THE INEQUALITY THAT SOLVES THE DOUBLE SLIT EXPERIMENT
This Theory beats the measurement problem with an inequality which cannot be argued with it conclusively solves the double slit experiment and is verified by peer reviewed experimental evidence.
For the standard model of particle physics to be the correct model it must fulfil 2 simple math equations
A+B=C And A1=A2 in both double slit experiments....but this is impossible.
For the SMOPP (Standard Model of Particle Physics) to be true the number of particles hitting the front screen A plus those hitting the back screen B must equal the number of particles fired C. Also A in experiment setup 1 (A1) which gets the interference pattern must be statistically the same a A in experiment 2 (A2) when run to detect for which way. This is because if they were independent particles they should act similar to balls in the macro realm being thrown against a wall with slits, some would get through while most would hit the wall and rebound regardless of whether we check to see which slit they went through or not. But an experiment run, recorded and peer reviewed in 2013 confirmed that this is impossible. We know few get through the slits when run to get the interference pattern but ALL get through when we detect for which way and get the twin band.
Both A+B=C and A1=A2 cannot hold in both experiments simultaneously. It is impossible, they cannot be independent/discrete particles. This absolutely proves the SMOPP is the wrong interpretation of the data.
In the double slit experiment when we send a regular stream of electrons (or other "particles") through 2 slits to create an interference pattern only a few make it through to the back screen, which is contrary to the popular assertion by many particle physicists that all make it through one or other or both slits. This misinformation is still taught as experimental fact in physics courses at Universities around the world clearly without checking the evidence and/or realising the evidence makes such claims impossible. As technology improved it became possible to record where each individual pulse fired would hit the back screen. This was done in 2013, peer reviewed and published online by Nebraska Lincoln University yet tens of thousands of views and 6 years later no one realised the significance until I went looking for the evidence to verify my Unified Field Theory in 2019 and found it.
I decided to put the peer review reference here because people who have been taught the wrong information seem to think this cannot be true, that I must be mistaken, I am not.
Those that make it through make a mark that collectively builds up to form an "interference pattern" of multiple vertical stripes on the back screen. This is verified in the timing analysis of the mentioned peer reviewed experiment by Nebraska Lincoln University physics dept in 2013 where electrons are fired at regular intervals but only a few make it to the back screen .
NOTE: It is not acceptable or credible for any physicist to claim they knew about this inequality before I spotted it and that it has already been factored into the popular interpretations of quantum mechanics. If this had been the case physical measurement interacting and affecting the result would not have been taught for the last 100 years because the difference clearly is determined before the energy even arrives at the front screen and/or the detection device.
[Note to anyone working with access to running a double slit experiment. Please run the experiment like this. Run this version of the double slit experiment,make 2 receptors for photons 1 left, 1 right, 1 behind each slit where the twin band is usually formed, fire photons one at a time in rapid sucession, a photon passing on the left=1, a photon passing right=0. See if it returns coherent binary code, if it does it is the Universe's spirit "God" in control. Link it up to a system see what "IT" has to say. If this works we should have all the answers to mankind's questions.]
Using common sense logic we would assume most hit the front screen ...but...there's a problem and this is the inequality, the proof by contradiction.
When we send electrons and try to detect which slit they pass through they ALL pass through one or other slit and make it through to the back screen and create a twin band pattern, which is different from the interference pattern. [https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Double-slit_experiment#Which_way see References 9,10,11,12,13.]
This inconsistency and it's significance (which I explained 2 years ago was vital to solving the experiment) is incompatible with the standard model of particle physics and the big bang in a one dimensional time paradigm. Why?
It is incompatible because if they were particles and time were one dimensional at the quantum level just as it is measured to be at the macro level then we should get roughly the same number of particles hitting the front screen and making it through the slits whether we detect for which way or not. This proves that whatever way we explain it the energy fired CANNOT be individual particles they must be waves and/or multiple particles. Up until now physicists have dismissed the idea that it could be waves due to the false conclusion that electrons and photons are discrete quantised units, they are not they are discrete locations where a wave, or in the case of matter, a vortex is detected. Nothing different happens in the double slit experiment when we detect for which way, the only difference is what is detected.
When we look at the evidence from the timing analysis of electron diffraction in videos by Nebraska Lincoln University  https://youtu.be/hv12oB_uyFs and the which way experiment explained in the video by the British Royal Institute [91a] https://youtu.be/A9tKncAdlHQ , we see a completely different number of particles make it through the slits depending on how we run the experiment: when we detect for which way all particles make it through the slits but when run to get the interference pattern very few make it through the slits (a difference which would be impossible if time were one dimensional and the the standard model of particle physics was correct). I had initially proposed we analyse hits on the front screen with the slits but realised this could be affected by the measurement problem if we only analyse the front screen. However if we analyse mark's left on the front screen AND count how many particles make it through the slits both ways the experiment is run (twin band or interference patterns) the count of numbers of expected hits on both the front and back screen CANNOT BE CONSISTENT with the expected mark's that the constraints of the standard model of particle physics in one dimensional time impose. For months I emailed hundreds of labs, physicists and journals trying to get a lab to run it and check, no response, Then when I found the videos by Nebraska Lincoln University's physics dept and the lecture by the RI I realised that even though understanding what is happening on the front screen is vital to the solutiom we don't actually need to see what is happening on the front screen because we can deduce from the inconsistency in the timing analysis of the two experiments most specifically the oddity in the timing analysis of the which way experiment that it already verifies the inequality regardless of which possible outcome happens on the front screen. Think about it for a minute if you dont understand...everyone assumed it was the wave function being collapsed when it is detected but if it was a particle moving forward most would hit the front screen and never make it through. So it must be a wave not a "wave function", it IS ALWAYS a WAVE. The wave doesn't collapse...when detection is done for which way the focus of the measurement is reduced to a much narrower range of space and time whicb corresponds to a straight forward moving trajectory, this is defined by the space between the particle gun, the space between the slits and the back wall.
If time were one dimensional then detecting for which way should have us see less wave crests make it through to the back screen, not all of them because most crests would hit the front screen outside where the slits are, in fact logic would suggest they would all hit the area between the slits on the front screen like a laser pointed directly forward would always light up wherever it is pointed to. When run for the interference pattern the range is set from the particle gun to all space on the back screen and as the front screen is in the way of some possible straight trajectories then most of the possible location of hits within that range are on the front screen, the others on the back screen are defined by the intersection of two new trajectories as a result of the wave being split into two at the slits.
If time were one dimensional and we dont try to detect for which way we should see one specific range being hit on the back screen, either the central band or two specific bands, one each side of the centre of the back screen (logic would suggest twin bands which are closest in space to the particle gun). However the fact that some waves registered as hits arrive in space further or closer to the particle gun giving a visible interference pattern while the speed of light and electrons are constant in a vacuum and in an area that could not be affected to such a wide degree of variation by any possible minuscule time dilation then time MUST be multi dimensional. Time MUST be propagating in multiple dimensions even if it can only be detected and measured in one. So either way whatever possible results we will get on the front screen cannot be consistent with a single particle travelling through empty space in one dimensional time so the standard model of particle physics MUST be wrong and the evidence is already clear, simple and undeniable in these two peer reviewed experiments.
Inequality © Sean G 137 copyright 6th Oct 2020 see CC copyright conditions below. Although the evidence for this inequality was located and revealed by me between November 2019 and Jan 2020 I only articulated it as an "Inequality" on 6th October 2020.
The concept of a particle as a single particle that travels through space must be wrong because that would mean that the "particle" would have to be hitting both screens (front with slits and the back screen with the twin band or interference pattern) at the same time so it is no longer a single particle, a singularity cannot exist in two places at one time, The field that I visualised to solve the double slit experiment shows conclusively that The big bang is wrong (there is a spark but not as articulated in the big bang). The big bang and standard model of particle physics are both based on excellent data but the maths have been completely misinterpreted. I give the correct model in this paper
The inequality breaks the measurement problem and the standard model of particle physics either way.
Because if time were one dimensional and it really were particles being fired we must get hits on the front screen regardless of what way we run the experiment. But because every detected particle makes it through when getting the twin band we must either be getting the particle through the slits every time, or firing dual particles with one hitting the front screen and one on the back both of which are inconsistent with what the standard model of particle physics allows. If we only get a hit on the back screen and none on the front then time must be multidimensional there must be a minimum 2 dimensions of time one giving the interference pattern 1 plus another giving the twin bands. This is also inconsistent with the standard model of particle physics.
While it is vital in understanding that the activity on the front screen holds the key to solving the experiment we don't even have to run any further experiments or physically look at activity on the front screen because we can deduce from the timing data that either way the standard model of particle physics is incompatible with either possible outcomes. The other thing it shows is that it is not the physical detection that collapses any theoretical wave function or causes decoherence it is the setup of the experiment. A fact that helps explain the quantum eraser and delayed choice experiments. The possible hits and patterns are already limited by the range of focus setup in the experiments. So the concept of a particle as a single particle that travels through space must give and is incorrect because that would mean that the "particle" would have to be hitting both screens (front with slits and the back screen with the twin band or interference pattern) at the same time so it is no longer a single particle, a singularity cannot exist in two places at one time so they must be the crests of waves. As I explain In the main body of the paper the dynamics and logic in the experiment parameters dictate that consciousness must be what is setting the focus and part of that consciousness MUST be within the field/spacetime/dark matter lattice itself.
I also provide a new simple way to run the experiment using a thread detector which I predict will detect time dimensions to change which direction light or matter fired forward will go (while the thread is placed far away from the expected path of the light or matter) and can be positioned to vary the width of the interference pattern. (To go straight to it search the page for "photographic")
This is the main hosting website of the long awaited scientific paper with the solution to the double slit experiment , and it's companion paper the Theory of Everything.
backup PDF of current version 19.02.2021 on Russian cloud
The measurement problem is simple, every experiment IS a measurement. The behaviour is different with which way not because of "the act of measurement collapsing the wave function" it is because we adjust the parameters of measurement within the experiment... in the equation we apply the operator consciousness to get results happening within different parameters of time (We are the conscious operators: biological beings and the physical universe) in the case of detection for which way we reduce the time variable to a smaller region of the wave. We adjust the focus on time using consciousness every bit as much as we adjust our corneas' focus using consciousness. Most conscious operations are communicated and executed indirectly on the physical parameters using primary/biological technology such as hands which setup the experiment, consciousness moves eyes which help with alignment, vocal chords and ears which communicate information between other conscious operators and also using secondary technology such as machinery, communication technology and code. However the time parameters are communicated directly and instantly between all operators involved on the measurement regardless of where they are. On planet Earth that is usually between two inseparable but distinct operators, Human operators and the Universe (the physical body within the void). Consciousness sets up and communicates all actions directly or indirectly within any system using physical technology, a biological body, a tool or a piece of machinery acting on a game, an experiment, a creation of art. While physical communication of information is indirect and limited by the speed of light conscious information is communicated instantly between all operators involved in the operation regardless of where they are in the Universe.
OPEN ACCESS CC COPYRIGHT TERMS
THE THEORY BEHIND WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING
THE MECHANISM OF WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING
THE EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE MATCHING MY PREDICTIONS
EXPLANATION OF WHY TIME IS MULTI DIMENSIONAL
HOW TO CALCULATE THE VOLUME OF MULTI DIMENSIONAL TIME
Han Don's INEQUALITY
DELAYED CHOICE QUANTUM ERASER EXPERIMENT.
ADDRESSING COUNTER THEORIES
SOME FUN THEORETICAL EXAMPLES FOR ALL AGES
THE MATHEMATICAL THEOREM Δt∝1/Δx³
FUN 3 DIMENSIONAL TIME DILATION EXAMPLES, USING THE FORMULA, FOR ALL AGES
THE QUESTION OF CONSCIOUSNESS?
ANSWERS TO ANTICIPATED QUESTIONS
SECONDARY FOOTNOTES AND EXPLANATION OF THE EXPERIMENT FOR NEWCOMERS TO THE SUBJECT.
ANOTHER EXPERIMENT SETUP TO CHANGE THE WIDTH AND INTENSITY OF THE INTERFERENCE PATTERN
Copyright Sean A. Gilligan 06/06/2019 (with later additions and amendments) Copyrighted under CC creative commons licencing. It i.e. any new information, concepts, formula, terms etc revealed by Spring Time Theory (STT) may be reproduced, translated in part or whole always attributing the name of the author and this website address clearly in the introduction to any publication, website or broadcast with clear reference and links to the website again within the main body/narrative of any such production. Anyone is free to use it, quote it, discuss it, improve it, if anyone wants to reprint and distribute it in print it must be printed on 100% recycled paper and distributed for free.(a "responsible forest management" paper source is not an acceptable alternative). Anyone wishing to distribute it online please use the link to the webpage. A PDF or other format may be made for personal use but only distributed if the website crashes or has other technical issues please. The free weebly service has been fantastic in facilitating this scientific breakthrough and deserves recognition/thanks, also as updates plan to be added to the update page in due course. Any printouts for groups, classroom, conferences or lecture notes MUST be on 100% recycled paper where there is recycled paper available in that country/state, for poorer nations who may not have recycled paper available please reprint sparingly and share.
