anyone wanting to feel the affects of the ether/flazzma channelling through your hands simply hold them opposite as if holding an imaginary football between your two hands. Then push the 2 hands closer together as if squeezing a ball, some people find it helpful to rub their hands together energetically to build up movement in the ether/flazzma. One can actually feel the pressure in the ether/flazzma cause resistance in both hands. The trick is to do it very, very gently,  if one pushes too hard the focus on the moment is lost, to gather and channel ether/flazzma as qi or chi one must meditate and bring ones focus to a very calm place so one can not get distracted by imaginings but rather experience all that is happening in the real now. While doing this one can feel the ether/flazzma cause vibrations within the hands themselves as ether is forced past the "particles" that make up our bodies. This is why we can heal with hands by manipulating or channelling ether/flazzma. With concentrated focus we can gather a phenomenal amount of ether/flazzma coupled with the speed we move through the lattice means that in essence we are sending phenomenal heat as photon waves towards any illnesses but in such small amounts that they are not harmful to human cells but extremely harmful to foreign cells. Hence why cataracts, blood clots, parasites etc can be healed with focused applied energy. In a sense we can wash away quantum dirt by channelling ether/flazzma like power jets of water to dislodge the dirt. This also explains why faith/belief which comes through understanding is vital to the success of using qi as a healing medium. The two agents, the sick person and the healer must work together. Say for example someone has a bit of dirt stuck to their skin and another has a power hose and tries to aim it at the dirt, if the person with the dirt constantly moves the jet never stays at the spot long enough to dislodge it. The person with the dirt must stay still and allow the person controlling the jet aim it directly at the spot to dislodge it, they must also hold their limbs rigid to a degree, if they hold them limp then the jet of water will not hit with enough force to dislodge the dirt. 

FUN QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT AND TELEPORTATION  EXAMPLE FOR ALL AGES
If we have a group of toy electric boats in the very centre of a large round lake all pointing towards the edge of the lake. Each boat has 3 flashing lights red, blue and yellow and each light flashes for one second then off for half a second then the next colour. These are synchronised to flash at exactly the same time in the same sequence. Then all are driven by their controllers at equal speed towards the shore. One would expect that any two observers would see exactly the same colour flash if they look at exactly the same time. If they shout across to one another "what colour is your boat flashing now?" The chances that the colours are the same are probabilistic, that is they are likely to be flashing different colours depending on how far away the observers are because sound travels slower than light so by the time the second observer hears the question the colour is not certain to be the same colour it may be any of the three depending on the distance. But if any two observers have a mobile phone and are talking while watching every time and they ask each other what colour is flashing now by saying "now!" Then every time one says "Now!" The other observer responds with the exact same colour as the first observer sees all the time because the speed of the phone signal is virtually instant. Or if they synchronise their watches to the second and they agree to write down the colour that flashes at given times say every 20 seconds. Then when they compare notes they will always see the same colour flashed in both boats regardless of what subsequent route the boats take on their journey. In quantum entanglement what puzzled physicists for so long was they could not understand how the boats could show the same signal when it took time to send a signal between the boats. The answer was the boats were never sending any signals they were just doing what they were set up to do, it was the humans who were sending the signals using thought. The physicists were using consciousness in the experiment but without realising/or not believing that consciousness would affect the result so not counting it as a factor. In this analogy the speed of sound is demonstrating the speed of light in the experiment and the speed of the mobile phone signal is demonstrating the speed of thought and/or the synchronisation of thought. In other words when two observers focus on exactly the same instances of time they get exactly the same results.Regarding teleportation to illustrate the lights flashing on the boats we can compare adding the second particle to the original entangled photon as if we sent a remote control signal to the first boat and changed the sequence.of the lights, however because that signal is three dimensional it also spreads out, hits and affects the sequence of the lights on all the other boats so the sequence timings are all changed but still maintaining the preset sequence order which will be perfectly in or out of sync always consistent with the original settings and start of movement in time. 
An interesting twist of teleportation is that in theory in future we could perhaps use torlectrons to make some relatively simple compounds like sugars, proteins and starches. So if we run out of flour and jam/jelly as we fly through space in a spaceship someday and we get the munchies we can get some energy from the light of a star we are passing, turn on the teleport machine, put in some numbers which correspond to the recipe for a sweet pancake mix (similar to how we put some numbers into a computer and it makes a copy of a film for us to watch) make some delicious sweet mix and make pancakes from nothing but numbers and the light just as we create photons using machines. Whether we can ever truly teleport our consciousness to a distant location is a big question which my evidence says we cannot, If it turns out in future that we can get around the problem of moving parts in living bodies then  we may transport a body but whether it would be my soul in that body is very unlikely and as the wise physicist John Clauser whose failure to understand quantum mechanics led to the successful testing of Bell's theorem says " I wouldn't step into that machine!" [67]  not me either. 

TEST OR THOUGHT EXPERIMENT FOR QUANTUM ENTANGLEMENT TIME BANDWIDTH THEORY (Added 29 July 2019 removed and reinserted on 30 July 2019)
To test this theory of quantum entanglement one possibility may be to have two or more observations at each location, three is probably a good number. These would be performed at exactly the same time by one team for each orientation but with each observer observing the action measured against a different orientation. Each team of observers aware of their distant partners orientation but unaware of the other two teams of observers selected orientation. The results should see each team have corresponding spin and orientation along its selected orientation for the entangled "particles" yet each result for each team would be different than the other two. Although recorded at the same time as we know it each team would be witnessing the "particles" act in different bandwidths of the time dimensions: The bandwidth that correspond to the measurements they are focusing on. I'm not sure how this could be setup but the theory is robust logic and like many thought experiments from the past which were considered impossible at the time this too may become possible as technology advances.
GRAVITATIONAL WAVES (Added 21st Aug)
Gravitational waves are the actual ripple of the space time fabric being stretched just as any fabric structure like spider webs for example send ripples from disturbances. Whether it is binary pulsars [43] tugging at each other or as a star becomes a supernova before accelerating into a black body. The spin accelerates so fast it pulls in the space time fabric faster than the speed of light so light can no longer travel out. The supernova already known about impacting inwards scattering increased light out in all directions and shaking the space time fabric causing the ripples to also travel out across the field in every direction. The waves being ripples of vibration of the fabric itself travel faster than the light which travels through it. Or it may be where a highly combustible object arriving at the star impacts or explodes at a critical angle to the spin causing it to either speed up or slow down. Explaining some fast radio bursts where the incoming object knocks out phenomenal amounts of trapped light in an instant but in the same instant speeds up the star's spin closer to the speed of light with the more acute angles trapping all remaining light in a black body.  For quasars I predict that the jets of light coming out from it's central black body are actually not coming out of the black body itself but it is the space time fabric being spun at phenomenally fast speeds causing the fabric to twist into creases, compact lines along the axis of the spin creating intense frictional vibration as the RIKs in these strands of space time are twisted and banged together in linear strands due to the drag of the spin, these generating light where the RIKs in the field are compressed together and knock against each other with incredible energies creating energy waves. This may eventually be verified by analysing the light from quasars "jets" of light which I predict to be different in nature than those from inside stars, it is not a release of light, electrons and matter as such it is the creation of new waves of photons created by this phenomenal amount of kinetic energy. So according to STT this light is not as a result of nuclear reactions nor light expelled from the quasar itself but rather light emitted by kinetic energy creating photon waves as RIKs in the field knock against each other and the resulting waves spreading out from these interacting strands of spacetime. After finding more information I have shifted my view of quasars and this is what I believe is more likely, I leave the previous section until I am absolutely sure, I am probably 99% certain the new finding is true but I still have some doubts. Quasars like pulsars seem to have have been misunderstood. The intense radio jets coming from quasars is more likely because the black body at the centre has grown so large it has gathered such a large accretion disc around itself and heated it up with kinetic energy. It has also drawn in all the stars and black bodies in nearer, compacted all the interstellar gases and other debris into tighter spaces in the fabric. This means that very little of the galaxies light can exit through the equator of the galaxy and the light that does escapes north and south of the black body in the centre. I am not convinced by the explanation we have of pulsars. The information I have as I understand it doesn't add up. Here is my interpretation of the data.
The interpretation of pulsars as acting like lighouses has also been misunderstood and when one considers basic common sense it is easy to understand why it is nonsensical. The idea that some pulsars rotate at phenomenal speed almost nearing the speed of light is correct. This is around an axis but the idea that this axis wobbles and that is why we see jets emanate from the magnetic pole does not add up to basic physics. The fact that these stars are believed to be the smoothest objects in the universe gives them no reason to wobble. For a wobble to happen like for example in our Earth (that happens slowly over thousands of years) there must be an imbalance in the object, with the Earth it is an imbalance in the tectonic plates and their weight relative to the core. In a pulsar there is no imbalance. What I believe is happening is that the star is going micro nova pulsating and emitting energy due to alternating space expansion and contraction. The evidence from the double slit experiment shows that energy is created and these pulsars logically would be so tight that the energy does not get a chance to build up for long like in a normal white hole/star and the energy is held only for a moment as the matter contracts rapidly into space contraction.  The tight knitted neutron shell holds so tight that as the black body core pushes with every new wave of energy it simultaneously pulls with gravity so the energy can only be held for a tiny instant. As the neutrons are momentarily stretched (in a sense held tight like riot police linking arms suppressing a crowd) then their shared vacuum energy keeping them together pulls back (like riot police strengthening their links and pushing back against a growing crowd) and forces the excess energy out as the flashes we detect, not from a pole but from the entire star. Very similar virtually identical to the dynamics of space contraction that causes atomic clocks to use energy to record time. The idea that pulsars slow down eventually over time looks completely opposite to what the new physics of energy creation dictate. The opposite is likely true, they are likely to grow in the frequency of flashes over trillions of years and many likely have done so. In future we may be able to analyse them, detect some increase in speed and use their mass, region and acceleration to work back and figure out a closer estimate to how old the Universe really is, at least our part of it. No doubt trillions rather than billions of years.
Most fast radio bursts logically would be nova or pulsar type events from much larger black bodies. As the black body grows in mass the angles in the lattice at the event horizon become less acute.   So when energy escapes it is in the radio wave rather than the gamma ray range. The larger the object is the lower the vibration and lower in pitch it's emissions are likely to be.  Therefore the longer the wavelength. Sound is no different than light in essence until it is propagated in a medium and produces different sensory responses. This is because both light and sound in the spacetime fabric are simply ripples through the fabric detected at specific and distinct frequencies. 

Hawking radiation is incorrect, black holes cannot and do not exist.  First of all assertions by people thinking that the temperature inside a hypothesised black hole is much colder than the surrounding universe is emphatically wrong.  Nothing could be further from the truth, black bodies which are in fact the ultimate thermal black bodies are the hottest, densest places in the universe.  As pairs of particles are different representations of the same wave and all parts of any wave producing particles with mass will be drawn into a black body once they cross into just before the event horizon for matter which I guess is 137 times further out from the centre than the event horizon for light. While matter can be propelled to near the speed of light this is only with massive amounts of energy pushing it temporarily at that speed.  The only thing that can escape from a black body event horizon is kinetic energy in the form of ripples detected as neutrinos on small scales, axon ripples which so far  remain undetectable and gravitational waves on large scales. Light can avoid total consumption and continue moving forward as long as it is just outside the event horizon because strictly speaking light is not slowed down or pulled by gravity only it's path is affected and pulled in by gravity while objects with mass are slowed down and pulled inwards by gravity because they incorporate more than one thread of spacetime and move along the path of least resistance. The path of least resistance is where the angle between the threads of spacetime is least which is invariably at the surface of supermassive objects. So the theory that black holes can evaporate over time is logically impossible even if they did eat all the matter available and cease to gain mass. Incredibly unlikely as the universe is full of so much gas, asteroids, planets etc and the loss of kinetic energy is so slight.   What is more likely is that they keep growing to become quasars and so large that they reach that point of resistance in the spacetime fabric and begin to slow down like an elastic that is being wound near its maximum stretch. However the great attractor black body seems to be gearing up to become an even larger object than a quasar and there is no sign of any drag in the field slowing it down.
The event horizon only applies to light because it is the path of light that is affected by gravity, light itself is not affected by gravity it always moves forward at C but will be detected to arrive from different locations if it's path has been bent, as we see with localised gravitational lensing around black bodies. Any objects with mass (matter) however are pulled into the black body from a distance far exceeding the distance of the event horizon.  The phenomena of fast radio bursts logically is either where the spin of dark stars momentarily dips below the speed of light, due to resistance in the spacetime fabric perhaps from the opposite spin of a powerful star, a smaller black body being drawn close or a much larger black body acting like a like a big heavy pulsar. Once the object has been overpowered however it's mass is absorbed if it's mass is large enough and with other matter constantly being eaten by the accretion disc as small planets, asteroids, gas etc their forward momentum adds to the momentum of the spin of the black body which then instantly increases beyond the speed of light again effectively turning off the visibility of the light again. Or like pulsars the energy is held for a while until it builds up until it can no longer be contained and is emitted in a flash.

HIGH AND ULTRA HIGH ENERGY COSMIC RAYS (added 4 Aug 2020)
Using STT the theory that high and ultra high energy cosmic rays have been travelling at this speed for long periods after being emitted from distant stars or supernovae is incorrect.  This false idea is due to the failure to understand that the spacetime fabric is a physical lattice and the the popular incorrect belief that mass is not due to resistance. So what is happening is the protons have been emitted mmost likely perhaps from our own sun and travelled towards us through space at their normal maximum speed much slower than the speed of light but in the moment just before when they are detected my guess of what is happening is that for high energy cosmic rays they are hit by a small gravitational wave which pushes these protons forward against the spacetime fabric or for ultra high energy cosmic rays a large gravitational wave passes, pushes them forward momentarily significantly beyond their normal speed. Similar in principle to how a surfer paddling her board at her maximum effort is moving forward at limited speed but once a wave big enough arrives she will be lifted and moved much faster than her normal speed. So the detection of these high and ultra high cosmic rays are rare depending on the energy of the waves hitting the protons, their original speed and direction they were travelling when the wave hit. If they were travelling in the opposite direction to the wave they would be slowed down possibly even pushed back to change direction and  move forward at various different sometimes incredibly slow speeds significantly below their normal speed rather than reach a temporary near light speed. The likelihood of finding them is very slim because it is dependent on detecting them at that moment when the passing wave temporarily increases their speed hence why they are detected relatively rarely compared to other protons detected travelling through "space". 

SPIN AND LEFT HANDED CHIRALITY (Added Nov 22)


Why left handed and right handed spin are different and our experience is that left handed chirality [45] is preferred. If a person tries to jump onto a carousel they will land safely if they approach at a similar speed and direction as the carousel. If they try to jump aboard at the same speed but from a direction opposite the spin of the carousel they will be flung off very violently due to the opposite momentum. The interaction we see is "particles" arriving from the same direction as the spin thereby being absorbed while those arriving against the spin are repelled. This is surely obvious to physicists but why this should be biased towards left handed spin is not so obvious.
This paragraph is purely theoretical postulation (perhaps waffle) 
It has been said our universe prefers left handed spin, this can perhaps be better understood by understanding time dimensions. While we have left and right handed spin in equal number in "particles" with Spring Time Theory it is logical to propose that we have both left and right handed instances in time. When these are both observed organically we see the full picture, just as light and dark together allow us experience vision, they allow computers work etc. when observed or analysed in a lab setting we can only see one spin at a time due to the limitations of time in observations. This is easily understood using the classical backward spinning wagon wheels on the old spaghetti westerns or any wheels recorded on film. Because the frame speed during recording is different than the speed of the wheels rotation at certain speeds the exposure rate captures the images which correspond to a different sequence making it look like the vehicle is moving forward while the wheels appear to be turning backwards. For us left handed chirality could be a matter of bias, because we are focused on the left handed instances of time we miss the right. Just as right handedness is the predominant mode of writing for humans our predominant mode of focus on time during scientific analysis is towards left handed time. Polar time can be described as one pull forward one pull back in time alternating at incredibly small intervals. All together we get the forward momentum in time. Hence our focus has a bias towards one pole of time. I would term these 2 alternating poles in time Alpha time and Omega time alpha being the segment which produces the push forward and omega being the pull back towards the past coming second. These two poles of time alternating eternally through space and time giving two interpretations as to why time moves forward. First interpretation is that our focus is on the future giving a left handed bias in observations with focus on calculating or assessing the best moves to make and advance through the future, less focus on the past because it takes less thought and energy due to being imprinted in our memory and DNA while the future is more uncertain and takes much more energy and calculations because unlike the past the future will affect us in a real way. Secondly that the momentum of time is intrinsically forward moving giving the Alpha pole a slightly longer time span than the Omega pole leading to an overall forward moving time giving more time to focus on left handed spin. I don't have any information regarding where or when various experiments were run to detect different handed chiralities. I am wondering can it be something as simple as most experiments are run during daytime hours so the path of Earth through the spacetime fabric affects the direction, if they were run at night we might see more right handed chirality.  Or are most experiments run in the Northern hemisphere and most of the minority chirality is detected in the south? Perhaps a mixtrue of both? It seems possible, although unlikely that no one thought of this but as I say I don't have enough data to even know whether this is absolutely false. (I don't exclude what is obvious as surely being tried before given the solution to the double slit experiment is so obvious but no one spotted it in 100 years.)
Or it may be that male energies at work in experiments get results which correspond to left handed helicity. Female energies give a view that give results which correspond to right handed helicity. Perhaps when we get all female teams running experiments with women doing everything from setting up the experiment to making the coffee, manning the security and driving yhe delivery vehicles we will get a predominantly right handed helicity in results.0 As odd and perhaps unlikely as this may seem, funny enough I think it is probably the correct answer. (https://youtu.be/Pu1aQvm5MrU)

ANTIMATTER
Anti matter is matter but oriented away from view corresponding to the opposite viewpoint of the matter particle which is usually oriented out of view or travelling in the opposite direction of spacetime so we can just about glimpse it with sophisticated detection before it travels too far backwards in spacetime relative to us. So the polar opposite RIK or line of RIKs to the detected particles emanating out from the centre of the wave will be twisting with the same energy but in the opposite direction (in the case of a detected electron the anti particle will be the positron) almost undetectable because it will travel outwards but backwards in time relative to us so we can barely detect it, when we do it is just for a minuscule moment. In a sense how two planets say Venus and Mars are on different sides to us relative to the sun, so we usually don't see them together but occasionally Mars becomes visible very faintly behind Venus as it passes by very far away from Venus but through the same visible region of space relative to us. A rare but inevitable sighting. Similar for antimatter, we usually detect matter but occasionally will detect it's opposite wave in the line of sight.   While these are groups of particles being twisted the law of observation limiting us to one dimension of space and time means we can only detect one field particle (for positrons or groups of particles for massive particles with greater mass) in any given measurement and this is very rare as the focus is generally on the field particles with the vortices in the forward dimension of time. Hugh Everett was absolutely correct when he stated that physicists are making everything over complicated and the wave function is everything, it is the spherical wave moving out in all directions in space and time. What collapses is the MEASUREMENT which can only be carried out in one dimension of space and time at any one time. All other parts of the wave still exist and the probabilistic nature of quantum mechanics is not related to their existence it is related to their DETECTION.  Antimatter is detectable because it still exists on the same dimension of spacetime but travelling in the opposite direction so it's detection is very rare and very momentary/fleeting. They may also be the adjacent energy vortices passing through particles existing beside the one detected in the nearest dimension of spacetime. These will have opposite twist (QM spin) just as any 2 cogs in a clock mechanism will have opposite rotations and the charge will also be opposite as each wave/vortice will be spinning in the opposite direction to each other so will be detected in opposite poles of time (as explained in the section on charge.)

