---

---||----||
. 

oldanddilis@protonmail.com
Tumblr: oldanddilis

The solution to the double slit experiment with 4 simple ways to tweak and analyse for 3 dimensional time is here 
​https://doubleslitsolution.weebly.com/deltatprop1deltaxdeltap-double-slit-experiment-paper.html

The unified fild theory that it unlocked is here 
https://doubleslitsolution.weebly.com/springtimetheory.html

This is a site that gives the solution to the double slit experiment. Solved and explained first online on 4th May 2019 by me Oldand Dilis. The solution is simple the reality of what it reveals is mind blowing, it makes me smile every time I think about it, I can barely believe it is true in moments but it is undeniable and the implications for mankind are so bright it is humbling to be the one who did the job. On paper it looks simple in reality it forces us to look at the Universe and life in a completely new way.  Physical science depends on and is reliant on one time dimension until now, the fact that multiple time dimensions exist at the quantum level means everything in science needs to be re assessed. It certainly needs to be reviewed and put into the new paradigm.

I am asking if anyone does the experiment and/or grasps the theory to share and spread it immediately and do not wait for peer review, I had an accident last year that left me about 3 months behind where I should have been. Also if it is peer reviewed by someone stuck in the big bang model (which the inconsistencies in the mathematics show is incorrect), they may not grasp it and it could end up lost in time and beaurocracy. If any journal, publication or individual wishes to communicate with me to do a peer review it would be most welcome as long as there are no strings/conditions which mean covering up this site or giving exclusive control over it.  Every day this is held back is a day of huge opportunity lost to the world.
It is a sad fact that this breakthrough has not only been ignored it has been held back and oppressed. When I have pointed out errors of interpretation in work that won Nobel Prizes I have had months worth of work deleted from youtube, I have been blocked from social media platforms. When pointing out these errors it is clear it is taken personally as an insult or as herecy which holds the big bang as fact. This should not be so, science should stand up to rigorous testing and I had expected scientific minds would be more able to think from different viewpoints. I have sadly been very disappointed and through my research have found there have been many other physicists who have faced anger and ostracisation from the academic scientific status quo when they do not agree with what the majority assert as fact. I won't name any living scientists without permission but one of the greatest scientific minds of the last century whose work won a Nobel Prize Fred Hoyle was seemingly cruelly and unscientifically marginalised and snubbed by the status quo of the time. It turns out Fred was correct after all, that the big bang is incorrect. He was mocked and ridiculed by many for other theories and as a result scientific advances have been held back due to his theories being ignored and held from stimulating fresh young free thinking minds. I plead with all readers to let go of their pre-conceptions and reconsider the logic.  It is a tragedy that what happened Galileo has happened again and again, rather than look at the evidence when common wisdom is challenged it is viewed as heresy hence the work is ignored and the world is held back from advancing.I have witnessed this in science forums also when I try to explain something the "experts" continually try to make it fit into their current model and understanding which cannot be done, when it doesn't they seem to hit a mental brick wall. To try and compare it in a metaphor it is like inventing the car and havibg it rejected because it would be harder for a horse to pull or like trying to get a digital TV to work with an analogue input. It simply cannot work, the new model needs a fresh approach competely 3 dimensional time shows dynamics which are impossible in one dimensional time but perfectly simple in the new paradigm. One must be open to at least consider the new model in order to understand it. In case any physicist thinks that too much work and effort has gone into this for so many people to be wrong that is not what I'm saying. I'm not saying the work is Insignificant, the advances in physics have been phenomenal, the building of the standard model from mathematics is amazing, the technological advances also, all I am saying is there has been a fundamental error in interpretation which has left all that great work and data essentially going around in circles. Some scientists I tried to communicate with either ignored me or politely declined to be interested which is understandable in many ways, people are very busy. The worrying thing however was having my work and attempts to engage people on social media were blocked. Months of work on a channel was deleted from youtube when I said the redshift is not because of an outward expanding universe but gravity, I explained the proper logic but someone took it very personally and complained to youtube perhaps using their credentials with a threat of legal action. Extremely irresponsible and unscientific. I remember when the large hydron collider was built there were many who voiced concerns it may cause unknown damage and be very dangerous, a fair concern. It turns out we didn't need to build it, I worked it out from logic alone. I had to learn the standard model in order to make it fit into the mathematics which it did, like a dream. Everything I came across I solved in a few hours or days. Dark energy, gravitational lensing, kind of extremely obvious once someone says it.
The fact I solved the double slit experiment by a fundamental understanding of time in an epiphany with no great knowledge of mathematics or physics shows the double slit experiment could in theory have been solved by the legendary greats like Einstein, Dirac, Planck or any others when the experiment was first performed at the quantum level about 100 uears ago if the focus had been on a specific factor that current mainstream physics tends not only to dismiss and ignore as irrelevant but often ridicules and mocks as unscientific: the "soul" or "spirit" or "consciousness" but it turns out is an essential part of advancing our scientific understanding. 


I came with an understanding of time dimensions that led me to provide the solution to the double slit experiment but with no high level mathematics or physics terminology so it's been a struggle to get anyone to understand. I've had to learn quantum physics theory and terminology as I go in order to get someone to understand. My concern is that mathematicians and physicists are being blind sided by their focus on traditional protocols and focus on numbers and missing the logic which is extremely simple. If someone could grasp the logic I am certain that s/he would see the irregularities in the current mathematics suddenly all make sense and can be unified. Something I cannot do as I don't have the training. 

This paper is not going through traditional peer review for many reasons, every journal I have contacted has demanded money which I don´t have, the other is copyright. Copyright involves payments and thereby excludes publications/nations with insufficient money to meet copyright terms. This belongs free to everyone in the world regardless of wealth or poverty so it is licenced under CC conditions. Which means any one and everyone can print and broadcast the work freely, they can also work on/correct/expand on etc freely as long as they cite the website and author clearly at the start of any, paper publication or website linked to it. Journals have said they will review it for free if they can control the copyright and sell it out, a discrimination which I cannot be a part of as it would exclude disadvantaged poorer nations and institutions. On the other hand they are willing to review it and release it under open source CC terms if I pay them a fee generally around about $3,500 which is simply beyond my means. 

I have sent hundreds of labs, physicists, Universities and organisations emails with the new experiment and it seems no one understood enough or tried to check it. If they did they didn´t let me know the result so I´m assuming no-one has.


Anyone wishing to contact me please try oldanddilis@protonmail.com bear in mind my time online is very limited at the minute. 


Please someone do the simple tests and put the results online immediately with CC licensing linking my work in theirs also for everyone to assess and review. 
​

Uncovering more realities

We are on a multi dimensional  journey in.....

.

Time dimensions.

Massive thanks to everyone at weebly.com for providing this fantastic platform for free. Your contribution in facilitating this scientific breakthrough to the world,  cannot be overstated.
​Thank you sincerely.

Massive thanks to all those who run businesses which provide wifi free and especially those who leave it on overnight when their businesses have closed so the homeless and those living in poverty can participate online. It is perhaps possible you have played a role in helping this scientific work get completed.

Thanks also to robertlovespi.net for the funky excellent gif.  https://robertlovespi.net/2016/02/05/open-octahedral-lattice-of-cubes-and-rhombicosidodecahedra/
Page hit counter added 17 July 2020