Please note that most of this was written and edited online on a cheap $50 mobile phone with a cracked screen, much of it in the freezing cold with almost numb hands so please allow for the occasional punctuation or spelling mistake and irregularities in spacing. My phone can't type italics. Being a very intense and technical subject I have added a few moments of fun to the paper to add some mental breaks and simply to make it more enjoyable to read. This does not mean in any way that the paper itself is a joke, far from it. It gives a TESTABLE explanation for one of physics most famous and (until now) most difficult problems.
As Albert Einstein is attributed as saying "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough. " I am confident that I do both.
It has been written with easy English so should be understandable by most high school science levels and above, even by literate people completely new to the subject. Likewise it has some essential mathematics but not an excessive focus on complex mathematics and writing explanations in terms only those highly educated in physics and mathematics can understand so again should be relatively easily understood by all the same levels.
If anyone cannot grasp multi dimensional time there is the simple way of analysing the experiment shown at the top of the page to verify a particle is a part of a wave and the field responds to focus on time. That is after all what true scientific integrity is about, testing predictions no matter how unlikely or even ridiculous they may appear to us or how much they challenge our assumptions/beliefs.
Links to backup copies of the two main webpages are available on the Russian server at yandex in case of any technical difficulties with weebly. Please keep directing traffic to the weebly website as the primary site however please. It has much more information and their service has been fantastic in helping this scientific breakthrough.
INTRODUCTORY NOTE: In this paper I will primarily focus on the dynamics of the experiments and ways to illustrate the concepts revealed by them. Various writers and commentators on the experiment use different terms usually wall or screen so I use both randomly but always referring to either the front part where the slits are or the back area where the particles leave marks.
The reader should remain cognisant that when I refer to 1 or 3 dimensional time and 3 dimensional space in the paper I am referring to these in relation to measurement for practical purposes. While time and space each have 13 dimensions 3 of each are dominant, sufficient for keeping logic simple and useful for most measurement/calculations. 26 dimensions quickly become extremely difficult/complex to work with when we try to make exact computations on larger systems using quantum mechanics.
Richard Feynman is famously quoted as saying "If you think you understand quantum mechanics then you don´t understand quantum mechanics" This was true at the time but not anymore, now we can. The essence of the supposed incompatibility of quantum mechanics and Relativity is due to a series of false conclusions, failure to recognise the hidden variables and incorrect interpretation of data. The truth can be summed up in one paragraph.
"The particle in quantum mechanics is a particle attached by flexible elastic type lines connecting each one to a uniform number of other quantum particles at every point in the field. The conclusion that the particle nature of light rules out an ether is incorrect. There is an ether but it does not permeate all of space rather it permeates all space inside the spacetime fabric and waves of energy move through it. These waves of energy cause the quantum particles to move relative to the particles they are connected to. At times they momentarily stretch away from each other, at times they bang against each other and at times they momentarily get stuck to each other as waves loop between two or more causing them to bind momentarily leading to "matter". Usually light passes forward through the field but once a loop is created the external light then bounces off and we see or detect matter. These momentary connections are relayed along the field and all affected particles oscillate as they are passed. Because we (ourselves collections of intertwined vibrations passing through the field) are moving relational to other waves, when we analyse quantum phenomenon because all collections of waves including us move at thousands of kilometres a second through the field it appears like the waves themselves are particles, in reality it is the oscillations which reveal the field particles form/shape and collectively this adds up to all the matter in the universe. Gravity is not a force per se but an effect due to quantum field strings being stretched and objects moving towards the point of least resistance. Beyond the quantum particle level there is no gravity and there is no infinite singularity in a black hole, hence why they grow in mass. The hidden variables are 1: time is 13 dimensional and 2: consciousness is local at any position in the universe ie. thought moves instantly between any two (or more) conscious beings at any two (or more) places in the universe. In the field time is multi dimensional which limits our range of observation, for example waves are detected only as they pass single points/areas in the field or in Quantum Entanglement where the observed event only reflects one possible viewpoint of many, the results observed reflect the events happening within the time bandwidth which is focused on. Other events happening in different dimensions of time go undetected. Quantum mechanics is often described as being counter intuitive but it is not, the mistake is thinking that the probabilistic nature refers to the particle, ie. that a particle exists in many different states only becoming a certain particle when it is measured which is clearly nonsense. It is identifying the wave that is probabilistic. The wave is certain and consistent every time but the probability that we can detect a wave crest at a specific point/field particle is dependent on where we look and at what time we look there."
Measurement μ is a conscious operation î which acts on the system |Ψ⟩
While physicists say that the wave function in quantum physics collapses upon measurement this is not true EVERY EXPERIMENT IS A MEASUREMENT what they have perceived as measurement is just a measurement with different parameters. In the which way experiment they are adjusting the time parameters to a narrower range using the operator "consciousness" î so the expectation value is reduced/focused to a reduced range of the physical properties of the wave, in the which way double slit experiment that expectation value is the reduced area on the back screen. Any and every computation or experiment is a measurement so when we run the double slit experiment and get the interference pattern THIS IS A MEASUREMENT! We are measuring the probability of where a "particle" will be detected within the system. When we detect for which way we change the parameters for detection, we adjust the range of time which adjusts the range of location which changes our expectation values. In the first instance the time range is from the beginning of the experiment to the end, the spatial range is an estimated circular area encompassing the locality where the slits are on the front screen (soon to be confirmed by whoever seizes the opportunity first) and the large area on the back screen/detector. So with a wide range of space and time we get a large range of possible locations where the primary and secondary waves will leave a mark, we have a significantly large range for the expectation value. In which way we have two measurements of time within the experiment, the first time range is from the beginning to the end of the experiment and another time range is for which way which has the time range subdivided to correspond to every particle fired and the space between the slits or other area where detection occurs. Giving a shorter range of expectation values limited to the two bands on the back screen and no marks left on the front screen.
I have used the symbol μ for measurement going by the wikipedia page on "measure"
I used the symbol î for the operator "consciousness", a capital i "I" sporting the wuverly wikkle hat used for the operator in quantum mechanics and of course |Ψ⟩ for psi, all the information we have about the system.
One problem with the new model shows that what is traditionally known as a particle for example an electron, a photon etc are not particles but readers may get lost or confused if I use a completely new term so I will call these t-particles to distinguish them from the actual field particles the RIKs. T standing for travelling/temporary/traditional/theoretical particles. When describing the theoretical behavior of the illusion and how a travelling particle of any kind would act similar to a bullet type particle I simply use the term "particle".
This paper proposes that the mystery behind the famous double slit experiment of quantum physics is that time in the conscious realm is variable, in spacetime as Einstein showed it is relative to the observer and cannot be anything but multi dimensional directly relational to mass, time dilation in the field is space dilation. Even for light it is multi dimensional as light is still confined within time by it's speed "C". We can set the bandwidth of time when we define markers to set both position and momentum parameters.
In the double slit experiment matter and time have an inverse correlation with each other, they always create patterns which are opposite to how they should or would in one dimensional time. When an electron behaves in time like a particle it leaves a mark in matter like a wave. When it behaves like a wave in time it leaves a mark in matter like a particle. The way to unify and make sense of this puzzling relationship is with the understanding of 13 dimensional spacetime. )
It shows evidence of another oscillation source which defines the time bandwidth which can be measured using electroencephalography. It shows that consciousness is not just evident in the observer but also in the field which is responsive to both conscious and mechanical focus.
It proposes that while energy cannot be created in 1 dimensional time it can and does propagate out in 13 dimensional time. As waves of energy move through points in the field they release the potential/creative energy that exists in every RIK which spreads out in the same direction as the original wave.
By setting markers for position and momentum we consciously set the bandwidth of time and the results we get in the experiments reflect activity happening within the specific time bandwidth.
In the classic double slit experiment most of these wave crests arrive at the front screen/wall, the subsequent waves pass through the slits and the back wall but not all leave a mark. Just as every point in space may have multiple radio signals passing along the same airwaves only the ones tuned into will be amplified and detectable in our reality. In these experiments that physical amplification happens only when the three variables time, position and momentum are optimal at any point in the field and the mark is left. If time were one dimensional then any activity on the front screen should be the same because the detection is happening after the tparticle enters the slits, so the marks left on the front should be the same regardless of what is happening beyond the slits. I predict it will be different, no marks left on the front screen when detecting for which way and multiple marks left on it when getting the interference pattern.
It is expected that any physicist reading this is familiar with what is surely the most famous unsolved experiment in physics, the double slit experiment of quantum physics so the explanation of the problem need not be explained. For anyone not familiar with the experiment there is an explanation and links to videos explaining it at the bottom of the paper. Spring Time Theory  (the name I gave to the grand unified field theory that this paradigm unlocks) proposes that although physicists assert that this phenomenon cannot be the crest of a wave because it works with quantized tparticles a quantized tparticle is itself only one part of a wave and other parts of that wave go undetected due to the limitations of detecting locality in multi dimensional time, now supported with evidence. All crests of the waves i.e. the “tparticles” arrive at the back wall including the crest of secondary waves created after the initial wave has split into two while passing through the two slits on the front screen and spread out to form the interference pattern. However only some leave a visible mark where all variables: position, momentum and time are optimal. The simple solution I proposed in May 2019 was to analyse activity on the front screen in conjunction with the activity on the back wall.
If the detection is done further away from the slit using the filament thread detection method (explained later) rather than firing photons I predict we will see the interference pattern more localised or spread out depending on how far the detection is done from the direct path between the slits and the twin bands on the back wall. If detection is done near the slits they will show the twin band mark. If detection is moved further from the slits and left or right from the direct path between the slits and the twin bands on the back wall I predict we will see the interference pattern start to appear relative to how near the back wall detection is done until when the back wall is itself the closest marker in space and time or depending how far we move detection left or right from the path between the slits and the twin bands on the back wall
The total hits on both the front screen and back wall/screen added together is expected to equal the total number of tparticles fired.
Breathing break from the serious stuff for anyone wanting one 
When detecting for which way we have already set the bandwidth of time to correspond to the point of detection so we should get no marks left on the front wall as they are outside the bandwidth of time relative to space. On the back wall we only get the twin band marks within the same corresponding time bandwidth and spatial area width. If we remove that focus we get the interference pattern from a wider bandwidth of time which by its nature can cover more space. 
THE THEORY BEHIND WHAT IS ACTUALLY HAPPENING
What is happening we can now understand and prove with simple experimental logic, the exact properties of the field are explained in greater detail in the Spring Time Theory paper . Einstein called it the Space Time Fabric  others call it the Higgs Field  others Dark Matter 
What I am saying is happening is the particle is in fact energy/vibration being fired out towards the screens and the impact of the vibrational wave leaving a mark where time, position and momentum are optimal (The field particles/RIKs undetectable or obscured until disturbed by energy moving through it) and the subsequent vibration moves in all directions through all the connecting RIKs, As Heisenberg's uncertainty principle states the more we know about a “tparticles'” position the less we know about the tparticles' momentum and vice versa. This new paradigm is stating that the shorter the time range coupled with the more we can anticipate position, the more we can deduce momentum and the greater the chance we have of locating a tparticle's position as it hits the wall. With 3 dimensional time the further down the dome of the wave we go the less chance we have of finding hits as there is simply more space and time covered. The nearer the crest the less space and time hence the greater the chance of locating hits
THE MECHANISM CAUSING THE DIFFERENT PATTERNS
What is happening when the particle gun is being fired is that energy is fired onto the field and this propagates out in a spherical wave in all directions. Similar to how a sound wave is essentially energy of certain frequencies and time intervals that move out in all directions from an amplifier. The shape of the particle like the shape of the sound wave is propagated in all directions. The difference between the interference pattern and the twin band mark is due to the focus on DETECTION. While the wave moves out in every possible direction at the rate of x=e^π/n where x is positions of Mark's and n is the range between the gun and the location of possible marks/the range of focus on the wave. where e is the log of the Universe the basic movement of the quantum block 27.1828182845... x 10^-1 and n is the range of the sphere what we see in the experiment is that the value of n is narrowed with which way. When the experiment is run for which way n is covering a range of possible detection for all straight paths through space and time between the particle gun and the area on the back screen. So only some waves are DETECTED as making it through to the back screen because most of the wave crests hit the front screen which is within the range between the particle gun and the back screen. Those that do make it through naturally leave an interference pattern like we would expect from a wave. When detection for which way is performed in the experiment the value of n is narrowed to the space and time between the slits so all possible paths within that range must be detected on the back screen. None can register on the front screen because it is outside the range of focus for detection and so every wave is detected on the back screen and these correspond to the path between the particle gun, the slits and the back screen so only the twin band can be formed. The reason for the wave passing through the slit that is not running detection is that the conscious operators already communicate the information of the time the wave hits the detection apparatus and the awareness is that there are two slits being focused on. If a wave doesn't arrive within the expected time at the slit for detection the Universe knows the wave crest must have passed the other slit first and the focus or range of n is moved to the area corresponding to the path between the particle gun, the area within the other slit not running detection and the back screen. 2 conscious operators communicating is the only possible solution that I can imagine. If it were purely mechanical i can find no possible explanation as to why detection is reduced in range from the back screen to the slits when detection is run, similarly I can find no other possible explanation as to why we get the twin band, if it were a purely mechanical response we should only get one band on the slit that is being detected because a wave will always pass that slit and that passing will always be before the other wave crest can hit the back screen. I can find no other possible explanation and it is perfectly logical and natural because the fact that we can move our eyes to read this science already shows us that consciousness not only affects focus by the fact we can look at the page but in an instant while being totally focused on the words we can, without moving any body parts, hear a car pass outside (like I just did) whike being oblivious to other cars passing when focused on reading, or that focus could be on someone talking in another room or an itch on your leg that you didn't notice until now (but you have one now that I mention it, and you will try to ignore it to resist the possibility I can affect you but it will become even more itchy the more you try to resist, until you give in and smile). The fact that we can not only adjust focus but can move matter simply by focusing on it is evident by the fact we can now move our eyes and smile or say "what the @#$?" By exerting conscious focus we move energy within our bodies. Even though we are moving matter already caught and contained within the boundaries of our biological machine, our body, there is every possibility that both we and the Universe can move or block matter outside the range of our bodies. For us if our consciousness is raised to phenomenal levels like we see with practitioners of qi or chi, where highly disciplined masters can knock bricks down from a distance without touching them or force objects to spin when they are set up behind a screen or under a glass for example. Perhaps the most common example is in sports where the focus of the crowd (in soccer the "12th man") can have a very real impact on a move, very well witnessed by the dynamics at play in penalty shoot outs, where a highly skilled professional should easily be able to place the ball beyond the reach of a goalkeeper into the top corner in reality with the totality of the conscious energy coming from outside himself the kicker is affected by the conscious energy of others. Sometimes this is by millions of spectators around the planet with a live game and as the Theory of everything shows consciousness is local/instant at every two or more places of focus in the Universe so even a spectator sitting in his/her living room in a different country has a real impact on the game, surely why we love sport so much and why we feel such a part of any wins and losses.