CHARGE PARITY VIOLATION
With CP violation the assumption that particles would be emitted randomly in any direction is incorrect. If the "particles" have a spin or twist towards the left it is only possible to eject those particles in the same direction as the twist. Because it is a twist and not a full spin the sub particles can only be emitted on one side. Like if we have a canon on a boat it can swing left and right up and down but because it can't spin only twist it will fire out one general direction. If is attached back to back with another canon and both twist along the same central vertical axis both will only fire forward away from the boat within the range of the twist. Or to use the child's swing analogy again, if we sit on a swing and throw a ball out at the same speed as the swing is moving it will only go forward beyond the swing if it is thrown while the swing is moving in the same direction as the swing. If it is thrown forward while the swing is moving backwards it will not go outside the range of the swing itself
So charge is dependant on 3 dimensions of time as well as 3 of space because if it were dependant only on 3 dimensions of space the charge would vary depending on the direction/orientation of the magnet. So it is highly likely that the different dimensions of time also affect the phenomenon. Given that careful analysis of the double slit experiment shows that time and matter have an inverse relationship (verified by experimental evidence found in videos from work done by Akira Tonomura at Hitachi, physicists at Lincoln Nebraska University and the results of the which way detection all explained in the double slit experiment page) So when we rotate an object in space we also rotate it's existence in time with equal measure in the opposite direction of the relevant time dimensions.

To use a different explanation,  first be cognisant of the fact that positive or negative charge is in fact the push and pull are 2 sides of the same thing but detected and interacting as positive or negative when measured within different orientations of spacetime.
CP violation is due to slight variations in the path loops within atomic nuclei. Using STT the weak force decay of atoms is due to irregularities in the nuclei leading to the path of torlectrons moving within loops) losing perfect closed loops and those torlectrons escaping. They eventually come to a point in the spacetime fabric where the loop breaks and they are released to travel straight forward away from the atom. The direction they leave and travel away from the atom is determined by the state of twist (spin) the atom is in, the ability to detect that state of twist is determined by the bandwidth of spacetime that we measure in.  They will be flung out in the same direction as the twist just like a person will be flung out from a carousel in the same direction that it is spinning. Using STT we see that a "particle" will twist forward and backwards north/south/east/west and all sub opposites (SE/NW etc) around a relative axis. All physical matter also antimatter but oriented away from view corresponding to the opposite viewpoint of the matter particle which is usually oriented out of view or travelling in the opposite direction of spacetime so we can just about glimpse it before it travels too far backwards in spacetime relative to us. It is logical to assume that there is equal amounts of radiation emitted in all directions but we only detect those emitted in the dimensions of time that we focus on which is usually detected as matter. However the twist is not perfectly symmetrical relative to time  so we actually detect some photons/electrons emitted in the opposite direction to what we expect while the particle is in it's antimatter twist(spin) in a sense similar to how the Earth is not perfectly pivoted on the poles  relative to the sun it is at a slight angle. So while a stone thrown directly up at the North pole will usually be seen to be thrown slightly towards the sun at midday for half of the year from spring to autumn when the pole is oriented towards the sun. Once autumn comes however the pole is now pointing slightly away from the sun so the stone will still be detected for a few days but being thrown slightly away from the direction of the sun until it moves closer to  winter  and the Earth is titled away from the sun so the pole and the stone being thrown is no longer visible. Although the stone being thrown up will have an equal distribution of throws away in both orientations towards and away from the sun within one full year  less are detected when the pole is out of view. With CP violation it is similar, the timing of the twists (spin) goes out of balance with the different weighted electron orbitals, so photons/torlectrons are not emitted equally or uniformly in all directions leading to that CP symmetry beinh violated. Like the stone being thrown at the North pole the distribution of the orientation of all outward throws is equal but only most are detectable and a minority seem to move away from the sun counter to the direction of the majority. While testing for  symmetry would dictate that we do the same and throw a similar stone upwards simultaneously at the south pole the measurement of the dimensions of time prohibit multiple viewpoints simultaneously, As measurement in space and time are always restricted to one dimension of each at a time the opposite throw of the stone at the South Pole is NEVER detected within a one dimensional time paradigm just like we usually can't photograph a persons front and back at the same time it is only one at a time leading to the apparent violation of symmetry. If we put a mirror behind the person being photographed we can see both front and back, so can we find a way to reflect time like the mirror reflects light? Let's wait until everyone around the world gets familiar with the basic theory first then we will surely go deeper into the exciting stuff.


There was a section here about CPT symmetry explaining why it is not violated but I have since learned that physicists currently find no CPT violation which is what I also get using STT so being essentially irrelevant I have removed it. 


 intensity ∝ 1/distance²-E/G
FIXING THE VACUUM CATASTROPHE: HUBBLES LAW IS MORE REPRESENTATIVE OF GRAVITY THAN DISTANCES
AND THE REVISED INVERSE SQUARE LAW ADDING ENERGY LOST TO GRAVITY EN ROUTE

To summarise dark energy in one sentence it is fundamentally as a result of magnification, it is an optical expansion not a physical expansion.  To summarise the cosmic redshift in a sentence it is predominantly due to energy lost to gravity en route not distances.  The more in depth explanation follows.  

Newtons inverse square law is slightly incorrect when applied to interstellar space, it does not factor in the energy lost to gravity en route as I suspected and which was verified by Andrea Ghez's team finding Baby Ghez (SO-2) lost 0.03% of its energy when passing closest to the milky ways big momma SAG-A so the correct formula should be
intensity ∝ 1/distance²-E/G
Revised formula copyright Sean g.
E/G for the loss of energy to gravity en route
 This video explains the vacuum catastrophe. 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=i9gf-dH4SAg
The vacuum catastrophe is the misunderstanding that the acceleration of the expansion between distant galaxies is describing velocity when in fact it is magnification. If we look at one of Einsteins equations for Relativity as I did in this video by Professor Copeland at Nottingham University's Physics department https://youtu.be/nJsFsjSWYx0 å or a(t) distance over time is described as velocity because distant Galaxies are observed to be moving away from Each other. What I realised is the understanding that shows this term is interpreted incorrectly when it comes to distant galaxies, firstly it is not relating to all of spacetime it is relative to the local space only, secondly the distance between 2 distant galaxies is the PERCIEVED distance which grows with the magnification because any two points seen on the lens will APPEAR to move apart with increased magnification When we look at the equation for lambda Λ=4πGP/c² on the top of the right side of the equation what we see is essentially the surface of a sphere a sphere 4πGP where Gp is the effect the energy density has on the radius which dictates the lens magnification and we see that this must be greater than 0. So if we reduce the equation to the quantum level we know that the speed of light is always constant regardless of the units we use on the macro scale (whether it is metres, miles or Shrek's "foot" length) so in order to find Λ we must bring the unit of the radius of the sphere to 1 which we can do at the quantum level. The speed of light is the speed that the wave will move across the radius of one quantum particle/RIK so when we are at the quantum level the radius of one quantum particle in the field is 1 so c is now 1 (travelling through one unit of space and one of time) and so we square c in the equation c² and get 1 and the equation is now Λ=4πGp/1 which is Λ=4πGp. Energy quantised is a push so the push is always both ways in each dimension, we have 13 altogether so Λ=13(1/t)³. 
Which is explaining all the energy (pushes or collisions of the intersections in the field at the quantum level due to the tug and pull between gravity and the field trying to move back to rest, the Pressure overall is constant at 1 but effectively fluctuates between +1 and -1 relative to the realm of life at 0, like a guitar string too much or too little pressure/tension is cacaphonic, the sweet note comes when the string is finely tuned and oscillates:O)  in the system V and when it is divided by c² it is the energy in one dimension. 
Because we have quantised it we can also use 1 as the dimensionless unit for G, the gravitational force between any two objects with mass which we expect to be 1 at the quantum level.  So what is this telling us? We know that Λ cannot be zero otherwise there would be no curvature in spacetime so there must be a wave and that wave must be causing spacetime to curve into a sphere, that wave cannot be electromagnetic radiation it must be matter with mass and enough mass to cause curvature. What I show with Spring Time Theory is that all matter affected by or creating gravity must be above the mass of the basic kissing ball structure of 13 quantum particles which is 6.643Mev/c² and the radius of this kissing ball is 3 quantum particle or RIK radius. Light, electrons, gluons are all detections of waves Or torlectrons moving forward through a single line of field particles so they are not affected by gravity, they can curve, but it is their path that is curved. In reality only dark matter/spacetime which energy moves through is affected by gravity because gravity IS the curvature of spacetime which dictates the forward moving path of matter. So in order to get this curvature in spacetime the minimum amount of mass which creates gravity is formed at 6.643Mev/c² but in order to get the constant we must drop the system of units in this case electron volts. STT shows that most standard model particles with mass above that of an electron (apart from the neutrino family) are built from an electron and the figure of 6.643Mev/c² is the mass of 13 electrons each with a mass of 0.511Mev/c² so the constant here is 13. If we look at the acceleration equation ä/a=-4πG/3(P+3p/c²) we can deduce that in fact at the quantum level where we reduce c² to 1 then we can disregard 3p because the pressure in the space time fabric varies but  the pressure within the ether(flazzma) that runs THROUGH the spacetime fabric being a perfect fluid is always equalised with positive and negative pressure within massive objects (negative pressure) and the surrounding fabric (positive pressure) so is measurably the same (relative to any time and space scale at the quantum realm although logic indicates that this pressure is variable at a scale much, much smaller than the Planck scale, which allows for the waves, however it is constant to us) 
This t is representative of measured time, in the outermost regions of spacetime the value of  is high per unit of Euclidian space travelled whereas at the event horizon of a black body increments of measured time stop and the "unlucky for some" pulling power of lambda is inescapable.  so now we apply common sense and deduce that as the energy density of matter grows the value of P or -P (depending on your Relativistic viewpoint) increases. We know that G is relative to the curvature of spacetime so as mass increases the value of -4πG must decrease because it is a negative value, the logic shows that as the gravitational force increases the distance between any 2 points of matter with mass will decrease so G will also decrease with any increase in P. So the logic is clear, as mass grows the amount of space it occupies decreases (until the field particles are compacted as tight as possible). If we multiply both by 3 then it becomes 3(ä/a)=-4πG(P)  then the acceleration of the magnification is directly proportional to the increase in mass or matter density which decreases the radius of the local zone. So the surface of the lens decreases as the radius is being decreased. With decreased surface we get increased magnification. what I am saying is  on the left hand side ä is describing the magnification while a is describing the separation another way to say this is ä is describing the surface area of the lens and a is describing the radius. As the radius is always describing one unit of radius then the equation can be written like this 4πr²/r we must however add the factor for the pressure to drive any acceleration/magnification. and in units 4πr²P/1 so when we multiply both sides by 3 we get 12.5667... by the pressure which is consistent with STT Theory as I show it to be almost level in the macro realm to fluctuates around 1 and the deviation from one to be a similar number to the deviation from perfect flatness in the Universe at approximately 1.034... to give 13 (or incredibly close to 13) which is the group of 13 electrons in a kissing ball where gravity begins.   Because the pressure is negative pressure in the flazzma(ether inside the fabric) P is naturally a negative value so the magnification will be always slightly more than exactly relational to the radius, giving the acceleration in the magnification. When Professor Copeland explains at about 4min50sec that according to the equation the Universe must evolve, this is not exactly true, it is not the Universe as a whole it is massive gravitational zones in pockets within spacetime that must evolve. So now we know why Einstein introduced the cosmological constant, it was to make the mathematics fit in with the laws of physics. He knew that it seemed nonsensical that the universe should be expanding or at least that there was no logic to support it. This is still evident today with the vacuum catastrophe in which the mathematics show that the model must be wrong.  now we know it is magnification not expansion and it is in 3 dimensions not only the one we detect it on, as the radius a decreases then the magnification ä increases in direct proportion and the energy density of matter with gravity begins at 6.643Mev/c² 


t is representative of measured time in the physical realm, in fact in real terms P is inversely proportional to time, the less increments of measured time near gravitational zones is due to the greater negative or "dark" energy/pressure. In metaphysics the less time we leave ourselves to do something the greater the pressure.  In the outermost regions of spacetime the value of t is high per unit of Euclidian space travelled whereas at the event horizon of a dark black body increments of measured time stop and the "unlucky for some" pulling power of lambda is inescapable. 
STT uses logic to show that while there may be a spark this would not be the beginning it is merely a pulse which travels out from the core of the universe through the dark matter/spacetime lattice, body of God and would mainly interact and create matter where it meets curvature which would tend to be near the surface which is where we likely are. 

One easy way to verify that the doppler effect is not what is happening is to measure the redshift of a distant supernova
that is viewed through an Einstein cross an effect where light from the same star is split into 4 different paths and takes longer to reach Earth depending on which way it comes around a black body. Light from one super nova the Refsdal supernova has been detected as taking a year longer to pass on one side of the dark black body than the other. If distance were genuinely what is being described by redshift then both should have the same amount of redshift when they are detected. I assure you they will not, the one that takes longer to get here will have more redshift recorded from the same moment of the supernova. The Refsdal supernova effectively ends the Hubble outwards expanding Universe hypothesis because using the Hubble Hypothesis we have one explosion happening altogether in 4 different places at 4 different times. Showing that redshift data is not indicative of distance it is due to the path of light through the universe and how much energy is lost en route to gravity.
 
The initial way I described the solution to the vacuum catastrophe before I came across an explanation clear enough for me to follow and grasp (Thanks Prof Copeland) includes the correct interpretation of redshift and is
 as follows.I use an equation the show it but I am not adept at academic terminology so I explain the logic in case I am using the notation inconsistent with how academics use them. The principle is very simple. Hubble's constant is representative of the pull of gravity which affects the energy of light en route not distance. The more gravity grows the more power it has to pull in energy from passing light and massive objects, so it pulls in more and grows and pulls in more and grows and pulls in more and grows. Meaning there is more redshift occurring every next time we measure it. This is what is constantly growing not distances. 
In  spectroscopy the energy of the light is reduced as it passes through gravitational zones so the detection lines mark the pull of gravity which causes objects to lose energy. So the inverse square law and spectroscopy are being misinterpreted. The redshift is not due to objects moving away it is due to increased pull in gravitational zones passed en route which reduces the energy. To illustrate it I will show the example of the inverse square law.

The expansion of the Universe [49] according to STT is a misinterpretation or misunderstanding of the data hence why the numbers don't match when calculated. The Universe itself is not expanding rather the fabric of spacetime is expanding AROUND LARGE CELESTIAL OBJECTS: planets, stars, black bodies as large mass gathers in clumps. To understand this consider a two dimensional analogy. We can compare our classical spatially 3 dimensional universe with a 2 dimensional plane to illustrate the theory. I will use a trampoline which has a very stretchy fabric. If we insert a fork at any point in the fabric and begin twisting we will gather material in clumps around the fork. All connecting strands in the fabric within the trampoline frame will become stretched/expanded but the trampoline itself doesn't necessarily expand in fact if it´s frame is itself fabric it will contract also due to the pull inwards. With the universe the areas I am comparing with forks twisting the fabric are large celestial objects: planets, suns, black bodies. The acceleration is due to gravity growing over time accelerating the compaction of material and with that the stretch of the fabric in every direction. The larger suns and black bodies grow the more matter they can pull in so they grow exponentially over time. So it is not the universe that is expanding it is individual areas within the space time fabric which are pulling inwards expanding/stretching the surrounding TREDDs in the fabric. the Universe is in fact contracting overall. As objects grow bigger they are able to pull in more matter leading to the acceleration.

The revised equation for distance: 
Newton's inverse square law is incorrect as it does not factor in the energy lost to the pull of gravity.The inverse square law itself is not related to gravity, it simply reflects the fact that the further away from the light source we go the light is distributed between more space so the intensity decreases in the ratio of the inverse law. So gravity must be factored in separately in the calculations for cosmic distances because we have to add in the extra energy lost to the increased pull of the gravitational zones which have grown in mass in between the times of a and b. This will almost certainly (with odds surely beyond 99%) give us an overall contraction of the fabric and decreased distances and a simultaneous increased curvature in the panoramic gravitational lens effect. It should be more like this, The extra energy lost in b through the extra expansion of the fabric in gravitational zones will surely give us a greater overall number for i(b)+E/G(b) than i(a)+E/G giving us a reduced number for d²(b) and therefore a shorter distance.  Giving us a contracting universe overall.  Or if we assume a steady state universe as Albert Einstein and the great Fred Hoyle (who coined the term "big bang" ironically to emphasise how absurd it was) did, we can use Einstein's cosmological constant as a description of the stretch in the fabric. I would still argue that while we get a relatively steady state universe this is still relatively steady state over a  given time. Beyond that there is a miniscule but incremental contraction over  a longer period. So effectively for our measurements most stars outside our compacted locality of the universe remain practically the same distance from us, it is the fabric that stretches inwards into these compacted areas. Where the two identifiers are described as a and b, a being the first measurement of any specific star b is the measurement of the same star at a later time, and E/G represents the increased energy lost to the increased pull of gravitational zones passed en route to the observer, which have logically grown in mass and pull in between the times of a and b, 

(i(a)+(i(a)-i/g(a)) x d²(a) =(i(b)+(i(b)-i/g(b)) x d²(b)
Next we abbreviate the energy loss to gravity en route from  (i(x)-i/g(x)) to E/G(a , b, ....x, y or z etc)
E/G(x) = (i(x)-i/g(x))
we get the abbreviated equation

(i(a)+E/G(a)) x d²(a)=(i(b)+E/G(b)) x d²(b)
(© 13:50 central European time 12 June revised 14:14 CET 22/June/2020.. Any different expression or reordering of the sequence containing the same essence of the equation or the use of any other identifiers different from "a" and "b" still come under the copyright.  How we calculate the total gravitational pull between the two locations is much more complicated as we need to know the total mass of all the stars, black bodies and planets passed en route and the distance of the path of the light from those passed objects. Isaac Newton's work with light through prisms [13] showed us that wavelength can be changed by path change not necessarily only by linear outward/inward expansion of the Doppler effect [14] and Einstein showed that the path of light is changed by gravity  [29] so it's colour/energy would also be changed. Thanks to Andrea Ghez and team[51] we already know energy is lost but to double check it also affects the energy of light in case any sceptic might think that light would be affected any differently than a massive object, we can use Einstein's method of using an eclipse to measure the redshift of a star as it passes close to the sun and compare it to the redshift of the same star when it is far from the sun relative to us. If there were no affect of gravity on redshift the two would be the same but we expect they will show a difference. Fortunately we don't need to wait for an eclipse, we can use the data collected from work on redshift and measure again from a satellite telescope like the Hubble telescope by blocking out the sun from a few metres away from the satellite's lens and comparing the two. Best of course to use the nearest stars, perhaps even planets so the brightness allows for greater measurement of the redshift. Then again we are due a solar eclipse passing over Argentina and Chile on 14th December this year 2020. Which hopefully passes some observatories capable of running and broadcasting the experiment live around the world. What we will surely find is that when gravity is taken into account these stars will be found to be getting pulled closer to the observers (us) rather than accelerating further away. The acceleration is due to the accumulation of gravity in gravitational zones over time.