The reason the point appears like a particle is because there ARE particles but they don't move position, they only oscillate as energy passes. Every point in the field has a particle/RIK linked to a fixed number of other RIKs ...26 altogether. 27 RIKs joined together at every point in the field (explained in my unified field theory). However when we pass energy through it and capture data which shows a tparticle it is only energy passing THROUGH the field particle/RIK detected at that moment in time. When physicists say an electron is quantized it is the field particle/RIK that is the smallest point detectable and is being detected at the moment when energy passes through it. To illustrate the point imagine we have a domino track setup and the top of each domino has tiny ridges coloured black and an image of a ball painted on one side of those ridges. So the image of the ball can only be seen at a specific angle as the domino is knocked down. Then we set a camera up to watch the dominos as they are knocked over. The image of the ball will be visible only at one instance as the domino falls. When the first domino is pushed over the camera records the image of the ball at that specific angle and the image on each subsequent domino as it is knocked over. When we look at the film later it may appear like there was a ball passing along the top of the dominoes as they fell but it only appeared so as the kinetic energy passed each domino knocking it over revealing the image at that critical angle. This is where the particle property comes from in particle physics https://youtu.be/qybUFnY7Y8w . The field is what has the particles, the wave property comes from the energy passing through them. Matter in all it's forms is essentially different manifestations of energy passing through the field. Similar to how we might have camouflaged objects sitting on top of a camouflaged speaker we cannot see those objects until a sound wave like a bass guitar causes the speaker to vibrate, the objects to move and we can see their shape.
So while our experience is that we are physical bodies relatively stationary at our location passing through empty space we are not. We are waves of energy travelling through the space time fabric/Higgs Field/Dark Matter (whichever term one prefers) which has physical form and oscillates as that energy passes at thousands of kilometres a second as intertwined collections of vibrations. The field then returns to rest after the vibrations pass. A concept which is hard perhaps to grasp for some, but perhaps no more difficult than it was for some to accept the world is round until one considers the logic and looks at the irrefutable evidence.
THOUGHT EXPERIMENT TO RECORD IN 3 DIMENSIONAL TIME
To illustrate why measurement in 3 dimensional time is limiting detection imagine we have a camera which is so finely tuned it flashes and lights an object but only records anything arriving back in an exposure corresponding to as near as we can get to one planck time unit, this set to capture the very very first "tparticles" of light arriving back. Any light arriving back any later than the exposure time arrives back too late and misses the exposure "window of opportunity". If that object is curved (like a wave) because any light besides the very nearest part of the wave is deflected after the first arriving photon it will arrive back at the camera too late so it is never recorded. One thought experiment to test for this would be to send a wave like the one producing an "electron" and have photons fired out towards it at different times, intervals of the smallest possible units of time one after another with the last photon fired being the one fired nearest in space to the camera. These photons fired from thousands of lasers set at different angles from the camera say for example positioned on the inside of a dome so all photons are deflected to arrive at the camera lens at the same instant. These fired in rapid succession one after another to make up a movie. We could also run this experiment with multiple cameras located on the inner wall of the dome also pointing towards the laser at the centre. With fine tuning and timing what once appeared as a single electron will show up as one part of a huge wave of energy moving through the field of particles/RIKs causing each to oscillate as it is passed giving the electron appearance.
My solution to the double slit experiment using 3 dimensional time (at the quantum level) has actually been backed up with evidence by Nebraska Lincoln University's film made by Roger Bach et al in 2013  but everyone seems to have failed to recognise it until I spotted it on 4th December 2019. Everyone can see the tparticle/wave duality but seem to have failed to understand it is caused by 3 dimensional time. The reason why it is time dimensions is simple logic. Because the recording by Roger and co is done recording the marks left by the wave function and not the twin band tparticle mode if it were 1 dimensional time we should see hits on the back wall with every electron fired as every wave would have left a mark when it passed through the slits. While if it were truly single particles some tparticles may have hit the front wall never reaching the back wall, this would be leaving time intervals between hits on the back wall while it could not be the same for waves. But this is what is happening in Roger and co's video. tparticles seem to be missing the back wall much more often than they hit it as if they were particles with some seeming to hit the front wall, when they do make it through it is one at a time again like a particle but leaving a mark like a wave. In fact because we are getting an interference pattern if time were one dimensional then every electron fired should be giving 5 marks from the 5 wave crests as both initial waves would pass through and interact but we are only seeing single marks left on the wall and these happening very occasionally not with every electron fired. Supporting the prediction that the varying results are happening due to constant waves but appearing like single particles due to the limitations of measurement in 3 dimensional time. So essentially this new clue to the mystery was revealed in 2013 but no one except me managed to recognise it.
Because Roger et al have set weak markers for position and none for momentum except for the back wall itself the bandwidth of time is logically set from the start of the time wave to where it passes every point in the wall. So the other wave crests that are not appearing in their video must logically be hitting the front wall. If the team could run the experiment both ways while the front screen is made of light sensitive material also we should see no marks on the front screen when detecting for which way and many marks left on the front screen when not detecting for which way, the number of marks registered on both detection screens added together should equal the number of electrons fired. This discrepancy can only be explained using 3 dimensional time and the inverse relationship between time and matter (https://youtu.be/Po0BbGMSX4g)
2nd EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE
According to the lecture posted online by the British Royal Institution on youtube  when detecting for which way the "tparticle" goes through one or other slit all of the time as 50% of the time detection is registered at the slit which is being monitored, so the logical assumption is that the other 50% of the time it goes through the other slit. Opposite to what we would expect of a particle. If it were a particle and not a wave crest then the particle should be hitting the front wall sometimes missing the two slits rather than going through one or other slits every time. A wave crest would always pass through however creating 2 secondary waves and only the wave crest arriving first will pass the bandwidth of time. So a wave crest will be detected or not depending on which slit the foremost wave crest passes first. Further evidence supporting 3 dimensional time. (https://youtu.be/hBbmD20FuSE)
FURTHER VIDEO EVIDENCE FOUND IN JANUARY 2020
I had a section here on an experiment done by Akira Tonomura at Hitachi but I discovered I had a misunderstanding of the experiment perhaps due to the fact some vital information is not stated on the website. So I have removed it and am reassessing how to explain it's significance. For now what it does provide is confirmation that all tparticles fired left a mark on the wall. Akira and his team found that a mark was left on the detection surface with every tparticle fired. 100% accuracy. Supporting my prediction that we will find hits on the front screen when it is also made with photo sensitive material and the sum of hits on the front and back screens will always add up to the same number of tparticles fired.
Han Don's INEQUALITY
I had initially proposed that we analyse how many particles would hit the front screen. This is because if time is multidimensional then the amount of particles hitting the front screen would be different, many particles hitting the front screen when run to get the interference pattern and none when run detecting for which way and getting the twin band. If I was wrong and time were one dimensional then the amount of particles hitting the front screen with the slits would be the same regardless of whether the experiment was run to get the twin band or the interference pattern. Then it dawned on me that not one of the hundreds of labs and Universities I had written to within the last year perhaps had in fact tried the experiment and found the amount of particles hitting the front screen would be the same regardless of which way it was run. I however knew this would be due to the measurement problem, when we have set the focus to the front screen before the start of the experiment then my prediction would be wrong. #&$%!!!! For a second or two I thought I was snookered by the measurement problem then almost instantly I realised this would lead to an inequality. The amounts of particles hitting the twin band at the back screen would have to be adjusted or if we got the same number of particles hitting the twin band area and some particles hitting the front screen some(probably most) would have to be hitting both screens ending the concept of a single particle they must be two parts of a wave whose crest hits both the front and then the back screen so either way my hypothesis must be correct.
DELAYED CHOICE QUANTUM ERASER EXPERIMENT.
In this experiment first run by Kim,Yu,Kulik,Shih and Scully  there are various different dynamics at play to see how they affect the result. Although the experiment seems to show that a result happening later in time can affect what happens before, as if a result was changed depending on events happening in the future. This is not what is happening. What I am saying is that the bandwidth of time is being set at the start of the experiment. Different variations are focused on different bandwidths of time so all results will reflect activity within those bandwidths of time. To illustrate this I use the example of stereo signals sent on two different radio bandwidths, the left speaker's sound sent by one radio station and the right speaker's sound sent by a different radio station. Visually we could have a black and white video broadcast on one TV station and a CGI image designed to superimpose colour images on the black and white video broadcast via a different TV station. These will be both broadcast at exactly the same time and be listened to in stereo for the sound track by tuning into different stations, playing one tune or song. With the video images both videos can be projected onto a cinema screen together combining to appear like one picture of black and white and colour merged or projected one at a time giving either a black and white or colour video only. With these we can tune into or show one or the other broadcast or both. For a listener or a cinema located near the source of the broadcast they will receive and play the broadcast before a cinema or listener located hundreds of miles away can or thousands of miles away using satellite. They will all see the same picture and each variation depending how they tune in but these arrive at different times. This is what I am saying is happening with the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment. The bandwidth of time has already been set before the experiment has started. The results reflect what is being tuned into. It is essentially the same as is happening in quantum entanglement, both observers are focusing on the same bandwidth of time seeing parts of the wave relational in space and time, just like someone on mars or the moon could theoretically watch the same soccer match broadcast from Earth. When they tune into the same bandwidth they will see the same wave product but it arrives at different times. So the tparticles are not communicating or sending information to each other, the wave has already been emitted and there is no delay in choice ( https://youtu.be/YQKklZxAOsE) in quantum entanglement explained in the theory of everything page it is the conscious beings who are communicating. It also indicates that there is at least one thing which potentially travels faster than light: thought/consciousness))
If we look at the delayed choice quantum eraser experiment setup in Figure 2 on the referenced Wikipedia page we see that with the markers D4 and D3 set after the wall D0 we are getting an interference pattern because there is no marker for time/momentum setup before D0 and the interference pattern is coming from the crests of both emerging waves as they merge and interfere coming out of the lens in 2 opposite directions. In the graph we see the central band area is much more pronounced suggesting the marks are not gradually different in intensity but there is more intense activity around the central band out of proportion to the general trend of the interference patterns indicating the bandwidth of time is set between the crest of the dome like wave of time and slightly further down. In space this is between the time band parameters set by the momentum detected between the gun and detectors at D3/D4 and the distance between the slits themselves. When we add second markers for time and space at D1 and D2 they are effectively erasing the first markers because it cancels out the first markers D3 and D4 as the setup widens the bandwidth of time and we get a general wider area of hits as we now get random hits from all areas of the dome like waves of time and space between the slits and D1/D2. What I am saying is that the beam splitters are always splitting the wave being detected into two waves but only one of the first two beam splitters passed is recording a hit from a photon arriving in the time bandwidth tuned into when there is no erasure happening. The other undetected wave is also always being split into two but in different dimensions of time so usually undetected. With the erasure that bandwidth is being widened once again so we see an overall general diffraction pattern with hits from every photon fired and no obvious interference patterns because the two distinct interference patterns overlap/merge. So the final marks detected reflect points from all waves sent.