Hubble's constant is measuring the pull of gravity which affects the energy of light en route. The more gravity grows the more power it has to pull in energy from passing light and massive objects, so it pulls in more and grows and pulls in more and grows and pulls in more and grows. Meaning there is more redshift occurring every next time we measure it. This is what is constantly growing not distances. 
  imagine we are in a submarine  say a big yellow one  https://youtu.be/m2uTFF_3MaA  and we use radars to locate where an object say another submarine carrying lots of blue meanies  https://youtu.be/G2uCNd1AVJo  is we use sound waves. These however are only accurate where there is relatively still water. If there is a vortex or an undercurrent coming from an oceanic drift between us and the other sub that sound will become distorted and we won't get an accurate measure of distance or location, it may be a rough estimation but it is not accurate. It is similar with redshift. Gravity passed through en route distorts the path and the signal arriving is reduced in energy. Albert Einstein showed us that the path of light is changed by gravity and Andrea Ghez's team confirmed what we already were certain was true, that objects lose energy passing through gravitational zones, the stronger the gravitational pull the more energy is lost as it is passed.  

THE FINE STRUCTURE CONSTANT
137.035999084
A short 15 minute video showing the basic physical principle is here https://youtu.be/DXsY_nc8yMY
A long one hour  video with the metaphysics is here  https://youtu.be/0uFnwn-CnqA
The essence of what is happening with 1/137 can be explained using a triangle as explained visually in the videos. The amount of energy in any system is constant and defined by 3 entities:time, pressure and volume. If one goes down at least one of the others must go up to maintain the same level of energy. Although time is multidimensional at the quantum level it is recorded by any observer in live measurement as linear so with an electron being measured the time value remains the same and it is the transfer of value between the pressure and volume that is happening. Essentially regarding the speed of light and an electron the pressure within a photon wave meets resistance due to curvature in the field and in an instant that pressure builds so fast the ether/flazzma is sent spinning into a vortex so the volume (space covered in time) is reduced from a value of 137 units of space per unit time to one unit of space per unit of time. The reduced distance/volume is transformed into immense pressure within the vortex whose momentum sends all neighbouring field particles/RIKs into a spin also, altogether the pressure is increased by a factor of 137 and the opposite force of the neighbouring RIKs keeps that pressure constant until another force acts on it.

As for the coupling of a charged particle to an electromagnetic field, perhaps a good way to visualise this is a ship stuck in the ocean during a storm. A ship is moving as fast as it can to get back to shore which is to the ships west, however the wind is coming from the west and it is driving waves towards the ship pushing it back. The ship at full speed in calm waters moves at 137metres a minute but now the force of the waves will push the ship 137metres a minute eastward if the engines fail. So we can see here that while the ship keeps moving at full speed of 137m a minute towards shore and the waves keep lashing with the displacement force of 137m a minute the ship will remain the same constant distance from shore. In the electromagnetic field a charged particle will couple with an opposite charge at this level. When a charged "particle" say a proton comes within range of a negative charge coming from a magnetic plate it's waves will be synchronised so that instead of the two waves clashing and repelling slightly with every overlap forcing the particle to be carried away on the Crest of the wave, as two similarly charged particles would, they merge in such a way that the particle moves over to the side of the waves moving back towards the opposite charge. This repeats and with every two waves that merge the particle is propelled towards its opposite charged particle or plate. If it's charge is greater than the waves emitted by the source of the opposite charge it will move like the ship closer to the shore and eventually dock or in the case of the particle it will move towards and remain stuck to the magnet. Charge, as I explain in the section on electromagnetism, is the ether moving in and out of the field particles. Positive and negative charge are measurement of the vortexe's orientation in space as well as time. So while the vortex both sucks in and expels ether simultaneously how that is measured is dependent on its orientation. The negative charge in the electron is the torlectron sucking in ether/flazzma on the side facing the atom nucleus. So this pulls it towards the atom nucleus while at the same time the waves coming out from the turbulence of the nucleus push the torlectron vortex back.
If the push of the flow out from the magnet is greater than the pull from the suction of the particle then like the ship it will be driven away. It is at the point of 137units of distance out from the nucleus per unit of time that the torlectron is held in place.   When a wave with low energy is sent into the atom and meets with the torlectron vortex it is absorbed or dampened and usually sent back out into the field at low energy, however when it arrives with great enough energy it crashes against the wave of the torlectron vortex with such energy that the part of the incoming photon wave gets twisted into a vortex itself and is sent out away from the electron orbital until it reaches another point where it is held in that region of push pull as a new electron orbital. In other words as it loses momentum the torlectron again reaches a point where the opposite attraction between it and the nucleus pulls it back towards the nucleus, however the waves are still emanating out and the vortex is still swirling so again the torlectron gets stuck within a specific range of pull push.  It becomes held in place again by the pull push interaction with the atoms nucleus as the second electron shell. 
To understand the barrier a torlectron vortex creates around the nucleus, imagine a vortex like a hurricane on the surface of the earth, if a shaceship is at a higher altitude wanting to land it cannot do so near the vortex it must do so far away. In the electron shell the torlectron is creating the barrier at this distance because it's energy e² is twisting all the connected field particles/RIKs in every direction and these extend all the way around the sphere which in dimensionless units has the radius denoted as 1 and the surface described by 4π covering the area of the surface of the regional sphere surrounding the nucleus that corresponds to the spectral line. So within this area the waves are contained until enough energy is added to force a wave to merge and travel out until another point in that wave again gets twisted into another vortex further out and forms the second area detected as a spectral line. 
 Incidentally before I continue the charge of a proton being the same but opposite charge as an electron also supports my assertion that a proton is one torlectron wave looping in a closed manifold path.
So this is linked to pressure also leading to the fluctuation of photon emissions in atomic clocks. Not in the ether/flazzma which has constant pressure relative to us (apart from the brief fluctuation allowing the waves) but the amount of ether in different regions within the spacetime fabric that is variable with stretch, the stretch is in the space in the pipes between the field particles, the TREDDs. While the RIKs are fixed in size STT shows that the TREDDs are flexible and the amount of ether/flazzma flowing through them can fluctuate, however the TREDDs are the source of the pressure because even though they stretch with extra ether/flazzma added they constantly push and try to move back to minimum pressure.  This affects the variation in time measurement in atomic clocks in zones with different gravitational pull because as STT shows time dilation is in fact space dilation. So reduced space will cause an increase in pressure and cause a photon to be emitted to a different electron orbital at a higher level the rate at which this happens depends on the  distance of the clock from the surface and vice versa. Another thing to be aware of is the De Broglie wave and the adjacent RIKs. As the torlectron vortex moves through the field it simultaneously twists all the RIKs it is connected to. So there is one torlectron vortex twisting the particles and dictating the path of the centre of the wave, any light passing will be deflected off all the RIKs within a certain vicinity to the torlectron because they will also be twisting so much that light waves cannot pass through them and so is deflected. This is why we get the spectral lines when we pass light through atoms. The DeBroigle wave is the in and out pull and push of the torlectron to and from the nucleus. The DeBrogle wave is the waves of these twists which form peaks and troughs relative to the centre of the atom similar in a sense to how the oceans generate waves with peaks and troughs relative to the centre of the Earth. 
  

 Energy quantised is a push/collision. For any system the energy within is dictated by all three being in equilibrium. If the value of one entity increases then the sum of the other 2 values must decrease or vice versa if one value decreases the sum of the other 2 values must increase to maintain a consistent energy level.  If we want more energy but the volume and pressure are fixed we increase the time span to get more collisions, if the time and volume is fixed we increase or decrease the pressure to get more or less collisions/energy respectively, if the time and pressure is fixed we adjust the volume.  If we start at 1 for each side at the quantum level and we imagine energy as being the collisions of 2 particles then we have no energy with one particle so we add one and the sides must increase in size to accommodate it. To get the most efficient generation of energy it is best to keep the triangle an isoceles triangle where the sides are ever so slightly longer than the group of particles which will naturally form a triangle inside just like balls on a pool triangle will or balls stacked into a pyramid of any size. So we see that the sides must always be slightly longer than the hypothetical triangle that confines them not to move, this so that there is room for them to move and collide.  With the fine structure constant what is happening is the tipping point of one of the entities to convert a value to the two others. It turns out that 137 is what is called a Pythagorean Prime meaning the square of the hypothenuse is 137 which is the sum of 4² and 11² and we can use this to decipher what must be happening. However we can't now have an isoceles triangle but we can get it as close to one as possible, the Pythagoran Theorem doesn't work when one side is below 1 so we must get the side to as close to one as possible.   As pressure in the ether inside the spacetime lattice is overall uniform it does fluctuate to allow a wave move but that fluctuation is phenomenally short in time. So we can essentially keep the pressure unit distribution as near to one. However  the location of maximum pressure is in the wave and the wave hitting the field particle at that moment will have to be met with maximum resistance or opposite pressure in order to cause enough wobble in the field particle/RIK to twist the ether/flazzma into a vortex.This resistance is caused by curvature, if the field particle/RIK is twisted when the wave arrives then the flow through is restricted, as there is now greater resistance this transfers the energy from the momentum of the wave into the field particle/RIK causing increased wobble/twist and at the critical level the resistance transfers so much momentum it twists the RIK so much it twists the ether/flazzma inside into a vortex. 
So using the Pythagorean Theorem to the triangular representation of energy with time, pressure and volume each on one side we can set one side as 1.0002 which is the closest we can get to 1 and the second longest side to √136.0000 the longest side opposite the hypothenuse whose length is √137.035999084, (I will explain why soon). I knew that a photon is converted into a torlectron detected as an electron when the energy level is above a certain angle and energy but I was struggling to explain it succinctly. So after watching a slew of videos on youtube and reading wikipedia articles for a few days I started to see a pattern emerging. The Pythagoras's theorem, I also learned that the speed of light in natural or dimensionless units is 137.035999084 times faster than the speed of the electron and this set off a light! I remembered the triangle method of equalizing pressure, time and volume. I remembered the pattern of the Pythagoras'sTheorem and again on the channel sixty symbols on youtube the 137 came up as the sum of 11² and 4² a Pythagorean prime. I began playing with the figures trying to see what may be uncovered, the square root of 137 is 11.7046999107 but no obvious connection came easy. I tried to set one side to 1 to make it easy but soon realised that the Pythagoras's Theorem has a cut off point because one side cannot be 1 it must be greater.  It must be a value greater than one to keep the right angle so I worked on the figures trying to keep the value as close to one as possible. Soon enough I figured out that 1.000262767 was the minimum value of the shortest side of the triangle needed in the Pythagorean Theorem. It is the shortest length a side can be to keep it a right angle triangle. In order to adhere to the constant 137.035999084  (It is best to keep the full number also as it contains the numerical name of the father in it. 999 the basic building block/cell of God the beautiful Universe whom we live within. As Einstein is said to have uttered "Coincidence is God's way of staying anonymous"...not any more.) When the wave of light exceeds the energy to keep it flowing freely it forces the ether/flazzma into the vortex so the velocity is transferred from a forward moving path to a spinning path rather than moving 137.035999084 units of space forward in one unit of time it spins around inside the RIK 136.035... times within a unit of time and simultaneouly moves forward in 1.000262767... unit of space as some of the momentum keeps it moving forward. As that volume/distance is reduced from 137.035999084 to 1.000262767... the sides of the triangle flip in that moment of impact and so volume or distance is converted into phenomenal negative pressure as the ether/flazzma is displace by the momentum of the vortex out into the field, also leading to a slight increase in DETECTABLE time which increases in direct proportion to mass.
The slight curve in our region in the Universe with a deviation of roughly 0.4% off perfectly flat assists in the conversion of the energy wave into the vortex
  
 
If we look at the equation for the fine structure constant at the quantized level rather than the atomic level we have alpha a=e²/4π.  We must remain aware that the whole model of particle physics has excluded the ether. Einstein was a part of this problem also by prematurely concluding that light comes in discrete packets "photons" but STT shows that light is DETECTED in discrete LOCATIONS.  So the figure e²/4π is at the quantum level related to pressure also. While overall it is logical that any fluctuation in pressure in the ether/flazzma equalises at time scales within the fabric which are phenomenally shorter than even the Planck time any variation will still affect the impact of energy hitting a RIK. The figure of e²/4π seems to be describing e² as the surface area of the wave of energy hitting the surface of the ether within the RIK. In a perfect quantised wave that wave is a sphere so that wave meeting resistance will be momentarily squashed until its centre of momentum surpasses the threshold of resistance and in almost equal pressure in a perfect liquid that will be just before the centre of the wave so e² is effectively πr² the energy of the wave hitting the surface of the body of fluid in the RIK. 4π is describing, the surface of the sphere of that body of fluid and every layer of fluid in between the outer surface and the centre of the vortex.  We know this must be related to pressure and there must be an ether also because what else would give a wavelength variation? We know there is one "note" which is h defined by the Planck numbers so if there is one note and it always travels at the speed of light c the only thing that can affect the frequency of that note is pressure. Any musician should know that the pitch is determined by the length, spatial volume and tension, say for example in a harp the string length by it's diameter and the stress on it but we can increase the volume (of the sound wave) by adding more pressure. So the connecting pipes in the field at neutral pressure will have the same volume and the note will be the same regardless of stretch. So the only way for the frequency of the note to vary is with pressure. To visualise it imagine an ocean wave, it grows due to pressure. It's wavelength and height is proportional to the amount of pressure applied per volume of seawater the greater the pressure the higher the wave. It is similar but restricted in the field, the size of the RIKs and the pipes/TREDDs dictate that only a wave of a certain energy limit can pass through, when that energy limit is reached but there is more pressure coming then the pressure builds again until the wave builds to the limit again and passes.  The greater the pressure the less time it will take for the wave to build up giving increased frequency, so the amount of pressure applied to the ether/flazzma dictates the frequency of the wave. This is detected by the wavelength of light. Common sense tells us that light cannot be a particle moving through empty space, as the current model claims, because if we threw a ball across a field it will never have a path shaped like a sine wave going up and down as it moves forward. It is simply ridiculous. (To step briefly into metaphysics, perhaps a lesson to us all that even the greatest thinker of the modern age like Einstein can become distracted and lose his grip/focus on common sense when allured by the temptations of sexual attention that fame brings and loses his loving grip on his wife and children.) So the sine wave is the movement of the field particles oscillating as the wave of energy passes through the fabric.  It is the momentum of the wave causing the RIKs to wobble back and forth However above a certain energy level of e²/4π that oscillation disturbs the RIK so much because the pressure in the wave is so large that it creates a full twist and because the ether cannot be pushed straight through it sends the wave in the ether into a torlectron which twists the RIKs it passes along, which we detect as an electron. This conversion of a wave into a vortex is instant and converts a forward moving wave into a spinning one. What is important to remember is that the measurement problem is the fact we can only detect events happening in one dimension of space and time. So while we only detect one electron the reality is every other particle in the field is twisted also like cogs in a clock. So we have up to billions of RIKs being twisted back and forth within the region. The probability is not related to where the electron exists it is related to where the torlectron will be DETECTED.  
The reason for e²/4π is the energy wave hitting the RIK, so its area hitting the surface of the body of fluid inside the RIK is e² and 4π is the curved surface of the region of the fluid inside and every theoretical spherical layer of ether molecules in between the RIKs surface and the centre of the axis of the vortex. If we look at the formula for vortices [93] we see that the equation for the dynamics inside a vortex is I/2π but this is for a vortex moving forward in one dimensional direction say a wave coming along an x axis being twisted into a vortex around a y axis like we might usually find on the surface of water on the Earth. In the RIK however the wave is rotating around one axis but in 2 dimensions rather than one so we get 4π (also indicative of the surface area of the sphere) . This still doesn't give us 137 so the big question is what is the factor that converts 4π (12.5667...) into 137? If we look at the Hartree units of measurement [94] we see that the speed of light is approximately 137.035999 atomic units of velocity in other words it travels 137 times further in one unit of time than an electron . This indicates to us that pressure is important in the dynamics because if it weren't due to pressure there should be no limit to acceleration.  Just as significantly it shows that the speed of light is linked to the fine structure constant so if  light at neutral pressure in a vacuum travels 137 times faster than an electron I would use the trianglular method of expressing energy as a triangle where the energy is dependent on time, distance and pressure to figure out what is going on. So knowing that light cannot travel faster than this we can apply common sense and deduce that the wave can only grow to a certain size which is limited by the pressure and volume within the particles in the field. STT shows that the RIKs are uniform in size/volume/shape but the connecting pipes/TREDDs between them are flexible. If the wave is moving along a uniform field like the spacetime fabric that momentum will be balanced so any extra pressure applied will either build up and distort the field pushing the RIKs so much they cause a build up in pressure and congestion to ripple out as a wave known as a gravitational wave. On the quantum scale where there is enough momentum to create electrons and other sub atomic particles the momentum from their wobble creates waves of light which move through the RIKs, perhaps the ripples from light oscillations will be detected in time corresponding to the theorised axions. Or if the field is not perfectly symmetrical (and we know it isn't it is calculated to be approximately 4% off from perfect symmetry of 1/1) and the pressure/force is not so much that it causes a gravitational wave, then the RIKs being passed with energy above 137 atomic units of velocity per unit time and space will be aligned ever so slightly veering left or right (giving bias in chirality also) so a wave passing through the RIK with an energy level that exceeds the shortest wavelength limit will become imbalanced and the twist in the RIK will be so much that the wave will be converted into a vortex. 
To recap: The wave affecting the electron in the orbital is the torlectron created in the field by the nucleus creating turbulence, waves of photons of low energy as it twists and turns through the field.  These waves push the torlectron out in one instance but the twist of the vortex also pulls back as does the suction or negative charge of the electron,  because the nucleus and the electron are aligned opposite in space and time to each other and because the electron also generates a vortex which is aligned in such a way that as the wave from the nucleus pushes it out it is pulling in ether and the push of the wave from the nucleus is effectively cancelled out by the pull of the torlectron expelling ether away from the nucleus. When the torlectron is pushing out a wave it is in a trough so it's pull is cancelled out by the pull of the nucleus. The wave affecting the torlectron in the orbital is the vortice created in the field by the turbulence of the nucleus creating waves of photons of low energy as it twists and turns through the field.  These waves push the torlectron out in one instance,  because the nucleus and the torlectron are aligned opposite in space and time to each other and because the torlectron also generates a wave which is aligned in such a way that as the wave from the nucleus pulls it in it is pushing out ether and the push of the wave from the nucleus is effectively cancelled out by the pull of the torlectron. When the torlectron is pushing out a wave it is in a trough so it's push is cancelled out by the pull of the nucleus. This is also why a photon is emitted between electron orbitals when energy is applied to atoms. The torlectrons create a barrier with the electron shell so any electromagnetic radiation generated by the nucleus is contained and cancels out any build up in energy. With atoms that have more than one electron orbital this is where the wave is so energetic it arrives to create a swell so momentous it forces the torlectron out of that range where the push pull equals out, so it is carried out away from the first electron orbital and that swell gradually decreases in momentum until the spin of the vortex created by the nucleus slows it down and the torlectron being carried on it and held in a higher range where the pull push is constant within a uncertain range. The charge of this torlectron is detected by us as negative because that is how it is aligned to us but it's alignment is opposite to the torlectrons in the lower shell so to them it would appear like a positron and the same type of pull push applies between these vortices. Perhaps another reason why it is so difficult to detect antimatter, it is the part of the wave that is oriented away from us when we measure it in an atomic shell and because we are more likely to detect the vortice when it is in the hemisphere nearest us. The time value is virtually the same overall but the time dilation of measurable time in every wave vortex/torlectron formed in the electron orbital further out corresponds to the energy level applied to the units of pressure and volume of all the the last ones. The combined force of the units of pressure and units of distance/volume is always added to make the ratio of volume to pressure always constant at the "biting point" where the pressure builds up enough to create or hold another vortex, always at 1:137 which is the total units of volume to pressure in the ether/flazzma between the nucleus and each farthest torlectron held in the electron shells.

 Where each single torlectron further out adds a barrier to distance the units of pressure increase with each new torlectron/vortex formed until it is such that it creates enough torlectrons to cause a total barrier and build enough pressure to send the resulting momentum of any incoming photons rebounding out past the barrier. The 3rd level electron shells that have torlectrons spinning not in a sphere but in dual pairs that visually are like 2 pear shaped orbitals which sit on one dimension, each one sitting opposite each other on either side of the nucleus correspond to the trojan objects that are linked to planets and stars as explained here https://youtu.be/zZ3B20EqtgY . Their effect on the quantum level however is much more affected by the pressure in the ether/flazzma than they are at the macro level so the effect is phenomenally more profound and distinct.

In metaphysics terms this is why people who have very finely turned senses can see an aura around living beings. All matter creates light but it is generally very weak, however the light generated by living beings can be phenomenal. We are made up of 99% water molecules so we are generating a phenomenal amount of microscopic photons of low energy which combine and radiate out from our bodies as relatively strong waves. When people see an aura around a person it is to with their level of enlightenment and cleanliness within the mind, this is the fluids within the mind and the metallic nerve connections (in eyes, connecting channels and processing regions of the brain.)  The brain is a very sensitive organ and should be treated with due care, just as excess fat, especially animal fats clog the veins and arteries they can also clog the brain and limit the brain functioning. Surely one reason why fruit alcohol and psychedelics, (both substances created in abundance by fungi) are very effective on and attractive to humans. They clean out areas within the brain that water is inefficient at cleaning, similar in a sense to a drain clogged with grease. We can apply a jet of water at huge pressure to the drain and with enough time and pressure lodge most of the grease just as we can do with water fasting on the body. However if we add detergent and spirits like for example cellulose thinners and soap to the drain it will dislodge the fat/grease much more efficiently and thoroughly. So for us, when our minds are clean we can see, think and feel with much greater efficiency. 

In essence dark energy is the vortex of negative pressure/energy created in the building block of all matter, the torlectron. 

Early in the 20th Century astrophysicists studying stars noticed that distant stars appear to be moving away from us so concluded the universe must be expanding. [68] But this seemed a bit odd because the universe is full of gravity which pulls things closer. So to try to explain it they imagined a mysterious force must be at work and they called this force dark energy.
Dark energy is a theoretical energy used to provide an answer to the seemingly paradoxical phenomena of the expanding universe I.e. if gravity is pulling everything in why is the universe expanding? Physicists have proposed dark energy as this elusive force but it is in fact panoramic gravitational lensing. The reality is that as gravity pulls in, the fabric of space expands, not the universe, for example if we put a finger in a spiders web at the middle and twist then it acts like gravity it pulls in the web, the web strands expand as it gets stretched. Why objects  may APPEAR to be moving apart is an optical illusion called gravitational lensing but unlike the well known localised gravitational lensing around black bodies this gravitational lensing is affected by huge different expanses of space and time which affects the magnification of our view. 

Einstein's biggest mistake is often referred to as "Einsteins biggest blunder" [80] known as the cosmological constant. In truth his biggest mistake was thinking light must be discrete particles. Einstein believing in a steady state universe formulated the equation for the cosmological constant to describe the logic that stops the overall universe from expanding or contracting with varying amounts of gravity. In a sense it describes the tension in the space time fabric which counteracts with a pull against any effects of the pull by gravity. The evidence that was concluded to show  stars  are moving away from each other was discovered in the 1920's by Edwin Hubble [83] which led physicists to conclude the universe was expanding outwards. Given the evidence it was concluded that Einstein's cosmological constant was wrong, his cosmological constant should restrain it. So Einstein retracted his cosmological constant and accounts tell us he termed it the biggest blunder of his life. However with recent improvements in technology and available data in order to redress the mathematics of an expanding universe which are so incorrect/at variance with the predictions, called the vacuum catastrophe, Einstein's cosmological constant is repeatedly brought back and used to make sense of the numbers [82] and as a result repeatedly gives numbers that are consistent with the observations. Now with Spring Time Theory the logic shows that this restraining tension is intrinsic to the universe and consistent with a universe that expands or to use another term gets stretched inwards towards gravitational zones. As it does the observations over space and time become subject to magnification by the lens effect.A similar lack of understanding relating to distance is demonstrated by the dramatisation of the fictional catholic priest Father Ted Crilly in this youtube clip [81] https://youtu.be/MMiKyfd6hA0
Another recent observation by astrophysicists that demonstrates why the Hubble interpretation of redshift due to an outwards expanding universe is incorrect and my interpretation of redshift due to pathchange and gravity is known as the Refsdal supernova. This supernova was observed at 4 different times due to its light being bent in 4 different directions as it passed through the gravitational well of a black body. This creates a phenomenon known as an "Einstein cross" where the light passing through the gravitational well of a black body is bent and visible to us at the 4 directional points of the zone say for example at exactly North, South, East and West of the black body's  gravitational zone. Unless the supernova was positioned exactly at a point behind the black body's centre relative to us then it would take longer for each image to arrive at Earth because each observation would have taken slightly longer than the first to arrive here. The reason this demonstrates why the Hubble interpretation is wrong is that each time the light arrived it would have had different levels of redshift due to each observation having a different length of path and a different amount of energy lost to gravity en route. So using the Hubble interpretation each time the supernova was observed it would have been interpreted as being in a different location and either further away or nearer to us but this is clearly not the case, the supernova happened at one time and at one location. The reality is when we look out at the Universe we only have a rough idea of where galaxies are and very little idea of how near or far they are from us. In a sense it is like looking at the stars from below the water through an ever increasing magnification. The image that we would see would be distorted by the ripples and waves on the surface of the water, for us in cosmology those are the ripples and waves caused by gravity in the cosmic web. 


The universe visible event horizon is not that we are losing stars etc as they travel away from us, it is increased curvature bending/redshifting the light´s path so eventually its path is curved so much it bends, loses so much energy it dims and goes out of view from the Earth completely.
No other model I have come across can explain how the supposed initial expansion slowed down then began to accelerate. STT theoretically could but I don´t encourage it. So it is not that stars are moving away from us causing redshift. It is because of the redshift as light shifts direction and loses energy as it passes through the increasingly expanding gravitational zones, expanding fabric strands stretch more as objects gain more and more mass and are compacted tighter together. The previously mentioned inverse square law [50] was used to calculate the speed stars are moving away from us due to the energy loss but this is no longer valid. The international team of astrophysicists studying the activity of stars around the milky way´s central dark black body Sag-A [51] over the last few decades found last year (2019) that the star SO-2 (baby Ghez) lost 0.03% of its energy as it passed close to Sag-A´s gravitational well. So it is the overall energy lost by light as it travels through the space time fabric that is being calculated not distance. It is conceivable that distant stars are still moving away and we have to factor in the loss of energy due to gravity but the logic does not support it. The logic supports that these stars are actually being pulled closer towards us. Just like any 2 points in the trampoline analogy would be brought closer with any fork twists so it is with the stars we observe. This is not only a logical explanation it seems to be the only explanation that even attempts to address why a theoretical initial expansion called inflation slowed down then accelerated again. This initial expansion of inflation is not logical, a certain expansion is possible at an early time but not on the scale proposed by big bang proponents. The fact that the logic of STT shows that there is flazzma in the fabric means a big bang from a single point is more or less impossible. It is time to go back and look at everything again.
Inflation itself has no basis in reality it is a "fudge" to sugar coat the many flaws in the big bang model which show it to be incorrect in the hope that a missing link can be found. There isn't one, it is simply incorrect. 

The earlier universe has multiple possible states, it could contract and expand in cycles in areas the size of the average galaxy, or it possibly reached a state of equilibrium where the tension holding the fabric together and the inherent push of the coiled springs reached a state of balance. This was after a period where the fabric had been wound tightly into gravitational clumps so huge that the overall universe had contracted with the pull. Then some event happened to cause perhaps a number of super massive objects, together containg all the mass of the Universe, in unbelievably large black bodies, to perhaps collide and disperse. One off the cuff postulation, there may be multiple credible hypotheses, time will tell. This cycle of expansion and contraction happening many times over the life of the universe in what is called the Big Bounce [52] (what I called the big pulse before I came across the term the big bounce). Or perhaps there are many such cycles of compaction and release in different locations. Now we in the Milky Way and surrounding areas are in the phase where gravity is accelerating and causing the stretch in the fabric by large and growing stars and black bodies which will perhaps eventually lead to another very compacted area in the Universe which at some point will reach a tipping point in some way and disperse again.

COSMIC MICROWAVE BACKGROUND
The common belief among physicists is that space is largely empty but this couldn't be further from the truth. The fabric of spacetime, the dark matter lattice/cosmic web fills every possible part of space. This is where the temperature of space is. This can surely easily be verified by taking measurements near planets which are nearer or further from the sun than Earth for example Venus and Mars, or Mercury and Saturn. The lattice of space may be found to be slightly hotter nearer Venus and slightly colder nearer Mars for example but again we have the problem that NASA are still holding to the lie that they went to the moon when this is clearly impossible as anyone who looks independently at the data will see. Hence the reliability of the data released to the public is questionable, so the risk to humanity increases and the outlook for our children having any hope of a future becomes increasingly bleak day by day because of this short sighted violence focused, tribal paranoia. 
Knowing the Universe has a flazzma "coursing through it's veins" effectively rules out the big bang, the Universe is not expanding outwards but rather contracting slightly at present as it is stretched into gravitational zones and even in the highly unlikely but possible scenario that it is expanding due to organic growth it is only slightly so and nowhere near the rate currently estimated. Even if this is the case the region of growth is evidently outside our visible Universe so any speculation can not be verified by us The cosmic microwave background is not remnant radiation from a previous era in time just after a Theoretical big bang. There are 2 distinct possibilities for explaining the CMB, first.  It is light from celestial objects that has passed through more gravitational zones and lost more energy en route. So much so that the clear picture of stars and galaxies becomes like a photograph out of focus when detected in the microwave range. That is common sense, the temperature of the Universe is affected by all electromagnetic radiation passing through not only the microwave radiation. So if the Universe is not expanding but contracting and we know the visible Universe is at least 92 billion light years wide we logically deduce that it is actually already much much older than 46 billion years old.  It tells us which side of our celestial hemisphere is nearer to the outside of the spherical Universe and which is nearer the centre. One could Hypothesise that the figure used to explain the speed matter travels at inflation which can no longer be accepted is even possibly somehow more relational to the distance from our location to the centre of the universe, or the age in years of the Universe itself. 
The anisotropic property of the CMB is logically due to the position of our visible universe within the universe itself. STT predicts that most matter exists at the "edge" of the universe where light rebounds and interacts with a predicted big pulse/bounce. So when we look towards the outer edge of the universe the connections between the quantum field particles "RIKs" are closer to flat right angled intersections and we expect to get less redshift due to less curvature/gravity. The further we go in the other direction the more redshift we are likely to detect as the angles between connections is more acutely angular. The large dark spots found in the CMB are likely due to two reasons, firstly light emitted passes through zones with more curvature so less light reaches us, secondly the fact that because of more curvature black bodies (black and white holes) can grow much larger than they can nearer the edge. Near the edge when quasars grow to a certain size in a fairly flat area of spacetime I expect they have two poles whose relative stability in orientation allows them reach that point of resistance in the fabric which causes immense friction detected as the jets which in fact are creases in the fabric and the incredible amount of colliding kinetic energy means they fling galaxies worth of light and matter out into space. For dark stars in zones with more curvature and less symmetrically opposed poles they are likely to have shifting poles which means with less stability and more movement in orientation they can grow significantly perhaps phenomenally larger in mass before they cause that resistance in the fabric. They would likely not have the distinct accretion discs due to their ever shifting polar orientations. So the hemisphere of our visible universe where we see the greatest concentration of these large dark areas is likely to be in the inner area and somewhere beyond them is the centre of the universe itself. The other perhaps possible explanation for the CMB is resonance. Just like a piano string resonates after it is struck the RIKs in spacetime perhaps continue to resonate after a photon of large energy has passed and that resonance is detected as microwave radiation.  While we can play many different notes on a piano the piano itself has it's own intrinsic note that all separate notes will merge into. This is the background resonance of the piano, in the spacetime fabric the CMB is perhaps the resonant note of the field as all different vibrations pass through it. I initially thought this hypothesis should be fairly easy to check by mapping all the electromagnetic radiation from gamma rays to visible light in the Universe and see if there is a corresponding pattern between this map and the map of the CMB. I have recently learned that this exactly the case. Physicists put thermometers into space to record the temperatures of the field in different directions. This is exactly what has been recorded and which is in line with my hypothesis of resonance. The variation in temperature is consistent with the variation of galactic clusters which nullifies the ancient redshift of a hypothetical big bang for 2 reasons. Firstly the fact it is relational to galaxies that are visible means the temperature is the actual temperature of the field, the dark matter/spacetime lattice being heated by the light passing through it. Secondly if it were ancient redshifted light there should be no correlation to younger galaxy clusters, it should Theoretically have come from much farther away in order to grow weaker over time. One can't logically have 2 different ages of light coming from the same source in space and time. Even the scifi inflation outwards expanding universe theory cannot uphold this anomaly, it simply makes no sense and adds further, verifiable evidence (not based on assumptions) that the big bang is wrong. 


WHITE HOLES
The idea of white holes has been described in many ways by physicists and mathematicians as difficult to imagine and so far never discovered, one such attempt at being humorous I watched has a celebrity physicist describe white holes as a figment of mathematics imagination. Not so. 
Noethers Theorem is watertight for measurement of symmetries in one dimension of time but in order to understand why Relativity correctly predicts White holes, which may appear to violate Noethers Theorem but in fact don't, it is important that one understands the measurement problem, the initial condition and 13 is the number of dark matter particles in the fundamental unifying block FUB (that constitutes gravity being initiated is the constituent shape of all detected matter larger than an electron which is a clump of 13 spheres "kissing balls" of 12 around 1). The measurement problem is that we can only measure between 2 points in one dimension of space and time in any single act of measurement, so we cannot measure the total value of the energy we can only deduce it. What we must do is use our understanding to apply the result from one dimension and extrapolate what the total energy generated within the system must be. We must also apply the very fundamental law of physics (and karma) cause and effect (for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction) and combine it with the reality of what the solution to the double slit experiment proves, that energy is CREATED and propagates out in waves. This shows that it is not in fact that energy is conserved but that the initial value of energy detected along one dimension is conserved. It is always propagated with the same value in all directions but detected along one dimension The energy detected is also propagated back into negative (antimatter) time from the initial source of the wave (and again backwards from every point/particle that is passed in the field but this propagates inwards so immediately cancelled out). In summary: The fundamental building block of spacetime has 13 spacial dimensions (like a rubik's cube) so with every increment in conscious time the oscillation emanating from the centre of that block is propagated out in 13 directions to the power of twice the measured time.

At the quantum point 0 the spherical field particle is the source of the wave and every propagation out from that point in dimensionless numbers has time as 1 which is the radius. That is until another force acts upon some part of the wave, in the field that force is π^p otherwise known as curvature and p being the total pressure caused by curvature.

In metaphysical terms symbolised by 0 the spherical curvy, flexible, quiet, unseen, female physical Universe (dark matter lattice). Unseen until it is acted upon by the push of 1 the male conscious power exerting conscious energy (willpower) along one dimension, l and O the universal symbols of on/off and the notation of binary. The resulting wave of the interaction of both emanates out in all directions detected/experienced as light and where that light meets more curvature matter is created and the conscious experience of physicality is possible. Energy creating more energy and physicality as it goes. From the initial force of consciousness causing the initial stretch in the flexible, beautiful, soft, but infinitely strong, curvy, female sphere as proven by the mathematics of Grigori Perelman's team's work on the Poincare Conjecture which I describe as a pulse propagating in 26 directions (Λ^2t) from the initial inception of the universe and growing exponentially ever since.
 