Lucy's Certainty Principle is stating that an increase in the value of time gives a proportional increase in the number of positions covered. So our ability to detect a single position is reduced in proportion to every increase in time conversely if we reduce the time variable we increase the certainty of locating positions.
To visualise this imagine time having a curve like matter or any 3 dimensional wave, represented mathematically as a sphere/orb expanding out (for the purpose of the double slit experiment viewed as a dome moving forward out from the moment in time at the baseline where the tparticle gun is) and we can view it from the side with a limited range of focus along the dome's lines of latitude, If we focus on the crest we have a small area we have a greater ability to study activity there, once we move down the dome the lines of latitude become wider making the study of specific positions more difficult as there are increasingly more points. The new principle shows that the smaller the width of the line of latitude the greater the ability to study points because there are less positions, also we know more about momentum, the detection method giving a clearer idea of where the wave crest is in time in relation to the tparticle gun and the wall. The nearer we get to the crest the greater the certainty of being able to study/analyse. This is essentially where most quantum observations in "real time" happen. So while matter appears like it is made up of individual tparticles we are only observing that point in space and time as the waves pass through the quantum particles or RIKs of the field as explained in detail in the Spring/Time Theory paper  . Matter is a collection of transient temporary waves of energy moving through the field which has permanent from (which is flexible and able to form transient shapes as these waves move through it causing the RIKs to oscillate and returning to form after the waves pass, these waves are temporary but can last billions perhaps trillions of years). As we move down the wave our ability to record material events in time decreases because now there are more points along the lines of latitude of the time wave. The smaller the time waves bandwidth the greater the certainty of locating an observable position of matter in a specific area in space and time, while the greater the size of the time bandwidth the less certainty of locating an observation at a specific point in space and time.
For many physicists reading this I can see a problem. Some will be saying "OK that makes sense, the evidence does indicate the effect is due to the time bandwidth being adjusted but how do we prove it? And what is the physical mechanism?" This is where physicists must refresh their understanding of metaphysics. Metaphysics, the science of consciousness/spirituality is about measuring using internal biological measurement or intuition not mechanical external measurement, just as we cannot measure love or kindness by numbers (a poor person giving a dollar to a beggar when it is half of all s/he has is kinder than a billionaire who gives the same beggar $19,000 because it is an uncomfortable weight in her handbag or she wants to buy popularity). As for the mechanism, the mechanism IS consciousness. While there is a physical mechanism for adjusting the focus of a lens by increasing or decreasing the curvature of the lens there is no physical way to measure how our eyes stay fixed and focused on the object being watched but our attention moves to hear what a colleague is saying about us at the other side of the lab. In that moment data is still being collected by the eyes but it is not being processed, it is passing through and not registering because the data collection is now focused on the audio source. Similarly in the experiment any waves passing through matter which is outside the time bandwidth is not registered. So the field must be conscious and responsive to our thoughts.
Mass occurs when energy above critical threshold causes resistance leading to a stretch in the fabric and information having to travel along that extra distance caused by the stretch. The stretch is caused by the RIKs clumping into balls and energy moving within them causing immense vibration and disturbance in the field, in the quantum level as the bosons and fermions described in the standard model of particle physics and explained in the Spring/Time Theory paper. At the physical level: Planets, Stars, Black holes a bit (but not exactly) like an elastic thread around a spool (explained in more detail in the UFT page ) and the extra distance happens due to the surrounding fabric being stretched between points in the field which are normally touching when there is no mass in outer space. To illustrate why time dilates with curvature consider two runners traveling along 2 parallel roads (when viewed along one dimension i.e. from above), however one path is flat the other has a hill so the one passing over the hill still moves straight forward but her overall time is stretched due to the curvature(viewed from one dimension “above” she appears to slow down, she doesn't however but her overall time is stretched). Just as mass increases in 3 measurable dimensions so does time.
HOW TO CALCULATE THE VOLUME OF 3 DIMENSIONAL TIME
To illustrate how to calculate the volume of time we need to assume a few measurements.
(a)a universal fixed second which I will call a cosmic second "cs" and a dilateable quantum second "qs" corresponding to the time it takes to send one unit of information/light one agreed unit of distance in 1cs at an agreed location which I will set at Earth sea level.
(b)A quantum bit "qb" for a unit of information.
(c)A universal unit of distance, a quantum metre "qm" corresponding to the distance light can travel in a straight line through field particles in one cs which is through 1,000,000 RIKs at Earth sea level.
(d)A theoretical as yet undiscovered metal which I will name Zancozphoz "Zzz" whose distance from its atomic nucleus to the outside of it´s first electron orbital which is perfectly spherical is 1qm at Earth sea level and its electron orbital "shell" extends from 0.7 the width of the radius to the full radius width.
(e) a super massive planet Zob which causes immense time dilation dilating one qs at Earth's sea level to 0.5qs at Zob's sea level.
If we set one cs as equal to one qs at Earth sea level. This corresponding to the distance we can send one qb 1qm at Earths sea level then using the formula for the volume of a shell
1.333 x π(3.14)R³-1.333 x π(3.14) x r³
If Zzz has an electron orbital which has a shell which extends from 0.7 the width of the radius to the full width of the radius we can move 0.363qb through one inner electron shell of Zzz in one dilateable second (1cs) at earth's sea level because the volume of the shell here is a total of 2.75qm
1.333x3.14x1 (1³)-1.333x3x3.14x0.343 (0.7³)
1/2.75qb 0.363qb in one cs
When the atom is taken to Zob and dilated to 0.5ds in one cs because it takes one qb twice as long to travel through 1,000,000 RIKs as they are stretched to twice the distance. Then the electron orbital is also stretched to twice it's width and the electron orbital shell is stretched also so now its volume is
So now we can't only move 1/2 the amount of information (0.363/2 or 0.181qb)through in one cs. Now the volume is significantly larger 22.02/2.75=8
Roughly 8 times larger so we can only send 1/8 the amount of information 1/22.02 or 0.0454qb of information through the first electron orbital of Zzz in one cs https://youtu.be/aVGzYXbxslU
This not the exact formula, we need to factor in other variables which affect the equation also but hopefully it illustrates why time dilates in multiple dimensions. What it does show that is practical and useful immediately is that we should be locating our top level computers in outer space for optimal performance.
To consider why or how time dimensions affect what happens in matter consider radio waves. We have thousands of different signals passing through us at any one time, radio, TV, wifi etc but it is only what we focus on or "tune into" that manifests into the reality we experience. All potential audio-visual effects exist within the field but only the signal bandwidth that we focus on becomes amplified and enters our reality. In the experiment we only register events happening within the bandwidth of time that we tune into.
The detection screens being made out of tparticles are essentially where vibrational energy has got stuck in loops. Looping at trillions of times a second. As the wave of vibrational energy is sent out from the "gun" it passes all tparticles as their waves of energy loop but it only hits another vibration crest in one tparticle head on to knock it out of its loop and back into the field to move freely again. The time bandwidth is set at both points: the gun and the loops so only at one point in the time range set will they both meet and collide. Consider it like this, it is a bit (but not exactly) like if we photograph light on a traditional television screen. At a certain speed of exposure the light is at one point in the screen. Every time we photograph at this speed we will always get that one single point somewhere on the screen. If we time taking the photograph more precisely we will get that point at a more specific location on the screen every time. Similarly when we increase the time focus on the double slit experiment by detecting for which way we will get a more predictable position where a mark will be left in space.
The only place where time is one dimensional existing in the same moment in different points in space is in our consciousness. This is done by consciously putting together all the information we have. It is objective to within reasonable guidelines/deductions but sometimes these are flawed. In this experiment the assumption that time is one dimensional and only phenomenon observed happening within one time dimension are "real" or "possible" turns out to be a flaw. Another possible flaw is that which dismisses consciousness as a factor even though it's a scientific fact that thoughts create oscillations is another.
To try to explain time dimensions with comparison to physical dimensions imagine a ball moving forward. From afar or to the untrained eye it seems to be moving forward at speed along the forward dimensional axis but it is usually also spinning. So when one hits or deflects that ball in order to get it to go where we want it to go one takes into account the spin in three dimensions. Similarly with time while it moves forward in one dimension there are also variables happening in the other two dimensions of time which we must take into account to advance to where we want to get to. To illustrate it, consider on a global scale the world has become predominantly focused on getting things done as fast as possible in the search for efficiency but this has ended up with immense inefficiency. While some can send a robot to mars in the assertion it is in the interest of the advancement of mankind millions are still living in mud huts with no primary education, running water or electricity, in the case of Deaf people, millions of highly intelligent people like Patrick Otama from Uganda  without even access to language. An immense loss of brainpower (and goodwill) which is detrimental to not only those in poverty but everyone. If one watches the film "the Queen of Katwe"  a good example of the slightest access to education unleasing immense intelligence that was always there. We saw with the development of fertilisers the idea of faster crops with bigger yields, though there is much evidence that this was/is untrue , but with these fertilisers came inferior food quality, depletion of soil microbiome diversity, loss of animal species and vegetation diversity. With such mentioned poverty comes the increased risk of conflict. While we tend to see physical objects as two dimensional we know a physical object is multi dimensional defined by 3 measurable dimensions of space. While we tend to think of time as one dimensional it is not it is defined by 3 main dimensions of time. The predominant focus is on one dimension past to future. When one focuses on the present as in meditation one tends to stop focusing on the past and future by feeling all that is happening now and ultimately sees more possibilities. While we can dwell on the past which is often futile or believe the future holds a certainty which it never does (things never turn out as we imagine they will) when in the moment we can feel the vibrations of all that is possible within the moment and we are not limited by our expectations or false conclusions. It is a fuller existence because we sense more of what is happening and see more of the potential possibilities. Hence why it takes intense meditation practice over years for qi/chi practitioners to be able to manipulate qi to be used in healing and martial arts. While qi energy manipulation has been ignored and often rubbished as nonsense by popular physical focused sciences it is very real. While some of it's effects can be mimicked using fake setups by illusionists determined not to believe the evidence and prove it is all illusion, it is a real phenomenon. Thanks to excellent open minded scientists and journalists the internet we can see examples of meditation manifesting phenomenal powers in people such as Prahlad Jani  who says that he has not eaten or drank anything for over 70 years, D.J."dynamo Jack" from Indonesia  with incredible healing powers amongst other capabilities and Gonzales Sensei  who can create a sense of sleepiness in animals even over great distances. All have been scrutinised by scientific teams and all have been shown to be genuine . Essentially it seems they are all focusing on the moment and using the vibrations within that moment to exert effects on the physical world around them. Knowing there is a physical field that vibrates it makes perfect sense that they are affecting the vibrations with their own vibrations and creating phenomenon out of the field which most people who are not centred on the moment cannot do. To illustrate it I will use the example of juggling and the egg and spoon race. While the aim is to move forward with the egg speed is counter productive, one must first focus on the balance, get and maintain that balance while advancing skillfully. Similarly one can juggle while walking in a carnival but one cannot run while juggling or the rhythm is soon lost. In a music band or orchestra one instrument cannot improve the music by forcing all the others to go faster, it is the quality and richness of the time not the speed that allows all the harmonics to mingle and create that magic experienced by an invigorating sense of almost timeless beauty and creative power https://youtu.be/cWc7vYjgnTs . Similarly when we focus on getting something done as fast as possible we lose the ability to focus on all the possibilities and it often ends up counter productive. The perfect example being physical science where in the hurry to find answers many jump to conclusions and common sense often gets left out. When one stops to think about it and looks at the evidence, quantum mechanics states the big bang must be incorrect "a particle cannot inhabit a space smaller than its wavelength", (there is a spark but not as articulated in the big bang) Dark energy is gravitational lensing, dark matter is the spacetime fabric, electromagnetism is dependent on an ether, quantum entanglement is due to focus on time dimensions, the speed of light is actually incorrect, to mention just a few current flaws, a monopole and inflation neither make any logical sense yet current physicists controlling the power of the media to influence popular consciousness seem to become hysterical, abusive and destructive at worst and unreasonable or immovable in their thinking at best when these are pointed out.