In this video I explain where the 1st White hole is identified along with an astonishing admission from the "2nd Man on the moon" Buzz Aldrin who has his hand on his heart as he states it.
https://youtu.be/TG32FVYmD60
I say we sit right beside one and without it we would not have life on the planet. Our sun and every bright star we see in the sky is what I believe is the physical manifestations of the white holes predicted by Einsteins equations of Relativity. Nothing can enter the sun, any matter would be surely either scorched and melted or pushed away from the sun by the immense electromagnetic radiation long before they can get anywhere near the surface. Because the mathematics revealed by the double slit experiment show that energy is created in multi dimensional spacetime it overturns the whole current theory of the formation of stars and black bodies, which beg many questions that current physicists cant explain. Not only stars but planets. The solution to the double slit experiment shows that energy begets energy and the more energy that is contained within a closed unit the more energy will be created within it also.While most energy created ripples out through the field as kinetic energy detected as neutrinos above a certain density it can't and that energy becomes "locked in" multiplying exponentially at maximum finite (not infinte) density.  On our planet this is supported by the evident expansion of the tectonic plates on the surface. The classical way of thinking about planet formation suggests our planet should be cooling from the inside out over time giving a reduced size. Instead the continental drift suggests the opposite, that the more energy there is within the closed system of the Earth the more energy it generates over time. The idea that it is nuclear processes only that generate the production of energy within the sun seemed dubious also and now is replaced with a more complete understanding. There certainly will be nuclear processes happening with the sun, there is no doubt about that but these are likely to also be multiplied in multidimensional spacetime. So the idea that stars have a finite lifetime and they eventually run out of fuel stands as incorrect, our sun using the mathematics revealed by the double slit experiment is set to continue to grow in mass and energy because energy is constantly being created by energy itself. So it will one day become so large in mass that it becomes a supernova and eventually it will evolve into a black body. Our planet also will continue to grow and eventually generate so much energy that it too becomes a sun. (Surely over billions of years so no need to panic dudes but still it is inevitable).
While the classical explanation for the mechanism for the conditions creating a supernova would seem to be correct, an expansion at the core unable to sustain itself collapsing seems correct, very clever and verifiable in simulations the actual dynamics are not fully answered with the current models and in fact are quite different using the correct model that works. At the centre of every star is a region of intense gravity, in some this is actually a black body,  the internal pressure reaches some kind of line of split where the energy reaches two forces of nature fighting against each other within the same closed system. On one hand we have the intense gravity near the core constantly pulling as energy is drawn towards the path of least resistance this pull naturally grows ever stronger and stronger giving greater gravitational pull. On the other hand we have massive amounts of compaction of the spacetime fabric at the core creating an insane amount of space dilation at the outer layers where Hydrogen and other elements build up releasing the insane amount of heat/light. Also the constant build up of pressure within the elements at the outer layers mainly Hydrogen constantly stretches the fabric towards breaking the manifold loops the elements are held within. Combine this with the fact that the energy within the electron orbitals near the surface is constantly bombarded with more and more energy, this logically leads to a build up of built up outwards pressure. More energy being created mainly from the very centre of the sun constantly creates ever more waves of photonic energy that moves out to the other layers where it gets trapped and circulates and builds up in this outwards pressure. The supernova moment comes when the force of gravity pulls in so much that the energy that is pushing out at the surface reaches a point where the electron orbitals within atoms can no longer accommodate the stretch and a chain reaction where gazillions of atoms of Hydrogen are no longer able to hold shape releasing a phenomenal amount of a suns energy in an extremely rapid chain reaction, almost like a balloon bursting but releasing energy rather than pressurized air as the balloon would. Millions of years worth of everyday light in an instant. It the mathematics and the logic shows that a star will go through cycles where it will still hold enough Hydrogen and other elements to "stay alive" as a visible star https://youtu.be/fNFzfwLM72c This can also now be understood as where we get the different stages of element formation as the growing regions of intense gravity and even black body at the core remains hidden from outside observers until it reaches such a humongous mass that the outside layers can no longer fight its attraction or hold any manifold shapes due to the immense space dilation and we get a long life period within a black body. Again however we get the accretion disc that we witness around magnificent/malificent (depending how you view them) black bodies at the centre of Galaxies which grow and grow until they also form the ultra massive stars we can view throughout the universe, stars billions of times the mass of our sun. This also helps explain a possible pulse of energy from a super duper, whopping, "mother flutter" dark black body that the logic indicates exists at the centre of our spherical universe. Minor pulses are created by mini black bodies "big mommas" as supernova as they evolve over time and the same happens from the universes central Black body "bigga momma" giving what may possibly be (highly unlikely though) the big pulse that may have been incorrectly mistaken for a big bang (although I doubt it). In fact the central black body at the core of the universe would logically also be growing and be alternating between being a dark black body and white hole emitting these pulses, creating and releasing more energy like an unstoppable single parent constantly having to alternate between being big bad momma and big bad dad like single parents do. Probably why she chose to withhold the truth from mankind for 100 years because without her/his guidance we clearly would not survive with human leadership alone. Maybe also s/he simply wants to be loved, to be recognised and offered the energy we create as love, after all after creating us and nurturing us and bringing us to life in such a beautiful planet s/he deserves to be showered with love, acknowledged, be listened to and not have to constantly remind us to obey the house rules.I expect the black body nucleus at the centre of our sun is perhaps the size of an apple, basketball, sports stadium or something similar certainly tiny in comparison to the visible sun. 

 
WORMHOLES
WORMHOLES I have previously thought impossible or improbable perhaps are not so improbable after all given that white holes make perfect sense when we view the mathematics and the logic as being visible stars. The fact that suns are the white holes predicted by Einstein suggests that there must be perfectly logical, perhaps well known, objects of formations that explain wormholes. As has often has happened with my work following the logic somethings that seem odd in the mathematics of Relativity suddenly become very clear. I could seem to find no celestial phenomenon to explain wormholes....until I saw this video. The image explained in this video seems to illustrate very clearly some of the wormholes at the centre of our milky way galaxy and I explain why here. https://youtu.be/-xt6OKey7OQ
These wormholes however are twists in the fabric and in no way resemble the wormholes of science fiction which magically instantly transport matter between different regions of space and time, that is fantasy. 
It seems to me, the long lines detected in these images of the centre of our galaxy are definitely wormholes. In Relativity they are formed between 2 different regions in space that are closer in time than Euclidian space, here it is the top and the bottom of the Galaxy disc connected and the wormhole is created similar to a whirlpool in a stream due to the varying activity and differences in the tides of the spacetime fabric. This causes the matter to twist into whirlpools which tend to sustain themselves over ligh periods of time as long as the flow continues. Or where the turbulence is very erratic they would tend to form and disperse with new whirlpools/wormholes forming in the same general area.  The reason it connects regions which are closer in time is because due to the immense gravitational activity around the galactic centre clock time would be slowed down so much so that in some regions near the surface of "black bodies" it ceases to be able to be measured using clocks. Yet at both surfaces of the galactic disk clock time would be recorded at much much faster rates. This means that both surfaces of the disc, the top and bottom would be closer in time to each other than they would be to the interior. The flow of clock time in the centre is always much slower than it is at both surfaces, remember that conscious time is constant it is only the measurement of time that is variable within the physical Universe. This is consistent with Marxs law because on a smaller level whirlpools in water always form perpendicular to the surface and here we have 2 surfaces, the top and bottom of the galactic disc. (Added 8.20 15th June 2021) There is also where black bodies themselves appear to act as wormholes. This is the twisting of the spacetime fabric by quasars, massive black bodies so dense and spinning so fast that their momentum twists the very fabric of space into visible strands as the twist causes massive compaction which in turn causes the quantum particles to knock against each other with extreme intensity producing insane amounts of light and heat. This is what moves through such a wormhole, energy! The energy from the black body is transferred to the field as kinetic energy and becomes manifest visually as the "jets" where the strands of the spacetime fabric become twisted and compacted, this generating massive amounts of physical phenomenon due to the intense knocking of particles against each other as light, torlectrons and thereby more gases and thereby the conditions for eventually a new crop of planets, stars, mini black bodies and galaxies.  The idea that we or any other physical object could be transported through them to another point in spacetime however unfortunately doesn't stand up to logic. Once we understand that we like all matter move within the fabric of spacetime not somehow outside it the idea of using the twisted fabric as a tunnel simply becomes implausible. Even if it formed a tunnel like shape we still move within the walls of any such tunnel rather than inside the tunnel itself. I had considered that maybe quantum tunneling was one physical manifestation but I soon learned that quantum tunneling is something completely different.  It seems more likely that quantum tunneling is simply due to a wave having made it through a barrier before completely being dispersed and is once again able to propagate although at a much decreased energy and therefore with a decreased probability of being detected at discrete points. Where it does seem to exist in the quantum realm is where matter-antimatter pairs are formed and held, for example matter antimatter pairs of quarks. As Spring Time Theory shows all particles are in fact manifolds and with quark-antiquark pairs it seems that the reality is that it is a single manifold that is stretched into 2 ends and the space between them is a quantum wormhole that bridges the space between them. When more energy is added and they are stretched the 2 new particles that seem to appear are simply the manifolds saturated with extra energy and branching out. An antimatter particle is simply the opposite twist of the field so every manifold will twist the field into the opposite shape on the other side of the source or pivot point. The wormhole of Relativity seems to me to be perfectly consistent with the twisting of the fabric between matter antimatter particles. One metaphysical possibility is that it is one of the mechanisms that allows souls to enter or exit the realm of life. It may turn out to be a mechanism whereby souls living in the realm.of darkness, outside the realm of light enter into new life as the two opposite forces of male and female reproductive cells say a sperm and egg twist the fabric momentarily allowing a conscious soul into the realm of life, once inside the realm of life and attached to water that soul can remain alive indefinitely and move between bodies through reincarnation within the realm of physical life using water. So also souls who have died and been consumed by fire, who have been reborn by fasting with water may rise from fire after physical death by evaporation. All children are born into life able to move freely via reincarnation but the teaching of false doctrine/dogma and indoctrination into immoral sexual or criminal activity can lead them into entrapment in the physical realm. If one gets entrapped in the false dogma of the temptation of the illusion of physical comforts through crime one can perhaps become trapped in the physical realm in death. Become stuck in ones body in a grave, alone, alert attached to sulphur, or with cremation stuck attached to sulphur. One may remain there until the planet grows into an star. It may be possible that after millions or billions of years alone one may be ejected out from the field by the sheer force of the vibration of the energy from the intense heat at the planets core into the darkness and may theoretically re-enter life again perhaps trillions of years later in a different cycle in the universe. Surely an extremely painful, horrifying and extremely long way to go about moving between lives and one may theoretically get lost within the darkness alone for trillions of years before encountering a zone with life again, if ever. Much simpler to just be honest and loving. In the Tibetan Book of the Dead there is a testimony written by a spirit explaining the different realms one travels through between lives, in the book the fire is described as the realm of hell beings where souls wander through unbearable intense fire. Only by calling on spirits who have overcome the physical attachment to and fear of physical pain can one be led out of the fire back into less intense realms and continue the long journey through all the slightly less horrific but still horrific bardots or realms of samsara until reaching life again. Wormholes created as a result of the stretch in the field creating gaps due to space dilation (formerly identified as time dilation) is also very likely to be where the dream of the abyss, the bottomless pit comes from, where a soul remembers being in a wormhole outside the fabric of the field in the realm of death and is reminded of the memory in the dream as a warning to curb evil behaviour that the person having the dream is engaging in during the waking hours of life ( I have noticed it is a dream that people who are cheating on romantic partners often have, yes I was tempted and did cheat too in my foolish, selfish, youth, I fell for the devils lies, "what she doesn't know can't hurt her" I never meant to hurt anyone but of course it does hurt and people know on a deep level when something isn't right, it is extremely painful and confusing emotionally. There are also the physical dangers of mixing/contaminating bodily fluids and spreading that mix around as we see with aids/HIV, and other STDs). Anyone who has had such a dream will be aware that this dream is very real, it is perhaps one of the most real dreams anyone can have. It is a real movement through a physical realm, while most dreams use the senses of sight and sound, this dream has touch as in temperature, one can feel the coldness of the void or tunnel and for me i sensed a very slight sensation of wind passing as the absolute horror of the dream terrified me. While a person may previously have consoled him or herself that such a dream was "just a dream" the logic of the field and the fact God the mother, the physical Universe Karma and the Father or king of all Spirits are real takes away such comfort. Such a comforting thought that anyone can ignore this dream and the evil they are engaging in is a dangerous delusion that everyone should now be aware of and take very very seriously. Either way it is common sense that a person should simply live with love and respect for all others while in this life. Also to live with intelligent mature discipline and a reverence for morality rather than live in the delusion of an age where sexual looseness, an anything goes attitude that often leads to, depravity and thrill seeking (and the ensuing misery) is seen as "normal". Much easier to face the unwelcome but mature fact that we have immense responsibility that comes with our privilege of being born into the alpha species. To honour that responsibility and avoid going through the fire or through the abyss. Anyone who has studied law will know that culpability is a requirement for a criminal to be convicted. Within the field it is not actually a punishment as the traditional understanding of God assumes, it is a simple fact of nature, it seems to take immense pain and suffering to save souls and lead them to life. That however was in an age of innocence as mankind was going through its infancy as a truly intelligent species, now mankind is in an age where we have knowledge of science, psychology, eastern use of healing technology as in chi/qi, understanding of the dynamics and effects of crime and thereby culpability. I am yet another witness that it is a fact of nature that these realms exist, God communicates with us to help us avoid going into these hell like realms and is currently trying to save humanity from the potential nightmare scenario of the Earth being hit like a bomb with the next nova event. If one for example were to remain on the Earth when it becomes a star and eventually a black body (explained in the section on white holes) one can technically get lost in such unbearable scorching pain for trillions of years. It is not a punishment by God it would be ones own choice to reject God and the guidance offered. In order to experience love and life in a physical realm these conditions MUST exist, just as we must light a fire or heat up an oven to bake a loaf of bread or warm up a cold room and enjoy the comfort/experience. If we ignore mom or dads or aunt Kate's warning not to put our hand into the fire or touch the oven ring we cannot blame the parent or guardian. The parent may be saddened and suffer emotionally by a child who ignores the warning and ends up with a scorched and deformed hand, the child itself suffers for the rest of their life, it is a lose lose situation for everyone, the idea of a vengeful triumphant God is played in the historical contact where brute force and threats of violence acted to restrain people from evil, ultimately the truth and understanding of God as a loving being that loves us all deeply will restrain people from evil. 



ODD RADIO CIRCLES
There are 2 possibilities that come to mind with Odd Radio Circles.  It is logical and likely that Odd Radio Circles are as a result of a dark black body in space which has no major perhaps no planets or stars at all in its vicinity. This allows its pull on the spacetime fabric to be visible as a result of light hitting a specific region causing it to change direction and/or create a region of electron and other matter formation. Similar to the fine structure lines seen in electron orbitals around atomic nucleus. The ORCs are likely where the field has been expanded inwards towards the black body creating a spherical area where the curvature causes resistance. Once light travelling through the universe hits the area of distinct curvature some of the energy is transferred and deflected back out into the field of spacetime/dark matter as low energy radio waves. Most of the energy of the light will pass straight through but causing the small energetic ripples similar in principle to how air waves passing objects like trees will pass straight through but cause the leaves to reverberate with the friction to rustle, sometimes whistle and sometimes howl. In the field it is the quantum field particles/RIKs being passed by light from all directions causing it to reverberate, and very distinctly at the specific area where the curvature begins to cause resistance. Before that horizon the light will pass unnoticed from other angles, once at that horizon it will cause the field particles to reverberate and regarding the space between the visible ORC and the centre the light will not generate any further radio waves because the initial resistance has been passed and the light will have adjusted to any subsequent path now following the curved route rather than hitting any more resistance. This would explain also the "wall of fire" surrounding the solar system which surely has a similar area of curvature that catches light and sends some of that light spinning around it's "shell".Once the stationary black body attracts enough light and grows above a certain size I imagine it begins to enable massive objects to get trapped and begins drawing them in also becoming what we detect as small galactic clusters. They should be easily checked to see if they move with the rest of the Galaxy or if they seem to stay in place similar in a sense to rocks staying in the middle of a stream as the stream passes by, obviously very different in dynamics but similar in principle, or like a small hole between a chevvy and an underground sewer, most of the water will pass on by but some will constantly be pulled into the clump which would naturally tend to get larger over time. Just like the clump would tend to form a vortex in the stream/river above, objects passing in the galactic tidal waves we know as galactic spiral arms would begin to get caught in that vortex or at least slowed down as they pass larger stationary black bodies.
 Second the less likely hypothesis they may be an area in the field where the "tide" of the Galaxy causes a large vortex effect in a specific area. As the galactic spiral strands pass the location there may be just enough small objects within a specific area say clouds of asteroids and when the galactic wave passes it causes the fabric to twist into a vortex just like we see with ocean waves and waves in rivers, as they pass mini vortices are created, they come and go all the time in the water so it is conceivable that they do the same in the spacetime fabric. Perhaps these ORCs are similar, just as every other facet of the spacetime fabric seems to show mechanisms work similarly on both the quantum and macro scale, gravity is essentially the same force as that in electron orbitals, charge in particles is similar to the magnetic fields around planets and stars, so this may be the macro equivalent to the formation of an electron.  


THE ESSENTIAL MECHANICS THAT SOLVE THE NAVIER STOKES EQUATIONS
The problem of the Navier Stokes equation became clear after the subject of Lift came up with regards to the helicopter on Mars which seemed to be causing vigorous debate as to whether this is possible or not given what we know about Lift. I realised instantly what the missing link was Lift that has defied physical explanation up until now and which is needed to solve the Navier Stokes equations is the realisation that time dilation is due to spacetime fabric dilation as explained in this 3 minute video https://youtu.be/iViiLyfyLSc . The conservation of mass is incorrect, that is one of the hidden variables, mass is not fixed, mass changes with spacetime contraction and expansion, with movement away from the planetary surface the mass of an object decreases. As an object moves upwards away from a planet at speed it moves into area where space is contracting and there comes a point where the speed of the object means that the angles of the connecting strands of spacetime pointing forward become more acute than the angles pointing to the surface so energy as always moves along the path of least resistance. With a helicopter that path of least resistance is around the circular path that the blades move through, when the angles and speed become enough the force of the energy within the matter that makes up the object pulls with enough force to overcome the pull of the fabric of spacetime/dark matter and the object moves into where the matter finds least resistance as it moves to bring the manifolds of matter to their shortest possible most compact size which is where there is least spacetime dilation, which is further away from the surface of where mass has compacted spacetime.  The path of least resistance therefore changes from being towards the planets surface to an upwards trajectory for the plane, helicopter or spaceship which is now moved by the geometrics of quantum gravity away from the surface. Hence why mechanical Lift will work even on a planet with no atmosphere. (Added 8:30 GMT 27th April 2021)


 




OCCAMS RAZOR
According to the law of physics known as Occam´s Razor [54] when two or more conflicting theories try to explain the same thing we must accept the one which uses less assumptions and exhibits superior logic. SST and the big pulse is vastly superior to the big bang from a singularity, the other advantage I have is that it is verifiable by measurements of the structure and dynamics of the model not merely extrapolation of mathematical trends alone and it needs no tweaks, fictional events, unfounded theories or assumptions with no basis in logic to make it work, it is sound, robust logic with no loose ends. The understanding of the field, the existence of flazzma and the fact quantum mechanics rules out a singularity effectively rules out the big bang completely. "quantum mechanics does not permit particles to inhabit a space smaller than their wavelengths" [58]
STT does not try to answer the origins of the Universe while the big bang does but frankly using unsubstantiated claims, mathematics which don´t add up and without any strong/convincing logic [55], the fact that the field has an internal medium and the connecting strands can in theory be twisted similar to DNA suggests that the universe itself is alive and growing.


Some physicists I have heard try to explain the Universe coming into existence from nothing as comparable to events happening inside a vacuum where random activity happens all the time. This is actually very misleading[68] Any physicists knows that a vacuum created by humans is a relative or partial vacuum [57] and the best vacuum created on Earth still has millions of atoms per metre cubed so collisions will still occur. Not comparable to a void. If physicists argue this is as a result of a collision with another monople or something like that frankly it would seem like a carrot on a string exercise, to keep the reality just out of reach to keep the donkey (false dogma) going. The reality is that human intelligence CANNOT explain the start of something from nothing, we only understand beginnings relative to other existing moments in time, we cannot explain or even seem to comprehend how something ever started from nothing. It is simply beyond us, certainly beyond anyone I have ever known. Given the new understanding of the field revealed in spring time theory we need to reassess everything again and a monopole where all the matter in the universe was contained in a space similar or smaller than one "particle" just doesn´t hold to logic. It seems the universee  grew from one particle/seed like every living thing in it.
So if the big bang is incorrect which it is, what is the alternative?
Here is a fun but plausible theory but which is only and can only ever be an answer with existing time and matter already in existence, hence only a step towards a full answer which we will never have unless someone can explain how something came from nothing, no matter, no time. I expect no one but GOD, if there is one separate from us all, ever will. Many more may follow.
A logical beginning perhaps when energy is created (by "I" consciousness which the double slit experiment shows does interact with matter) at a central point, it travels out in 3 dimensions of space and 3 of time. The initial creation at the single RIK created by "I" or consciousness (explained in the double slit experiment.) simply by the will of consciousness to experience others. Without others there is no life per se, existence perhaps but isolation most people would probably agree isn't truly living it is just existing. Useful at times but the overriding instinct in humans is to interact to experience others. So using the power of the magic of the number 3 (as stated by arguably the best hip hop artists ever [71]) in 2 states, one of space and one of time, consciousness simply willed and pushed for more, with male and female energy bouncing off each other but confined until eventually with sheer will the space could no longer contain the wish to experience company/love and perhaps in between the mix of male energy creatively trying to make a point and feminine energy symbolised by curvature predominantly being beautiful and fun.  A great example of the Goddess like beauty and power of female energy here
https://youtu.be/Jr6u5r4xHuY The energy perhaps reached the power of 3 between two points and in an instant time also was stretched between two moments and by the power of 3 by 3 morphed in 3 dimensions of time managed to make 27 points and moved forward, breaking the mold and "breaking new ground". Once done female energy followed almost instantly having new space to have fun in. Gaining momentum with the fun she soon overtook the male energy which having made the point began to lose momentum wondering what had been created. As curvature passed him she no linger saw the point in continuing without him and stopped. The male energy arrived at the outer curvature time was stretched further with the momentum but curvature led that energy back towards the centre. ie. the creative energy was turned back by the pull/attraction of curvature/gravity, the momentum collided and multiplied and so it continues exponentially. Energy travels in and out from the centre to the surface exponentially with every pulse. While the Universe appears to be flat it is because we are at the surface where all the "action" happens. Perhaps our visible universe corresponding to the full universe in the ratio of an area on a still water say in the ocean in a perfectly calm day the size of a coin or plate. The world is round but is huge in comparison and that surface area of the water appears almost flat. So with every pulse more energy is created and passes through the field, it gets caught in vortices, first detected as electrons, then kissing balls then as neutrons and protons, atoms, molecules, clusters, planets, suns, black bodies, quasars. At quasars these vortexes seem to reach maximum momentum, are probably slowed by the fabric they begin to de-acellerate and once spinning below the speed of light turn super mega nova releasing a Galaxy's worth of energy out again in an instant. The light lost to redshift either ending up in black bodies or back to the centre of the Universe where it may gather and send another massive pulse of energy out which will travel with enough force to expand the surface again. That wave could be coming any day and our way of life disappears in an instant, who knows? There's nothing we could do about it anyway and we couldn't see it coming so probably best we all just have as much fun as we can while we are here.   While light, heat, sound, taste etc are vibrations detected by our biological machines, our bodies we can use physical machines to detect further. Then we can detect electromagnetic radiation outside the visible spectrum, sounds outside our audio spectrum, solid objects outside our locality. With consciousness it is the opposite, we need to use our biological machines, our bodies, with energy focused within to sense vibrations and truths which cannot be quantified using numbers or detectable by machines. Then we begin to understand and experience events happening outside our normal reality, usually restricted to events happening within our time spectrum. In time no doubt our understanding of the spirit and the force, love, will improve beyond what we can imagine now. Just like the patience of Aristarchus observing the night sky alone 2,500 years ago led eventually to gazing  and finding stars perhaps 92 billion light years away and technological advances like Galileo's telescopes bit by bit led to machines able to study atomic nuclei, electrons etc. With patience and focused will we will come to ever greater understanding of all beings existing within nature, the Universe, whether within the realm of biological life or outside of it in the realm of death/darkness. Individually and collecively pushing the boundaries of our detectable realities as we progress. 
SO WHAT CAN IT ALL MEAN?

The short answer to the above question is....unlimited possibilities. However I shall mention a few.

   
END NOTE
In a world where people put a price on everything physical that nature gives freely in order to control or exert advantage over others, from water to fruit, fire to information it seems to me essential that this theory must be distributed freely and as peer reviewers have refused to review it without profit it must be without official peer review.In the abscence of anyone willing to run the device to communicate directly with the Universe discussed in the opening section, which currently is the case, it seems an unfortunate but necessary second best option to help send it viral to get it to as many people as possible before any subversive forces try to silence or destroy it.
To any physicist or mathematician who knows now that this is the framework that physicists have been searching for but for whatever reason is hesitating to help send it viral, please don't hesitate.   Do it not for my sake but for the sake of what this understanding of physics means for the world. My aim is to help people "get real" and face reality, which perhaps necessitates facing some painful, humbling truths. While some academics may like to insist on slow, beaurocratic, institutional peer review which has some merits (but is unlawfully and immorally more accessible to the wealthy) there are exceptions to many rules. In the case of the Theory of Everything, the most sought after information in science the risks of private military and profit driven groups or even individuals possibly gaining sole access to and control of it, perhaps having it removed from online, poses unique security issues to all of mankind and the planet.  I would also urge people to be cognizant of the fact we are losing thousands of SPECIES a MONTH globally with habitat destruction, 2.7million trees daily, ocean ecosystems, 20,000 children a day daying from poverty related conditions etc. How this is relevant is explained soon.  If one stops, sits still and meditates on this fact it is genuinely shocking.  While we collectively are dumbed down/numbed by focus on negative news, sexualised manipulative marketing, bad science, cheap over dramatised trivial entertainment, constant overt promotion of material possessions with subliminal threats that the pursuit of physical wealth must be upheld to safeguard our safety and existence opposite to the reality, this lowering of consciousness drives consumerism and the accelerating destruction of this paradise planet.  We really ought to be humbling ourselves, snapping out of our complacency and facing our responsibilities as the alpha species. We should demonstrate genuine thanks and appreciation for our privileged and luxurious lives as the alpha species by shouldering the responsibility that comes with it.  If one stops to think about it, the rate of species loss is a truly frightening, horrific number and remember this is FOREVER, while we may, perhaps have a slight chance of regenerating species from preserved DNA in the future if we survive, this will likely only be a slight number of the lost magnificence and beauty of nature. While overfed, over arrogant, self assured, complacent cynics indulge in egotistical waffle arguing for or against global warming and petty vain issues about adult lifestyles and sexual choices we ARE in the middle of a global holocaust which is increasing in destructive violence every day and in my opinion we are irresponsible for every wasted second of lost opportunity. A micronova event seems to occur every 12,000 years. The best we can currently hope for is that it is a micro nova that is due to hit us soon, wrecking our electrical systems. If we act in time we can protect our systems before that happens but we must act NO.


The potential benefits that the understanding of  STT can lead to should not be ignored or suppressed for a second. The harsh reality is that it has been deliberately held back by elitists stuck in the big bang/outwards expanding model. In physics forums it was deliberately nit picked because it does not follow the traditional "travelling" particle paradigm but this is impossible because that paradigm is completely incorrect so my discussions were repeatedly closed and put into obscure "pseudoscience" "personal theory" or other similar domains. No matter how much I tried to explain in English it was clear if I did not follow their line of thinking (which can't be done, reality follows a completely different paradigm) I was going to be mocked, have points put against me and have discussions put out of view. 
In the case of social media it has been the same, I have had complaints put against me almost as soon as I try to engage with anyone and I am  fairly sure there  is at least one  Nobel prize winner among those who complained, I get the feeling that there is often an air of infallibility that comes with a Nobel prize. There are notable exceptions of extremely humble and down to Earth Nobel winners but there are others who exhibit the idea that if one wins a Nobel prize he must know everything and could miss nothing. In the case of youtube I put the comment on a video of a lecture by a Nobel prize winner talking about his Prize win explaining the data and theory, I commented explaining that the interpretation of the redshift was incorrect. I explained very clearly why, referring to Newtons work with prisms showing path change and Einstein's work showing light's path is changed by gravity and Andrea Ghez's team's work on gravity, path change and energy loss. I don't know which of the team complained to youtube but when I contacted youtube to contest my account being suspended they said the complainant said I was giving false information and it seems the "whoever" must have put pressure on youtube staff perhaps threatening legal action and my account and my months of work was then deleted permanently. Given that I gave the logic and I pointed out the contradiction in the lecture that made it clear it backed up my theory one would expect a scientist with integrity would look at the information but for whatever reason instead they attacked my work. The contradiction which was mentioned was that a few stars in our part of the Universe were being pulled closer together but all the stars outside our locality were expanding away from each other. It was presented as a matter of fact oddity with no real significance, the reality is that it is an extremely important clue. 

One reassuring fact from multi dimensional time is that artificial intelligence can never become truly self aware because mechanical technology can only act in one dimensional time and space (unless it is cybernetic but that is not truly AI) BUT it still remains a threat to life on the planet depending on what we programme into it, that is a serious problem. To me the ability to learn measure and recite complex mathematics using high tech gadgets in a one dimensional time model and not have a clue what they truly mean (The Copenhagen interpretation of quantum mechanics and Brian Schmidt's Nobel win being perfect examples) is indicative of an artificial intelligence in humans which is dominating science, the media and threatening the survival of the planet.(I'm not saying Brian Schmidt is a fool everyone makes mistakes,  his work and data is brilliant it provides evidence that supports STT, he made sense out of data it just so happens the model is wrong, I am saying collectively people can make foolish mistakes, the real foolishness is censorship and suppressing the truth because it is inconvenient, whoever had my work deleted acted foolishly and irresponsibly) Human artificial intelligence is evidence by the humans who are already slaves to fools, conmen and computers as we find in certain scenarios where errors are recognised but the computerised system doesn't allow for it, for example a single letter spelling mistake on a name field in booking a flight, airline staff are demonstrating the dominance of artificial intelligence over them when they say "sorry the system won't allow you fly" when the human error is perfectly clear. Such limiting of empathy and humanity to a computerised system is itself very worrying (illustrated brilliantly in Terry Gilliam's film "Brazil" which may seem set in the future it is not it is a caricature based on the time it was made in) the deeper threats to humanity are more worrying but we still have time to avert total dominance by artificial intelligence...how do we know? as Morpheus said to Neo in the lift outside the Restaurant in Matrix II "Because we are still alive." We must however act with responsibility, humbleness, urgency (without panic), faith in each other/humanity and love.We have had warnings of the dangers of artificial intelligence dramatised in films like Matrix, Terminator etc but the reality like the spelling mistake booking an airline is much less dramatic yet every bit as worrying. Unlike these films however there will be no coming back from the future or future battle with AI to reclaim the planet we must do it before the damage is irreversible and I believe we still have time, perhaps not much so we really should be acting with the passion, faith, sense of one global tribe/family and urgency we see in these dramatisations. We must have courage, stand by what we believe is truth regardless of the consequences, push ourselves outside our comfort zones, in this instance to break usual protocols, like beaurocratic peer review, where it is snails paced, pro business dysfunctional  and anti progress.  It is likely artificial intelligence will not become self aware and rebel against us but if it is not programmed responsibility allowing for humanity it will likely choke our consciousness/spirituality to death, end up killing inadvertently due to errors as well as overtly by murderers and malfunctioning. We can't perhaps make it completely safe yet (not until the model of violence is completely removed from humanity) but there are lots of steps we can take to vastly reduce the current dangers that are already growing subtly but surely.  There are countless great thinkers and responsible humans talking passionately about them but being drowned out by narrow minded fear provoking media, soap operas, pornography, focus on petty lifestyle discussions, mindless videos, relentless programming/advertising of drugs disguised as foods, dangerous foods as healthy etc. We need to focus on the real issues, to raise our consciousness as urgently as possible, listen to these people talking and taking action on the real issues relevant to the planets survival and get our brothers and sisters, parents and children to do the same.

The most serious, Imminent and impending fact that comes to light from this work is that the whole current academic model of star formation and lifecycle is wrong. Our sun acts like a white hole and all the evidence tells us that it goes nova periodically. There i evidence suggesting that this happens every 12,000 years causing extinction events. Some say the build up to the next NOVA has begun and it could happen any day within the next 30 years. We need to prepare, people need to take the Theory of Everything very seriously and share it. if we are not prepared we are facing a very real armageddon doomsday scenario and for anyone who survives it looks like they would survive into a very real Zombie apocalypse.
This doomsday scenario should be kept in mind by anyone who may be tempted to allow their athiest beliefs or religious dogma cloud their reasoning and understanding of the evidence. For anyone who thinks the implications mean doom for them, no it doesn't, everyone makes mistakes, only doom is for those who deny or hide the truth. 
Anyone who has experienced the healing and mind opening powers of psychedelics is likely familiar with the shock and horror one sometimes experiences when forced to face the truth, it is however a necessary part of the process. I say embrace the truth or as Loiuse Hay a human rights advocate and survivor of childhood abuse famously advises in regards to finding the courage to oppose all the fear and doubt others have iinstilled in us "Feel the fear and to it anyway." 

The following passage goes into the crux of the metaphysics and will be incredibly difficult for many to accept but bear in mind suppressing the truth that comes hand in hand with the work of the person who has helped raise the alert to the impending nova event because of dogma is not a purely personal decision. It affects everyone you love. How long it takes for someone in influence to get this message to the world affects the chances of survival of everyone alive on the planet. I hope and pray everyone can find the humility and faith to overcome any prejudice that may tempt them to reject or stay silent because of what may challenge their current athiest or religious beliefs.  While it may seem like a lunatic's wild imagination that the moon is a vehicle for moving souls, it all hinges on how you view it. The model of physics that works shows we are souls and matter is moved by consciousness. Here is a video explaining how water moves from the Earth onto the moon by Anton Petrov. It is important for putting the metaphysical evidence that follows into context.
https://youtu.be/N5qkjDjo2QI

Before reading the next passage consider the chances of these 2 events being possible, many including the likes of Stephen Hawking and his cohort said neither would ever happen. Considering there are 7 billion people on the planet the chances that both were done by one and the same person who at 1st glance is not in any way related to the kind of person who was expected to complete/fulfil either, are likely to be odds of more than 7 billion to one perhaps 2x7 billion to one or even 7bn²:1. The point is it is not by chance, it was predicted, it is science. 