Time does not just dilate due to the mechanical workings of the universe though it is affected by consciousness. It is likely everyone will know that time seems to pass by seamlessly when we are with people we love, when playing or watching a game, when creating a work of art, when doing work we enjoy. Conversely when we are separated from those we love, when we are bored, when doing work we dislike or waiting for something to happen time dilates so a minute can seem like an hour. While not measurable using mechanical means because technically the clock still ticks at the same rate that time dilation is real. While the clock still ticks at the same rate we already know that time dilates with disconnection from who or what we love, if the clock still ticks at the same rate the second still has the same length but it must have an increased width which cannot be detected in one dimensional time. To any physicist who says it just feels like time dilates in this way I would say two things first that is an assumption show us the evidence to back it up in fact the detection for which way shows it is real secondly what are feelings? They are detection operators we feel things to detect phenomenon, whether using our sense of smell to detect if food is fresh or rancid, touch to detect the shape and receptiveness of a sweethearts skin, these are not necessarily quantifiable using numbers but they are real methods of detection to quantify if something should be engaged with or left alone. It gives a logical explanation and using Occam's law we must go with the theory that shows the best correlation with the phenomena
It also probably means when the annoying little brats upstairs get up and play their games online on the free cafe wifi on Zob it slows down the broadband eight times more and is 8 to the power of 3 times more annoying for whoever is sitting in the street, stressed out beyond words being lumbered with the responsibility of solving the double slit experiment and Theory of Everything on Zob.
SOME FUN THEORETICAL EXAMPLES FOR ALL AGES
While matter is essentially vibrations in the field (Higgs Field, Spacetime Fabric, Dark Matter all essentially the same thing explained in the theory of everything paper) every part of the wave oscillation passes through the wall (itself essentially only a collection of vibrations) but the wall only records hits where all three variables are optimal. To understand this imagine dangling down swinging from the branch of a tree over a fresh water lake. In your hand you have a cup trying to scoop up a cupful to drink. Passing speed boats are causing waves whose crest is high enough for a cupful to be filled. The branch however is high up so in order to get it low enough to scoop we must swing the branch up and down varying the position and momentum but we also need to time our swing perfectly to catch a wave and fill the cup. If we don't synchronize our swing to the passing waves we may catch random waves but few and far between. To be efficient we need to know how the momentum of the swing affects the position and time it to coincide with a passing wave.
Illustrating the dome nature of the time wave.
To illustrate the dome nature of the wave of time consider the wave spreading out shaped like the southern hemisphere with the south pole as the crest. The more we look for evidence of something happening along a specific point in individual lines of latitude the greater chance we have of seeing it nearer the pole simply because the lines of latitude are smaller and easier to study being one point at the pole and then milimetres, centimetres, metres in diameter near the pole . The further away from the pole we go the greater the diameter of the lines of latitude and the less chance we have of finding activity as we have more ground to cover this becoming thousands of miles at the base of the dome the equator. With time at the quantum level corresponding to a multitude of points at the base.
To illustrate the point further with markers for position and momentum, imagine we have straight lines of balloons sitting just beneath the surface of a lake. Each balloon has inside a small rock and another balloon filled with helium. When a balloon is hit by a bullet it bursts releasing the rock to fall and the helium balloon (which is bulletproof) to rise and sit above the surface as it is still attached by string. Now it remains visible. Now say we have a marksman firing a bullet to try and hit balloons beneath the surface. Then we drop a large boulder in front of the marksman and send a wave out across the water (repeatedly one after another). Normally we can't see the balloons as they sit just beneath the water but now with the wave the balloons become visible as the wave passes raises them and reveals them. So the marksman tries to shoot one. Every time she hits the mark the rock sinks and the second balloon is released and stays just above the surface. The wave moves steadily however and at such a far distance that the marksman must shoot efficiently to hit the distant balloons beneath waves as they rise. If she has no idea when the wave will arrive she will be left with a less accurate shot. If she waits and sees the balloon rise any bullet she fires will arrive at the balloon too late as it has now dropped back out of view. She can only hope to hit some of the other balloons out from the centre after the most forward part of the wave has revealed the first balloon or with luck guess and hit a few central balloons. Now she may be lucky and hit another balloon which is raised into view later than the first balloon but it is essentially a random guess. The wave travels out in space arriving at different times. If we have a detector sitting between the marksman and the line of balloons and we know the distances we will know when the first balloon will come into view and can shoot to have the bullet arrive just as the wave passes revealing the balloon, even if the marksman decides not to hit the first visible balloon directly in front she can time the shot with a certain certainty to hit another balloon further along the line. If we don't have a detector she will have less certainty. Once the balloon is hit the mark is made and the second balloon rises and remains above the surface. In the double slit experiment detected for which way it is like the marksman having a set of small walls protruding just above the surface of the water with 2 gaps causing the interference pattern but not protruding enough to obscure her view of the balloons, now with a buoy detector placed just beyond one of the gaps she can shoot with high certainty to hit a balloon as it rises at the areas aligned to the 2 points between the gaps. She knows which side to aim at depending what time the detector moves as the wave passes. If it's placed to the right and is disturbed within the same time zone as expected she fires to the right aiming directly at the tip of the waves centre point shooting with accuracy every time. If it detects a little later than expected she knows the foremost wave crest must be passing left so she knows to aim there. It's a similar effect happening with the photo sensitive wall in the classic experiment when detected. When not detecting for which way all parts of the waves pass the balloons but not all marks are located accurately at the central area.
To help understand 3 dimensional time remember time is relative to each point in space and time so we are primarily focusing on the time wave emanating from the tparticle gun but we have also set the time bandwidth to the time wave coming from each point in space also in order to register hits. Where the two meet we will get a hit registered and that meeting point should occur at one but only one point within the time/space bandwidth just as the shooter will only hit one mark with each single shot. To increase the odds of registering hits at any location we must narrow the range of position, momentum and time relevant to both the source of the tparticle and the area where wave crests can hit leaving a mark.
The circular radius track race example.
To further illustrate how 3 dimensional time works consider this. When focusing on/observing a tparticle along the parameters of time it is in a sense just like observing competitors in a race, usually they race along one path from start to finish and we can record to see the results at specific points along that path/track. If the track was not set in one direction for example if the starting line in the race has all players standing inside an inner circle each facing out with his/her back to the centre and upon the start signal each runs out from the centre along a radius towards buzzers located on an outer circle. Each runs a different direction one North, one East, one West, one South and all other competitors to the directions in between. If they all run out from the centre and swing their hands down at the same speed they will all hit the buzzer at the same time. However with a camera set in one point in space and no buzzer we can only record and analyse one runners time with each camera and moment, even if filmed from above all times would have to be analysed at different times. If there is a square with each side a straight finishing line outside the outer circle (like the back wall in the double slit experiment) with buzzers located at the end of each runner´s path the runner directly facing/perpendicular to the wall will arrive and hit the buzzer first. The others having longer paths will arrive and hit theirs later, they move at the same speed but arrive along different paths so arrive at different times.
Another way: almost every educated person knows when we look at the sun it is as it appeared roughly ten minutes ago in the past, ten minutes being roughly the time it took the light to travel to Earth. If we localise that principle even more we can further understand it. If we see a person at one end of a street as we stand at the other end we are seeing them as they existed in the past even if we sit opposite them at a table. An incredibly small fraction of a second in the past but in the past nonetheless. If we stand on a street and we look in any direction we get thousands of different images arriving to us at the one time, some within a range of focus some in our peripheral vision: people, buildings, trees, clouds etc. We experience them in one dimension "the moment" or present which is constantly moving from the past towards the future. However each tiny point in the image registered in our "moment" of experience happened at thousands, millions, trillions of different moments in the past depending how detailed we wish to go. For the purpose of life we consider it all happening in "the present" but that is only our perception. So time is only one dimensional relative to each point in the universe, in reality time is varied in every dimension where we have space. Directly relational in 3 dimensions.
ADDRESSING COUNTER THEORIES
Some counter theories trying to explain the experiment have been detection impact and deflection as tiny tparticles must be fired to detect the main tparticle causing a disruption in wave coherence and the miraculous collapse of the wave function because it is being observed as if deciding how to act, all which do not stand up to logic. A buoy detector setup to detect a tsunami will have no impact on the wave. A microphone detects an audio wave but it's effect on wave coherence is only local at a very microscopic level, overall it has no detectable effect on the wave. Even a rock thrown at one part of a water wave or a ball bounced off it has little effect on the overall wave movement and would not cause other parts to go out of set path so it rules out the theory of interference in wave cohesion.
In fact Deflected tparticles would theoretically be LESS likely to form the distinct twin band marks on the back wall as they would logically be deflected randomly to all parts of the wall. Besides a tparticle is very unlikely to be detected every time by photons, the chances of missing a tparticle travelling 1/137 the speed of light numerous times is very likely while the chance of photons hitting and detecting a wave every time is much more plausible.
The idea that the tparticle is a drama queen and decides to act differently simply because it is being observed has always been and now is even less likely.
Another (fun but theoretically conceivable) theoretical possibility is that someone somewhere cracked time travel but bored with an eternity decided to amuse him/herself by travelling back through time to every instance where the experiment is performed and adjusted the tparticles' path after the slits depending on whether detecting for which way or not and will do the same for my way of analysing the experiment. Unfortunately I cannot prove or disprove this theoretical possibility but it could help explain where socks disappear to and who drank the fourth bottle of wine that was definitely still full the night before...unless it was one of the nights when Melissa stayed over in which case we already know it was Melissa who got up and drank it and I don't think anyone would be surprised if it turned out Melissa was a time traveller, that in itself would explain a lot.
As it stands the logic supporting 3 dimensional time is robust and now backed by evidence.
THE MATHEMATICAL FORMULA
Physicists on discussion forums couldn't understand (didn't appear to genuinely try unless I expressed it inside the parameters of their model which can't be done, what is simple logic in 3 dimensional time is often impossible in one dimensional time) what I was saying no matter how much I tried to explain using English and they continually demanded that any solution needs a mathematical model. (In other words, you must express it in our preferred terms.)
The certainty principle which I call Lucy's certainty principle or Lucy's law, shows that the greater the time range the greater the number of RIKs affected by the power of 3 by the momentum. So the certainty of detecting positions is increased in direct proportion to the decrease in the time range
In 3 dimensions of time and 3 dimensions of space
While we measure in one dimension of time until now we didn't know know that time is three dimensional. The field particles RIKs are already in themselves a volume, so we continue with another one dimensional measurement to get nx³. As explained in the Theory of Everything paper. All measurements always happen in one dimension of space and one of time. Until now we just didn't realise time is three dimensional also.
We can use the equation for the volume of a sphere again to show the probability of locating a position. If the time unit is a quantum tik "qtik" which is the time it takes light to travel the diameter of one RIK and we measure the volume using the radius . Then one qtik gives us the volume of the RIK as 0.5238. 1.333 x 3.14.... x 0.5³= 4.192 x 0.125 we get the number 0.5238 (quite similar to the number for an electrons mass..oooh serendipity mayhaps? Serendipity because this may ring a bell and make a connection in the logic for a cutting edge physicist mind that I can't see yet. Time has lapsed since I wrote that sentence and I figured it out, it is energy lost in neutrino waves). If the time is tripled so now it passes from the centre of the first RIK and through another in every connecting direction that is 3 RIK radius' so we get a volume of 14.1 which is almost exactly 27 times the volume of one RIK which is 3³. Which is the amount of RIKs directly connected in the universal shape of the field so now we have 27 times less chance of locating a tparticles position. If the time is extended for the wave to pass the width of 2 connecting field particles in every direction (5 radius lengths) we get a volume of 65.312 which again is almost exactly 125 times the volume of one RIK and 125 times less likely to locate a tparticle's position. So we get the equation for the probability where n is any given number nt is proportional to 1/nx³, if we increase or decrease the time we increase or decrease the amount of RIKs affected in every direction by the volume of time to the power of 3.
But we don't want the whole wave we only want to detect in the area which corresponds to the back screen. So initially we set the possible area of hits is the back wall so the range is the area covered from the tparticle gun to all positions in matter in between the gun and the back screen. So some hits will arrive on the front screen and never make it through to the back screen while some time we get waves passing and interfering leaving marks on the back wall. So we get a cone shaped area between the tparticle gun and the back screen. However when the wave hits the front screen it forms the 2 secondary waves after the slits and we see the interference pattern form within the widest circular area of the cone which is on the back screen. However when we set detectors the cone is reduced to 2 paths each shaped like a triangle (similar to that of a thin slice of pizza with its crust cut off) so the thinnest part extends from the tparticle gun through the slits and the widest part corresponds to the area where we see the twin bands on the back screen. The detection is set up and if the wave crest hits within a certain time it registers the passing tparticle. If no wave passes within that time bandwidth it detects nothing but the wave crest passing the other slit still hits the back screen as it arrives within the bandwidth of time set to the crust end of the pizza slice on the back screen. We also have to dilate the time because with mass the field is stretched so it takes longer for energy to travel the same amount of RIKs in every direction so time dilates in 3 dimensions. So the smaller the bandwidth of time the greater the certainty we have of locating a specific position because there are proportionally less positions plus the less the momentum the greater the chance we have of detecting it (it's easier to detect and save a football kicked with less force by Ronaldinho than a ball kicked with full force by him...slightly easier )
If the focus on the time bandwidth is reduced from the large cone area between the tparticle gun and the back wall by detection at a slit. Then it's time bandwidth would be set to correspond to a cylinder whose height is the height of the slit and the diameter is the width of the slit. Any particles passing outside this time bandwidth would not be detected and any wave crest passing through the other slit would be outside this time bandwidth. But it would still be the wave crest closest in time which hits the back wall and leaves a mark first. This indicates that the field itself is responsive/alive as the Unified Field Theory also indicates. There are two possible interpretations of how and why this is happening but either way they show that consciousness sets the parameters by the very fact that the timing is varied. The first possibility is that the wave of energy passing the detector is in a trough of time relative to the time parameters setup within the experiment and is not detected by the photons and the wave passing through the other slit is in a peak position of the time wave relative to the time parameters and detected at the back screen in the other twin band area. However the bandwidth of time is not set to the width of a single RIK, it is set to all space and time within the slit so this seems unlikely as we have multiple parts of the wave being passed through by a photon so detection should still occur. Alternatively...and almost certainly...While a hit is expected within a certain time bandwidth that is focused on when it doesn't arrive within that bandwidth the Universe's focus immediately moves to the back wall similar to if we setup a buoy to detect a tsunami. We identify a general area in the ocean where a seismic shift has happened causing an earthquake at the level we know which will create a tsunami but we don't know the exact position so next we check the buoy detectors. Knowing the general area of the source of the wave we have a rough idea where it may be in regards to the detector. If it passes the detector in the expected time we know the source and a better idea of where it will hit a shore so we alert the relevant country https://youtu.be/NpI777Ja07M . If the wave doesn't pass the detector within certain time we immediately know it will hit a shore in a completely different country first with the greatest force so we don't wait for the bouy to move we rush to make the best use of time and we alert the other country first then we alert all other countries likely to be hit with less impact. If time were one dimensional the second diffracted wave would still hit the detector before the first wave crest hits the back screen. However because time is 3 dimensional and dilates when the wave doesn't arrive at the detector within the expected time the consciousness at that location perhaps begins to experience time dilation in its locality and time slows down, While the focus is on the warning being sent the wave moves the buoy but is not noticed, so while it passes the buoy long before the wave hits shore it is not "detected" in our consciousness. In the field it is outside the time bandwidth being focused on. It cannot be our conscious focus that makes the adjustment, so the field MUST BE ALIVE, it is the field which is alive and has the consciousness which determines where the wave is registered. We set the parameters of the experiment but it is the field the Universe traditionally known as God the omnipresent being which exerts consciousness within those parameters. Just like our thoughts communicate with every cell in our body. The Universe communicates with every quantum point in it's body, the spacetime lattice. This is perhaps what physicists and mathematicians will find the hardest. The fact that time dilates in the conscious realm as well as the physical realm and the fact that the mechanism adjusting it is consciousness. While physicists like to have everything answered with numbers as covered in the Theory of Everything paper consciousness encompassing somethings like love, kindness, patience cannot be expressed in numbers but are every bit as real and powerful as measurable physical forces. Some people may think they can show someone love by buying them more things but it is common wisdom that that is no measure of love, gifts certainly show love but it is the thought and time that goes into making or choosing the gift that also factors. I heard it said a child spells love T-I-M-E as in the amount of time someone spends with them. Certainly much closer to the truth than the amount of money one spends on them but still no true measure of love. In the case of a child of an impoverished African whose father has little choice but to work in a mine for months or years on end just to provide for the child and family, that time is spent separated from the child with every bit as much love as there would be if they were together. So physicists may be disappointed that everything can't be measured and quantified in numbers but the positive side is it can be felt and that love shines through in moments all the time. If one is conscious and aware one will feel it and get energised by it's power. In the case of the experiment we cannot explain using numbers why time dilates when the wave doesn't hit the which way detector slit first and it is possible that we may never be able to explain the dynamics. All we know is that it does, the evidence is clear so the only logical conclusion I can find is that the field and every point in it is alive and responsive. It seems that it feels love/connection and craves it with time dilation when something is expected but doesn't arrive as expected.
Without consciousness what would happen? When the wave passes through the slit not being monitored first the wave passing through the detection slit a moment later would still be detected long before the first secondary wave arrives at the back screen if time were 1 dimensional. This is because the detection slit is closer to the non monitored slit so because of the speed of light C the wave MUST pass this slit before the secondary wave hits the back screen. The fact that it isn't DETECTED means consciousness must be present at the location being monitored/watched. The only possible and plausible common sense explanation is that the field is conscious and time is variable within every single point in space time. The reality of what it reveals is that the Universe is aware of not just what is happening mechanically but also of every thought that we produce, if it weren't I can find no explanation for what would change the focus from the detection slit to the back wall, a consciousness aware of the dynamics of what we are measuring is the ONLY paradigm that makes sense and it is consistent with the metaphysical evidence documented throughout human history. The only thing that gives an argument against a conscious universe is the dogmatic belief that there is no God and humans are the highest form of intelligence present on our planet BUT such a dogmatic atheist belief has NO evidence, all the evidence indicates there MUST be a higher intelligence everywhere on our planet and the Universe, as monotheists say an Omnipresent God. Monotheists say God knows your every thought and deed, this experiment shows the Universe IS God and does know our every thought and deed. While atheists argue that there is no God they have zero evidence unlike Religious traditions which have thousands of years of documented experiences of Guru's, prophets and visionaries, the only argument atheists can offer is that the writings in Holy Scriptures is inconsistent and appears contradictory so they must be wrong but current models of physics seem inconsistent and contradictory, quantum mechanics and Relativity being perfect examples, does that mean we should dismiss both because (before Spring Time Theory) we can't unify them? No, of course not they both clearly are very profound, they lead us to deeper understanding of the physical universe and we work to further that understanding, just like religious zealots try to reach a deeper understanding of the consciousness/spirituality in the Universe. It is as simple, shallow thinking, immature and delusional as saying there is no God because I haven't seen him/her and I don't understand it, so if I haven't seen anything beyond the "normal" visual or audio spectrums like auras or beings of light "angels" and I can't understand it everyone who believes it must be wrong/delusional and what they have seen are "hallucinations". Hallucinations are simply seeing things that other people haven't seen. A good way to dismiss such visions is to say they exist only in the individuals mind with zero evidence to back up such an assertion. (A similar mode of logic exists in the minds of the flat Earthers) If we look at the pupil of the human and other animal eyes we have layers in the cornea we find that carnivorous animals tend to have four layers and see fewer colours. [44a]. Humans have 6 but the last one seems to have atrophied through disuse or insufficient nutrition or both. If we are feeding on the foods most compatible with our anatomy  fruits and seeds we are likely going to be able to detect a greater range in our senses, see a greater range of colours and sounds etc and think clearer with greater capacity for mind expansion/lateral thinking. Conversely if we are feeding on the foods that scavengers, predators and parasites feed on it follows that our range of senses will be limited closer to theirs. Not only are our senses limited "dumbed down" so is our consciousness. Both Newton and Einstein are well documented as being Vegan (usually termed vegetarian but in the time when vegetarian meant true vegetarian: vegan). To be cynical one can say we ARE living in the midst of a Zombie apocalypse, the flesh and dairy eating hysterical humans are controlling even physics, unable to think to the levels necessary to think clear with certain areas of the brain inaccessible because of inappropriate fuels, they revert to half theories in what SEEMS comfortable. When we have "authorities" like the Nobel foundation being being run by people also consuming inferior fuels giving prizes for incorrect interpretation of data it is holding back true innovative thinking. So clear thinkers like me have the fight of a lifetime trying to reach the human intelligence which hopefully still lies beneath the carnal cravings for blood and flesh. For anyone reading this still eating animal fats look at the science which has no commercial conflict of interest, the evidence is breathtaking, the consumption of animal foods is the sole biggest factor responsible for all the biggest killer "diseases" from heart disease to cancer, diabetes to strokes, look at nitritionfacts.org drmcdougall.com and many others show phenomenal evidence for foods causing disease. Cancer, diabetes, heart disease etc are essentially symptomatic of an eating disorder: an omnivorous diet. (especially physicists with privileged positions of influence please be scientific regarding fueling your mind, if you are not grasping it please be humble and consider that perhaps it is not because I am wrong but because you are not accessing all the regions of your mind due to your diet and are failing to think incorporating the various neural dynamics that it perhaps requires, which seem common sense to me but perhaps necessitates connections in neural pathways that I have developed naturally through 30 years of eating no animal foods, leaves or roots only fruits and grains/seeds, regular water fasts, one 11 day no food or water fast and regular, deep, lengthy periods of isolated meditation.) There is no scientific, moral or logical reason left to eat animal foods other than in times of famine or extreme environments as a last resort. If you want to understand this theory I suggest you follow the science and remove animal foods from your diet and start thinking like a highly intelligent alpha species again, we have a planet veering on the point of no return, we need to think and act with the humility, gratitude and responsibility that comes with the privileges we enjoy as the alpha species and we need to do it ASAP  While religious fundamentalists often defend the killing of animals and the eating of flesh as being sanctioned by God/the Universe they ignore 2 blaring facts, this is ultimately always in the context of a God having to make concessions to an alpha species out of control in order to keep in touch with them and guide them to survival. Secondly the fact that all religious scriptures were written by humans many of whom lie, distort the truth and ignore what they find inconvenient. The concessions from God perhaps to allow for hostile environments where keepers of the faith may be driven and for visionary souls who are born into psychotic communities which consume fuels from animals that they may grow up oblivious to the horrors of the killing as youths and find the path of truth and peace as adults when they are strong and ready to stand up to the opposition and brutality such morality often evokes. All monotheistic ideologies end with souls in a "Garden paradise" where there is no killing.
FUN 3 DIMENSIONAL TIME DILATION EXAMPLES FOR ALL AGES
Lucy's Certainty Principle is stating that an increase in the value of time gives a proportional increase in the number of positions covered and an increased momentum. So our ability to detect a single position is reduced in proportion to every increase in time conversely if we reduce the time variable we increase the certainty of locating positions.
Heisenbergs uncertainty principle states that position and momentum are inversely proportional to each other. The more we know about a “tparticles” position the less we know about the tparticles' momentum and vice versa. This principle is stating that the shorter the time range the greater the chance we have of locating a tparticle's position as it hits the wall. It's a bit like trying to kill a supervillain in a computer game. Imagine we are in a helichopper above the villain and he has just stolen our new anti gravity skateboard and is using it to skate down a motorway. As the %#@# runs away from us the more he changes position as he moves forward ie. He zig zags and dodges left to right as he skates then the less momentum or speed he can gain. The less he moves to change his position dodging left and right as it skates then the more momentum or speed he will gain. Either way our chances of hitting him with a single bullet are effectively the same because we have to move the gun left and right or up and down every time he speeds up or slows down or moves left to right. Every bullet will hit the ground in a general area but the more we can understand timing the better we can anticipate where the dirty minging %#@# will be a split second after we fire and if we add a visual detection device like a telescopic sight with crosshairs to our gun then we have a greater focus on the physical target area hence we have a better chance of hitting the target. To understand why time is also multi dimensional with space If the stinking piece of %#@# is anticipated to be directly beneath us as our shot hits the ground then we must anticipate a different time bandwidth than if he is further left or right because the bullet will arrive at a position slight later after being fired if the target is farther away left or right than it would if the target is directly underneath. In multi dimensional time the further down the dome of the time wave we go the less we know about time and with no detection device the target becomes smaller relative to the overall area so the chance we have of hitting a target is lessened as there is simply more space and time covered. The nearer the crest we focus then we have less space to cover in time hence we have a greater chance of hitting a target. While time moves forward in one dimension it is multi dimensional because if we can dilate/expand time we effectively put the game into slow motion while processing information in our consciousness at the same speed so now in one second in the game we can think through much more data so we can calculate, aim and move our gun more to cover a greater range in 3 dimensions of space also so we can fire with greater accuracy in the same second that the game is running in. Effectively our brain stays the same size in the 3 dimensions of space but it can move more information because time has been stretched so that second is not only longer it is wider so if the second is stretched to half speed we can't only think through twice as many variables we can think through roughly about 8 times more variables. When the game is in slow motion then our brains effectively speed up relative to the time in the game. So we experience time contraction. So with the same amount of brain matter we can now not only process twice the amount of information we can process roughly 8 times the amount relative to the game. If information in the brian uses TREDD oscillations to pass information rather than light waves (which is highly likely almost certain/or even faster in a different dimension altogether of reality) then the processing power is increased even more.