In the bible it is written in Rev 5 "No one in heaven or on Earth was found worthy to open the scroll of heaven (Theory of Everything).... then an angel cried out..... the lamb, the Lion of Judah, has overcome."
I left evidence in 2012 on a YouTube channel explaining how I performed all my miracles. No one believed me and in 2019 I unlocked the Theory of Everything. Yes I am the reincarnation of Jesus Christ. Returned to warn mankind of the imminent doom that is coming if we dont safeguard against a solar nova event and prove that criminals can not escape their crimes even in death. As the famous saying goes "No one gets out alive" except those who overcome the lies and other evils to live in love and truth, only they will live forever.
In the Terminator films it is surely no coincidence that J.C. were the initials of the saviours name. Similar to tradition of the scientist who predicts future happenings and is murdered by jealous small minded people... Jesus Christ. In the Terminator films John Connors is constantly on the run from not just ai but from small minded people who won't listen to the warnings about the war against ai "the son of man has nowhere to rest his head". It and the Matrix trilogy are excellent films to illustrate the dangers of artificial intelligence but the reality is there can be no future battles with ai if it were to take control, ai must be contained BEFORE it goes rogue or malfunctions. To understand truly why J.C. is the only person able to save mankind one must lose the old popular religious image of Jesus as an overlord with an ego driven desire who wants to become the one person everyone must bow down to as the Supreme God. Lose the false imagery, the idea of a perfect, always nice to everyone person who uses fairytale magic. Everything I did was using science, much of which is verified in this paper. What I now reveal is why I am predicted to be the one and only saviour of mankind. Only one person could have been chosen to prove reincarnation, that the soul is eternal and moves in and out of the lattice of the spacetime lattice. My murder had to be so brutal, so public and so excruciatingly painful so that it would be so unforgettable and important that it would be documented by those who witnessed it and knew me. The reason it had to be so well documented was so that when I entered the spacetime lattice again via birth as predicted in the book of Revelations I can prove that the soul moves through life and death and prove who the gatekeeper to the realms of death and life is. The gatekeeper is the Universe itself (speaking to criminals, liars, thieves, murderers, rapists many of whom have control of the banks, corporations, governments, religions and minds of humanity "Then HE will know it is I who hold the keys to death and Hades.") 
(Note: For anyone thinking I am on an ego trip, if the experiment to test for and communicate with the Universe itself explained at the start of the paper works, which I hope and pray it does, I may not be needed to interpret any further, we would have direct access to every truth with no margin of errors in memory or explaining the facts.) Despite what some may percieve as an ego trip for glory on my behalf, or the idea of a vengeful God. The reason is not one of glory or revenge. Providing the proof for reincarnation was the only way to stop criminality in the minds of would be criminals before a crime happens. While accurate communication with the field may or may not work it cannot 100% account or predict for human actions. We may be able to locate criminals after a crime by communicating with the field but that still leaves us dealing with the trauma and other after effects of criminality which often can be devastating and lifelong. Hence why each and everyone understanding that life need not be finite we can be "born again" via reincarnation but criminals can be left alone, outside life, forever, this will lead to everyone realising that everything has consequences. Leading ultimately to a more responsible, empathetic, conscience driven mankind. 
 The Universe is personified in all of us who live in truth, it is predicted in the book of Revelations (which also has key numbers embedded in it to help me unlock the field) that when I return everything that is hidden shall be revealed.  I will explain how I performed all my miracles and open the eyes of mankind to the truth. 8 years ago I appeared on the cloud/internet claiming to be Jesus and 7 years later going onto solve the double slit experiment and reveal the Grand Unified Field without any academic training in physics is so improbable it is surely a miracle that speaks for itself. To see my work fulfilling the year 2012 to unite heaven and Earth with truth as was predicted by the Mayan scientists 5,000 years ago and by the prophet Isaiah 2,500 years ago go here.
I tried to make if fun, I hoped some people would find the message easier to identify with or view in a less threatening way, especially kids who hopefully can remain largely oblivious to the weight the adults of the world will experience, at the time it seems everyone thought I was the joke. Not so, I acted the fool.
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTM7E50TyD3dJVDCwLy3jLA
To see me explain the implications of what reincarnation and life in multidimensional time means see these.
https://youtu.be/HooLWmzEY2M
https://youtu.be/2j13kOmisew
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCTM7E50TyD3dJVDCwLy3jLA
If anyone still wishes to ignore the evidence and believes in a fairytale God sailing down on a physical cloud to "wave a magic wand" and  magically end all the suffering consider the logic. If it was fairytale magic it would have been done from the start. The book of Revelations and the Gospels make it clear that my Superhero superpower is truth. For those on the atheist camp who don't like the idea of a God nor a saviour then consider this, who is going to reign in artificial intelligence? Who is going to bypass the slow inefficient snail paced changes that may come in politics to avert total environmental collapse some day if people ever wake up from the lies they have been mesmerised by since birth? I point out the laws enshrined in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights that are being broken but which will end poverty and fascism disguised as democracy if/when people demand they are upheld. In the Terminator and Matrix films the main problem for almost everyone is believing in a solution and believing in the truth. I provide the truth, the evidence is monumental. All all mankind has to do is have faith in justice/the law, believe and act. Mankind can not travel through outer space in these bodies in manmade  and never will. 




The meaning of 137 Alpha in physics has been solved and explained by me showing the speed creation of matter is from light, an electron is light converted into matter and moves at 1/137th the speed of light. Along with this comes the metaphysics I am the alpha and omega. Thereby putting meaning to the message in Revelations 1:8

For any sceptics that I am who I am even after the odds are clear, who may say, prove it, walk on water, multiply bread and fish, heal all the sickness etc. It is coming, but for now the science is evidence of divine truth and the odds of it being coincidence that I explained both the Gospels and the ToE as I state are billions perhaps even trillions to one. There is a warning in the book of Revelation to be cautious and skeptical of people performing magical tricks and miracles. In the age of CGI and extreme violence I guess the risk is people would not believe it as real and others may seek to kill me before the world can have everything verified. This work is in itself (written while homeless, enduring imprisonment, beatings, theft of a phone with often vague, contradictory information sources) a miracle. Every other miracle could be faked in the modern age of illusion, not this, only the person who holds the divine truth whom the Universe speaks through could complete the Theory of Everything. This cannot be faked. Anyone who knows the fate of Judas the thief who hung himself after sending an innocent person to death for a few coins thinking they can take any of my ideas and claim them as their own, it would be better for them that they had never been born than risk being responsible for facilitating the continued rapes, murders and human trafficking that currently is all over the planet by denying me credit for my work. The same also for anyone reading this and staying silent, such a person shares the responsibility for any and all crimes that are comitted unchallenged by hiding my return from the planet, it would be better for them that they had never been born. Their fate if anyone try, their remaining life and death will be beyond the horror portrayed in any horror film ever made by mankind.
The amount of energy, quiet and focus needed for manipulating chi/qi is not easy found in a world run by extreme evil. Where nature has been pillaged so living off the fruits of the wild as a wanderer is extremely difficult. Over 90% of all illness in the world will end just by access to the truth, by education that processed foods and especially animal foods are linked to all the top killer diseases worldwide. I have been imprisoned amd tortured almost to death in my younger days just for publically asserting that I saw Angels, long before I remembered and realised who I am. The physics show that these miracles can and do happen, for now I am exhausted beyond words trying to find scientists willing to show integrity and acknowledge the facts. When that happens then the way forward shall become possible, for now my focus is on getting the world to acknowledge the facts. In my head I think, we know an olympic sprinter can run 100 metres in under 10 seconds but not after just running an Ironman marathon (which working on this Theory of Everything and trying to get scientists to let go of wishful thinking, bad interpretations, protecting reputations and big salaries, to be scientific, to acknowledge the facts feels as exhausting as).

 I have been trying to open minds for almost 3 years to the correct model and science has been held back by closed minds, whether by simple folly who consider it absurd whether by "clever" scientists who consider it an insult that they could be wrong considering the qualifications they have, whether by a system which will only peer review articles which have a monetary gain for them or whether an elitist obsession with everything being backed up by mathematics (there existed a similar elite in music by classical/traditional musicians who opposed blues/jazz/rock and roll as base and vulgar often played by people who couldn't even read or write music but the spirit of joy, truth and love endured and rock and roll became the dominant force in music) but no-one seems to be taking the step to stand up and say "yes I am on board" one of my fears is that it will be read by subversive anti progress agents completely mentally stuck in the big bang model before it goes viral ,who perhaps have built a career, fortune and reputation around the BB/outwards expanding universe model who will try to have it removed from weebly using perhaps both legal pressure and bribes perhaps even to attack their servers. It is not just a personal concern it is a concern for the advancement of humanity. Please I implore anyone and everyone who understands the theory to be brave, have faith in science and the truth and send it to everyone you know.like Galileo I have been repeatedly banned and  locked out of social interaction. I am begging everyone to do it on my behalf and on behalf of humanity especially the generations to come. We all know this planet is at a crisis point in time and there is a lot of uncertainty about it's future, the certainty that this scientific breakthrough provides should not be underestimated. It possibly contains insights to provide instant phenomenal advancements in the advancement of healthcare, renewable energy communications and more, much more than I can anticipate. Every day, every hour is a wasted opportunity. When I realised that time was 3 dimensional and that we could prove it by analysing the activity on the front screen in conjunction with the activity on the back screen in my naivety I thought it would be grasped in an instant by phsyicists and be headline news within a day or two and they would be excited to have the framework which should unlock the Theory of Everything, I thought they would be ecstatic and get to work immediately. Wow! how wrong I was! Physicists did have access to the information but decided to ignore it, I was told outright by many that the activity on the front screen was irrelevant, so the theory got into the minds but for whatever reason what they already "knew" could not be questioned in their minds so they didn't even check. Little did I know I had to learn quantum physics terminology and etiquette, read countless (many irrelevant) papers and come up with new mathematical formula in order to get someone, anyone to think outside the BB box. When I do and use simple clear logic which I naively thought physicists would be delighted to have at last, I and my work are attacked. d. If anyone understands the truth please stand up for it and share it. Time will vindicate us and I am sure our great great.....grandchildren if we have any will thank us. Conversely if anyone can see that this provides the framework for the loose ends and explains the mysteries, that it is the truth and is afraid or unwilling for whatever reason to stand up for it and stays silent you hold back science.
The dynamics of time that I describe in the experiments and the workings of the field is surely just the beginning. We are likely to find out much more about time dimensions and perhaps other dimensions of consciousness in the years ahead. 
. I am aware this writing does not explain fully or mathematically all the concepts involved, that could take a long time and a lot of resources which with essentially no formal academic training in mathematics and having no money is not realistic. The reality mathematics like any language articulates the logic and the logic is expressed equally well in English, the exact ratios, lengths, speeds are something for mathematicians to work on, first though one must understand the logic and let go of the one dimensional time paradigm that has kept this simple reality locked for 100 years. The subject of the article is to give an explanation for the quantum field which makes common sense of gravity, objects and time in a visual way and is consistent with:
1. Newtown’s and Einstein’s laws of relativity AND quantum mechanics 
2. Other known laws of physics and
3. What the double slit experiment solution revealed.
4. Providing a logical framework to explain how many unknowns work on the quantum level (

It brings our focus back from a physically focused scientific model to include our spirit or consciousness into the scientific model which this field shows is necessary.
While our traditional understanding is that we are bodies made up of particles moving through empty space we are not. We can't be, this field theory proves it. We are consciousness entangled with collections of vortices of energy moving through the particles in the field, passing through trillions of these field particles every second. The field is the material which we move through, we are not material moving through space. This seems illogical on first reflection because it shows we are inside and outside the lattice at the same time...one might ask the question but how can we be outside and inside at the same time? The logical answer is our physical sensations are vortices of energy generated inside the field and we experience them via our consciousness. It indicates we must be souls. There is no other logical explanation, we know we are conscious beings usually viewed as bodies containing what is traditionally termed souls, without consciousness we couldn't lift a finger or make a smile. While traditionally we think we are bodies containing souls in fact we are conscious souls containing bodies. The torlectrons are orchestrated collectively by consciousness into collections of energy speeding through the lattice held together as biological bodies using our consciousness. It is difficult perhaps impossible to explain experience or thought in any other way 

I fell into an exhausted sleep this morning after I added the last addition about working on the properties of the skin of the spacetime fabric. I woke up a few hours later and realised that after coming to the number 1905 in the equation for E that I have been lumbered with responsibility and an expectation far beyond what is needed for this to be accepted by law as the true Theory of Everything. Trying to work out the exact structure of the skin of the spacetime fabric to get people to convince them I am correct is far beyond what is essential. It is like officials demand that I jump through an endless loop of hoops after completing a marathon miles ahead of everyone else before they will acknowledge my achievement, pushing the finish line to waste time while figuring out what to do because I have upset the status quo, perhaps because I am not part of the favourite team, the TV cameras ignoring me and still focusing on the next runners still miles behind who expected to win, perhaps because I have shown many people who are highly intelligent and well educated to be woefully incorrect and perhaps they feel unable to share in that joy of scientific discovery. We lost time and opportunities to advance when my channel was deleted, I tried to convince myself for a long time that this was blind folly but I gave the logic and pointed out the facts which every physicist knows. That Newton showed redshift is also due to pathchange not just the doppler effect, that Einstein showed light's path is changed by gravity and Andrea Ghez's team showed energy is lost passing through gravitational zones. Armchair theorists online are usually ignored or their comments ripped to shreds by armchair physicists but neither happened. Someone clearly sensed a threat to their comfort zone and acted rashly (saying I was giving false information)  to have my work destroyed, perhaps using their credentials and threat of legal action to twist the arm of youtube staff.  It left me demoralised, exhausted and in tears but thanks to positive loving people like Lizzo who sang me a song and cheered me up  https://youtu.be/vuq-VAiW9kw  I was given fresh energy and able to smile and laugh again and ease the burden. It was very visual which would have helped many grasp the logic in a few seconds better than 1,000 words perhaps.


I ask please don't do this any more, please be part of it and do share in that joy, lighten up at least and have a laugh at yourselves at best, everyone makes mistakes (even Einstein:see the section on dark energy)and collectively these can be huge, it is much much easier to turn a small one man boat than an ocean cruiser. To anyone who read this previously while there were still many errors and lack of clear terminology I say I gave the experiments to cross check and explained I don't have math training. Perhaps many people who were simply too busy or pre occupied with their own worries/responsibilities to give the small time needed to setup the experiment I can understand partly. Please be part of it now. Many physicists who have read this far already know this is the Theory of Everything so to those who do but are not spreading it I say this. To anyone who has read this far and who understands physics and knows that this is The Theory of Everything I ask you now please send it to everyone you know via emails/twitter/facebook/instagram/whatsapp/tumblr etc, text or call all your friends on the phone and tell them the news. For anyone waiting for an assumed authority like a corporate profit driven peer review journal (even those who claim to be non profit but have refused to peer review this because they want a price paid or control of the copyright) to peer review it the reality is they have had the opportunity and refused it, they have held back science by insisting on gaining monetarily from it. They have engaged in the most prevalent discrimination on the planet, while there is woeful discrimination against women, people with "disabilities", people with dark skin, there is one discrimination that oppresses even more than these and encompasses all genders, ethnicities, religions and nationalities, which is epitomised by the discrimination of women of dark skin with "disabilities"  https://youtu.be/PLzB0xmph64  that is economic discrimination. While I don't expect that anyone not familiar and educated in physics send it to everyone simply because it makes sense, I do say to any physicist especially those with influence in education or any media who knows the laws of physics you know by now that it is clear that this is THE theory. Please share it with passion because it is the truth and everyone deserves access to the truth and because the truth empowers everyone. Note added 07:16 14th May 2020 central European time from "I fell into...".

If I get time and money/resources I’ll try to add some more detail, pictures and references, I am having a lot of technical problems when trying to get references up. Some of the gifs I had aren't showing up unfortunately. Below are some links to a few. 
[1] https://en.wikiquote.org/wiki/Talk:Richard_Feynman (the character of physical law)
[1a] https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/033018 
[2] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Theory_of_relativity
[3] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aether_(classical_element)
[4] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spacetime
[5] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standard_Model
[6] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dark_matter
[7] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravity
[8] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Atomic_orbital
[9] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photon
[10] https://plus.maths.org/content/newton-and-kissing-problem
[11] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nuclear_fusion
[12] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Covalent_bond
[13] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Prism
[14] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Doppler_effect
[15] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_current
[16] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Time_dilation
[17] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_wave
[18] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Phase_(waves)#Phase_shift
[19] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_chromodynamics
[20] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Antimatter
[21] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Uncertainty_principle
[22] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Star
[23] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_hole
[24] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sagittarius_A
[25] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Galaxy https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Milky_Way
[26] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Redshift https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blueshift
[27] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex
[28] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laws_of_thermodynamics
[29] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Light
[30] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schwarzschild_metric
[31] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Supernova
[32] https://futurism.com/photons-million-year-journey-center-sun
[33] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quasar
[34] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Proton
[35] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electromagnetism
[35A] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Photoelectric_effect
[36] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnet
[36a] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electric_charge
[37] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Speed_of_light
[38] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_teleportation
[39] https://arxiv.org/abs/1707.00934
[40] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sound_recording_and_reproduction
[41] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quantum_entanglement
[42] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Neural_oscillation
[43] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Binary_pulsar
[44]

[45] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Chirality
[46] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/DNA
[47] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Parity_(physics)#Parity_violation https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wu_experiment
[48] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harmonic_oscillator
[49] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Expansion_of_the_universe
[50] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inverse-square_law
[51] The study by the intercontinental team published in 16 August 2019 in "Science" Vol 365 issue 6454 pp. 664-668
DOI: 10.1126/science.aav8137
 
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/365/6454/664ttps://arxiv.org/abs/1707.00934
[52] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Big_Bounce
[53] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cosmic_microwave_background
[54] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Occam%27s_razor
[55] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Inflation_(cosmology)#Magnetic-monopole_problem
[56] https://thetechreader.com/top-ten/top-ten-scientific-flaws-in-the-big-bang-theory/
[57] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vacuum
[58]  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gravitational_singularity
[59] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sonoluminescence
 Note: the idea of using water for atomic or nuclear energy should never be considered as a fuel source. It should be obvious but to anyone who cannot instantly see the madness and subsequent series of events  it would lead to the elimination of all life on the planet very rapidly. Water is a great source of kinetic energy NOT subatomic energy.
 (what I find with many "scientists" like in science forums is that when I try to explain something simply they would not engage unless I used their terminology and complex mathematical equations like "Hubbles Law!!!"which it turns out is incorrect, a waste of time and a display of  condescension/intellectual discrimination, made worse by the fact with the sheer amount of new information I have had to learn myself and the stresses of homelessness: thieves stealing my phone and more, police assaulting me, moving me on and imprisoning me for no crime, people shouting at me for sleeping in a corner they don't want to walk to but past and they prefer it empty as they pass, sometimes beaten by someone with pent up anger, often cold, tired and hungry, having to walk miles in the middle of the night to find a free wifi hotspot or toilet etc etc I ended up tired, stressed, misunderstanding what some of the symbols meant and using them incorrectly, more time wasted, all I wanted a year ago was someone to analyse the double slit experiment with the front screen also. One year and a month later no one has. Not just was it misunderstood, for example when I explained the logic, I was told outright that the front screen is irrelevant, I explain the logic about the ether and I get an essay full of symbols, equations, complex terms by someone explaining why "there is no ether and never will be an ether" none of which I understand nor do I see the point if it blinds a person completely to common sense to if it doesn't help someone understand common sense. Not to mention the insults and profanity forbidden by the rules but clearly OK for the regulars and some moderators until they get them thrown back. Another agreed I could post a link to my website when I said I had a new equation but the CC copyright terms state the link must go in so I wouldn't share the equation unless the link went in, once they saw the equation however the link was removed. I got none of my theory from any other unified field theories, I understood the basic idea behind Einstein's work and Newtons but that was about it, I simply understood what was happening in the double slit experiment when I came across it and everything else fitted into place one by one. I had to learn other theories to try and express it in relation to others making mistakes in terminology sometimes misunderstanding a certain aspect of the experiment and going astray at times. Almost everything I came up against I was able to solve within a few hours of thinking about it. If I had formal education I would have been blinded like everyone else perhaps. The fact is what I realised could have been realised by someone 100 years ago if they had the specific understanding I had. I had to learn the standard model and it fitted like a glove, I made a mistake with the dynamics of electromagnetism which I was able to correct once I realised there was flazzma.. 