This is probably why some people or person said that to God a second is a thousand years and a thousand years is a second. If consciousness transcends (is not affected by) space and God was a soul like everybody else but so powerful, intelligent and creative that she knew how to pluck the strings of the space time fabric so they make vibrations which became songs as planets, then other souls could come and enjoy her song/planet. She might go travelling through the universe on her magic carpet  checking out all the souls enjoying the beautiful things on the planets she had made in the space time fabric (like we might enjoy watching people listen to a recording of a lovely song we made up)she might stop and tell a funny riddle to someone on Earth and that being/person/tree figures out the puzzle in a few minutes and so laughs a few minutes later then in an instant she disappears faster than the speed of light and appears at the opposite side of the universe at a super massive planet called Nubz which has immense time dilation so the amount of information that can be processed in the same amount of space and time is hundreds of thousands of times less. Now she tells the same riddle to someone on Nubz when he is going for his first day at high school to take his mind off his nervousness as he goes into the unknown, then with time dilation it takes much longer to move the same amount of information through the same sized brain so it might take him 100 years to process the same amount of information and 100 years later as he is picking purple Nubz apples from a tree (now an old man) he solves the riddle and laughs, chokes on the apple he is chewing on but unable to stop laughing to catch his breath rolls around the ground and dies with a massive smile on his face. Perhaps as his soul leaves his body he sees God is there unable to stop laughing at how he died and off they go laughing together on the magic carpet to wherever souls go after they can no longer hold matter together (stay alive).
THE QUESTION OF CONSCIOUSNESS?
If the assertion proposed by many and spoken of in Ethan Segal's postulation  is correct that the interference pattern happens or doesn't happen whether the results are looked at or not is a bit like Schrödinger's poor cat. How would we know? Still it's worth wondering.
The fact that the interference pattern appears if we destroy or do not collect the data  when detecting for which way indicates that it is not just waves created by mechanical technology and the field that is responsive which is affecting the result it is also waves produced by biological technology which we can measure and quantify mathematically, Brain waves. The brain waves we can detect which cause oscillations are classed as alpha, delta, theta, beta, low gamma and high gamma . So logically the brainwaves which we focus on produce oscillations which coincide with wave oscillations in space and time to leave marks. This being what sets the momentum and space parameters in the experiments. Experiments ultimately show that conscious (or subconscious) focus on the bandwidth of time is what affects the outcome. When detecting for which way we are focusing only on the time bandwidth of the first/primary wave crest passing in time precisely at the slits. When we don't detect for which way or destroy the data without looking at it we already register a different focus in our consciousness and take data from a wider bandwidth of time which will not only include the primary wave crest but all waves coming within the time band set by the time the wave will travel from the gun to all possible areas between it and the back wall. These do not all reach the back screen as some hit at optimal points in space and time on the front screen and side screens (if they are within the distance to the furthest point on the back wall).
If we analyse the front screen in conjunction with the back screen by having both sensitive to light we should see different results depending on whether detecting for which way or not. While detecting for which way I predict we will see no marks left on the front wall as it is outside the time and space bandwidths which correspond to the gun, the space within the slits and the back wall.
When not detected for which way I predict we will see multiple marks left on the front screen as this is now within the time bandwidth (supported by evidence in the experiment run by Nebraska Lincoln University's physics department in 2013) This is because the conscious focus has been set to this bandwidth of time and spatial markers before each tparticle is fired.
When not detecting for which way we are focusing on a much wider bandwidth of time and spatial area so our brainwaves will interfere with material waves over a much wider area of space and time. This is easy to understand and quantify using both biological and mechanical measurement: feelings and mathematics. For example when we meditate we can notice focus on specific concepts, hopes, fears, frustrations, ideas. We can actually measure/gauge using feelings and using mechanical apparatus. We may not be able to gauge exactly which thoughts produce which waves (yet) but we can measure the oscillations created in the brain by consciousness using electroencephalography  we can feel change in thought vibrations as varying intensity, relief, excitation etc.
It would also be a mistake to conclude without evidence that these brainwaves are too insignificant to have an effect on the experiment. Anyone who has ever played a ball sport knows that the slightest touch of a ball especially when it is travelling at high speed drastically changes events. tparticles' waves are travelling at phenomenal speeds some nearing the speed of light, those like electrons which are in loops/orbitals in sub atomic "tparticles" are looping at trillions of times a second. With billions of years of evolution as our consciousness manipulated matter to create bodies We became increasingly aware of time with agriculture, music and science, especially the phenomenal advances in consciousness likely since we developed complex language. It is likely our consciousness is much more advanced, accurate and powerful than we even realise.
To illustrate why consciousness affects the result I will compare it to a sheep dog and his master. Brainwaves are real oscillations, in a sense microscopic sound they affect the focus. With a shepherd when he trains a dog and he wants the dog to get the sheep into a pen he will whistle or shout an order, he will send an oscillating sound wave. If he just wants to get the dog to move the sheep from one hill to another he uses a different oscillation. Similarly in the experiments the focus sends a different signal depending on the parameters we are aiming for. When the information is not collected or destroyed this has already set an oscillation level before the experiment begins, the experiment may be setup for which way but if the focus is not on the results we get the interference pattern just as the shepherd may have a pen open and waiting for his sheep but the dog will only herd the sheep into the pen when a certain oscillation is produced by the shepherd. Some may think "but the dog is alive the universe is not" this however is a conclusion without evidence, in fact the unified field theory which I present hints that the universe IS alive. It is every bit as logical to accept the universe is alive and can respond to every point inside its field as it is to accept we are alive and can respond to every point and cell within our bodies. We may not consciously be aware of every point in our bodies and it is mind blowing how we can communicate with each and every cell with trillions or gazillions of signals every second but our bodies do respond on a real level with a myriad of different stimulus and signals to each microscopic point. We can understand the mechanics using numbers and biological theory but it remains an incredibly amazing fact which we can never fully grasp because it is so complex and phenomenal.
We should be able to measure the different brain waves in all experiment variations unless that detection also affects the time bandwidth.
The double slit experiment shows that energy follows focus and it is conscious energy which tunes that focus. If we are in a crowded hall full of people chatting making an incredible amount of noise either audible noise (spoken language) or visual noise (signed language) initially we see or hear a large amount of conversational energy as noise. When we focus on a specific group or even person talking we can direct our focus we can distinguish to see their hand shapes or their voice by its tone and with enough light and or focus we can make out part or all of the conversation depending the range. All the other sound waves decrease in energy in our consciousness and our consciousness constructs our reality made of what we focus on or tune into. Even in a hall with thousands of people we can distinguish an individual tone of voice (if we can hear) or who is signing by focusing. All the other conversations happen we just cant focus on more than one at a time. This focus is energy being diverted using consciousness even if we don't move our body. We can be reading a book but in our peripheral vision we detect movement. If we want to figure out what it is without moving our eyes, say for example if the colour and shape in our peripheral vision seemed to be that friend who can't stop talking about himself we might keep looking at the book and avoid catching his attention. If we move to look he may detect the movement, see us looking at him and he comes over to chat. We can actually feel the energy of this focus changing from the words in the book to the peripheral vision while technically still looking at the same word. Probably why people say things like =@€&# off and stop looking at me! It is both an intrusive oscillation and it interferes with our focus if we are trying to concentrate (if we focus on it that is, then we allow it, most people train their focus as they age to take focus off/ignore what is unwanted and distracting and it usually soon leaves the detectable reality.) Just as random movement does. To detect this energy there is an easy experiment you can do which requires no equipment. If you can see and you pick a particular spot on a wall, or if you can hear focus on a source of noise nearby say a fridge vibrating in a quiet room. Then without moving try to focus on something else. Still looking at the spot on the wall try focusing on something in your peripheral vision or focus on a different noise. When I do it i can actually feel the energy change direction in my mind. The intensity varies and the frequency or "note" of the background noise in my mind changes in relation to the intensity or direction of focus. Further suggesting (to me at least) that it is an oscillation from this kind of focus that affects quantum entanglement. In the dohble slit experiment we are setting up different detectors for time and space so the universe is changing focus also which determines the path which the wave will be detected along.
So this seems to indicate that the field is alive, that the field itself is perhaps God, conscious and alive creating energy. Infinitely more intelligent than us just as we are infinitely more intelligent than a cell in our body. All alive but at different levels of consciousness and awareness. While until now it has been a law of physics that energy cannot be created or destroyed the mathematics show it is only detectable energy that cannot be created or destroyed in one dimensional time. We can only measure in one dimension of time (so far) hence why we always get one mark on the wall in the double slit experiment in the range that we focus on. It is one general area within an area that is localised in a general area corresponding to one axis of one dimension of time but with a greater or lesser range depending on our focus. We focus on a range, the wave propagates out in 26 dimensions, 13 of time and 13 of space but we detect the energy along one dimensional axis of space and one of time relative to the source. The probability of where that axis happens to be is equally distributed within the set range of focus, along a greater area of space the less focus there is on time. With increased focus on time we get a reduced range of matter demonstrating the inverse relationship so we get a reduced range of possible marks within matter and a higher probability of knowing where the waves will leave a mark. Using the logic of deduction we can deduce that the energy moves out through all points in the field. We just can't detect it all at the same time (so far).
So energy MUST be created. How is this possible? if the area increases the distribution of energy increases so the net energy detected at single points should quickly go down when measured along any direction chosen to be used as an axis. The wave however spreads out in all directions with relatively equal energy. Light should soon dim and be dispersed so nothing remains. However it doesn't it maintains energy for billions of years. Seemingly decreasing in energy only as it passes through gravity. But even here the energy is not lost it appears to lose energy but as the TREDDs expand in gravity they decrease in width or the size of the diameter of the TREDDs decreases. So as time is stretched the diameter and.hence the energy is decreased. The overall energy arriving between the RIKs is the same within the TREDDs it just means it takes the same energy to arrive in smaller doses over a longer time. So it is not lost it is simply distributed within the TREDD. When it arrives at the next RIK the RIK creates more energy at the level of the arriving wave. So while energy seems not to be created or destroyed in one dimension of time it propagates out in relatively equal force at every RIK as the wave expands. At first this seems impossible, it doesn't seem to make sense to us. But it does make perfect sense. There is an energy source. The RIKs have that source of energy. It is perhaps creative energy which propagates or multiplies with excitement. I would call it "I" which stands for conscious energy that is a capital "i" not a small "L". (Although this may be interchangeable for another reason, being if we equate creative conscious energy with love.) The consciousness coming from the field itself. As it gets excited at points it adds more energy in the direction of the wave. Similar to a Mexican wave at a sports stadium. When the wave arrives the conscious beings become excited and generate energy by standing up to join the fun. There is no other reason for the wave it is simply fun and the more fun someone senses (has) the more energy seems to be created in living beings. If the universe is alive it perhaps simply wants to have fun. The more energy that is created the more fun there will be exponentially over time. For anyone who thinks this is where the paper goes into hippy trippy, loopy do lally ding dong space cake nonsense think again. The mathematics show in the calculations of mass that time is 3 dimensional and secondly the logic shows that energy is created by the fact the wave maintains high energy as the area of the wave crest increases exponentially through time. The only thing we know that can create energy is consciousness. Someone may sing a song or dance or tell a joke and the audience get excited and feel energised. Some may argue that this is simply energy released but that is an assumption which logically is incorrect. It takes consciousness to create energy in art or sport, theatre or literature that energy is will, the will to win, the will to communicate, the will to make people have fun, the will to experience romance and love. A song or film is not just a mechanical release of energy it is a creative process of energy creation. Even so if someone asserts it is energy released then answer the question, if it were energy being released what is the energy in the RIKs released from? Either way it is created or released. I can think of no other logical source of a release of energy in the RIKs, the obvious answer is that it was created and the only source that we know of that can create energy is simply consciousness and energy creates more energy. As I said elsewhere in the paper it is as logical to accept that the universe is alive and communicates with or through every RIK as it is to believe our consciousness communicates with every single one of the trillions of cells in our bodies and this we already know is a fact. It is logical to assume that the Universe like most people ultimately just wants to have fun. Most people would agree fun makes life worth living whether it is through romance, music, dance, non violent sport etc these are what give us the will to continue again fun creates will creates fun. Violent sports in my experience tend to have more ego and greater ego usually equates to less fun and vice versa. Energy creates energy. So while some may read this theory and say "we are living in a matrix" technically yes perhaps but one with plenty of curves and the ultimate aim is to have maximum fun. We all know maximum fun seems to be inseparable from curves, whether it is going around the corner on a bicycle, the bend in a roller coaster, touching the ball in the game, the curve in a sweethearts chest or slapping grandma on the curve of her butt. Objectively there is no reason for these, ultimately they are just passing time but they create energy and fun, they give meaning to life. Curves and fun seem to go hand in hand and if someone wants to call the universe a matrix fine maybe so but it is one full of curves and hence full of fun.
The only thing which can destroy energy it seems is negative consciousness which ultimately all come down to fear the opposite of love. Greed, jealousy, ego, hatred, violence all manifestations of a reaction of fear to the pain we experience. Hence why it only takes one cheat, liar or thief to spoil a party, in a sense to turn the lights off. Fear the opposite of fun, hard and rigid it ultimately leads itself unto more pain so a bit of sympathy for the devil he probably is just doubting God and afraid that he will end up in more pain leads everyone who listens to his false prophesies (dark thoughts) into the same confusion and fear. Bend with the energy and one feels less pain. Energy can be painful but as all athletes or any leader in any field knows gain comes with discipline some say it comes with pain but pain is inevitable and in a sense is subjective.