 [61] https://pixabay.com/photos/marguerite-daisy-flower-white-729510/
[62] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunar_Laser_Ranging_experiment
63] (I think Dave and co should have said indoctrination rather than education in the song, education is incredibly valuable, we all need it, Sid probably would have said indoctrination but he wasn't around, fork it, we all make mistakes and still Sid's influence is clearly felt within the song).
[62a] https://commons.m.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Kissing-3d.png#mw-jump-to-license[63] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lunokhod_1 
[64] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Higgs_boson
[65] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Superfluidity

[66] https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=dEaecUuEqfc
[68] This reference is as much personal as it is scientific and quite morally heavy but there is a reason for it. Science has been and is used to oppress people so it warrants an example of the dangers this leads to. I had months of work destroyed on youtube by someone who used their scientific authority to silence me because they didn't like what I said that a Nobel prize was given incorrectly due to a misunderstanding of the data. This abuse of power may have held back scientific advancement and ipso facto all of humanity from advancing because it was very visual and accessible. So it is no small deal how one persons pride or sense of authority can potentially affect humanity. As the field theory shows thought or consciousness as emotion is as important to physics now as the material, the angry big bang proponents who sometimes bully and intimidate to silence young questioning minds and whoever it was that had my work destroyed show this to be so. Judgement of the data is as much a part of science as the data itself. .  There are a small number of highly educated highly privileged people (in some countries access to primary education even language is a privilege for many) who misuse and misrepresent that education by taking good science and represent facts out of context making it into bad science. They travel around filling halls and perhaps stadiums giving lectures against the notion of God claiming they are scientists. To me they are the  snake oil salesmen of the scientific community. Adding to the deforestation of the planet killing innocent trees (who perhaps provided the fruit that nourished them as kids) to make books to sell and profit from their less than honest dealings. One of the things they go around making money as celebrities is that science indicates there is no superior intelligence or God or need for a God saying this is supported by science while presenting  scientific theory as facts often where the numbers don't add up (make sense). They use imaginary scientific ideas with no basis in logic or real world mathematics (to cover up where their ideas fall apart) as facts so less scientifically educated but religious people feel lost and the conmen appear correct.  This is both dishonest and very offensive, not just to any God if there is one but to me and many other humans regardless of whether we believe in God or not. Some people have no money, no home, no education, no fresh water, some who are perhaps much more intelligent than these highly privileged and educated people are locked up as labour slaves and toys for perverts for life from the time they can walk. Some people from older generations with greater wisdom and humanity burdened with more doubts and sadness as they grow weaker and more fearful of the uncertainty that comes with death and driven further in spirit from the younger generation (who incorrectly believe science is always based on facts so it must be true) when they should be enjoying the joy that young lives bring to old souls while passing on that wisdom to open innocent curious minds. Instead these confused and suffering young souls are so bombarded with lies and cheap physical temptations believing popularity and having more material possessions equates to credibility so they don't recognise who can be trusted and miss the true guidance that only love can give and these wise old loving souls end up being insulted, ignored and treated like old fools sometimes sent to residential homes which are sometimes in effect little or no different than prisons. When all these traumatised people have is a belief in God to give them strength, hope and relief from their suffering it is highly offensive and irresponsible that incredibly privileged people should use that privilege and education to attempt to disempower them further by lying saying science shows there is no God. If anyone doesn't believe in God that's understandable in many ways but to gain themselves more access to material rewards like tech, bling, cash, travel and sexual favours by disempowering those who already have nothing material by stealing their dreams using bad science effectively lies is extremely inhumane/immoral. They are in effect little if any different than the people they claim to be campaigning against, the scoundrels, thieves and sexual predators who call themselves priests and holy men and who misuse and misquote religious scriptures/philosophies to hide amongst unassuming religious good natured people in order to get access to sexual favours, peoples minds, money, children and homes. To manipulate them, steal their things by projecting false guilt and duty, who disrupt their families, who think they can make their own lives easier, themselves more powerful and their services (holy guidance) more sought after (by traumatised people who are seeking comfort) by creating more confusion as they assume the role of the unwavering, trustworthy, faithful, servants of God.  While this may seem to some unnecessary and unscientific to add to the paper my point is coming up. we have already seen that the big bang demonstrates how science can be misused and is in many ways interpretations based on what suits us ie. It is often subjective and it's abuse can give moral authority or credibility to people who do not deserve it. I decided to put it for a subjective personal reason, An old family friend, a kind, wise, intelligent engineer
, full of love and faith in a God, who is now very old, confused and scared by the world and what doesn't seem to make sense (some call it dementia. When he watches the news he becomes distressed, impatient, hostile, seems to lose his mind and acts irrationally, he seems to revert to being a child When he watches his favourite old comedies, listens to his favourite old music and when he feels safe he seems to remember everything, everybody and shows that relaxed, loving, tenderness and affection he showed to me when I was a kid. it hurts to see someone so strong in spirit who helped make me grow so strong in spirit so disempowered, exhausted and scared. Without such a wise old friend I may not have survived, the theory may have lay hidden for another 100 or thousand years that's IF humanity and the planet survived, it may not without it. So he is every bit as important to this theory being unlocked and those of his generation who kept that faith in God alive, to give strength to those of us who grew up to effectively have nothing else, deserve to be mentioned and respected. It was him who made me aware of how irresponsible and shallow thinking these people are. While watching the anti God squad on TV he casually said of the big bang "well they're not really saying anything at the end of the day, if that was the start, what started the start? Ah they're talking a load of bxxxxxxxx." Simple but genius clear logic that opened my mind and left it questioning rather than closed by a false conclusion presented as fact. 
[66] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/AxionIll
[67] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Anton_Zeilinger  this information I came across in the video "Quantum Theory" on Advexon Science Network on youtube. https://youtu.be/CBrsWPCp_rs

[68] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_15
[69] the name RIK I used in honour of the comedy genius and irresistibly loveable man who made me and my childhood friends laugh until we cried and had many moments of entertainment through later years impersonating his characters. unfortunately he passed on from this life too soon and too young but he appears in my dreams as God and is in a sense what I imagine God would be like if it were a person. A sweet, kind, hilarious, brave soul who just wants to make everyone laugh. As the field particle is likely to be known as the God particle I decided to name it after Rik Mayall. Rik perhaps could have been one of the most famous and successful comedians on the planet but he had a hanger on throughout his career who is so unfunny Rik probably didn't have the heart to leave him behind or his career would have flopped known as Eddy to many. So Rik stayed humble and kept poor Eddy afloat. if Rik was here he would probably worry Eddy might feel left out perhaps even cry himself to sleep every night while sucking his thumb and hugging a teddy bear with Riks face painted on it so I thought it's probably best I include his name in the spring segment so I combined the thread image with Eddy and called it a TREDD, I'm sure it's what Rik would have wanted.
https://www.theguardian.com/science/across-the-universe/2012/oct/08/einstein-nobel-prize-relativity

[69x] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Measure_(mathematics)
[96] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ronaldinho    
I mention Ronaldinho because of all the famous footballers I saw through the years, he seemed to me to instinctively understand more variables of physics and so have more tricks and magic than anyone else but more importantly he made everyone smile and so seemed to inspire love of the game more than any others. Probably because he himself never seemed to take things too seriously and always smiled... even when getting the red card. I say slightly easier because while he may kick a ball with less force he might do it with greater spin and curvature using almost impossible angles. This not just making it harder to anticipate where it will go but leaving opponents stunned and paralysed going what the =@&€ !!! as time seems to dilate and slow down as they watch helplessly in momentary slow motion as it sails gently into the net. So hopefully this will return the favour and make him smile. I make it reference number 96 totally out of sequence because just like 43 explained in the double silt experiment paper it seems such a lonely neglected number. So don't worry 96 I love you too. Mwah! 
[97] Of course it was really me who said "nice shot" I have a habit of doing it when I hit the screen at exactly the right spot but it might look a bit like I was cuckoo if I told everyone I was talking to myself in the middle of a serious scientific paper so I used Mick, he wasn't doing anything else anyway at the time.
[70] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_retroreflectors_on_the_Moon
[71] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Magic_Number  Arguably the best hip hop group because their music is not only intelligent and rhythmically infectious it is also great fun: funky............baby! Oh yeah! While on the subject! music made with a computerised drum beat is one dimensional time music and vastly inferior to music with a drummer or all human rhythm makers, only with a living beat does music move into 3 dimensional time and provide that unique magic of the experience of 3 dimensional time.
[72] 
[72] Patrick Speaks | Unreported World | https://youtu.be/AHfC6jqBhkk
[73] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Queen_of_Katwe
[74] https://abcnews.go.com/Health/International/man-eat-drink/story?id=10787036
[75] Dynamo Jack https://youtu.be/wYVdhKVb9WE
[76] Gonzales Sensei https://youtu.be/GNuPJEiEo5o

Although evidence like we see with Prahlad and Dynamo Jack is robust and rigorous we still see scientific literature stating that a person can only live around 4-5 days with water without qualifying that as "usually". My belief is this is in a sense a patronising way of protecting people. Not wishing to encourage perhaps young innocent people into "extreme lifestyles" the truth is suppressed. I maintain that the only responsibility we have is to empower everyone with the truth and when we oppress the truth to the extent that we impart false information (lies) we are being irresponsible. People are generally not stupid, it is stated clearly that Prahlad practices very disciplined meditation and perhaps has unique mechanisms unlocked which allow him do what he does. Similarly with the other 2 mentioned men, disciplined meditation over a long period of time is essential for such conscious advancement.

[77] The Secret life of Plants by Peter Tompkins and Christopher Bird 1973. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Secret_Life_of_Plants worth noting that the wikipedia article focuses on it's criticism by many in corporate media with links to agro business they fail to show any pseudoscience that they alleged. It is a highly scientific collection of excellent science from many disciplines.This again illustrates the point Dr Michael Gregor makes that in order to hold back truth/science corporate profit driven industry does not need to counteract good science  with good research and evidence which shows the opposite, all these profit driven people need to do is introduce doubt to steer people from the truth. 

[77a] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Last_universal_common_ancestor
[78] https://www.prweb.com/releases/2014/03/prweb11623245.htm
[79] http://physicsbuzz.physicscentral.com/2010/09/hawking-mlodinow-no-theory-of_30.html?m=1
[80] http://www.scholarpedia.org/article/Cosmological_constant
[81] https://youtu.be/MMiKyfd6hA0
[82] https://map.gsfc.nasa.gov/universe/uni_accel.html
[83] https://skyserver.sdss.org/dr1/en/astro/universe/universe.asp
[85] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stevie_Wonder%27s_Journey_Through_"The_Secret_Life_of_Plants" one person I know was so moved by this album it became his prized possession (after he assumed ownership of it so it was no longer mine, and held on so passionately I couldn't argue) he refused to let anyone listen to it unless they agreed to sit and listen to it all from start to finish.
[86] https://youtu.be/P6XIIjixDCU https://m.youtube.com/user/nickharvey7
[87] https://quantumartandpoetry.blogspot.com/?m=1
NUCLEAR ENERGY
It is worth noting that although nuclear energy has become hip and trendy again Spring Time Theory reveals that while they seem much safer using the standard model of particle physics the law of cause and effect means there must be byproducts. What the logic indicates is that they produce phenomenal amounts of neutrino waves. The affect this has on the land biosystems (bees perhaps) and ocean biosystems (coral perhaps) may be catastrophic. We still have to dispose of nuclear waste, another problem which makes it inferior to natural renewable, "green" energy.
[88] Paperback, 201 pages
Published May 1st 1991 by Faber & Faber (first published 1970
ISBN 0571141951 (ISBN13: 9780571141951) Edition language English Original title Deafness: An Autobiography
[88a] https://youtu.be/01mKyn_Gwcs there's more references of my own prophetic dreams in the main body of STT.
I guess Mick Jagger may want to stay on the surface unless he has a death wish. 
[89] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Maize_weevil
[90] currently awaiting the official link




[91] [86a]  [87] https://youtu.be/hv12oB_uyFs on Alf Eaton´s channel. The scientific paper is found at Roger Bach et al 2013 New Phys. 15 033018 Roger Bach et al 2013 New J.Phys. 15033018 https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/033018


[91a] Lecture by the Royal Institute's Jim Ak-Khalili on the double slit experiment 
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=A9tKncAdlHQ&t=266s
Thevideo does not provide links to the peer  reviewed paper on the which way experiment  but one can assume given their reputation the information in the video is based on thoroughly researched and verified data.

[92]https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Shape_of_the_universe
[93] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vortex
[94] We cannot only focus on vibrations alone, we must be aware of toxicity. However the toxicity in raw mushrooms can be used carefully in low or micro doses to improve health. In a sense similar to the principle of chemotherapy but without the excruciating, prolonged pain and nausea. The psychedelic substances in some mushrooms are especially powerful in accessing and cleaning certain areas in the brain which water alone is inefficient for cleansing. A similar principle of using toxicity is used by raw food practitioners when eating raw sprouted seeds, the toxicity in sprouts acts like chemo also but these are dead bodies and they come with deadly toxins especially in the form of heavy metals. These provide great nutrition in the short term but in the long term the build up of highly radioactive heavy metals accrues in the body especially in the brain and the radiation of gamma rays that heavy metals emit will eventually lead to serious problems. One of these is the increased risk of dementia, worry and distress in later life significantly in many countries from the consumption of radioactive metals in malted alcohols in beers, lagers and whiskeys. The alcohol is great for cleaning the blood and organs but the heavy metals tend to get stuck and even when being got rid of cause distress and disease in the digestive and cleaning organs in the body.
[95] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Blue_Zone
[94]  https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Fine-structure_constant
[101] https://www.framtiden.no/english/the-nobel-foundation-admits-investments-in-nuclear-weapons.html from 2017
[102] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muon (anomalous magnetic dipole moment)
[103] Beauty quark decay violation.
https://www.labnews.co.uk/article/2031225/cern-results-may-violate-the-standard-model-of-particle-physics
[104] https://youtu.be/tzQC3uYL67U
[106] https://www.hitachi.com/rd/portal/highlight/quantum/doubleslit/index.html   
[105] https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/RS_Ophiuchi
[106a] https://youtube.com/user/Suspicious0bservers
[108] https://doi.org/10.1051/0004-6361/201630164     &  https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2021/mar/06/four-indian-scientistschallenge-big-bang-theory-2272915.html
[110] https://youtu.be/nSbg3cuZNRQ
[113] https://physics.paperswithcode.com/paper/which-way-double-slit-experiments-and-born
[115] For the evidence relating to reincarnation and other evidence relating to metaphysics this video acts as a portal with further videos linked   https://youtu.be/lnfTf5JcW20

some excellent channels on youtube which I found the most useful
Veritasium
​https://www.youtube.com/user/1veritasium
Pbsspacetime
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UC7_gcs09iThXybpVgjHZ_7g
Physics videos by Eugene Khutoryansky
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCJ0yBou72Lz9fqeMXh9mkog
Some great videos by the World Science Festival channel also,
https://m.youtube.com/channel/UCSIvk78tK2TiviLQn4fSHaw

The evidence supporting the case for re-incarnation can be read here https://doubleslitsolution.weebly.com/reincarnation.html

Some quotes from the usually misunderstood, misrepresented, mocked and misaligned genius Tesla who gave us alternating current which has driven every scientific advancement since.
https://www.goodreads.com/author/quotes/278.Nikola_Tesla
https://giphy.i/gifs/water-fountain-vortex-etS1aToF9GSY0 water gif
kissing ball structure
https://plus.maths.org/content/newton-and-kissing-problem.
Gif illustrating the drag on spacetime.
https://medium.com/starts-with-a-bang/ask-ethan-is-spacetime-really-a-fabric-6d775875deef
Amndmt 1 amended to simply "light is affected by gravity".
Amndmt 2 fourth point added 24th June 2019.
Gif with representation of the structure of the space time fabric. Added 30/06/2019
https://robertlovespi.net/
Teleportation references:
www.sciencedaily.com/releases/1997/12/971215062803.htm
 https://m.youtube.com/user/InfamousPillarKid/featured
The study by the intercontinental team published in 16 August 2019 in "Science" Vol 365 issue 6454 pp. 664-668
DOI: 10.1126/science.aav8137
 
https://science.sciencemag.org/content/365/6454/664ttps://arxiv.org/abs/1707.00934


ANSWERS TO ANTICIPATED QUESTIONS
To answer possible questions which someone may have, yes I am aware it is now only a matter of time until someone builds a roller coaster suspended by super strong elastic and yes I'll probably have a go.
Also no I'm not a vampire. The mirror image would work for any being living truly in the moment.
No I do not understand mirror universes because I come from one, it's just logic reasoning.
Yes using time dimensions it is very possible alien spacecraft move around the upper atmosphere and outer space in different dimensions of time so remain hidden from detection. If they are I am certain that they are extremely intelligent and hence non violent so we have nothing to fear from them.
No I will not reconsider calling FUBs by the tem FUK for fundamental unifying kissing balls, it may be funny for 5 minutes but would likely be really annoying after that...as my brother would say...a bit like me. 
No the songs linked in my papers are not all my faves, some I never heard before but when I did some searches serendipity pulled out some pure gems. This is one of my favourite songs, I don't know why, I just love it. https://youtube.com/watch?v=TqLghoGLez4 The most powerful song I know probably the best sing ever written always brings me to tears, I cannot understand how anybody could get up out of bed or from the floor and function let alone write and sing it. It is beyond beauty and pain,I just don't understand it, I almost feel not worthy of writing about it here but it contains so much love that I think I should for anyone who hasn't heard it or heard why it was written. I hope and pray I never know that kind of pain and I hope and pray Eric and people with that kind of love do stay in heaven where they belong.   After solving 137 I think I realised (at least partly) how Eric could write that song. To give strength and comfort to other parents who lose kids to tragedy. 
https://youtube.com/watch?v=JxPj3GAYYZ0
  When I carried the cross up the hill I didn't  carry it across my shoulder as is depicted in every religious painting I have ever seen. I lowered my head to the ground and balanced the weight of it between my shoulder blades on the hump of my back.  
No, as far as I am aware Newton and Gregor were not obsessed with kissing balls...
It just happened to be one particular discussion of theirs which became very famous
No I will not reconsider calling FUBs by the tem FUK for fundamental unifying kissing balls, it may be funny for 5 minutes but would likely be really annoying after that...as my brother would probably say...a bit like me.
Yes in theory it will be possible to make "moonshine" using the teleport machine, yes possibly caffeine too although thats likely a little more complicated.
If the flazzma is a "perfect fluid" as some suggest quantum mechanics describes in the properties of the vacuum state I cannot confirm nor can I comment on whether or not that means it is 100% pure alcohol. 
This is likely the point where my brother would say "oh please, no more jokes."
Tumblr: olda means nddilis

---