The essential point this experiment reveals is that what we observe in one dimensional time focus does not reveal all that is happening in the universe. In fact we are only getting a tiny glimpse into all that is going on.
It is said that in the double slit experiment a photon fired cannot be the crest of a wave because it is quantized so it is impossible. This is true using one dimensional time measurement (but untrue using 3 time dimensions) where the focus can only be on one part of the wave. It appears like it is a particle which is quantized due to the limitations of viewing in time but it can be and is just one part of a wave spreading out in space and time. This normally not detected due to the limitations of locality of observations in time.
As my unified field theory "spring time theory"  states energy follows focus, upheld by the proposed solution to quantum entanglement also explained in the Unified Field Theory of Everything paper . The principle is similar to when we focus our eyes to a nearby object we can see it clearly but what is happening in the background becomes obscure. When we focus on the background we cannot see clearly what is happening in the foreground. If we are focused on a set area expecting specific results but something incidental is disturbed in the process it automatically draws our attention and alters our focus. When we use a telescope, binoculars or a microscope we can measure and study infinitely more than we can with normal vision but we lose our peripheral vision in the trade off. It's a similar phenomenon happening when we focus on measurements in science we are limited by all three variables of the un/certainty principles. Increase the focus on the time variable and increase the detail, decrease the focus and see the bigger picture with less clarity of detail and less certainty of finding hits at individual specific areas in space.
Hence why observations at the quantum level become limited to one or a few quantum particle/RIK widths. To take measurements we need to focus to that time and space range. To illustrate it imagine we are filming the first burst of acceleration of runners in a marathon. If we zoom out the detail is very limited, if all runners are wearing similar colours and the numbers on their shirts small we might have to zoom into see exactly who is positioned where in the lineup. Now we have the detail but we have lost the overall view of the lineup so can't instantly count how many there are in the lineup without readjustment of the focus. It's one or the other it can't be both at any one time.
This experiment shows that the time and spatial parameters we set define the reality that manifests. A concept which violates what we instinctively think is possible but which this experiment shows is a fact/science.
When scientists or sci-fi writers talk about parallel universes we (well certainly I did) tend to think of these universes existing in parallel parts of space. It turns out it is not just space but parallel parts of time (which dawned on me while watching the sci-fi drama"Stranger Things"  online). Hence why the experiment shows results specific to single points in time.
While these waves pass through all points in space it is focus on time which constructs the reality we manifest and experience.
The dynamics of time that I describe in the experiments and the workings of the field is surely just the beginning. We are likely to find out much more about time dimensions and perhaps other dimensions of consciousness in the years ahead. I hope to add any new understandings to the papers on this website or the update page if/when I come across any.
Heisenberg´s Uncertainty Principle https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/uncertainty_principle
 https://youtu.be/hv12oB_uyFs on Alf Eaton´s channel. The scientific paper is found at Roger Bach et al 2013 New Phys. 15 033018 Roger Bach et al 2013 New J.Phys. 15033018 https://iopscience.iop.org/article/10.1088/1367-2630/15/3/033018
15033018 youtube channel "Physics Footnotes" https://youtu.be/ZqS8Jjkk1Hl
[7a] Lecture by the Royal Institute's Jim Ak-Khalili on the double slit experiment
Thevideo does not provide links to the peer reviewed paper on the which way experiment
Akira Tonomura and co's work https://www.hitachi.com/rd/portal/highlight/quantum/doubleslit/index.html
 This shows that the female genies must have been deliberately removed from Persian folklore and replaced with a male genie/God because modern advances in communication make it clear that while male genies may have lay hidden in magic lamps and released when rubbed. It is female genies who always had the magic carpets which can transport her through heaven.
Yet both need each other to bring magic to the universe. The male genie/God as we know can create living things out of nothing while the female genie/Goddesses travel the heavens. However she needs the male genie and his lamp to bring life to the planets she makes, while the male genie can bring life to planets he depends on the female genie to let him onto her magic carpet to travel to different planets to bring them to life.
 Just to clarify for anyone who may be concerned, the Marks are not tiny beings called Mark being left on the wall. They are simply marks like as in when aunty Kate screamed "who the €@&# left that purple mark on my new white sofa" that kind of a visual mark. There are no beings of any form called mark or any other names harmed in the making of this scientific paper. Any decent physicist knows all the problems created with the horrific animal abuse of the famous physicist Schrödinger's cat  and I won't be associated with any such nonsense. Please don't tell aunty Kate it was me who did it because she is a bit psycho, you can blame my virtual mate Mick who is in the Theory of Everything paper because he isn't real but aunty Kate doesn't know that and he is really me so it's kind of not a lie, just make sure if she asks which Mick to make it clear it wasn't Mick Hucknall from Simply Red, I mentioned him in the Theory of Everything paper so just in case she gets the wrong idea and he gets a subtle elbow pointed at him, I don't want to be getting any innocent parties involved. Not that Mick Hucknall is a walking party, well maybe he is but I just mean in the formal sense of the word party used in legal settings .
 I think the 2 dots over the o in Schrödinger's cat are there to illustrate his cats expression when someone finally opened the lid, she was actually safe until then. Ah well, such is life.
I mention Ronaldinho because of all the famous footballers I saw through the years, he seemed to me to instinctively understand more variables of physics and so have more tricks and magic than anyone else but more importantly he made everyone smile and so seemed to inspire love of the game more than any others. Probably because he himself never seemed to take things too seriously and always smiled... even when getting the red card. I say slightly easier because while he may kick a ball with less force he might do it with greater spin and curvature using almost impossible angles. This not just making it harder to anticipate where it will go but leaving opponents stunned and paralysed going what the =@&€ !!! as time seems to dilate and slow down as they watch helplessly in momentary slow motion as it sails gently into the net. So hopefully this will return the favour and make him smile. I make it reference number 43 totally out of sequence because 43 seems such a lonely number, you often hear people talk about 1,3,7,8,10, 13, 18, 21, 33, 88, 100, 180 etc but poor little 43 rarely gets a mention so there you go 43. Your special place in history.
 Aunty Kate isn't really a bit psycho, she is a bit naughty but in the best possible way, she is actually really cool, my favourite Aunt and I miss you loads Aunty Kate if you are reading this. I didn't really leave a mark on your sofa it was just a bit of fun to do my bit to get teens and above interested in science, apparently there is a crisis in education with too many kids dropping out of science too early, I'm not saying it is definitely to do how stuffy and condescending some well educated scientists can be or how ridiculous some "serious" physics theories are like the Copenhagen interpretation or the outwards expanding universe model is or how mathematicians can make physics off putting with their obsession with overusing complex terminology to make it seem complicated and their often disregard for simple English or other mother tongues which might make it easier understood and attract more budding scientists. I'm not say that definitely is the reason I'm just saying....maybe it has a weeny something to do with it.
Aunty Kate is the coolest ever because she taught me a lot about women's rights, she didn't change the channel on the telly and kept a straight face when I was a kid when there was a woman suddenly topless in a movie scene. Another time when she was watching mens football in slow motion she looked at me smiling and said "ooooooh look at those muscles, isn't that magnificent". I was more interested in what was happening with the ball to be honest but I loved her all the more for being so open and passionate. She is cool because it is more than a bit discriminatory that men can take off their tops and show their nipples and women get abused even arrested for doing the same and sometimes killed for doing less while their nipples definitely are much more interesting AND useful.
Quote: The human cornea has five layers (possibly six, if the Dua's layer is included). Corneas of other primates have five known layers. The corneas of cats, dogs, wolves, and other carnivores only have four.
[ 46] One illustration of how stupid some people can become when defending eating animals and trying to appear intelligent I have come across was seeing one of the proponents of the Ketogenic diet (a dangerous irresponsible craze kept alive by liars, conmen, profiteers and idiots misrepresenting science) Dave Aspen making millions from "the bulletproof" brand propose in a panel debate that one of the reasons we need to eat meat is for collagen. Collagen is essential in our bodies but it is not found in true vegetarian(vegan) foods so Dave says we must eat animal foods. It is such a stupid argument it is akin to saying we need to eat teeth in order to have teeth but people eating these diets having their minds dumbed down with this inappropriate fuel/foods which "allows" them to eat guilt free actually go along with such obvious stupidity blind to how ridiculous it is. However some celebrity scientists having learned the theories formulated by great intelligent thinkers like Newton and Einstein with Degrees, Doctorates even Nobel prizes believe they are somehow on par with such intelligence. There is a cure for this Zombie pandemic, just stop eating the dead. Many vegan promoting physicians say one feels a change in a few days some see diabetes and heart disease REVERSAL within a week or two. The conscious adjustments are likely as fast perhaps faster. I pray people start sobering up from this "maddening blood of babylon" as the bible calls it, gets to grip with Spring Time Theory and we get focused on getting this planet turned from the current path which is heading towards destruction to a path towards rejuvenation.
 Patrick Speaks | Unreported World | https://youtu.be/AHfC6jqBhkk
 Dynamo Jack https://youtu.be/wYVdhKVb9WE
 Gonzales Sensei https://youtu.be/GNuPJEiEo5o
 The Secret life of Plants Tompkins and Bird 1973. https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Secret_Life_of_Plants worth noting that the wikipedia article focuses on the critics but fails to show any pseudoscience that they alleged. It is a highly scientific collection of excellent science from many disciplines.
I do not have access to a lab and have failed to get any physicists to engage to test my predictions so am depending on any scientists or labs able to grasp the concepts to verify my predictions (although Lincoln University's 2013 film And Akira's work at Hitachi confirms it in a way I didn't anticipate). So it may be a tiny obscure lab which grasps the moment and brings the new way of analysing theexperiment to fruition .
I call the certainty principle Lucy's certainty principle in honour of our symbolic shared mother whose remains are preserved at the National Museum in Addis Ababa, Ethiopia.
A woeful technical issue occurred while I was trying to edit this page which deleted a lot more information and other visual examples.
The foundation I wish any funds to go to has yet to be confirmed.
Additional references and links
Rothman, T. (2003). Everything's Relative and Other Fables in Science and Technology. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN 978-0-471-20257-8.
6. Newton's laws of thermodynamics https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/laws_of_thermodynamics
Image 1 CC BY-SA 3.0File:Ebohr1 IP.svgCreated: 11 April 2012
Image2 CC BY-SA 4.0 File:Double-slit.svg Created: 5 August
Image 3 http://www.studyphysics.ca/newnotes/20/unit04_light/chp1719_light/lesson58.htm
Image 4 https://imgur.com/gallery/kD3DAwn
Image 5 https://giphy.com/gifs/motionaddicts-design-mograph-particles-5xaOcLDoG0grTiWdfY4
Images 6,7,8 by the author.
Image 9 https://www.pakin.org/~scott/stereograms/spider-and-web.jpg Copyright © 2019 Scott Pakin and are licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License.
Image 9 https://www.pexels.com/photo/man-running-on-black-asphalt-road-1555354/
First video link Han Don https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WLL3UeQvwys
Second video link Brad Cameron https://youtu.be/DfPeprQ7oGc
openoffice free software https://www.openoffice.org/download/
BELOW IS THE ORIGINAL PROBLEM FOR NEWCOMERS TO THE SUBJECT
Here is a video explaining the problem
The below drawing of the new variation on the experiment and a 3D magic eye picture to illustrate the focus effect.
ANSWERS TO ANTICIPATED QUESTIONS
To answer some anticipated questions
No there is no scientific reason why anyone should collect water by swinging from a tree, no I doubt that it improves the quality and no I don't generally drink water by hanging from a branch and swinging, it is merely an illustration of the Theory.
No I don't usually hang out in helicopters or aeroplanes watching women run, it is not a fetish of mine, no I don't use satellites to do it I repeat it is not a fetish of mine.
Yes I am aware that if we put an actual slice of pizza through the slits the experiment wouldn't work that was describing the shape of the possible pathway only, it was not an actual piece of pizza I was recommending and yes it probably would have to be a pizza made by antman or doozers or similar small species in order to fit anyway, mind you the portions you get in Marconi's pizza shop on Mara St. might fit in.
I don't know Roger personally so you will have to ask him if he is related to the famous family of classical music composers. However funny enouvh Johan Sebastian Bach is perhaps my favourite classical music composer, sweet mesmerising music I could listen to for hours. https://youtu.be/pdsyNwUoON0 although Isao Tomita brought Mussorgsky's "Pictures at an exhibition" to a cosmic level that blew me away https://youtu.be/IVvQQMrEUzQ
I can't say for sure if I will produce any more scientific papers but going by what I had to go through to get these ones completed I certainly #&@€#€& hope not.
I can assure you that you can NOT buy anti gravity skateboards online, if any website is selling them I advise you do not give them your credit card details. If you want to keep your credit card details safe you can send them to me via secure encrypted email and I will look after them for you.